Sie sind auf Seite 1von 20

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VI - Western Visayas
Schools Division of Iloilo
Santa Barbara National Comprehensive High School
Roosevelt Street, Santa Barbara, Iloilo

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: CLAIRE S. JUAREZ Name of Rater: LOURDES A. MONTEFRIO, D.S.Ed.


Position: Master Teacher II Position: PRINCIPAL III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SANTA BARBARA NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: MARCH 29, 2019
Rating Period: JUNE 2018 - MARCH 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OU

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality No acceptable
Services Knowledge applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was Modeled effective
and Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5 of 8
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown evidenced by MOV 1
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and and supported by
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1 any 1 of the other
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV MOV given
MOV given MOV given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed action No acceptable Proposed action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Proposed action No acceptable Proposed action
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV research with evidence was research with
MOV colleagues shown colleagues
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable Demonstrated
Services Knowledge applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was effective teaching
and Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown strategies to promote
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and critical and creative
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as thinking, as well as
as other higher-order well as other well as other well as other well as other other higher-order
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order higher-order higher-order thinking skills as
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 a rating of 7
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 4 or more


more lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidently shown evidence was lessons as evidently
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported by any of supported by any 1
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 the other MOV of the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given given
given given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality No acceptable
Services Environment colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and evidence was
and Diversity share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown Modeled and shared
of Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroom classroom effective classroom
management of management management management management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks done
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different in different physical
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments asenvironments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5 a rating of 7
environments.environm Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 3 lessons
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported supported by MOV 1
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any and any 1 of the
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other other acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable Exhibited effective
Services Environment and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was and constructive
and Diversity behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown behavior
of Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments environments environments shown
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 with a
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 rating of 7

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown as observed in at
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson least 4 lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown department or grade
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others level to share lesson
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown shown in MOV 1 and
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no supported by any
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV with others
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and
Services and Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning process
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as as shown in MOV 1
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown evidenced by MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV and 2 and supported
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown evidenced by MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV and 2 and supported
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 by any 1 of the other
of the other of the other of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable Consistently
Services and Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was participated in
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown LACs/FGDs/meeting
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner s to discuss
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as teacher/learner
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the feedback to enrich
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted instruction as shown
shown in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 4


collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was collaborative reviews
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown of teacher and
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV supported by any 1
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 of the acceptable
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4


teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively assessment tools shown collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data as shown in the assessment data as
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV shown MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable Consistently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the in the effective evidence was skills in the effective
of learner needs, effective effective effective communication of shown communication of
progress and communication of communication of communication of learner needs and learner needs and
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and progress to progress to parents/
stakeholders, including progress to progress to progress to parents/ guardians guardians as shown
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians as shown in the in the MOV
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 Submitted at least 4
of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV of the acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory CLAIRE S. JUAREZ MA. LEAH S. UMADHAY, D.R. Dev. LOURDES A.
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Master Teacher II Asst. Principal II P
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Appr
of the Philippines
ent of Education
- Western Visayas
Division of Iloilo
l Comprehensive High School
et, Santa Barbara, Iloilo

AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

LOURDES A. MONTEFRIO, D.S.Ed.


PRINCIPAL III
MARCH 29, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
5 5 5.000 0.375

3 3 3 3.000 0.225
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
4 4 4.000 0.3

4 4 4.000 0.3
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
5 4 4.500 0.338

5 4 4.500 0.338

4 5 4.500 0.338
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
4 4 4.000 0.3

4 5 4.500 0.338

4 4 4.000 0.300
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
4 5 4.5 0.338

4 5 4.500 0.338

4 5 4.500 0.450

Very Satisfactory 4.278


LOURDES A. MONTEFRIO, D.S. Ed.
Principal III
Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VI - Western Visayas
Schools Division of Iloilo
Santa Barbara National Comprehensive High School
Roosevelt Street, Santa Barbara, Iloilo

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV
Name of Employee: CLAIRE S. JUAREZ Name of Rater: LEAH S. UMADHAY, D.R.Dev.
Position: Master Teacher II Position: Asst. Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Iloilo Date of Review: March 29, 2019
Rating Period: School Year 2018 - 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 3 3 3 3.000 0.225
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.338
Objective 6 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.338
Objective 7 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.338
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.338
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.338
Objective 12 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.338
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 5 4.500 0.450
Final Rating 4.278
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory
CLAIRE S. JUAREZ MA. LEAH S. UMADHAY D.R.Dev. LOURDES A. MONTEFRIO D.S. Ed.
Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen