Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
There are increased demands in recent years for improved reliability and sustainable efficiency of the mechanical
drive steam turbines for long-term continuous operation of machines used in petrochemical plants for ethylene,
ammonia, etc. from the standpoint of energy saving and maintenance cost reduction. This paper introduces: (1)
high-reliability thrust bearings for high speed and high load condition, (2) the technology for preventing the solid
particle erosion of speed-control stage nozzle caused by scales from boiler, (3) the technology for preventing the drain
erosion of low-pressure stage blade caused by collision with the waterdrops contained in wet steam, and (4) the
technology for improving reliability through application of fouling removal technology to the actual machine in order
to improve the deterioration of efficiency during long-term operation.
Coating technology
(last stage blade)
Fig. 1 MHI turbine and compressor Fig. 2 Section drawing with applying of new technologies
Top leveler
Oil flood type Rotra
(conventional)
Reduction of loss
by stirring Contact friction: Small
B
Drain hole B-B (line contact)
T ( C)
100 Tmet: Metal temperature 100 : N=8 000 rpm Pmax: Maximum pad load
Tin: Supply oil Reduction
temperature : Improved leveler
of metal
Metal temperature rise
: Conventional leveler
temperature
0.5
Reduction of Capability improved
50 50
wear loss Operating range
0 0.1 0.2
0 5 000 10 000 0 5 000 10 000 Angle of inclination (de )
Output (kW) Output (kW) Fig. 6 Leveling capability compared
Fig. 4 Comparison of bearing metal temperatures
Calculating conditions
Temperature reducing effect SPEED: N=11300 rpm
: Maximum metal temperature
metal temperature ( C)
120
LOAD: W=4 800 k f
Calculated value of
(calculated value) ( C)
120
o
o
100 10-15 C Temperature OFF SET: e=100 X
Metal temperature
o
110 reduced L
80
60 100 L/2 L/2
90
40 P=20 k f/cm2
: STEEL 80
20 : Chromium-copper P=20 k f/cm2
70
0
2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 60
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Rotational speed (rpm)
Offset ratio e (%) Pad Pivot
Fig. 7 Back metal material compared
Fig. 8 Offset ratio compared
Silver brazing
PTA stellite cladding (conventional technique)
Solid particle
Item Drain erosion
erosion
Stellite plate
Temperature
High Low
condition
. Plasma spraying
Coating . Boronizing . Stellite plate sticking
technology . Plasma spraying by silver alloy brazing
. PTA stellite cladding
Applied section Nozzle Blade
Stellite section Silver brazing
Fig. 9 Erosion prevention
After welding Completed product Completed product
Fig. 10 Stellite appearance compared
..
ing to ASTM G32-77 (environment: ion-exchange water, ods and characteristics as given below.
temperature: room temperature, test frequency: 18.3 (1) Treating methods
kHz, test-piece end amplitude: 25 u m) and compared Formation of high-hardness boron alloy layer (Fe2B)
..
with silver brazing, indicating that the PTA has the ero- Penetrated diffusion treatment
sion resistance equivalent to that of silver brazing. (2) Characteristics
Fig
Fig.. 12 shows the fatigue strength of PTA evaluated Ensures boron alloy layer of hardness Hv 1200 - 1800
.
by using Ono-type rotating bending fatigue test (envi- High hardness at high temperature and excellent
ronment: atmosphere, temperature: room temperature, hardwearing properties at high temperature
.
frequency: 60 Hz) and compared with silver brazing, in- High break away resistance because of penetration into
dicating that PTA has excellent fatigue strength the base metal
characteristics while silver brazing has the fatigue Thin layer (approximately 80 u m) of boron alloy
strength reduced approximately to half of the base metal. Fig. 13 shows the mechanism of nozzle wear damage.
In view of the aforesaid points, the protected area The scale is generated and grows into the inner sur-
(stellite section) in conventional method was limited to face of the boiler tube due to steam oxidation; the
the blade tip. In the case of PTA, however, since the fa- enlarged scale then gets break away because of the weak-
tigue strength equivalent to that of the base metal can ening of its adherence to the base metal of the tube at
be obtained, the welding is possible up to the central the time of start/stop of the plant before finding its way
portion of the blade. Thus, with the protected area ex- into the turbine.
panded, application of PTA is expected to get expanded Since the flow direction while passing through the
to strict erosive environment. Further, the stellite plate nozzle profile gets sharply changed, the scale with larger
had problems such as difficulty in molding and neces- specific gravity fails to catch up with the steam flow be-
sity of manual work, whereas in the case of PTA, the cause of the effect of inertia and gets collided with the
welding is carried out mechanically, bringing about con- nozzle profile, causing wear damage. This is what we
siderable improvement in quality and yield. call solid particle erosion. Particularly the speed-control
3.2 Boronizing stage nozzles installed at the inlet of the turbine have
The boronize treatment applied to the actual machine larger damage.
as a technology to prevent particle erosion on speed-con- Fig. 14 shows the test results of resistance to solid
0
: Base metal
: Base metal only : Stellite plate sticking by silver alloy brazing
Weight loss (m )
-0.5
: Stellite plate sticking by silver alloy brazing 1.2 : PTA stellite cladding
-1 : PTA stellite cladding Fatigue limit of base metal
stress amplitude
1.0
Dimensionless
-1.5 0.8
-2 0.6
Improved
0.4
-2.5 Silver brazing
0.2
(conventional technique)
-3 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 105 106 107
Test time (Hr) Number of cycles
Fig. 11 Erosion resistance Fig. 12 Fatigue strength
Nozzle profile 0
Reduction of
thickness loss
Dimensionless
Damage -0.5
weight loss
Boronize
-1 treatment
Wear degree
dicating that the wear loss of the nozzle subjected to : Base metal only
boronizing is extremely less than that of the nozzle with- : Boronize treatment
out boronize treatment. For example, the wear loss of
the nozzle subjected to boronizing after a 10-hour test is
approximately one-tenth of the nozzle without boronize Erosion
Operating time
treatment.
Fig. 15 shows the appearance of the actual speed-con-
trol stage nozzle subjected to boronizing compared with
the appearance of the nozzle without boronize treatment.
Base metal only (without treatment) Boronize treatment
The damage is clearly visible at the outlet end of the
nozzle without boronize treatment, which is not seen in Fig. 15 Appearance of speed-control stage nozzle compared