Page 1 of 95

The Law. The People.. Their Sovereignty... Their Rights.... Their

Land..... Their GOVERNMENT and ITS PROPERTY......

“My People are destroyed for lack of Knowledge: because Thou hast
refused Knowledge, I will also Refuse Thee that Thou shalt be no Priest to
Me: and seeing Thou hast forgotten the Law of Thy God, I will also forget
Thy Children.” Geneva 1599. A corrupt system finds its security in the
ignorance of the People; Publius
A
Treatise on, and Repository for the Principals of the Natural Law
taken
from The Constitution and Laws of The United States of America
and ,
Their Specific Application to the People as Citizens of the Several
States of This American Union
With References to the Common and Natural Law of America and
Its European Founders
by
Publius
------------------------------------
In the Common Law Republic of California; Established (1849)

Created according to Prerogative Right, The American Common

Law, and Sovereign Duty for the Education of the Posterity of the
Founding Fathers (Federalists), Nunc Pro Tunc from the Year One
Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy Six.-----------------------------

Prelude
This Writing, is in a Dictionary format, and is in the best “Kings
English”, and is based on the Principles and Wording taken from
“Blackstone’s Commentaries” Ch 7 “The Kings Prerogatives” (1753); The
“Federalists Papers” (1788) (Library of Congress Catalog Card Number
61-10757); as well as Many Never overturned Supreme Court rulings,
 Page 2 of 95

such as Chisholm vs. Georgia 2 Dall 419 (1793); Lansing vs. Smith 4
Wendell 9,20 (1829); Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1856);
Hennessy vs. Richardson 189 U.S. 25 (1902); also Noah Webster’s
Dictionary of the English Language (1828); Bouvier’s Law Dictionaries’
(1840/56/1914) and The Many other Sources of Our Liberties, to name a
Few.
Intent
This is not an attempt at ethnic cleansing; and must not be viewed as
racially motivated, but is a path for all People to see the truth within
themselves.

That being said, The Purpose and Intent of this Dictionary is to

perpetuate the Law of God on Earth, in The United States of America. And
by this Principal, to expose and correct the Many ERRORS, deviations
from the Truth, that have been committed by those so-called educated
INDIVIDUALS, and their MISS USE of “words”, their “confounded
definitions”, there fraudulent applications, and the erroneous
“CAPITALIZATION” of most of the technical Words that are now
compiled in the many Volumes of LEGAL and Lawful writings that fill
the Law Libraries of each and every County in these Federal States. The
words that I shall identify, have now become a Source of deception and
fraudulent guide for the average “person” leading to the total
IGNORANCE of the People, European descendants of these United States
in America and an unlimited source of $numbers for a Constitutionally
Prohibited FOREIGN Central “BANC”.

Rules of Engagement and Their Application

This Writing is not laid out in Alphabetical order, but instead, is in

consequence of the evolution of Our Federal System in Time by
chronological Date from at least Magna Charta, 1215 (Act of defiance by
Europeans in Europe) through the Revolution (1776) /revolt of the
descendants of Europeans in America, up to its impending demise, (2016).
 Page 3 of 95

I must first set the Rules that must be Adhered to in order that the
Reader might catch a Clear and True Understanding of the Proper use,
Meaning and Application of each Word as they are Confined to Our
Federal System in The United States of America..and their applicability
and Intent when applied to [T]he People as defined herein:

Rule Number 1: Noah Webster Authored and compiled the Best

known available English Language Dictionary defining the “words” of the
English Language in a very broad general since from at least Magna
Charta (1215), to (1828). Although not created in the best “Kings
English”, It is still in print in the United States of America, and is
preceded only by the Federalists Papers and the Supreme Court decisions
on each technical Subject. Note: that whether by mistake, ignorance or
criminal intent, none of the Case Law or reprints are done in the Best
Kings English. For the best Example of the “Kings English”, See the
Original Script Constitution of the United States of America (1788);
or, see Public Law 91-589; 92nd Congress 2nd Session Senate Document
No 92-82, US Printing Office Stock Number 5271-00308 Dated (1972) for
a “Literal Print” Copy of the Original Script in type;

Rule Number 2: At the Revolution (1776) Each one of The People,

who was a subject of the Crown in Europe, became, by Natural Law, “A
Citizen of the State” in America, in consequence of His or Her “Demain
Domicile”;

Rule Number 3: At the Revolution (1776) The 13 feudal colonies in

America, held by the Crown of Europe, became, by force of Law,
“Allodial” Independent Sovereign States”;

Rule Number 4: At the Revolution (1776) The total Sovereignty

impregnated in the person of the Crown of Europe over the 13 feudal
colonies in America, was transferred and grafted, by force of natural Law,
 Page 4 of 95

into the “Citizens of the State” and Their Posterity, Who, in that moment
of Revolt, became a Law unto Themselves, unique as to all the other
Sovereign Nations’ in this World;

Rule Number 5: At the Revolution (1776) The Private Prerogatives

of the Crown’s of Europe, and all the Political Power exercised by them
over the 13 feudal colonies and their subjects, evolved, by natural Law,
into the “Citizen of the State”;

Rule Number 6: At the Revolution (1776) all the Crown Land of the
Original 13 Colonies in America, became Independent Sovereign States,
and the exclusive Allodial Property of the new Sovereign People, now
equal to all other Sovereign Nations of the World. And all future Land,
Claimed or Purchased under authority of these People, after qualifying
under Article IV with a “Republican form of Government, and becoming a
State on an equal footing with the Original 13 States of the American
Union, were, from that moment, and Forever, subject to the “Private
Allodial/Domain” Claims, when made by one of the People, Descendants
of “Europeans and a “Citizen of That State as one of the Several
States of the American Union”;

Rule Number 7: The Federalists Papers are the Final Word on the
Interpretation, Intent, and Application of the Original Constitution; and
when a Question arises about the Strict Meaning of any Word in It, or the
Law applicable to it, reference must be made to Rule Number 1. Publius

Chapter 1................The Law

The Law
 Page 5 of 95

This writing is based on the Principals of “[T]he” American

Common Law and Truth

July 4th 1776, When the Founding Fathers revolted and Shook off the
FEARS of self responsibility, and the chains of subjugation on the
continent of America, They planted the seed of Individual Sovereign
Liberty Here. Once that Seed was Planted, the Fruit of that Seed Produced
a Federal Union of Individual Sovereigns. That Federal Union was a
“People” descended from the European blood line. Governed by, what
they called “The Common Law of England” that was birthed at the signing
of Magna Charta (1215). That Seed took 561 years to grow into a
Sovereignty Of, By, and For the “White European People”. This
“Common Law” is a Creation of God, that operates Equally upon All of
God’s Creatures. It certainly follows that the common law of retribution,
Cause and Effect applies to everyone. The following quotes are just a few
examples; (1)You Treat your fellow Man/and Woman as you want them to
treat You; (2)You Do unto others as You want them to do unto You; (3)
What you do to the least of mine, You do to Me (God the Creator); (4)
You reap what you sew; An eye for an eye; (5) A pound of flesh for a
pound of flesh; But, vengeance is in the hand of God. These are just a few
of the Common Laws that the Founding Fathers used in the Creation of
this Nation.

If you are blessed with the gift of being a wise council and godlike
example for People, and you use this gift for self enrichment, personal
power to inflict your will over other people, you are violating one or more
of the Common Laws, and will reap the consequences of God’s American
Common Law.
This Common Law, as distinguished from “statutory, equitable, or
civil law”, is the foundation upon which the State of California was
Founded, and is the Law in all the Courts of this State See California
Statute 95, April 13, 1850; REPORT ON CIVIL AND COMMON LAW;
Establishing, in place of The CIVIL LAW, the “American Common Law”
 Page 6 of 95

@ page 604; and confirmed in CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 22.2 (1986); AND,
Blacks 5th Law Dictionary (1979) p. 251; and Emma Rojo v. Kliger 265 Cal. Rptr. 130, 52
Cal. 3rd 65 (1990);Fenn v. Holm 62 U.S. (21 How.) 481(1858)

It’s the nature of “Words” to cause the human mind to identify

strict pictures. It has been said, that one picture is worth a thousand words.
Different strict words, in their acceptation, are generally used to create
different strict pictures. Therefore, when two different words are used in
their strict meaning to identify two strictly different pictures, the mind
automatically sees two strictly different pictures. This principal is sound
and maintains the Picture of Truth. As was in the minds of the Founding
Fathers, when they used the word “Citizen”, it was associated with only
[O]ne, of the 13 States, not All of the 13 States. They were “Citizens of a
State, Not a “citizen of the UNITED STATES”!

But what if during a long chain of writings, someone vested with

authority were to replace the Proper Noun word “Citizen”, as it was
Capitalized and written in the Original Text of the Script Constitution of
the United States of America, with the common noun/word “citizen” as
used throughout the rest of the world? The Original Proper Noun
“Citizen ” is the first Principal of Our American Common Law that
describes [T]hat specific Member of the specific Class of Uncommon
European descended People known individually as a “Citizen” of a State
of the collective United States of America, As written in Article IV §2,
Original Constitution of the United States of America (1788); “ The
Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and
Immunities as Citizens in the several States.”
Thus was the case by Thomas Jefferson in the 1st Naturalization Law
(1790). Not only is the word ‘citizen’ not properly capitalized, but also
makes reference to the United States, a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
 Page 7 of 95

[DC] not yet created (1795). If you place the word “White” next to one of
the qualifications for citizenship, there is now a very distinct difference
between this “Citizen” and all the other “citizens” before the Revolution of
1776. They are what the Supreme Court has generally called the
“Sovereign People”, Synonymous with “We The People”, and “Citizen of
the State”. This application of the word ‘Citizen” properly capitalized is
now an exclusive picture of a White Citizen of European decent Domiciled
in one of the Several Federal States in America; and is now a “Proper
Noun” and properly Capitalized when and wherever the government needs
to identify this exclusive Sovereign Status. Refer to the Case of United
Mine Workers 330 U.S. 258 footnote 23/24 (1947). No other word like person,
individual, resident, taxpayer, can be used in any law to have any lawful
application to the Private Person or Property of a “White Citizen of the State”

But, through many erroneous acts, Legislative Executive and

Judicial, this Proper Noun “Citizen” has regressed back in time when it
described only a “subject of the Crown”. Thus begins the creation and
infusion of a “NEGATIVE POWER SYSTEM”. Such a system, like a
“DEMOCRACY”, is now used by the TRATORUS, TREASONEOUS
elected trustees to empower themselves through the influx of A
MAJORITY of aliens and their want for a free lunch. Thus the
extermination of the White Citizen of the State replaced by alien denizens
of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Colombia aka ‘THE
UNITED STATES’; and in this new age of enlightened ignorance is found
a growing element called by the GOVERNMENT as, the “Sovereign
People”. This new class of People is hard on the minds of the present
system. The System is trying to discover a cure for this new found ailment
that now threatens its DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST MONARCHY. But
it will be discovered, like the Revolution (1776) that tyranny at any level
or degree will at some point be exterminated, and the People will reappear
as before and start anew as the Posterity of We the People, in this
Republican form of Government.
 Page 8 of 95

These false tools, as used by the confounded teachings of the present

democratic government controlled education system, teaches the use of
common words that have uncommon meanings in Our Federal System.
This creates a false picture. As previously explained, when the Word
“Citizen” is used in the Constitution with a Capitol “C”, it is describing a
“White European Sovereign Citizen of one of the Several States in His
Sovereign Person, with Unalienable Rights; on the other hand when the
word “citizen” is lower case, it describes a common person, although
appearing to have an elevated status, but is now nothing more than a
subject of the District of Columbia, not a State, having only CIVIL
RIGHTS and “Banc CHATTEL” This is for the strict benefit of the CIVIL
CODE system, not the Sovereign People. The Posterity, and their senses,
have not yet properly developed according to Gods Law, but have instead,
become jaded and destructive to themselves and their neighbors. The
present code system has hidden the access to the strict pictures of the Law,
blinding the Posterity from discerning the difference between Right and
Wrong, or Unalienable Secured Rights as opposed to CIVIL
GUARANTEED RIGHTS

The word ‘Law’, hereafter defined, emanates from ‘God’ and can be
seen through mans actions, either through His Heart, or His MIND.
When His Heart is right, His actions are seen as ‘God Like’,
and the effects are of ‘Love’, or simply ‘Positive’.
When the ‘Law of God’ is defused through His MIND by ‘ego,
‘lust’, ‘anger’, greed’, attachment, or ‘vanity’, His Heart becomes grieved,
and the effects are simply NEGATIVE.
It is the Sovereign Nature and Power of God to instruct Man
through the operation of the Law of cause and effect. This Law is the
Grand Design and the Rule from God showing exactly how Man and
Woman are to listen, not through the senses, but from inside Their Person,
and to Therein discover the Domicile in him of the Law of God, and learn
to Act from the Word of God, or, to gain enlightenment, or suffer as the
case may be, the consequences for not hearing.
 Page 9 of 95

The word ‘LEGAL’, is a creation of Man and is not

synonymous or equal to the word “Lawful”. It is simply a jaded or
confounded picture of the Law. It is used to convince Man to follow a
CODE, or MANS rules that use words taught by the system that are of
common use but that define acts or things that subject the People by their
ignorance, to a regulatable CODE, which when not complied with, causes
fines, fees, and criminal/COMMIRCIAL punishment. The code
regulations are used to identify strict acts of a commercial nature but that
also identify the Prerogative Unalienable Rights of the Posterity. These
catch “words” are in every code, STATE AND FEDERAL. [See list in
box of Chapter 6, Their GOVERNMENT]
When Mans RULE as written, does not acknowledge Gods
Law, or fails to identify the Path to Gods Law, it is a WRONG, or simply
an incomplete LEGAL RULE.
The rules of MAN, with the exception of The Constitution
(1788), have always been identified as, a ‘CODE’; but, there is a Lawful
Statute upon the Books of the California Republic that was later codified
as THE CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE CODE, that not only
identifies the LEGAL licensable activity and the license FEE associated
therewith, but, this Statute also shows and distinguishes that LEGAL
licensable COMMERCIAL activity from the Constitutionally Secured
Lawfuly Exempted Prerogative Unalienable Right of Liberty secured to
the Posterity under Gods Law. AND THE REVOLT(1776) The
following is an actual quote taken from that Statute, but
unfortunately, like most other statutes, fails to cite its specific
Constitutional Authority:

Ch. 412] FORTY-SIXTH SESSION

833
 Page 10 of 95

“An act to impose a license fee for the transportation of persons or

property for hire or compensation upon public streets, roads and highways
in the State of California by motor vehicles; to provide for certain
exemptions; to provide for the enforcement of the provisions hereof
and for the disposition of the amounts collected on account of such
licenses; to make an appropriation for the purpose of this act; and to repeal
all acts or parts of acts in conflict herewith.

[Approved by the Governor May 23, 1925.]

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. The words and phrases used in this act shall for
the purpose of this act, unless the same be contrary to or inconsistent with
the context, be construed as follows:
...........
(b) The word “operator” shall include all persons, firms,
associations and corporations who operate motor vehicles upon any
public highway in this state and thereby engage in the transportation
of persons or property for hire or compensation, but shall not include
any person, firm, association or corporation who solely transports by
motor vehicle persons to and from or to and from attendance upon
any public school or who solely transports his or its own property, or
employees, or both, and who transports no persons or property for
hire or compensation, but all persons operating freight carrying
vehicles so exempted shall be required to obtain from the state board
of equalization and to display exempt emblems in the manner
hereinafter provided.” Underline and Red added for emphasis.

This Act further states that the exempt plate shall be obtained from
the California Board of Equalization without fee or charge.............!!
 Page 11 of 95

To see the intent of the authors of The phrase “MOTOR VEHICLE”,

and “USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES”, they are STRICTLY
defined in THE UNITED STATES CRIMINAL CODE TITLE 18
CHAPTER 2, AIRCRAFT AND MOTOR VEHICLES; § 31; AS
DEFINITIONS; and states as follows:

“(a) Definitions. - In this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(1) Aircraft. - .

(6) Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every

description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn
by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the
highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and
property, or property or cargo.

(10) Used for commercial purposes. - The term "used for

commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property
for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or
directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other
undertaking intended for profit.......”

This is a COMMERCIAL CODE applicable to anything or anyone

that chooses to violate the “American Common Law”, in place of the
REGULATABLE, TAXABLE, LICENSABLE, FINABLE, FEE LADEN
MANMADE CODES AND REGULATIONS for effecting OR contracting
with the Public At Large.

Law = God = The People/Posterity = Unalienable Rights =

Sovereignty of the White Citizen of the State = The American Common
Law = The Constitution = Trust = Government Trustees = Statutes Under
the Law to protect and defend the Sovereignty, their Prerogative Rights,
and the Private Property of the People, and their Posterity;
 Page 12 of 95

Following an act of the legislature, once that Authority from

the Constitution of cited, the Statute under the Law is created and a code
may follow. This “CODE” is then LEGAL by way of the execution of the
= POLICE POWERS which mandates= LICENSE = PERMISSION to
engage the Public for PROFIT OR GAIN = COMMERCE effecting the
Public = CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS = CONTRACT with the
Public = Violations of the Public Trust and or the COMMERCIAL and
CRIMINAL CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS = COMMERCIAL,
CRIMINAL which are all LEGAL COMMERCIAL CRIMES. This
system derives its security from the IGNORANCE of the Posterity, and
each of Them. Publius

Man, out of ignorance and fear, has chosen to be trapped under a

LEGAL SYSTEM distinguished from the American Common Law,
created for the strict protection of his Unalienable Rights. This protection
is found in the enactment and enforcement by the “POLICE POWERS”,
under authority of the commercial codes rules and regulations that apply
specifically to the specific activities of an ‘ARTIFICIAL’ nature, that is
‘COMMERCIAL’; where a person engages the Public in a licensable
taxable profitable act, that the Founding Fathers placed under the strict
guidance AND control of those most learned of the People by and through
the Constitutionally created Trustees of the American Common Law
GOVERNMENT, the Posterity is left to discover the key to the exit of this
CODE system.

Back to “The Law”:

“Law”; According to Noah Webster 1828 American Dictionary of

the English Language (hereafter referenced as NW28), there are at least 30
different notations on “Law”, none of which specifically identify the
“Law” emanating from the creation of the “United States of America” by
its “European decended People”. This “Law” could be, and should be the
“Law of God” on Earth. The closest NW28 comes to this “Law” is called,
 Page 13 of 95

in number “8. Moral law, a law which prescribes to men their religious
and social duties, in other words, their duties to God and each other.
...delivered to Moses on mount Sinai. Ex. xx.”

At the Revolution of (1776) the European People of the Union of

States in American, became Sovereign under God. And by this Act,
became a “Law” unto Themselves. This Law is Common to the People on
Earth, Not just Europeans, but to all Classes and Faiths. And therefore
falls under the definition of the Common Law of Nature. The Law of
Nature is The Righteous Law which God, the Sovereign of the Universe,
has prescribed to All Men and Women, not by any formal promulgation,
but by the internal Dictate of Consequence alone. It is discovered by each
of Us from its affects upon Ourselves, and that of other Humans and
nature, resulting from Our Individual and or collective acts culminating
from such causes, which are the plague and nature of Man and Woman on
Earth. The Righteous Law is not amendable or subject to any complaint or
dictate of Man. It treats of the divine Rights of the People as well as that of
the kings. It works both ways equally so that neither can escape the effect
of a trespass upon the Other’s Rights. The negative Cause creates a
negative consequence. To have to write the Law upon the Books and use
this as a guide to keep society Right with the Moral standards of Life is a
futile attempt to halt the disorder in a society. As the Human race enters
upon its decline in civilized standards there is, and was, a transfer of the
Righteous Law from Man to Constitutions, ENACTED STATUTES and
CIVIL&CRIMINAL CODES, in other words, from Moral Standards
deeply embedded in the inner Consciousness of The People, to LAWS and
RULES written in BOOKS. When the time came that the Law of
Righteousness was no longer in the Hearts of the People, but in their
enacted BOOKS, then the decline of the union of Righteous Men began.
Consequently it comprehends all the Duties and Payments which Man, by
His ignorance, owes either to God, to Himself, or to His Neighbors; such
as Reverence to God, Temperance, Honor to Our Parents, Benevolence to
All, a strict Adherence to Our Engagements, Gratitude, Punctuality,
 Page 14 of 95

Patience, and a strict Discipline to the Act of “Unconditional Love”.

Publius

The “Constitution of The United States of America” (1788), is the

Rule of Law of The White European People, and was an attempt to
Create a Higher Physical Environment far removed from the European
monarchies of chaos and subjugation, for the express purpose to help
Awaken this “Moral Righteous Law” in the Hearts of Its People, and an
example to the world.

The “ Several States of America”; Is The perpetual Blood line of a

Group of ”Individual, Federal, Sovereign, Citizens of European decent”,
United to form the Repository for the Key to the Door of the Laws of
Enlightenment on this Physical World. Although founded out of Revolt to
Secure the Principals of Liberty, This is The One Nation under God on
Earth where a common Man, or Woman, if He/She knows the Rules of
Law, can Exercise that God given Unalienable Right to consciously take
part in the creation of His/Her Own Destiny. This is a prelude to a higher
State of Consciousness, as well as partaking of the privilege of
Sovereignty Secured by God to the People in This Nation. Publius Refer
to Articles I through X of Amendment Constitution of the United States of
America 1791;

“The United States of America”, (In the Best Kings English) From
the Revolution of 1776, up to and including the Ratification of the
Constitution on June 21, 1788, and just prior to the Establishment of The
Seat of NATIONAL and Federal Jurisdiction on July 16, 1790, known as
the “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, a “MUNICIPAL CORPORATION”,
the Phrase “United States”, had but One and only One, 1, I, meaning,
that being, it described “The 13 Independent Sovereign States, United
under God, by the mutual collective Prerogative act of the European Male
Sovereign State Militia/Citizens. The People, in Their Person, as
Individual Sovereigns, United for Their Mutual Benefit and the Ultimate
 Page 15 of 95

Protection and Security extending over All the Federal States for
Themselves and Their “Posterity”. These People were All Of European
Decent. Publius; see the US Supreme Courts confirmation in Dred Scott
vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1858).

On June 21, 1788, following a great deal of debate and the

publishing of the “Federalist Papers”, the Ninth State of New Hampshire
caused the “Divinely Inspired” “Constitution of the United States of
America”, The People’s Law, to become the Federal Law of The Land in
every Republic State of the Union, including a not yet established
municipal corporation called D.C. .............at least Two major unforeseen
“flaws” , NOT ERRORS, remain in that document;
The 1st Flaw, unforeseen by the Founders, has allowed the
Constitution, to be altered in such a way as to open the gate of freedom to
a Constitutionally prohibited ENEMY, the “BANC”, well known to the
Founding Fathers, AND, to nullify the value of the Peoples Labour. The
Lock that secured this gate was Article I, Section 10, Clause 1. “No State
shall..... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of
Debts;” The hole, left unplugged , was A YET TO BE FORMED
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION called “THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA”. Although DC maintained a gold and silver standard, IT
nullified its example in 1871, after a “CIVIL WAR”, by way of FORTY-
FIRST CONGRESS SESS. III CH 62. SEC. 18, as there was no
constitutional prohibition against BANCING, or the circulation of BANC
PAPER in D.C.. The BANC faction, through Hamilton, soon implanted
its foreign jurisdiction within this Nation. See Mc Culloch vs. Maryland 17
U.S. 316 (1819); And by the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT of 1913, and the
ignorance of Ron Paul in a senate hearing with Bernanke, this FRAUD has
extended its infectious tentacles, through fraudulent contracts, void
licensing, and foreign commercial powers over the The Posterity, and
throughout the several Sovereign States of this American Union.
..... This foreign enemy BANC, by way of its morally
DEGENERATED BUSINESS PRACTICES of MORTGAGING THE
 Page 16 of 95

People, HJR 192, and circulating ITS non-redeemable PAPER as “LEGAL

TENDER”, has assumed, through the greed and ignorance of “The
Posterity”, total control over the Posterity, Their Private Property, Their
Gold and Silver Coin, Their Labour, and the total alienation of Their
Sovereignty and Their Federal and State Constitutions; BUT ITS
FIXABLE

The 2nd and probably most damaging flaw , not ERROR, was the
failure of Madison, and the following Supreme Courts to emphatically,
and in strict words, Explain and Show in Plain English, the True Intent and
True meaning and True Definition of the word “Amendment” as it was
written by the Founding Fathers in Article V of the Constitution;

First I must quote Madison from the Federalist Papers in

which He States:

8. ``To provide for Amendments to be ratified by three fourths

of the States under two exceptions only. ''That useful alterations will be
suggested by experience, could not but be foreseen. It was requisite,
therefore, that a mode for introducing them should be provided. The mode
preferred by the convention seems to be stamped with every mark of
propriety. It guards equally against that extreme facility, which would
render the Constitution too mutable; and that extreme difficulty, which
might perpetuate its discovered faults. It, moreover, equally enables the
general and the State governments to originate the amendment of errors, as
they may be pointed out by the experience on one side, or on the other.”
Madison No. 43, Federalist Papers page 278; Emphasis added;

So what error has been pointed out????

“Amend”, “Amendment” NW28. v.t. To correct; to rectify by

expunging a mistake; as to amend a law. v.i. It differs from improve, in
 Page 17 of 95

this, that to amend implies something previously wrong, to improve does

not....3. In Law, the correction of an error in a writ or process.”

If the word “Amendments” was all that Madison intended, he would

not have added the word “Error” in the Federalists Papers;
“
“Error” n. A wandering or deviation from the truth. NW28; A “Writ of
Error” is a writ of Right; Bouviers’1914,vol I p. 210; This Writ was displaced in our
Law by SIXTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS SESS. II CH.229 SEC.237 & 238 (1925).
Also see 359 US 437,448-459;

Was the Constitution, or any part of it a Lie??? I think

Absolutely Not!!! Publius

The Revolution of 1776, and many of The Supreme Courts rulings

deciding “Errors”, such as in Chisholm v. Georgia 2 Dall 419 @ p.
471(1793); emphatically explains the True Principals of The People and
their relationship to Their Sovereignty. This Case was so powerful that it
caused those factions, democrats, republicans and solists, who were
already busy with deceptive work in each State, to bring about the so-
called 11th amendment. This so-called amendment, in fact of Law,
violated the intent of the Federalist Founders, and took away a Prerogative
Due Process Right of all the “Citizens in the several States”, and Their
Posterity. This Right, was to sue another State in the one and only Court
created by the hand of the People in Article III of the Constitution, which
is the Supreme Court, and is Sovereign by its nature and its delegated
Right of “Error”, “Writ of Error” when the Constitution, The Law of the
People, is in ‘Jeopardy’;
This Court, by the Intent and Nature of its Creator, The People,
Owes its highest Duty and allegiance to the People. This “Duty” is to
discover and expose All ERRONEOUS acts committed by the Legislative,
Executive and Judicial branches that, by their intent, are in direct conflict
with the Constitution, and inconsistent with the Principal Security of the
 Page 18 of 95

Sovereignty of the People who Created it; And, during or after the
discovery of such Errors, this Court, by its Sovereign Authority, is
emphatically and without question Immune and Exempt from any Reprisal
in refusing to exercise their power to enforce those discovered Errors.
These discovered Errors of Law are void in their inception, and this Court
is not bound by, or held to any rule or code of any subsequent or following
act of the legislature or executive or Judicial branch under the discovered
“Error”; Mugler v. Kansas (1887) 123 U.S. 623 @ 661; But, the Supreme
Court is, and should be, by the Law of its allegiance and creation,
extremely Prejudice to the “Law of Its creation, and the Will and Intent of
the People who created it,” for the express purpose of protecting and
defending the Unalienable Rights of “The People” and “Their Posterity”
against All acts of Their REPRESENTATIVES, and as stated by the
Chisholm Court, while dealing with the Rights of Contract between the
Highest Sovereign Statuses of this Nation. And by the ruling in the
Chisholm case, the Due Process Right of a Sovereign Citizen of one State
to bring an Original Action of Assumpsit in this Supreme Court against a
Union of Fellow Sovereigns incorporated as another State. See the
Original Article III U.S. Constitution. 1788 Section 2.

And like the so-called 11th amendment, If you wish to discover, or

presume to find the “Alleged Errors” cited by their originators,
authenticating the Lawful nature of the following so-called
AMENDMENTS, 11 through whatever, happy hunting, because there
were, nor are there any to be found!!! And each and every so-called
amendment that has now been crammed down the throats of the Posterity
after the original Bill of Rights (1791) is a void amendment for failing to
show the exact Error, deviation from the truth In the Original Constitution
and Treason upon the Posterity of Our Sovereignty.

There was never an ‘Error’ discovered, shown, or stated in

Article III by the originating proponents or creators of the 11th so-called
amendment; Nor can there be any found today. It was the default ruling
 Page 19 of 95

of the Chisholm Court and their blistering opinion against the State of
Georgia that caused the void enactment of the 11th so-called amendment.
It was the overpowering reality of the Sovereignty and Power of the
People, addressed by the Chisholm Court, enforcing the absolute
“Sovereign Power of the White People” as an Individual Private Citizen of
a State to win an action in Equity in the Supreme Court over another
State that brought about the creation of the void 11th so-called amendment.
Although not blatantly showing and describing this Fact of
Law, The Chisholm Court also showed that Congress is not without
“Error”. See Chisholm at p. 420, lines 22&23 where congress erroneously
inserts the words “but not exclusive”, which words are not found in the
wording of Article III.
Again, Error...........“A wandering or deviation from the Truth.”
NW28

The following questions and Answers are based on the Principles of

Law as applied to the White European Sovereigns of this Nation:

The question[S] that never came before the Court in any case,
especially; Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dall 378, 1798, was;

Question 1. Did the Supreme Court, in Chisholm 2Dal419 (1793),

“Error” in its Ruling against Georgia?
Answer 1: The Principal of this case is simply stated by the
following Supreme Court Ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1965) 384 U.S.
436 @ 491; “Where Rights Secured by the Constitution are involved, there
can no rulemaking of legislation that would abrogate them.”: enter the
void 11th amendment Error;

Question 2. Was it the Intent of the Founders to vest the highest

Sovereignty of this Federal/Union/Nation in A GOVERNMENT over the
“People”??
 Page 20 of 95

Answer 2: The Revolution and complete Separation of “We The

People” from all the other powers on this Earth Secured the Sovereignty of
the People, which should be More than enough evidence to Show any one
of average intelligence the force of Natural Law and the true Intent of the
Founding Fathers Enforcing It. The Federalist Papers, followed by the
Chisholm case would be a good starting point for your enlightenment:
“The People surrender Nothing”
Question 3. Is a STATE of this Union higher in its Sovereignty than
the “Posterity of the People” of the Founding Fathers who created it???

Answer 3: By the Revolution (1776), “We the People” established

the Sovereignty of the People, the States, and the Union of States; and by
the Federalists own words; “The People surrender Nothing”; Federalists 84
p.513; The only power enforceable over “We The People” was and is
“God”:

Question 4. Could there be found a “Lawful” code, rule, order, treaty

or judicial decision, enacted by the legislative, executive or judicial branch
of Our government, either, state or federal, purporting to vested it, or any
of them, with the power to overturn and or nullify a Constitutional
Principal, Established by the Revolution, that Secured the Unalienable
Rights of the Life, the Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to “We the
White People and Their Posterity????”

Answer to Question 4: If such a power, by code, rule, statute, treaty

or executive order or otherwise, purporting to be such a Law could be
found, those creating it, those enforcing it, and those executing it upon the
Unalienable Rights of “We The White People or any of Us”, or “Our
Posterity”, would be guilty of TREASON!!!!!

The term “Treason” appears only once in the Constitution in Article

III Section 3; wherein they state; “Treason against the United States, shall
 Page 21 of 95

consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies,

giving them Aid and Comfort. ....”. The prelude to this Article is found in
Federalists No. 69, Hamilton states: “All conspiracies and plots against the government,
which have not been matured into actual treason, may be screened from punishment of
every kind, by the interposition of the prerogative of pardoning.”

So what conspiracy or plot has matured into actual Treason??? And

who are the conspirators adhering to Our Enemies????

As the Plot to convert the Peoples Gold into non redeemable LEGAL
TENDER BANC paper, and the People to remain as CROWN subjects,
was the initial cause of the Revolution (1776), all of those who remained
in the States after the revolt, or followed the criminal nature of BANCING
that again began in Maryland by Hamilton in the 1790's, unless they
survived the ‘FEDERAL RESERVE ACT’ (1913), they ARE now DEAD;
but all those who have endeavored to perpetuate this monstrous immoral
criminal act of BANCING against the People and Their Posterity, are in
fact of Law co-conspirators to the ongoing crime of ‘BACKING’ and the
INTERNATIONAL ACT OF ‘GENOCIDE’ against the White Citizens in
the Several States of this American Union and Their Posterity.
The following quote is taken from Bouvier’s’ Law Dictionary
(1856);
“ADHERING. Cleaving to, or joining; as, adhering to the enemies of
the United States.
2. The Constitution of the United States, art. 3, s 3, defines
treason against the United States, to consist only in levying war against
them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
3. The fact that a citizen is cruising in an enemy's ship, with a
design to capture or destroy American ships, would be an adhering to
the enemies of the United States. 4 State Tr. 328 ; Salk. 634; 2 Gilb. Ev.
By Lofft, 798.
4. If war be actually levied, that is, a body of men be actually
assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable enterprise,
 Page 22 of 95

all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from
the scene of action, and who are leagued in the general conspiracy are to
be considered as traitors. 4 Cranch. 126.

So, has such an act, or acts of “War” or “Treason” occurred within

the jurisdiction of the Executive authority of any one of the States, or the
United States of America???

Powers Granted or Prohibited: Article X in Addition to and

Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America (1791);
“The Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to
the People.”

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the “Law of the Flag” the
next time you see a State of Federal Flag with Gold fringe, be informed
that the law of the Gold Fringe is “ADMIRALTY”, not the American
Common Law; Admiralty equals MARTIAL LAW; No standing Army;

1st Act of War/Treason: hence most of the Common Law Courts fly
this Gold Fringe Admiralty Flag, which is an act of war against the
Sovereignty of the People.

For Congress To coin gold and silver Money and regulate its Value;
2nd Act of War/Treason: in this case is the printing of the non-
redeemable counterfeit notes by a privately controlled alien group (Federal
Reserve) and confiscate/steal all the gold and silver from the People;

Congress shall; Establish a uniform rule of Naturalization throughout

the United States,

3rd Act of War/Treason: Congress was never vested with the power
to naturalize, or to alter the Status of the Elector of the most numerous
 Page 23 of 95

branch of the State Legislature; or any member/Trustee of our State and/or

Federal Republic;

The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a

Republican Form of Government.

4th Act of War/Treason: To convert our Federal Republic to a

“Democracy”, is, in itself the highest crime that could be committed
against the People and their Sovereignty!!!!

The principal stated in 2. above would follow here; That a citizen or

group of citizens, or persons who are engaged in an immoral
constitutionally Prohibited Act such as BANCING, who engage in the act
of printing and “exchanging that fraudulently worded foreign paper” for
the Peoples Lawful Coin” or Their public and Private Property, are in fact
cruising in an enemy's vessel called “the BANC”, with a specific design to
ultimately destroy Our American Common Law monetary system and Our
“Republican Form of Government”, while , at the same time exterminating
the Common Law Citizen of the State, while confiscating Their Soil, all of
which are acts adhering to the enemies of the United States of America,
and the Sovereignty of The People!!!!!

For clarification, the term “Common Law” is quoted in the

‘CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE §22.2 WHEREIN IT STATES, “That the
Common Law of England, so long as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent
with the Constitution of the United State, or the Constitution or Laws of
this State, is the rule of decision in all the Courts of this State.” So,
England is in Europe and by Noah Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the
English Language, is the Land of the White Face. This means that the
White Men and Women who are Citizens of this State are the true
Posterity and Sovereignty of this Nation and are the source of the
American Common Law as descended from the “English Common Law”
from Magna Charta 1215.
 Page 24 of 95

The ENEMY HERE is the “BANC”, commonly known as and called

“THE FEDERAL RESERVE”, of which every officer, employee, elected
or appointed officials, both city and county, both state and federal, and
most people throughout the States and territories are all on its
payroll...................................

The subject status of which I speak, although originally a creature of

Africa, was, by way of the erroneously enacted 13th, 14th, and 15th
amendments to the US Constitution. was used as a vehicle to alter the
Lawful status of the White People, and increase the growing presence of
the Prohibited BANKS throughout the several States. Although having its
original foundation in the 2nd Naturalization Act, It was accelerated under
the guise of the ‘CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS’ 1866. This subject status is
commonly known as “a STATUTORY 14th amendment citizen of the
UNITED STATES”.

Madison, in Federalist No. 43 made the following observation:

“May it not happen, in fine, that the minority of citizens may become
a majority of persons, by the accession of alien residents, of a casual
concourse of adventurers, or of those whom the constitution of the State
has not admitted to the rights of suffrage?”… See Van Valkenberg v.
Brown 43 Cal. 43,47 (1872) citing Dred Scott v. Sanford;

The personal body of these foreign alien residents were already

among Us. The Constitution identifies them in Article I, Section 2.
Paragraph 3, as “......three fifths of all other Persons.” and by the words of
the Supreme Court in Scott v. Sanford 60 US 393,408 (1856) :

“And, accordingly, a Negro of the African race was regarded by

them as an article of property, and held, and bought and sold as such, in
every one of the thirteen colonies which united in the Declaration of
 Page 25 of 95

Independence, and afterwards formed the Constitution of the United

States. “

This subject STATUS of ‘person’, by legislative act of CONGRESS,

became the vehicle to enslave all The People by the phrase “citizens OF
THE UNITED STATES” who are, by the wording in the 14th amendment
are subject to ‘ITS JURISDICTION’; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.

Remember, Any act of congress not CITING a specific delegation of

authority from the Constitution must be construed to have relied on the
only two provisions giving it unlimited delegated power over a specific
kind of soil for the express purpose of protecting the White People and
Their Constitution. These two provisions are found exclusively in Article
I, Sec. 8 Cl. 17; and Article IV, Sec. 3, Cl. 2. Of which neither was ever
cited as its authority to create the Act of April 9, 1866, entitled “CIVIL
RIGHTS BILL”; This Act which was, by its enforcement within the
States, another void law in violation and repugnant to the American
Common Law and the “Intent of the Founding Federalist Fathers (For
further definition of “citizen of THE UNITED STATES”, see chapter II,
“The People”)

A Conspiracy or plot is defined as :” A combination of men for a

evil purpose; an agreement between two or more persons, to commit some
crime in consort; particularly, a combination to commit treason, or excite
sedition of insurrection against the government of a state; a plot; as a
conspiracy against the life of a king; a conspiracy against the
government.” NW28

It might be well to examine the use and history of the word ‘CIVIL’
as it was used in all the writings of Law, from the Magna Charta to the
present day Constitution to discover the hundreds of times this word was
used, but only for the specific purpose to distinguish matters of a criminal
 Page 26 of 95

nature from that of Law , Equity, Admiralty and Maritime. A “CIVIL

CODE” combining Law and Equity found no place in the States, or the
United States until the years following the CIVIL WAR. But, as stated,
Law and Equity were still isolated principles accept in a few states like
Texas, where the Supreme Court admonishes it for combining Law and
equity UNDER a “CIVIL CODE”;

This is what the framers of the Seventh amendment had in mind:

“By the common law, they meant what the Constitution denominated
in the 3d article LAW, not merely suits which the common law recognized
among its old and settled proceedings, but suits in which legal rights were
to be ascertained and determined, in contradistinction to those
where equitable rights alone were recognized and equitable remedies
administered”. Fenn v. Holme 21 How. 41.
“In Texas, the common law has been adopted, but the forms and
rules of pleading in common law cases have not, and although the forms of
proceedings and practice in the state courts have been adopted in the
district court of the United States, yet such adoption must not be
understood as confounding the principles of law and equity, nor as
authorizing legal and equitable claims to be blended together in one suit”.
Bennett v. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 11 How. 669 (1850).

And further,

“It is settled that the "law" of this state includes the common law as
well as the Constitution and the codes. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1895, 1899;
Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co. (1954) 125 Cal. App. 2d 222, 229
[270 P.2d 604].) [3] " 'The code establishes the law of this state respecting
the subjects to which it relates'; but this ... does not mean that there is no
law with respect to such subjects except that embodied in the code ....
[W]here the code is silent, the common law governs." Rojo v. kliger 265 Cal.
Rptr. 130, 52 Cal. 3rd 65 (1990);
 Page 27 of 95

This is verification of the Principal that was laid down by the

Revolution that Birthed the true nature of the American Common Law;
which is the act of doing whatever does not infringe upon the rights of the
Public At Large, or Your neighbor. In order to exercise the American
Common Law, Do not engage the Public At large by posting a sign of
Your Calling, or advertising this Calling in any public way, weather by
paper, posting, post, sign, adverting, notice, phone directory, business
card, internet, or running your private Common Law calling through the
BANC. To do otherwise, is to open your Private Doors to the PUBLIC AT
LARGE, and all ITS commercial codes, rules, regulations, orders, licenses,
taxes and whatever else the GOVERNMENT WANTS or can think of
MAKING YOU DO!!!

The Constitution is based on immutable Principles, Constitutions,

errors of monarchies, religious edicts, bibles, and untold numbers of other
writings by so-called morally advanced wise men throughout history. Its
Founders have compiled the best of the best to insure and secure that the
American Common Law Rights under God, and there Moral intent, would
be Maintained by and for the White People and the Posterity of We the
White People.

Which brings Us to the next question of Law??

What Specific Article, Section and or Clause of the Constitution of

the United States of America (1788), was cited by Congress authorizing it
to enact the Federal Reserve Act in 1913???

As previously cited,The Law, Article X of Amendment states: “The

Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
Prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or the
People.”
 Page 28 of 95

So what Act of “Law” authorized BANCING to become part of this

States monitory system?? Not only can none be found, but The
Constitution of the United States of America (1788), in Article I, Section
10, Clause 1. States that:

“No State……[including but not limited to California]

shall…….coin Money, emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and
silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;.....”; Actual, Correct
Capitalization;
And it is further Stated in the Act of Statehood for the California
State Republic Constitution (1849) Article IV Sections 34, & 35:

“Sec. 34. The legislature shall have no power to pass any act
granting any charter for banking purposes; but associations may be
formed, under general laws, for the deposit of gold and silver, but no such
association shall make, issue, or put into circulation, any bill, check,
ticket, certificate, promissory note, or other paper, or the paper of any
bank, to circulate as money.

Sec. 35. The legislature of this state shall prohibit, by law, any
person or persons, association, company or corporation from
exercising the privileges of banking, or creating paper to circulate as
money.”

When the MONEY CHANGERS caused Our Common Law

California Constitution to be VOIDED by the 1879 fraudulent
replacement, leaving out the Prohibition on BANKING, the words “NO
BANKING: was displaced by carefully fraudulently worded insertions
like; “Sec. 5. The legislature shall have no power to pass any act to pass
any charter for banking purposes, but ... may be formed under general
laws.................for the purpose of regulating the business of banking. No
corporation, association, or individual shall issue of put in circulation as
 Page 29 of 95

money, anything but the lawful money of the United States.” California
Constitution (1897) Article XIII [Amendment adopted by fraudulent US
subject voters November 8, (1910). Enter the ‘FEDERAL RESERVE
ACT’ (1913) and “LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” commonly known as a “FEDERAL
RESERVE NOTE”. The Elector status was eliminated by the US congress
with the so-called 15th amendment!!

So just what is “BANKING”????? The principal aim of

“BANKING” is, and always has been, to turn non redeemable fiat paper
currency into Gold and Silver. It’s much easier than turning lead into Gold
because all you need is a “THIEF”, a bunch of gold and silver enriched
ignorant People, some ink, paper, and a printing press; and last but not
least, “A BANK/C”; historically known as “A MONEY CHANGER”
“John 2:14.

“LEGAL”, Or “Lawful”???

When does “LEGAL TENDER” paper, as found on a private

“FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE”, become “Lawful Money” as identified in
the Constitution as gold and silver Coin??? It doesn’t, because the
FEDERAL RESERVE is PRIVATE, and is not found anywhere in the
Constitution over any one of the several States or their People. But, if that
paper was issued by act of congress as applied to the States, it would say
in the first line of the paper, “United States Note”, and would then follow
as “Redeemable” and Only, When that paper is redeemable in the real,
constitutionally struck, under the power of Article I, § 8 Cl. 5, by the U.S.
Mint, as in certified gold and silver Coin, and not otherwise.

Script: 1st, Find a system where the People have a gold and silver
monitory standard???!!!! The United States of America and a bunch of
ignorant People who don’t understand the American Common Law;
 Page 30 of 95

2nd Wait until most of the founding Fathers are dead, and convince
one of the remaining to help setup a bank in the DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA, where there is no prohibitions against “BANKING”; or
better yet in the State next door, like Maryland. That way the building is
the property of DC. Art 1/Sec8/ cl.17. What goes on there is no business of
the State, or any of Them.

3rd. Let the Printing press role.............and don’t forget to use the
Word Federal on the NOTE so all the ignorant People will think it’s a
Government issue. Time goes by and more ignorant “People become use
to the idea of paper gold and silver... one day, in 1913, the Federal
Reserve is born, and its banks start printing “Gold Certificates” numbered
from 100 to 100,000 US Dollar denominations.

4th. All that is needed now, is to trade them, or sell them to the
ignorant People for Their Gold at face value, you know like a 1troy oz
gold double Eagle for a 20 dollar frn. No problem. A little bit of
propaganda goes a long way, and its not long before most of the gold is in
the hands of, you guessed it, “THE BANCERS”. Still no problem, paper
gold running like water. All is well, except the BANKERS forgot to turn
of the printing press. Well, what did they do with the extra double, triple
amount of GOLD NOTES?????? I know, lets give, loan, cell, whatever,
them to some relatives across the pond!!!

5th. Now the fun begins. Those relatives turn right around and
exchange those extra notes for all the Gold. Still no problem until one of
the ignorant People decides to turn in all his paper gold to discover all his
real gold is gone. Is this Lawful??? No, but its profitable. Oops. Bank run.
Now you can see a really lot of “DEPRESSED”, ignorant People. some of
which actually jumped out of their own buildings. Real Depression [1929]
What a mess.
 Page 31 of 95

So, is the “FEDERAL RESERVE’ a ‘Moral PERSON’??? Do its

codes, rules, and paper conform to a ‘Moral Standard’??? If the BANC
maintained a full redemption for all the notes printed and in circulation, it
might be legal in some other country but is not Lawful as any other
Common Law Calling in Our Republican form of Government. But it
doesn’t, which is why it’s Prohibited by Law in this State, and even though
it has managed to infiltrate our monetary system, it still only operates
under the COMMERCIAL CODE that requires a ‘LICENSE’ for it to
exist. That Code only applies to DC and Its Territories not a State.

Enter the Law of “LICENSE”; (Lat. licere, to permit). In Real

Property Law. A permission. A right, given by some competent authority
to do an act, which without such authority would be illegal, or a tort or
trespass.....When the power [OF LICENSE] is exercised by municipal
corporations, [such as a STATE] a license is the requirement, by the
municipality, of the payment of a certain sum by a person for the privilege
of pursuing his profession or calling,....[taxi driver]......”; Bouvier’s’ 1914
@ p.1976; but only when said calling is WITH THE PUBLIC AT
LARGE. A Secured Private Right or Calling is Lawfully exempt from
any act of the STATE or FEDERAL/NATIONAL GOVERNMENT;

In Hale v. Henkel (1906) 201 U.S. 43 @ 74, the court emphasized

the rights of the Citizen of the State; to wit:

"The Individual may stand upon His Constitutional Rights as a

Citizen. He is entitled to carry on His Private business in His own Way.
His Power to Contract is Unlimited. He owes no Duty to the State or to
His neighbors to divulge His Business, or to open His doors to an
investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate Him. He owes no such
Duty to the State, beyond the protection of His Life and Property. His
rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the
organization of the state, and can only be taken from Him by Due Process
of Law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among His Rights are a
 Page 32 of 95

refusal to incriminate Himself, and the Immunity of Himself and His

Property from arrest or seizure except under a Warrant of the Law. He
owes nothing to the public so long as He does not trespass upon their
Rights.” (Emphasis added)Capitalization corrected!

They have converted the Unalienable Right to Liberty by the People

to travel upon their Public Right of Way and to transport his Private
Property or Private Persons thereon, into a licensable, taxable, insurable,
criminally punishable “COMMERCIAL PRIVILEGE OF OPERATING A
‘MOTOR VEHICLE, SUBJECT TO A MOTOR VEHICLE CODE
DESIGNED for the specific purpose TO REGULATE the
COMMERCIAL ACT of transporting persons and or property for hire,
PROFIT OR GAIN with the general public. See
En re: Stork; 1925 exemption; 18 USC §31 supra
___________________________________________________

Chapter 2
We The People

Words and Phrases following the Revolution, and strictly Applicable

to the People of the United States of America from Magna Charta (1215)
following the CIVIL WAR, and just preceding the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT,
June 16, 1866.

“The Best Kings English”; the Best example of the use of the Kings
English can be found in the Original Script version of the Original
Constitution of the United States of America, (1788) and or its “Literal
Print” previously referenced in Rule 1.

“People”; [Proper Noun, First Letter Capitalized] From the

Revolution of 1776, and throughout the Sovereign States, the word
“People”, as used in the Preamble and throughout the Constitution of and
 Page 33 of 95

for the United States of America (1788), and the Federalist Papers, is
synonymous with the phrase “Citizen of the State”, who, in their collective
Capacity, formed the Political Sovereignty of the United States of
America; and as an Individual Private Citizen, enjoy His/Her Private,
Prerogatives and Sovereignty; Chisholm vs. Georgia 2 Dall 419 (1793)
citing the word “People” 81 times; also see Martin vs. Hunter 14 U.S. 304
(1816); and, Lansing vs. Smith 4 Wendell 9,20 (1829); Dred Scott vs.
Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1856). The word “People” appears no less than 620
times in the Federalists Papers; 39 times in the Constitution of California
1849; and 3 times in the original Constitution of the United States of
America (1788). These People and Their Posterity, not Their government,
have the Exclusive Prerogative Right and Sovereign Power to determine the
Qualifications of Their Peers; See authorities from Article 9 of Confederation;
Steiner v. Darby & c.. Attached in the body of tabbed exhibits;

“American” Proper Noun; In the United States of America, A

native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals or copper colored
race found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of
Europeans born in America. Noah (1828); the change is directly associated
to the new Sovereign over America commonly called, “Europeans”;

“Europe” Proper Noun; [Bochart supposes this word to be

composed of white face, the land of White People, as distinguished from
the Ethiopians, black-faced people, or tawny inhabitants of Asia and
Africa.] Noah (1828); The word “Europe” and “European”, meaning
“White”, was used no less than 54 times in the Federalists Papers; the
Word White only once in the Articles of Confederation; the word White
appears Three times in the 1849 California Constitution. Prior to the Civil
Rights Acts, and pre banking, the word “White” can be found in all the
State Constitutions, all the naturalization laws, all the Elector
qualifications, all the State and Federal election requirements, and in more
case law than can be easily counted here.
 Page 34 of 95

“State” In the United States of America, (Found 50 times in the

original US Constitution) a Union of the European People as Federalists,
Princes, Freeholders, Domiciled on Their Demesne Manor (Crown Land)
as State Citizens, recognizing and enforcing Unalienable Rights and
disciplined in the principal of doing justice to Others. Publius; also see
Chisholm v. Georgia referenced in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1914) vol 2
p. 3120;

“Citizen”; according to the many authorities and their writings, this

word is of ancient origin. It has been used throughout mans history to
describe a group of single minded individuals who have banned together in
a particular geography, being a village, town, city, or larger, and to therein
establish a protective shield against intruders. This generally accepted
word would also be the prefix to that specific geography like, “citizen of
Rome”, &ccccccccccccccc...... But in all the authorities citing this word
has never in its entire existence been directly associated with, or used in
connection with the word “Sovereign”, until, the Revolution ending on
July 4, of 1776. The American People of European descent, by their own
Power, acquired the Sovereignty over the American Nation and its States.
At that point in time, each of Them became a “Citizen of the State” by
Their own Hand. And ever since have been plagued by unscrupulous
spiritually dead criminally minded people to destroy our Constitution and
our People!!!
This phrase “Citizen of the State”, is the foundation upon which this
Nation is Secure. It represents the specific, Highest Title of the Sovereign
in this Nation. This phrase, “Citizen of the State”, is the fountain from
which the Sovereign “Posterity” flows. Without this phrase, “Citizen of
the State”, there is no “Sovereignty”; Without this phrase “Citizen of the
State” there is No “People, no “Federal State”, No “Unalienable Rights”,
and most certainly no “Land of the Free”, or “Home of the Brave”; just a
bunch of “denizens”, “subjects”, Banc “chattel”, and 14th so-called
amendment “citizens of the UNITED STATES” screaming for their
government created, granted privileged “CIVIL RIGHTS”.
 Page 35 of 95

In order to fix, the application, definition, and true meaning of the

phrase “citizen of the UNITED STATES”, pay close attention to the
following paragraph:

“It will be observed, that under this Confederation, each State had
the right to decide for itself, and in its own tribunals, whom it would
acknowledge as a free inhabitant of another State. The term free
inhabitant, in the generality of its terms, would certainly include one of the
African race who had been manumitted. But no example, we think, can be
found of his admission to all the privileges of citizenship in any State of
the Union after these Articles were formed, and while they continued in
force. And, notwithstanding the generality of the words 'free inhabitants,' it
is very clear that, according to their accepted meaning in that day, they did
not include the African race, whether free or not: for the fifth section of
the ninth article [Articles of Confederation] provides that Congress should
have the power 'to agree upon the number of land forces to be raised, and
to make requisitions from each State for its quota in proportion to the
number of white inhabitants in such State, which requisition should be
binding.” Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393,@ p. 418 (1856). In order
to see how the African Race was treated by men of Wisdom in the United
States of America, look at the founding Constitution, and Article 9, of the
Sovereign “Republic of Liberia” (January 5, 1839). Publius;

This phrase “Citizen of the State” is directly opposed to the phrase

“citizen of the United States; It is a principal or Our Republican form of
government that the Phrase “Citizen of the State” should be well
understood by the very People who hold the Sovereignty of this Nation
and Each State. There are many citations on this phrase, but, it would be
well to ponder a point in our history where the phrase “Citizen of the
State” was expressly distinguished from the phrase “citizen of the United
States”, by Thomas Jefferson in the first two naturalization Acts:
 Page 36 of 95

In accordance with the Limited Power vested by the People in the

United States of America in Congress Assembled, by and through Article I
Section 8, Powers Granted to Congress: Clause 4 states; “To establish an uniform
Rule of Naturalization,.....throughout the United States.” Not in the United
States;
Which it did by the following wording:

In the United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule

of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).
“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a
free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the
jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted
to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of
record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term
of one year at least,........”

If you recite the Constitution from that specific Article, that vested
congress with power to create a rule, it wasn’t, nor has Congress ever been
vested with the power to naturalize; in fact the Tenth Article of
Amendment, by words so simple, the People prohibits congress from
doing any act or exercising any power not explicitly and expressly
delegated to it by the Constitution as ratified in 1791.

But, following the establishment of the MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, [hereafter
MCDC] on March 3, 1791 [FIRST CONGRESS. SESS II CH 28];
Congress amended the 1st NATURALIZATION LAW by enacting the 2nd
NATURALIZATION LAW; In which Thomas Jefferson states:

United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform rule of

Naturalization; and to repeal the act heretofore passed on that subject”
(January 29, 1795).
 Page 37 of 95

For carrying into complete effect the power given by the

constitution, to establish an uniform rule of naturalization throughout the
United States, as apposed to In the United States [DC MC] [and “Only in
a State Court having Common Law Jurisdiction”]
“SEC.1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any alien,
being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the
United States, [correct capitalization/ lower case “c”] or any of them, [any
one of the States] on the following conditions, and not otherwise: --
First. He shall have declared, on oath or affirmation, before the
supreme, superior, district, or circuit court of some one of the states, or of
the territories northwest or south of the river Ohio, or a circuit or district
court of the United States, three years, at least, before his admission, that it
was bona fide, his intention to become a citizen of the United
States,......................“ ????? WHAT UNITED STATES COULD NATURALIZE??????

The Power Delegated to Congress by The People, as Citizens of a

State to naturalize, extended only to, AND throughout the States, and,
only to any authorized “aliens”, having the specific qualification, such as
their “Race”; “their “Allegiance”; their Intent of “Domicile”; the specific
Court having American Common Law jurisdiction to take their “oath of
Allegiance in English”; and the minimum resident time for qualifying.
This is an American Common Law Principal and Un/Inalienable to the
People and Their Posterity. See exhibits of authority, attached under
tabbed heading [Rights of The People]

CONGRESS, in voicing its power to naturalize in one of its

Admiralty/Maritime Courts, just violated Article X of Amendment by
delegating and assuming to itself, as an Artificial MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, the Prohibited authority and Unauthorized Power to
NATURALIZE. And by this prohibited act, Congress also created an
artificial citizen and subject of and under the general jurisdiction of the
municipal corporation called the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; present day
 Page 38 of 95

this MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [MCDC] IS More commonly

known, AND , extensively expressed as “THE UNITED STATES”. When
congress, by way of the alien private bancing cartel began to test the
Sovereignty and Un/Inalienable Rights of the People, it started by re-
defining the term ‘UNITED STATES’ in most of its CODES like; “When
used in this TITLE,... the term “UNITED STATE” included all places.....
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States...” which shall include
“Guan”; “American Samoa”; Puerto Rico”; “the DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA”; “the Virgin Islands”; and even a pile of guano. See 18
U.S.C. Chap. 1, §§ 5 through 31; &, 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a) (9) & (10), to
name a few; also see US Supreme Court decision Hooven v. Evatt 324
U.S.652,671/672 (1944); where it states that “The term “United States”
may be used in any one of several senses.”......@ p.671; They even use the
specific word “State” to identify DCMC, which could not, even, if they
wished to do so, become one of the independent Federal States of this
Federal Union under Our Federal Trust Constitution;

When is a Federal/National court vested with American

Common Law Jurisdiction; This term, Federal Common Law has been
extensively explained and defined in great detail by the Supreme Courts,
both State and Federal, and only applies to the Supreme Court of the
United States of America, and the Circuit Court of the United States of
America..under Article III; And, Where the Lawful Title and or
Constitutionally Secured Rights are squarely before a Court, in order for it
to proceed it must have Common Law, or At Law jurisdiction. No person
can vest a court with full jurisdiction where either Personam, Subject
Matter, or Geography is lacking; and, The Supreme Court has jurisdiction
in Law where a State is a Party, and the Circuit Court has jurisdiction in
Law when Citizens of different States are parties; but neither is vested
with the Common Law Power to Naturalize an “Alien” to the position of a
“Citizen of the State” simply because these Article III Federal Courts are
 Page 39 of 95

not creatures of any one of the States. See Glidden v. Zdanok 370 US 530
(1962).

The truth of this matter is simply that upon the migration of such
individuals qualified to take up the sovereignty with state citizenship, after
establishing a “Domicile” in anyone of the U.S. territories not MCDC,
they must first create a Republican form of Constitution with Common
Law Meets and Bounds [Latitude and Longitude] for that yet to be
establish State. And upon its qualification in accordance with Article IV
Sec. 4, as being a “Republican Form of Government”, and their allegiance
to the “Citizens in the several States” and Their Constitution, all the
People so qualified by the provisions of the 1st Naturalization Act,
including any pre-qualified Citizen of any one of the already established
States of the American Union became, at that moment, “Citizens of the
new State” so established with full Sovereignty, Prerogatives, and
Unalienable Rights.

Next we come to a word that the Founders shunned because of its

relationship to that dreaded monarch that the Revolution was fought for
permanent separation. But whether they, the Founding Fathers, like it or
not, the Posterity are in fact of Law and Principal, “Princes” by the strict
meaning and construction of this League of Federal States United as a
Union under God.

A “League”, An alliance or confederacy between princes or states for

their mutual aid and defense; or, politically correct would be cited as, “The United
Princes of Their American States”;

“Prince” In the United States of America, is, Synonymous with

“The Son of God”; “The People” (60 US 393,419); “Their Posterity”-
“Descendants; children, children’s children, &c. indefinitely; the race that
proceeds from a progenitor. (NW28); A “Citizen of one of the Several
States of the American Union”; Dred Scott vs. Sanford 60 U.S. 393, 419
 Page 40 of 95

(1856); A “Freeholder” in His “Demain Manor”; An absolute estate in

perpetuity, and the largest possible estate a Man can have, being in fact,
Allodial in its Nature; and as equal to the Crown Land, called the
“Demesne Manor. NW28; A “Juryman” must be a “Freeholder” NW28; an
“Elector“ qualified by the Common Law of these United States of
America; a “Militia Man” also qualified by the Common Law of these
United States of America, and Citizen of the State, Domiciled in the
County; and any other individual who might have allegiance to that
particular State; and last but not least, all the Constitutionally qualified
State and Federal Legislative, Executive and Judicial Trustees Elected by
the constitutionally qualified Elector Citizens of a State, under the
Secured Established Principles of the Founding Fathers and God; “Where
Rights Secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule
making or legislation which would abrogate Them.” See Miranda vs.
Arizona 384 U.S. 436,491 (1966); and People v. De La Guerra 40 Cal
311,341-344 (1870); This Prohibition also includes any so-called
Amendment to the Constitution, 11 on.

Next comes the word “Federal” that was and is the defining
Principal used to Establish the Common Law identified as a world Unit
created by the Founding Fathers, defined by NW28, as follows:

““FED’ERAL”, a. [from L. f dus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng.

wed, Sax. .....
1. Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or
covenant between parties, particularly between nations.
2. Consisting in a compact between parties, particularly and chiefly
between states or nations; founded on alliance by contract or mutual
agreement; as a federal government, such as that of the United States.
3. Friendly to the constitution of the United States. [See the Noun]
FED’ERAL, } n. An appellation in America, given to the friends
of the constitution of FED’ERALIST, the United States, at its formation
 Page 41 of 95

and adoption, and the political party which favored the administration of
President Washington.” NW28

“Federalist” was not a political party, but a “Principal” of Liberty

and Sovereignty: An appellation in America, given to the friends of the
Constitution of the United States at its formation and adoption, which was
not a “DEMOCRACY” or a “REPUBLIC”, but in fact and Principal a
“Republican Form” of Government. Article IV§4 US Constitution
1788.

A “Democracy”, vests the right of suffrage to all classes; such was

Athens, which did not work, ever; DEMOCRACY was held synonymous
with COMMUNISM in the WWII training manual; and enemy of this
Union; A “Republic”, such as “ROME” was a system where the people
had no rights, but were privileged under the Pope and the consorting
Emperors; Neither of these two ALIEN SYSTEMS were ever considered
by the Founding Fathers in the establishment of our Federation, but were
in fact completely and totally denounced as being neither a pure Republic
or a Democracy, but a “Republican Form of government”. See Federalist
Papers ....Madison No. 10&48 p. 309; paragraph 6.

If the preceding definitions of facts are Lawful, and of sound

Principal and the Intent of Our Founders, it then follows that in order for
any qualified agent, State or Federal, City or County, appointed or
otherwise, who takes, or has taken an Oath to support and defend the
Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and that agent
becomes or aids a member of a non constitutional faction, then it follows,
that said agent, by becoming a “Trustee” of the People, who were
themselves, by the principals of the Constitution all “Federalists”, had to
also be “Federalists” themselves until that alien faction could eliminate or
annihilate the People, “Citizens of the State”, and this Federal Union. By
becoming a “Democrat” or “Republican”, or any faction not “Federalist”,
 Page 42 of 95

and being on the alien Banc Payroll, constitutes an act in direct violation
of that Oath, and “Treasonous” as to the People, Their Posterity and Their
Sovereignty!!!!!! Publius

In short, these factions by way of CODES, AMENDMENTS and

BANCING, and massive FRAUD and the extermination of the European
descendants of the Founding Fathers; the transformation of the People as
“Citizen of a State” of these United States of America, into subject chattel
citizens of the UNITED STATES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; Confounded and seized the Allodial
titles to Their Demain Manors converting them into “residential”,
commercial, agricultural, taxable, alien PUBLIC PROPERTY; And, by the
allowance of an alien constitutionally prohibited faction, have converted
their Substance and Coin and Labour into non redeemable, LEGAL
TENDER BANC PAPER.

This alien faction (BANCERS AND THEIR OVERLORDS) created

all the “CIVIL RIGHT’, “CIVIL CODES”, “CIVIL LIBERTIES”, AND
even A “CIVIL/SUBJECT citizen of the MCDC UNITED STATES”; and
under the guise of equality, failed to mention or use the words Sovereign,
Unalienable, or Prerogatives, or properly Capitalize “Citizen of a State”,
in any phrase, executive, legislative, or judicial ruling, to identify the
African Race; but in fact, not only identified them as SUBJECT TO
MCDC, but created a special rule applicable only to them for any of their
government created and granted ‘CIVIL RIGHT VIOLATIONS. See 42
U.S.C. § 1983 and Wadleigh v. Newhall. (1905 CC Cal) 136 F 941.

Sounds and looks like “Genocide” and “Treason” to Me. Publius

_______________________________________________________
______

Chapter 3. Their Sovereignty

 Page 43 of 95

The Sovereignty of the White People

“In the United States of America”, from the Revolution of (1776),

the following words and phrases, although taken from other languages in
other cultures, specifically and strictly “Defined”, apply to and are
applicable [O]nly, to the highest Title and Sovereignty of Man in relation
to his fellow Man, and so far, [O]nly in this American Union. Publius

By the Power of God, Man is vested with all the Power of

Sovereignty that he could, and does exercise in His Person and Privacy, or,
He can exercise it to violate the sovereignty of any or all other creatures of
God. But it is the omnipresence of God in Man that create the effect of
these caused violations called “consequences” that Man will learn in order
to attain the true nature of Heaven on Earth.

The Sovereignty and Prerogatives that Evolved onto the White

People as Citizens of a State at the Revolution (1776), also brought with it
the Principal use of “Proper Nouns” and Their common usage which
previously applied Only to the Crown Royals of Europe, but now, with
the separation of One People from the tyrants of the World, specifically
applies to “The White People”, as Descendants of Europeans born in
America. The following words identified as “Proper Nouns”, found in the
Original Script, and the Literal Print of the Constitution of the United States
of America (1788), are some of these Properly Capitalized Words;
examples; “People”, “Order”, “Justice”, “Union”, “Tranquility”,
“Welfare”, “Blessings”, “Liberty”, “Posterity”; “Powers”, “Members”,
“Year”, “States”, “Electors”, “Qualifications”, “Branch”,
“Representative”, “Citizen”, “Inhabitant”, “Vessels”, “Money”, “Coin”,
“Post Offices”,.&cccc; all of these Words, and others, which have
Special/Proper/Specific Meaning, Applicable only to the White Sovereign
People with newly vested Royal Prerogatives and Unalienable Rights with
 Page 44 of 95

Their newly vested Allodial/Demain Manor/Castle and Land Titles. The

subjects of England have no sovereignty, and still bow down to their
Crown and Pope, but the “Citizen of an American State”, unlike the
“subject of the crown”, has access through the Sovereign Door at the
Vatican.

“Sovereign”. A chief Ruler with Supreme Power; One possessing Sovereignty.

(q.v.) It is also applied to a King or other Magistrate with limited Powers. In the United
States the sovereignty resides in the Body of the People. Vide Rutherf. Inst. 282. The Union
and exercise of all human power possessed in a State; it is a combination of all Power; it is
the Power to do Everything in a State without accountability; to make laws, to Execute and
to Apply them: to impose and collect taxes, and, levy, contributions; to Make war or Peace;
to form Treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign Nations, and the like. Story on the
Const. Sec. 207.

But this definition “is” flawed because in the United States of

America, the “State” is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON, in the nature of a
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, that was created By AND For the White
Sovereign People; “It”, by and through its “Trustee/Agents, acts only in
accordance with That Law of the Constitution that was created explicitly
by the White People in Their Sovereign Political Capacity. Its
representatives, although individual Sovereign Citizens of a State on Their
Private Side, can act only in accordance with the Constitution specifically
on Their Trustee side. ‘The Trustee’, as they are now entitled, have no
personal sovereignty over the People, only official “Duty”; this “Duty”,
and the jurisdiction it commands, comes only within the limited and
specific Article, Section and or clause of the Constitution that created their
trustee position and its specific “Duty”. Their artificial SOVEREIGNTY is
only sovereign when dealing with the express powers vested in it while
dealing with other SOVEREIGNTIES; But, each of them, even though
expressly limited to a specific rule, could and have gone far beyond that
delegation and have taken part in the elimination of Our American
Common Law, and replaced it with A CODE SYSTEM, of which origin is
traced directly to an EMPEROR of a foreign jurisdiction.
 Page 45 of 95

It is a matter of strict Principal, and as a direct result of the White

People using the “Righteous Law” as a Foundation for Our Foundation,
that We are unique to all the other Sovereignties of the World. In this
uniqueness, We have decided to exercise our Sovereignty to follow the
Righteous Law, and to use its Principles for the creation of Our
Constitutions, Original State and Federal. They fall under the strict
definition of “The American Common Law”.

In OTHER SYSTEMS of government, that sovereignty resides in

the abstract, artificial Body of its Nation and represents the general
subject people as a whole. But these Powers are exercised by Delegation
or internal appointment, to biased individuals that are financially corrupted
in his/her private capacity and in consort with a greater influence that is
only interested in the total financial control of all the people and the land.

When strictly analyzed, this word “Sovereignty” when quoted,

enforced and identifying the American Government”, is, strictly speaking,
a “limited” Municipal Power, that is divided into three delegated powers;
namely, the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judiciary;

The First, [Legislative] is the LIMITED AUTHORITY and “Duty”

of its constitutionally qualified trustees, to exercise a specific, expressed,
delegated authority, conditionally limited to make [O]nly those specific
“Statutes” that conform to the specific subject of its specific jurisdiction
and the “American Common Law”, and “NOT OTHERWISE”; These
legislative “Trustees”, as they are now entitled, do not have free rein to
replace the American Common Law Constitutions with COMMERCIAL
CODES and RULES that may now be cited as authority, and then be used
by this new faction of solists to exterminate the “Private Prerogatives of
the Sovereign People” [Citizen of the State], or, to Convert the Sovereign
People into “subjects” of a foreign POWER; or to convert Their gold and
silver Coin into non-redeemable, foreign “PAPER”. The “FACTION” of
 Page 46 of 95

which I speak constitutes the Unauthorized, Constitutionally prohibited

migration and importation of a group of “ignorant people”, who’s hearts
are filled with their uncontrolled lust for power, their greed for money, the
exercise of vanity and ego to enforce their superiority over other People,
and a complete and total disdain and disregard for the Rights of others,
and their uncontrolled anger and relentless drive to completely exterminate
the “American Common Law”, its “Trust Constitutions”, and the
Sovereignty of its Individual White People as a “Citizen of one of the States
of this American Union”;

The second, [Executive] is the delegated Power and “Duty” of the

Constitutionally qualified “Trustees”, to execute the Statutes and sub
codes created by the Legislature that are expressly limited and authorized
that conform to the original intent of the “American Common Law”. By their
nature, under this system, the following terms, “Law of the Land” and “Lawful”, is
the “Constitution” as it was created directly by the People under God and interpreted
in strict accordance with Gods direct supervision and guidance;. The second term,
“Legal”, follows a CODE and subdivision of the Constitution but is not a Statute that
conforms in total to that specific article of the Constitution, or the American
Common Law. The American Common Law is the dividing line between the Private
Unalienable Prerogatives of the State Citizen and all other commercial powers of
government; The Bill of Rights is the best example of the Prohibitions of
government, and The 1st Naturalization Law is the best example of the limited power
of government to perpetuate the original status of the White People: see Chapter I
[The Law]

The third, [Judicial] is that limited Power to apply the Statutes in

strict accordance with the Law and Rights of the People, both Public,
COMMERCIAL and Private. This Branch is, divided into cases of the
American Common Law [Rights and Titles], by Equity [Contract], over
Admiralty [On the Water], or Maritime [between land and water]; all of
issues in dispute; But all said courts are bound by the specific rules that
apply in accordance with the American Common Law, and to Judge the
 Page 47 of 95

Disputes which arise among the Citizens, and to Punish American

Common Law crimes accordingly.
“Strictly speaking, in our Republican Forms of Government, the
Absolute Sovereignty of the Nation is in the People of the Nation as
“Citizens of a State”; (q.v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each State,
not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in The People of the
State. See Chisholm (q.v.) 2 Dall. 471; and vide, generally, 2 Dall. 433,
455; 3 Dall. 93; 1 Story, Const. Sec. 208; 1 Toull. n. 20 Merl. Repert. h.t.
(Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856). But, “In the United States of
America”, the first and primary attribute of “Sovereignty” lies, and is
found exclusively within the Body of each Man and Woman as a “Citizen
of the State” while acting in a strictly “Private Capacity”; and
PROTECTED by Grand Jury when that sovereignty has been violated.
Publius

To recall from Chapter I, [The Law] any and all the CODES and
RULES are of a COMMERCIAL NATURE, and follow the strict course
from a specific Statute, that must be cited as the authority to enact it, and
in order to govern, enforce and judge all those acts effecting the general
public by anyone who chooses to contract with it, “The GENERAL
PUBLIC”, whether it be a “Citizen of the State”, or citizen/subject of the
municipal corporation UNITED STATES, or a citizen or subject of a
foreign state, or a “Trustee”, or an alien, or even the UNITED STATES or
one of them; whether said contract be verbal, in writing, or by deed.
Again, see Hooven v. Evatt in Chapter 2, supra.

In Accordance with Our Federal System, and by the Principles of Its

Specific Terms, the State, and the United States are, by Our strict Federal
definitions, are “Not Sovereign” over the White People, but nothing more
than “Creatures of the People”, and therefore just artificial MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS, that can act only in an “OFFICIAL CAPACITY, and
then Only in accordance with their “Charter” [the Constitution], by their
“CORPORATE OFFICERS”, Which, for the Safety and Welfare of the
 Page 48 of 95

People, are also qualified From the People; but who swear by Their
Allegiance to their CHARTER, to agree to serve The People as Their
“TRUSTEES”. And if THEY should fail to Execute their sworn Duties in
strict accordance with the Law and Its Intent, or to propose the
extermination of Our Federal System, to be subjected to the Charge of
“Treason”

So, It follows that: The White People = A Citizen of His State, who
in Their collective capacity are = The Creators of the Law = That is The
Constitution = Which is An Express Trust of the White People =
Represented by the White Trustees of the White People = A State and the
States United in Congress = A Union of artificial MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS = The State and Federal CORPORATE OFFICERS,
Legislative, Executive, and Judicial = A system unique and un equaled to
any of the systems of this World.

It therefore naturally follows that:

Once the qualified Citizen of a State is chosen and Elected by the

Qualified Electors of His State, to take an active role in the Government as
a “TRUSTEE” of the People in Whole, He no longer executes any power
of Sovereignty but only “OFFICIAL’, and Only in strict accordance with
The delegated Mandates and Prohibitions under the Constitution from
which He voices His Oath of Allegiance on the Christian Bible. His
Personal Private Sovereignty and Ultimate Allegiance to God still remain;
but, these special attributes do not come within the scope or execution of
the TRUSTEE Duties of His TRUSTEE position in the GOVERNMENT.
Only by the express delegated authority of the Constitution does He, as
TRUSTEE, act, and not otherwise. If he fails to legislate, execute, or judge
the Law as Mandated, he does not belong to that Political Representative
Body entrusted to Him by The White People with Their power and
authority to protect the Secured, Unalienable Rights and Sovereignty of
“The White People. Publius
 Page 49 of 95

The following citations have not been overturned:

In M'Culloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405, 4 L. ed. 579, 601,

Chief Justice Marshall said:
'The government of the Union, then (whatever may be the influence
of this fact on the case), is, emphatically and truly, a Government of the
People. In form and in Substance it Emanates from Them. Its Powers are
granted by Them, and are to be exercised directly on Them, and for Their
Benefit.'
See also Martin v. Hunter, 1 Wheat, 304, 324, 4 L. ed. 97, 102,
opinion by Mr. Justice Story.
In Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 441, 15 L. ed. 691, 715, Chief
Justice Taney observed:
'The new government was not a mere change in a dynasty, or in a
form of government, leaving the nation or sovereignty the same, and
clothed with all the rights, and bound by all the obligations, of the
preceding one. But, when the present United States came into existence
under the new government, it was a new political body, a new nation, then
for the first time taking its place in the family of nations.'

And in Miller on the Constitution of the United States, p. 83,

referring to the adoption of the Constitution, that learned jurist said:

'It was then that a nation was born.' previous cites from Kansas vs.
State of Colorado 206 U.S. 46, 81(1907).

The primary attribute of “Sovereignty” is the “Land”.

The People conquered this Land,
not the government;
The People Hold this Land,
not the government;
 Page 50 of 95

The People Hold the Ultimate Title to this Land,

not the government;
The Peoples Domicile is in Law and by Conquest, a Demesne
Manor in this State, not a RESIDENCE, or Land Patent
of the government;
The People Till This Soil,
not the government;
The People Grow Their Food,
not the government;
The People Produce Their Posterity,
not the government;
The People Qualify Their Peers,
not the government;
God Created the People,
not the government;
The People Created the GOVERNMENT,
not the government;
The People Make the Law,
not the government;
The People are Exempt from all regulation in Their Privacy,
not the government;
God Created Unalienable Rights FOR the People,
not the government;
The People Exercise Unalienable Rights,
not the government;
The People, and only the People exercise the DELEGATED Power
of the government as TRUSTEES, who are then still subject to the Will of
the People, not the government;
The People as Citizen Trustees make the Rules,
not the government;
The People as Citizen Trustees Enforce the Rules,
not the government;
 Page 51 of 95

The People as Jurors decide the Law,

not the government;
The People are the Militia,
not the government;

These are just some of the Principles that Mandate why the White
conquering People as Citizens of a State are the Sovereign, and,
not the government;

So, just what exactly is the “GOVERNMENT”????

Our Republican form of Government, is comprised Of three branches

of the People as the “People”, as White Male European Citizens Electors
in and of the Several States 21 years+ ‘White Male Trustees 25 years+;
And for all the People, as White Europeans Born in One of the several
States or Naturalized in one of Their State Common Law Courts, from
Birth to Death and Their Posterity!!! All this, not for power, or glory, but
For One Purpose, to be a Vehicle of and for God By His Example to show
all People and Races the path Home to God.

So just what is Our “Republican Form of

Government”?????????????????????????

Many authorities, such as the Federalists, and many other different

so-call authorities have posed many varied examples of just what a
“Republican form of Government” might be; but in all these examples
they did not, without exception qualify the “Specific race, age, gender or
political status” that Our “Republican Form of Government” is
composed of.

First and foremost I previously cited the Federalists Papers as the

final Authority when interpreting the Constitution; and where the
Founding Fathers use Specific well known words and terms familiar to
 Page 52 of 95

them and their immediate Posterity. For example, in the Federalist Papers,
The word “People” was cited 620 times in that document, followed by
Europe, 42 times; “European” 12 times; “Citizen” 27 times;
Representative(s) 247 times; “Union” 376 times; “Federal” 325; the term
“States” 857 times; “State” 796 times; and the word “White” appears Zero,
none, not even 1 single time. According to Our Blood Line, as stated by
the Supreme Court of the Unite States of America, all these words were
and still are synonymous with the words “White People”, why? Because
they were all White Europeans born or naturalized in one of the several
States; see Dred Scott v. Sanford previously cited.

And therefore, For clarification of just what the Founding Fathers

meant when They identified all the special Parts of this Federal Union The
Common Ground for all the previously cited words used by the Founding
Fathers is in the one Common Race of the “White People”. This “White
Race” of European descent, is the Foundation of Our Federal Union.
Examples and use of the word “White” are available in more documents,
State and Federal, Supreme Courts, Law Dictionaries and in all the States
and Federal statutes from as many sources as you wish to discover prior to
the treasonous 15th so-called Amendment, and the so-called reconstruction
period following the ‘CIVIL WAR’;

So simply put, Our Republican form of Government is a Government

“Of”, “By”, and “For” the “White People”, and when stated “Of”, means:
1st :All White Males 21 and older, English Speaking, Citizen of a
State and qualified Elector; such as qualified by Article II §1, Constitution
of California (1850)
2nd : By the White People, who are All White Males 25 and older
Citizen of a State for Representative; 30 for Senator; 35 and older for
President; See Article I and II US Constitution; and,
3rd : For the White People that includes All of Them Male and
Female and Their Posterity.
 Page 53 of 95

Those of you people who are unwilling, or find yourself not

constitutionally or spiritually qualified to take part in Our Sovereignty, are
either transient aliens or just uninformed and or ignorant to the American
Common Law. It is by these facts of truth that you are subjected to the will
and control of our Police Power and its constitutionally authorized general
commercial codes. You know your status by the ID you carry and by your
belief in the commercial civil system of the government that issued the
COMMERCIAL ID’s that you carry and you live by. See Box below.

The concept of a Sovereign People is different from all the other

systems of the world, and is certainly extraordinary to most people; But, it
is never the less a physical and spiritual truth. The fact remains that too
many people, regardless of race, are to steeped in their own ethnic
traditions to be willing to break away from such controlled concepts of
their individual and mass collective ideas about a people not ruled by a
king or democratic type government. Such was the Act of Revolution
(1776) by Our White Founding Fathers. God takes no part in the fears of
people and therefore never expects to break the image of these peoples
insecurity. It is the nature of such a system of parental monarchal control
that actually deprives them of their discovery of the source of real security.
Despite the fact that their belief in such a controlled system exists for their
benefit and security, it still remains undiscovered until they take the fearful
step of total responsibility to acquire the spiritual freedom and Unalienable
Right to grow according to Gods Law, as apposed to Man’s civil codes.
Publius

_______________________________________________________
__________________
Chapter 4.
The People’s Rights
 Page 54 of 95

Where, on or in this Earth World, can a Hu man go, to exercise the

Freedom to follow a Law, that rewards Him for becoming a Conscious
Vehicle for God???

And if such a place does exist, does the Law of That Land Secure
His Right to Operate that Vehicle???

And If such a Law does exist, is it defined as “Inalienable” or

“Unalienable”???

We need look no further than the perfected examples cited by the

English Jurist Blackstone and his compilation of the “Kings Prerogatives”
listed in Chapter 7 of his Commentaries written on or about June 23, 1753;
some of which in the following list are paraphrased as they would appear
if, the Kings prerogatives were cited in Our Bill of Rights, or by the
Wisdom of Our early Supreme Courts:

The definition of “Prerogatives of the Crown is “Inalienable”

[NW28] and then follows with the Word “Unalienable”, both of which
are derived from many other cultures and languages, But, they include, but
are not limited to the following:

1st; His Right to Travel in his Private Carriage without an England

taxi registration plate, and or operator’s license , and mandatory
auto/carriage/motor vehicle insurance:
2nd; His Right to possess the Lawful Title [Manufactures
Certificate of Origin] for all his Private carriages: whether drawn by horse,
motor, engine, or other type of propulsion:
3rd; His Right to Contract Privately in any manner He chooses, and
to transport his Persons and or Property resulting from said Private
Contract upon his Rights of Way while displaying a Crown authorized
Exempt Placard/Plate: but being responsible for any damage he might
cause to the Pubic or Their constitutionally authorized Property:
 Page 55 of 95

4th; His Right to engage in unlimited Private Contracts without a

social security or other permissive type number:
5th; His Right to receive or pay gold and silver Coin in payment of
any debt or any agreeably completed Contract:
6th; His Right to hold and enjoy, and develop His Demesne/Demain
Manor [His Private Real Property] of a reasonable common law size, free
of any tax or rent, or code requirements:
7th; His Right to keep and bare arms of any nature [concealed or
otherwise]:
8th; His Right to choose and qualify his peers [for any dispute
arising between Him and his subjects/resident aliens, or Neighboring
Kings]:
9th; His Right to engage The woman of His choosing, under the
“Common Law” without permission of the parliament and or their
License:
10th; His Right to Qualify and Identify His Posterity [which, is none
of Parliaments business].

By The Revolution 1776, this Independent Sovereign Nation was

born; and the People surrendered “Nothing”; but, in fact gained all the
Prerogatives of the Crown, within this Nation. See Chisholm v. Georgia;
Lansing v. Smith; Dred Scott v. Sanford; the Original Constitutions both
California State (1849) and The Federal (1788 ) and Its 10 additional
Original Articles as the 1st and only Lawful Amendment (1791);
These Prerogatives of The People are, in a single word,
“Unalienable”;

“Unalienable” In the United States of America, “The state of a

Thing or Right which cannot be sold. Things which are not in
COMMERCE, such as a State Citizen’s Private Life, Private Liberty,
[Private Real Property to a non qualified State Citizen], and Private
Happiness. It also includes a Public road or a Right of Way; [the
Kings/State Citizens Highway] the Right to receive certified Article I, Sec
 Page 56 of 95

10 Cl. 1 Specie Coin for Our Labour; Natural Organic Food and Water
from Mineral rich Soil; a Minimum amount of Demain Allodial Land; a
Judicial Writ of Error; and last but not least to be identified in accordance
with Our Right of Sovereignty and State Citizenship; all of which are in
their Nature “Not subject to a Lien”, or “Alienable”, but in fact of “The
American Common Law”, Unalienable as to the Citizen of the State. See
“Citizen” defined and distinguished by Congress in the `1st Naturalization
Laws March 26, 1790, and the conflicting 2nd Naturalization Laws,
January 29, 1795, of which the second followed the establishment of D.C.,
wherein Congress states; “That any alien, being a free white person, may
be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them, on
the following conditions, and not otherwise:”

In the smallness of mans mind everything has a price tag, [even

the soil upon which he exists] or value of some form or other; But not
Until he is forced to pay for the consequences of his inequities, and
discovers that there is no amount of prayer, money, even a pound of flesh
or otherwise, that will satisfy this debt; then and only then does He
surrender to God the things of his dilemma which include his “
Attachments, Anger, Greed, Lust, Ego and Vanity” in total. Publius

In the United States of America (1776), The “Federalist Founders”

used the term “Prerogative” 29 times, and the term “sovereign” 92 in The
Federalist Papers. Although these words identified the crown heads of a
system The Founders wanted no Part of; But, Their act of Revolt, and the
Position created by That Revolt impregnated the very Principles of
Sovereignty and its Prerogatives in Them and Their Posterity, whether
They wanted Them or not. The Following is a List of the Sovereign
Prerogative Rights and Powers vested in the Citizen of the State at the
Revolution (1776), and Confirmed by Our highest Authorities:
 Page 57 of 95

1. , a “Private White Citizen of the State” of His/Her Domicile can

never be a “resident”, “tenant”, or “person”; (See Blackstone ch. 7 § 336)
and United Mine Workers 330 U.S. 258 footnote 23/24 (1947));
2., The “White Common Law Citizen”, qualified Elector, by His
Constitutionally elected Common Law Qualified House and Senate have
determined the nature and substance of His Coin; See US Const. Article I,
§ 10 Cl. 1, Unaltered;
3., The “Private White Citizen of the State” has the absolute
Prerogative Right to the Religious Freedoms of his Choice, See Article 1
of Amendment to the U.S. Const (1791);
4., The “Private White Citizen of the State”, in his Private capacity,
Travels upon His common Highways as a matter of “Unalienable Right”,
See Preamble U.S. Const.; En re: Stork 167 Cal. 294 (1914); (Cal. Stats.
1925, ch 412, p. 833. Approved by the Governor May 23, 1925.)
5., The “Private White Citizen of the State”, through His
Constitutionally qualified Representatives regulates all COMMERCIAL
ACTIVITY affecting the general Public at Large but that COMMERCIAL
delegated POWER DOES NOT regulate the White Citizen of the State
Who is “Exempt” while in the exercise of His Private Rights of Life,
Private Liberty, Owning Private Property or the pursuit of Private
Happiness; See Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43,74 (1905);
6., The “White Citizen of the State”, at the Revolution, “Surrenders
Nothing”, and owes Allegiance to no man, only God; See The Federalists
No. 84;
7., The “White Citizen of the State” is the fountain of Honor, of
Office, and of Privilege who, as the creator of the Constitution, erected and
OR disposed of all Federal political offices; See the Preamble and Article
IV Section 4, US Constitution;
8., The “White Citizen of the State” is the fountain of “Law”, and in
all cases effecting the Life, Liberty and Property of his Peers, He has the
final Word as to the Law, and the Facts; See Article VII of Amendment
(1791) and Taylor v. Virginia 100 U.S. 664 (1880);
 Page 58 of 95

9. , All Criminal proceedings are commenced “In The Name of the

White People”, by Grand Jury Indictment of His Peers, “White Common
Law Citizens of the State”, comprised of “White People Freeholders”,
which evidence must be supported by affidavits of two or more witnesses
or irrefutable fact, and prosecuted by the Qualified Elected State Attorney
General, as the Highest “Common Law Officer” in the State; by a Judge
Elected by the Qualified Common Law White Citizen of the State;
10., The Greatest wrong a Citizen of this “Federal” State can do to
Him/Herself and the “Posterity”, is to Allow the Unalienable, God given
“Private Prerogatives” Secured by the Founding Fathers, For these United
State of America, to be converted into CORPORATE PRIVILEGES, and
by the “ARTIFICIAL STATUS” listed in the Red Box, are now subject to
and controlled by a CORPORATE LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE AND
JUDICIAL POWER, who all receive their compensation from the alien
FEDERAL RESERVE. Publius
_______________________________________________________
_______________

Chapter 5.

The Peoples Land

“Land; The United States is denominated the land of freedom.”

Noah Webster (1828)
The primary attribute of “Freedom” is “Sovereignty” which leads Us
to the foundation of the Sovereignty of the People of the several States of
this American Federal Republican system, which is, “The Land”. As
previously cited from the Federalists Papers, the term “People”, is
synonymous with European and appears 620 times and 54times
respectively. So just who and what were the Founding Fathers??? the
answer is unquestionably answered as, “People” from “Europe” the
“Land” of the “White Face”!!
 Page 59 of 95

If this sounds like a bigoted or prejudiced racial statement, then the

person reading this Dictionary is either ignorant of the Law, or has no
concept of one People exercising the God given Sovereignty that All
People have access to, but that only the White European People in the
several States have fought, bled, and died, so that their Posterity might
take part in this unique example and American experiment. The average
person, regardless of race, has a natural fear of self responsibility. He/She,
is secure in the control of a few. This is the Nature of Man on Earth. But
this Federal System was birthed for those of Us who are Responsible. Our
only question might be’, is just how far backwards do the responsible
People among Us have to be driven before They again Stand up and Say
“Enough is Enough”??? Publius

In Repetition:

The White European People conquered this Land,

not their government;
The White European People Hold this Land,
not their government;
The White European People hold the Ultimate Title to this Land,
not their government;
The White European Peoples Domicile is, in Law, a Demesne Manor
in this State, not a Patent or RESIDENCE, and is subject only to God,
not their government;
The White European People till This Soil,
not their government;
The White European People Grow their Food in the soil of this Land,
not their government;
The White European People entrusted their Unalienable Rights to the
Land, in a government elected from The White European People ; by The
White European People; and, For The White European People,
not of, by, or for the government;
 Page 60 of 95

This started with a “Revolution” (1776) and has culminated through

many carefully calculated wars, both foreign and domestic; These wars,
unlike the Revolution of 1776, were not of, by or for the People, but were
carefully calculated but necessary. This wanton disregard for human life is
almost unprecedented through Out History. This point is not easily
arguable, but the resolution of the true cause of these wars will bear the
fruit in the form of an effect called Knowledge and Wisdom. From the
Effect will come the renewed knowledge of just exactly what is meant by
an “Act of Treason” against the Sovereignty of the White People. It need
not be redefined, but simply understood.

Once you turn over Your Law of the Land, the key to Your vault, the
Title to Your Land, and the souls of your Posterity to a bunch of
THIEVING BANCERS and their MURDERING DIRECTORATES, you
should not be at all surprised that you have now, as stated by the
Federalists, woken up a slave in the land that your Founding Fathers died
to Secure for You!

If those People among Us who cannot trace their race to the

Founding Fathers still contend that they have been vested with all the
“Unalienable Rights” secured to the White People in these several States,
now is the time to quit crying for your CIVIL RIGHTS, and Demand
Sovereign Prerogatives. There is no other way. The first principal for the
defeat of a Nation is to eliminate the Sovereign People by combining them
with a subject class, separating them from their Land; poison their soil,
their water, their air; Steel their Coin and debase their posterity; in other
words, infiltrate, divide and conquer.

In order to grasp a better understanding of the Principal of

Sovereignty when taking care of the Soil, we will look at an overreaching
Act of congress called “PRE-EMPTION”; and for clarification, is another
word having its roots in a monarchal system such as Europe, from whence
 Page 61 of 95

it comes. More important is the fact that this Act falls in line with all the
other terms and words that came into being just following the CIVIL
WAR. The only reason that I use this act is that it uses certain word and
terms expounding the American Common Law Principles applicable to the
proper care taking by a White European Citizen of a State, of the Soil of
His Demesne/Demain Manor/Castle; BUT this ACT IS IN NO WAY
BINDING UPON THE “Common Law Claim” CLAIM OF A “White
Citizen of a State”, especially where said Land is now solely within one of
the already establish Federal States, and, has already been settled,
occupied, surveyed and speculated. Pre-Emption = Claim before Pay.

Revised Statutes, FORTY-THIRD CONGRESS 1873-‘74;

TITLE XXXII THE PUBLIC LANDS; CHAPTER FOUR SEC.
2257 through SEC. 2288.
This Act Presumes to place most of the Land under the general
jurisdiction of MCDC, [MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA] and under the control of the foreign BANCING CARTEL
who instructs the President [§2207]. It also only applies to the Specific
“citizen of the UNITED STATES”, MCDC[§2259]. It further presumes to
limit the amount of land to any claim of a “citizen of the United States”, to
that of 1/4 Section, or 160 Acres [§2259]. But a Citizen of a State could
acquire what ever amount necessary for His one and only Demesne
Manor, His “Domicile”, but only One and in Only One State, or a
territory[§2262]. The Price for this minimum amount is in certified Specie
Coin of the Realm, and still is only enough to cover the cost of the Survey
[§2237et seq.]. He, the Claimant, must also Declare that He will not
speculate the Land. Wow, the last principal
is out The Window!! [figuratively speaking]

So, here is the chain of events leading up to and including all the
Land in these Several States, from the Revolution, to the present
residential property tax assessor and non-redeemable banc inflated paper.
 Page 62 of 95

First Principal Established by the Revolution 1776:

“Allodial Title to all Land is in the People “White European Citizens

in the several States”.”

“Title” Exclusive Possession; (Noah 1828) Parallel to Right,

Unalienable and A Prerogative: In the United States of America, the
highest Human Title is a “Citizen of the State” 2 Dall @455; followed by
the Union of Citizens which is the State; followed by the

highest Title to Land within the State which is “Allodial”, and then
Demain, or Demesne Manor, the Personal, Private Abode, Domicile and
Castle of the Sovereign, all of which are ‘Secured’ by God and the
“Constitution of the United States of America (1788)”; as confirmed by
the Revolution of 1776 and Miranda vs. Arizona 384 U.S. @ 491 (1965).

“Allodial” Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service;

held independent of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal. Blackstone.
Freehold Estate; land which is the absolute property of the owner; real
estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent,
service, or acknowledgment to a superior. In the United States of
America, Most Lands are Allodial. Noah (1828). In the United States of
America the Right to hold this Allodial Title to the Private Land in one of
the Several Federal States of the American Union is the Prerogative of the
White People of the United States of America as a qualified “Citizen of
the State of His or Her Domicile”, which then is equal to the “Crown
Land” in Europe defined as Demesne or Demain by Noah (1828). Publius

Second Principal Established by the Revolution 1776:

On the other hand, there was a “Land Patent”: THIS feudal PHRASE
came here before the Revolution, but was a familiar Term with the
Founders. But, like the term ”tenants in fee simple” WAS AND IS a
 Page 63 of 95

creature of England belonging to the act of the Crown of Europe and its
Monarchal system. The term “Land Patent” was exclusively used by the
Crown to identify the highest land title issued under His authority to HIS
most loyal subjects. In the United States of America, the executive
authority of both State and Federal Government, have no such pre
eminence, or Sovereign Prerogative, but by custom and feudal usage,
have presumed to be the fountain from which this highest feudal title to
land is issued. They call this title a “Land Patent”. A Land Patent is, like a
subject, and a creature of the feudal system such as England, where the
king is the possessor of all the Land in Allodium, and has the prerogative
to issue this Land Patent to a subject of his own choosing, or to void said
Patent at his own prerogative. Therefore a Land Patent in The United
States is nothing more than a sub title that the government has issued
under many different treaties or claims to others having no sovereign
Prerogatives to the Allodial Title. Said Patent is subject to seizure through
a process known as “Eminent Domain”, but only by the final act of 12,
White European Citizen Freeholders Domiciled in Their Demain Manor in
the State and County of the Patent being seized.

Herein lies the greatest dilemma of Our Time!!! Just what should
The “Allodial Title” to Land in one of the Several States claimed
adversarialy or by purchase by a White Sovereign State Citizen look Like,
and what “Words” of Law should be used to describe It?????

It has already been discovered, that as a matter of Natural Law, the

“European People” of these United States of America, with the victory
Revolution of 1776, also took on all the Sovereignty and Prerogatives of
the Crowns of Europe within Their respective State. Lansing vs. Smith;
Scott v. Sanford; Chisholm v. Georgia supra;

The only problem is that they did not assume the Properly worded
Title Documents equal to Their newly acquired Sovereign Status. This
leads Us to discover the actual Word or combination of Words that is
 Page 64 of 95

correct in Law, and Proper to identify the “Title of Land” Actually held
by the Crown/King/Princes of Europe as His Private “Domicile”, that does
now Lawfully apply to the People?? This leads Us to the term: “Crown
Land”.

The Third Principal established by the Revolution 1776:

“Crown Land” The demesne lands of the Crown according to Noah

1828; Eng. law. The name given to that portion of the lands of a manor
and or Mansion, which the lord retained in his own hands for the use of
himself and family. These lands were called terra dominical or demesne
lands, because they were occupied by the lord, or dominus manerii, and his
servants, &c. 2 Bl.
Com. 90. Vide Ancient Demesne; Demesne as of fee; and Soil
assault demesne. Bouvier’s 1856; 1914;

By the Law of Nature, and the Common Law of America, a

Citizen of the State, in order to support Himself and His Family of four,
more or less, according to the Laws and Principals of Sovereignty, must
have access to a piece of Land large enough to enforce His Sovereignty
and supply the following elements:

Have a Well, or free access to Crown Water;

Plant a Garden with Fruit Trees; properly fertilized and

maintained according to the Common Law; being disciplined to turn the
crop under at least every 7 years;

Have Chickens, and or such other domesticated Animals as He

sees fit; And the Land to grow Their Food; also including the Right to fish
and take such game as necessary for His subsistence and that of His
Family;
 Page 65 of 95

This Land must also be large enough for a leach field or septic
tank that does not Trespass into a Neighbors Land, or into His own
Garden.

A Section, being 1 mile square, was not uncommon, and is in

fact a minimum size identified in our Judicial history describing this very
Principal.

However you view this chapter on Land, it will be seen as common

to the Planet.

The following word has no place in the Demain Title to the Private
Property of a White Citizen of the State;

“Fee” in Noah(1828) equal to, meaning a “Loan” of Land, an estate

in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition
of personal service, or other condition...A fee then is any land or tenement
held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and
feud . All the land in England, accept the Crown Land, is of this kind.”
Noah did not understand the true nature of a Sovereign People
or their Unalienable Rights. All the examples of title to land in all the
English Dictionaries refer to definitions of a Feudal relationship between
the subjects, as tenants in fee simple, or other fee, and the Crown. All land
in Europe is Allodial as applied to the Crown, but feudal as applied to His
subjects. A Land Patent owes its existence to this feudal relationship but
still is not a Title word to be used to describe the Crown Land in Europe
or, the White European Citizen of the State at the Revolution (1776), the
Peoples Land in the United States of America.

The Fourth Principal of the Revolution 1776:

“State”: The unanimous consent of the “People” of the colonies,

then, [60 U.S. 393, 502] to the power of their sovereign, 'to dispose of
 Page 66 of 95

and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory' of the
Crown, in 1774, was deemed by them as entirely consistent with
opposition, remonstrance, the renunciation of allegiance, and proclamation
of civil war, in preference to submission to his claim of supreme power in
the territories. I pass now to the evidence afforded during the Revolution
and Confederation. The American Revolution was not a social revolution.
It did not alter the domestic condition or capacity of persons within the
colonies, nor was it designed to disturb the domestic relations existing
among them. It was a political revolution, by which thirteen dependent
colonies became thirteen independent States. 'The Declaration of
Independence was not,' says Justice Chase, 'a declaration that the United
Colonies jointly, in a collective capacity, were independent States, &c., &
c., &c., but that each of them was a sovereign and independent State; that
is, that each of them had a right to govern itself by its own authority and its
own laws, without any control from any other power on earth.' (3 Dall.,
199; 4 Cr., 212.) Scott supra @ p.502

The Fifth Principal of the Revolution 1776:

So, From Sovereign in 1776 to SUBJECT in 1866; White European

Citizen [first Letter Capitalized] of a Federal, Republican State, United for
Their Benefit, Safety, Security, and the Perpetual Existence and
Enforcement of Their Sovereignty, and for the Sovereignty of Their
Posterity;

Enter the 2nd naturalization law and the term phrase, a “citizen of the
UNITED STATES; of Which Our Highest Court of California has
declared that; “there is no such thing as “citizen of the UNITED
STATES”. See Ex parte Frank Knowles 5 Cal. 300 (1855) ;

Enter the 11th so-called amendment exterminating the Right of a

White Sovereign Citizen of a State, to sue a State of White Sovereigns,
who, by the fraudulent act of Their executive trustee, violated the most
 Page 67 of 95

fundamental American Common Law principal and, the exclusive remedy

of and “Action of Assumpsit”, on the obligation and duty of a Federal
State, after it consummated a Lawful Contract that helped win the
Revolution; See Chisholm supra; and Madison Federalists #43 Sec 8 on
“Amendment/Error”;

Enter the “BANK”; Let’s see if WE, THE BANCER MONEY

CHANGERS, can con these “White European Sovereigns” into giving US
all Their gold and silver in exchange for short term paper redeemable in
nothing; And, Their land for worthless “PROMISSORY NOTES” and
DEEDS OF TRUST; And, Their Sovereign State Citizenship for a “BANC
CARD” and SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT; And, Their Posterity in
exchange for a “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” on “BANC NOTE BOND
PAPER”, All, without a single shot being fired!!! It’s not rocket science,
but it is a consequence of, FRAUDULENT, TREASONABLE ACTS
against The White People.

Enter the “CIVIL WAR”; where more White Sovereign State

Citizens were exterminated by their own fellow Sovereign Citizens, than
any other war until Vietnam; and in the process, by all the legislation of a
corrupt alien BANC system, shot Lincoln, and completely converted all
the White Sovereign State Citizens into the very status of a “subject
freedman” that the CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS supposedly released from The
bondage of their White Masters by the “FREEDMANS BUREAU BILL”;
also including the unconstitutional 13th, 14th, 15th and ALL THE
FOLLOWING SO-CALLED fraudulent AMENDMENT’s TO THE
“White European State Citizens Federal Constitution (1788/91)”;

Enter the Reconstruction Period 1866 to present; With the

elimination of all reference to “Citizen of the State”, by and through the
intent of that FACTION OF BANC CRIMINALS, they enacted a flood of
CODES, CIVIL, CRIMINAL, COMMERCIAL &cccccccccccc.. In place
of Our American Common Law, vesting their BAR ASSOCIATION with
 Page 68 of 95

exclusive right and knobble titles (esquire) and CIVIL CODE POWER to
finish the job;

Enter all the words and phrases now unquestionably accepted by the
White Posterity, that will, if unchallenged, end the reign of a limited
government controlled only by the Sovereignty, Knowledge and Wisdom
of the Founding Fathers. Publius

_______________________________________________________
______

Chapter 6; Their GOVERNMENT and its PROPERTY

“PEOPLE/PERSON”, [CORPORATION] in all UPPER CASE, is

neither a “noun” or a “Proper Noun”. IT designates an ARTIFICIAL
ENTITY of non organic substance. Its common use is found in ITS
CHARTER with the general identification of “A CORPORATION”.
CORPORATIONS are “CREATURES OF THE STATE”. ITS
OFFICERS act according to its CHARTER and not otherwise. See Hale
vs. Henkel 201 U.S. 43,74 (1906);

It follows that the 14TH SO-CALLED AMENDMENT TO THE US

CONSTITUTION consummated the earlier established creation of an
artificial citizen, commonly known as a “citizen of the UNITED
STATES”, which by a decision from the California State Supreme Court
entitled Ex Parte Frank Knowles 5 Cal 300 (1855) previously cited, the
Court, after examining the true nature of Our Republic, and the actual
wording used by the Founders in the 1st Naturalization Law, stated that:
“There is no such thing as a citizen of the United States”.

For further personal examples inspect all the government issued

DOCUMENTS with Your all UPPER CASE NAME on it. They are,
 Page 69 of 95

without exception, ALL in ALL UPPER CASE LETTERS. Don’t forget

Your:
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX assessment;
NATURALIZATION CERTIFICATE
WATER AND POWER BILL;
BANC/K RECORDS;
BIRTH CERTIFICATE on BANK NOTE BOND PAPER
SOCIAL SECURITY CARD;
DRIVERS LICENSE;
INSURANCE CARD;
INS GREEN CARD,
VOTER REGISTRATION;
DEATH CERTIFICATE…………………………….
and see the Red box below;

all of which in fact identifies You, whether White, Black, Yellow or

Red, Law People “Citizen of the State” or otherwise, as NOTHING
MORE than a “ LEGAL COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL FICTITIOUS
PERSON” created and MORTGAGED by Our State and Federal Trustees,
to A FOREIGN PRIVATE BANC. Still another act of Treason by THE
Trustees.

This FOREIGN BANK, by way of carefully infiltrated directorates,

and the general ongoing Ignorance of the “White People”, continue to
allow these treasonous acts that also converted each of the Federal,
Republican States, into “TAXING DISTRICTS”, BY another fraudulent
EXECUITIVE ORDER CALLED , “THE ZIP CODE”, and by the
unconscious permission of the IGNORANT “White Posterity of the
People” of “The United States of America”. You are, by the nature of
Your Identification, AND unchallenged use of the worthless fiat paper
money you carry, a “CORPORATION”, “ARTIFICIAL COMMERCIAL
PERSON” BANC CHATTEL, and the PROPERTY OF THE “PRIVATE”
FEDERAL RESERVE BANC; and , the FEDERAL RESERVE is not the
 Page 70 of 95

PROPERTY of Our Federal Government, but is, in fact, the Property of

PRIVATE STOCK HOLDERS. See Bretton Woods Agreement. Those
individuals in Our Government who allowed this attack upon our
economic foundation, has committed “Treason” at the highest level against
the People and Our Sovereignty. These acts of Treason continue today by
those individual trustees who have taken an oath to uphold and defend Our
Constitution, but instead continue to take part in the enforcement of
fraudulent treasonous foreclosures, treasonous jailing of patriots for
protesting, THEIR FRAUDULENT ACTS, and a list to long to mention
here. They are adhering to Our ENEMIES, giving them Aid and Comfort.
This is American Common Law Treason.

The following BOX includes, but is not limited to a list of THE

specific words and phrases defined and used by the BANC system which
is foreign to the “Private Rights of the People” and Their American
Common Law Constitutions. These WORDS AND PHRASES have been
used to identify the foreign subjects, the foreign jurisdictions, and the
COMMERCIAL power enforced by the many LEGAL agencies over the
subjects of each word or phrase;
MOST THINGS, WORDS, PHRASES, AND PLACES FOUND IN
THE CROWNS
BOX

The act of “BANCING”; have a“BANC ACCOUNT”; live in “THE

UNITED STATES” (D.C.) March 26, 1790"; are a citizen identified in
“THE 2ND NATURALIZATION ACT January 29, 1795, Stat II Chap. XX,
Section 1.”; have a “LAND PATENT’; are a “citizen of the UNITED
STATES”; “EMPLOYE OF D.C.”; a “TAXPAYER” (1862) SEE 26 USC
§ 6331(a); claim your rights under the “CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS” 1866; are
a “CIVILIAN” (subject to the ROMAN CIVIL LAW); have a
“MARRIAGE LICENSE” (1868) (inter marriage); are an “EMPLOYE”
(Bouvier’s page 589, (1890); “The FEDERAL RESERVE ACT” (1913);
 Page 71 of 95

The “STOCK MARKET”; a “BIRTH or DEATH CERTIFICATE” on

BANK NOTE PAPER; the “PEOPLE” mortgaged by “HOUSE JOINT
RESOLUTION 192 June 5, 1933"; “The People” become “BANKERS”
by creating BANC “PROMISSORY NOTES”; signing a “BANK
SIGNATURE CARD”; acceptance of “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES”
1934; “BORROWER, DEBTOR”; FTB 540“resident”; “RESIDENT of
the STATE”; “TENANTS IN FEE SIMPLE”; “person”;“ subject to All
the AMENDMENTS To the Constitution of the United States of America,
starting with the so-called 11th amendment on”; use of TITLE 42 § 1983;
NAME IN “ALL UPPER CASE”; subject to “MOTOR VEHICLE
CODE”; “DRIVER’s LICENSE”; “operator of MOTOR VEHICLE
(1925); “MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND PINK SLIP”;
“RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX”, “ INCOME TAX”;“SOCIAL
SECURITY” 1935; live in a “ZONING IMPROVEMENT PLAN ZIP
Code”26USC §7621 TAXING DISTRICT; “OBAMA CARE”; 28 U.S.C.
CODE RULE 1 THROUGH 81 combining law and equity; “THE
PATRIOT ACT”; & c.......

If you find yourself identified by any one of the subjects, living in

the geographies, in agreement with the titles, or names, or have signed any
one or more of the applications, or used any one or more as your authority
to exercise a privilege in this box, your private property, Personalty, is,
and you have agreed to be and are, the owned subject of a foreign power,
well known to the Founding Fathers. These things and others in their
likeness are the very cause that brought about the creation and
enforcement of the “Magna Charta”, and the “Revolution and Declaration
of Independence on July 4, of 1776, and all the other Sources of Our
White Sovereign Liberties!!! Publius
End of Box

These words and others have been used by the money changers,
THROUGH A GENERALLY ACCEPTED PRACTICE OF SILENT
FRAUD, to transform the WhitePeople and ‘Their Posterity back into the
 Page 72 of 95

very thing that the Founding Fathers fought and died to free themselves
and their Posterity from. Simply stated, SUBJECTS of the Crown, and the
live stock of a “Cestui Que Trust” under the Pope, dating back to the
1300s and the time of “Magna Charta”:

ENTER THE WORDS, AND PHRASES; CIVIL, CIVIL LAW,

CIVIL CODE, CIVILIAN:
These words emanate from a time controlled by EMPERORS AND
TYRANTS. The most noted being JUSTINIAN. Hence the word
“Justice” or “Equality” or “EQUITY” or “contract”.
CIVIL LAW and its variations, emanated from the writings of the
subject underlings of the EMPEROR JUSTINIAN, which writings were
founded upon the EMPEROR, and the roman citizens subject status, but,
which has no authority or Principal what so ever over the American
Common Law Rights of “We The White People” so long as We do not
engage the Public At Large. This CODE SYSTEM was completely
unknown to the Principles of Our Republican Form of Government. A
search of all The Sources of Our Liberties, will show the complete lack of
such a CODE used as authoritative reference by any of Our Founders, in
Their Revolutionary Act of establishing the Sovereignty and the Private
Prerogatives of “We The White People”; Or, for the enforcement by Our
Founders to, of, or from the “ROMAN CIVIL LAW”.

Our Republican Form of Government was Secured by the

Federalists and was founded upon Our God Given Unalienable Rights, not
by any dictate of man or his “civil codes”. The child of 3 is no more equal
in common sense to a common law adult of 12, who, is, in comparison, not
equal to a civil code adult of 18, who, is not equal to a Common Law
Citizen of a State at the sovereign age of 25. In Our American Common
Law, equality is an attribute of the highest example of the Righteous Law,
it’s Our execution of self, as a Vehicle for God by each of Us upon Our
fellow Man.
 Page 73 of 95

But, enter the CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS (1866) (anti slavery) applying
only to the black slaves, now “freedmen”; and for the sake of repetition
and redundancy; now takes on the attributes of a Monarchal Democracy.

The term “civil law” appears but twice in the “Federalists Papers”,
first in Hamilton No. 81 p. 488, but is used expressively only to
distinguish a “civil-law mode of trial”, as opposed to and distinguished
from “criminal trial”, but no mention or reference was ever made to any
writing or other rule identified as a “CIVIL CODE”; Second, in Hamilton
83, it appears as “proceeds in general either according to the course of the
canon or civil law, without the aid of a jury.” Again, its reference is to a
feudal system, but without reference to any “CIVIL CODE” from Our
Founding White Federalists Fathers.

Since its creation, The phrase “THE UNITED STATES”, has

been enlarged and used as silent Fraud, to identify and define more things
than can reasonably be calculated; and in fact has been given several
different meanings by the Supreme Court: From at least (1790), just
following the 1st Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790. This phrase
‘UNITED STATES’ has been used to include but not limited to identify
some of the following:
‘THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA’, which is by Law and Principal,
the MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Of, By and For the White European
Citizens of a State United, who in their Sovereign capacity established to
the World, a Trust that in Law and Principal is its CHARTER, and which
created and became the Peoples CORPORATION, improperly named,
“THE UNITED STATES” by Act of July 16, 1790;

Our miss guided, carrot following Trustees have become the bullies
on the Block called Earth, and by and through their coalition of tyrants
have used its CORPORATE NAME “THE UNITED STATE”, to enforce
its CORPORATE JURISDICTION, and seize other “PROPERTY
HOLDINGS” OVER ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING that does not
 Page 74 of 95

have the Wisdom, or THE Power to repel its onslaught; such things and
places include but are not limited to the following:

NATIONAL PARKS; Demesne Manors of the People ‘PORTO

RICO’ Ceded to the United States On September 29, 1898 (Treaty of
Peace); also including ‘GUAM’; ‘AMERICAN SAMOA’; and the
‘VIRGIN ISLANDS’; and By Article I§8, Cl 17, US Constitution: all ‘US
FORTs and US ARSENALS’; ‘US MAGAZINES’; all ‘US DISTRICT
COURTS’ and ‘The District Court of the United States’; And by Article
IV§3, Cl. 2; THE 3 TO 12 MILE LIMIT OFF SHORE; the Boundary
Lines separating the 50 States from each other and the adjoining Sovereign
Nations; US citizens, domestic or abroad; EVEN A US BATTLESHIP
CRUISING IN FOREIGN WATERS; and a ‘US EMBASSY’ ON
FOREIGN SOIL. THIS PHRASE has also been used throughout the 50
U.S. CODES to define AND ENFORCE its “COMMERCIAL/
ADMIRALTY/ and MARITIME” jurisdictions within and OVER some
one or All of the Several 50 States of the American Union. See Hooven vs.
Evatt 324 U.S. 652,671,672 (1944); Also see TITLE 18 UNITED
STATES CODE §§ 5, & 7; just to name just a few.

However, for the clarification of all you ignorant civil war type
rebels who have taken part in the unauthorized acts of rebellion against the
corporate UNITED STATES because of its far overreaching Land
acquisitions in Your State, you might take a careful look at the following
Supreme Court case: in .Collins vs. Yosemite Park Co. 304 U.S. 518,530
(1938); whatever the general power and jurisdiction of the UNITED
STATES might be, in the act of acquiring property, and to exercise its
jurisdiction over a NATIONAL PARK, THIS Court fails to see any
evidence of a constitutionally authorized Fort, Arsenal, or other needful
building that is or will be constructed on or in the Park giving the US total
jurisdiction over the entire Park. It is not clear from the claim of the United
State just how It has manage to acquired possession and control over this
Park solely within the exterior boundary of that State, but it did not come
 Page 75 of 95

within the operation of Article I § 8, Cl 17; and it is evident that unless a

US fort, arsenal, or other needful building can be found there, it follows by
the prohibitions of the constitution on this subject, that this, or any other
Park of like kind, does not belong to the US, but, in fact of Law, belongs
to the White Citizens of This State and not otherwise. This overreaching
jurisdiction is just another ploy, exercised by the BANC To take back the
People, and Their Land, and exterminate this Annoying experiment of the
Sovereign People, and reestablish the ultimate, and unlimited Royal
Crown jurisdiction over the Planet.

In relation to the rights and property of our Government, the

following must be considered;

“Inalienable” . According to Noah (1828)..the dominions of the king

are inalienable; by this principal, The title to the Lands of the Crown of
England are “Allodial” and held by military force and have not been
transferred to a subject accept by Royal Grant, or be taken by the king of
Spain accept by war. The Unalienable Rights exercised by Americans are
of God and intended to be exercised and shared by all The People, all
countries and all faiths and all races. These Rights are alienable as applied
to the Kings power who can do what ever he wishes as long as his subjects
are happy. There rights are only privileges that emanate from the Crown as
they have no concept of Unalienable; On the other hand, under Our
Republican form of Government, the Citizen of the State is not the fountain
of Rights which flow from God the Creator, but the vehicle for the
passing on The Wisdom and Sovereignty. The Citizen, by the Preamble to
Our Federal Constitution, has the Duty and Obligation to teach this
Principal to the Posterity, in order that these Unalienable Rights continue
to be enforceable and perpetual. Publius

We now come to the specific Words and Phrases used by the

Founding Federalists to establish the most People Friendly Government,
following the consummated Act of Rebellion1776:
 Page 76 of 95

“Federal” /”Federated”/”Confederated” In The United States of

America, as the Constitution of the United States of America;
Confederated and United in a League as in the United States of America,
Leagued between Princes or States; To Unite as Princes or States; a Union
of Princes or “Citizens of the State” in “The United States of America”; a
Federal Union of Federal States, composed of White Citizens of each of
the Federal States; see Noah Webster (1828) Article IV Section 4 states:
“The Federal United States of America shall guarantee to every State of
this Union a “Republican Form of Government”. As Opposed to a
“DEMOCRACY”;…

The following quote is an actual quote from the WWII Training

Manual, that was used as a propaganda machine to convince another large
number of a combination of both State and US Citizens and citizens to
give their life for a foreign BANC. UNDERLINE, HIGHLIGHT and some
corrected Capitalization added for proper emphasis:

“The following is taken from the TRAINING MANUAL} WAR

DEPARTMENT No. 2000-25} WASHINGTON, November 30, 1928.
CITIZENSHIP Prepared under direction of the Chief of Staff. This manual
supersedes Manual of Citizenship Training. The use of the publication
"The Constitution of the United States," by Harry Atwood, is by
permission and courtesy of the author. The source of other references is
shown in the bibliography.

120. Comparative analysis. — The following comparative analysis

shows the Principal Characteristics of the three forms of government:
Autocracy: Authority is derived through heredity. People have no
choice in the selection of their rulers and no voice in making of the laws.
Results in arbitrariness, tyranny, and oppression. Attitude toward
 Page 77 of 95

property is feudalistic. Attitude toward law is that the will of the ruler shall
control, regardless of reason or consequences.
Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through
mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression. Results in
mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property
rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate,
whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice,
and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in
demagoguism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Republic: Authority is derived through the election by the People of
public officials best fitted to represent Them. Attitude toward Property is
respect for laws and Individual Rights, and a sensible economic
procedure. Attitude toward Law is the administration of justice in accord
with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to
consequences. A greater number of Citizens and extent of territory may be
brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either
tyranny or mobocracy. Results in Statesmanship, Liberty, Reason,
Justice, Contentment, and Progress. Is the "standard form" of government
throughout the World. A Republic is a form of government under a
Constitution which provides for the election of (1) an Executive and (2) a
Legislative body, who working together in a Representative capacity, have
all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise
revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create (3) a
Judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts
and to recognize (4) certain inherent Individual Rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are
drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you
are drifting into democracy. — Atwood.
121. Superior to all others. — Autocracy declares the divine right of
kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or
unjustly administered.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly
tried without success.
 Page 78 of 95

Our Constitutional Fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness

of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind,
defined a representative Republican Form of Government. They "made a
very marked distinction between a Republic and a democracy * * * and
said repeatedly and Emphatically that They had founded a Republic."
Madison, in the Federalist, emphasized the fact that this government
was a Republic and not a democracy, the Constitution makers having
considered both an autocracy and a democracy as undesirable forms of
government while "a Republic * * * promises the cure for which we are
seeking." In a democracy the people meet and exercise the government in
person. In a Republic They assemble and administer it by Their respective
agents. — Madison.
The advantage which a Republic has over a democracy consists in
the substitution of representatives whose enlightened views and virtuous
sentiments render them superior to local prejudices and to schemes of
injustice. — Madison.
The American form of government is the oldest republican form of
government in the world, and is exercising a pronounced influence in
modifying the governments of other nations. Our Constitution has been
copied in whole or in part throughout the earth.
122. No direct action. — Under the representative form of
government there is no place for "direct action." The inherent
characteristic of a republic is government by representation. The people
are permitted to do only two things; they may vote once every four years
for the executive and once in two years for members of the legislative
body. [They also have the Right and Power to try and hang
traitors; Publius]
123. Methods of representative government. — Constitutional
government may be set up under either a written or an unwritten
Constitution.
An unwritten constitution. — An unwritten constitution consists
largely of customs, precedents, conditions, and understandings, and is
 Page 79 of 95

constantly changing; any party in power may enact legislation materially

affecting the methods of government and the political rights of citizens.
A written constitution.— In the United States the Rights of the
[White] People are fully protected and the functions of government strictly
defined in a written document — the Constitution. It is called a "rigid
Constitution" because the legislative power has no authority to change it.
It is subject to amendment only by the authority and action of the people
through their representatives in Congress. [But only when a deviation
from the Truth and the Founders intent is discovered;
Publius]
The Congress, whenever two-thirds of both houses shall deem it
necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the
application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states, shall call
a convention for proposing amendments, which in either case, shall be
valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified
by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states, or by conventions
in three-fourths thereof, as one or the other mode of ratification may be
proposed by the Congress; provided * * * that no state, without its consent,
shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. — Constitution,
Article V. [Accept where that amendment violates theUnalienable
Rights and or Sovereignty of the White State Citizen; Publius]
Since the adoption of the Constitution our Nation has increased in
population from 3,000,000 to more than 125,000,000 and has developed
from a wilderness to the greatest industrial nation in the world. The
adequacy of our Constitution is evidenced by the adoption of only 19
amendments to modify the principles set forth in the original document.
[now XXVI acts of Treason]
As a wall of protection our written Constitution stands between the
[White] people and those who, through lust for power, or the temporary
passions of the moment, or for any other reason, would trespass upon the
rights of person or property.
 Page 80 of 95

124. Consent of the governed. — The original desire of the colonists

was "only to hare a voice" in the affairs of the Government.
Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed * * *. We have petitioned for Redress in
the most bumble terras: Our repented Petitions have been answered only
by repeated tyranny. — Declaration of Independence.
The situation so developed that the colonists totally dissolved "all
political connection between them and the State of Great Britain," and
established a new form of government based upon the "consent of the
governed." "Consent" in the drafting and approval of the instrument of
government and its subsequent amendment was a new feature.
125. "American Bill of Rights." — When the Constitutional
Convention was drawing to a close several members who opposed the
adoption of the Constitution suggested a number of amendments, which,
they declared, "would make the Constitution acceptable to them."
While the Constitution already contained many provisions for the
protection of the rights of the individual citizen, various States desired that
it contain further written stipulations that would remove every possibility
of doubt and prevent disputes by "leaving no matters to inference,
implication, or construction."
It was contended that the provision of the suggested Bill of Rights
contained "various exceptions not granted * * *. Why declare that things
shall not be done which there is no power to do?"
The tyranny of legislature is a most formidable dread at present, and
will be for many years. That of the Executive will come in its time, but it
will be at a remote period. — Madison.

Subsequently, many of these features were incorporated in the first

10 amendments, adopted in 1791 as supplements to the Constitution, and
are called the "American Bill of Rights."
The first 10 amendments embodied "guaranties and immunities
which are inherited from our English ancestors." — Supreme Court
(1897).
 Page 81 of 95

126. Enumeration of constitutional rights. — Individual rights

formally guarded by original constitutional provisions: No ex-post facto
laws. No bill of attainder. No suspension of privileges of habeas corpus.
Trial by jury and at places where the crimes were committed.
Definition of treason and limiting punishment.
Guaranty of immunity and privileges of all States to the citizens of
each State.
No religious test before admission to public office.
To which the Bill of Rights added:
Right of peaceable assembly and petition to the Government for
redress of grievances.
Freedom of religion, speech, and press.
Right of the people to keep and bear arms — militia.
Quartering of soldiers only as provided by law.
Protection against unreasonable searches.
Right of accused to indictment by grand jury with certain exceptions.
No compulsory testimony against self.
No deprivation of rights without due process of law.
No confiscation of private property for public use without just
compensation.
Right of a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury.
Right to demand information concerning the nature and cause of
accusation.
To be confronted with witnesses against him.
Compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.
Have assistance of counsel for defense.
Right of trial by jury in suits of common law where value and
controversy shall exceed $20.
Protection of verdict of said jury.
No excessive bail required.
No imposition of excessive fines.
No infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.
Rights retained by the people shall not be denied nor disparaged.
 Page 82 of 95

Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor

prohibited by it to the States are reserved to the States or to the people.
[Right to receive gold and silver Coin in payment of Debt; Article I §10 C.
1Publius]
127. Government by representation. — The framers of the
Constitution were opposed to direct government. The remedy sought was
to be found in representative government. Madison declared that the object
to which their efforts wore to be directed was how to prevent a majority
rule and to preserve the spirit and form of popular government. The
representative form of government was their answer.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a
republican form of government. — Constitution, Article IV, Sect. 4
Sovereignty was placed in the hands of the People. No authority was
delegated to any department either of National or State Government except
by the People through the provisions contained in the Constitution.
There could be no question but that by a republican form of
government was intended a government in which not only would the
people's representatives make laws and the agents administer them, but the
people would also directly or indirectly choose the Executive. — Cooley.”
WWII training manual Supra.

It must be stated here that although the preceding manual

comprehends many of the necessary principles or Our Federal Union, it
tends to Error when stating the Principal of the “Amendment” section of
the Constitution and instead, created the presumption that Our Constitution
could, or has been “modified” for the benefit of the People??? This
statement could not be further from the Truth. I will now paraphrase a
quote from the Supreme Court in United Mine Workers v. US 330 U.S.
258 (1947, Footnote 23; where it address the use of common words like
“person, when applied to “The Sovereign”:

"The most general words that can be devised (for example, any
person or persons, bodies politic or corporate) affect not him (the
 Page 83 of 95

sovereign) in the least if they may tend to restrain or diminish any of his
rights or interests."
Dollar Savings Bank v. United States, 19 Wall. 227, 86 U. S. 239 (1873).

The Unalienable Rights and Prerogatives of the Sovereign White

Citizen of the State established at the Revolution of 1776, have been
replaced with COMMERCIAL AND CIVIL CODES, RULES, AND
REGULATIONS, enacted in the years following the CIVIL WAR AND
RECONSTRUCTION 1866 through Present day, that by their enforcement
by the present treasonous administration, has restrained and in fact
eliminated and replaced all the Prerogatives, Sovereignty and State
Citizenship of the White People, and in Their place stand
GOVERNMENT ENACTED CIVIL RIGHTS. CIVIL PENAL
COMMERCIAL AND POLITICAL CODES. Publius
In this present Day the fiat financial monarchy, having no
Constitutional Foundation, through “erroneous” legislation, both state and
united states, has presumed and acquired the Sovereignty over the “White
Citizen and His Exempt Personalty [see Pollock v. Farmers Loan and
Trust 157 U.S. 429,634(1894)]. The Sovereign White People have been
unrecognizably blended into all the other subject classes of people
becoming general “taxpaying resident aliens” subject to the general
commercial jurisdiction of the corporate state and THE corporate united
states. Publius

“Republic” In the United States of America “a State in which the

exercise of the political sovereign power is enforced exclusively by the
Constitutionally qualified Elected representatives of and by the People as
“White Citizens of the State”; but as Elected Trustees, this power is
“Delegated”, not presumed, and is expressly limited to the Principal and
actual Intent of the Founders as meticulously worded by Them in the
limited Articles of the Constitution and not otherwise; See Article X of
Amendment (1791) that states: “The Powers not delegated to the United
 Page 84 of 95

States by the Constitution, nor Prohibited by it to the States are reserved

To the States respectively, or to the People.” Publius

“It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in
their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of
prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to
the prince. Such was MAGNA CARTA, obtained by the barons, sword in
hand, from King John. Such were the subsequent confirmations of that
Charter by succeeding princes. Such was the PETITION OF RIGHT
assented to by Charles I., in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the
Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of
Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of
parliament called the Bill of Rights. [Keep in Mind that all those Claims of
Liberty were demands of the White European People against Their
Sovereign Prince.] It is evident, therefore, that, according to their primitive
signification, they had no application to constitutions professedly founded
upon the Power of the People, and executed by their immediate
representatives and servants. Here, in The United States of America, in
strictness, the White European People surrender nothing; and as They
retain “Everything”, They have no need of particular Reservations. ``We,
The People of the United States, to secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and
our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of
America.'' Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than Volumes of
those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State
bills of Rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics
than in a constitution of government [OR a Dictionary]. But a minute
detail of particular Rights is certainly far less applicable to a Constitution
like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the
general political interests of the Nation, than to a constitution which has
the regulation of every species of personal and private concerns. .....This
Country and this People seem to have been Made for Each Other, and it
appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper
and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest
 Page 85 of 95

ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien
sovereignties.
Similar sentiments have hitherto prevailed among all orders
and denominations of men among us. To all general purposes We have
uniformly been one People each individual Citizen everywhere enjoying
the same national Rights, Privileges, and Protection. As a Nation We have
made Peace and War; as a Nation We have vanquished Our common
enemies; as a Nation We have formed Alliances, and made Treaties, and
entered into various Compacts and Conventions with foreign States.
A Strong sense of the Value and Blessings of Union induced
the People, at a very early period, to institute a Federal Government to
Preserve and Perpetuate it. They formed it almost as soon as They had a
Political existence; nay, at a time when Their habitations were in flames,
when many of Their Citizens were bleeding, and when the progress of
Hostility and Desolation left little room for those Calm and Mature
Inquiries and Reflections which must ever precede the Formation of a
Wise and well-balanced Government for a Free [White] People. It is not to
be wondered at, that a government instituted in times so inauspicious,
should on experiment be found greatly deficient and inadequate to the
purpose it was intended to answer.
This intelligent People perceived and regretted these defects.
Still continuing no less attached to union than enamored of Liberty, They
observed the danger which immediately threatened the former and more
remotely the latter; and being persuaded that ample Security for Both
could only be found in a National Government more wisely Framed, They
as with one Voice, convened the late Convention at Philadelphia, to take
that important Subject under consideration.
This convention composed of Men who Possessed the
confidence of the People, and many of whom had become highly
distinguished by Their Patriotism, Virtue and Wisdom, in times which
tried the Minds and Hearts of Men, undertook the arduous Task. In the
mild season of Peace, with Minds unoccupied by other subjects, They
passed many months in cool, uninterrupted, and daily Consultation; and
 Page 86 of 95

finally, without having been awed by Power, or Influenced by any

Passions except Love for Their Country, They presented and
recommended to the [White] People the plan produced by Their joint and
very unanimous Councils. Publius No. 3 for “The Constitution of the
United States of America”.

“Principal”, in a general sense, the cause, source or origin of

anything; a general truth; human nature; foundation such as cause and
effect; motion or action; leading; more important; chief; a common law; of
royal blood; of sovereignty; “In the United States of America: “A White
Citizen of the State” Domiciled of His Demesne/Manor/Castle while in the
exercise of His/Her Private Unalienable Rights, is the Principal. Publius

Government Property

When the government, either State or Federal or National claims

property, Public or Private, real or otherwise, foreign or Domestic, the first
Principal of Our Federal System, created and vested by the Power of the
White State Citizen through His Trust/Constitution, comes into effect.
Their trustees must first cite the specific Article, Section and or Clause of
its charter, the Original Constitution, vesting it or them with the specific
power and the specific authority to assume jurisdiction over it and acquire
it and so state the specific Purpose for its acquisition. This is called
“Disclosure” that is the mandatory exposure upon the trustees and all their
limited acts to be maintained in clear and unencumbered public view. All
acts of the government employees, who volunteer to be the servants of the
White People, must remain transparent and visible to its ‘Master
Employers’, The White Male Citizens of the State. This open disclosure is
not voluntary but Mandatory. Publius

It was stated in Mugler v. Kansas 123 U.S.623 (1887) that:

 Page 87 of 95

“There are, of necessity, limits beyond which legislation cannot

rightfully go. While every possible presumption is to be indulged in favor
of the validity of a statute, (Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 718 ,) the courts
must obey the constitution rather than the law-making department of
government, and must, upon their own responsibility, determine
whether, in any particular case, these limits have been passed. 'To
what purpose,' it was said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137, 167, 'are
powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to
writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be
restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and
unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the
persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts
allowed are of equal obligation.' The courts are not bound by mere forms,
nor are they to be misled by mere pretenses. They are at liberty, indeed,
are under a solemn duty, to look at the substance of things, whenever
they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended
the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been
enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety,
has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable
invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the
courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the constitution. Mugler
@ p. 661.

I must here give a short synopsis on the Word “Duty”, and its
relationship to an “Unalienable Right” of the “White Posterity”: as I have
previously stated, there is no verbiage, or definitions written or otherwise,
in any case law, or legislation on the books in our Federal or State
Libraries that specifically vests the power of Private Sovereignty or
Private Prerogatives in any class or people other than the “White People”.
All the CIVIL CODES, AND CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS, so stated from 1866
to present, acts, or vest only civil right. And, in order that the Sovereignty
and Prerogatives’ shall be restored, we must trace their existence to a point
of beginning and identify that specific race that they were secured to. As
 Page 88 of 95

of this date in time, the only class ever endowed with Sovereignty, Private
Unalienable Prerogative Rights are the White People in the Several States
of this Federal Union (1776). Publius

It therefore follows that it was, and still is the solemn “Duty” of all
Our Trustees to protect and defend the Posterity from any invasion,
foreign or domestic, against Our “State Citizenship”, Our Demesne Land
and Allodial Titles, Our Gold and Silver Coin, Our Republican Form of
Government, and Our Writ of Error; Publius

“Duty”: As we had occasion to observe in California v. San Pablo &

T. R. Co. 149 U.S. 308, 314, 37 S. L. ed. 747, 749, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 876,
'the duty of this court, as of every judicial tribunal, is limited to
determining rights of [179 U.S. 405, 409] persons or of property, which
are actually controverted in the particular case before it. When, in
determining such rights, it becomes Necessary to give an opinion upon a
question of law, that opinion may have weight as a precedent for future
decisions. But the court is not empowered to decide moot questions or
abstract propositions, or to declare, for the government of future cases,
principles or rules of law which cannot affect the result as to the thing in
issue in the case before it. No stipulation of parties, or counsel, whether in
the case before the court, or in any other case, can enlarge the power or
affect the duty of the court in this regard. 'TYLER v. JUDGES OF THE COURT OF
REGISTRATION, 179 U.S. 405,409 (1900)

“Writ of Error”: "A writ of Error is a writ of Right which is

grantable ex debito justitiæ; . . . It is the constitutional right of every
citizen to have his case reviewed in one form or another by a court of
error:. . A suit at law can be reviewed only on writ of error; . .; Bouvier's
Law Dictionary, (1914) p. 210. For reference, it was the direct result of the
CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS (1866) that unleashed a hoard of miss guided black
people to begin their arduous task of assimilating themselves into a
sovereignty that did not recognize them. And by their plight began to
 Page 89 of 95

move their court actions via the “Writ of Error”. Because this Writ was
mandatory upon the Supreme Court, it was inundated beyond control with
a number of Writs of Error beyond its capacity to hear. This prompted the
legislature to intervene and vest the Supreme Court with power to
determine whether the case before it qualified in all respects under the
principal of a Writ of Error. But instead of the court distinguishing those
cases of civil rights and distinguishing them from Unalienable Rights and
Allodial Titles under the American Common Law, the miss guided Court
of Error simply decided to ignore this Writ of Error, and miss quote the act
of Congress that did not abolish the Writ of Error but instructed that court
to distinguish between Error and Appeal/Certiorari.

Wherefore, when any attack upon the Security of the Rights and
Titles vested in the Sovereign White People Citizens of the State and
Secured by the Constitution are involved, it is the Duty of the Legislature,
the Executive and the Courts to protect and defend the Unalienable Rights
of the White Citizen; and, the Writ of Error which are all synonymous
terms; accept that the “Writ of Error, Like the Allodial Titles to Land, Like
the Private Unalienable Prerogative Rights of Life, Liberty and Private
Property, and last but not least the “White Citizen of the State” have all
been erroneously and Treasonously eliminated from Our Republican
Federal System by acts of the Legislatures purporting to be Lawful, but in
fact and Principal have all but destroyed the People, Their Rights, their
Sovereign Status, and The Posterity, from which I now Stand. Publius

“Title” Exclusive Possession; (Noah 1828) Parallel to Right,

Unalienable and Prerogative: In the United States of America, the highest
human Title is a “Citizen of the State” 2 Dall @455; followed by the
Union of Citizens which is the State; followed by the highest Title to Land
within the State which is “Allodial” Demesne/Demain Manor/Castle, all of
which are ‘Secured’ by God and the “Constitution of the United States of
America (1788)”; as confirmed in Miranda vs. Az 384 U.S. @ 491
(1965).
 Page 90 of 95

By this Principals of Our Government, all Our Trustees under Oath,

State and Federal, Elected or appointed, and their Agents, owe their
political existence to the Will of the White European State Citizens; and
by this fact of Law, there is no Real Property that is exclusive to these
Trustees accept for the express purpose of its use to enforce Our American
Common Law throughout the several States, and to be an Example of
Truth to the World; But, when in the course of human events it becomes
necessary for this White European People to throw off the CHAINS OF
OPPRESSION, and neutralize the many Frauds and acts of Treason
committed against them and Their Sovereignty; the trustees of Their
Government will be charged and held accountable; and, because the
People are the final Repository of all the Power, all the Land, and all its
Fruits, and when this People decide that this government has exceeded its
power and authority, and conspired to exterminate Them as the People,
They are at Will, and have a Duty to The Posterity, by and under the God
given Grant of Sovereignty, been vested with the power to exterminate
those Insidious, Treasonous individuals, and there hold on the Land they
operate from.

In Repetition:

“Allodial” Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service;

held independent of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal. Blackstone.
Freehold Estate; land which is the absolute property of the owner; real
estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent,
service, or acknowledgment to a superior. In the United States of
America, Most Lands are Allodial. Noah (1828). In the United States of
America the Right to hold this Allodial Title to the Private Land in one of
the Several Federal States of the American Union is the Prerogative of the
WhitePeople of the United States of America as a qualified “Citizen of
the State of His or Her Demesne Domicile”, which then is equal to the
 Page 91 of 95

“Crown Land” in Europe as Demesne or Demain. But does not apply to

any land in use by Our Government. Publius

So, even the terms of, a “Land Patent” does not apply to
GOVERNMENT held land: THIS feudal PHRASE came here with the
Founders, but like the term ”tenants in fee simple” is a creature of the
Crown of England, used to identify the highest land title issued by the
Crown to one of his subjects. In the United States of America, the
executive authority of both State and Federal Government, have presumed
to be the fountain from which this highest feudal title to land is issued.
They call this title a “Land Patent”. A Land Patent is, like a subject,
a creature of a feudal system such as England, where the king is the
possessor of all the Land in Allodium, and has the ultimate prerogative to
issue this Land Patent to a subject of his own choosing, or to void said
Patent at his own prerogative. Therefore a Land Patent in The United
States is nothing more than a sub title that the government has issued
under many different treaties or claims to others having no sovereign
Prerogatives to the Allodial Title OF Our “Crown Land”.

But in the United States of America, even this once acquired Land
Patent has been hidden and replaced with things like “DEED” or “TRUST
DEED”; or, “TAX DEED”, or “RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE
PROPERTY”, and subject to a “RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX
ASSESSOR”; among others.

In repetition:

Herein We find the second greatest dilemma of Our Time!!! Just

what should the title to the Land assigned under Articles I and IV of the
Constitution to the Federal Governments look Like, and what “Words” in
Law, properly describe It?????
 Page 92 of 95

Because the Constitution is, by its Principal and Application, a

“Trust”; Hamilton No. 65; which sole purpose is to Secure the Unalienable
Rights to the White People and Their Posterity, it then follows that the
Peoples Elected agents under that Trust are, “Trustees”, [Madison,
Federalist No. 46] then and all the Land held in Trust or assigned from that
Trust under authority of the White People to the agencies for express
purposes under the Trust, are, “Trust Land”; So,

How about “Trust Land of the White Citizens of the several

States”!!!

And subject to Their Sovereign Jurisdiction.

Madison continued; “The federal and State governments are in fact

but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different
powers, and designed for different purposes. The adversaries of the
Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their
reasoning’s on this subject; and to have viewed these different
establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled
by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each
other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error. They must be
told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found,
resides in the people alone, and that it will not depend merely on the
comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether
either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at
the expense of the other. Truth, no less than decency, requires that the
event in every case should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and
sanction of their common constituents. Many considerations, besides those
suggested on a former occasion, seem to place it beyond doubt that the
first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the governments
of their respective States.”
 Page 93 of 95

Treason…. I now ask these 7 questions in order for you, as a

“Trustee”, to determine whether the Sovereignty that I was Secured by the
Constitution at My Birth, is still in full force and effect??? And if My
Sovereignty is not, whether someone has and still is committing Treason
against My Sovereignty as one of the Posterity, and all the White People
and those of you non whites who claim equal status!!!!!!

What would the sheriff or police do in California, if they saw

My Private Automobile sitting or moving on public property without
a MOTOR VEHICLE license, MOTOR VEHICLE registration or
MOTOR VEHICLE insurance???
What would a sheriff or police in California do if he/she saw
Me carrying an unconcealed fire arm/weapon on Public Property???
What would the IRS or FTB do if I didn’t pay an assessed tax
on money they discovered I received for Completion of an Article I
§10 private contract???
What would the courts do when a foreign private banc
foreclosed on My Private Property for not making mortgage
payments with unconstitutional money???
What would Homelandsecurity do if I tried to pass the airport
check point with un declared 10k frn’s or that amount in US gold and
silver Coins or both???
What would the CA FTB tax authority do if I didn’t pay a
“residential property tax” on my Private Demain Manor/Domicile???
What would the Governor/Secretary of the STATE OF
CLIFORNIA do if I demanded the issuance of a Lawful
Identification for My “State Citizenship”; “Exempt Plates” and
“Manufactures Certificate of Origin” for My all My Private
Conveyance’s; A Certificate of Allodial Title and Exemption from
Property Tax to My Private Real Property (Demain
Manor/Domicile/Castle)???
 Page 94 of 95

I WOULD, most assuredly BE BRANDED AS A PATRIOT TYPE,

RADICAL EXTREEMEST, ANARCHEST, TAX PROTESTOR, AND
WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE, BUT: it is immanently certain that those
of YOU who took An Article VI Oath to protect and defend My
Constitution who intentionally legislate, execute and judge to deny My
Sovereignty My Unalienable Rights and steel My Private Property Secured
by that Constitution, are, in the Eyes of God and your Creators, “We The
People”, Guilty of “Treason”!!!

In order to finalize a principal discounted by bankers, tyrants,

dictators, monarchists, and other solists of the human race, I, like the other
members of this American Federal Union, was, like the Founding
Founders, born a “Federalist”, as this term was understood and
emplemented by Them. And as such, I was also endowed by God with
certain Unalienable Rights secured by Their Revolt. And by this fact in
Our History, I became a member of a Sovereign Class of White State
Citizens with the Right of inheritance to all the Rights, Prerogatives
Exemptions, both Real and Personal Private Property, My Gold and Silver
Coin, and My “Republican Form of Government. In place of these Royal
Prerogatives, the Trustees and those of you who conspire with them, have
instead

Replaced, no, Stolen My Rightful Inheritance of Gold and

Silver Coin, and in its place have printed enough nonredeemable fiat
banc paper to destroy the entire world economy;
Denied and hidden My Prerogative Right to a non taxable
Demesne Castle, and replaced it with a banc deed taxable residence;
Denied Me My Unalienable Rights to Travel in My Exempt
Carriage AND replaced it with a STATE owned LICENSABLE,
TAXABLE, INSURABLE COMMERCIAL MOTORVEHICLE;
 Page 95 of 95

Replaced My Republican Form of Government with a

bastardized form of DEMOCRACY/AUTOCRACY;
And Exterminated My American Common Law Rights in My
Courts;
And Exterminated My Sovereignty and in its place you feed me
nothing but government commercial regulations;

All these and more are ongoing Acts of “Treason” against the White
People of the United States of America

Let it be said, as before, when the People fail to learn from the
Mistakes of Their Past, They, or Their Posterity are “Doomed” to repeat it.

The Beginning; Publius