ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.

com™

Tweet Share Share

Search
Tweet

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2017 > August 2017 Decisions > G.R. No. 189942, August 09,
2017 - ADTEL, INC. AND/OR REYNALDO T. CASAS, Petitioners, v. MARIJOY A. VALDEZ, Respondent.:

Custom Search Search

G.R. No. 189942, August 09, 2017 - ADTEL, INC. AND/OR REYNALDO T. CASAS, Petitioners, v. MARIJOY
A. VALDEZ, Respondent.

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

SECOND DIVISION

G.R. No. 189942, August 09, 2017

ADTEL, INC. AND/OR REYNALDO T. CASAS, Petitioners, v. MARIJOY A. VALDEZ, Respondent.

RESOLUTION

CARPIO, J.:

The Case

Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari1 assailing the 28 May 2009 Resolution2 and the 8
October 2009 Resolution3 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 108169.

The Facts

DebtKollect Company, Inc.
Adtel, Inc. (Adtel) is a domestic corporation engaged in the distribution of telephone units, gadgets,
equipment, and allied products. On 9 September 1996, Adtel hired Marijoy A. Valdez (respondent) to
work as an accountant for the company. Adtel promoted respondent as the company's purchasing and
logistics supervisor.4 Adtel then entered into a dealership agreement with respondent's husband, Angel
Valdez (Mr. Valdez), to distribute Adtel's wideband VHF-UHF television antennas. The dealership
agreement was for twelve (12) months and the agreement was extended for another three (3) months.5
On 3 February 2006, Mr. Valdez filed a civil case against Adtel for specific performance and damages for
the execution of the terms of the dealership agreement.6 On 10 May 2006, Mr. Valdez also instituted a
criminal complaint for libel against Adtel's chairman, president, and officers.7

On 22 May 2006, Adtel issued a memorandum8 directing respondent to show cause in writing why she

ChanRobles Intellectual Property
Division
August-2017 Jurisprudence
G.R. No. 187160, August 09, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ERLINDA A. SISON @
"MARGARITA S. AGUILAR," Appellant.
G.R. No. 220002, August 02, 2017 - EUGENIO M.
GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. CROSSWORLD MARINE
SERVICES, INC., GOLDEN SHIPPING COMPANY S.A.,
AND ELEAZAR DIAZ, Respondents.
G.R. No. 185597, August 02, 2017 - JOHN E.R.
REYES AND MERWIN JOSEPH REYES, Petitioners, v.
ORICO DOCTOLERO, ROMEO AVILA, GRANDEUR
SECURITY AND SERVICES CORPORATION, AND
MAKATI CINEMA SQUARE, Respondents.
G.R. No. 188307, August 02, 2017 -
MULTINATIONAL VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS'
ASSOCIATION, INC., RAMON MAGBOO, JIMMY DEL
MUNDO, CARLOS RAPAY, AND DR. JOSEFINA
TIOPIANCO, PETITIONERS, VS. ARNEL M. GACUTAN,
RAFAEL TEYLAN, EDMUND T. HERNANDEZ, DANILO
ARANETA, MIGUEL DAVID, JOLIE R. PELAYO, BOBBY
D. YUTADCO, DANIEL TENORIO, MICHAEL KHO, AND
DANILO CAMBEL, Respondents.
G.R. No. 217777, August 16, 2017 - PRISCILLA Z.
ORBE, Petitioner, v. LEONORA O. MIARAL,
Respondent.
G.R. Nos. 144760-61, August 02, 2017 - EVELYN L.
MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN AND THE
OMBUDSMAN, Respondents.; G.R. Nos. 167311-12 -
EVELYN L. MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN
AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondents.; G.R. Nos. 167316-17 - VENANCIO R.
NAVA, Petitioner, v. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN 4TH
DIVISION AND THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondents.; G.R. Nos. 167625-26 - PRIMO C.
OBENZA, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN AND THE
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents.
A.C. No. 11149 (Formerly CBD Case No. 13-3709),
should not be terminated for conflict of interest and/or serious breach of trust and confidence.9 The
memorandum stated that the filing of cases by respondent's husband created a conflict of interest since
respondent had access to vital information that can be used against Adtel.10 Respondent was placed
under preventive suspension by Adtel. On 23 May 2006, respondent denied the charges of Adtel.
Respondent contended that the cases had nothing to do with her being an employee of Adtel and had not
affected her performance in the company.11
On 29 May 2006, Adtel terminated respondent from the company. Respondent filed a complaint for illegal
dismissal with the Labor Arbiter. In her Position Paper,12 respondent alleged that she did not violate any
company rule or policy; neither was she guilty of fraud, nor willful breach of trust. Respondent contended
that she was illegally dismissed without just cause and was entitled to separation pay, backwages, and
damages.
The Decision of the Labor Arbiter
In a Decision13 dated 24 May 2007, the Labor Arbiter dismissed respondent's complaint for illegal
dismissal. The Labor Arbiter found that there existed a conflict of interest between respondent and Adtel.
The Labor Arbiter ruled that respondent was not an ordinary rank-and-file employee but a managerial
employee with a fiduciary duty to protect the interest of Adtel. The Labor Arbiter held that the civil and
criminal cases initiated by respondent's husband indubitably created a conflict of interest that was a just
cause for her dismissal by Adtel.
The dispositive portion of the Labor Arbiter's decision reads: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered DISMISSING the instant
complaint for utter lack of merit.
SO ORDERED.14
The Decision of the National Labor Relations Commission
In a Decision15 dated 21 May 2008, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed the
decision of the Labor Arbiter. The NLRC ruled that Adtel illegally dismissed respondent. The NLRC held
that Adtel failed to substantially prove the existence of an act or omission personally attributable to the
respondent to serve as a just cause to terminate her employment.
The dispositive portion of the NLRC's decision states: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, the appeal is GRANTED and the assailed Decision is hereby REVERSED and
SET ASIDE. A new one is hereby rendered ordering the respondent company to pay to the
complainant the following amounts:
1. P283,000.00 - representing her separation pay for her almost ten years of service to the
company;
2. P684,600.58 - representing her backwages from May 29, 2006 up to the date of this
Decision;
Plus ten percent (10%) of the total monetary awards, as and for attorney's fees.
Other claims and charges are dismissed for lack of merit.
SO ORDERED.16
Adtel filed a Motion for Reconsideration which was denied by the NLRC on 24 December 2008. Adtel
received the NLRC Resolution on 5 February 2009. On 7 April 2009, the last day for filing its petition for
certiorari with the CA, Adtel filed a motion for extension of time with the CA. On 22 April 2009, fifteen
(15) days after the last day for filing or the 75th day, Adtel filed its petition for certiorari with the CA.17
The Decision of the CA
On 28 May 2009, the CA denied the motion for extension and dismissed Adtel's petition for certiorari for
being filed beyond the reglementary period. The CA ruled that Adtel had until 7 April 2009 to file its
petition for certiorari. Instead of filing the petition for certiorari, Adtel filed a motion for extension of time
on 7 April 2009 and subsequently filed its petition for certiorari on 22 April 2009, the last day of the
extended period prayed for by Adtel. The CA held that the reglementary period to file a petition for
certiorari can no.longer be extended pursuant to A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC which amended Section 4, Rule 65
of the Rules of Court.18
The dispositive portion of the CA's Resolution states: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, the Motion is DENIED. Instead, the petition is DISMISSED for being filed
beyond the reglementary period.
SO ORDERED.19
Adtel filed a motion for reconsideration which was denied on 8 October 2009.20
The Issues
Adtel presented the following issues in this petition: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
A. The Court of Appeals committed a reversible error in denying the petitioners' motion for
reconsideration and in dismissing the petition for certiorari on the sole basis of technicality.
B. Technicalities should give way to a judgment on the merits considering that the Labor
Arbiter justly and correctly ruled that the complaint for illegal dismissal against petitioner
was baseless and unmeritorious only to be later reversed by the NLRC upon respondent's
appeal.21
The Decision of this Court
We deny the petition.
A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC which amended Section 4, Rule 65 of the Rules of Court states: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
Sec. 4. When and where to file the petition. — The petition shall be filed not later than
sixty (60) days from notice of the judgment, order or resolution. In case a motion for
August 15, 2017 - LAURENCE D. PUNLA AND
MARILYN SANTOS, Complainants, v. ATTY. ELEONOR
MARAVILLA-ONA, Respondent.
A.M. No. RTJ-10-2219, August 01, 2017 - OFFICE
OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v.
RETIRED JUDGE PABLO R. CHAVEZ, FORMER
PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS, ATTY. TEOFILO A.
DIMACULANGAN, JR., CLERK OF COURT VI, MR.
ARMANDO ERMELITO M. MARQUEZ, COURT
INTERPRETER III, MS. EDITHA E. BAGSIC, COURT
INTERPRETER III, AND MR. DAVID CAGUIMBAL,
PROCESS SERVER, ALL OF REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS, Respondents.;
A.M. No. 12-7-130-RTC - RE: UNDATED ANONYMOUS
LETTER-COMPLAINT AGAINST THE PRESIDING
JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT AND COURT
STENOGRAPHER OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS.
G.R. No. 186050, August 01, 2017 - ARTHUR
BALAO, WINSTON BALAO, NONETTE BALAO, JONILYN
BALAO-STRUGAR, AND BEVERLY LONGID, Petitioners,
v. EDUARDO ERMITA, GILBERTO TEODORO, RONALDO
PUNO, NORBERTO GONZALES, GEN. ALEXANDER
YANO, GEN. JESUS VERZOSA, BRIG. GEN. REYNALDO
MAPAGU, LT. P/DIR. EDGARDO DOROMAL, MAJ. GEN.
ISAGANI CACHUELA, COMMANDING OFFICER OF THE
AFP-ISU BASED IN BAGUIO CITY, PSS EUGENE
MARTIN, AND SEVERAL JOHN DOES, Respondents.;
G.R. No. 186059 - SECRETARY EDUARDO
ERMITA,SECRETARY GILBERTOTEODORO,SECRETARY
RONALDOPUNO,SECRETARY NORBERTOGONZALES,
GEN. ALEXANDER YANO, P/DGEN. JESUS VERZOSA,
BRIG. GEN. REYNALDO MAPAGU, MAJ. GEN. ISAGANI
CACHUELA, AND POL. SR. SUPT. EUGENE MARTIN,
Petitioners, v. ARTHUR BALAO, WINSTON BALAO,
NONETTE BALAO, JONILYN BALAO-STRUGAR, AND
BEVERLY LONGID, Respondents.
A.C. No. 11504, August 01, 2017 - ARIEL G.
PALACIOS, FOR AND IN BEHALF OF THE AFP
RETIREMENT AND SEPARATION BENEFITS SYSTEM
(AFP-RSBS), Complainant, v. ATTY. BIENVENIDO
BRAULIO M. AMORA, JR., Respondent.
G.R. No. 221493, August 02, 2017 - STERLING
PAPER PRODUCTS ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v.
KMM-KATIPUNAN AND RAYMOND Z. ESPONGA,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 222095, August 07, 2017 - IN THE MATTER
OF PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF CERTIFICATES
OF LIVE BIRTH OF YUHARES JAN BARCELOTE
TINITIGAN AND AVEE KYNNA NOELLE BARCELOTE
TINITIGAN - JONNA KARLA BAGUIO BARCELOTE,
Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, RICKY
O. TINITIGAN, AND LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRAR, DAVAO
CITY, Respondents.
G.R. No. 216161, August 09, 2017 -
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v. PHILIPPINE ALUMINUM WHEELS, INC.,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 189942, August 09, 2017 - ADTEL, INC.
AND/OR REYNALDO T. CASAS, Petitioners, v.
MARIJOY A. VALDEZ, Respondent.
G.R. No. 228887, August 02, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOMINADOR
UDTOHAN Y JOSE, Accused-Appellant.
G.R. No. 215999, August 16, 2017 - SPS. FELIX A.
CHUA AND CARMEN L. CHUA, JAMES B. HERRERA,
EDUARDO L. ALMENDRAS, MILA NG ROXAS, EUGENE
C. LEE, EDICER H. ALMENDRAS, BENEDICT C. LEE,
LOURDES C. NG, LUCENA INDUSTRIAL
CORPORATION, LUCENA GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL,
INC., REPRESENTED BY FELIX A. CHUA, Petitioners, v.
UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS BANK, ASSET POOL A
(SPV-AMC), REVERE REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, JOSE C. GO AND THE REGISTRAR OF
DEEDS OF LUCENA CITY, Respondents.
G.R. No. 224302, August 08, 2017 - HON. PHILIP A.
AGUINALDO, HON. REYNALDO A. ALHAMBRA, HON.
DANILO S. CRUZ, HON. BENJAMIN T. POZON, HON.
SALVADOR V. TIMBANG, JR., and the INTEGRATED
BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES (IBP), Petitioners, v. HIS
EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT BENIGNO SIMEON C.
AQUINO III, HON. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUITO
N. OCHOA, HON. MICHAEL FREDERICK L. MUSNGI,
HON. MA. GERALDINE FAITH A. ECONG, HON. DANILO
S. SANDOVAL, HON. WILHELMINA B. JORGE-WAGAN,
HON. ROSANA FE ROMERO-MAGLAYA, HON.
MERIANTHE PACITA M. ZURAEK, HON. ELMO M.
ALAMEDA, and HON. VICTORIA C. FERNANDEZ-
BERNARDO, Respondents.; JUDICIAL AND BAR
COUNCIL, Intervenor.
A.C. No. 10562, August 01, 2017 - JEAN MARIE S.
BOERS, Complainant, v. ATTY. ROMEO CALUBAQUIB,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 226345, August 02, 2017 - PIONEER
reconsideration or new trial is timely filed, whether such motion is required or not, the
petition shall be filed not later than sixty (60) days counted from the notice of the denial of
the motion.
If the petition relates to an act or an omission of a municipal trial court or of a corporation,
a board, an officer or a person, it shall be filed with the Regional Trial Court exercising
jurisdiction over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also be filed
with the Court of Appeals or with the Sandiganbayan, whether or not the same is in aid of
the court's appellate jurisdiction. If the petition involves an act or an omission of a quasi-
judicial agency, unless otherwise provided by law or these rules, the petition shall be filed
with and be cognizable only by the Court of Appeals.
In election cases involving an act or an omission of a municipal or a regional trial court,
the petition shall be filed exclusively with the Commission on Elections, in aid of its
appellate jurisdiction.
A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC states that in cases where a motion for reconsideration was timely filed, the filing of
a petition for certiorari questioning the resolution denying the motion for reconsideration must be made
not later than sixty (60) days from the notice of the denial of the motion. In Laguna Metts
Corporation v. Court of Appeals,22 this Court held that following A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, petitions for
certiorari must be filed strictly within 60 days from the notice of judgment or from the order denying a
motion for reconsideration. In Laguna Metts Corporation, this Court stated the rationale for the strict
observance of the 60-day period to file a petition for certiorari, to wit: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
The 60-day period is deemed reasonable and sufficient time for a party to mull over and to
prepare a petition asserting grave abuse of discretion by a lower court. The period was
specifically set to avoid any unreasonable delay that would violate the constitutional rights
of the parties to a speedy disposition of their case.23
In Laguna Metts Corporation, this Court ruled that the 60-day period was non-extendible and the CA no
longer had the authority to grant the motion for extension in view of A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC which
amended Section 4 of Rule 65.
However, in Domdom v. Third and Fifth Divisions of the Sandiganbayan24 this Court held that the strict
observance of the 60-day period to file a petition for certiorari is not absolute. This Court ruled that
absent any express prohibition under Rule 65, a motion for extension is still permitted, subject to the
Court's sound discretion. Similarly, in Labao v. Flores,25 this Court recognized that the extension of the
60-day period may be granted by the Court in the presence of special or compelling circumstances
provided that there should be an effort on the part of the party invoking liberality to advance a
reasonable or meritorious explanation for his or her failure to comply with the rules. Likewise, in Mid-
Islands Power Generation v. Court of Appeals26 this Court held that a motion for extension was allowed
in petitions for certiorari under Rule 65 subject to the Court's sound discretion and only under
exceptional or meritorious cases.
The exception to the 60-day rule to file a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 was also applied by this
Court in a more recent case in Republic of the Philippines v. St. Vincent de Paul Colleges, Inc.,27 to wit: "
[u]nder exceptional circumstances, however, and subject to the sound discretion of the Court, [the] said
period may be extended pursuant to [the] Domdom, Labao and Mid-Islands Power cases."28
Therefore, the rule is that in filing petitions for certiorari under Rule 65, a motion for
extension is a prohibited pleading. However in exceptional or meritorious cases, the Court
may grant an extension anchored on special or compelling reasons.
Adtel's motion for extension filed with the CA on 7 April 2009 reads: chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR CERTIORARI
1. Petitioner's Petition for Certiorari was due for filing yesterday, 06 April 2009 or sixty (60)
days from 05 February 2009, the date of receipt of the Resolution dated 24 December
2008 issued by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). Considering that
yesterday was a holiday, the petition in effect is due today, 07 April 2009.
2. While a draft of the pleading had already been prepared, final revisions have yet to be
completed. However, due to the undersigned counsel's heavy volume of work,
petitioner is constrained to request for an additional period of fifteen (15) days
from today or up to 22 April 2009 within which to file the Petition for Certiorari.
3. This motion is not intended to delay the proceedings but is prompted solely by the
above-stated reason.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, petitioner respectfully prays for an extension of fifteen (15) days from 07
April 2009 or up to 22 April 2009 within which to file its Petition for Certiorari.
Petitioner prays for such other relief which may be deemed just and equitable under the
circumstances.29 (Boldfacing and underscoring supplied)
In Yutingco v. Court of Appeals,30 this Court held that the circumstance of heavy workload alone,
absent a compelling or special reason, is not a sufficient justification to allow an extension of the 60-day
period to file a petition for certiorari, to wit:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
Heavy workload, which is relative and often self serving, ought to be coupled with more
compelling reasons such as illness of counsel or other emergencies that could be
substantiated by affidavits of merit. Standing alone, heavy workload is not sufficient
reason to deviate from the 60-day rule. Thus, we are constrained to state that the Court of
Appeals did not err in dismissing the petition for having been filed late.31
In Thenamaris Philippines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals,32 this Court held that the heavy workload of counsel
is hardly a compelling or meritorious reason for availing a motion for extension of time to file a petition
for certiorari. Similarly, in Mid-Islands Power, this Court ruled that the heavy workload and the
resignation of the lawyer handling the case are insufficient reasons to justify the relaxation of the
procedural rules under Rule 65. In both Thenamaris and Mid-Islands Power, this Court denied the
motions for extension of time to file a petition for certiorari and held that the heavy workload of counsel
was not a compelling reason contemplated by the Rules of Court.
As previously stated in Labao,33 there should be an effort on the part of the party invoking liberality to
advance a reasonable or meritorious explanation for his or her failure to comply with Rule 65.
INSURANCE AND SURETY CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v. APL CO. PTE. LTD., Respondent.
G.R. No. 211966, August 07, 2017 - JOSE AUDIE
ABAGATNAN, JOSEPHINE A. PARCE, JIMMY
ABAGATNAN, JOHN ABAGATNAN, JENALYN A. DE
LEON, JOEY ABAGATNAN, JOJIE ABAGATNAN, AND
JOY ABAGATNAN, Petitioners, v. SPOUSES JONATHAN
CLARITO AND ELSA CLARITO, Respondents.
Accordingly, in the absence of a more compelling reason cited in the motion for extension of time other
than the "undersigned counsel's heavy volume of work," the CA did not commit a reversible error in
dismissing the petition for certiorari.
WHEREFORE, we DENY the petition. We AFFIRM the Resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated 28 May
2009 and 8 October 2009 in CA-G.R. SP No. 108169.
SO ORDERED.

G.R. No. 206468, August 02, 2017 - JUDITH D. Peralta, Mendoza, Leonen, and Martires, JJ., concur.
DARINES AND JOYCE D. DARINES, Petitioners, v.
EDUARDO QUIÑONES AND ROLANDO QUITAN,
Respondents. Endnotes:

G.R. No. 185559, August 02, 2017 - JOSE G. TAN

AND ORENCIO C. LUZURIAGA, Petitioners, v. ROMEO 1Rollo, pp. 6-27. Under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.
H. VALERIANO, Respondent.
2 Id. at 34-35. Penned by Associate Justice Mariflor P. Punzalan Castillo, with Associate
G.R. No. 217993, August 09, 2017 - MANUEL R.
Justices Rosmari D. Carandang and Marlene Gonzales-Sison concurring.
BAKUNAWA III, Petitioner, v. NORA REYES
BAKUNAWA, Respondent.
3 Id. at 29-31. Penned by Associate Justice Mariflor P. Punzalan Castillo, with Associate
A.M. No. P-09-2649 [Formerly A.M. No. 09-5-219- Justices Rosmari D. Carandang and Marlene Gonzales-Sison concurring.
RTC], August 01, 2017 - OFFICE OF THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v. EDUARDO T. 4 Id. at 135.
UMBLAS, LEGAL RESEARCHER, AND ATTY. RIZALINA
G. BALTAZAR​AQUINO, CLERK OF COURT IV, BOTH OF 5
THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 33, Id.
BALLESTEROS CAGAYAN, Respondents.
6 Id.
G.R. No. 227309, August 16, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOCELYN CARLIT 7 Id. at 136.
Y GAWAT, Accused-Appellant.
8 Id. at 69-70.
G.R. No. 216491, August 23, 2017 - THE HEIRS OF
PETER DONTON, THROUGH THEIR LEGAL
9 Id. at 136.
REPRESENTATIVE, FELIPE G. CAPULONG, Petitioners,
v. DUANE STIER AND EMILY MAGGAY, Respondents.
10 Id.
G.R. No. 222711, August 23, 2017 - LEY
CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 11
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, JANET C. LEY, Id.
Petitioner, v. MARVIN MEDEL SEDANO, DOING
12 Id. at 75-90.
BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE "LOLA TABA
LOLO PATO PALENGKE AT PALUTO SA SEASIDE,"
Respondent.; MARVIN MEDEL SEDANO, DOING 13 Id. at 91 -101. Penned by Labor Arbiter Fatima Jambaro-Franco.
BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE "LOLA TABA
LOLO PATO PALENGKE AT PALUTO SA SEASIDE," 14
Respondent (THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF), VS. Id. at 101.
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION
15 Id at 135-144.
CORPORATION, Respondent (THIRD-PARTY
DEFENDANT).
16 Id. at 143.
G.R. No. 222561, August 30, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JONATHAN TICA 17
Y EPANTO, Accused-Appellant. Id. at 34.

18 Id.
G.R. No. 187257, August 08, 2017 - REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICE OF
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL (OSG) AS THE PEOPLE'S 19 Id. at 35.
TRIBUNE, AND THE NATIONAL POWER BOARD,
Petitioners, v. HON. LUISITO G. CORTEZ, PRESIDING 20
JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 84, Id. at 13.
QUEZON CITY, ABNER P. ELERIA, MELITO B.
21 Id.
LUPANGCO, NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES CONSOLIDATED
UNION (NECU), AND NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES AND
WORKERS UNION (NEWU), Respondents.; G.R. No. 22 611 Phil. 530 (2009).
187776 - ROLANDO G. ANDAYA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUDGET AND 23
MANAGEMENT AND MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF Id. at 535, citing De Los Santos v. Court of Appeals, 522 Phil. 313 (2006).
DIRECTORS OF THE NATIONAL POWER
24 627 Phil. 341 (2010).
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. HON. LUISITO G.
CORTEZ, PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, BRANCH 84, QUEZON CITY, ABNER P. ELERIA, 25 649 Phil. 213 (2010).
MELITO B. LUPANGCO, NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES
CONSOLIDATED UNION AND NAPOCOR EMPLOYEES 26
AND WORKERS UNION, Respondents. 683 Phil. 325 (2012).

27 693 Phil. 145 (2012).

A.M. No. RTJ-10-2223 (Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No.
08-3003-RTJ), August 30, 2017 - MS. FLORITA
PALMA AND MS. FILIPINA MERCADO, Complainants, 28 Id. at 156-157.
v. JUDGE GEORGE E. OMELIO, REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, BR. 14, DAVAO CITY (THEN OF MUNICIPAL 29Rollo,
TRIAL COURT IN CITIES, BR.4, DAVAO CITY), JUDGE pp. 161-162.
VIRGILIO G. MURCIA, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN
30 435 Phil. 83 (2002).
CITIES, BR. 2, AND CLERK OF COURT MA. FLORIDA C.
OMELIO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT, BOTH OF THE 31 Id. at 92.
ISLAND GARDEN CITY OF SAMAL, Respondents.
32 725 Phil. 590 (2014).
G.R. No. 178379, August 22, 2017 - CRISPIN S.
FRONDOZO,* DANILO M. PEREZ, JOSE A. ZAFRA,
33 Supra note 25.
ARTURO B. VITO, CESAR S. CRUZ, NAZARIO C. DELA
CRUZ, AND LUISITO R. DILOY, Petitioners, v. MANILA
ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent.

A.C. No. 11616 [Formerly CBD Case No. 08-2141],

August 23, 2017 - LITO V. BUENVIAJE, Complainant,
v. ATTY. MELCHOR G. MAGDAMO, Respondent. Back to Home | Back to Main

A.C. No. 6980, August 30, 2017 - CESAR O. STA.

ANA, CRISTINA M. STA. ANA AND ESTHER STA. ANA-
SILVERIO, Complainants, v. ATTY. ANTONIO JOSE F. QUICK SEARCH
CORTES, Respondent.

A.C. No. 7253, August 29, 2017 - ATTY. PLARIDEL

C. NAVA II, Complainant, v. PROSECUTOR OFELIA M. 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
D. ARTUZ,* Respondent.; A.M. No. MTJ-08-1717]
(FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 07-1911-MTJ) - ATTY. 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
PLARIDEL C. NAVA II, Complainant, v. JUDGE OFELIA 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
M. D. ARTUZ, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES OF
ILOILO CITY, BRANCH 5, Respondent. 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
A.C. No. 10253, August 22, 2017 - RAFAEL
PADILLA, Complainant, v. ATTY. GLENN SAMSON, 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
Respondent. 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
G.R. No. 198146, August 08, 2017 - POWER SECTOR 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL, Respondent. 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
G.R. No. 225442, August 08, 2017 - SAMAHAN NG
MGA PROGRESIBONG KABATAAN (SPARK), JOANNE 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
ROSE SACE LIM, JOHN ARVIN NAVARRO BUENAAGUA, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
RONEL BACCUTAN, MARK LEO DELOS REYES, AND
CLARISSA JOYCE VILLEGAS, MINOR, FOR HERSELF 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
AND AS REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER, JULIAN 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
VILLEGAS, JR., Petitioners, v. QUEZON CITY, AS
REPRESENTED BY MAYOR HERBERT BAUTISTA, CITY
OF MANILA, AS REPRESENTED BY MAYOR JOSEPH
ESTRADA, AND NAVOTAS CITY, AS REPRESENTED BY
MAYOR JOHN REY TIANGCO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 190004, August 08, 2017 - LAND BANK OF Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. EUGENIO DALAUTA,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 218911, August 23, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEONARDO
SIAPNO, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 221732, August 23, 2017 - FERNANDO U.

JUAN, Petitioner, v. ROBERTO U. JUAN (SUBSTITUTED
BY HIS SON JEFFREY C. JUAN) AND LAUNDROMATIC
CORPORATION, Respondents.

G.R. No. 222821, August 09, 2017 - NORTH

GREENHILLS ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, v. ATTY.
NARCISO MORALES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 227878, August 09, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERALDO
SANTILLAN Y VILLANUEVA AND EUGENE BORROMEO
Y NATIVIDAD, Accused-Appellants.

G.R. No. 211222, August 07, 2017 - ALLAN S. CU,

Petitioner, v. SMALL BUSINESS GUARANTEE AND
FINANCE CORPORATION THROUGH MR. HECTOR M.
OLMEDILLO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 186329, August 02, 2017 - DR. FRISCO M.

MALABANAN, Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN,
Respondent.; G.R. Nos. 186584-86, August 2, 2017 -
ABUSAMA MANGUDADATU ALID, Petitioner, v. THE
HON. SANDIGANBAYAN - 1st DIVISION, OFFICE OF
THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, HON. SECRETARY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondents.; G.R.
No. 198598, August 2, 2017 - ABUSAMA M. ALID,
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 223366, August 01, 2017 - NATIONAL

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v.
OROVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 226679, August 15, 2017 - SALVADOR

ESTIPONA, JR. Y ASUELA, Petitioner, v. HON. FRANK
E. LOBRIGO, PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 3, LEGAZPI CITY, ALBAY, AND
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 219500, August 09, 2017 - MAMERTO DY,

Petitioner, v. MARIA LOURDES ROSELL ALDEA,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 217965, August 08, 2017 -

CONFEDERATION OF COCONUT FARMERS
ORGANIZATIONS OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC.
(CCFOP), Petitioner, v. HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT
BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, ACTING
COMMISSIONER RICHARD ROGER AMURAO OF THE
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD
GOVERNMENT (PCGG), CHAIRMAN CESAR L.
VILLANUEVA OF THE GOVERNANCE COMMISSION
FOR GOCCS (GCG), AND SECRETARY LEILA M. DE
LIMA OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondents.

A.M. No. MTJ-17-1900 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 13-

2585-MTJ], August 09, 2017 - ARNEL MENDOZA,
Complainant, v. HON. MARCOS C. DIASEN, JR.,
ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE, METROPOLITAN TRIAL
COURT, BR. 62, MAKATI CITY, Respondent.

G.R. No. 217764, August 07, 2017 - ANTONIETA

LUCIDO @ TONYAY, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

A.M. No. P-16-3424 [Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 11-

3666-P], August 07, 2017 - GLORIA SERDONCILLO,
Complainant, v. SHERIFF NESTOR M. LANZADERAS,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 37, GENERAL
SANTOS CITY, Respondent.

G.R. No. 199710, August 02, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PO3 JULIETO
BORJA, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 228248, August 09, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROMEO DE
GUZMAN Y DE CASTRO, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 228894, August 07, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN PAUL
CERALDE Y RAMOS, Accused-Appellant.

A.C. No. 8903, August 30, 2017 - EDIGARDO V.

BONDOC, Complainant, v. ATTY. OLIMPIO R. DATU,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 201665, August 30, 2017 - EDISON

(BATAAN) COGENERATION CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, Respondent.; G.R. No. 201668, August 30,
2017 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES,
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, Petitioner, v. EDISON (BATAAN)
COGENERATION CORPORATION, Respondent.

A.C. No. 10245, August 16, 2017 - ELIBENA A.

CABILES, Complainant, v. ATTY. LEANDRO S. CEDO,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 188144, August 30, 2017 - F.F. CRUZ &

COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE IRON
CONSTRUCTION AND MARINE WORKS, INC., AND/OR
ANCHOR METALS CORP., Respondents.; G.R. NO.
188301 - PHILIPPINE IRON CONSTRUCTION AND
MARINE WORKS, INC., AND/OR ANCHOR METALS
CORP., Petitioners, v. F.F. CRUZ & COMPANY, INC.,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 201806, August 14, 2017 - NORTH SEA

MARINE SERVICES CORPORATION, MS. ROSALINDA
CERDINA AND/OR CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES,
Petitioners, v. SANTIAGO S. ENRIQUEZ, Respondent.

G.R. No. 210209, August 09, 2017 - CATHAY LAND,

INC. AND CATHAY METAL CORPORATION, Petitioners,
v. AYALA LAND, INC., AVIDA LAND CORPORATION
AND LAGUNA TECHNOPARK, INC., Respondents.

G.R. No. 188027, August 09, 2017 - SWIRE REALTY

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, v.
SPECIALTY CONTRACTS GENERAL AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. AND JOSE
JAVELLANA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 195457, August 16, 2017 - READ-RITE

PHILIPPINES, INC., Petitioner, v. GINA G.
FRANCISCO, MAXIMINO H. REYES, LUCIA E.
MACHADO, IRENE G. ABANILLA, EDNA L. GUAVES,
ARLENE FRANCISCO, JOSEPHINE V. TRINIDAD,
MARILYN E. AMPARO, SOLITA F. SANTOS, ELLEN T.
CASTILLO, ROSALIE VALDEABELLA, MARITA E.
RIVERA, JULITA M. MAGNO, MARCIA P. DELA TORRE,
ELENA ANGCAHAN, ESTER H. REYES, CORAZON
ARMADILLA, IRMA A. PEREGRINO, DELFIN D. DUBAN,
AMANCIA PRADO, CECILIA D. NABUA, DANNY A.
CABUCOY, ELIZABETH R. REVELLAME, ELVIRA R.
MAGNO, GIERLYN R. MARASIGAN, JOHN JOSEPH R.
MAGNO, LODELYN P. CASTILLO, JUSTINA TORTOSA,
LENY M. ZARENO, LOIDA E. ESTOMATA, MA. BASILIA
DE LA ROSA, MA. GRACIA DE GUZMAN, MA. NENITA
G. CASTILLO, MERCEDARIO A. MARTINEZ, NORA M.
PAVELON, PRECILLA D. MAGBITANG, RAQUEL
CABUCOY, REGAL M. ALFARO, RIZA UMANDAP,
ROSALITA R. MANLUNAS, ROSEMARIE C. LEYVA,
ROSSANA M. YUMOL, SENETA SERENO, VILMA R.
MANALO, YOLANDA Y. MANGAOANG, GLORIA
BARSOLASCO AND NENA M. REYES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 211004, August 23, 2017 - QUEEN ERRIKA

L. SADDI, Petitioner, v. MARICRIS RENOMERON,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 223592, August 07, 2017 - EQUITABLE

INSURANCE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v.
TRANSMODAL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 221857, August 16, 2017 - JESUS O.

TYPOCO, JR., Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.; G.R. No. 222020 - NOEL
D. REYES, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 223731, August 30, 2017 - ROBELITO

MALINIS TALAROC, Petitioner, v. ARPAPHIL
SHIPPING CORPORATION, EPIDAURUS S.A., AND/OR
NATIVIDAD PAPPAS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 224204, August 30, 2017 - PHILIPPINE

VETERANS BANK, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES RAMON AND
ANNABELLE SABADO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 224225, August 14, 2017 - NORMA I.

BARING, Petitioner, v. ELENA LOAN AND CREDIT
COMPANY, INC., Respondent.
 G.R. No. 211845, August 09, 2017 - PEN
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND LAS BRISAS
RESORT CORPORATION, Petitioners, v. MARTINEZ
LEYBA, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 215454, August 09, 2017 - HEIRS OF

SPOUSES CORAZON P. DE GUZMAN AND FORTUNATO
DE GUZMAN, REPRESENTED BY JENIE JANE DE
GUZMAN-CARPIO, Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF
MARCELIANO BANDONG, REPRESENTED BY REGINA
Z. BANDONG, Respondents.

G.R. No. 201478, August 23, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PAROK LUMUDAG
Y RACMAN @ AKMAD, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 210669, August 01, 2017 - HI-LON

MANUFACTURING, INC., Petitioner, v. COMMISSION
ON AUDIT, Respondent.

A.C. No. 8574, August 16, 2017 - CARMELO

IRINGAN, Complainant, v. ATTY. CLAYTON B.
GUMANGAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 196342, August 08, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. NOEL GO CAOILI ALIAS
"BOY TAGALOG", Respondent.; G.R. No. 196848,
August 8, 2017 - NOEL GO CAOILI, Petitioner, v.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 230696, August 30, 2017 - WILLIAM R.

WENCESLAO, VIVENCIO B. RODRIGO, JR., NOEL N.
DAMIASAN, VIRGILIO B. CRISTOBAL, JEMYLITO M.
APIAG, JOVENAL P. ATAG, ARNULFO S. DASCO,
CARLITO E. INFANTE, ALFREDO T. VISAYA, JAMES M.
REAL, RENATO A. GUINGUE, ZACARIAS G. TALABOC,
JR., GEORGE N. TAGUIAM, RANDY D. ABRENCILLO,
MELECIO B. QUINIMON, CESAR B. JARANILLA,
RIZALDE R. BARILE, HERICO A. BUENAVENTE,
JERSON A. TATOY, MICHAEL L. CASIANO, FELIX M.
DINIAY, PEDRO DELA CRUZ, JR., JHOSEL BOY G.
ABAYON, AUGUSTO L. OCENAR, MARIO M. FUNELAS,
AND AVELINO T. QUIÑONES, Petitioners, v. MAKATI
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DANTE ABANDO AND
COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 227734, August 09, 2017 - ROMEO ALBA,

Petitioner, v. CONRADO G. ESPINOSA, ET AL.,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 208471, August 02, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERNESTO
SAGANA Y DE GUZMAN, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 207396, August 09, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DELIA SAUNAR,
Accused-Appellant.

OCA IPI No. 10-3423-P, August 22, 2017 - JUDGE

RAMON V. EFONDO, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF
GOA, CAMARINES SUR, Complainant, v. EDEN D.
FAVORITO, CLERK OF COURT II, MUNICIPAL TRIAL
COURT, GOA, CAMARINES SUR, Respondent.; A.M. No.
P-11-2889 [FORMERLY OCA IPI No. 10-10-117-MTC
FINANCIAL AUDIT CONDUCTED IN THE MTC OF GOA,
CAMARINES SUR] - OFFICE OF THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v. EDEN D.
FAVORITO, CLERK OF COURT II, MUNICIPAL TRIAL
COURT, GOA, CAMARINES SUR, Respondent.

G.R. No. 197297, August 02, 2017 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES DANILO
GO AND AMORLINA GO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 185420, August 29, 2017 - LANAO DEL

NORTE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., AS
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER ENGR.
RESNOL C. TORRES, Petitioner, v. PROVINCIAL
GOVERNMENT OF LANAO DEL NORTE, AS
REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR HON. MOHAMAD
KHALID Q. DIMAPORO AND ITS PROVINCIAL
TREASURER, MILDRED J. HINGCO, PROVINCIAL
ASSESSOR, NATIONAL ELECTRIFICATION
ADMINISTRATION (NEA), AS REPRESENTED BY ITS
ADMINISTRATOR HON. EDITA S. BUENO, POWER
SECTOR ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT
(PSALM), AS REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND
CEO HON. JOSE C. IBAZETA, DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY (DOE), AS REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
HON. ANGELO T. REYES, THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT
(COA), AS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN HON.
REYNALDO A. VILLAR, Respondents.

G.R. No. 224631, August 23, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUPERTO
RUBILLAR, JR. Y GABERON, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 221991, August 30, 2017 - JOSELITO

PERALTA Y ZARENO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 222430, August 30, 2017 - TRANSGLOBAL

MARITIME AGENCY, INC., GOODWOOD
SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE., LTD. AND/OR MICHAEL
ESTANIEL, Petitioners, v. VICENTE D. CHUA, JR.,
Respondent.
 G.R. No. 180447, August 23, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERNANDO
GERONIMO Y AGUSTINE, ALIAS "NANDING
BAKULAW", Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 193625, August 30, 2017 - AICHI

FORGING COMPANY OF ASIA, INC., Petitioner, v.
COURT OF TAX APPEALS - EN BANC AND
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 191615, August 02, 2017 - VICTORIA P.

CABRAL, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF FLORENCIO ADOLFO
AND HEIRS OF ELIAS POLICARPIO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 218592, August 02, 2017 - CHRISTOPHER

FIANZA A.K.A. "TOPEL," Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 185894, August 30, 2017 - BELO MEDICAL

GROUP, INC., Petitioner, v. JOSE L. SANTOS AND
VICTORIA G. BELO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 197654, August 30, 2017 - MERCURY DRUG

CORPORATION AND ROLANDO J. DEL ROSARIO,
Petitioners, v. SPOUSES RICHARD Y. HUANG &
CARMEN G. HUANG, AND STEPHEN G. HUANG,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 205483, August 23, 2017 - MARIO MAGAT,

SR., MARIO S. MAGAT, JR. MARIO S. MAGAT, III, MA.
MARGARITA M. ESTAVILLA, MA. MARJORIE S. MAGAT,
ALL SUBSTITUTE PARTIES AND HEIRS OF THE
DECEASED PARTY, JULIANA S. MAGAT, Petitioners, v.
TANTRADE CORPORATION AND PABLO S. BORJA, JR.,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 180745, August 30, 2017 - ALBERTA DE

JOYA IGLESIAS, Petitioner, v. THE OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN, GEORGE M. JEREOS, ROBERTO G.
GEOTINA, JUAN T. TAN, KRISTINE MORALES, AND
ALBERTO LINA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 205638, August 23, 2017 - DEE HWA

LIONG FOUNDATION MEDICAL CENTER AND
ANTHONY DEE, Petitioners, v. ASIAMED SUPPLIES
AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 203943, August 30, 2017 - MAGSAYSAY

MARITIME CORPORATION/EDUARDO MANESE AND
PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD., Petitioners, v.
CYNTHIA DE JESUS, Respondent.

G.R. No. 202364, August 30, 2017 - ARTURO C.

CALUBAD, Petitioner, v. RICARCEN DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 199107, August 30, 2017 - ALFONSO

SINGSON CORTAL, JUANITO SINGSON CORTAL,
NENITA CODILLA, GENEROSO PEPITO LONGAKIT,
PONCIANA BATOON, AND GREGORIA SABROSO,
Petitioners, v. INAKI A. LARRAZABAL ENTERPRISES,
REPRESENTED BY INAKI P. LARRAZABAL, JR., THE
HONORABLE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGIONAL
OFFICE NO. VIII, TACLOBAN CITY AND THE
HONORABLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRARIAN REFORM, QUEZON CITY IN HIS CAPACITY
AS CHAIRMAN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM ADJUDICATION BOARD (DARAB),
Respondents.

G.R. No. 208314, August 23, 2017 - ANTONIO B.

MANANSALA, Petitioner, v. MARLOW NAVIGATION
PHILS., INC./MARLOW NAVIGATION CO.
LTD./CYPRUS, AND/OR EILEEN MORALES,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 214771, August 09, 2017 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUBEN "ROBIN"
BONGBONGA Y NALOS, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 196564, August 07, 2017 - GOVERNMENT

SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM (GSIS), Petitioner, v.
ALBERT M. VELASCO, Respondent.

Copyright © 1998 - 20191998 - 2019 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED