Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

G.R. No. 211140.

January 12, 2016 ISSUE: WON a petition for mandamus can be issued to compel
PETITIONER: Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco Speaker Belmonte and Sec-gen. Barua-Yap to perform the specific
RESPONDENTS: Hon. Speaker Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr., Secretary acts sought by Velasco.
General Marilyn B. Barua-Yap and Regina Ongsiako Reyes
RULING: YES. Speaker Belmonte and Sec.Gen Barua-Yap are legally
RECIT READY: duty-bound to recognize Velasco as the duly elected Member of the
Petition for Mandamus under Rules 65 of Rules of Court by Velasco HOR. The administration of oath and the registration of Velasco in
against respondents Belmonte, Barua-Yap, and Reyes. the Roll of Members of the HOR for the lone district of Province of
Marinduque is no longer a matter of discretion or judgement since
Prior to the May 2013 elections, a certain Joseph Socorro Tan of Velasco is the proclaimed winning candidate. Reyes’s COC was
Municipality of Torrijos, Marinduque filed with the COMELEC a cancelled due to her ineligibility to run as representative, for without
petition to cancel the Certificate of Candidacy of respondent Reyes a valid COC, Reyes could not be treated as a candidate in the election
for the position of Representative of lone district of Marinduque. He and much less as a duly proclaimed winner. Her proclamation by the
alleged that Reyes made several material misrepresentations in her PBOC on May 18, 2013 has no basis. As such, there is no legal ground
COC. COMELEC First Division granted the petition and subsequently for her to serve as member of the HOR. Velasco is the rightful
cancelled the COC of Reyes. However, the May 13, 2013 elections representative of the Lone District of the Province of Marinduque;
was held while Reyes’s Motion for Reconsideration was pending. hence, entitled to a writ of mandamus.
Despite the COMELEC En Banc’s affirmation the First Division’s
decision, the Marinduque PBOC proclaimed Reyes as the winning WHEREFORE, the petition for mandamus is GRANTED.
candidate. In the meantime, the COMELEC Resolution became final
and executory. Notwithstanding the issuances of COMELEC, Reyes DOCTRINE/LEGAL BASIS: Electoral Tribunals. Section 17, Art. VI,
took the oath and assumed membership of the HOR. Petitioner Philippine Constitution.
Velasco filed a petition for certiorari before the COMELEC, assailing
the proceedings of PBOS and the proclamation of Reyes null and FACTS:
void. COMELEC denied the said petition. The COMELEC En Banc,
however, reversed the aforesaid decision and granted the petition of  October 12, 2012 – Joseph Socorro Tan filed with the
Velasco. In a separate decision, it also ordered the reconstitution of COMELEC a petition to cancel the COC of respondent Reyes
the Marinduque PBOC and proclaimed Velasco as the winning for the position of Representative of lone district of
candidate for the contested position. Petitioner alleges that despite Marinduque. Tan alleged that Reyes made several material
several letters and formal requests sent to Speaker Belmonte and misrepresentations in her COC namely: 1) that she is a
Sec.Gen. Barua-Yap to honor the decisions of COMELEC, they refused resident of Brgy. Lupac, Boac, Marinduque, 2) that she is a
to recognize him, and administer his oath and register his name in natural-born Filipino, 3) that she is not a permanent resident
the Roll of Members to replace that of Reyes’s. Hence, this instant of, or an immigrant to, a foreign country, 4) that her date of
petition for mandamus.
birth is July 3, 1964, 5) that her civil status is single, 6) that  June 28, 2013—Tan filed a Motion for Execution of the March
she is eligible for the office she seeks to be elected to. 27 and June 5 COMELEC Resolution and prayed that Velasco
 March 27, 2013 – COMELEC First Division granted the be proclaimed as the winner of the May 2013 elections for
petition and cancelled the COC of Reyes. Reyes filed a Motion Representative of lone district of Marinduque.
for Reconsideration. However, this remained pending when Notwithstanding the prior decisions and petitions, Reyes
the national and local elections was held on May 13, 2013. assumed the position as member of HOR beginning June 30.
 May 14, 2013—The COMELEC En Banc affirmed the prior  July 9, 2013—COMELEC reversed its June 19 decision denying
decision of the COMELEC First Division. the petition of Velasco and declared null and void the
 May 18, 2012—despite the COMELEC’s resolution, the proclamation of Reyes. It also proclaimed Velasco as the
Marinduque Provincial Board of Canvassers (PBOC) winning candidate.
proclaimed Reyes the winner of the election.  July 10, 2013—COMELEC granted Tan’s June 28 petition and
 May 31, 2013 – Petitioner Velasco filed an Election Protest ordered the reconstitution of the Marinduque PBOC and
Ad Cautelam against Reyes before the House of proclamation of Velasco as the duly elected Representative
Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET). On the same day, of Lone District of Marinduque.
and before the same body, a certain Christopher Matienzo  July 16, 2013—Velasco was formally proclaimed as the
also filed a Petition for Quo Warranto Ad Cautelam against Representative of Lone District of Marinduque by the newly
Reyes. constituted Marinduque PBOC.
 June 5, 2013 – COMELEC issued a Certificate of Finality,  July 22,2013—The 16th Congress held its first joint session
holding its May 14, 2013 resolution final and executory in the and Reyes, along with other duly recognized representatives,
absence of a restraining order from SC. took her oath before Speaker Belmonte Jr.
 June 7, 2013—Speaker Belmonte Jr. administered the taking  July 23, 2013—Reyes filed a Manifestation and Notice of
of oath of office of Reyes. Withdrawal of Petition without waiver of her arguments,
 June 10, 2013—Reyes filed a petition for certiorari before SC, positions, defenses/causes of action as will be articulated in
assailing the COMELEC decision on Tan’s petition, denial of the HRET which is now the proper forum. Reyes also filed
her motion for reconsideration, and the June 5 Certificate of another two subsequent MRs but both were denied by the
Finality. On the other hand, Velasco also filed a petition for SC.
certiorari before the COMELEC, assailing the proceedings of  November 29, 2013—Velasco filed a Motion for Issuance of
PBOC and the proclamation of Reyes null and void. This Writ of Execution before the COMELEC.
however, was subsequently denied by COMELEC, and at the  December 5, 2013 and Janurary 14, 2014—Velasco sent
same time, Reyes’s petition was also dismissed. Reyes letters demanding that he be allowed to assume the
 SC held that Reyes cannot assert that it is the HRET which has position as representative. On December 10, 2013, he also
jurisdiction over her since she is not yet considered a wrote a letter to Speaker Belmonte stating the same.
member of HOR.  December 11, 2013—COMELEC, in response to Velasco’s
November 29 petition, ordered that its Resolutions,
Certificate of Finality, and Velasco’s Certificate of of their ministerial duties, excluding him from the
Proclamation be sent to Speaker Belmonte.\ enjoyment of his right
 February 4, 2014—Velasco wrote again to Speaker Velasco -that the “continued usurpation and unlawful holding of
reiterating the above-mentioned request but to no avail. such position by respondent Reyes has worked injustice
 February 6, 2014—Velasco wrote Sec-gen Barua-Yap and serious prejudice to him in that she has already
reiterating his request to delete the name of Reyes in the Roll received the salaries, allowances, binuses, and
of Members and register his name in her place as the duly emoluments that pertain to the position of Marinduque
elected representative of Marinduque. representative since June 30, 2013 up to the present…”
 Petitioner alleges that despite all letters and requests to
Speaker Belmonte and Sec-gen Baruya, they refused to RESPONDENT: REYES. The petition is actually one for quo warranto
recognize him as the duly elected representative of the lone and not mandamus given that it essentially seeks a declaration that
district of Marinduque; and that Reyes, in the face of the she usurped the subject office. She argues that, being a collateral
numerous written demands, continues to discharge the attack on a title to public office, the petition must be dismissed as
duties of the position. Thus, this instant petition. enunciated by the court in several cases.

ISSUE: WON a petition for mandamus can be issued to compel Reyes questions the jurisdiction of the court over quo warranto cases
Speaker Belmonte and Sec-gen. Barua-Yap to perform the involving HOR. She argues that several jurisprudence have already
specific acts sought by Velasco ruled that it is the HOR Electoral Tribunal that has the sole and
exclusive jurisdiction over all contests relating to election, returns,
RELEVANT ARGUMENTS and qualifications of the members of HOR. She went further that
 Petitioner: Velasco contends that he “has a well-defined COMELEC is divested of jurisdiction upon her proclamation as the
and clear legal right and basis to warrant the grant of the winning candidate, as in fact, the HRET had already assumed
writ of mandamus”, as provided by the decisions of the jurisdiction over quo warranto cases filed against Reyes by several
COMELEC nullifying Reyes’s proclamation and individuals.
recognizing him as the winning candidate.
Reyes concludes that this Court is “devoid of original jurisdiction to
-That it is the ministerial duty of respondent Speaker annul her proclamation” and that Velasco as second placer cannot be
Belmonte to administer his oath and allow him to assume declared winner as he was not the choice of the people of
and exercise the prerogatives of being the representative Marinduque; Velasco is stopped from asserting the jurisdiction of this
of Marinduque, and of respondent Barua-Yap to register court over her because he filed an election protest ad cautelam in the
his name as the duly elected member of HOR and delete HRET on May 31,2014.
the name of Reyes from the Roll of Members. That both
respondents are unlawfully neglecting the performance SOLICITOR-GENERAL (FOR BELMONTE AND BARUA-YAP). Upon
Reyes’s proclamation, exclusive jurisdiction to resolve election
contests…[is] vested in the HRET. Hence, until and unless the HRET RULING: YES. Speaker Belmonte and Sec.Gen Barua-Yap are legally
grants any quo warranto petition or election protest filed against duty-bound to recognize Velasco as the duly elected Member of the
respondent Reyes, and such HRET resolution or resolutions become HOR. The administration of oath and the registration of Velasco in
final and executory, respondent Reyes may not be restrained from the Roll of Members of the HOR for the lone district of Province of
exercising the prerogatives of Marinduque representative… Marinduque is no longer a matter of discretion or judgement since
Additionally, the second placer in the may 13, 2013 elections, cannot Velasco is the proclaimed winning candidate. Reyes’s COC was
validly assume the post of Marinduque representative. Hence, cancelled due to her ineligibility to run as representative, for without
respondents Speaker Belmonte and Sec.Gen. Barua-Yap may not be a valid COC, Reyes could not be treated as a candidate in the election
compelled by mandamus to, respectively, administer the proper oath and much less as a duly proclaimed winner. Her proclamation by the
to the petitioner and register the latter’s name in the roll of members PBOC on May 18, 2013 has no basis. Reyes has absolutely no legal
of the house. basis to serve as member of the HOR, and she has no legal personality
to be recognized as party-respondent at a quo warranto proceeding
If the jurisdiction of the COMELEC were to be retained until the before the HRET. Velasco is the rightful representative of the Lone
assumption of office of the winner, then there would be obviously a District of the Province of Marinduque; hence, entitled to a writ of
clash of jurisdiction between HRET and the COMELEC…HRET’s mandamus.
jurisdiction begins only after assumption of office, at noon of June 30
following election, then quo warranto petitions and election protests WHEREFORE, the petition for mandamus is GRANTED.
filed on after said date would be dismissed outright by the HRET
under its own rules for having been filed out of time, where the DOCTRINE/LEGAL BASIS: Electoral Tribunals. Section 17, Art. VI,
winners have already been proclaimed within the period after the Philippine Constitution.
May elections and up to June 14.

***HRET, however, promulgated a resolution on December 14. 2015


dismissing the twin quo warranto filed by Reyes. It ruled that the
constitutional mandate of the HRET is to be the sole judge of all
contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of the
member of the house; but its jurisdiction begins only after the
candidate is considered member of the HOR—which is met by the
following requisites: 1)valid proclamation 2)proper oath and 3)
assumption of office. Reyes’s proclamation was nullified by
COMELEC, as such, the Tribunal is without power to assume
jurisdiction over her petitions. She cannot be considered a member
of the HOR.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen