Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
March 2011
PREFACE
The Aerodrome Inspectors Hand book has been prepared for use and
guidance of DGCA Aerodrome Inspectors in the performance of their duties with
respect to the surveillance inspections of aerodromes in India. Primarily it is a
handbook of “What”, “Why”, and “How”, tailor made for now and capable of
evolution. It will be a primary reference document for all inspectors in Directorate
of Aerodrome Standards. It covers the regulatory objectives of the DOAS.
E K Bharat Bhushan
Director General of Civil Aviation
i
Record of Revisions
ii
Aerodrome Inspectors Handbook
Content page
1. Definitions 1
2. Introduction 5
3. Purpose of the Handbook 8
4. Scope and structure of the handbook 8
5. Regulatory Objectives 8
6. Safety Regulatory Policy Statement 9
7. Inspectors’ Responsibilities and Accountabilities 10
8. Regulation activity/Safety Oversight with modified tools 12
9. Appendices (1 to 22) 17-172
9.1 Appendix 1 Revised Inspection Checklist 17-43
iii
9.10 Appendix 10 Inspection Notification Letter – Draft 118-120
iv
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Definitions
Basic (B): An aerodrome with one runway, having one taxiway to one apron
area.
Simple (S): An aerodrome with one runway, having more than one taxiway to
one or more apron areas.
Complex (C): An aerodrome with more than one runway, having many
taxiways to one or more apron areas.
Compliance
The meeting of Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), whether they are the
equivalent of ICAO Standards (shall) or Recommended Practices (should).
Compliance Checklist
Hazard
Hazard Log
A document containing:
a description of each hazard, not only from change scenarios, but also
day-to-day activity;
its consequences;
the assessed likelihood and severity of the safety risks of the
consequences; and required safety risk controls, most usually mitigation
measures.
1
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
The hazard log will form part of the database on aircraft safety related
occurrences, incidents and accidents, and therefore part of the data used to
pro-actively formulate safety interventions (examples of hazard logs can be
found in the appendices to Chapter 5 of ICAO Doc 9859). The hazard log
should be updated as new hazards are identified and proposals for further
safety risk controls (i.e. further mitigation measures) are introduced.
Inspection
Level of Safety
Safety Audit
Like inspection, audit is also a specific mechanism, but one that looks deeper
at processes for how something is used, or how a document meets a
requirement, rather than just a physical inspection.
Safety indicators are the parameters that characterise and/or typify the level
of safety of a system; safety indicator value is the quantification of a safety
indicator and safety targets are the concrete objectives of the level of safety.
Safety review
Severity
Tolerability
The concept of tolerating a level of risk that is higher than the licensee’s
acceptable threshold, on the basis that:
There has been a rigorous assessment of the risk, and it has been
signed off by the Accountable Executive.
The licensee can demonstrate that all mitigation measures have been
identified and implemented in order to reduce the safety risk level to
ALARP, at a cost that is reasonable and proportionate to the safety
risk.
That the subject safety risk level and the threshold levels of what is
acceptable and not acceptable are kept constantly under review by the
licensee.
3
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Light: Not greater than 15 movements per runway or typically less than 20
total aerodrome movements.
Visibility Condition
One of three visibilities (four if operations in visibility insufficient for the pilot to
taxi by visual guidance only, normally taken as an RVR of 75metres or less)
under which the aerodrome operator plans to maintain operations; see ICAO
Doc 9476, SMGCS Manual and Doc 9830, Advanced SMGCS Manual for the
definitions of these visibilities.
4
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Introduction
It is important to distinguish the responsibilities and roles that the regulator and
the service providers have in the area of operational safety. Day-to-day
management of operational safety and risks to safety is the responsibility of the
providers of the aviation services.
The State safety regulator has the responsibility for regulatory functions,
including “safety oversight”. ICAO has identified and defined the following critical
elements (CE) of a State’s safety oversight system:
5
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
CE-3. State civil aviation system and safety oversight functions. The
establishment of a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and/or other relevant
authorities or government agencies, headed by a Chief Executive
Officer, supported by the appropriate and adequate technical and non-
technical staff and provided with adequate financial resources. The CAA
must have stated safety regulatory functions, objectives and safety
policies.
6
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
7
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
It is these (eight) critical elements that ICAO uses as an audit metric when
conducting its Safety Oversight Audit, including the formulation of its findings and
recommendations. The development of this handbook and the DGCA plan to
recruit more inspectors is in response to one of the findings of ICAO’s audit of
India.
To meet the needs outlined in the introduction, but also to address future
development needs. In essence, it is a handbook of “what”, “why” and “how’;
tailor made for now, and capable of evolution.
After the sections on regulatory objectives, the DOAS safety policy statement
and inspectors responsibilities, there is a summary of current tools and
mechanisms to meet the objectives and policies.
Regulatory Objectives
To:
1. Assess airport service providers’ adherence to State guidance, and
compliance with national requirements.
This is being achieved to the extent possible within the limitations of existing
tools by:
3. Enforcement functions.
c. provide:
i. technical guidance within its scope of activity to internal staff
and to those it regulates; and
ii. a legislative framework that is fit-for-purpose in its scope,
format and content.
1
It is not possible for the regulator or the service providers to achieve this objective on their own, and
collaborating while maintaining regulatory distance should also build trust and encourage licensees to
regard the DGCA as a contributor to safety.
2
See Appendix 1 for Inspector experience, qualification and personal attribute profile.
10
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Inspectors’ authorities
3
An issue of appropriate roles and effective use of DGCA resource.
11
Rev.4, 13.11.2018
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
The following are the protocols to follow for all regulatory inspections.
Inspection/Audit protocols:
12
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
For above inspections, it would normally be the case for all the areas to be
covered. For the annual surveillance the inspection areas should be
focused in the areas that:
are at the time presenting the greatest hazards to safety, or that are
expected to present such hazards during the following year;
have been the subject of new or revised requirements;
are the subject of corrective action; and
may need previous conclusions or evaluations to be re-validated
For the renewal inspection the expectation would be for all areas to be
covered, but not necessarily to the same degree, and with the emphasis
on the core areas and those not covered in the interim annual inspection.
Finally for a new site the checklist can be used to focus on areas that give
an overall picture of the feasibility for the site to be suitable for an airport.
a. Pre-inspection preparation:-
i. Determine the inspection team and appoint a team leader.
ii. Tailor the inspection checklist for the team make-up and the
selected areas of inspection.
iii. Audits of documents, including:
AM, including AEP and SMS.
AIP entries, including exemptions and “Hot Spot” chart.
13
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
14
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
15
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
d. Post-inspection briefing:-
i. the observations and findings, together with supporting
evidence; and
ii. expectations by DGCA of action by the applicant or licensee;
iii. Any other relevant issue
e. Enforcement and Follow-up: -
i. Identify non-compliances with Rules or CARs, and request
(in the demand sense), and in accordance with the
procedures in the Enforcement Manual, a corrective action
plan, to be sent by the aerodrome operator.
ii. For a Licensee that does not accept i) above continued Non-
compliances with the Rules or CARs may attract action in
the form of warning, operational restrictions or licence
suspension. If action under the Enforcement Manual
provisions is initiated the Licensee will be given the
opportunity of a hearing, unless there is an immediate safety
concern or threat to safety, in which case inspectors should
contact the Director of Aerodrome Standards.
iii. Dependent on the outcome of the hearing action deemed
appropriate will be taken.
16
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
Appendix1
4
Modified from the definitions in the DGCA Enforcement Circular 1/2009 to address the issue of the licensee challenging and wanting an objective assessment.
17
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
NAME OF AERODROME:
TRAFFIC
DENSITY
DECLARED TRAFFIC DENSITY, VISIBILITY
VISIBILITY
CONDITION AND AERODROME LAYOUT –
CONDITION
(Refer to ICAO Docs 9476, SMGCS and
9830, Advanced SMGCS) AERODROME
LAYOUT
18
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
REF N
NO. ITEMS STANDARDS ANN. 14 C C N/A COMMENTS
1. 3.1 Runways RWY surfaces W/O irregularities 3.1.22
RWY, friction characteristics on wet 3.1.23
2.
pavement
3. 3.2 Runway No standard
4. Shoulders
3.3 Runway
5.
Turn Application for code D, E or F 3.3.1
6. Pads Runway turn pad - design 3.3.6
7. Surface of RWY turn pads 3.3.10
3.4 Runway General – RWY and stop way included
8. Strips in 3.4.1
runway strip
9. Length of rwy strip 3.4.2
10. Width of rwy strip 3.4.3
11. Objects on rwy strip 3.4.7
12. Junction rwy and other surfaces 3.4.10
General – mandatory depending on
3.5 Runway End runway 3.5.1
13.
Safety Area
(RESA) code
14. Dimensions, length 3.5.2
15. Dimensions, width 3.5.4
16. 3.6 Clearways No standard
3.7 Stop ways Width 3.7.1
17.
3.8 Radio
18.
Altimeter No standard
19. Operating Area
19
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
intermediate
26.
holding Road-holding position - rwy 3.12.5
27. positions, road- Location of above signs 3.12.6
28. holding positions RWY holding position & ILS protection 3.12.9
29. 3.13 Apron No standard
3.14 Isolated Identification of an isolated aircraft
30. aircraft parking 3.14.1
parking position position
3.15 De-icing No standard
31.
facilities
32. 4.1 Obstacle Conical surface, description GSR 751
33. Limitation Surfaces Conical surface, characteristics GSR 751
34. Conical surface, slopes GSR 751
35. Inner horizontal Description GSR 751
36. surface Characteristics GSR 751
37. Height, method of measurement GSR 751
38. Approach surface Description GSR 751
39. Characteristics GSR 751
40. Elevation of inner edge GSR 751
41. Slope of approach surface GSR 751
42. Inner approach Description GSR 751
43. surface Characteristics GSR 751
20
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
21
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
22
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
23
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
24
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
25
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
26
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
27
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
28
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
29
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
30
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
31
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
32
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
33
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
34
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
35
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
36
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
37
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
38
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
39
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
40
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
Equipment’’.
519.
9.3 Disabled
520. aircraft No standard
removal
521. 9.4 Wildlife strike Risk evaluation 9.4.1
522. hazard reduction Bird strike to be reported to ICAO 9.4.2
523. Mitigation measures 9.4.3
524. Elimination of garbage disposal site 9.4.4
9.5 Apron Apron management service shall be 9.5.3
525. Management provided with radiotelephony
Service communication facilities
526. Restriction for low-visibility procedure 9.5.4
527. Priority to emergency vehicles 9.5.5
528. Various priorities on apron 9.5.6
529. Visual monitoring of aircraft stand 9.5.7
530. 9.6 Ground Availability of fire extinguishers 9.6.1
531. servicing of aircraft Refuelling with passengers on board. 9.6.2
532. 9.7 Airport vehicle Authorization to drive airside 9.7.1
533. operations Compliance with directives, signs etc. 9.7.2
Compliance with mandatory 9.7.3
534.
instructions conveyed by light
535. Training for drivers 9.7.4
536. Two-way communication means 9.7.5
537. 9.8 Surface Application 9.8.1
movement
guidance Switching of stop bars and twy centre 9.8.6
538.
and control
systems line lights
539. 9.9 Siting of No objects on rwy strip, RESA etc. 9.9.1
equipment and If objects on strip, RESA, or stop way 9.9.2
540.
installations on = frangible
541. operational area Above applies as of 01 Jan 2010 9.9.3
41
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
42
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
43
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
Appendix 2
NAME OF AERODROME :
DATE OF INSPECTION :
A RUNWAY : 3.1
44
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
RUTTING):
A.3 PROCESS TO NOTIFY FLIGHT CAR para 2.9.5
CREW, A DESCRIPTION OF THE
RUNWAY SURFACE
CONDITIONS USING THE
FOLLOWING TERMS: DAMP,
WET AND STANDING WATER.
A.4 PROCESS TO NOTIFY CAR para 2.9.6
INFORMATION THAT A
RUNWAY OR PORTION
THEREOF MAY BE SLIPPERY
WHEN WET TO AIS? HAS THIS
PROCESS BEEN INCLUDED IN
AERODROME MANUAL?
A.5 SURFACE FRICTION/RUBBER 5.1.23,Doc 9137
DEPOSIT/ DATE OF LAST
pt-8- chapter 7
FRICTION TEST WITH
COEFFICIENT VALUE:
A.6 RUNWAY SLOPES: 3.1.12
45
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
B APRON : 3.13
46
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
10.6.1.1
C OPERATIONAL AREA :
47
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
D TAXIWAYS : 3.9
48
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
49
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
E ARFF : 9
50
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
F AERODROME INFORMATION
(AD 2) :
F.1 DATE OF PUBLICATION : Doc 9137 pt-8-
Chapter 2
51
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
G AERODROME OPERATIONS :
52
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
53
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
54
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
J ATC :
55
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
K COMMUNICATION/NAVIGATION
FACILITIES :
K.1 NAV FACILITIES Sec 4,Series -X,
(NDB/DVOR/MSSR/ILS)
part 1
K.2 SERVICEABILITY / RELIABILITY Sec 4,Series -X,
STATUS OF NAVIGATIONAL
part 1
AIDS:
K.3 SERVICEABILITY / RELIABILITY Sec 4,Series -X,
STATUS OF AIR GROUND
part 1
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES (
VHF,HF ETC ), INTER UNIT
COMMUNICATION :
56
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
L METEOROLOGY :
M PASSENGER FACILITATION :
57
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
N LICENSING CONDITIONS:
58
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
REMARKS :
LIST OF OBSERVATION :
59
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
Appendix 3
Inspection Area:
References from Inspection Example audit style questions Notable points
Checklist.
A.1 Aerodrome information
and data
I How do you ensure that the aeronautical information that you
provide for promulgation in the AIP and elsewhere meets the
required accuracies?
A.2 Procedures
I a. When was the last time such information was revised?
b. Did it meet the accuracy requirements?
Ii a. Where are the procedures for allowing appropriate access
airside?
b. How do you measure the procedure for effectiveness in
controlling access?
Iii a. How do you measure runway precipitation on your runways?
b. What do you do if there is more than 25% of the runway
covered with water over 3mm in depth?
c. What do you do if instead of 25% it is 50% coverage?
d. When was the last time you measured runway precipitation
and what were the results?
e. What did you do with the results? Did that follow an SOP?
f. With the monsoon season imminent what are your procedures
for runway care and status promulgation
g. What was the date for the last scheduled check on the PAPIs?
h. Was that undertaken?
i. If so, what were the results?
60
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
Show me please.
iv a. Is this maintenance being implemented to a programme?
b. If not, why not?
c. If yes, is the programme being met?
d. When was the last and the next scheduled activity?
v a. How and Where is this procedure spelt out?
b. How is it coordinated with users and other stakeholders?
vi a. When was the last survey undertaken?
b. Did it show any changed or additional obstructions in the Type
B chart area that penetrated the performance surface?
c. If so, when was the Chart revised?
d. What does the organisation do if there is a penetration of the
obstacle control surfaces?
e. Can you show me the procedure please?
vii a. How effective is/was the procedure during the most recent
period of low visibility conditions?
b. How do you measure that effectiveness?
viii a. What mechanism do you use to ensure that there is adequate
scope and timeliness for coordinating activity with the ATS
provider?
b. Please show me the last time it was applied, and what was the
outcome?
iv a. What is the greatest safety concern on the apron?
b. How are you trying to resolve that by Apron Management and
apron operating procedures?
c. How effective is it?
d. Are the outcomes consistent with the agreed safety targets?
x a. What organisation has the responsibility for overall control of
vehicles on the apron?
61
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
62
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
63
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
64
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
65
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
vi How have you determined that your RESAs are sufficient in size?
vii How do you ensure that the ILS critical and sensitive areas are
not infringed?
viii a. Do the runways meet the orientation requirements of the CAR?
b. Can you provide evidence of that?
C Taxiways and
Interfaces
i a. What is the taxiway inspection regime?
b. What was the last maintenance action undertaken on the
taxiways?
c. What preventative maintenance do you undertake?
ii a. Do you have any taxiway movements by aircraft of a higher
Code than designed for?
b. If so, have you undertaken an assessment of the risks?
iii a. Are the taxiway separation standards compatible with the
aircraft codes using the runway?
b. If not, what risk control measures do you have in place?
iv How do you stabilise the surface of the strips, in order to minimise
the risk of engine ingestion damage?
v a. If any of the taxiway slopes are non-compliant, are they
considered to be a hazard?
b. How did you make this judgement?
vi a. Do you have any taxiways that have standing water on the
surfaces during heavy or prolonged rainfall?
b. If so, has the drainage been assessed for adequacy?
vii a. Have you had any occurrences reported, verbally or in writing,
involving the Apron to Runway route designations?
b. If so, what action is being taken
viii Does your “Hot Spot” chart reflect any issue raised in vii above?
66
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
D Apron Areas
i a. What is the apron surface inspection regime?
b. What was the last maintenance action undertaken on the
apron?
c. What preventative maintenance do you undertake?
ii a. Is the presence of FOD on the apron getting better or worse?
b. How do you know?
iii a. When were the apron markings last repainted?
b. Are they adequate at present?
c. Do you have plans to repaint the markings?
iv Does the apron lighting create any distraction to ATC or pilots on
the manoeuvring area?
v a. Have you had any occurrences reported, verbally or in writing,
involving these equipments?
b. If so, what action is being taken
vi a. Does the airport have a problem with equipment being parked
outside the designated areas?
b. If yes, what action is being taken?
c. If no, can we go to the apron areas now please?
vii a. Are there mandatory or information signs associated with the
apron area of at the taxiway/apron interface?
b. If no, should there be?
c. If yes, are they fully compliant?
viii a. Are the stand clearances compliant?
b. Are the clearances being adhered to?
c. How have you determined that?
ix a. Which organisation has the overall coordination role on the
apron?
b. How is that coordination applied in order that close liaison is
achieved between ATS, the airlines and the airport?
67
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
68
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
69
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
70
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
H Other Operational
Areas/Features
i a. How secure is the boundary wall/fence?
b. Can you give evidence of this?
ii How are the signals kept up-to-date with the current operating
mode?
iii a. What are the clearances from operational areas and
visual/electronic navigation aids?
b. How is fitness for purpose determined?
iv Has this been tested and found effective?
I Wildlife Management
i How would you detect a change in bird flight paths on the airport?
ii How do you measure the effectiveness of methods used to control
and manage wildlife hazards?
iii a. How do you know if you have enough manpower and other
resources for wildlife management?
b. If using a contractor, have you audited their procedures,
manpower and resource provision, and verified effectiveness of
controls
J Rescue and Fire-
Fighting
i Does the RFF category meet the requirement for the class of
aircraft using the airport, in terms of fuselage length and
movement numbers?
ii a. How many vehicles are on-line today?
b. Is that in compliance?
iii a. How do you ensure that the agents remain effective as
intended?
b. Where are they stored, and how do you ensure that that storage
71
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
facility is acceptable?
iv Have the SOPs been tested in terms of the application of Human
Factors principles?
v a. Do you have full watch cover?
b. Can you give evidence of that please?
vi a. Does the training of the officers match the tasks they are
scheduled for today?
b. Can you show me evidence of that by training records please?
vii a. Are all of the firefighters trained and certificated to international
standards in radio telephony>
b. If not, when will they be?
c. If yes, please show me the training and certification records
viii What is the system for meeting the water requirement for
extinguishing fires, both for initial and sustained response?
ix a. Show me the plan of the airside water hydrants please
b. When was (a hydrant selected by the inspector) last tested?
During the airside inspection ask for that one to be opened,
subject to an operational hazard assessment by the inspector.
x Please show me the grid map/chart
a. When was it last updated?
b. Does it still accurately reflect the airside infrastructure and
layout?
c. Are all of the crash gates and RVPs correctly shown?
xi a. Is the access to all of the crash gates kept clear?
b. Are the locks regularly checked, and what is the
policy/procedure on access by the outside services?
xii a. When was the last test of response times carried out, and what
was the result.
b. If the required time was not met what action is being taken?
xiii a. To what schedule programme are the fire vehicles maintained?
72
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
73
Inspectors Handbook March/ 2011
74
Inspectors Handbook March 2011
Appendix 4
1. Night Inspection
Purpose:
a. Viewing the overall airside facility from the ATC visual control room
can be a very effective way of seeing the system as a whole and
system interfaces. A visit there before a field inspection may
indicate areas to be inspected, such as a new W.I.P area that does
not look secure from an incursion by an aircraft. A visit after a field
inspection may confirm a non-compliance finding as being
significant, or not. It is also an opportunity to seek another
view/opinion on adequacy.
c. Look for:
i. “black holes” that may present a hazard in the context of
runway incursion outcomes; or
75
Inspectors Handbook March 2011
Conclusions:
Findings from this area of inspection maybe more about the effectiveness
of the facility, rather than mere compliance.
Purpose:
a. More obvious audit style questions that arise from the above others
may need to be formulated to test any statements or assertions
given about “fitness for purpose”. Often these are not immediately
obvious until the audit has started. For example, on finding out that
some of the firefighters are on standby at home or undertaking
other secondary tasks, questions about response capability arise
b. Think whole system and not just measurable or countable
elements.
c. Be prepared to ask the “what if” questions, for example, what if the
hand held radio of a key player in the communication/coordination
plan fails during an emergency situation?
76
Inspectors Handbook March 2011
Conclusions:
The inspector has to be satisfied about the match between the provision of
staff and “things” and the demands that may be placed on the system
provision, during normal operations as well as abnormal operations. In
particular, with the prevailing traffic density and mix, as well as airport
environment, including “visibility condition”.
Purpose:
Conclusions:
4. Wildlife Management
Purpose:
77
Inspectors Handbook March 2011
Conclusions:
5. SMGCS
Purpose:
5
For more on this see ICAO Doc 9859, Edition 2 Safety Management Manual – Chapter 2.6
78
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
a. Does the system meet the guidance in the ICAO SMGCS Manuals for:
i. Equipment – ground lighting and signage (bear in mind the need for coordination with ATM in this
area).
ii. Other guidance provision – markings.
iii. Procedures.
b. Specialist driver and operative training for those permitted airside during LVO.
c. Specialist equipment for vehicles permitted to operate on the movement area during LVO.
Conclusions:
The inspector needs to have planned the inspection of this area with attention to all the elements of the system
including procedures and operative training, as well as physical provision.
Purpose:
Apron management service is a service provided to regulate the activities and the movement of aircraft and
vehicles on an apron. Depending upon volume of traffic and operating conditions, an appropriate apron
management service is provided by an ATS unit, aerodrome operating authority or by a cooperative combination
of these.
When the aerodrome control tower partially participate in the apron management service, inspector is obligated to
see that procedures are established and followed to facilitate the orderly transition of functions between the apron
management unit and the aerodrome control tower.
79
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Conclusions:
The inspector needs to have planned the inspection of this area with attention to all the elements of the system
including responsibilities, operating procedures, reporting and communication and training as well as seeking
assurances about system compliance, the inspector will be keen to see evidence of coordinated and disciplined
activity on the maneuvering area during normal and low visibility operations.
Introduction
This guide is aimed primarily at reviewing risk assessments as part of the risk management process of an SMS. The
guidance addresses qualitative risk assessments or quantitative assessments when built on a foundation of analysis of a
small database. A reminder at the start; risk assessments are a valuable tool to assist in decision-making, but cannot
offer guarantees. Wrongly used or abused and the following proposition could reflect reality:
80
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
“Risk assessment is like a political prisoner: if you torture it long enough, it may give you the answer you want”.
Also, bear in mind that sometimes hazard identification, together with mitigating actions, might be sufficient for a particular
set of circumstances. Before the regulator receives the assessment the owner should have had it validated within their
company, in line with the arrangements in their Safety Management System (SMS). The licence holder has the
responsibility to assess and manage the operational risks at their airport, not the regulator. The risk assessment is for the
licence holder to undertake; if they are unable to do this then it could be argued that there is a competence issue.
The role of the regulator and the purpose of their safety review are to be satisfied about the licence holders’ management
of safety, including the licence holders’ assessment of risks, as part of licence holder’s SMS.
A review cannot be effectively undertaken unless the regulator and the industry know what the regulator is seeking and
what industry’s expectations are when they send the regulator an assessment. It may not be necessary for the regulator
to review all of a license holder’s risk assessments; which ones and when is a matter for the judgment of the regulator
taking into account the maturity of the license holder’s safety management system and regulatory resource. Above all
else the regulator must be satisfied that any risk assessment or simple, but rigorous, hazard identification, together with
accompanying mitigations, has produced a valid and acceptable answer.
However, in some cases it may be difficult to evaluate the answer to that question directly, but indirect evaluation by
posing audit style questions such as the following may assist. Although the following use the term risk assessment, much
of it is equally applicable to hazard identification, which is the first step in the risk assessment process:
1. Is the company’s risk assessment process likely to enable and encourage a valid, complete and correct assessment to
be made?
2. If so, has that process been applied adequately and would the conclusions be defendable, in a court of inquiry for
example?
81
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
In simple language, have the significant risks to aircraft safety been identified and sufficient mitigating actions taken to
manage them? In even more simplistic terms, has the producer of the assessment identified what could go wrong, as well
as what could fail, and demonstrated that what they are doing, or are preparing to do about it good enough?
Discussion
Industry should not use the risk assessment process as a way around or out of a regulatory requirement because they do
not like the requirement, or it is considered difficult to implement. Just being difficult is not the same as insurmountable;
the latter may be a justifiable reason for seeking DGCA acceptance for a non-compliance, and the use of risk
management to identify appropriate mitigating measures, but not the former.
The risk assessment process should be undertaken for safety significant changes or circumstances that include:
1. New and significant, equipment, infrastructure, traffic levels or even organisational changes that are to be introduced.
2 The licensee/applicant cannot meet a specific regulatory requirement for a reason that has been indicated to be
considered by the regulator as valid and in line with the provisions of National Requirements.
3. The regulatory requirements/guidance do not cover a specific situation, or the requirement/guidance may not go far
enough for a specific set of circumstances.
4. The requirement is written in an objective (goal based), rather than prescriptive, style that allows more than one-way
of compliance.
In the event of an accident, or even incident, the safety or risk assessment could be under scrutiny by parties such as the
relevant accident investigation authority, the courts and insurers. Without overplaying that issue the regulator has to be
satisfied about fundamental safety assurances before accepting a risk assessment received from those it regulates.
It must be remembered that the regulator’s safety review can be valid only for the situation covered by the risk
assessment; if the assessment does not cover changes in levels or type of traffic for example then the review and
conclusions would not be valid for those changes.
82
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
The continued validity of the scope of a risk assessment underlines the need for assessments to be continually reviewed
to determine if there have been any changes to the situation originally assessed. The owners of risk assessments should
be encouraged to review their assessments on a regular basis, for example annually, in order to verify their validity and to
get into the habit of review.
How does the regulator respond to a challenge to the credentials of staff undertaking safety reviews of industry risk
assessments? Staff members need to feel confident and comfortable about this; an answer could be that the regulator is
doing no less than they may have in the past, as a sensible regulator and as a long stop for those regulated. However,
that is not quite enough. The regulator expects those that it regulates to present robust material using a rigorous process.
It is reasonable to expect the regulator to practice what it preaches; a regulator’s opinion, particularly one that leads to a
non-acceptance or non-approval, must be able to stand up to challenge. As part of this, regulatory staff members need to
be sufficiently confident and competent in risk assessment in order to be able to evaluate and accept assessment-based
safety assurances from industry.
The regulator must be meticulous in recording conclusions and use all of the expertise it has within its ranks, particularly
where specialist discipline expertise is required and that discipline is not represented in the aerodrome department of the
regulator, or ATS department for the aerodrome/ATS interface areas.
An ultimate test of satisfaction about the validity of a risk assessment received from those regulated would be for the
regulator to be satisfied that the owner of the risk assessment could robustly defend that risk assessment as being
complete, objective, reasonable, correct and in accordance with the company SMS.
Additionally, that any mitigating measures and actions are commensurate with the level of risk and effective as risk
reduction mechanisms. If the regulator cannot be confident and satisfied about that then they would have difficulty
defending their evaluation and acceptance of the assessment. If the regulator cannot pass this test after challenge by a
court of law for example, then they will lose credibility. The regulator must also be able to demonstrate that it applies a
standard approach.
83
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Risk Assessment
Applying the above, the regulator needs to determine if they are comfortable about the following issues, by asking
questions such as those in italics (answers should be Yes, or Y):
1. The claim being made by the licence holder and the objective he is seeking to meet – are they stated up front in the
risk assessment?
Y/N
2. The levels of ownership of the assessment – is there sufficient evidence that the assessment has been assessed,
challenged, accepted and signed off by the people in the company with the relevant and overall safety
accountabilities, before being presented to the regulator?
Y/N
3. Uncertainty and its treatment in order to reduce uncertainty as much as practicable and in proportionate to the risk
– has the licence holder undertaken a sensitivity test as a means of giving more credibility in any areas of
uncertainty that are inherent in any qualitative (and even quantitative) assessment process, rather than just
accepting a “first pass” that give results that seem acceptable? This might be demonstrated by evidence of
reiteration in the risk assessment process.
Y/N
4. The scope of the assessment – does it cover all the likely hazards, including human factors and any new hazards
introduced by mitigation measures for original risks? Y/N
5. Priority of aircraft safety compared to commercial and other interests:
a. Has the licence holder stated their safety policy and criteria for acceptability?
Y/N
b. Has the licence holder complied with their own policy in relation to the priority given to safety?
Y/N
84
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
6. The degree of objectivity employed – what evidence is there that the assessment has been undertaken in an
objective way and not to produce a pre-determined or desired outcome, irrespective of the actual risk? For
example:
a. Are there terms of Reference for the risk assessment team: if so could they have constrained the team
towards a desired outcome, either directly or by implication?
Y/N
b. Were the impact and hazards of all aspects of a particular change included in the assessment; for example,
the impact on operations, equipment and procedures?
Y/N
c. Has the licence holder come to a conclusion and formulated an action plan, including a review process for
the assessment?
Y/N
7. The degree and usage of a constructive culture of challenge as part of the overall process, within the company
safety culture, but without incurring unnecessary external consultant costs. This is important when the assessment
has been done for the licence holder by a third party, be it a consultant or member of the Corporate body that owns
the aerodrome, or aerodromes if group ownership.
a. Is there a “peer review” (an independent team of peers), or similar mechanism in the process?
Y/N
b. Did the team that undertook the hazard identification and the evaluation of the risk acceptability include an
objective challenger acting in a non-partisan and independent manner?
Y/N
i. If there is, as the regulator would expect, is there evidence at the appropriate level, not necessarily
detailed, to show that their input was heeded and acted on and has the action been recorded?
Y/N
85
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
The above are examples only; there can be others, as well as those that cascade from initial questions. The following are
some additional points and questions to consider in the detailed evaluation, having used the above process as a
preliminary action:
Check the make-up of the hazard identification team. Does it include all the necessary disciplines?
Have all the hazards been identified (they may have been, but then rejected of course), or are there perceived gaps;
for example, the rejected take-off around V1 for RESA assessment or the safety implications of an environmental
imperative in a new ATS procedure?
Are the language, risk matrix and process used appropriate to aircraft safety risks? Is the risk matrix part of the SMS
procedures? Whilst the process addressing occupational safety can be similar to for aircraft operational safety, in
terms of the basic steps and risk matrix, the concept language, definitions and sub-processes will need to be different.
This is an issue for those licence holders who want a detailed process applicable to all risks.
With respect to sensitivity testing, has the licence holder asked the question – is my judgement of severity or probability
too optimistic and what would be the result if I made either or both more pessimistic? For example, where there is
uncertainty about the level of risk, did the licence holder do a reiteration, moving along one or both axes in the risk matrix
to see if the result would be different and, if it was, to determine what the mitigation measures might be for that reiteration
(it can be valid in the other direction of course). In essence, have they gone through the what if reasoning?
Has the licence holder relied too much on historic data and experience, particularly where there is a limited database?
Put another way, have the future trends been adequately identified and taken into account?
Beware of thin and unjustified assessments of, or changes to, probability or severity in order to bring the level of risk
into the acceptable range, and invalid application of the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) philosophy.
Mitigation measures must be action items, included in a plan with timescales and delivery dates, not statements of
intent such as “review”.
86
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Is there a commitment to regular reviews of assessments, including prior to the introduction of significant changes, for
example, a change in the type of traffic?
If the regulator cannot be satisfied about the answers to these and other questions it will be for the evaluation team to
seek guidance from their management. The management team should produce guidance on the make-up of evaluation
teams and signing off requirements for the Directorate.
If mathematical expressions of probability are used they should be in a form that will be appropriate to the circumstance.
Probabilities per flight hour, which derive from aircraft operations, maybe appropriate for ATS purposes, but are not
normally appropriate or very useful for airports, whereas probabilities in terms of events per 10,100 or 1000s of years
could be. However, even the latter measure has limitations; a specific frequency might be acceptable at airport x, with
particular types of aircraft and activity, but not at another with different levels of activity and aircraft types.
Additional aspects to be covered when reviewing safety assurance documentation, be it a Safety Assurance
Report, Safety Assessment or Safety Case
Such documentation is a fundamental component of the management of change, and is a process for developing a
structured argument, supported by a body of evidence that provides a compelling, understandable and valid case that a
system meets the service providers risk acceptability criteria for a given application in a given operating environment.
This process would be applied to a significant change event, such as any pre-determined major change in:
equipment or infrastructure;
traffic type, mix or volume;
operating environment;
staff levels, organisational structure or business model, including contractors’ services.
The purpose is to provide satisfactory safety assurance internally, as well as to the DGCA, operational partners and
users, all in the context of the specific change event, all in the form of an explicit and comprehensive document.
87
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
It must present adequate rationales and evidence that the safety of the aerodrome and its systems are adequate to
support the roles demanded of them. Before presentation to the DGCA for their safety review it has to be signed off by
the highest level of management, expected to be the “Accountable Executive (AE)”. As well as an introduction, it will
comprise the following, and inspectors should be satisfied about the content as they for the outcome of a risk assessment:
a. Of who is accountable, including the post of “Accountable Executive”, and responsible for what within the
licensee’s organisation, as well as other partners and stakeholders’ organisations.
b. On what safety standards apply where, with specific targets stated, where applicable.
c. About any assumptions made, and the communications with and outcomes of the ATS provider and users.
In essence a comprehensive technical specification, whilst being proportional to the level of complexity of the
subject area.
c) Statements of what can go wrong, where and with what potential outcomes. An explanation of the procedures
used for this process of risk assessment.
d) Statements of the process used to determine the acceptability, or otherwise, of these identified risks. This will
include what has or will be done and by when in order to reduce risk, in accordance with the licensee’s safety risk
tolerability criteria and that will maintain or improve upon the safety performance criteria set by the licensee and
agreed with the DGCA.
88
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
e) Time programming for a change, together with the plan for testing or validation, with operational trials where
appropriate, before transition or introduction into service; in essence, the project plan.
f) The arrangements that will be in place to monitor the system against safety performance expectations, and to
prevent deviations from expected performance. In the event that such deviations cannot be prevented,
promulgated mechanisms for stopping operations in a timely way; include the identification of the post or person
responsible and accountable for making these decisions.
g) How findings from this event will be used as an input to inform the licensee about the readiness and acceptability of
any systems or sub systems needed in the longer-term and how to maintain or improve safety.
h) Evidence that is available to support the validity, scope and acceptability of all the above.
Purpose:
To be satisfied that the new site will be practical for a new airport, taking account of such issues as required non-
DGCA clearances, CARs, and the ground and airspace environment, noting any potential hazards, such as
weather.
89
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
b. For site-visit
i. As well as assessing general compliance, evaluate:
ii. Soil condition, for example, would it be susceptible to water-logging, or encouraging wildlife,
particularly birds.
iii. Potential for obstructions such as trees to become a problem in years to come through growth.
iv. Confirm or otherwise, intial satisfaction or concerns from the office-based document audit/study.
Conclusion:
The inspector has to be satisfied about the locational advantages/ disadvantages of the site vis-à-vis operational
objectives and that the construction process is meeting the regulatory compliance and quality assurance.
9. SMS
Purpose:
To be satisfied that the facility provision not only meets the safety requirements, in accordance with the CARs, but
that the minimum requirements are exceeded where found to be necessary, and that the Licensee has rigorous
SMS processes in place in order to ensure that:
90
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
adequate risk management mitigation/control measures are identified, adhered to and reviewed on a regular
basis, in order to ensure that they remain “fit-for purpose”; and
coordination and collaborative working between the relevant stakeholders addresses the particular risks to
safety that have given the airport the “critical” designation.
a. Scope and rigour of the hazard identification and risk management process, including evidence of its
application.
b. Matching the overall provision to any specific weather hazard that has contributed to the “critical”
designation, for example wind-shear warning systems if appropriate.
c. Consider the adequacy of system, rather than specific elements in isolation, for example:
i. The SMGCS:
Does the overall system provision reflect the guidance on SMGCS in ICAO Docs 9426 and
9830?
Viewing the overall airside facility from the ATC visual control room can be a very effective way
of seeing the system as a whole and system interfaces.
Look for Black holes that may present a hazard in the context of runway incursion outcomes.
ii. The areas surrounding the runway, not only the basic land and distance provisions, but surface, slope
and suitability for purpose requirements.
Are all of the “essential for navigation” equipments in the strip mounted on surface flush and
de-lethalised plinths, as well as being frangibly mounted?
Are all electrical ducts properly covered and maintained?
Is the cleared and graded area really cleared and graded and what about the area beyond;
should that be cleared and graded if excursions are more probable, for whatever reason.
iii. Runway – not only meeting slope and strength requirements, but if runway length and minimum
provision of RESA is a reason for “critical” designation, that the following are the focus of rigorous
provision, maintenance and performance monitoring (in relation to SOPs):
Runway safety team.
Runway safety equipment, e.g. dedicated surface friction measuring devices.
91
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
92
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Appendix 5
Format for Inspection Report Form and airports’ Action Taken Reports
The following is an illustration of the use of the Inspection Checklist as an Inspection Report, with imaginary
findings, 2 in number.
NAME OF AERODROME:
TRAFFIC
DENSITY
DECLARED TRAFFIC DENSITY, VISIBILITY
VISIBILITY
CONDITION AND AERODROME LAYOUT –
CONDITION
(Refer to ICAO Docs 9476, SMGCS and
9830, Advanced SMGCS) AERODROME
LAYOUT
93
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
By telephone during office preparation or at the pre During the on-site inspection/audit
and post briefs
1. XXX 1. WWWW
2. YYY 2. ZZZZ
POST INSPECTION REPORT AND ACTION PLAN
FINDING
94
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
95
Inspectors Handbook March/2011
Appendix 6
In addition to the above the minimum scope and depth for an inspection, either
by physical or audit style inspection, including observation of day-to-day
operations (of SOPs for example), will be as listed below. The areas match
those in the inspection checklist.
96
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
An up-to-date plan clearly showing all the access points to the movement
area.
A procedure describing the access checks.
A procedure describing the fence checks if required.
Coordination with ATM services for the inspections of the movement area.
Description of the scope and periodicity of the inspections, and the
reporting, transmission and filing.
Actions to be taken and their monitoring.
Assessing the state of the runway, i.e. flooded, water patches, wet or
contaminated, and describing who orders the measures, who does them
and how, and how the ATM services are informed of the results.
A snow and ice control plan, including the means and procedures used as
well as the responsibilities and criteria for closing and reopening the
runway.
Coordination for snow and ice removal between the aerodrome operator
and the ATM services.
Plans to deal with other meteorological hazardous situations that may
occur on the aerodrome, such as strong winds.
Procedures describing the actions that have to be taken, and defining the
responsibilities and criteria for closing and reopening the runway.
Coordination with the weather services in order to be advised of any
significant weather phenomenon.
97
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Describing:
Obstacles control:
For coordination between the aerodrome operator and the ATM services,
including awareness on LVP status, and on deterioration of visual aids
status.
To describe the actions to be taken when LVP are in process, including
vehicle control, visual range measurement and the protection of navigation
aids.
Actions to take in the event of failure or infringement of an element in the
LVP system requirement.
98
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
For formal and adequate driver training including continuous and specialist
training, and awareness education.
To ensure that:
vehicles on the movement area are adequately maintained and
equipped;
all drivers have undertaken the formal training plan;
vehicle operations are adequately monitored.
Real time display updates of stands, with associated limitations and any
restrictions that apply.
Allocation of stands, in coordination with ATC and aircraft operator.
99
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Describing the actions taken for discouraging the presence of wildlife, who
is in charge of those actions and their required competence requirements.
How and when these actions are carried out, including the reporting and
filing of these actions.
To record and analyse the incidents involving animals.
To collect the animals’ remains and take follow-up action.
To monitor corrective actions.
To report incidents involving animals, as required.
For coordination with the ATM services during wildlife management
activity.
Disabled aircraft plan describing the tasks of the aerodrome operator and the
means available – or that can be made available.
100
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Promulgating safety-critical information, including that for the AIP, such as “Hot
Spots” and Notams:
For the collection and evaluation of data and other source material, in
order to identify “Hot Spots”.
For the production and promulgation of the “Hot Spot” chart.
SMS Manual:
101
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
AEP:
102
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Adequate illumination that is fit for purpose, but does not create a
distraction for pilots or Air Traffic Controllers.
Sufficient equipment parking areas for the amount of apron equipment.
Clear markings.
Evidence of the stands being used by the type of aircraft for which the
stand and its clearances are designed.
Fuel shut off switches at the Head of stands if there is a fuel hydrant
system.
A clean and FOD/litter-free apron surface.
Baggage trolleys having a means of securing bags during transit on and
around the apron.
Clear exit routes for fuel bowsers.
Overall appearance of the runway lighting as seen from the ATC Control
tower if possible, if not from the most appropriate positions on the runway
and undershoot/overshoot areas (taking account of potential hazards to
inspectors).
There should be a system for assessing/measuring light output and the
procedures for corrective action.
Are there policies on action to be taken in the event of consecutive lights
outages that could be more significant than single light outages?
PAPI maintenance; an impression of the rigour of the maintenance level
can be ascertained form a general visual assessment of the PAPI units,
their mountings and the surrounding area s, and by using the “PAPI”
dance. Ask about the PAPI checks and, if necessary ask for a
demonstration of how a ground check is carried out.
103
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
SMGCS:
Any obstacles that do penetrate the OLS have been the subject of the
necessary risk management, are marked, lit, marked on appropriate
charts, and are the subject of any operational restrictions, as appropriate.
Obstacle free zone surfaces to be defined in compliance with the
regulation when
required, with no object infringements.
Objects on the areas near the runway or the taxiways to be recorded and
to meet the requirements (Runway strips, clearway, stop way, runway end
safety area, taxiway strips, radio altimeter operating area, pre-threshold
area).
104
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Wildlife management:
Aerodrome maintenance:
The programme for visual navigation aids and the SMGCS equipment,
and actions that are taken when faults are found, particularly if those faults
could compromise the visual navigation aids or SMGCS appropriate to the
operating conditions at the time.
Systems for real-time monitoring and feed-back of service provision
systems that are operationally critical, including communication systems.
General and pavement maintenance systems – observation of an element
of such maintenance should be included during the 2 year cycle; periods
of temporary runway closure for painting or other maintenance work are
particularly useful for a mixture of physical inspection and audit.
Be properly approved/certified.
105
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Organizational competence:
106
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Appendix 7
Technical backgrounds may vary, but all individuals must possess a skill-set
covering the following areas and, ideally the collective experience should cover
all technical disciplines. The degree to which each staff member is expected to
meet the expectations will be dependent on their role in DOAS:
Communication.
Technical and safety professional competence in the areas regulated.
Interviewing techniques.
Auditing techniques.
The principles of project management.
Airport Management systems.
Drafting in clear concise and unambiguous style regulatory documents,
including inspection and other reports.
Competence to evaluate aerodrome infrastructure project and licensing
application documents, as submitted by applicants and licensees.
Competence to explain/justify, at the pre and post audit briefs, the line of
enquiry.
Competence to extract information/facts from a reluctant interviewee.
Competence to record findings (partly as subsequent evidence).
Use of probing/open questions rather than just tick boxes, including “What
If” questions, and those that go beyond just checking compliance of
hardware, infrastructure and facilities.
107
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
1. Qualifications
2. Experience
108
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Appendix 8
DOAS technical staff must be trained both initially recurrently for their specified
role in DOAS. That includes the lead inspector role, as well as for any required
specialisation, all appropriate to the specific operating environment and to
facilitate/produce a balanced multi-disciplined safety-oversight team.
Initial training must include on-the -Job Training (OJT) with appropriate
supervision. For inspectors, an observed and assessed inspection completed
must be completed before being cleared to operate without supervision.
Assessment must be performance oriented with a minimum performance
expectation. OJT will complement the theoretical training and offer opportunities
to reinforce that training. Once cleared to operate without supervision a staff
member must be thoroughly briefed on the issues at the airports with which he
will be involved. All technical staff must also be trained in the process and
procedures used to coordinate with other elements of the DGCA and agencies
within the State structure, particularly at the interface areas.
For officers to upgrade their knowledge at par with international standards and
for efficient functioning, DGCA periodically develops programmes under special
training programmes/schemes in association with international organizations like
EU - India Co-operation Project, India -US ACP program, COSCAP, ENAC
France, ICAO FPP China, SAA etc. The purpose of specialized training is to
upgrade the knowledge and competency of DGCA officers at par with
international standards and for efficient functioning.
109
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
1. The format and duration for the courses will be dictated by the scope of
the content. However, for the inspection role, the initial course after basic
DGCA/DOAS induction should be a minimum of 8 weeks. That should
include OJT, participating at an increasing level of involvement, in at least
3 inspections plus an assessed inspection before being cleared to operate
without supervision. All courses should include a pass/fail written and oral
examination.
110
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Appendix 9
Induction - Module 1
111
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Phase II
12. ❖ General Administration
❖ General Rules
❖ Conduct rules ISTM/ Any
❖ Office procedures 1 week other
❖ General Financial Rules Specialised
❖ Delegation of Financial Powers Rules institute
❖ RTI & Parliament Questions etc
Phase III
13. Management/ Personality Development Any
Training Specialised
1 week
Institute like
IIPA
Module- II
Phase-1
112
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Phase-2
113
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
4
ICAO Doc 9137 (Airport Services Manual) 08 session
❖ Rescue and fire-fighting DGCA Officers /
❖ Pavement surface conditions Any other
❖ Bird control and reduction specialised
❖ Removal of disabled aircraft institute
❖ Control of obstacles
❖ Airport emergency planning
❖ Airport operational services
❖ Airport maintenance practices
114
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
115
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
SL
SUBJECTS DURATION TRAINER
NO.
1. 2 Nos of inspection for initial issue of As per DGCA Officers
aerodrome license (01 for observation, surveillance
01 under inspection plan
supervision)
Or
3 Nos of surveillance inspection (01
for observation, 02 under supervision)
Specialised training
116
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Recurrent training
SL
SUBJECTS DURATION TRAINER
NO.
1. Change in CAR section 4 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
and ICAO Annex 14 specialised institute
Volume I Requirements
2. Airport Certification 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
specialised institute
3 Safety Management 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
System specialised institute
4 State Safety Program 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
Implementation specialised institute
5 Safety Oversight 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
Inspections specialised institute
6 ARFF Operation 02 session DGCA Officers / Any other
specialised institute
117
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Appendix 10
To: The Applicant or equivalent for new site, or Accountable Executive for a
previously licensed facility/licensee
Dear Sir
This is to inform you that The Directorate of Aerodrome Standards of the DGCA
will be undertaking a safety regulatory inspection of your airport, as required by
the Rules/CARs of India, during the period XXXX.
The team, comprising ZZZZZ and led by VVVV will arrive for the pre-inspection
brief on MMMM, and the scheduled day of departure will be NNNNN. The format
of the inspection will be confirmed at the pre-brief, but will be along the following
lines:
118
Inspectors Handbook March /2011
Should you have any queries please contact the DOAS at any of the following
contacts:
119
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 11
GUIDELINES
3. Inspecting officer shall record YES if the element is complying with the requirement
and NO if it is not complying with the requirement, comments if any, should be
recorded in the space provided below the specific section. If the element is not
applicable to the concerned aerodrome, N/A should be used.
5. The action taken by the operator should be reviewed by the Inspector, there may
not be a requirement to complete this checklist while checking the ATR for
acceptance, however the previously completed checklist should be referred.
120
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
121
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Aerodrome Location
Aerodrome Reference point (WGS-84)
Aerodrome Elevation/ Undulations
Runaway elevations, Low points, touchdown
points
Aerodrome Reference Temperature
Aerodrome Beacon
List of Exemption Granted.
Name, Address and Telephone Nos. of
Aerodrome Operator.
Comment:
122
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
123
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
124
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
125
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
126
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
127
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Comments:
128
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Comments:
129
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
130
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
131
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
competency
Safety Policy statement for maintaining
safety
Safety Policy statement improving safety
performance
Safety Policy statement for implementing
safety system
Comments
Recommendations:
Signature of Inspector.
132
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 12
2. The reference documents for the checklist are CAR Section 4 Series F Part I,
CAR Section 4 Series B Part I ADAC 1 of 2006. Aerodrome Standards
Procedural Manual.
4. The inspector should determine that the licensing application is complete in all
respects including:
a. It’s made for intended category, the requisite fee has been remitted,
aerodrome manual is submitted and all mandatory NOCs are in place and
valid.
b. approval from BCAS indicating that aviation security measures are
integrated into the design and construction of aerodrome and its facilities.
c. MoU/ LoA with AAI for ensuring elements of AIS and CNS/ATM for local
airspace of the aerodrome.
d. measures exists for ensuring provision of ARFF, Meteorology and Security
services.
e. for public use aerodrome, safety assessment report has been submitted
demonstrating that aerodrome and its facilities are safe for aircraft
operation.
6. Records of all such completed checklists and action taken shall be maintained
in respective files.
133
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
DATE OF ASSESSMENT
134
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
its facilities.
12. Availability of arrangement with
AAI for coordination regarding
local airspace, AIS and other
relevant operational
procedures ( e.g. MoU/ LoA)
13. Record and brief operator
regarding non- compliance by
way of inspection report
14. Receive corrective action plan
15. Review status of corrective
action plans
16. Verify and document corrective
action taken
17. Ensure all open issues are
resolved.
18. Ensure all checklists have
been completed
19. Verify all items are closed or
acceptable exemption has
been granted. ( Checklist at
Appendix 13 for Exemptions should
be completed)
20. Obtain DG approval for
issuance of license
21. Prepare Aerodrome License for
issuance
22. Determine Special Conditions
23. Update License register
24. Issue License
25. Post / handover licence
26. Notify AIS of aerodrome
particulars
27. Modify surveillance plan.
Signature of Assessor ............................
Date
135
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 13
2. The reference documents for the checklist are CAR Section 4 Series B Part I,
CAR Section 4 Series B Part IV, ADAC 1 of 2012, ADAC 2 of 2009 and
Aerodrome Standards Procedural Manual.
4. The inspector should determine that the exemption application is complete in all
respects supported by relevant documents.
6. Records of all such completed checklists and action taken shall be maintained in
respective files
136
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
137
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 14-A
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I, ADAC 1 of 2011 and ADAC 1 of 2006
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used.
138
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
CHECKLIST ON ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
PERSONNEL
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Name of Aerodrome:
Name of Responsible Post Holder:
S/N ITEM YES NO N/A
1. Does the officer have a job description?
INSPECTOR'S REMARK:
Signature
Date
139
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 14-B
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I, ADAC 1 of 2011 and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used..
140
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
REMARK:
Signature of inspector
Date
141
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 15
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, trainings etc. for each function should be verified for effective
implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
142
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
INSPECTION LIST FOR AIRPORT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
143
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 16
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, trainings etc. for each function should be verified for effective
implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
144
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
INSPECTION CHECKLIST – AIRPORT RESCUE & FIRE SERVICES
Checklist includes General safety items, Training and Administration, Operational,
Ambulance and Medical requirements.
Effort should be made to cover areas depending on the time allocated for the
inspection and deficiencies to be reflected quoting the legislative reference of CAR/
guidance material.
Name of the Aerodrome : ---------------------------------------
Date of Inspection : --------------------
Aerodrome Category for Rescue & Fire Services: ------------------------------------------
Responsible Post Holder--------------------------------------
Sl.No. Inspection Item Ref Remarks
A. General Requirements
A Level of Protection
A.1. Is level of Fire Services compliant CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.2.3
with Airport category
A.2. Does the airport have a fire ICAO DOC 9137-AN/898
Part I, Para 9.2.1
station and located at strategic
location in relation to runway
pattern
A.3. Can the fire station house all the ICAO DOC 9137-AN/898
Part I, Para 9.3.3
vehicles (minimum clearance of
1.2 M around each vehicle)
A.4. Is unrestricted accessibility to the ICAO DOC 9137-AN/898
Part I, Para 3.2.1
runways possible
A.5. Is the minimum useable amount CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.2.11
of water for fire extinguishment
available?
A.6. Is the minimum foam compound CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.2.14 &
available for the depletion of two 9.2.15
loads of water carried on the
vehicles?
A.7. Is the minimum required CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.2.19
complementary agent available
on the vehicles
A.8. Can the vehicle at the threshold CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.2.27 & 29
of the furthest runway discharge
145
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
146
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
147
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
148
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
exits
b. seating configuration
c. type of fuel and location of
fuel tanks
d. location of batteries
e. position of break – in-
points on the aircraft
G.7 Operational tactics training ICAO Doc 9137-AN/898
Part I, Para 14.6.3,
a. approach 14.6.9, 14.6.11
b. positioning of aircraft
c. dry drills to raise efficiency
d. application of foam with
vehicle in motion/
stationary
G.8 Do Fire Fighting personnel ICAO Doc 9137-AN/898
Part I, Para 10.4.6
undergo annual physical and
medical examinations? Records
thereof
H Aerodrome Emergency Exercise
H.1 Check if Aerodrome Emergency CAR Section 4 Series B
Part I, Para 9.1.1
Response Plan developed
H.2 Is procedure existing for operation ICAO Doc 9137-AN/898
Part I Para 17.5.6
in low visibility conditions
H.3 Full-scale aerodrome emergency CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.1.13
exercise at intervals mentioned in
CAR. Last date of exercise
H.4 Partial emergency exercises in CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.1.13
the intervening year to ensure
that any deficiencies found during
the full-scale aerodrome
emergency exercise have been
corrected
H.5 A fixed emergency operations CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.1.7/8
center and a mobile command
post should be available for use
during an emergency
H.6 Check if person assigned to CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 9.1.10
assume control of the emergency
operations center and, when
appropriate, another person the
command post
I Ambulance and Medical Services
I.1 The availability of arrangement for CAR Section 4, Series B,
Part I Para 18.5.2
ambulance and medical facilities
I.4 Are these ambulances suitable ICAO Doc 9137-AN/898
Part I Para 7.1.3
type and equipped to deal with
149
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
aircraft disasters
I.5 Are the medical supplies on the ICAO Doc 9137-AN/898
Part I Para 7.1.1
airport regularly checked for
expiry dates?
S. No. Supplementary Findings Remarks
150
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 17
2. The reference document for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part I,
CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, agreements, trainings, etc. for each function should be
verified for effective implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
151
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
AERODROME EMRGENCY RESPONSE PLAN CHECK LIST
Aerodrome Name: ____________________________
152
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
153
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
services
B.6 Communications 4B1 Para 9.1.11 /
AS Cir No. 5 /13
/Doc9137 Part 7 ch
12
B.6.1 Equipment (e.g. telephone lines, -do-
two-way radios, Hot lines)
B.6.2 Portable megaphones -do-
B.6.3 Periodic Testing -do-
B.6.4 Complete and current list of -do-
interagency telephone numbers
with all participants
B.7 Airport emergency exercises 4B1 Para 9.1.12-
9.1.13 & AS Cir No
5 /13 & Doc 9137
Part 7
B.7.1 Is there a procedure to develop, -do-
implement and periodically test
these plans
B.7.2 Full-scale exercise -do-
Signature of Inspector:
Date
154
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 18
LVP Checklist
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, trainings, etc. for each function should be verified for effective
implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
155
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
LOW VISIBILITY OPERATIONS
Aerodrome Name : _________________________________
Date of Inspection :______________________________
Responsible Post Holder: _______________________
A. Aerodrome Manual
A.1 Does the manual have ADAC 1 of 2006
particulars of procedures
for low visibility
operations?
A.2 Does it include the CAR 4B1 & ICAO
arrangements for: The Doc 9476
safeguarding procedures,
airside access and Airside
works restrictions and
checks of lighting
installations and signs?
B Record keeping
B.1 List of documents ---
checked
B.2 Is the operator CAR 4B1
maintaining records in
accordance with
aerodrome manual
C Facilities
C.1 Are adequate and suitable CAR 4B1
staff and equipment
available?
C.2 Are appropriate signs, CAR 4B1
gates and warning signs
in place for low visibility
operations?
C.3 Rapid Exit Taxiway CAR 4B1, Para
indicator lights for RWY 5.3.15.1
intended for RVR <350M
C.4 Rwy centerline lights for CAR 4B1, Para
156
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
157
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Date
158
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 19
SMGCS Checklist
2. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006.
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, trainings, etc. for each function should be verified for effective
implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
159
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM
Date of Inspection :
160
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
161
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
procedures and
phraseology
C.3 Use of signaling lamp CAR/9/C/I,
Appendix A
C.4 Control of other than PANS-RAC,
Part 5
aircraft traffic on the
maneuvering area
C.5 Operation of lighting aids PANS-RAC, Part 5
Date:
162
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 20
2. The reference documents for the checklist is Rule 91, CAR Section 4
Series B Part I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006,
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, trainings, etc. for each function should be verified for effective
implementation of requirement referenced at point 2.
163
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
WILD LIFE HAZARD & PREVENTION INSPECTION
Name of Aerodrome ________________________________
Date of Inspection: __________________________________
Aerodrome Accountable Manager: ______________________
Sl. Inspection Item Ref Observations Level
No.
A AEMC
A.1 Whether AEMC CAR Section 4,
meetings are conducted Series B, Part I,
regularly. Chapter 9.4.4,
A.2 Whether inspection in CAR Section 4,
and around the ten Series B, Part I,
kilometer radius of airport Chapter 9.4.4,
carried out. Aircraft Rule 1937
sub rule 91
A.3 Whether the sources of CAR Section 4,
bird attraction in and Series B, Part I,
around airport identified Chapter 9.4.4,
and proactive measures ICAO ASM Part 3,
on time bound bases Aircraft Rule 1937
taken. sub rule 91
A.4 Whether Minutes of the CAR Section 4,
meeting and action Series B, Part I,
taken forwarded to Chapter 9.4.4,
DGCA Hqrs and its ICAO ASM Part 3,
concerned regional
offices regularly.
A.5 Whether inspection of CAR Section 4,
illegal slaughtering Series B, Part I,
around the ten kilometer Chapter 9.4.4,
radius of airport carried ICAO ASM Part 3,
out. Aircraft Rule 1937
sub rule 91
B PERSONNEL/ TRAINING
B.1 Induction and refresher ICAO ASM Part 3
training of staff engaged Para 4.9.1 & 4.9.7
in bird control activities
B.2 Check if the training is ICAO ASM Part 3
164
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
identification of wet
lands, drainages,
agriculture, water
ponds, stream etc.,
forest shrub areas have
been carried out in and
around aerodromes.
D.3 Check for habitat
CAR Section 4,
management
Series B, Part I,
programme on the
Chapter 9.4.3,
airport.
ICAO ASM Part 3.
D.4 Whether, ecological CAR Section 4,
measures are Series B, Part I,
implemented to reduce Chapter 9.4.3,
wildlife attractiveness at ICAO ASM Part 3.
the airport and in the
vicinity.
D.5 Whether Risk CAR Section 4,
assessment of wildlife Series B, Part I,
(bird/animal) strikes is Chapter 9.4.3,
being carried out. ICAO ASM Part 3.
D.6 Whether, Airport fence CAR Section 4,
is suitable to prevent Series B, Part I,
hazardous wild life Chapter 9.4.3,
incursion. ICAO ASM Part 3.
D.7 Check for proper CAR Section 4,
disposal garbage, food Series B, Part I,
remains inside the Chapter 9.4.3,
aerodrome. ICAO ASM Part 3.
D.8 Check for the existence CAR Section 4,
of ponds, water logging Series B, Part I,
areas and inside the Chapter 9.4.3,
airfield, which provides ICAO ASM Part 3.
right conditions for
proliferation of frogs,
crabs, snails, aquatic
insects and fish in the
aerodrome area which
attract birds/wildlife.
D.9 Check for availability of CAR Section 4,
pigeon proof net or Anti Series B, Part I,
bird gel inside aviation Chapter 9.4.3,
hangers in aerodrome to ICAO ASM Part 3.
avoid pigeon/ bird
hazard to aircraft.
166
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
167
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Date
168
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 21
2. The reference documents for the checklist is Rule 91, CAR Section 4
Series B Part I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006,
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, agreements/ co-ordinations etc.
169
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
170
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
171
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 22
2. The reference documents for the checklist is Rule 91, CAR Section 4
Series B Part I, CAR Section 4 Series F Part I and ADAC 1 of 2006,
4. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. The availability of human resource, facilities,
procedures, agreements/ co-ordinations etc.
172
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
CHECKLIST FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (VISUAL AIDS)
173
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
174
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
175
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
176
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
Appendix 23
3. The reference documents for the checklist is CAR Section 4 Series B Part
I, para 5.3.25.
7. The inspector should always ensure that the current and updated copy of
this checklist is used. Records of all such completed checklists and action
taken shall be maintained in respective files.
177
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
GOVT OF INDIA
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION
AERODROME STANDARDS DIRECTORATE
Checklist for Visual Docking Guidance System
178
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
179
Inspectors Handbook March / 2011
List of Observations:
Inspecting Officer
Date
180