Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Concentration A510
4.0 0.160
10.0 0.390
16.0 0.630
24.0 0.950
32.0 1.260
40.0 1.580
SLOPE 0.0394924
INT -0.0010079
Calculations
Absorbance 1
Concentration, ppm 25.346823
ERROR ANALYSIS
Sr(stand.error in y) 0.003346
N 6
Sxx 926
Summation Xi 126.0
Summation Xi^2 3572.0
Sm 0.00011
Sb 0.002683
406x - 0.0010079194
47
volume aliquot 25
volume total diluted 500
dilution factor 20
volume aliquot 0
volume total diluted 0
0.5
0.4
0.1
Slope 0.025028571
Intercept 0.206142857 0
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Conc of Pd 8.24E-06
orbance vs. Volume Standard
x + 0.2061428571
Solution Iteration
Conc Co 6.745112730993E-05
Conc Ni 5.901608417216E-05 5.901608417216E-05
Predicted A (365)
Predicted A (700)
E(700) Ni
10.2
MOLE RATIO
0
0 0
Absorbance vs. M
START HERE
Absorbance
0.6
Conc. Ligand Absorbance
1.00E-05 0.131 0.5
2.00E-05 0.265 f(x) = 50x + 0.495
R² = 1
3.00E-05 0.396 0.4
4.00E-05 0.468 f(x) = 13250x - 0.001
R² = 0.999957282
5.00E-05 0.487 0.3
6.00E-05 0.498
8.00E-05 0.499 0.2
1.00E-04 0.5
0.1
0
0.00E+00 2.00E-05 4.00E-05 6.00E-0
Concentratio
Slope 1 13250
Intercept 1 -0.001
Slope 2 50
Intercept 2 0.495
In mole ratio
conc one reactant constant
conc other reactant varied
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0.6
0.5
f(x) = 50x + 0.495 f(x) = 50x + 0.495
R² = 1 R² = 1
0.4
(x) = 13250x - 0.001 f(x) = 13250x - 0.001
² = 0.999957282 R² = 0.999957282
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2.00E-05 4.00E-05 6.00E-05 8.00E-05 1.00E-04 1.20E-04 0.00E+00 2.00E-05 4.00E-05 6.00E-05 8.00E-05 1.00E-04
Concentration of L, M Concentration of L, M
vs. Mole Ratio
Absorbance
6.00E-05 0.616 0.4
7.00E-05 0.719 0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-0
SLOPE (Eb/x) 10277.11782 Concentratio of Nickel, M
LINEST VALUES
Input Data of Second (conc M, plot Ligand) Absorbance vs. Ligand Concentrati
Conc of Ni, M 1.00E-03 0.3
0.25
C CDA M Absorbance f(x) = 3426.5679781847x - 0.0002119205
9.00E-06 0.031 0.2 R² = 0.9999840915
Absorbance
in slope ratio
assumption
1. in excess ang isa ka reactant to complete rxn
2. Beer's Law followed
3. complex absorbs at wav chosen
steps
1. Plot Abs vs conc of the two line 1 Mx
2. get two eqns of line line 2 Ly
3. get that MxLy
slope of line 1 Eb/x
slope of line 2 Eb/y
4. get ratio
bs vs. Conc Metal
0.7
81889x - 0.000381889 f(x) = 10277.11781889x - 0.000381889
06 R² = 0.9999987806
0.6
0.5
Absorbance
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05 0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05
0.25
f(x) = 3426.5679781847x - 0.0002119205
6.5679781847x - 0.0002119205 0.2 R² = 0.9999840915
9840915
Absorbance
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.00E+00 1.00E-05 2.00E-05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-0
05 3.00E-05 4.00E-05 5.00E-05 6.00E-05 7.00E-05 8.00E-05
Concentration of Ligand, M Concentration of Ligand, M
Ratio= sl 1/sl2
ation
Concentration
0002119205
0.800
VL VM VM+VL VL/(VM+VL) Absorbance f(x) = 1.7x + 0.005
R² = 0.998339095
0 10 10 0 0.000 0.700
1 9 10 0.1 0.174
0.600
2 8 10 0.2 0.353
3 7 10 0.3 0.530 0.500
Absorbance
4 6 10 0.4 0.672
5 5 10 0.5 0.723 0.400
6 4 10 0.6 0.673
0.300
7 3 10 0.7 0.537
8 2 10 0.8 0.358 0.200
9 1 10 0.9 0.180
0.100
10 0 10 1 0.000
0.000
0 0.2
Slope 1 1.7
Intercept 1 0.0058
Slope 2 -1.8
Intercept 2 1.8
Volume Ratio 0.51262857 x
y
in continuous variation
steps
1. get corrected absorbance
2. plot Absorbance versus (VM/(VM+VL) Vm= volume metal Vl= volume ligand
Optional
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.500
Absorbance
Absorbance
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.100
0.100
0.000
0.000 0 0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
(VL/ (VM +VL), mL
0.800 Absorbance vs. VL/(VL+VM)
f(x) = 1.7x + 0.0058 f(x) = - 1.789x + 1.7894
R² = 0.9983390954 R² = 0.9999956257
0.700
0.600
0.500
Absorbance
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
(VL/ (VM +VL), mL
CONTINUOUS VARIATION
CM 1.25E-04
CL 1.25E-04
Absorbance
6 4 10 0.4 0.673
0.400
7 3 10 0.3 0.537
8 2 10 0.2 0.358 0.300
9 1 10 0.1 0.180
10 0 10 0 0.000 0.200
0.100
in continuous variation
steps
1. get corrected absorbance
2. plot Absorbance versus (VM/(VM+VL) Vm= volume metal Vl= volume ligand
Optional
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 VM/ (VM+VL)
0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0.600
0.500
Absorbance
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0 0.2 0.4 VM/ (VM+VL)
0.6 0.8 1 1.2
CM 1.00E-04 1.2
CL 1.00E-04 f(x) = 1.968x - 0.0034
R² = 0.9998079389
1
5 5 10 0.5 0.931
6 4 10 0.6 0.993 0.2
7 3 10 0.7 1.059
8 2 10 0.8 0.972 0
0 0.2 0.4
9 1 10 0.9 0.588
10 0 10 1 0.001
Slope 1 1.968
Intercept 1 -0.0034
Slope 2 -5.87
Intercept 2 5.871
Volume Ratio 0.74947691
1.2
f(x) = 1.968x - 0.0034 f(x) = - 5.87x + 5.871
R² = 0.9998079389 R² = 1
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
F Fo Conc Fo/F
180 180 0.000 1.0000 Chart Title
180 87.5 0.005 2.0571
14.0000
180 58 0.010 3.1034
180 43.2 0.015 4.1667 12.0000
180 35 0.020 5.1429 f(x) = 209.9461725408x + 1.0091546076
10.0000 R² = 0.9998800963
180 28.5 0.025 6.3158
180 24.5 0.030 7.3469 8.0000
180 19.1 0.040 9.4241
6.0000
180 15.7 0.050 11.4650
4.0000
2.0000
0.0000
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040
1+kqT=
1+Ksv[Q]= Fo/F
Chart Title
725408x + 1.0091546076
963
dynamic
static
Known parameters E(480) Pd E(635) Pd E(480) Au
3.55E+03 5.64E+02 2.96E+03
Solution Iteration
Conc Pd 3.601782612222E-05
Conc Au 0.0001201091 0.0001201091
Predicted A (365)
Predicted A (700)
E(635) Au
1.45E+04
Volume Standard A660
0.00 0.24 Absorbance vs. Volu
5.00 0.437 1.2
10.00 0.621
15.00 0.809 1
f(x) = 0.0382x + 0.2412
20.00 1.009 R² = 0.999805964
0.8
0.6
Cx= bCs/mVx
if naa kay aliquots with different volumes nga imong gibutang sa volume total
dayon gibutangan nimong lain2 nga volume sa standard with known concentration
Absorbance vs. Volume Standard
0382x + 0.2412
99805964
Cs 0.05
Vs 1
Vx 25
A1 0.428
A2 0.517
Vt 26
Cx 0.007805
dilution factor