Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Audit Report
SP-1036-12-12E
October 2012
Audit of Management of Call Centre Operations
Paper
ISBN: 978-1-100-21218-0
Cat. No.: HS28-205/2012E
PDF
ISBN: 978-1-100-21219-7
Cat. No.: HS28-205/2012E-PDF
Audit of Management of Call Centre Operations
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Human Resources and Skills Development Canada’s (HRSDC) network of 14
specialized call centres is the key point of contact for citizens/beneficiaries to
access their client-specific information under the Employment Insurance (EI),
Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAS) and Employer Contact
Centre programs. In fiscal year 2011–2012, these specialized call centres
answered 8.69 million calls from Canadians.
The call centre network is managed through the four regions and National
Headquarters (NHQ). The Call Centre Directorate (CCD), within the Processing
and Payment Services Branch (PPSB) in NHQ, is responsible for the overall
planning and scheduling strategy, and developing the call centre network budget
and forecasts. NHQ also oversees program delivery and provides guidance
relating to quality and harmonization. The delivery of programs and services
within each region is governed by the regional Executive Head, Service
Management (EHSM).
Audit Objective
The objective of this audit was to provide assurance that the management control
framework supporting the EI and CPP/OAS call centres is in place and applied
consistently across all call centre operations.
Audit Conclusion
Recommendation
1. To ensure that relevant and useful information is used in its National Quality
Assurance Program (NQAP), PPSB should:
a. Implement a call monitoring methodology that will reflect a reasonable
distribution of monitored calls over time and consider operational changes,
e.g. recent updates to procedures may call for increased monitoring.
b. Ensure timely and complete coaching sessions between Citizen Service
Officers (CSOs) and Team Leaders (TLs) are conducted and documented.
_________________________________________________
Vincent DaLuz, CA, CIA
Chief Audit Executive
Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 Context
HRSDC network of 14 specialized call centres is the key point of contact for
citizens/beneficiaries to access their client-specific information under the EI,
CPP/OAS and Employer Contact Centre programs and to address enquiries
regarding the status of their files. Call centres also process transactional requests
such as changes of address, direct deposit or marital status, renewals and/or
cancellation of benefits. In fiscal year 2011–2012, these specialized call centres
answered 8.69 million calls from Canadians. Of this, approximately 800 EI call
centre agents answered over 5.3 million calls and approximately 400 CPP/OAS
call centre agents answered over 3.0 million calls.
The call centre network consists of four regions along with NHQ. The CCD in
NHQ is responsible for the overall planning and scheduling strategy and
developing the call centre network budget and call volume forecasts. NHQ also
oversees program delivery, provides guidance relating to quality and
harmonization, and leads the implementation of any enhancements to the
network. The delivery of programs and services within each region is governed
by the regional EHSM.
The objective of this audit was to provide assurance that the management control
framework supporting the EI and CPP/OAS call centres is in place and applied
consistently across all call centre operations.
1.3 Scope
The scope of this audit included the CCD, PPSB at NHQ and the 14 EI and
CPP/OAS specialized call centres located across Canada (five EI sites, three
CPP/OAS sites, six sites housing both EI and CPP/OAS). The following call
centres were visited in February and March 2012:
Edmonton EI & CPP/OAS call centres
Montreal EI & CPP/OAS call centres
Bathurst EI & CPP/OAS call centres
Toronto EI & Scarborough CPP/OAS call centres
1.4 Methodology
A number of methodologies were employed during the conduct of this audit, such
as:
Interviews/discussions with management and staff from PPSB at NHQ and
from specialized call centres;
On-site observation at regional call centres;
Comprehensive review and analysis of relevant documentation; and
File review and analysis of quality assurance reports and related action plans.
Overall, roles and responsibilities are clear and accountabilities are well defined.
A performance management strategy, comprised of a suite of indicators related
to the network’s speed of service, is in place. Frequent updates on these
indicators and performance against them are provided. However, it is not clear
how these indicators and related performance data align with the network priority
of first contact resolution.
Analysis
Overall, interviews with call centre management and staff indicated that roles and
responsibilities were clear and understood. However, they also identified
uncertainty about the role of the call centre Business Expertise Consultant (BEC).
The audit team noted that roles and responsibilities for the BEC varied amongst
regions. In some instances, the BEC was seen as a technical expert who
provided advice to the Business Expertise Advisor (BEA), whereas in others, the
BEC was seen as a generalist that was primarily concerned with business
enhancements, process improvements and trends analysis. Management in the
regions reported that this inconsistency has been a cause of confusion or
uncertainty about the BEC’s role in call centres. There may be a need to review
existing roles of the BEC in order to improve consistency and clarity of the
position.
On the other hand, the TL’s role is consistent across the network. TLs’ range of
responsibilities include taking CSOs attendance, monitoring indicators, providing
feedback to CSOs, conducting coaching sessions based on BEAs’ quality
assurance reports and handling call escalations. The audit team noted that TLs
are not required to have program specific knowledge and this poses certain
challenges. For example, while conducting feedback sessions with CSOs based
The CCD provides the regions with a daily report on different performance
measures. Data included in these reports are forecasted call volume compared to
number of answered calls, service level (percentage), average speed of answer,
abandoned calls (percentage), average handle time, vacation and other leave
(percentage). In discussions with management, the audit team was informed that
first contact resolution of transactions is in fact currently measured, but these
results are not published. Regional call centres are also provided reports on
performance against expected call handling capacity, i.e. what is deemed to be
achievable with their current level of funding. Management informed the audit
team that these reports facilitate discussions with the CCD about improvements
to a call centre’s performance.
The current service level target is to have 80% of callers speak with a live agent
within 180 seconds. The audit team reviewed monthly performance trends dating
from April 2009 to March 2012 and noted that the network has not met this
service target in the three fiscal years reviewed. The fiscal year average for CPP,
OAS and EI call centres can be seen in the chart below.
Analysis
Risk Management
Risks are being identified at the branch level as part of the Regional and National
Integrated Business Planning Processes. However, Regional Integrated
Business Plans do not necessarily identify risks at the call centre level. Although,
call centres have not documented their own risk registers, the audit team noted a
variety of measures that CCD has implemented to mitigate operational risks.
Minor opportunities for improvement have already been brought to
management’s attention during debrief meetings. The audit team also reviewed
Business Continuity Plans at the regional and CCD levels and found they include
detailed action plans in the event of a number of scenarios.
Workload Management
The CCD applies a Resource Determination Model to determine the appropriate
mix of resources to meet forecasted demand and uses the draft accountability
framework to establish what is achievable within the network’s funding envelope.
The CCD, in consultation with the regions, has developed additional strategies to
manage the network’s workload, i.e. having a mix of part-time and full-time
resources to build latent call handling capacity into the network. While call
centres are not meeting their current service levels, workload management
strategies are in place to best manage national demand and workforce
availability within the current network’s funding envelope.
There is a training regime in place for newly hired CSOs as well as seasonal
refresher training. To support them in their role, agents access a web-based
reference tool which is also used to communicate updates or changes to
procedures. Our interviews with agents indicated that they would prefer more in-
class training sessions to validate their understanding of updated or new
procedures.
Call centres have a NQAP in place to monitor calls and generate reports for
coaching sessions. The audit team identified instances where the NQAP
guidelines were not consistently applied or followed. Taking into account the
interview and audit results as well as the way the NQAP is currently carried out, it
is not clear to what extent the quality assurance program provides relevant and
useful information to achieve consistency and improve client service.
Analysis
Training
Training is a shared responsibility between NHQ and the regions. The CCD is
responsible for coordinating the development of national program training while
the regions are responsible for delivering program and legislative training.
The New Hire Call Centre Curriculum (NHCCC) is a training program that
teaches agents technical and soft skills to deliver quality service to citizens. Staff
indicated that the NHCCC training packages adequately prepare agents for their
duties at the call centres. In addition to the initial training, “refresher” sessions are
provided, for example annual T4 and Guaranteed Income Supplement training is
provided to OAS/CPP agents. Staff expressed that they would benefit from
additional training sessions such as “current issues” and “soft skills”.
To support them in their day-to-day functions, call center agents access the
Common Reference Tool (CRT), a web-based reference tool that includes
policies, procedures and other information related to EI and CPP/OAS in a
structured manner. The CCD is responsible for maintaining and updating the
CRT.
In addition to the CRT, call centres agents have access to a regional Business
Expertise support line manned by BEAs when they require assistance. Most
regions have taken the initiative of independently developing tracking tools to
collect information about the use of their support line with the goal of analyzing
the information for trends and training needs. At the time of this audit, this
regionally collected information was not available to the CCD for analysis. We
were informed that NHQ is currently working with the regions to implement a
national support line for agents.
Quality Assurance
In 2008, the CCD implemented the NQAP with the objective of achieving
consistency and improving client service. The program is effectively a live call
monitoring regime. This program was revised in 2010 following observations and
comments gathered during the evaluation phase.
The NQAP requires each agent to have five calls monitored per quarter. Calls are
evaluated by BEAs using a scorecard of 26 technical and soft skills criteria. The
criteria cover all technical aspects of the call such as the greetings and
authentication, fact finding, resolving needs, promotion of services and the
closing. In addition, soft skills aspects such as an appropriate tone, vocabulary,
rate of speech, and demonstration of confidence are evaluated. A monitoring
report containing general observations on the agent’s strengths and areas for
improvement is written by a BEA. Within one week of monitoring, the report is to
be discussed between the agent and his or her TL in a coaching session.
The audit team reviewed a total of 156 monitoring reports from across the four
call centres visited. The results are as follows:
For 37 reports (23.7%), the coaching session with the TL took place later than
one week. The range in which sessions were late was two weeks to two
months following the monitoring of calls.
In 22 instances (14.1%), there was no record of the coaching session being
conducted by the TL.
Management indicated that the NQAP has been designed to serve as a coaching
tool. However, staff at call centres confirmed that the feedback received from
monitoring reports is not always useful from their perspective since the small
number of calls monitored during a quarter (versus the number of calls
answered) may not provide a representative view of their performance.
Additionally, these monitored calls are known to occur on the same day, at times
consecutively. The audit team is of the opinion that this methodology may not
provide a realistic depiction of the agent’s performance.
The NQAP guidelines provide for a standard of quality and consistency. Taking
into account the interview and audit results as well as the way the NQAP is
currently carried out, it is not clear to what extent the quality assurance program
provides relevant and useful information to achieve consistency and improve
client service.
Recommendation
1. To ensure that relevant and useful information is used in its NQAP, PPSB
should:
a. Implement a call monitoring methodology that will reflect a reasonable
distribution of monitored calls over time and consider operational changes,
e.g. recent updates to procedures may call for increased monitoring.
b. Ensure timely and complete coaching sessions between CSOs and TLs
are conducted and documented.
3.0 CONCLUSION
Overall, a management control framework supporting the EI and CPP/OAS call
centres is in place and applied consistently across all call centre operations.
However, the audit found areas for improvement related to quality assurance.
The following table outlines the audit criteria and examples of key evidence and/or
observations noted which were analyzed and against which conclusions were drawn. In
cases where significant improvements (1) and/or moderate issues (2) were observed,
these were reported in the audit report.
APPENDIX C: Glossary