Detailed Damage Assessment of Aitutaki

Residential Housing
by Cyclone Pat

Prepared by
Ministry of Infrastructure & Planning
(MOIP)

15 March 2010
 Detailed Damage Assessment of Aitutaki
Residential Structures in the wake of Cyclone Pat

Background

A day after Cyclone Pat struck the Island of Aitutaki; a Ministry of Infrastructure & Planning
(MOIP) Team consisting of an engineer- Ata Herman and three Building Inspectors -Loius Teiti,
Joe Akaruru & Chalie Tamangaro, was deployed (from the 11 to 13 February 2010), to the island
to carry out an Initial Damage Assessment of the all building infrastructures – from government,
commercial, tourism, community and residential.

The initial assessment reports was broad in scope and focuses on a general overview of the type
of building damage that have occurred, primarily to assist in determining the relief and
immediate response requirements.

Introduction

From 22 February 2010 - twelve days after Cyclone Pat, at the request of the Aitutaki Recovery
committee, a MOIP Team was deployed to Aitutaki for the second time to undertake a more
detailed damage assessment of residential buildings only. The Team consists of three engineers-
Ata Herman, Nemia Tagi & Paul Maoate, building inspector – Joe Akaruru and a
GIS/Survey/database personnel – Alistair Newbigging.

The task of the team was to undertake field assessment survey of all the residential buildings that
had incurred damages by Cyclone Pat wind force. The assessment was very much guided by the
initial damage assessment carried out previously, especially identifying the building locating and
sites, and name of occupiers before and during the cyclone period.

In support of the teams’ efforts, Pat Arioka from Cook islands Red Cross and Reboama Samuel
from the Emergency Management Unit of the Police department, were of great assistance in
cross-referencing of database to include household names and location identifications.

Scope

The assessment was based on a more detailed data acquisition of wind damage to only residential
buildings on the Island. Significant wind damages to roof structures were observed for many of
the buildings with each one of them recorded on templates with associated photographic
identifications. The data was also mapped onto Geographic Information System (GIS) format.
The report will have a study site map, satellite photos of sites, and brief damage description to
the cause of structural failures.

2
Typical Building Structural Systems

In residential buildings, the primary structural systems are made up almost entirely by exterior
load bearing walls and non-load bearing wall, roof structure and diaphragm and foundation. The
overall building integrity depends not only on the strength of these components but also the
adequacy of the connections between them

In the design of structures for wind loading, it is necessary to provide a continuous load path
from the roof down into the (concrete) foundation. In a noticeable number of failed structures
examined this continuous load path was not present.

From general observation, adequately constructed homes stood very well against Cyclone Pat
wind forces. Where there was evidence of a breakdown in the load transfer path, the damage
extent ranged from considerable to total, depending on the type of construction involved.

The roofing systems of all residential buildings investigated were predominantly constructed
with light timber trusses or roof rafter system.

Roof Framing Systems

The roof trusses and rafter cables were found to be less than satisfactory under the wind forces,
the connection between the purlin and the truss or rafter was inadequate. Substandard
workmanship in the fixing of the purlin to trusses was evident. (improper use of a single
vertically driven nail as a tie-down) especially to newer constructed buildings. The much older
housings with timber framed roof structure were found to have timber rots,

General Observed Performance of Buildings

In general, older housing performed poorly with the majority of structural damages occurring on
the structural was associated with older construction (>25 years). The evidence after examining
of the older structures have shown deterioration in the tie down components due to corrosion,
rot, insect attack and leading to reduction in strength and/or non existence of tie downs along the
critical load path.

The Cyclone Pat’s wind force creating severe structural damages, also caused the damaged
structure components such as roofs being detached when wind driven forces threw these debris
on to other adjacent buildings thus instigating damages to that building. The duration of intense
winds also maximized the potential for fatigue failure of roofing, claddings, fixings and
generally roof structures of all buildings damaged.

In some cases of failure of older housing, it was apparent that the house had some upgrading
undertaken. For example, a new roof was fitted with new roofing’s but the roof failure occurred
at the purlin to truss or rafter connection which still had only the original inadequate nail
connection. For housing in flat exposed areas a 90 mm long Type 17 screw is required along
with pre-drilling. Strapping of purlin to rafters would have been alternative and secured
connection.

3
The roof structural connections have primarily contributed to failure of most of these structures.
The poor construction practice was also evidence in regards to inadequate tie down fixings with
only the use of nails without the use of cyclones ties or strapping. The lack of maintenance by
the occupants also leads to failure from corrosion of fixings and structural frame elements.

Findings of Structural damages

The finding based on detailed assessment is divided into:

1. Structural Assessment
2. Non- Structural Assessments
3. General Assessments

Structural Assessments

In the design of structures for wind loading, it is necessary to provide a continuous load path
from the roof down into the (concrete) foundation. In a noticeable number of structures
examined this continuous load path was not present.

The perimeters, including corners, of roofs typically experience the highest uplift pressure during
wind cyclones. Loss of roofing was observed at the perimeters and corners in numerous cases. It
was also observed that when roofing was lost it was that the roofing was nailed too far apart.
Using nail spacing that meets or exceeds the code minimum would have significantly reduced
loss roofing iron in most of the buildings. The nail spacing for corrugated roofing should be
nailed at every second nip or 5 nails per sheet/purlin or 3 type screw per sheet/purlin.

A common failure that was observed was the loss of claddings on the gable end walls. One likely
cause, is that air entered through openings or other means and pressurized the inside of the house
space thus dislodging one or more sections of claddings. The damage to the roof cladding
permitted wind-driven wind and airborne debris to enter the building and resulted in additional
costly damage to the interior and contents.

There were cases where the entire truss system lifted off the roof and the top plate came off with
it. The truss uplift forces were transferred adequately to the top plate, but the top plate had no tie
down mechanism to transfer the load to the wall, since the top plate was not anchored properly.
The result was then a complete loss of the roof system. Many of these failures occurred to old
limestone built wall structures. These limestone buildings were built in the sixties and seventies.

Many of the leanto attachments or extensions to the main buildings were commonly heavily
damaged. Therefore, support columns/posts must be anchored to both the roof and concrete
foundation, particularly in high wind regions such as the hills.

Non-Structural Assessments

Structures with adequate roof ventilations were observed to have performed better due to the
ability of the ventilation to relieve induced internal pressure.

4
Extensive damage was caused and induced by airborne debris. The debris consisted largely of
failed roofing materials, but also included felled trees and branches.

General Assessments

From the observations it was evidence that hip roofs performed significantly better than gable
roofs.

Workmanship

Clearly, not all tradepeople were well qualified in the construction of buildings structural
systems and connections necessary to resist wind loads. Where quality workmanship was
observed, the performance of buildings was improved

Repair/Retrofit of Partially Damaged and Undamaged Buildings

In many buildings, it was observed that damage occurred in one part of the building and that the
reminder of the building was structurally undamaged. Based on this scenario, it was concluded
that the repair of only the ‘damage portions’ of buildings may leave the remainders of the
building vulnerable to damage from future cyclones.

Electrical components

Any homes still containing old wiring should be rewired as soon as possible, and have their fuses
replaced with Circuit Breakers and Residual Current Devices, as required by Cook Islands
Electrical standard and regulations.

Re-wiring, especially to reconstruction of category 3 buildings with most of its roof structure
destroyed, would involve the complete removal of all old cables, old steel conduit and replacing
with new cables. All original sockets, lights switches, light fittings and other electrical fittings
are replaced with modern fittings. New mains cables are installed and the dodgy old fuse board
and fuses are thrown out and replaced with a modern recessed switch board, circuit breakers and
residual current devices (RCDs). Power meters that were once part of the interior fuse board can
be re-located to a new meter board outside, so that the meter reader no longer requires access to
the home.

Finally an electrical inspector will check certain aspects of the job and sign off the Certificate of
Compliance.

Categorised of Building Damages

The detailed assessment followed suit from the initial assessment undertaken previously but with
the categorizing of assessed damaged residential buildings in-line with the four categories as
follows:

5
 • Category 1: Houses with minor damage to roof and walls (0-25%).
• Category 2: Houses with extensive damages to roof and wall structure (26-50%).
• Category 3: Houses with major damage (51-75%).
• Category 4: Houses that have been completely destroyed (76-100%).

The number of houses in each of the categories is based on the revised assessment undertaken

Number of Buildings Assessed per Village 
No.  Village  Cat 1  Cat 2  Cat 3  Cat 4  Count Tot.
1  Amuri  11 10 24 17  62
2  Arutanga  6 9 10 3  28
3  Nikaupara  11 3 9 9  32
4  Reureu  8 4 7 4  23
5  Tautu  8 3 15 11  37
6  Ureia  3 14 10 4  31
7  Vaipae  20 5 15 18  58
8  Vaipeka  0 1 3 5  9
Count  67 49 93 71  280

The above summary is based on the number of residential household assessed during the
Ministry of Infrastructure and Planning Detailed Assessment. The assessment was carried out for
residential houses focus mainly on the living areas, bedroom and kitchen – veranda and garage
were not assessed as they were not considered high priority.

Revised Cost Summary for Remedial Works 
No.  Village  Cat 1  Cat 2  Cat 3  Cat 4  Cost Tot. $
1  Amuri  28,006.31  35,035.09
2  Arutanga  4,735.00  39,723.00
3  Nikaupara  29,183.60  15,939.26
4  Reureu  31,937.20  23,510.70
5  Tautu  18,024.80  15,182.00
6  Ureia  16,685.47  90,493.71
7  Vaipae  47,156.85  19,178.69
8  Vaipeka  0.00  5,454.20
Total $  175,729.23  244,516.65
 
182,396.00 0.00  $245,437.40
144,326.00 0.00  $188,784.00
171,121.85 0.00  $216,244.71
71,465.00 0.00  $126,912.90
276,776.80 0.00  $309,983.60
101,795.67 0.00  $208,974.85
217,051.70 0.00  $283,387.24
27,958.50 0.00  $33,412.70
1,192,891.52 0.00  $1,613,137.40

The above cost summary is based on the building materials required to carry out reconstruction
work per individual household, generally comprising roofing iron, timber framing, water
guttering, concrete, interior and exterior cladding.

6
Conclusions and recommendations

A closer/heavier nailing schedule for roof irons would be helpful in reducing the amount of roof
sheathing loss due to uplift, particularly at the edges and corners, and result in significantly less
water intrusion. In many places the code minimum spacing was not being met.

Many of the leanto attachments or extensions to the main buildings were commonly heavily
damaged. Therefore, support columns/posts must be anchored to both the roof and concrete
foundation..

Careful attention must be paid to all details, particularly the (correct) use of all straps and ties, to
ensure a continuous load path from the roof to the foundation.

The basis for undertaking this assessment is the principle that better performance of building
systems can be expected when causes observed failures are corrected using recognized standards
of design and construction. Attention should be paid to the correct design and construction of
horizontal and vertical load transfer system to resist future building failures. The
recommendations presented in this report may have application to other Islands and communities
in the Cook Islands.

The field assessment outcome indicates the existence of deficiencies in the construction practices
that were employed in the areas, irrespective of the obvious severe wind conditions brought
about by Cyclone Pat.

Quality of construction workmanship urgently needs improvement by developing of a training

program for construction trades people, supervisors and inspectors.

Any homes still containing old wiring should be rewired as soon as possible, and have their fuses
replaced with Circuit Breakers and Residual Current Devices, as required by Cook Islands
Electrical standard and regulations.

Building inspectors and supervisors should be increased or improved, especially in the outer
islands.

Enhancing and maintenance of the Cook Island Geographical Information System (GIS) should
be encouraged. This information contains within the databases can be of value in improving the
implementation of the Building Code. GIS will also strengthen disaster mitigation efforts applied
to the Cook Islands land development process.

For an example the GIS played a major role in supporting the assessment team’s efforts to
identify areas that were damaged. It has shown to be an effective tool in the mitigation and
reconstruction effort after the cyclone.

The following recommendations apply to individual types of buildings and building components.

7
and photographs are provided as templates where appropriate to support or illustrate the
recommendations.

Acknowledgements

In concluding the detailed assessment report we acknowledge the support and assistance of the
Island Mayor, Island Administration Office, Island Councils and a special appreciation to the
people of Aitutaki who have generously assisted with the information required.

Also, in support of the teams’ efforts, Pat Arioka from Cook Islands Red Cross and Reboama
Samuel from the Emergency Management Unit of the Police Department, were of great
assistance in cross-referencing of database to include household names and location
identifications.

The aerial photo’s taken by the New Zealand defense force, is very appreciated to provision of a
birds eye view of the extent of the damaged buildings.

Meitaki maata

8
 APPENDIX A

Roof damage to older Limestone Buildings (50 years+) also prone to the
Cyclonr Pat wind force

Photo 1: Category 2 (CAT 2.) Photo 2: Category 3 (CAT 3.)

The Photos indicates the common failures of roof damages.

Roofing irons found in debris with purlin attached indicating
failures at the purlin/rafter connection. The rafter frames
were also visibly exposed and still intact on the wall.

Photo 3: Category 3 (CAT 3.) Photo 4: Category 3 (CAT 3.)

 APPENDIX A

Roof damage to newer Constructed Buildings also prone to the Cyclonr

Pat wind force

Photo 5: Category 3 (CAT 3.) Photo 6: Category 1 (CAT 12.)

The Photos indicates the common failures of roof damages.

Roofing irons found in debris with purlin attached indicating
failures at the purlin/rafter connection. The rafter an d truss
frames were also visibly exposed and still intact on the wall.

Photo 7: Category 1 (CAT 1) Photo 8: Category 2 (CAT 2.)

 APPENDIX A

Photo 9: (CAT 1) - Entire timber gable Photo 10: (CAT 2) - End of exterior
separation. Bracing and cladding load-bearing wall bottom plate.
connection insufficient Transfer of forces on entire wall
dependent on limited number of nails

Photo 11: (CAT 4) - Shear wall failure Photo 12: (CAT 4) - Exterior timber
due to inadequate diagonal bracing wall frame and roofing frame damage
support. caused by suction wind forces.
Inadequate tie-back connections

Photo 13: (CAT 3) - Masonry
construction building. Wall separated
from building due t6 inadequate vertical
and horizontal wall reinforcing in
connection to horizontal tie-beam
Photo 15: (CAT 3) - Lack of continuous
tie-beam or RC bond led to failure of
masonry wall that was weakened in
construction
APPENDIX A
Photo 14: (CAT 3) - Foundation failure due
to the roof structure imposes
uplift/downward force on the corner wall. It
probably did not help with weak foundation
caused by stormwater drainage nearby.
Photo 16: (CAT 4) – A masonry block
house totally collapses from the roof
structure to the walls itself. Evidence
indicates a lack of reinforcements and
concrete infill.
 APPENDIX A

Photo 17: (CAT 4) – A typical timber Photo 18: (CAT 4) – An older timber
framed building destroyed with the roof framed building totally destroyed.
structure just managing to hold the rest of
the wall structure.

Photo 19: (CAT 4) – A newly built Photo 20: (CAT 4) – Typical limestone
timber framed building totally destroyed building destroyed from roof structure to
by the cyclone wind force. the foundation by the cyclone wind force.
 APPENDIX A

Photo 21: (CAT 2) – Partial roof Photo 22: (CAT 3) - Lack of continuous
structure failure thus exposure of wirings tie-beam led to failure of masonry wall
ceilings prone to damages from rain. that was weakened in construction

Photo 23: (CAT 3) – Total roof structure Photo 24 : – Load-bearing timber frame
failure at the ridging where the rafter to wall failure at the bottom plate with nail
ridge beam was fixed only by nails. Nails fixing only. No bolting fixing visible.
has no capacity to prevent pull out Nails has no capacity to prevent pull out
 APPENDIX B
DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

AMURI BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 1173 Taratoa Tom 3 Amuri 8,337.00 1
2 1164 Armour Strickland 2 Amuri 3,712.00 2
3 1165 Lucy Marsters 3 Amuri 10,511.00 3
4 1326 Paoro Teiti Hse 1 3 Amuri 9,702.00 4
5 1181 Mikaera Tumu 3 Amuri 10,119.00 5
6 1179 Tepaeru Cameron 3 Amuri 3,144.31 6
7 1183 Paora Teiti Hse 2 3 Amuri 6,526.00 7
8 1182 Kiria Kiria 3 Amuri 11,577.00 8
9 1202 Kimiora Mataiti (Pene) 4 Amuri 0.00 9
10 1200 Noo Mataiti 2 Amuri 2,100.00 10
11 1218 Camp Henry 3 Amuri 7,438.00 11
12 1223 Ahiao Paniani 3 Amuri 9,629.00 12
13 1225 Okiroa Reese 3 Amuri 5,076.00 13
14 1230 Charlie Lockington 3 Amuri 5,721.00 14
15 1239 Okiroa Rakitu 3 Amuri 7,776.00 15
16 1229 Meteka Meteka 3 Amuri 3,948.00 16
17 1232 Tamarua Kiria 3 Amuri 5,226.00 17
18 1237 Tiopu Henry 4 Amuri 0.00 18
19 1233 Tapita William 3 Amuri 6,020.00 19
20 1244 Joe Meti 3 Amuri 6,533.00 20
21 1268 Ioane Taua 3 Amuri 5,322.00 21
22 1245 Takapuna Vaikai 3 Amuri 3,808.00 22
23 1318 Clyde Rima 4 Amuri 0.00 23
24 1319 Rangatira Tuare 4 Amuri 0.00 24
25 1260 John Tini 3 Amuri 5,387.00 25
26 1263 George Kuraiki 2 Amuri 2,870.75 26
27 1278 Neil Mitchell 2 Amuri 3,568.52 27
28 1261 Umaki John 1 Amuri 819.20 28
29 1277 Toa Isamaela 3 Amuri 7,914.00 29
30 1316 Eric Ponia 4 Amuri 0.00 30
31 1320 Plumber Teotu 4 Amuri 0.00 31
32 830 Tiamana Tuakana 3 Amuri 4,458.00 32
33 817 Naomi Maoate 2 Amuri 3,313.22 33
34 800 Vaerurangi Teaukura Snr 4 Amuri 0.00 34
35 776 Rangi Pauka 3 Amuri 23,892.00 40
36 1370 Rangi Pauka B 4 Amuri 0.00 41
37 749 Riro & Tutai Teuru 2 Amuri 5,941.20 35
38 748 Ngatuaine Hosking 4 Amuri 0.00 36
39 1321 Charlie Strickland 4 Amuri 0.00 37
40 1335 Roi Steven 1 Amuri 1,057.40 38
41 1322 Tuaine Samuel 4 Amuri 0.00 39
42 752 Apera Teuru 2 Amuri 5,610.00 43
43 738 Teiti Teiti 3 Amuri 6,694.00 44
44 747 Terepai Maoate Jnr 1 Amuri 2,043.00 45
45 736 Noo Rae 3 Amuri 6,709.00 46
46 721 Carmen Temata (Coco Hse) 4 Amuri 0.00 47
47 720 Rakitu Raki 1 Amuri 6,660.00 48
48 715 Alister Webb 4 Amuri 0.00 49
49 712 Mokoenga Ratu 1 Amuri 2,316.00 50
50 714 Ioane Vaevae 4 Amuri 0.00 51
51 713 Kopu Vaevae 4 Amuri 0.00 52
52 710 Tau Vaevae 4 Amuri 0.00 53
53 707 Ricky DeVon 1 Amuri 865.50 54
54 718 Mary Strickland 3 Amuri 4,073.00 55
55 114 Teinakore Katu 2 Amuri 4,164.75 56
56 116 Tupai Veima 4 Amuri 0.00 57
57 115 Terepoto Williams 1 Amuri 2,622.60 58
58 113 David Nicholls 1 Amuri 2,865.00 59
59 775 Teteva Ua 2 Amuri 3,754.65 42
60 88 Maara Tangianau 1 Amuri 2,873.40 60
61 87 Nooroa Teina 1 Amuri 2,739.90 61
62 1,214 Tai Turia 1 Amuri 0.00 62

Count 11 10 24 17 62
Total $ 28,006.31 35,035.09 182,396.00 0.00 245,437.40

ARUTANGA BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 964 Teata Makimare 2 Arutanga 4,653.00 1
2 962 Mataio Karora 1 Arutanga 968.00 2
3 961 Teao Tangaroa 1 Arutanga 436.00 3
4 956 Kaora Kaora 3 Arutanga 18,767.00 4
5 939 Paiti Tamu 3 Arutanga 8,413.00 5
6 938 Ata Makimare 2 Arutanga 12,181.00 6
7 1010 Enua Tuatini 2 Arutanga 4,222.00 7
8 1004 Nga Upu 2 Arutanga 7,841.00 8
9 919 Plumber Nicholas 2 Arutanga 2,670.00 9
10 1310 Mark Baxter 1 Arutanga 971.00 10
11 1315 Matai Simiona 1 Arutanga 1,452.00 11
12 1313 Tai Rikiau Jnr 1 Arutanga 484.00 12
13 696 Tu Bishop 2 Arutanga 1,860.00 13
14 901 Mii Solomona (Blankheart) 1 Arutanga 3,967.00 15
15 890 Tuaine Tuaine 1 Arutanga 5,565.00 16
16 885 Lesly James 1 Arutanga 424.00 17
17 914 Tutai Taae 4 Arutanga 0.00 18
18 876 Moeua Raera 1 Arutanga 2,955.00 19
19 880 Muri Vaka 3 Arutanga 7,316.00 20
20 1002 Uaanga Areai 3 Arutanga 9,911.00 21
21 917 Teetu Jessie (4 Square Church) 4 Arutanga 0.00 22
22 918 Andre Tanga 1 Arutanga 5,990.00 23

SHEET 1
 APPENDIX B
DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

23 920 Tatira Tatira 3 Arutanga 9,793.00 24

24 921 Ngatere Kikoro John 4 Arutanga 0.00 25
25 886 Piri Maao 3 Arutanga 14,142.00 26
26 916 Deborah Arama 3 Arutanga 28,178.00 27
27 913 Tuaine Tetevano 3 Arutanga 19,323.00 28
28 875 Kenny Rota 3 Arutanga 16,302.00 29

Count 6 9 10 3 28
Total $ 4,735.00 39,723.00 144,326.00 0.00 188,784.00

NIKAUPARA BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 511 Ted Teaukura 2 Nikaupara 5,934.70 1
2 514 Tiki Maruaau 4 Nikaupara 0.00 2
3 1301 Joe Prout 1 Nikaupara 1,676.40 3
4 516 Ngatere Rino 1 Nikaupara 2,767.70 4
5 510 Tukua Charlie 1 Nikaupara 2,479.50 5
6 524 Apii Maki 1 Nikaupara 2,487.10 6
7 526 Pare Carl 1 Nikaupara 3,102.70 7
8 580 Uri Paulo 2 Nikaupara 4,069.10 8
9 587 Tairi Paulo 2 Nikaupara 5,935.46 9
10 588 George Ngati 3 Nikaupara 28,702.70 10
11 589 Tutaua Charlie 1 Nikaupara 2,131.20 11
12 644 Kupa Teao 3 Nikaupara 18,391.30 12
13 647 Arama Joseph 4 Nikaupara 0.00 13
14 645 John Tearetoa 3 Nikaupara 15,799.00 14
15 637 Bob Toka 1 Nikaupara 1,939.00 15
16 650 Matangaro Toka 3 Nikaupara 23,634.40 16
17 1305 Mii Makimare nee Jacob 3 Nikaupara 17,209.30 17
18 654 Lucy Tuarai 3 Nikaupara 12,773.50 18
19 505 Taringi Nelio 4 Nikaupara 0.00 19
20 605 Ioane Purua 4 Nikaupara 0.00 20
21 604 Dora Harrington 4 Nikaupara 0.00 21
22 632 Metuakore Strickland 3 Nikaupara 16,574.25 22
23 633 Tania Mataiti 3 Nikaupara 25,004.90 23
24 631 Mii Raea 4 Nikaupara 0.00 24
25 635 William Hewett 4 Nikaupara 0.00 25
26 634 Tukumate Ben 4 Nikaupara 0.00 26
27 641 Teina Ratu 1 Nikaupara 2,616.40 27
28 642 Sunny Drollett 1 Nikaupara 2,713.00 28
29 663 Putangi Mose 1 Nikaupara 4,979.10 29
30 651 Titoru Tekeu 4 Nikaupara 0.00 30
31 669 Kaungake Taia 3 Nikaupara 13,032.50 31
32 671 Ngatokoa Pera 1 Nikaupara 2,291.50 32

Count 11 3 9 9 32
Total $ 29,183.60 15,939.26 171,121.85 0.00 216,244.71

REUREU BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 672 Teaukura Ariki 3 Reureu 11,126.40 1
2 673 John Jessie 3 Reureu 15,171.00 2
3 1308 Maki Teave 3 Reureu 10,051.20 3
4 676 Kimiora Kaveao 1 Reureu 3,159.20 4
5 680 Hosea Tauraki 3 Reureu 9,228.60 5
6 683 Ron Henry 1 Reureu 3,268.40 6
7 628 Taamo Charlie 1 Reureu 4,148.20 7
8 1304 Metuatai Cummings 2 Reureu 6,900.80 8
9 1303 May Kavana 1 Reureu 3,736.40 9
10 945 Ri Anitonia 1 Reureu 1,721.00 10
11 1307 Teokotai Monga 4 Reureu 0.00 11
12 690 Mama Noo Unuka 4 Reureu 0.00 12
13 693 Turoa Arama 1 Reureu 5,784.00 13
14 692 Papa Rua (Maria Nooroa) 3 Reureu 10,186.40 14
15 691 Makirau Haurua 1 Reureu 5,243.00 15
16 694 Toma Matangi 3 Reureu 7,975.10 16
17 687 Janet Pumati 2 Reureu 4,843.00 17
18 627 Kiikore Charlie 1 Reureu 4,877.00 18
19 576 Ruta Tare (House 2) 2 Reureu 5,589.90 19
20 529 Meau Tane 2 Reureu 6,177.00 20
21 1324 Nga Rota 4 Reureu 0.00 21
22 1378 Alfa Maimare 4 Reureu 0.00 22
23 954 Ruta Tare (House 1) 3 Reureu 7,726.30 23

Count 8 4 7 4 23
Total $ 31,937.20 23,510.70 71,465.00 0.00 126,912.90

TAUTU BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 375 Tuvaine Paerau 4 Tautu 0.00 1
2 389 Panapa Tekopua 3 Tautu 7,947.50 2
3 390 Charlie Brothers 3 Tautu 11,273.20 3

SHEET 2
 APPENDIX B
DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

4 1290 Mauo Rito Tekopua 1 Tautu 3,649.00 4

5 386 Kairangi Henry 3 Tautu 16,620.50 5
6 385 Puia Mauri 4 Tautu 0.00 6
7 381 Twin Ruarangi 2 Tautu 8,082.00 7
8 383 Tai Reva 3 Tautu 14,560.90 8
9 364 Tere Drollett 3 Tautu 14,186.50 9
10 365 Natua Ruarangi 4 Tautu 0.00 10
11 462 Apii Tepaki 3 Tautu 28,378.20 11
12 372 Pakeu William 3 Tautu 18,882.30 12
13 463 Piakura Messine 4 Tautu 0.00 13
14 444 Matai Simiona 3 Tautu 29,341.90 14
15 363 Teariki Vairua (nakuao) 3 Tautu 14,755.50 15
16 429 Manaarangi Mataiti 4 Tautu 0.00 16
17 430 Rere Mataiti 1 Tautu 4,556.70 17
18 432 Rangatira Tuare 3 Tautu 14,333.30 18
19 442 Tapu Manapori 3 Tautu 24,381.80 19
20 447 Temata Tupakea 3 Tautu 22,900.50 20
21 440 Akateni Ioane 3 Tautu 32,767.30 21
22 451 Zekari William 4 Tautu 0.00 22
23 436 Teina Tekopua 1 Tautu 2,110.00 23
24 433 Arerau Mao 4 Tautu 0.00 24
25 471 Kairangi Ratai 3 Tautu 14,785.10 25
26 472 Ruau Teinangaro 4 Tautu 0.00 26
27 479 Pookotai Tepaki 4 Tautu 0.00 27
28 473 More Pita 4 Tautu 0.00 28
29 475 Paraia Pita 4 Tautu 0.00 29
30 478 Teariki George 1 Tautu 1,438.50 30
31 466 Peka Pareanga 3 Tautu 11,662.30 31
32 418 Tutere Strickland 1 Tautu 4,270.60 32
33 411 Willy Bond  2 Tautu 3,500.00 33
34 406 Mauke Mauke 1 Tautu 3,600.00 34
35 420 Berney Storr 1 Tautu 2,000.00 35
36 453 Tere Pita 1 Tautu 0.00 36
37 405 Desmond Clark 1 Tautu 0.00 37

Count 8 3 15 11 37
Total $ 18,024.80 15,182.00 276,776.80 0.00 309,983.60

UREIA BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 1172 Hosea Drollet 2 Ureia 10,661.31 1
2 1171 Arama Tera (M Katu) 2 Ureia 6,349.59 2
3 1159 Rino George 2 Ureia 11,278.19 3
4 1162 Tiki Manu 2 Ureia 8,498.05 4
5 1142 Teina George 2 Ureia 5,278.57 5
6 1138 Teremoana Nooroa 3 Ureia 14,970.45 6
7 1143 Josie Sadaraka 2 Ureia 6,778.48 7
8 1133 Ashin Ashin 2 Ureia 7,085.43 8
9 1128 Takake Ngatuakana 4 Ureia 0.00 9
10 1130 Jnr Manuela 2 Ureia 3,652.77 10
11 1140 Tara Ngataua 2 Ureia 2,718.32 11
12 1119 Kairangi Paora 3 Ureia 8,126.80 12
13 1118 Enua Manavakai 1 Ureia 10,994.34 13
14 1111 Bobby Bishop 2 Ureia 4,964.08 14
15 1097 Ngatuakana Ngatua 2 Ureia 4,886.31 15
16 1077 Tuariki Natu Katapu 2 Ureia 6,750.04 16
17 1079 Pani Ngatoe 4 Ureia 0.00 17
18 1023 Pan & Ake Tuakeu 2 Ureia 5,838.47 18
19 1020 George Titi 4 Ureia 0.00 19
20 1024 Arani Henry 4 Ureia 0.00 20
21 1083 Kaitai Tutai 2 Ureia 5,754.10 21
22 1021 Ngataua Puapii 2 Ureia 14,511.53 22
23 1025 Jessie Jessie 3 Ureia 10,373.55 23
24 1016 Bolton Paiti 2 Ureia 8,810.45 24
25 1011 Arona Tinirau 1 Ureia 3,398.73 25
26 1013 Tere Raea 2 Ureia 19,037.04 26
27 866 Tukua Upokomanu 2 Ureia 16,302.77 27
28 865 Steve Doughty 1 Ureia 2,292.40 28
29 1035 Maea Maea 3 Ureia 9,661.08 29
30 1110 Matakeu Tetera 3 Ureia 12,000.00 30
31 1106 Anna Nicholls 3 Ureia 12,000.00 31

Count 3 14 10 4 31
Total $ 16,685.47 90,493.71 125,793.67 0.00 232,972.85

VAIPAE BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 318 Pilato Mahitu 4 Vaipae 0.00 1
2 278 Taa Rere 3 Vaipae 20,503.20 2
3 321 Lucy Raea 1 Vaipae 3,884.00 3
4 300 Jason Temanu 1 Vaipae 3,983.70 4
5 302 Teinakore Manuela 4 Vaipae 0.00 5

SHEET 3
 APPENDIX B
DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

6 307 Puinui Marsters 2 Vaipae 5,356.76 6

7 291 Rangi Ngatokoa 3 Vaipae 10,286.80 7
8 296 Tuakura Tuakura 4 Vaipae 0.00 8
9 282 Pukenga Varu 3 Vaipae 12,647.70 9
10 286 Temata Ua 4 Vaipae 0.00 10
11 242 Matina Ioane 1 Vaipae 2,431.70 11
12 264 Kimiora Ponga 1 Vaipae 7,127.70 12
13 243 Arii Williams 4 Vaipae 0.00 13
14 236 Arere Tara 4 Vaipae 0.00 14
15 1285 Metua Terei 4 Vaipae 0.00 15
16 234 Tuakana Potini 1 Vaipae 2,111.50 16
17 179 Vainetutai Kureta 3 Vaipae 10,153.90 17
18 218 Terei George 4 Vaipae 0.00 18
19 210 Kopu Tumutoa 3 Vaipae 14,156.20 19
20 208 Davey Roa 1 Vaipae 2,792.30 20
21 225 Ta Maetu 3 Vaipae 14,357.90 21
22 223 Rongo Anau 1 Vaipae 4,636.30 22
23 212 Tau Eitiare 3 Vaipae 14,084.90 23
24 220 Tutai George 4 Vaipae 0.00 24
25 229 Taia Tearataia 3 Vaipae 10,076.70 25
26 200 Ioane Uri 4 Vaipae 0.00 26
27 183 Tuau Tuau 3 Vaipae 7,263.00 27
28 169 Rakau Teopu 4 Vaipae 0.00 28
29 168 Teokotai Teopu 4 Vaipae 0.00 29
30 230 Nia Heather 1 Vaipae 1,200.00 30
31 172 Jubilee Reu 2 Vaipae 642.00 31
32 237 Ngapoko Tiurai 4 Vaipae 0.00 32
33 245 Tuvaine Glassie 1 Vaipae 2,682.90 33
34 246 Marako Paoo 4 Vaipae 0.00 34
35 221 Noble John Pakoti 3 Vaipae 15,538.90 35
36 252 Eikura Terepai 3 Vaipae 15,252.10 36
37 247 Mii Daniel 4 Vaipae 0.00 37
38 248 Mataiti Rave Pitomaki 3 Vaipae 18,009.90 38
39 539 Tira Arere 1 Vaipae 4,822.50 39
40 1303 Tiraa Mare George 1 Vaipae 2,663.90 40
41 540 Enuake Tare 3 Vaipae 14,502.30 41
42 253 Anau Peter Monga 1 Vaipae 2,585.50 42
43 542 Tereapii Temanu 1 Vaipae 3,989.50 43
44 262 Ngatapati Iro 3 Vaipae 22,333.90 44
45 260 Tepaeru Ngatuakana 2 Vaipae 3,083.10 45
46 254 Mokoare Varu 1 Vaipae 2,315.00 46
47 547 Matamaru Nanai 4 Vaipae 0.00 47
48 548 Metuakore Tangi 1 Vaipae 4,018.50 48
49 550 Teina Tangi 1 Vaipae 5,799.22 49
50 170 Tai Rikiau 2 Vaipae 7,892.50 50
51 171 Tamarii Kaivananga 2 Vaipae 5,215.70 51
52 555 Charlie Arere 3 Vaipae 18,175.50 52
53 556 Tu Arona 4 Vaipae 0.00 53
54 553 Sara Daniel 4 Vaipae 0.00 54
55 215 Noo Tako 1 Vaipae 1,200.00 55
56 216 Tutai Antonia 1 Vaipae 1,200.00 56
57 295 Ake Namiro 1 Vaipae 1,200.00 57
58 209 Nga Rakau 1 Vaipae 1,200.00 58

Count 20 5 15 18 58
Total $ 61,844.22 22,190.06 217,342.90 0.00 301,377.18

VAIPEKA BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
MI_No. BLDG_ID OwnerName Category Village CAT 1 CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 Survey No.
1 153 Mama Lani Carl 3 Vaipeka 6,256.70 1
2 152 Tangi Eli 3 Vaipeka 12,392.50 2
3 143 Apiki John Marsters 2 Vaipeka 5,454.20 3
4 140 Tupuna Kamoe Metuatini 4 Vaipeka 0.00 4
5 131 Nooroa Aue 4 Vaipeka 0.00 5
6 126 Kamoe Tupoa 4 Vaipeka 0.00 6
7 121 Kitai Tapora 3 Vaipeka 9,309.30 7
8 1368 Katherine Henry 4 Vaipeka 0.00 8
9 1,323 E Lockington 4 Vaipeka 0.00 9

Count 0 1 3 5 9
Total $ 0.00 5,454.20 27,958.50 0.00 33,412.70

SHEET 4