Republic of the Philippines

MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES

First Judicial Region

BRANCH 5

CITY OF BAGUIO

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Plaintiff,

-versus- Criminal Case No. 65432

For: Violation of BP 22

PETER A. SANTIAGO,

Accused.

x--------------------------------x

FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE

COMES NOW, Peter A. Santiago, respondent respectfully offers in
evidence the following documentary exhibits for the stated purposes:

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION/ PURPOSE

DOCUMENT
1 Counter-Affidavit of Peter To prove that respondent,
A. Santiago, executed on Peter A. Santiago files a,
26th day of August 2019. affidavit responding to and
contradicting the affidavit
produced by an adversary
within the prescribed time.

2 Judicial Affidavit of Peter A. To prove the following:

Santaigo, executed on 1. The material
September 6, 2019. allegations in the
Complaint for
Violation of B.P. 22
or the “Bouncing
Check Law” and in
relation thereto
 2. Compliance with the
requirement of the
A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC.

3 Judicial Affidavit of Andrew That his testimony will

E. Pascual, executed on prove that there is no
September 6, 2019. violation of BP 22 or the
Bouncing Check Law as
issued by Peter A.
Santiago; and that there is
a new agreement of the
terms and conditions
between Peter A. Santiago
and April B. Mantalaba.

In Compliance with the

requirement of the A.M. No.
12-8-8-SC.

4 Acknowledgement Receipt To prove that respondent,

executed and signed by Peter A. Santiago pay in
April B. Mantalaba on May cash FIFTY THOUSAND
2, 2019. (P50,000.00) PESOS,
Philippine Currency as first
payment, which is to be
deducted for his rent for
the month of May 2019.

5 Affidavit executed by Peter To prove that respondent,

A. Santiago on the 26th day Peter A. Santiago never
of August 2019. received any notice or
documents from Security
Bank – Abanao Branch,
either in his place of
residence at No. 7 Richgate
Subdivision, Camp 7,
Baguio City or at the
address of his business at
No. 10 Marcos Highway,
Baguio City.

That compliance under

Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 or
the Bouncing Check Law
(BP 22) for the notice of
Dishonor from the bank
never made.

6 Affidavit executed by To prove that being the

Andrew E. Pascual on the secretary of Peter A.
26th day of August 2019. Santiago never received
any notice and such other
documents from the
Security Bank – Abanao
 Branch.

That compliance under

Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 or
the Bouncing Check Law
(BP 22) for the notice of
Dishonor from the bank
never made.

The originally marked copies of Exhibits “1” to “6”, including the sub-markings,
have been previously marked and attached to the original of this Formal Offer of
Evidence.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, respondent respectfully prays that this Honorable Court

admit in evidence all the foregoing documentary exhibits for the purposes for
which they are offered.

Respondent further prays for such other relief as may be deemed just
and equitable.

PETER A. SANTIAGO
Affiant
UMID 0111-3612340-1