Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Chemical co-precipitation method was used for the preparation of Co-ferrite nano-particles. The particle
Received 29 April 2008 size was about 18 nm. A magnetic anisotropy of Co-ferrite could be increased by applying an external mag-
Received in revised form 24 June 2008 netic field during the pressing of the nano-particles before the final sintering. This anisotropy enhanced
Accepted 29 June 2008
the squareness and the coercivity of investigated samples.
Available online 19 August 2008
© 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PACS:
75.50.Gg
75.0.Ss
75.60.Ej
Keywords:
Magnetic properties of Co-ferrite
Nano-particles
Magnetic anisotropy
0925-8388/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.139
562 H.M. El-Sayed / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 474 (2009) 561–564
Fig. 1. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern and (b) SEM of Co-ferrite nano-particles.
field (Hext ) could be attributed to the orientation effects of the nano- 3.2. Magnetization measurements
particles with the applied magnetic field (Hext ). From Table 1, it is
also observed that the porosity has an inverse relation with the In fact, the enhancement of the degree of orientation of the Co-
applied field (Hext ) which may be attributed to the increase of the ferrite samples with the applied field (Hext ) in [1 1 1] direction is
grain size. expected to affect the magnetic properties of the investigated sam-
ples. Fig. 5 shows the magnetization curve in the perpendicular and
Fig. 5. Magnetization curve for the sample with Hext = 20 kA/m in parallel and per-
pendicular directions to the surface of the sample. Fig. 6. Magnetization curves for all samples.
Table 1
Grain size, porosity and the hysteresis parameters of Co-ferrite
Applied field (kA/m) Grain size (m) Porosity (%) Ms (emu/g) Mr (emu/g) Mr /Ms (%) Hc (Oe)
0.0 9 12 74 19 25 330
12 14 12 74 22 30 420
16 20 10 77 28 36 630
20 38 8 79 37 46 700
564 H.M. El-Sayed / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 474 (2009) 561–564
(Ms ), remanance (Mr ), ratio (Mr /Ms ), which represents the square-
ness, and the coercivity (Hc ) for the all samples are shown in
Table 1. It is obvious that the ratio (Mr /Ms ) increases with increas-
ing the applied field during the pressing. This means that there is
an enhancement of the squareness of the samples. On the other
hand, there is an increase of the coercivity with increasing Hext .
Since according to Brown’s relation [12]
2K
1
Hc ≥ (3)
o Ms
where K1 is the anisotropy constant. One can see that the coercivity
has a direct relation with the anisotropy constants K1 . Therefore, the
increase of Hc with the applied field, during the pressing of sam-
ples, proves the increase of the magnetic anisotropy. This means
that the application of a magnetic field during the pressing of Co-
ferrite nano-particles before sintering could enhance the magnetic
anisotropy without the need of substituting any other ions.
4. Conclusions
References
Fig. 7. Hysteresis loops of Co-ferrite samples at different Hext
[1] P.C. Rajath, R.S. Mannab, D. Banerjee, M.R. Varma, K.G. Suresh, A.K. Nigamc, J.
Alloys Compd. 453 (2008) 298.
parallel directions to the surface of the sample at Hext = 20 kA/m. It [2] R.K. Sharma, O. Suwalka, N. Lakshmi, K. Venugopalan, A. Banerjee, P.A. Joy, J.
is clear that the perpendicular direction is easy to be magnetized Alloys Compd. 419 (2006) 155.
than the parallel one. This means that there is magnetic anisotropy [3] M. Rangel, T. Ogasawara, M. Nobrega, J. Mater. Res. 9 (3) (2006).
[4] J. Wang, T. Deng, Y. Dai, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 3402.
in the sample. This is attributed to the degree of orientation of the [5] Z. Niu, Y. Wang, S. Li, J. Mater. Sci. 17 (2006) 41.
samples in [1 1 1] and [1 0 0] directions. The magnetization curves [6] T. Krishnaveni, B. Rajini Kanth, V. Seetha Rama Raju, S.R. Murthy, J. Alloys
of the four samples in perpendicular direction to the surface of the Compd. 414 (2006) 282.
[7] C. Cao, Nano Structures and Nano Materials, Imperial Collage Press, 2004, pp.
sample are shown in Fig. 6. It is obvious that the sample which is
331.
pressed under higher magnetic field is easier to be magnetized, i.e. [8] R. Arulmurugana, B. Jeyadevanb, G. Vaidyanathana, S. Sendhilnathan, J. Magn.
the anisotropy becomes higher. Magn. Mater. 288 (2005) 470.
[9] B. Pandya, H. Joshi, R. Kulkarni, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 5509.
[10] J.S. Yang, C.R. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 11877.
3.3. Hysteresis parameters [11] T. Tsuchiya, H. Yamashiro, T. Sei, T. Inamura, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 6454.
[12] J.M. Coey, Rare Earth Permanent Magnetism, John Wiley and Sons, New York,
The hysteresis loops of the four investigated samples are shown 1996, pp. 220.