Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
• Baxter Pharmaceuticals
– Need to know what works and at what costs • Shorten hospital length of stay
Perioperative Management
Preoperative Considerations
Joshi, Girish, MB, BS, MD, FFARCSI Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Preoperative Optimization
Preanesthesia Assessment
Improves Perioperative Outcome
• Suboptimal preoperative care (i.e., inadequate • Preoperative screening and optimization of
patient evaluation or incorrect preoperative comorbidities
Premedication Controversies
Residual Effects of
Sedative-hypnotics/Opioids/NMBs
• Delays emergence from anesthesia
• Increases OT stay, PACU stay, ICU admission
Problems that plagues the practice
• Compromises airway patency
of anesthesia is that the residual • Increases pharyngeal dysfunction, aspiration
effects of hypnotic-sedative/ • Decreases ventilatory response to hypoxia
opioids/muscle relaxants influence and hypercarbia
Disadvantages
Advantages • Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
• Increase PONV
• Amnesia and analgesia • 30 studies (2297 patients with N2O vs. 2301
• Fernandez-Guisasola et al: Anaesthesia
– anesthetic and opioid dose 2010; 65: 379-87 patients without N2O)
• circulatory stability • Expand closed spaces (bowel)
• Avoiding N2O reduced risk of PONV, but overall
• Influence surgical conditions
• Facilitates emergence impact was modest (absolute 33% vs 27%)
• cardiovascular, pulmonary,
• Propofol induction negate emetic effects of N2O
– Peyton PJ et al: Anesthesiology 2011;114 596
thromobotic morbidity
• persistent postop pain • Leslie K, et al: Anesth Analg 2011;112:387
• Turan A et al: Anesth Analg 2013;116:1026
• Prophylactic antiemetic therapy further negate
– Chan MT et al: Pain 2011; 152: 2514-20
– Echevarria G et al: Br J Anaesth 2011;107:959 • Myles P et al: Lancet 2014
emetic effects of N2O
De Vasconcellos K, Sneyd JR: Br J Anaesth 2014 Fernandez-Guisasola et al: Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 379-87
Thilen SR et al: Anesthesiology 2012; 117:934-6 2 Sasaki N, et al: Anesthesiology 2014; 121: 959-68
Joshi, Girish, MB, BS, MD, FFARCSI Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Neostigmine Dose:
TOF Response at Ulnar Nerve
4 - 20-30
3 ++ 40 Opioids
2 +++ 50
1 ++++ 60
None – Wait
Modified from Bevan et al: Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 785-805
1.00
• Ceiling effect 0
Computer-assisted continuous infusion
0
• Increases potential
for acute tolerance”
Sedation
Respiratory
Depression
hemodynamic changes
Opioid Concentrations
Opioid Bolus
Analgesia
Do not attempt to normalize or
Minimal Analgesic
achieve “tight” control of
Pain
Concentration
1 2 3 4 5
hemodynamic variables (HR/BP)
Time (hours)
Front loading of opioids for achieving longer duration of action is NOT acceptable
Joshi et al: Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1049-55; Aubrun F et al: Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 124-30;
Aubrun F et al. Br. J. Anaesth 2012;108:193-201
Gan TJ, et al Anesth Analg 2014;118:85–113 Kappen TH, et al: Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 343-345
• Intraoperative
– Dexamethasone 4-8 mg
– Ondansetron 4 mg (end of surgery)
• High risk population (add)
– Droperidol 0.625–1.25 mg (intraop) Mechanical Ventilation
– Transderm scopolamine (preop)
– TIVA
• Postoperatively
– Promethazine (Phenergan) 6.25 mg
– Dimenhydrinate 1 mg/kg
– Do not repeat ondansetron, use
another 5HT3 antagonist
– Initial respiratory rate 8/min – Fleischmann et al: Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 944-9
Postoperative Care:
Emergence Considerations Fast Track Rehabilitation
• Primary aim should be to • Avoid tubes, catheters, drains, restrictions
washout inhaled anesthetic, • Early mobilization and physical therapy
not build-up CO2 • Optimize pain relief
• Pressure support ventilation • Respiratory therapy
– Extended lung expansion exercises
to maintain FRC
– Early use of CPAP, non-invasive ventilation,
• Nasal ventilation, superior to early tracheal extubation
oral ventilation • Improve sleep
– Liang Y et al: Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 998
• Early oral feeding
• Semi-upright (30-40º) position
• Early detection of complications
Joshi, Girish, MB, BS, MD, FFARCSI Enhanced Recovery After Surgery