Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Theoretical Aspect
INTRODUCTION
Human resource management (HRM) includes conducting job analyses, planning personnel
needs, recruiting the right people for the job, orienting and training, managing wages and
salaries, providing benefits and incentive, evaluating performance, resolving disputes, and
communicating with all employees at all levels. Example of core qualities of HR management is
extensive knowledge of the industry, leadership, and effective negotiation skills. Formerly
Human resource management is called personnel management.
Acquisition
This is the getting phase of HRM. It includes estimating both the future demand and supply for
human resources and integrating these resources into a total human resource strategy. In other
words, the objectives and future directions of the organization must be known before any reliable
forecasts of people needs can be made. The acquiring process includes recruiting, selection and
the socialization orientation of new employees. The employee acquisition covers the following
functions of HRM:
Recruitment: Recruitment is the process of attracting, evaluating, and hiring employees for an
organization.
Selection: Selection is the process of selection a qualified job candidate for a job who can
successfully do it and add value to the organization.
Orientation: Orientation tactics exist to provide new employees enough information to adjust,
resulting in satisfaction and effectiveness in their role.
Maintenance
This is the keeping function and involves providing benefits, services and working conditions
that are needed if individuals are to remain committed to the work place (Dessler, 2005, p. 39).
Motivation
Employee motivation refers to the offering of different factors and forces those cause employees
to be inspired to the attainment of goal of the organization. It covers the following functions of
HRM:
Employee Training and Development: A core function of HR management is development,
which entails training efforts designed to improve personnel, group, or organization
effectiveness.
Performance evaluation: Performance evaluation is the process of assessing an employee’s job
performance and productivity, usually for a specified period of time.
Career development and management: Career path management requires HRM to plan and then
actively manage employee skill in the pursuit of successful professional careers (Keith &
William, 2010, p. 45).
Reduced supervision
When workers have been formally trained they need not be supervised constantly. This reduces
the work load on the supervisor and allows him to concentrate on other activities in the factory.
Reduction in wastage
The amount of material wasted by a trained worker is negligible as compared to the amount of
material wasted by an untrained worker. Due to this the company is able to reduce its cost its
cost of production.
Less turnover of labor
One of the advantages of the training program is that it increases the confidence of employees
and provides them with better career opportunities. Due to this employee generally do not leave
the company. There by reducing labor turnover.
High rewards
Effective training programs result in improved performance. When performance appraisal is
done excellent performance of the employee is rewarded by giving him incentives and bonus.
Increased motivation
Employees who have been trained are generally more confident as compared to others. Since
their efforts will be rewarded in future they are very much interested in improving their
performance. Therefore we can say that their motivation levels are very high.
Group efforts
Training programs are not only technical programs but are also conducted in areas like conflict
management, group dynamic (formal and informal groups), behavioral skills, stress management
etc. this enables employees to put in group effort without facing problems that groups normally
face. In other words tracing teaches people to work in a group.
Promotion
People who attend training programs learn from them and improve themselves are generally
considered for promotion. Thus training increases chances of promotion.
METHODS OF TRAINING
On-the-job training methods
A comprehensive on-the-job training program may contain multiple methods. The training is
imparted on the job and the employee gets training under the same environment where he has to
work. This system is very cost effective and popular. The following methods of training fall this
category.
Coaching: This method involves teaching by a superior about the knowledge and skills of a job
to the junior or subordinate. This superior points out the mistakes committed by the trainee and
make suggestion where and whenever necessary.
Understudy: This method involves a superior provide training to his subordinate as his
understudy. The chosen trainee subordinate is most likely to be promoted to the higher post after
the retirement or promotion of his superior under whom he is receive training. The trainee is the
boss under making. It is a kind of mentoring to help the employee to learn the skills of superior
position.
Position rotation or job rotation: This method involves moment employees to different jobs to
gain knowledge and function various jobs within the organization. The incumbent thus realizes
the problem and working of the job and develop respect for the fellow employees.
Job instruction training: In this method a superior explain the knowledge, skills and method of
doing the job to the trainee employee. The supervisor provides the feedback. This is effective
method training for the operation staff in the industrial establishment.
Committee assignment: In this method committees consisting of group of employees are given a
problem and are invited to give solution. The employees solve the problem and submit the
solution. The objective of this method is to develop teamwork among the employees.
Special meetings of the staff: Special meetings of the staff of the department are held
periodically to discuss the problems faced by the employees at work and suggestions are invited
to improve performance of the job. These meetings are conducted by taking retreat from the
work for a short while. Here employees are supervisor provide feedback.
DEVELOPMENT
The concept of training employees to have a wider perspective on their position within the
workplace has been around for hundreds of years, but it is only relatively recently that the idea of
creating a simulated environment for trainees to test their abilities and skills has been developed.
The first commercially available training simulation was in 1956, and was called the top
management decision game, and was created by the American Management Association.
Since then, the market has expanded hugely, with thousands of simulations available based upon
hundreds of different industries. Initially very simple with just a few choices to make, some
simulations have become extremely complex with many different interlinking decisions. When
training simulations were first used, they involved paper forms that were filled in by the
participants and then compared by the organizer of the exercise. Nowadays, nearly all
simulations are computed based, and involve multi-stage algorithms that calculate performance
based the decisions entered. Most simulations are base around a real industry, and hence they use
real data to be as accurate as possible and provide a realistic experience. However, some remain
generic and do not model a particular industry, although these tend to be more useful for younger
players or those with absolutely no business knowledge. French (2010, p. 76)
IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Optimum Utilization of Human Resource:
Training and development helps in optimizing the utilization of human resource that further
helps the employee to achieve the organizational goals as well as their individual goals.
Productivity:
Training and development helps in increasing the productivity f the employees that helps the
organization further to achieve its long-term goal.
Team spirit:
Training and development helps in inculcating the sense of team work. Team sprite, and inter-
team collaborations. It helps in inculcating the zeal to learn within the employees.
Organization culture:
Training and development helps to develop and improve the organization health culture and
effectiveness. It helps in creating the learning culture within the organization.
Organization climate:
Training and development helps building the positive perception and feeling about the
organization. The employees get these feeling from leaders, subordinates, and peers. Training
and development is the framework for helping employees to develop their personal and
organization skills, knowledge, and abilities. The focus al off aspects of human resource
development is on developing the most superior workforce so that the organization and
individual employees can accomplish their work goals in service to customers.
Employees of labor should enable employees to pursue training and development in a direction
that they choose and are interested in, not just in company-assigned directions. Companies
should support learning, in general, and not just in support of knowledge needed for the
employees current or next anticipated job. It should be noted that the key factor is keeping the
employee interested, attending. For every employee to perform well especially supervisors and
managers there is need for constant training and development. The right employee training,
development and education provides big payoffs for the employer in increased productivity,
knowledge, loyalty and contribution to general growth of the firm. In most cases external
training for instance provide participants with the avenue to meet set of people in the same field
and network. The meeting will give them the chance to compare issues and find out what is
obtainable in each environment.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Training and development both plays significant role to develop and increase the
skill, knowledge and ability of present employee of the organization. People
sometimes merge the significance of training and development and thought both
are same. But in wide perspective there are huge difference between training and
development. Here I tried to find out some major difference between training and
development. They are following:
Basis of comparison Training Development
Meaning Training is a learning process Development is an educational
in which employees get an process in which the personnel
opportunity to develop skill, of the organization get the
competency and knowledge chance to learn the in depth
as per the job requirement. application of theoretical
knowledge for their overall
growth.
Term Short term Long term
Focus on Present Future
Concentrated Job Career
towards
Instructor Trainer Self
Objective Improve the work Prepare employees for future
performance of the challenges
employees
Number of Many Only one
individual
Aim Specific job related. Conceptual and general
knowledge.
Analysis
Understanding the external and internal business environment. Selecting and applying
appropriate business models and tools.
Synthesis
Drawing together the results of the analysis into a competitive strategy. Applying management
theory to choose a strategy that will provide competitive advantage and premium prices.
Implementation
Planning and putting the strategy into effect. Change management tools and techniques,
alternative organizational structures and selecting the most suitable. Measuring, monitoring, and
modifying plans. This program is aimed at senior managers, managing directors and owner
managers of growing businesses.
TRAINING EVALUATION
Providing a sound definition more than a lexicographic exercise; Ii can clarify and refine
concepts, generating a framework within which to develop a pragmatic approach to the subject.
Evaluation is no exception, and the apparent confusion in the minds of many as to the purposes
and functions of evaluation corresponds to the ignorance or misunderstanding of what is meant
by this and related terms such as research, validation, and assessment. A variety of definitions
can be found in the literature, many of them simulative, and the inconsistencies in the use of the
terminology has “Muddied the waters” of training evaluation a great deal, affecting the success
of evaluation efforts. Bramley & New by (1984) summarize the diversity of terminology used
over the past decade, and offer a most helpful comprehensive table showing the
interrelationships between various concepts of evaluation. Rackham (1974, 454) offer perhaps
the most amusing and least academic definition of evaluation, referring to it as a form of training
archaeology where one is obsessively digging up the past in a manner unrelated to the future!
In the literature reviewed, where a definition of evaluation is given, the majority of writers tend
to view it as the gathering of information in order to make value judgments about the program,
such as necessary changes or the possible cessation of the program. Williams (1976, 12) defines
evaluation as the assessment of value or worth. Harper & Bell (1982, 24) refer to the planned
collection, collation and analysis of information to enable judgments about value and worth.
However, as Williams (1976, 12) observes, value is a rather vague concept, and this has
contributed to the different interpretations of the term evaluation.
TRAINING EVALUATION PROCESS
Organizing a successful training program is complex. Most of the time the actual objectives of
training program are not achieved because of lack of knowledge about process and error
evaluation. Here I include a modern process for conducting training evaluation:
PURPOSE OF EVALUATION
As well as the lack of agreed-on definition of evaluation, there is an equally broad range of
opinions as to the purpose of evaluation. More than 20% of the writers neither describe nor
imply a purpose for the evaluation. Where purposes are outlined, they provide some telling
sights. For example, 15% see the purpose of evaluation as justifying the training departments
existence and providing evidence of cost benefit to the organization. While a mere 2% consider
assessing trainee reaction to be the purpose of evaluation, and 50% see the purpose as judging
the quality and worth of the program in order to effect improvements and or identify the benefits
of the training it should be remembered that studies already referred to provide evidence that
many trainers are not evaluation beyond the level of trainee reactions.