Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

AZCOR Manufacturing Inc., Filipinas Paso and/or Arturo advantage should the case be filed.

Zuluaga/Owner v NLRC and Candido Capulso | GR No. However, Candido continued working
117963, February 11, 1999| BELLOSILLO, J. | | by Jasper after the lapse of the contract and until
alleged termination
FACTS: ○ 2 resignation letters allegedly executed by
● Candido worked as ceramics worker for 2+ years Candido are exactly worded, which only
from 3 April 1989 to 1 June 1991. From April to shows that they were prepared by
September 1989 the amount of P50.00 was petitioners plus after the fact that
deducted from his salary without informing him of Candido denied having executed and
the reason. signed the same.
● In the 2nd week of February 1991, upon doctor's ○ No interruption of service of Candido with
recommendation, Candido verbally requested to AZCOR from April 13 1989 up to June 1,
go on sick leave due to bronchial asthma, directly 1991 when Candido was unceremoniously
caused by his job where, for lack of the prescribed dismissed. Considering that AZCOR and
occupational safety gadgets, he inhaled and Filipinas Paso orchestrated the events that
absorbed harmful ceramic dusts. His supervisor, appeared to be in order with the alleged
Ms. Apolinaria, approved his request. Later, on 1 execution of resignation letters likewise
June 1991, Candido went back to AZCOR to resume showed bad faith
his work after recuperating from his illness, but ISSUES/RATIO:
was not allowed to do so by his supervisors who 1. WoN Candido was illegally dismissed
informed him that only the owner, Zuluaga, could a. Yes, he did not voluntary resign. To
allow him to continue in his job. He returned5 constitute a resignation, it must be
times to AZCOR but when it became apparent that unconditional and with the intent to
he would not be reinstated, he filed with LA a operate as such. There must be an
complaint for illegal dismissal and illegal deduction intention to relinquish a portion of the
of P50.00 per day for the period April to term of office accompanied by an act of
September 1989. relinquishment.
○ Petitioners moved to dismiss complaint, b. The fact that Candido signified his desire
no ER-EE relationship between AZCOR and to resume his work when he went back to
Candido, he became an employee of petitioner AZCOR after recuperating from
Filipinas Paso effective 1 March 1990 but his illness, and actively pursued his case
voluntarily resigned a year after for illegal dismissal when he was refused
● LA: denied motion to dismiss, lack of ER-EE admission by his employer, negated any
relationship not clearly established. Hearing intention on his part to relinquish his job
conducted. at AZCOR.
○ Petitioners: Candido was former c. Moreover, a closer look at the subject
employee of AZCOR who resigned on 28 resignation letters readily reveals the
February 1990 as evidenced by a letter of following:
resignation and joined Filipinas Paso on 1 i. (a) the resignation letter
March 1990 as shown by a contract of allegedly tendered by Capulso to
employment; in February 1991 Candido Filipinas Paso was identically
allegedly informed his supervisor, Ms. worded with that supposedly
Apolinaria, that he intended to go on addressed by him to AZCOR;
terminal leave because he was not feeling ii. (b) both were pre-drafted with
well; on 1 March 1991 submitted a letter blank spaces filled up with the
of resignation addressed to the President purported dates of effectivity of
of Filipinas Paso, Manuel Montilla; and, in his resignation; and,
June 1991 Candido tried to apply for work iii. (c) it was written in English, a
again with Filipinas Paso but no vacancy language which Capulso was not
● LA: dismissed complaint for illegal dismissal for lack conversant with considering his
of merit. low level of education. No other
● NLRC: modified the LA: (a) declaring the dismissal plausible explanation can be
of Candido as illegal for lack of just and valid cause; drawn from these circumstances
(b) ordering petitioners to reinstate Candido to his than that the subject letters of
former or equivalent xxx resignation were prepared by a
○ Contract of employment: period is for 6 person or persons other than
months, which establishes a presumption Capulso. And the fact that he
that the said contract could pass either as categorically disowned the
to cover the probationary period, or job signatures therein and denied
contracting, the completion of which having executed them clearly
automatically terminates employment, indicates that the resignation
whichever will work to respondent's letters were drafted without his
consent and participation.
d. Even assuming for the sake of argument
that the signatures were genuine, we still
cannot give credence to those letters in
the absence of any showing that Capulso
was aware that what he was signing then
were in fact resignation letters or that he
fully understood the contents thereof.
e. Having introduced those resignation
letters in evidence, it was incumbent upon
petitioners to prove clearly and
convincingly their genuineness and due
execution, especially considering the
serious doubts on their authenticity.
Petitioners miserably failed in this respect.
RULING: WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED. The
NLRC Decision of 12 September 1994 is MODIFIED.
Petitioners AZCOR MANUFACTURING, INC., FILIPINAS
PASO and ARTURO ZULUAGA are ORDERED to pay, jointly
and solidarily, the heirs of private respondent Candido
Capulso the amounts representing his back wages,
inclusive of allowances and other benefits, and separation
pay to be computed in accordance with law.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen