Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PII: S1553-4650(19)30006-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.020
Reference: JMIG 3724
Please cite this article as: Oshri Barel MD, MHA, FRANZCOG , Ramy Rahamim Suday MD ,
Jonathan Stanleigh MD , Mordechai Pansky MD , Laparoscopic removal of an abdominal preg-
nancy in the pelvic sidewall, The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2019), doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.12.020
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service
to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and
all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
––Laparoscopic removal of an abdominal pregnancy in the pelvic sidewall
Authors:
Barel Oshri MD, MHA, FRANZCOG department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assuta Ashdod
University Hospital. Ashdod, Israel. Affiliated with the faculty of Health Sciences. Ben Gurion
University. barelod@gmail.com.
Suday Ramy Rahamim, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assuta Ashdod University
Hospital. Ashdod, Israel. suday.ramy@gmail.com
Stanleigh Jonathan MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assuta Ashdod University
Hospital. Ashdod, Israel. jonathans@assuta.co.il
Pansky Mordechai MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Assuta Ashdod University
Hospital. Ashdod, Israel. mordechaipa@assuta.co.il
T
All authors of this article did not report any potential conflict of interest
––Laparoscopic removal of an abdominal pregnancy in the pelvic sidewall
IP
CR
Objective: To present the presentation, diagnosis and management of a patient with abdominal pregnancy and
US
Design: A descriptive study (Canadian task force level III) approved by our local institutional review board.
Patient: On May 15th 2018, a Gravida-3 Para-2, 37-year-old asymptomatic patient was referred to the
gynecological emergency department due to a suspected ectopic pregnancy. The patient had no relevant
ED
medical or surgical history. Her obstetric history consisted of two spontaneous vaginal deliveries and no other
significant gynecological history. Her menses were regular, every month. Her Last menstrual period was six
PT
weeks prior to presentation. βHCG a day prior to presentation was 24,856IU/L. Physical examination was
unremarkable except for a small amount of brownish vaginal discharge. A transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)
CE
exam on presentation did not demonstrate an intra-uterine gestational sac, the examination revealed a
AC
gestational sac and a fetus next to the right adnexa, with a crown-rump length of 1.3cm, consistent with 7+3
gestational weeks. There was a minimal amount of fluid in the Pouch of Douglas.
Intervention: Due to an extra-uterine pregnancy with high βHCG values, laparoscopic operative management
was chosen. Upon entrance to the abdominal cavity, a normal uterus and two ovaries and fallopian tubes were
observed. A small to moderate amount of blood was present in the pouch of Douglas. Over the right
uterosacral ligament, a three to four centimeter distension was noticed. Following delicate probing of the area
moderate to severe bleeding commenced, this was initially controlled with local pressure and a oxidized
regenerated cellulose (Surgicell®). An intra-operative TVUS identified an abdominal pregnancy in the right
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
pelvic sidewall. The gestational sac was completely dissected and removed following uretrolysis and
separation of the right ureter from the specimen. Local injection of vasopressin was also used. βHCG before
surgery was 19,008IU/L, at post-operative day 1 the value decreased to 6339IU/L. Patient was discharged in
good condition at the 2nd post-operative day. A final histopathologic report confirmed a gestational sac.
Measurement and main results: A patient referred for a tubal ectopic pregnancy was eventually diagnosed
with an abdominal pregnancy and was treated operatively with a complete excision of the abdominal
T
Conclusion: An abdominal pregnancy is a rare kind of ectopic pregnancy with a reported incidence of
IP
1:10,000 – 1:30,000 pregnancies, and about 1% of ectopic pregnancies. It carries a high risk for maternal
CR
morbidity and mortality. Many different locations at different gestational ages have been reported in the
literature including in the Pouch of Douglas; pelvic sidewall; bowel; broad ligament; omentum and spleen.
US
Combined with the rarity of this type of pregnancy its diagnosis is challenging and treatment not uniform. The
location of the growing fetal tissue may endanger the patient’s life as it could be close to vital anatomic
AN
structures. In our case, a gestational sac was very close to the right ureter. In this case, we opted to surgically
Works Cited
PT
Bohiltea, R., Radoi , V., Tufan, C., Horhoianu, I., & Bohiltea, C. (2015). Abdominal pregnancy - Case presentation.
Cosentino, F., Rossitto, C., Turco, L., Gueli Alletti , S., Vascone, C., Di Meglio, L., . . . Malzoni, M. (2017). Laparoscopic
AC
Hailu et al. (2017). Advanced abdominal pregnancy, with live fetus and severe preeclampsia, case report. BMC
Yoder, N., Reshef, T., & J. Ryan, M. (2016). Abdominal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and single embryo
transfer: a case report and systematic review. Reproductive biology and endocrinology, 14(69).