Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Financial Services
Disinvestment
1. Economic Affairs
The Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, is responsible
for advice on economic issues having a bearing on internal and external
aspects of the Indian economy including inflation, price control, foreign
exchange management, Official Development Assistance domestic finance
and preparation of the Union Budget, bilateral and multilateral engagement
with international financial institutions and other countries.
2. Expenditure
Expenditure is the spending of money on something, or the money that is
spent on something.
This ministry eclipses whole economic and financial system. All regulatory bodies and attached
SEBI=The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is the regulator for
the securities market in India. It was established in 1988 and given statutory
powers on 30 January 1992 through the SEBI Act, 1992.
IRDAI = The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of
India (IRDAI) is an autonomous, statutory body tasked with regulating and
promoting the insurance and re-insurance industries in India. It was constituted by
the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999, an Act of
Parliament passed by the Government of India. The agency's headquarters are
in Hyderabad, Telangana, where it moved from Delhi in 2001.
IRDAI is a 10-member body including the chairman, five full-time and four part-
time members appointed by the government of India.
Rangarajan Committee in 2010 recommended that this distinction should be done away with.
Reason was that this distinction resulted in over focus on Plan expenditure and neglect of Non
plan expenditure. It projected Non Plan expenditure as a waste expenditure, and various welfare
lobbies kept pressurizing government to increase proportion of plan expenditure at cost of non-
plan. This resulted in substandard quality and under financing of basic responsibilities of
Apart from this expenditure is also classified into, Capital and Revenue Expenditure. Former
involves creation of durable capital assets and latter is consumption expenditure with no durable
assets created.
1. Tax revenue
Direct Taxes
No DT IDT
1 Income tax, corporate tax, Excise duty, custom duty, service tax,
wealth tax etc. are examples value added tax etc.
3 Tax payers has to register Dealer has to register with tax authorities
with tax authorities. not the tax payer
4 Do not have any impact on Any increase in IDT increase cost and
cost, price and demand of price but reduces demand of goods.
goods.
If Indirect tax (say Sales tax) is 10%, it will be collected at three stages on same
product. So new prices will be Manuf. = 100+10% = 110; Wholesaler = 110 + 10%
(tax) = 121 + Rs 20 (profit) = 141; Retailer= 141+ 10% (tax) = 155 + 30 (profit) =
Rs 185. This way, with simple flat sales tax rate, consumer end up paying
substantially higher prices. He also paid tax on tax, which is called cascading effect
(note that Rs 141 at which 10% tax was claimed by retailer already includes Rs 21
of tax). Government got tax of 10+11+14.1 = Rs 35.1, for sale of Rs 185 which is
significantly higher that 10%.
To remove this distortion and cascading effect, Value added tax was introduced. In this case tax
was charged only on ‘value addition’ at every stage. At first stage 10% tax will be paid by
manufacturer and goods will be invoiced at 110, now wholesaler will sell at Rs 100 (actual cost)
He will collect Rs 12 from retailer and while paying this 12 to government he’ll deduct Rs 10 he
This was that product will reach customer as 100+20+30=150 + 10% = Rs 165 and customers
pays Rs. 150 to retailer and Rs 15 (10%) to government, through retailer. VAT though removed
cascading effects of sales tax, yet there is plethora of other indirect taxes (such as Service tax,
excise duty, custom duty, luxury tax etc.) which add up to the costs because of their cascading
effect.
Further, VAT is chargeable in different states at different rates. In case of goods sold from one
state to another CST is charged for which input credit is not allowed. All this create impediments
in intercourse of national markets and trades, which is much desirable for competitive markets,
Taxation subjects are divided between center and states as per lists in schedule seven under
article 246. For e.g. its gives Excise, customs, service tax to center and sales tax/vat to state.
This multiplicity of taxes has unfavorable impact on GDP as to avoid complexities; people
prefer to conceal their transactions. It is estimated that GST will push growth rate up by 1-1.5%.
Further, it obviously makes India performing poorly at indexes like ’ease of doing business’.
This is because all these taxes have separate compliance provisions and reporting mechanisms.
More requirements for compliance naturally create more avenues for corruption and rent
seeking.
One of the biggest taxation reforms in India — the Goods and Service Tax (GST) — is all set to
integrate State economies and boost overall growth. GST will create a single, unified Indian
market to make the economy stronger. Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee while presenting the
Budget on July 6, 2009, said that GST would come into effect from April 2010.
The basic principle governing behind GST is to have single Taxation System for Goods and
Services across the country. As already said, currently Indian economy has various taxes
on Goods and services such as VAT, Service Tax, Excise, Entertainment Tax, Luxury Tax Etc.
now in the new Proposal of GST; we will be having only two taxes on all goods and Services as
follows:
A unified rate will be arrived at for e.g. (10+6), which will comprise of both Central and state
proposed amendments in the Constitution will confer powers both to the Parliament and State
legislatures to make laws for levying GST on the supply of goods and services in the same
transaction.
GST will –
It is feature of a good taxation regime that while keeping tax rates low they should attempt to
Due to the seamless transfer of input tax credit from one state to another in the chain of value
addition, there is an in-built mechanism in the design of GST that would incentivize tax
compliance by traders. It is thus, expected that introduction of GST will foster a common and
seamless Indian market and contribute significantly to the growth of the economy.
4. Reduce cost of collection for government: Currently government has huge bureaucracy
collecting different taxes. Integration will naturally result into downsizing of bureaucracy and
hence reduction of collection costs. Amusingly, in case of wealth tax (direct tax – charged over
wealth over Rs. 30 lakhs) collection is so low that, cost of collection is more than tax collected.
5. Impact on Inflation: In long term, GST will undoubtedly result in easing of inflation.
However as initially rates of integrated GST are expected to be kept as high as 16% or
more, it is well above current service tax, excise or VAT rates. In case of services, it will
increase prices directly. In case of other goods inflation depends upon their present
component of taxation viz. excise, VAT, Custom etc. For e.g. some goods which are
currently exempted from excise (but are chargeable to VAT) will bear new burden of
A new Article 246A is proposed which will confer simultaneous power to Union and State
A new Article 279A is proposed for the creation of a Goods & Services Tax
Council which will be a joint forum of the Centre and the States. This Council would
function under theChairmanship of the Union Finance Minister and will have Ministers
with Legislatures, as members. The Council will make recommendations to the Union
and the States on important issues like tax rates, exemptions, threshold limits, dispute
The proposed GST has been designed keeping in mind the federal structure enshrined in the
1. Central taxes like Central Excise Duty, Additional Excise Duties, Service Tax, Additional
Customs Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD), etc. will be
2. At the State level, taxes like VAT/Sales Tax, Central Sales Tax, Entertainment Tax, Octroi
and Entry Tax, Purchase Tax and Luxury Tax, etc. would be subsumed in GST.
3. All goods and services, except alcoholic liquor for human consumption and Petroleum
would levy and collect Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), and States would levy
and collect the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) on all transactions within a State.
5. In case of interstate trade – The Centre would levy and collect the Integrated Goods
and Services Tax (IGST) on all inter-State supply of goods and services. There will be
seamless flow of input tax credit from one State to another. Proceeds of IGST will be
6. GST is a destination-based tax. All SGST on the final product will ordinarily accrue to
the consuming State. It means that as goods will move in value chain from producer to
consumer, whole GST burden/price will be recovered from consumer. (As explained in
7. GST rates will be uniform across the country. However, to give some fiscal autonomy to
the States and Centre, there will a provision of a narrow tax band over and above the
goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. This tax will be for a period not
exceeding 2 years, or further such period as recommended by the GST Council. This
additional tax on supply of goods shall be assigned to the States from where such
supplies originate. Because GST is a destination based tax, tax will accrue to states in
which goods are ultimately sold. So, to compensate states from which goods originated this
Finance Minister expects that if they are able to push GST through state legislature smoothly,
then they can roll out GST in 2016. As this tinkers with federal fiscalism of the nation and
require amendment in Schedule 7 and so many other federal articles (246A-279A), it is supposed
to be passed by atleast half of state legislatures along with in both houses of parliament by
special majority. So, it is to be seen that, whether current government able to do so.
Tax reforms have been in news for some time. GST is one of the major reform for which
processing or in SEZ/EOU, keep rolling out tax holiday schemes. Under these schemes
investment as per some conditions, attracts a certain tax exemption for a certain period.
Overtime, businesses started exploiting these schemes to fullest by ‘aggressive tax planning’.
Under these planning companies often used some or other loophole to secure more tax
exemption than was reasonably due under spirit of the scheme. Reliance Industries was
particularly notorious for this about a decade back. Eventually, these companies declared
significant profits and dividends year after year, but ‘taxable profit’ as per income tax rule
remained nil. Note that ‘book profits’ and ‘Taxable Profits’ are different. Adjustments are made
into former to arrive at latter. So say with aggressive tax panning ‘book profits’ are Rs 100
To remedy this Minimum alternate Tax was introduced under which Minimum Floor rates were
introduced on which companies will, notwithstanding any exemptions it enjoy, was liable to
because of concessions were forced to pay taxes. This kept investment away from Indian Special
2. Retrospective Taxation – few years back Hutchison (Telecom Company based in Hong
Kong) sold its stake in Hutch Essar to Vodafone PLC, and reaped huge profits. But all this profit
which accrued in India, escaped from income tax by exploiting loopholes in the law. This was
enormous loss to exchequer. Since this event, income Tax department had been desperately
trying to recover tax from Vodafone. For this government in 2012 budget gave itself power for
retrospective amendment in Income Tax and finance acts. Through this government can make
new laws or change current laws or cancel amendment, all with force from backdate. Note that
Article 20 prohibits retrospective legislation in case of criminal law only and it allows same for
civil laws.
3. General Anti Avoidance Rules – It was to be introduced wef. 1stApril, 2014 to check
aggressive tax planning and flouting of income tax laws. It gives more power to Income
Tax officials on how treat a suspicious entry in books of accounts. Onus to prove that entry
is bonafied is on assesse. But, budget 2014 didn’t mention anything about GAAR, after
budget, MoS for finance replied in parliament, “GAAR will be applicable from 1st April
2015.”
All this (MAT, retrospective taxation and GAAR) gave Indian Government and Income Tax
department much bad name in eyes of all types of investors and business community. State was
accused of unleashing ‘tax terrorism’ on businesses to make good its own weaknesses and
Shome (This is different from above mentioned expert panel). Its terms of reference, as name
reduce cost of tax collection and increase tax base. This involved capacity building of Tax
Merge Central Board of Direct Taxes and Central Board of Excise and Customs (these are
currently under department of revenue and oversees direct and indirect taxes, respectively)
Abolish post of revenue secretary and instead “council of chairmen of boards” should be
Work of Dept. Of Revenue be allocated to above two boards, it will result in better
efficiency in collection.
Income Tax return – should include wealth tax return, Pre filled returns could be
considered.
other government departments also such as customs, central excise, service tax, DGFT and
EPFO
develop a common tax policy, analysis and legislation for both direct and indirect taxes
Efficient and speedy payments of tax refunds and Passbook scheme for TDS
Tax being main source of government finance is central for resource mobilization in economy.
But in India Tax to GDP ratio is quite low. Combined (state center) tax to GDP ratio is only
15%. In other developing countries it is as high as 35%. For center alone in India it is (11-12%).
Main reason is narrow taxation base and huge Tax Expenditure (or Tax foregone) by government
of India.
The statutory rates of taxes as notified by respective laws are divergent from the actual or
These provisions allow people to pay lower taxes by claiming deductions under various rules.
Consequently, significant amount of tax is legally not received by government. This point
remains most potent weapon in hands of left leaning parties to attack government.
A tax expenditure statement was laid before the Parliament for the first time in 2006-07 and it
seeks to list the revenue impact of tax incentives or tax subsidies that are a part of the tax system
upward trend for both direct and indirect taxes, it is imperative to introduce sunset clause with
Non-tax revenues of the centre mainly consist of interest and dividend receipts of the
government, receipts from the services provided by central government like supply of central
police force, issue of passport and visa, registration of companies, patents and licence fees,
royalty from offshore oil fields, Coal mines and various receipts from the telecom and other
sectors.
Further, there are sometimes handsome proceeds in from of non-debt capital receipts, which
arise from disinvestments. Disinvestments targets last year were failed at miserably and this year
government is quite optimistic about reaping benefits from good stock valuations at stock
Budgetary Deficits
higher non-plan commitments, low tax to GDP ratio and high tax foregone, all this boil downs to
Deficits i.e. spending more than earning. There are different forms of budget deficit viz. primary
Whenever we are told that government expenditure has exceeded itsreceipts, in short that we
have incurred budget deficit, before arriving at any conclusion we need to ask some further
expenditure? If so this is undesirable and correction in this should be prime focus of government.
If revenue expenditure is less than Revenue income than Revenue deficit takes place. (RE-
RI = RD) In this situation deficit will be financed by capital receipts. Capital receipts come from
productive investments. Under resource mobilization we are attempting to tilt national income,
away from consumption, towards savings and then eventually towards productive investment.
But, note here what’s happening? Here Investment resources are sold off to fund consumption.
Our 2nd question will be – was capital (or even revenue) expenditure financed through
There may be situation where Revenue deficit was nil, but Fiscal Deficit was positive, this
indicates that borrowing, were used to finance capital asset creation. Now policymakers and
observers are keen to see that assets which are created on back of borrowings are productive
Hypothetically, say when under MSP regime, wheat is procured from farmer by FCI at Rs 15/ kg
and then through state PDS, this is sold at discounted prices of Rs. 1. Deficit of Rs. 14 has been
incurred. Now at the yearend government has to pay farmer its due. It got just 1 rupee from
consumer, it will give balance money from tax it collected. Now again tax it collected comes out
to Rs. 10.
Now we can say revenue deficit of Rs 3 has been Incurred (Rs. 14-11)
Now government sold some PSU and is able arrange Rs 2 from that, now fiscal deficit will be
Rs. 1, which will be borrowed by the government. (So Fiscal Deficit = Borrowing)
Case 2
Note that if earning from PSU was Rs 3 than there was no Fiscal Deficit.
Case 3
Wheat procured is for Rs. 15 and some Dam is created by Govt. for Rs 5. Wheat sold for PDS @
1, tax collected is Rs 14. Now revenue deficit is Nil. And government sold some PSU for 2.
This is much tenable situation. In fact Fiscal Deficit is used to create demand in economy and it
is method of Redistribution of resources. Note in this example that Tax collected of Rs. 14 has
moved from taxpayers to farmers and Targeted beneficiaries of PDS. Also note that, Spending of
Rs. 15 + 5 is more than income of government i.e. Rs. 17. Now there is Rs 3 more in circulation
and this on one hand will revive demand and on other, it will create inflationary conditions.
It was John Keynes which in aftermath of Great Depression propagated that governments should
Third question that can be asked is – How much flexibility do we have to curtail our
expenditure?
fiscal deficit to arrive at Primary deficit. So primary deficit = Fiscal Deficit – interest on
borrowings
survive and grow themselves in market. But at same time government has to set minimum
standards and provide safety nets to disadvantaged and vulnerable people of the society.
For this to happen successfully in long term, require governments to observe strict fiscal
discipline. There is always immense pressure on government for spend its resources for
competing interests. In turn government is always vulnerable for giving in blindly to such
demands, due to political compulsions. Going too much beyond its resources may be beneficial
in short term but for long term it results in to piling up of debt and ever increasing interest
living beyond its means, and to finance its expenditure it borrows money, which is to be paid
backing future. This borrowing will accumulate interest overtime and after some time Principle
along with interest will be paid by government by charging future tax payers, who are forced to
Deficit ruins monetary policy of RBI – RBI makes monetary policy by monitoring supply of
money in the economy. Main target behind this is inflation. As we have seen in foregoing
discussion, that fiscal (and other) deficits increases money supply in the market, an inflationary
trend is created.
The main purpose was to eliminate revenue deficit of the country (building revenue surplus
thereafter) and bring down the fiscal deficit to a manageable 3% of the GDP by March 2008.
However, due to the 2007 international financial crisis, the deadlines for the implementation of
the targets in the act was initially postponed and subsequently suspended in 2009. In 2011, given
the process of ongoing recovery, Economic Advisory Council publicly advised the Government
Further, the Act prohibits borrowing by the government from the Reserve Bank of India, thereby,
making monetary policy independent of fiscal policy. The Act bans the purchase of primary
issues of the Central Government securities by the RBI after 2006, preventing monetization of
government deficit.
After reinstatement of FRBM act new targets were agreed at. Accordingly current year target is
It should be noted that, government used undesirable means to contain deficit last year.
Government PSUs were forced to shell out huge dividends, some expenses were differed on next
years and worst was that there was huge cut on plan expenditure. This crumbled centrally
Government Borrowings
Fiscal deficit is nothing but borrowings of the government. Government has three sources viz.
Borrow from RBI, Borrow from Open Market or Borrow from abroad.
In case it borrows from abroad it has to see that long term borrowings don’t are not financing
revenue consumption and productive assets are created against them. This is also true for
domestic borrowings.
Government keeps issuing bonds and Banks subscribes to these as they are required to invest in
these bonds to comply with Statutory Lending Ratio (22% of net time and demand deposits).
There is well built primary and secondary debt market in which bond securities are subscribed to.
If fiscal deficit is high, it will result in increased inflation and money demanded by government
from any of the source will be high. Here as demand for money becomes high, bond yields will
shoot up and bond prices will fall. Say 6% Bond already trading at 98 will fall to 96, this will
increase yield which is now Rs. 6 @ Rs 96 bond. This increased yield will become new rate at
deficit’ which is most undesirable. It means government will sell new bonds to RBI, which will
pay Government newly printed currency. This will increase money supply in economy without
This ratio measures government debt to percentage of GDP. Factors influencing it are
Last two factors are most interesting, if GDP growth rate is above interest rate on debt, then ratio
tends to decline overtime, this happened in India upto few years back, when growth rate was
high. But with slowing down of economy, and growth rate falling below rate of return has
This is serious concern, because GDP is directly proportional to tax collection. If ratio rises,
more tax will go to serving interests and fiscal deficit will be higher.
India’s debt to GDP ratio is much comfortable and is hovering around 50%. Further, India’s debt
majorly consists of ‘long term’ and domestic debt. In contrast countries like China have majorly
external debt and their Debt is more than their GDP. This is case with most of the developed
countries. Japan’s ratio is whopping 250% of its GDP, because of very low tax collections there.