Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The SES template has been created to simplify the process of proving structural equivalency.
As downloaded the spreadsheet assumes a baseline steel chassis design. The majority of the cells in the spreadsheet are
Cells shaded grey are dependant on the data entered in yellow cells, the formulae in these grey cells have been left visible
The vast majority of the tabs can be accessed using the hyperlinks on the cover sheet. If you enable macros when opening
There have been a few questions about how to handle bent/two piece tubes in place of a single baseline tube. If properly tr
stiffer and stronger than the baseline tube, so please ensure you include images of the tube(s) in the "Chassis Pics" tab for
of equivalence to the "Additional Info" tab if you deem it necessary. You do not need to adjust the number of tubes in the re
The SES has been extensively tested, but if you think you have found a mistake in the document or have any questions on
FSAE rules committee in the usual manner.
If you find a new problem with the SES template or require a clarification 72 hours or less before the SES submissi
proof of equivalency in the "Additional Info" tab as well as filing a Rules question.
Revisions:
V1.0 First release for 2016 rules
Updated monocoque attachment guidance notes to include definition of "edge distance"
Corrected missing conditional formatting in monocoque attachment tabs
V1.1 Added clarification regarding tube spacing for alternative tube thickness test samples
Added calculation tab for lower bulkhead support members with racks passing through round welded collars
Added EV SES tabs
V1.2 Corrected calculation of laminate gradient when rig compliance is not zero
V1.3 Corrected same issue as for V1.2 in Composite AIP tab - only affects teams running Composite AIPs and do not
V1.4 Corrected perimeter shear calculation error for Composite AIP so it now accounts for both the inner and outer sk
V1.5 Updated perimeter shear calculation in Composite AIP tab.
.
e cells in the spreadsheet are locked, you can only edit the cells shaded yellow.
rey cells have been left visible so you can see how the results are calculated.
enable macros when opening the document "Ctrl+e" will return you to the cover sheet.
gle baseline tube. If properly triangulated then the reinforced bent/two piece tube will be
s) in the "Chassis Pics" tab for the SES assessor to review. You may add additional proof
t the number of tubes in the relevant calculation tab.
ment or have any questions on how to use the template please submit a question to the
ess before the SES submission deadline please include your own
Submission Version
Original Submission
to resubmit your SES then please update the table below, indicating what changes you have made from the previous submission
Revision Comments
NA
Details of any rules clarifications must be referenced and appended in this tab.
Clarification ID
ny rules clarifications must be referenced and appended in this tab.
This form must be completed and submitted by all teams no later than the date specified in the Action Deadlines
on specific event website. The FSAE Technical Committee will review all submissions which deviate from the
FSAETM rules and reply with a decision about the requested deviation. All requests will have a confirmation of receipt
sent to the team. Structural Equivalency Spreadsheets (SES) must be submitted electronically in Microsoft Excel
Format (*.xls). The submissions must be named as follows: schoolname_ses.xls using the complete school name.
Please submit to the person indicated in the Action Deadlines for each event.
In the event that the FSAE Technical Committee requests additional information or calculations, teams have one
week from the date of request to submit the requested information.
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Team Contact NEDmotorsports Email Address NEDmotorsports@gmail.com
Faculty Advisor PROF MUSHAHID HUSSASIN HASHMI Email Address camd@neduet.edu.pk
Powertrain Type Internal Combustion
Is proof of equivalency for your design required for any of the rules?
No. Chassis does not deviate from baseline requirements
Baseline Alternative
Design Description and/or
Material Material Rule No. Rule Description
Material Used
Used Used
YES NO T3.11 Main Roll Hoop Tubing AISI 1020
YES NO T3.12 Front Roll Hoop Tubing AISI 1020
YES NO T3.13 Main Roll Hoop Bracing Tubing AISI 1020
YES NO T3.13 Main Hoop Bracing Support - Tube Frames AISI 1020
YES NO T3.14 Front Hoop Bracing - Tube Frames AISI 1020
YES NO T3.18 Front Bulkhead - Tube Frames AISI 1020
YES NO T3.19 Front Bulkhead Support - Tube Frames AISI 1020
YES NO T3.24 Side Impact Structure - Tube Frames AISI 1020
YES NO T5.4 Shoulder Harness Bar AISI 1020
YES NO T3.20 Impact Attenuator Anti-Intrusion Plate AISI 1020
N/A N/A T3.36 Front Hoop Bracing - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.31 Front Bulkhead - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.32 Front Bulkhead Support - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.33 Side Impact Structure - Monocoques, Side
N/A N/A T3.33 Side Impact Structure - Monocoques, Floor
N/A N/A T3.36 Main Hoop Bracing Support - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.34 Main Hoop Attachment - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.35 Front Hoop Attachment - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.36 Hoop Bracing Attach. - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.37 Impact Attenuator Attachment - Monocoques
N/A N/A T3.40 Safety Harness Attachment - Monocoques
N/A N/A EV3.4.6/7 N/A
N/A N/A EV3.4.8/9 N/A
YES NO EV3.4.4 N/A
YES NO EV4.2.2 N/A
Attachment Checklist (make sure all are included in your report)
P Receipt, letter of donation or proof for non-steel materials (composite, honeycomb, resin, etc)
P Properties for all non-steel materials
P Monocoque Laminate Test data and pictures
P Holes >4mm drilled in any regulated tubing require proof of equivalency, include area and moment of inertia
NOTE: THIS FORM AND THE APPROVED COPY OF THE SUBMISSION MUST BE PRESENTED
AT TECHNICAL INSPECTION AT EVERY FORMULA SAE EVENT ENTERED
Tube and Laminate Equivalency Tube 1 Tube 2 Tube 3 Composite
Yield as Welded
UTS as Welded
Outside Dimension
Outside Dimension
Max Bending Load
Wall thickness
Wall thickness
Wall thickness
EI / Safety Factor
Energy absorbed
Max deflection at
Tube Material
Tube Material
Tube Material
during bending
Dimension
Inner Skin
Thickness
Thickness
Tube type
Tube type
Tube type
Material
Outside
Panel
at UTS
Yield
Area
UTS
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Outer Skin
Thickness
Panel Height
FSAETM STRUCTURAL EQUIVALENCY SPREADSHEET - CHASSIS PICTURES
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Please attach pictures of the frame and/or monocoque in the table below for review during the SES process.
All tubes/lay-ups must be colour coded to show outer diameter and wall thickness. Three view drawings and
isometric views of the structure (CAD, FEA models, etc) are acceptable. Note: The final decision about all designs will
be made at technical inspection. Approval of an SES does not guarantee passing Tech. Inspection.
Images must include dimensions/labels indicating the following:
Angle of main and front hoops
Angle between main hoop bracing and main hoop
Distance from top of main hoop to main hoop brace attachment
Distance from top of front hoop to front hoop brace attachment
Outer diameter and wall thickness of all tubes / monocoque lay-up
Teams entering cars with EV Powertrains must show the location of all HV components in these images and
highlight them by colouring them orange.
BENDING TEST
LOAD APPLIED TO MAIN HOOP AND ENGINE MOUNTING POINTS= 36KN or 8093lbf
Maximum Deflection= 0.846in/rad. Or 0.014in/degree
Maximum Deflection=21.48mm/rad. Or 0.37mm/degree
Bending Stiffness= 9566.2lbf/in or 1675N/mm
TORSIONAL TEST
Maximum Turning Forces/ Couple Forces =2.5KN or 562lbf
Maximum Deflection= 0.8125rad. Or 0.0141 degree (inches)
20.6375rad Or 0.35814 degrees ( millimetres)
Torsional Rigidity= Force/ deflection = 562/0.8125=691 lbf.in/rad. Or = 39858 lbf.in/degrees
Force/ deflection = 2500/20.6375=121.14 N.mm/rad. Or = 6980.5N.mm/degrees
Material Data Sheet
Material Spreadsheet Code Steel Aluminium 1 Aluminium 2
Material name Steel Aluminium 1 Aluminium 2
Youngs Modulus, E 2.00E+11 7.00E+10 7.00E+10
Yield strength, Pa 3.05E+08 1.00E+00 2.00E+00
UTS, Pa 3.65E+08 1.00E+00 2.00E+00
Yield strength, welded, Pa 1.80E+08 1.00E+00 2.00E+00
UTS welded, Pa 3.00E+08 1.00E+00 2.00E+00
UTS shear, Pa 2.19E+08 1.00E+00 2.00E+00
Steel properties based on SAE 1010 and are given in Rule T3.4.1 Note 4. Per rule T3.
Results from extra physical test required by T3.31.3 should be entered in the "Other x"
If alternative joint tests to enable lower minimum wall thicknesses have been used then
Combinations other than those presented in the rules are acceptable, provided the sub
Note: for tube combinations with large outer diameters it is acceptable to increase the o
BASELINE JOINT
25.4mm x 2.4mm to 25.4mm x 1.2mm
Tubing only 25.4mm x 1.6mm to 25.4mm x 1.2mm
Composite only 25.4mm x 1.2mm to 25.4mm x 1.2mm
Tubes + composite 25.4mm x 1.2mm to 25.4mm x 1.2mm
Round
Square
Composite 1 Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Other 4 Other 5
T3.30_Laminate Your Mat. 1 Your Mat. 2 Your Mat. 3 Your Mat. 4 Your Mat. 5
0.00E+00 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
0.00E+00 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
0.00E+00 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
N/A 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
N/A 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
0.00E+00 1.00E+00 2.00E+00 3.00E+00 4.00E+00 5.00E+00
are given in Rule T3.4.1 Note 4. Per rule T3.6 all steels are treated equally and are to use the above properties.
y T3.31.3 should be entered in the "Other x" materials column as required.
nimum wall thicknesses have been used then indicate those used by selecting "YES" in the table below.
in the rules are acceptable, provided the substituted tube has equivalent EI (stiffness) and CSA (strength)
er diameters it is acceptable to increase the offset between the tube centre-lines in your test samples.
bove properties.
Main Hoop Structural Equivalency - note, only steel may be used
Material Property Baseline Your Tube Your Composite Your Total Outer Inner
Material type Steel Steel Composite 1 b (m) 0.25 0.25
Tubing Type Round Round NA h (m) 0.002 0.002
Material name /grade Steel Steel T3.30_Laminate
Youngs Modulus, E 2.00E+11 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 A1 (m^2) 5.00E-04 I1 (m^4) 1.67E-10
Yield strength, Pa 3.05E+08 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 A2 (m^2) 5.00E-04 I2 (m^4) 1.67E-10
UTS, Pa 3.65E+08 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 y1 (m) 0.001 Ic1 (m^4) 5.02E-08
Yield strength, welded, Pa 1.80E+08 1.80E+08 N/A y2 (m) 0.021 Ic2 (m^4) 5.02E-08
UTS welded, Pa 3.00E+08 3.00E+08 N/A Centroid (m) 0.0110 Ic12 (m^4) 1.00E-07
Number of tubes 2 2
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 1.20 1.8
Thickness of panel, mm 22
Thickness of core, mm 18
Thickness of inner skin, mm 2
Thickness of outer skin, mm 2
Panel height,mm 250
CAD Screenshots / Images proving all panel dimensions and any additional proof must be appended below
Material Property Baseline Your Tube Your Composite Your Total Outer Inner
Material type Steel Steel Composite 1 b (m) 0.1 0.1
Tubing Type Round Round NA h (m) 0.002 0.002
Material name /grade Steel Steel T3.30_Laminate
Youngs Modulus, E 2.00E+11 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 A1 (m^2) 2.00E-04 I1 (m^4) 6.67E-11
Yield strength, Pa 3.05E+08 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 A2 (m^2) 2.00E-04 I2 (m^4) 6.67E-11
UTS, Pa 3.65E+08 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 z1 (m) 0.001 Ic1 (m^4) 2.01E-08
Yield strength, welded, Pa 1.80E+08 1.80E+08 N/A z2 (m) 0.021 Ic2 (m^4) 2.01E-08
UTS welded, Pa 3.00E+08 3.00E+08 N/A Centroid (m) 0.0110 Ic12 (m^4) 4.01E-08
Number of tubes 1 1
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 1.60 2
Thickness of panel, mm 22
Thickness of core, mm 18
Thickness of inner skin, mm 2
Thickness of outer skin, mm 2
Panel height,mm (half width across top of chassis) 100
CAD Screenshots / Images proving all panel dimensions and any additional proof must be appended below
Thickness of panel, mm 22
Thickness of core, mm 18
Thickness of inner skin, mm 2
Thickness of outer skin, mm 2
Panel height,mm 60
CAD Screenshots / Images proving all panel dimensions must be appended below
Bulkhead Height
h2 (m)
Cutout Height
Number of tubes 3 20 0 0
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.8
Baseline design? YES
Thickness of panel, mm YES N/A N/A 26
Thickness of core, mm 20
Thickness of inner skin, mm 3
Thickness of outer skin, mm 3
Panel height,mm 150
Your Tube Your Tube Your Tube Your Tubes Composite Side Composite Floor
Material Property Baseline type 1 type 2 type 3 Total (Vertical) (Horizontal) Your Total Side Outer Inner
Material type Steel Steel Steel Steel Composite 1 Composite 1 b (m) 0.325 0.325
Tubing Type Round Round Square Round NA NA h (m) 0.005 0.005
Material name /grade Steel Steel Steel Steel T3.30_Laminate T3.30_Laminate
Youngs Modulus, E 2.00E+11 2.00E+11 2.00E+11 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 A1 (m^2) 1.63E-03 I1 (m^4) 3.39E-09
Yield strength, Pa 3.05E+08 3.05E+08 3.05E+08 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 A2 (m^2) 1.63E-03 I2 (m^4) 3.39E-09
UTS, Pa 3.65E+08 3.65E+08 3.65E+08 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 y1 (m) 0.0025 Ic1 (m^4) 3.69E-07
Yield strength, welded, Pa 1.80E+08 1.80E+08 1.80E+08 1.80E+08 N/A N/A y2 (m) 0.0325 Ic2 (m^4) 3.69E-07
UTS welded, Pa 3.00E+08 3.00E+08 3.00E+08 3.00E+08 N/A N/A Centroid (m) 0.0175 Ic12 (m^4) 7.38E-07
Number of tubes 1 1
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 2.4 2.6
Thickness of panel, mm
Thickness of core, mm
Thickness of inner skin, mm
Thickness of outer skin, mm
Panel height,mm
CAD Screenshots / Images proving all panel dimensions and any additional proof must be appended below
All Dimensions are in mm
Tubing only
22
18
2
2
100
Member 3_4 brace @ harness bar_to_harness bar @ main hoop 25.4 2.4 1.368E-01
Member 3_5 brace @ harness bar_to_brace @ main bar 25.4 1.2 1.368E-01
Member 3_4 brace @ harness bar_to_harness bar @ main hoop 25.4 2.4 1.368E-01
Member 3_5 brace @ harness bar_to_brace @ main bar 25.4 1.2 1.368E-01
- Designs that do not have one continuous 1"x0.095" tube attach
Coordinates
x y z
Point harness attachment
Point point_1
Point point_2
Point point_3
Point point_4
Point point_5
Point point_6
Point point_7
Material Proper
Material Proper
Safety factor
Buckling Column
Stress
stress Buckling
-304.9 2.68 13.16
-304.9 1.47 13.16
-302.0 2.53 NA
200,000
1
365.0
305.0
300.0
180.0
219.0
Safety factor
Buckling Column
Stress
stress Buckling
-304.9 3.85 8.33
-304.9 2.38 8.33
YES
NO
CAD Screenshots / Images proving all panel dimensions and any additional proof must be appended below
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for force at first and second peak (see monocoque guidance tab)
ymax (N) 0
σshear (Mpa) 0.0 Shear strength of skin, used for attachment calcs where appropriate
FSAETM SES - LAMINATE TEST RESULTS
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height (should be 275mm, alternative sizes must be agreed in advance)
b (mm) 25 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 2.5 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 2.5 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm4) 260677 Second moment of area
E (GPa) 0.0 Skin modulus of elasticity
σUTS(MPa) 0 UTS of skins
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Note: It is acceptable to use the derived properties from the T3.30.3 test elsewhere if -
- The ply schedule of the skins is the same but the core is thicker or thinner.
- The ply schedule of the skins is the same but the skins are thicker or thinner.
- Combination of the above
This tab is only required for all areas of the monocoque that do not satisy these conditions.
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height
b (mm) 18 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 1 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 1 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm ) 49683 Second moment of area
4
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for force at first and second peak (see guidance notes)
ymax (N) 0 (Determines Shear Strength for T3.34 where appropriate)
Peak 2 (N) 0 FAIL
σshear (Mpa) 0.0 Shear strength of skin, used for attachment calcs where appropriate
FSAETM SES - T3.33.4 PERIMETER SHEAR TEST RESULTS
Enter values for force at first and second peak (see guidance notes)
ymax (N) 0 (Determines Shear Strength for T3.33)
Peak 2 (N) 0 FAIL
σshear (Mpa) 0.0 Shear strength of skin, used for attachment calcs where appropriate
FSAETM SES - OTHER MATERIAL "X" SHEAR TEST RESULTS
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for force at first and second peak (see monocoque guidance tab)
ymax (N) 0
σshear (Mpa) 0.0 Shear strength of skin, used for attachment calcs where appropriate
Main Hoop Attachments
Insert images of each attachment point proving the values entered above:
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
Front Hoop Attachments
Insert images of fully laminated hoop or attachments proving the values entered above:
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
FAIL
Monocoque Hoop Bracing Attachments
Insert images of each attachment point proving the values entered above:
Insert images of each attachment point proving the values entered above:
FSAETM STRUCTURAL EQUIVALENCY SPREADSHEET - HARNESS ATTACHMENT TEST RESULTS
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Please use this sheet to prove your accumulator container design complies with Rule EV3.4.6/7
Enter annotated images/drawings below showing your design complies with all requirements of EV3.4.6
Enter proof of compliance with EV3.4.7 below
FSAETM SES - EV3.4.6j LAMINATE TEST RESULTS - FLOOR
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height
b (mm) 10 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 1 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 1 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm ) 16683 Second moment of area
4
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height
b (mm) 10 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 1 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 1 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm ) 16683 Second moment of area
4
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height
b (mm) 10 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 1 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 1 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm ) 16683 Second moment of area
4
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter details of test setup, panel core and skin thicknesses below
l (mm) 400 Panel Support Span
h (mm) 275 Panel Height
b (mm) 10 Core Thickness
t1 (mm) 1 Inner Skin Thickness
t2 (mm) 1 Outer Skin Thickness
I (mm ) 16683 Second moment of area
4
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for force at first and second peak (see monocoque guidance tab)
ymax (N) 0
Material Property Baseline Floor Your Floor Baseline Ext. Wall Your Ext. Wall Baseline Int. Wall Your Ext Wall Baseline Cover Your Cover
Material type Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite Steel Composite
Material name /grade Steel Your Floor Steel Your Ext. Walls Steel Your Int. Walls Steel Your Cover
Youngs Modulus, E 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 2.00E+11 0.00E+00 2.00E+11 0.00E+00
Yield strength, Pa 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 3.05E+08 0.00E+00 3.05E+08 0.00E+00
UTS, Pa 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 3.65E+08 0.00E+00 3.65E+08 0.00E+00
Yield strength, welded, Pa 1.80E+08 N/A 1.80E+08 N/A 1.80E+08 N/A 1.80E+08 N/A
UTS welded, Pa 3.00E+08 N/A 3.00E+08 N/A 3.00E+08 N/A 3.00E+08 N/A
UTS shear, Pa 2.19E+08 0.00E+00 2.19E+08 0.00E+00 2.19E+08 0.00E+00 2.19E+08 0.00E+00
Thickness of panel, mm 1.25 12 0.9 12 0.9 12 0.9 12
Thickness of inner skin, mm N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1
Thickness of outer skin, mm N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1
Panel height/width,mm 150 150 300 300 250 250 150 150
I, m^4 2.441E-11 9.1E-09 1.823E-11 1.820E-08 1.519E-11 1.517E-08 9.113E-12 9.100E-09
EI 4.88E+00 0.00E+00 3.65E+00 0.00E+00 3.04E+00 0.00E+00 1.82E+00 0.00E+00
Area, mm^2 187.5 300 270 600 225 500 135 300
UTS, N 6.84E+04 0.00E+00 9.86E+04 0.00E+00 8.21E+04 0.00E+00 4.93E+04 0.00E+00
Safety Factors
Tension 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Bending 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Shear 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL
Accumulator Attachments
Insert images of each attachment point & calculations proving the required properties:
Each of the following must be proved: The attachment of any brackets to the container is as at least as strong
If brackets are bolted to the container, that there is sufficient shear area
For monocoques, that each attachment point has >=20kN x the number
ner is as at least as strong as 20kN x the number of fasteners per bracket
ere is sufficient shear area under the head of the bolts/washers so the perimeter shear strength is >=20kN x the number of fasteners pe
has >=20kN x the number of fasteners per bracket in any direction (please see the Comp IAD attachment calcs for an example)
x the number of fasteners per bracket
calcs for an example)
Accumulator Protection
Enter construction type Tubing only
Number of tubes 3 3 0
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 1.6 1.6 1.6
Baseline design?
Thickness of panel, mm YES N/A
Thickness of core, mm
Thickness of inner skin, mm
Thickness of outer skin, mm
Panel height,mm
0
25.4
1.6
YES
N/A 26
20
3
3
300
No tubes
Number of tubes 3 3 0
Tube OD, mm 25.4 25.4 25.4
Wall, mm 1.2 1.2 1.2
Baseline design?
Thickness of panel, mm YES N/A
Thickness of core, mm
Thickness of inner skin, mm
Thickness of outer skin, mm
Panel height,mm
0
25.4
1.2
YES
N/A 26
20
3
3
300
No tubes
Your Tube
Your Tube + Insert
OD, m 0.0254
Wall, m 0.0012
I, m^4 6.69592E-09 0.00E+00
EI 1.34E+03 0.00E+00 0.0
Tube area, mm^2 91.2 0.0 NA
Insert area, mm^2 NA 0.0 NA
Yield tensile strength, N 2.78E+04 0.00E+00 0.0
UTS, N 3.33E+04 0.00E+00 0.0
Max load at mid span to give UTS for 1m long tube, N 7.70E+02 0.00E+00 0.0
Max deflection at baseline load for 1m long tube, m 1.20E-02 0.00E+00 999.0
Energy absorbed up to UTS, J 4.61E+00 0.00E+00 0.0
Note - the calculations above take account of the "as welded condition" strength reduction
Insert calculations or CAD screenshot proving tube + insert area and second moment
of area below.
Welded Steering Rack Collar in Bulkhead Support Tube
Safety Factor
Insert images of test sample and data from pull tests used to derive shear strength below:
FSAETM STRUCTURAL EQUIVALENCY SPREADSHEET - CONTINUATION TAB
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Please use this sheet to include additional information required for your proof of equivalency that isn't covered by the
standard forms e.g. material receipts. This tab may be copied if one page isn't sufficient.
FSAETM SES - T3.6 ALTERNATIVE JOINT TEST RESULTS
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for maximum load sustained for all four samples below
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for maximum load sustained for all four samples below
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for maximum load sustained for all four samples below
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for maximum load sustained for all four samples below
University Name NEDUET Car No.(s) & Event(s) 110 & FS-East
Enter values for maximum load sustained for all four samples below
2. Chassis with a structure as per 1., but where >=100% equivalence is not shown on the
flat panel calc alone.
In this case additional proof of equivalence is required, by showing the actual chassis
design is >=100% equivalent, it is acceptable to include half of the chassis in this proof.
Using a CAD measure of the cross-section, or other appropriate method, provide proof
of the second moment of area and area of the monocoque skins.
Multiply this measured "I" by the "E" derived from the required physical test to prove the
buckling modulus is equivalent.
The measured "I" must be transposed from the cross-section centroid to a reference
co-ordinate system on the chassis centre-line, and the same completed for the baseline
tubes.
The measured "A" must be multiplied by the physical test derived skin UTS to prove
the strength of the section is >=100%
3. Teams with non square/rectangular structures must complete an analysis similar to
that required in scenario 2, but at a cross-section through the structure where the
equivalent tube offset ("d" in the image below) is ~ 75mm.
FSAETM MONOCOQUE EQUIVALENCY GUIDANCE NOTES - FRONT HOOP BRACING
There are two scenarios for front hoop bracing support equivalency.
1. Chassis where, when calculated as a flat panel, half of the width of the upper horizontal
panel between the top of the front bulkhead and the top of the front hoop shows >=100%
equivalency to 1 front hoop bracing tube.
In this case no additional proof is required, but images of the chassis proving the panel
width entered must be supplied.
2. Chassis where the flat panel calculation shows <100% equivalence to 1 front hoop
bracing tube.
In this case additional proof of equivalence is required, by showing the actual chassis
design is >=100% equivalent.
Using a CAD measure of the cross-section, or other appropriate method, provide proof
of the second moment of area and area of the monocoque skins.
The height of the moncoque section used for comparison must not exceed 50mm
The measured "A" must be multiplied by the physical test derived skin UTS to prove
the strength of the section is >=100%
FSAETM MONOCOQUE EQUIVALENCY GUIDANCE NOTES - FRONT BULKHEAD SUPPORT
There are two scenarios for front bulkhead bracing support equivalency.
1. Chassis where, when calculated as a flat panel, the vertical panel between the
front bulkhead and front hoop shows >=100% to 3 front bulkhead support tubes.
In this case no additional proof is required, but images of the chassis proving the panel
height entered must be supplied.
2. Chassis where the flat panel calculation shows >33% but <100% equivalence to 3
front bulkhead support tubes.
(If the flat panel calculation shows <33% equivalence the panel core and/or skin
thickness must be increased and the physical tests repeated until >33% is achieved)
In this case additional proof of equivalence is required, by showing the actual chassis
design is >=100% equivalent.
Using a CAD measure of the cross-section, or other appropriate method, provide proof
of the second moment of area and area of the monocoque skins.
Multiply this measured "I" by the "E" derived from the required physical test to prove the
buckling modulus is equivalent.
The measured "I" must be transposed from the cross-section centroid to a reference
co-ordinate system on the chassis centre-line, and the same completed for the baseline
tubes.
The measured "A" must be multiplied by the physical test derived skin UTS to prove
the strength of the section is >=100%
FSAETM IA AI PLATE GUIDANCE NOTES
2. Composite AIP used, proof of equivalency using material properties derived from
three point bending and shear tests.
In this case:
Safety factors for bending and perimeter shear must both be >=1
In this case:
Unlike other areas of the monocoque, no allowance for geometric form is allowed.
For 2015 the rules have changed to prove equivalence on absorbed energy rather
than strength. This evaluation is based on the mandatory physical test data.
The requirement to prove buckling modulus remains, but with a more stringent requirement
where:
Note: In practical terms it is impossible for a car with rules compliant ride height to
have a panel height greater than 325mm, panel heights greater than this will
return a null value for EI
- The horizontal floor (up-to the centre of the chassis), when calculated as flat-panel
must have equivalent EI to one baseline side-impact tube.
When entering peak loads please ensure they are in accordance with the image below:
Note: If the first peak is higher than the second then it can be used for the punch through
strength requirement.
FSAETM MONOCOQUE ATTACHMENTS GUIDANCE NOTES
Note: Brackets which have no "form" or gusseting are not acceptable as they will fail in
All monocoque attachment tabs follow the same order, stepping through each key element bending at <30KN
from Row 13 to Row 20.
Below are some examples of brackets which are not acceptable:
The images below show an example hoop attachment, in this case the following data
would be entered:
Row 13: Total weld length of all welds joining the hoop tube to the bracket
Row 14: Thickness of the bracket joined to the hoop
Row 15: Outside perimeter of the bracket joined to the hoop
Row 16: Thickness of the laminate skin in contact with the bracket joined to the hoop
Row 17: Combined outside perimeter of all inserts in the core material
Row 18: Thickness of the laminate skin in contact with the backing plate
Row 19: Thickness of the backing plate
Row 20: Outside perimeter of the backing plate
Row 21: Distance from bolt centreline to nearest "free edge"
Entering the combined perimeter of all inserts between the outer and inner skins is
optional, provided the strength in both loading directions is >=30kN without their inclusion.