Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PO Box 40343
Arcadia
0007
i
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................iv
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
2. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH .................................................................................. 2
3. CRITERIA FOR PLANT/EQUIPMENT RATINGS ....................................................... 4
4. SUBSTATION PLANT/EQUIPMENT ASSESSED ...................................................... 5
5. EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................ 5
6. ASSESSMENT OF DISSOLVED GAS ANALYSIS RESULTS .................................. 26
7. SUBSTATION DOCUMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 33
8. CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................... 36
ii
ABBREVIATIONS
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Electricity Regulation Act, 2006 (Act No 4 of 2006) (‘the Act’), stipulates that the
Regulator must enforce performance, compliance and take appropriate steps in the
case of non-performance.
Pursuant to Section 4(a) (vii) of the Act, all licensed entities are subject to an audit for
compliance with licence conditions imposed by the Energy Regulator. The audit
objectives are to assess compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, validate
evidence of self-reported non-compliances, document the Licensee’s compliance level
and plans, and monitor the implementation of corrective action plans.
Eskom Transmission is the holder of an Electricity Transmission Licence issued by the
Energy Regulator with the following licensed activities:
• Transmission Network Service Provider (TNSP);
• System Operator (SO);
• Transmission System Planner (TSP); and
• Grid Code Secretariat.
The audit focussed on Eskom Transmission’s function as a TNSP as per its licence
which stipulates that “The Transmission Division shall operate and maintain the
Licensee’s assets constituting the transmission network in accordance with the Grid
Code in order to transmit electricity across the Transmission System within the areas
designated in Schedule 1.”
The Energy Regulator conducted compliance audits for the Main Transmission
Substations (MTS) listed in Table 1 below:
Table 1: List of Eskom Transmission substations audited
iv
The plant and equipment assessments were based on a range of ratings from 1 (very
poor condition), 2 (poor condition), 3 (fair condition), 4 (good condition) and 5 (very
good condition). These parameters for each rating level are explained in detail further
in the report. No weighting was applied to the ratings and every plant and equipment
was treated equally.
Based on the condition assessments and documentation/records received from
Eskom Transmission for each substation, the summary of findings (detailed findings
are available in the individual reports prepared for each substation) for all the
substations that were audited are as shown in Table 2 below:
Table 2: Summary of Overall Substation Condition Findings
No. Findings
A number of transformers across the various grids either have oil weeps
or are leaking oil. Oil serves as a cooling and insulation medium and whilst
1.
no transformer had oil below the optimum level, the leaks and/or weeps
require attention.
Infra-red scanning results are not kept on site for “at least one year” as
2. required by the Eskom Standard for Infra-Red Scanning on Transmission
Plant (Unique Identifier TST41-717)
Operation of split bus bar where there are double bus bar arrangements
reduces the flexibility of the substation during maintenance or under fault
3.
situations. This was in one substation. Eskom indicated they are planning
to replace underrated equipment.
In several substations, the yard stones that has been washed away or
4. where the soil is exposed poses a risk of shock to personnel or visitors
due to step and touch potentials.
Significant mould growth on the silicon skirtings of some bushings was
5. identified in one of the coastal substations, which increases the risk of
flashovers due to the moisture content of the moulds.
Rusted steel structures, platforms and security fencing which makes them
6.
weaker and susceptible to failure.
There are some inconsistencies in signing off workers’ register and Permit
to Work (PTW) forms. In some cases different operates use different
7. approaches in the same grid while in some there arfe differences across
grids. Eskom already indicatefd they would explore the possibility of
revising the procedures or the forms.
Original battery test sheets were not consistently send to the central office
8.
as required.
Bird nests and droppings are present on some equipment such as line
9.
traps, transformers, and capacitor banks.
v
Work orders in one location are not closed in the maintenance scheduling
10.
system when the work has been completed on site.
In a few cases routine oil sampling was not done within the six month
11. sample as stipulated in the Oil Management Standard (Unique identifier
41-966).
12. Cracked equipment foundations were identified in few substations.
Whilst age is not the sole determinant for replacement of CTs and VTs,
in one location the VTs and CTs are over 48 years old and pose a
13.
higher risk of failure. Eskom indicated that are implementing a “CT Care
Programme.”
Signage on gates and equipment in some substations require either
14. replacement or rehabilitation to ensure that they serve their purpose of
informing, warning/informing and safety.
vi
1. INTRODUCTION
The National Energy Regulator derives its mandate to conduct compliance audits
for licensed electricity transmitters from the Electricity Regulation Act, 2006 (Act
No. 4 of 2006) ('the Act'). The National Energy Regulator is entrusted with the
Electricity Supply Industry as the custodian and enforcer of the regulatory
requirements.
The transmission licence issued to Eskom Transmission mandates it in Section
4.1 to “operate and maintain the Licensee’s assets constituting its transmission
network in accordance with the Grid Code”, as transmission Network Services
Provider (TNSP).
The challenges being faced by Eskom in meeting demand recently made it
necessary to urgently assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the planning,
operating and maintenance of the electricity infrastructure that falls under Eskom
transmission division.
The assets’ status and condition is critical in determining if they can provide the
service that they were designed for. It is important to note that the transmission
network is ageing and thus requires more frequent maintenance, or rehabilitation
or asset replacement altogether in some worst cases.
Plant and equipment that is in poor condition often lead to unplanned and costly
failures that can lead to the licensee failing to comply with its own standards and
the Grid Code.
Unplanned outages have a huge negative economic impact on the South African
economy, as well as Eskom Transmission due to the penalties that may be
imposed should the Quality of Supply not meet the levels stipulated in the Service
Quality Incentives (SQI) under the Multi-Year Price Determination (MYPD) as
approved by the Energy Regulator.
This report is a consolidation of eight audit reports that were prepared and
discussed with Eskom Transmission. It summarises the results of the
plant/equipment status and condition as assessed by the team, the perceived risks
(findings) as well as recommendations to address the observed risks.
The audit team comprised the following members:
Mr Lovemore Seveni Senior Transmission & Trading Engineer
Ms Lorato Dlamini Compliance Technician
Mr Tamai Hore Senior Generation Licensing Engineer
Mr Siphiwe Khumalo Compliance Engineer
Mr Diketso Ratema Senior Quality of Supply Engineer
Page 1 of 36
2. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH
In conducting the audit of the transmission assets to verify their status and
condition, the following approach was adopted in consultation with Eskom
Transmission:
Eskom Transmission was very supportive before, and during the audit and all the
relevant staff were made available on the day of the audit, including for the primary
and secondary plants. Queries to site staff and head office were responded to
timeously and all the information requested was provided.
Since the major assets constituting the transmission system are its Main
Transmission Substations (MTSs), the effectiveness and extent of Eskom
transmission’s operations and maintenance as provided for in the Grid Code can
be evaluated from assessing the grid assets and the associated documentation.
Due to the extended nature of the transmission grid and the available resources,
Page 2 of 36
the team selected eight substations out of about 170 MTSs to be audited during the
2014/15 financial year.
The following criteria was utilised to select the substations to be audited:
i. grid location of the substation;
ii. location/ use of the substation
iii. transformation voltages;
iv. technology/type of insulation; and
v. age of the substation
Selection Criteria
No. Substation Grid Location Voltage Technology Vintage Audit Date
Name Location Level (Years)
(kV)
1 Craighall Central City 275 GIS 39+ 10 Nov
(delta) 2014
2 Bighorn North Industri 400 AIS 34+ 12 Nov
al 2014
3 Sol NE Industri 400 AIS 49+ 14 Nov
al 2014
4 Illovo East Coastal 275 AIS-SVC 44+ 20 Nov
2014
5 Muldersvl West Country 400 AIS 61+ 24 Nov
ei 2014
6 Aurora West Coastal 400 AIS 41+ 25 Nov
2014
7 Poseidon South Coastal 220 AIS-SVC 44+ 02 Dec
2014
8 Luckoff South Country 400 AIS- 12+ 05 Dec
Capacitor 2014
Page 3 of 36
• Eskom transmission asset register;
• sample design information for one substation;
• Eskom standard - Oil Management within the transmission division;
• Eskom standard – Standardization of High Voltage (HV) Plant Maintenance
template for Time-based maintenance;
• Eskom standard – Infra-red Scanning of HV current carrying equipment; and
• Transmission Grid’s Maintenance Performance Report – September 2014/15.
The criteria for inspection and assessing equipment are listed below. The
inspection checklists were completed by means of walk-through inspections. The
condition ratings for electrical plant and equipment are indicated at the end of each
description. The rating was done based on the following guideline:
Table 4: Rating of electrical equipment guide
Page 4 of 36
In addition, the following generic condition rating for other assets was used:
Table 5: Generic condition for other transmission assets
Based on the assessments and observations of the individual reports prepared for
each of the eight substations visited, the rating for each equipment/asset is plotted.
Page 5 of 36
An overview condition of the piece of equipment/asset is then given and any non-
compliances or outliers are discussed briefly.
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The equipment earthing in the yards were in a general good condition at most
of the substations assessed. No signs of theft of earthing conductors were
evident.
Page 6 of 36
• Sol substation has a broken earth bar at transformer No. 3. The Eskom team
on site was alerted to the fact on site.
3
2
1
0
Substations
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 7 of 36
• Although the foundation of Illovo transformer No. 2 circuit breaker is intact, a
10mm layer of screed applied to the surface of the foundation is cracking.
• The foundations of some equipment at Muldersvlei substation have a cracking
problem especially those for equipment on the 400kV busbars as well as on
equipment on the 400/132kV transformers.
• Foundations at Camden No. 1 feeder and at transformer No. 3 at Sol substation
are disintegrating. However, some repair work has been done on some
foundations.
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The substation yards are generally in fair condition. However, some yards
have weeds and the yard stone in most substations require replacement in
order to meet the safety requirements.
• Some vegetation was present at Craighall substation and vegetation control
is required.
• Restoning is required around Muldersvlei transformers 6 and 7 as the soil is
exposed. Some vegetation control is also required.
• There were also patches of weeds evident at Poseidon substation. There was
a contractor on site dealing with the weed issue at the time of the audit but the
problem seemed persistent.
• At Sol substation, the yard stone around the Kriel and Camden feeder require
restoring.
Page 8 of 36
5.6. Signage
Signage
6
4
Ratings
Substations
• Most of the substations assessed had their equipment and structures well
labelled.
• Signages at some battery charger panels at Bighorn substation were
handwritten in ink translating Afrikaans to English.
• Not all phases are labelled at Muldersvlei substation and some gate signs are
faded.
• The white phase label of the SVC was missing at Poseidon substation.
• A small number of signs is rusted at Sol substation.
Steel Structures
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 9 of 36
• The steel structures at Bighorn substation have significant signs of rust and
require painting.
• Some steel structures are in a bad condition at Illovo substation as they are
affected by the coastal weather. The structures at Rayon 1 132kV circuit
breaker and bus coupler are rusted and are peeling off.
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The lightning protection systems were found to be adequate for all the
substations. The catenary wire covers all the equipment and lightning masts
are installed.
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 10 of 36
• The majority of the substations have adequate lighting including emergency
lighting from Direct Current (DC) supplies.
• Sol substation does not have adequate lighting. Staff rely on portable lighting
when required. The portable torches are shared among nine substations spread
geographically in the region, which poses an operational challenge.
Safety
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
• Fire extinguishers in all substations were not overdue for inspection and/or
service and were the carbon-dioxide type.
• There was adequate portable earthing for all the substations and there were
no signs of rust or wear and tear.
• For all the stations, safety signs for use during switching operations or
maintenance work were also available in the storeroom.
• Ladders were also available in the storerooms and were in good condition for
all the substations.
Page 11 of 36
5.11. Substation documentation
Substation documentation
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 12 of 36
5.12. Power transformers
Power transformers
4.5
4
3.5
3
Ratings
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Aurora Bighorn Craighall Illovo Muldersvlei Poseidon Sol
Substations
Page 13 of 36
• There were oil leaks visible under the fins of Poseidon transformer No. 3 and
also on Poseidon transformer No. 22. The temperature indicators on
transformer No. 3 were covered in paint and were therefore not legible.
Transformers No. 11 and 13 also had oil weeping at this substation.
• The drainage at Sol transformer No. 3 is blocked and there is stagnant water
accumulated in the bund wall. The transformer also requires repainting . Sol
transformer No. 4 has oil leaks that are evident and there is also a drainage
problem in the bund wall. Transformer No. 2 has oil leaks although it is fairly
new and its foundation is cracking.
4
Ratings
0
Aurora Bighorn Craighall Illovo Muldersvlei Poseidon Sol
Substations
Page 14 of 36
5.14. Capacitor banks and capacitors
Capacitor banks&capacitors
6
4
Ratings
0
Bighorn Illovo Luckhoff Muldersvlei Poseidon
Substations
• The majority of the capacitors and capacitors banks were in very good
condition.
• No Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) insulated or cooled type capacitors were
in service at the assessed substations. PCB insulated capacitors are no longer
used due to their toxicity.
• The high presence of birds in the live capacitor bank was a concern at Luckhoff
substation.
4
Ratings
0
Illovo Muldersvlei Poseidon
Substations
Page 15 of 36
• While the SVC at Illovo was in good condition, the single-phase transformers
had signs of oil weeping.
HV Circuit breakers
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 16 of 36
5.17. Lightning and Surge Arresters
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The surge arresters in all stations are in a general good condition. No broken
porcelain or earthing conductors were evident.
• As was the case with the circuit breakers, the lightning arresters at Aurora
substation were also affected by the moulds on the silicon skirting. This is due
to the coastal climate where the substation is located.
• Bird nests were identified on the Dinaledi No.1 400kV feeder bay at Bighorn
substation.
Current transformers
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 17 of 36
• Most current transformers are in good condition in the substations assessed
(note: The current transformers at Craighall substation are in the GIS chamber
and not visible).
• The current transformers at Aurora substation are increasingly ageing
especially at 50kV. Eskom advised that a “CT Care” plan has been developed
to ensure that ageing CTs do not malfunction, which includes extensive tests.
• The current transformers at Muldersvlei are in good condition but require
cleaning.
Voltage transformers
6
4
Ratings
Substations
Page 18 of 36
5.20. Isolators
Isolators
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The earth switches are in general good condition and the earth linkages are
not open.
• Mould growth also affected the earth switches at Aurora substation.
• There was a bird nest on the earth switch of the 275kV transformer No. 3 at
Bighorn substation.
Page 19 of 36
• The earth switch in capacitor bank No. 1 had a bird nest at Luckhoff
substation but the isolator was in good condition.
Coupling capacitors
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The coupling capacitors in the majority of the substations were in a very good
condition.
• Minor steel structure maintenance (painting) is required on the Droerivier No.
2 feeder.
Line traps
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 20 of 36
• The line traps were in a general fair condition for most of the substations
assessed but there is bird nest problem.
• The 400kV Juno No. 1 feeder is affected by mould formation due to the
coastal conditions at Aurora substation. In addition, the line traps do not have
the netting that prevents birds from nesting.
• Bird nests were also present at Bighorn substation on Pluto No. 1, Spitskop
and Dinaledi feeders.
• Bird nests were also present in the line traps at Craighall substation.
• There were also bird nests at Luckhoff substation due to the large number of
birds attracted by the warmth of the capacitor banks.
• The netting on the line traps at Muldersvlei substation and a large number of
the line traps are over 40 year old.
4
Ratings
Substations
• Bus bars, conductors and clamps in the yards of most of the substations were
in very good condition.
• At Illovo and Muldersvlei substation, the insulation of the earthing conductors
on the isolators were burnt but not broken.
Page 21 of 36
5.25. Power cables
Power cables
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
• Samples of the exposed power cables assessed in all the substations were in
very good condition. No anomalies were evident.
Battery chargers
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
• Most of the battery chargers were in good condition in all the substations. Back
up chargers were available for both the 50V and 220V chargers.
• The handwritten signage on one of the chargers at Bighorn substation needs
to be rectified.
Page 22 of 36
5.27. Batteries
Batteries
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
3
2
1
0
Substations
• The tele control equipment was in a general good condition in most of the
substations.
Page 23 of 36
• Minor work is required on the cable trenches at Aurora substation.
• The air condition in the tele control room was not working. Some lights were
also not working and some parts were not adequately illuminated. In addition,
some cables were weeping compound.
• A number of panels were open in the tele control room at Muldersvlei. The air
condition in the tele control room was also not working. Eskom staff advised
that there was a programme to replace the air conditioning.
Control&Protection Panels
6
4
Ratings
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Substations
• The control and protection panels in almost all the substations were in a good
condition.
• The voltmeter on transformer No. 21 was not working at Bighorn substation.
4
Ratings
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Substations
Page 24 of 36
• The protection relays at all the substations were in a general good condition.
• Some substations have obsolete protection relays but they are still
operational.
Control cables
6
5
4
Ratings
3
2
1
0
Substations
3
2
1
0
Substations
Page 25 of 36
• The GIS plant and bushings at Craighall substation were in very general good
condition. There was no evidence of pollution or gas leaks in the GIS room.
The formation of gases in transformers (and other oil immersed equipment) can
lead to catastrophic failure with major economic and safety risks. The formation
of gases is attributable to two principal causes namely electrical disturbances
and thermal decomposition. The cost of transformers is very high especially at
transmission level, therefore the cost of monitoring of the transformer
maintenance and the environment it operates in is justified when compared with
the replacement cost and interruption in power supply.
6.2. Approach
The NERSA team assessed the DGA results based on the following
parameters:
Page 26 of 36
ii. a comparison of the Eskom’s gas concentration alarm levels with the latest
results for the seven gases (Hydrogen, Methane, Ethane, Ethylene,
Acetylene, Carbon Monoxide and Carbon Dioxide) in at least 2 oil filled
equipment for each substation namely transformers and/or reactors; and
Table 7: Comparison of Eskom alarm levels with international standards for oil-immersed
equipment
Gas Dornenburg IEEE Bureau Eskom
Stritt of Reclam. Alarm
Hydrogen (H2) 200 100 500 150
Methane (CH4) 50 120 125 150
Ethane (C2H6) 35 65 75 100
Ethylene (C2H4) 80 50 175 100
Acetylene (C2H2) 5 35 7 15
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 500 350 750 750
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 6 000 2 500 10 000 10000
It is evident from the above table that the Eskom gas limits are in line with the
international benchmarks and will ensure that any fault gases trends are
interpreted correctly. In some cases, the Eskom limits are more stringent than
the international benchmarks.
The DGA results were received for all the oil-immersed equipment such as
transformers and reactors. However, the team selected two equipment per
substation (except for Craighall and Poseidon where only one was chosen, and
Luckhoff where there is no oil-immersed equipment) to analyse the frequency
of sampling as well as the turn around times for sample sent to the laboratory
for analysis. In addition, the levels of the seven gases referred to above were
compared to the Eskom limits that would trigger an alarm to determine if there
was an exceedance of the latter.
Page 27 of 36
iii. Bighorn transformer No. 21;
iv. Bighorn transformer No. 1;
v. Craighall transformer No.2;
vi. Illovo transformer No.1;
vii. Muldersvlei transformer No. 3;
viii. Muldersvlei SVC transformer (Red phase);
ix. Poseidon transformer No.3;
x. Poseidon power reactor No.3;
xi. Sol transformer No. 11; and
xii. Sol transformer No. 4.
Table 8: Summary of frequency of routine oil sampling from selected oil-immersed equipment
Oil Immersed
Equipment Observations and Conclusions
Aurora transformer No. • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
11 as required by the standard.
Aurora shunt reactor • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
No. 1 as required by the standard.
Bighorn transformer • Sampling was not done consistently at times with
No. 21 sampling being done at 7-month intervals in 2010
and 2011. In addition, sampling results between
December 2011 and October 2012 are not available.
Bighorn transformer • Sampling of this transformer was done once in 2009
No. 1 and 2010 in November and December respectively.
Only in 2011 was sampling was done as required by
the standard. Subsequently sampling was done once
in October 2012 and after that no sample results
were available. Eskom advised unit failed in April
2013 hence the missing results.
Craighall transformer • The sampling of this transformer was done
No.2 consistently and during the same months of January
and July annually.
Illovo transformer No.1 • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
as required by the standard.
Illovo SVC transformer • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
(Blue phase) as required by the standard with minimal variations
between the dates of sampling.
Muldersvlei • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
transformer No. 3 (April and October) as required by the standard.
Page 28 of 36
Muldersvlei SVC • Sampling was done in line with standard in the
transformer (Red majority of cases. Missing set of results between the
phase) period March 2013 and January 2014 were later
provided by Eskom.
Poseidon transformer • There are no sampling results for the period February
No.3 2013 to 15 July 2014 but sampling was done
consistently during the rest of the period under
review.
Poseidon power • Sampling was done consistently but there are no
reactor No.3 sampling results for the period 22 January and 17
January 2014 showing inconsistent sampling.
Sol transformer No. 11 • Sampling was done consistently at 6-month intervals
as required by the standard.
Sol transformer No. 4 • In the majority of cases sampling was done
consistently at 6-month intervals as required by the
standard. However, there was one case between
2011 and 2012 where samples were taken over nine-
month interval instead of six months.
Whilst not all the oil-immersed equipment DGA results were analysed, the
sample shows that in the majority of cases, the 6-month routine sampling
interval for in-service units was done as per the standard. However, there are
several cases where inconsistent sampling is evident. The worst case is for
Bighorn substation where sampling results are only available up to 2012 for one
of the cases.
6.3.3. Comparison of the different gas levels with Eskom alarm level
A comparison of Eskom’s gas concentration alarm levels with the latest results
for the seven fault gases Hydrogen, Methane, Ethane, Ethylene, Acetylene,
Carbon Monoxide, and Carbon Dioxide for the selected substations in Section
6.3 above, is summarised in the following section.
Each gas concentration is plotted against the Eskom alarm level for that
particular gas. It is important to note that the alarm level will signal an
investigation by Eskom.
The summary for the comparison of the actual levels at the time of the audit
and the Eskom alarm level, for each of the gases, are as detailed below:
Page 29 of 36
i. Hydrogen
H2
150
160
140
120
100
(ppm)
80
60 45
28 33 30 27
40
4 7 10 7 9
20 0 0 0
0
The sampling results for the hydrogen gas levels for all the selected oil-
immersed equipment indicates that the levels are well below the threshold of
150ppm. No risk associated with hydrogen gas production is identified.
Hydrogen is normally produced where there is arcing corona.
ii. Methane
CH4
250 215
200
150
150
(ppm)
109
100
50 6 20 14
3 0 0 0 2 4 2 0
0
Page 30 of 36
The methane gas levels for the majority of the oil-immersed equipment are
below the threshold except for Bighorn transformer 21, which exceeded the
150-ppm level. This requires further investigation as it may indicate sparking
within the transformer.
iii. Ethane
C2H6
120 100
100 85
80
(ppm)
60 38
40 25
20 7 2 8 1 3 4 1
0 0 0
0
The sampling results for ethane gas levels for all the selected oil-immersed
equipment indicates that the levels are significantly below the threshold of
100ppm. No risk associated with local overheating is therefore identified at this
moment.
iv. Ethylene
C2H4
120 100
100
80
(ppm)
60
40 20 15 10 14 11 8
20 2 0 0 3 1 0 3
0
Page 31 of 36
The sampling results for ethylene gas levels for all the selected oil-immersed
equipment indicates that the levels are significantly below the threshold of
100ppm. No risk associated with severe overheating is therefore identified at
the moment.
v. Acetylene
C2H2
15
16
14
12
10
(ppm)
8 5
6 3
4
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
The sampling results for the acetylene gas levels for all the selected oil-
immersed equipment indicates that the levels are significantly below the
threshold of 15ppm. In some cases, no traces of the gas were detected. No risk
associated with acetylene gas (typically arcing) production is present.
CO
900 808
750 750
800
700 611
600 519 471 496
(ppm)
Page 32 of 36
The threshold of 750ppm for carbon monoxide was not exceeded in most of the
cases except for Bighorn transformer No. 21, which exceeded the alarm level
marginally. The same transformer also exceeded the methane threshold and
this warrants further investigation as per the oil management standard. Carbon
monoxide production typically indicates severe overloading of the transformer.
CO2
12000 10000
10000
8000
(ppm)
The graph clearly indicates that the carbon dioxide gas concentration levels for
all the substations are well below the alarm level of 10000ppm. No risk of failure
emanating from the production of carbon dioxide is therefore imminent.
The levels of dissolved gases in the sample of transformers and reactors were
mostly under the Eskom alarm threshold. This indicates that the transformers
or reactors are generally in good condition and at low risk of failure due to
internal faults. However, there are few cases where the thresholds are
exceeded especially transformer No. 21 at Bighorn substation. This is
compounded by the fact that sampling was not done consistently.
7.1. Documentation
Substation documentation was requested at each site and inspected. In
most of the substations, the documentation was available for inspection
and up to date. Single line diagrams for both the HV circuits, tele control
equipment and protection schemes were also made available.
Page 33 of 36
Records of infra-red scan results of the substation were also made
available and inspected. The tests were done at intervals stated in the
Eskom Standard for scanning of hotspots and reports were kept on site
for further monitoring or repair where necessary.
• Illovo substation – the workers are not individually signing out once
the work has been completed. In some instances, the Authorised
Person signs out on behalf of the workers while in other cases the
workers sign out and the Authorised Person countersigns. Eskom
undertook to consider revising the workers register form.
Page 34 of 36
actually done over a defined period. It is important to note that the jobs
carry the same weighting regardless of whether it is outage or non-
outage dependant.
The assessment is done per grid as well as for the overall transmission
grid. The current annual target as set by Eskom transmission is 97% for
both the individual grids and summated for the whole grid. As at 08
October 2014, out of a total of 21 958 jobs issued in the SAP system,
21 496 (representing 97.9% of the total) were completed spread across
the 9 individual grids and Apollo as shown in the Table 9 below:
100.0% 99.4%
All jobs issued YTD (%)
99.3%
98.7% 98.9%
99.0%
97.9%
98.0% 97.6%
97.2%
96.7% 96.7%
97.0% 96.2%
96.0%
95.0%
94.0%
% Completed Target
As can be seen from the graph, only three grids did not manage to reach the
target of 97%. The three that failed to reach the target all performed above 96%,
which is very close to the target.
The maintenance performance based on the planned vs actual maintenance
indicates that Eskom transmission is executing the work as planned except in
a few instances. Backlogs are also traced and recorded. In addition, the SAP
information audit is audited for correctness of data, which guards against any
possible errors intentional or otherwise.
Page 35 of 36
The team noted the good plant maintenance performance while recommending
that the findings of the audit be included in the maintenance and/or
refurbishment plans of Eskom transmission if they have not been included
already.
8. CONCLUSIONS
Detailed findings and recommendations of the audit for each Licensee are
presented in the individual audit reports of the Licensee.
From the audit findings, the following conclusions are made:
(a) The licensee is fully aware of the requirements of the licence conditions
and that of the South African Grid Code.
(b) Most of the equipment and plant in the substations is in a general good
condition, well maintained and tidy.
(d) The overall substation ratings (based on the average of the equipment
ratings for each substation) indicate that the substations are in a general
good condition as shown below in Figure 42 below:
3
2
1
0
Substation
Page 36 of 36