Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Daniele Pandolfi
Global Product Line Manager
Particle Measuring Systems
dpandolfi@pmeasuring.com
Agenda
• What’s the ISO 14644
• ISO 14644-1:2015 Cleanroom certification revision summary
• Notable areas of changes
• ISO 21501-4 Instrument Implications
• ISO 14644-2:2015 Cleanroom Monitoring revision summary
• Monitoring Plan Alternatives
• Risk Assessment
• Alert and Action Limits
• How to chose the right strategy
• Learn from FDA 483 Warning Letters
Introduction
• The recent revision of ISO 14644-1 and-2 has
introduced several changes for cleanroom
classification and monitoring guidelines.
• The ISO community voted in favor of this revision
on October 29th, 2015.
• This presentation discusses those changes and
how they affect you.
• Questions will be addressed at the end, but feel
free to voice them as they come to mind.
What is ISO 14644?
ISO 14644 consists of the following parts, under the general title Cleanrooms and associated
controlled environments:
• Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration
• Part 2: Monitoring to provide evidence of cleanroom performance related to air cleanliness by particle
concentration
• Part 3: Test methods
• Part 4: Design, construction and start-up
• Part 5: Operations
• Part 7: Separative devices (clean air hoods, gloveboxes, isolators and mini-environments)
• Part 8: Classification of air cleanliness by chemical concentration (ACC)
• Part 9: Classification of surface cleanliness by particle concentration
• Part 10: Classification of surface cleanliness by chemical concentration
What Is ISO 14644-1?
ISO 14644 represents the most used standards in Pharma
and Electronics controlled environments.
• A new table has been developed for the determination of the number of
sample locations, replacing “𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = 𝑚2 𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎”
from the ISO 14644-1:1999 version of the standard.
• For all room sizes above 6 m2, the new table results in an increase of
required sample locations.
ISO Class 1 10
ISO Class 2 100 24 10
ISO Class 3 1 000 237 102 35
ISO Class 4 10 000 2 370 1 020 352 83
ISO Class 5 100 000 23 700 10 200 3 520 832 29
ISO Class 6 1 000 000 237 000 102 000 35 200 8 320 298
ISO Class 7 352 000 83 200 2 930
ISO Class 8 3 520 000 832 000 29 300
ISO Class 9 35 200 000 8 320 000 293 000
ISO 14644-1:2015 – New Maximum Concentration Limits
Table 1 Selected airborne particulate cleanliness classes
ISO Class 1 10
ISO Class 2 100 24 10
ISO Class 3 1 000 237 102 35
ISO Class 4 10 000 2 370 1 020 352 83
ISO Class 5 100 000 23 700 10 200 3 520 832
ISO Class 6 1 000 000 237 000 102 000 35 200 8 320 298
ISO Class 7 352 000 83 200 2 930
ISO Class 8 3 520 000 832 000 29 300
ISO Class 9 35 200 000 8 320 000 293 000
ISO 14644-1:2015 – New Maximum Concentration Limits
As shown on the previous slide, the foremost concern in the Life Science industry
is the removal of the ≥ 5 µm particle concentration in ISO Class 5 clean areas
(for classification purposes) when compared to the ISO 14644-1:1999 version
This change to the ISO 14644 standard is a major concern for a number of
reviewers.
ISO 14644-1:2015 – Dealing with ≥ 5.0 micron particles
Primary reasoning for the de-emphasis of the ≥ 5 µm ISO Class 5 limit include:
14644-1:1999
14644-1:2015
Last but not least, the goal dictated by the TC 209 is:
SEQUENTIAL Location
Location1
• Performed using sequential “n”…
multiplexing systems.
• Unaccepted methods for
Pharmaceutical Industry
• High risk of particle loss in Location5 Location2
long tubing while measuring
particles greater than 1µm
Location4 Location3
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Monitoring Plan
CONTINUOUS
• Uses multiple particle counters,
one per individual location
• Continuous flow of data over Location A
time
• Immediate evaluation of
unexpected contamination
events
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Monitoring Plan
PERIODIC Week 1
• Scheduled particle monitoring
frequency (i.e. once per week)
Week 2
• ISO 14644-2:2015 requires the
test frequency to be defined
and clearly specified Week 3
Week «n»
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Sample Point
SAMPLE POINT LOCATION
• Understand the contamination
sources and their impact on the
activity in the cleanroom
– Locate particle counter probes as
close as possible to critical zones
Critical Point
• Maximum allowed distance
– 1 foot = 33cm
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Instrument Selection
INSTRUMENT SELECTION
• Airborne particle collection efficiency,
suitability to monitor the selected
particle size(s), and accessibility for
maintenance, calibration, and repair
• Potential adverse impact of the
sampling system on the process
• Air sample flow rate and volume
– 1 cfm / 28.3 lpm commonly used
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Instrument Selection – cont.
ISO REQUIREMENT
• ISO 14644-2:2015 requires that all instruments
employed in the cleanroom classification or
monitoring activities fully comply with ISO
21501-4.
• ISO 21501-4 states the calibration and
performance requirement for LSAPC (Light
Scattering Airborne Particle Counters)
ISO 14644-2:2015 – Remote Sampling
User set level at which, when User set level, defined to provide
exceeded, will require immediate early warning of a drift from normal
intervention, root cause conditions. This level should be used
investigation and corrective actions to prevent action level conditions.
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Alert and Action Limits
How to choose the right strategy
• The right determination of action and alert limits is extremely important and must be supported by
the risk assessment and a consistent quantity of historical data.
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Alert and Action Limits
How to choose the right strategy
• B.3.1.3 When setting alert and action levels, it is important to be sensitive to the high variability of airborne particle concentrations with time and at
different locations. In particular, special care shall be taken when considering alert and action levels for cleanliness classes ISO Class 5 and cleaner
with low concentrations of particles. In these circumstances, the occurrence of “nuisance alarms” due to false counts and/or natural variability of
Frequent “nuisance”
particle concentration is more likely and should be avoided by careful selection of alert and action levels.
alarms should be avoided as they can lead to alarms being ignored by users.
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Alert and Action Limits, How to choose the right strategy
STRATEGY 1
• Establish a trigger threshold value based on a series of consecutively high readings.
– For example: 3 consecutive, 1 minute readings all above a specified level
Monitoring Data Particles
Alarm Level
16
14 Alarm Event
12
10
PARTICLES
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MINUTES
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Alert and Action Limits, How to choose the right strategy
STRATEGY 2
• Establish a trigger threshold value based on a high frequency of elevated readings. This method is
commonly referred as “x out of y”, where “x” is the number of events and “y” is the number of
minutes.
– For example, 3 out of the last 10 readings/minutes are above the specified alarm threshold
Monitoring Data Particles
Alarm Level
18
16
14
12
PARTICLES
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MINUTES
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Learn from FDA 483 Warning Letters
• Being compliant with any standard requires experience,
knowledge and a critical approach, enabling the harmonization
of regulation requirements with specific production
environments.
• Jumping on this task can be done well in advance by studying
the observations of FDA inspectors made to users in similar
situations.
• Several 483 warning letters have been redacted over the last
years, many of them strictly linked with monitoring plans' lack
of compliance. Some of them are summarized in Scott Sutton's
The Environmental Monitoring Program in a GMP
Environment.
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Learn from FDA 483 Warning Letters
• …Regarding the increased non- • This warning letter states the need of
routine surveillance monitoring having a monitoring plan in place, a
performed to further evaluate the description of the location to be
Building “123456” manufacturing tested and a specific sampling
facility, there was no plan in place method. Monitoring results are
specifying the locations to be tested, considered insufficient if they don't
method of sampling, and actions to support and link to a clear and
be taken when microbial approved plan.
contamination was noted…
ISO 14644-2:2015 - Learn from FDA 483 Warning Letters
• …the alert and action limits • This warning letter, dated 2001, requires the
established for the manufacturing cleanroom user to proactively and critically
areas are not based on historical review the sampling historical data, as it
must be referenced to correctly set up the
data taken from the EM Program…
appropriate alert and action levels.
• This requirement was likely difficult to
accomplish in 2001, but is now easily
achievable using the appropriate software
platform (CFR 21 part 11 compliant), capable
with a particle counter's data storage.
Conclusion
• The new changes described here will impact cleanroom classifications and
monitoring. Any company that needs to comply with this standard is required to
update their internal SOP in order to meet the new ISO 14644 requirements.
• ISO 14644-1/2:2015 are not only a new standards to be compliant with, but are also
beneficial tools to use in achieving mature cleanroom environmental control.
• The standard's main goal is to cultivate and promote a strong knowledge of
cleanroom performance inside every company.
• ISO 14644-1/2:2015 were published on December 15th, 2015. All users who want to
be compliant with this standard are required to take necessary action immediately.
Thank you for attending!
Daniele Pandolfi
Global Product Line Manager, Aerosol
dpandolfi@pmeasuring.com