Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Submitted by
Suma Gunda
Roll number:164264
Keertana Upparapalli
Roll number:164167
NIT-WARANGAL
1
INDEX
Topic Pg.No.
Title 01
Index 02
Abstract 03
Introduction 03
Wavelet decomposition 05
Feature Extraction 06
Experimental Results 08
Conclusion 09
References 09
2
Abstract:
Introduction:
Epilepsy can be potentially life threatening with brain failure, heart and
lung failure, head trauma due to accidents and sudden unexpected
death. Even understated epileptic can cause insignificant harm in the
brain. Long-term problems such as fall in intelligence quotient (IQ),
depression, suicide, Social problems may lead to reduce the quality of
life. So the diagnosis of epilepsy is the most important in the existing
development of research. The main challenge of this work is to detect
the epilepsy seizure in order to maintain independency in patient’s life
and also to help person with epilepsy to lead full and productive life.
Epilepsy is one of the common neurological disorder that affects the
nervous system and is characterised by the transient and unexpected
3
electrical disturbance of the brain. All brain functions including feeling,
seeing, thinking and moving muscles depend on electrical signals
passed between nerve cells in the brain. Epilepsy is also known as a
seizure disorder. A seizure occurs when too many nerve cells in the
brain “fire” too quickly causing an “electrical storm”.
According to the WHO , there are about 50 million people worldwide who
are suffering from epilepsy. In about 70% of people with epilepsy, the
cause is not known and in 30% of the people most common causes are
due to head trauma, infection of brain tissue, brain tumour and stroke,
heredity and prenatal disturbance of brain development. The
electroencephalogram (EEG) is the most influential technique in the
detection of epileptic seizures. EEG records the electric activity of the
cerebral cortex in the brain and it is used to measure or diagnose brain
diseases. EEG monitoring is an important factor when identifying
conditions, particularly of patients with epilepsy. The recording data of
the human EEGs are carried out by placing the electrodes on the scalp,
voltage range of the scalp EEG lie between 10 and 100 lV. The main
concern in EEG analysis is how to differentiate seizure from normal EEG
signal. Conventionally, seizure activities are visually inspected from EEG
signals by trained physicians. But this is a time-consuming and
cumbersome in case of long EEG recordings. So, a rapid detection and
classification of seizure activity would give a great support to quantitative
analysis and interpretation. In modern years, different methods have
been developed to automatically classify the normal or abnormal EEG
signals without spending hours for visual inspection.
The process of automatic classification is achieved using pattern
recognition. The various stages in pattern recognition are feature
extraction and classification. Feature extraction is a technique for
extracting the hidden characteristics of the signal such as amplitude,
frequency, mean value, etc., to interpret the signal. These features are
fed as input to the classifier to differentiate normal and epileptic
seizures.. However, the classification performance is mostly dependent
on the features that are being used to characterise the original EEG.
Therefore, feature extraction is one of the most significant constituents of
pattern recognition. It suggestively contributes to the performance of the
4
classifier and reduces data size without losing its characteristic power.
Thus, it is important to propose an effective feature extraction method
instead of designing the structure of a complex classifier.
Wavelet Decomposition:
Feature Extraction:
The extracted wavelet coefficients provide a compact representation that
shows the energy distribution of the EEG signal in time and frequency.
The following statistical features were used to represent the time
frequency distribution of the EEG signals:
1) Maximum of the wavelet coefficients in each sub-band.
2) Minimum of the wavelet coefficients in each sub-band.
3) Standard deviation of the wavelet coefficients in each sub-band.
4)Energy of the entire signal.
The data was acquired from chbmit database.The DWT was performed
at 6 levels, and resulted in six sub-bands: d1-d5 and a6 (detail and
approximation coefficients respectively).For each of these sub-bands,
we extracted four measures of dispersion, yielding a total of 19 attributes
per sample window.
6
Machine learning classification algorithm:
Algorithm
It should also be noted that all three distance measures are only
valid for continuous variables. In the instance of categorical
variables the Hamming distance must be used. It also brings up
the issue of standardization of the numerical variables between 0
and 1 when there is a mixture of numerical and categorical
variables in the dataset.Since our classifiers use supervised
learning, we must also provide the outputs, which was simply a
class label.
7
Experimental Results:
The proposed diagnostic system consists of a preprocessing
/feature selection and one classifier subsystem. Duabechies
Wavelets order-4 with 6 levels have been used for pre-processing
in order to achieve the same dimensionality reduction of wavelet
he 19 inputs correspond to the four features times
coefficients. T
the number of wavelet decomposition (D1-D5 & A6). The results
using K-NN were encouraging. The classification accuracy for this
two-class problem found to be 88%.
From the result of experiments, the average of TPR is 91% that is
to say, nearly most of the EEG signal on seizure status can be
classified into seizure status.
The method using the support vector machine(SVM) is frequently
used for the traditional epileptic seizure recognition because SVM
could map the feature vector into the space with the higher
dimensions using the kernel function for the classification. To
compare with the K-NN algorithm mentioned in this project, the
method combined SVM with the manually selected features is
validated on the same dataset and the accuracy was found to be
76.1%.
8
CONCLUSION :
The result of experiments shows that the algorithm of single
channel proposed in the project has a high accuracy(88%), a good
TPR(91%). Meanwhile, the parameters that might influence the
performance of the algorithm are discussed, and the proper
parameters are chosen to match the model. Also, the comparison
with the method using the SVM combined with the manually
selected features shows that, the method mentioned using the
K-NN has better performance.
HE COMPARISON OF THE RESULT BETWEEN THE METHOD USING
T
THE SVM AND K-NN ALGORITHM.
REFERENCES :
9
10
11