Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
- - ~ ~-~,~,~
Environmental Pollution 69 (1991) 69-78 • .~
B. D . T r i p a t h i * & S u r e s h C. S h u k l a
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
domestic sewage mixed with industrial effluents is discharged into the river
Ganga. In the discharge areas, microbial decomposition of these substances
exerts high BOD, creates anaerobic conditions and the receiving aquatic
bodies become septic and emit foul smells. Under these conditions aquatic
life suffers, resulting in a loss of productivity of the natural waters and a
deterioration of water quality to such an extent that the water becomes
unusable. Therefore, proper treatment of the sewage is urgently needed.
The use of aquatic macrophytes to remove nutrients from sewage and
industrial effluents has been suggested by Boyd (1968), Wolverton &
McDonald (1979), Paverly (1983), Oron et al. (1986), Sutton & Ornes (1975),
Reddy (1983), Shukla & Tripathi (1989) and Tripathi et al. (1990). Also, in
recent years algae have been used extensively in treatment systems
(Christensen et al., 1979; Shelef et al., 1980; Rodrignes & Oliveira, 1987;
Tam & Wong, 1989).
Aquatic macrophytes can be effectively used to reduce pollutant levels in
water bodies (Boyd, 1968; Lakshman, 1979; Stowell et al., 1981; Reddy et al.,
1983; Hauser, 1984; Reddy & De Busk, 1985; De Busk et al., 1989) and their
biomass may be used for biogas production (Shialipour & Smith, 1984)
animal feed (Bagnall et al., 1974), fibre (Nolan & Kirmse, 1974) and compost
(Parra & Hortenstein, 1974). The use of water hyacinth not only helps in
BOD depletion, but also reduces suspended solids, NO3--N, PO4--P, Na,
K, Ca, Mg and other minerals (Tripathi et al., 1990). This plant can absorb toxic
substances, such as cadmium, lead, nickel, mercury, copper, chromium,
silver, phenol and some potential carcinogens (Wolverton & McDonald,
1979). These aquatic plants can absorb these elements at concentrations
between 4 000 and 20 000 times those in water (Wolverton & McDonald,
1979). The effect of nutrient availability on water hyacinth standing crop and
detritus deposition have been studied by Thomas et aL, 1989.
However, most of the past studies were restricted to one kind of aquatic
macrophyte or alga for wastewater treatment. Therefore, a systematic
sewage treatment technique was designed to evaluate the potential of
combining water hyacinth and algae (Microcystis aeruginosa, Seenedesmus
quadricauda, Chlorella vulgaris, Euglena viridis) in improving water quality.
TREATED
WATER
]--_---_----:_-S-~_-
t -J
ALGAL C U L T U R E EICHHORNIA,-
CRA URE-I CRASSIPES CULTURE-II
Stage I treatment
The wastewater from the aspirator bottle was allowed to flow into the
bottom of the first water hyacinth culture tank through a 1"25-cm pipe
regulated by an adjustable valve. The water-holding capacity of tank was
200 litres. Ten water hyacinth plants were grown in the wastewater as cover
crop and kept exposed to sunlight. Regular harvesting of the older plants
was done once a week, so that 15-20% of the water surface in the tank
remained free from the plants. The retention period for this water hyacinth
culture was 15d.
Stage II treatment
Treated wastewater from the first water hyacinth culture tank was allowed
to overflow, through an outlet pipe fixed 8 cm below the top of the tank, into
an algal culture tank. The capacity of this algal tank was about 60 litres.
Algae were allowed to grow for 5 days in the partly treated wastewater
received from the first water hyacinth culture.
After 5 days, water from the algal culture tank was again allowed to overflow
into the second water hyacinth culture tank-II with a capacity of 200 litres.
72 B. D. Tripathi, Suresh C. Shukla
At this stage, water hyacinth was again grown as a cover crop for a further 9
days. The treated water from this second water hyacinth culture was
discharged as purified water.
Water samples were collected every morning from the outlet of each
treatment tank. All the determinations, i.e. suspended solids, total alkalinity,
BOD, COD, EC, acidity, NO3--N, PO4--P, total hardness, cadmium,
coliform bacteria, phytoplankton and zooplankton density were done
following the methods descrived in APHA (1985). Due to high variation, the
pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were determined twice a day at 09.00 h and
13.00 h. DO was determined by a Century automatic 0 2 analyser. An atomic
absorption spectrophotometer (model IL 751) was used to determine the
cadmium, copper, iron, nickel, zinc and lead concentrations in the water
samples.
Phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in the water were analysed
at three different stages in the aquaculture. The phytoplankton density was
estimated by the microtransect method described by Lackey (1938) and
subsequently modified by Edmondson (1974). Zooplankton were counted
by the method described by Jhingran et aL (1969), and coliform bacteria were
estimated by the presumptive and confirmatory test using MacConkey's
broth (APHA, 1985). The statistical significance of variation in the data with
respect to days for different parameters was judged with the help of the 'F'
(Variance ratio) test.
RESULTS A N D DISCUSSION
The average data obtained over a 6-month experimental period are given in
Table 1.
v~
=_..
< I I I ~ ~ ~ I I
~ ° ° ° ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ +1
+1+1+1+1+1 +1+1+1+1+1+1+1+t ~1+1 x - x~
~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~~o 6 _ ~
:? ~ _ I I ~ ~ ~ I /
L~
] ~l ÷l +l ~ ~ +l +l +l +l +1 +l +l +1 +l +1 × - L
~ o ~o ~ ~ o~+1
@ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--
---,
I
= .~
[=-;
~= _o o~O~O'~O=Oo ~o .=~o-
+t
74 B. D. Tripathi, Suresh C. Shukla
The water quality from the first water hyacinth culture was quite good with
respect to BOD, suspended solids, PO4--P, NO3--N, N H 4 - - N , COD
and coliform bacteria count. However, the DO concentration was not high
enough to constitute good quality water. For this reason, algae, such as
Chlorella vulgar&, Microcyst& aerug&osa, Scenedesmus falcatus and
Chlamydomonas mirabilis, were cultured in this second stage in order to
increase the concentration of DO through their photosynthetic activities.
During 5 days' retention time of the algal culture, BOD was further
reduced from 70-0 mg litre- 1 to 40.5 mg litre - 1, total alkalinity from 470 mg
litre-1 to 290 mg litre-1, PO4__ P from 4.65 to 3"05 mg litre-1, NH4__ N
from 39-4 to 16.5 mg litre- 1, COD from 567 to 450mg litre- 1, EC from 850
to 775#S, total hardness from 64 to 49.5mg litre -1 and total coliform
bacterial count from 2.14 x 105 to 0-76 x 155 cells 100m1-1. Calcium
concentration was further reduced from 0.96 to 0.68 mg litre-1
Thus the incorporation of the algal culture after the first water hyacinth
culture resulted in an overall improvement of water quality. However, the
growth and multiplication of algae increased the suspended solids from
135 mg litre- 1 to 205 mg litre- 1. The pH was 7.25 at 09"00 h, but it was 9.04
at 13"00h. This increase in the pH at 13-00h was possibly due to active
photosynthetic activity during the day, resulting in a reduction of CO 2 in the
water. The DO content of the water at 09.00h was 3"64mglitre-~, but it
increased at 13.00h to 14-5mglitre-1 due to photosynthetic activity of
algae. Oxygen remains in the water in supersaturation state. The
p h y t o p l a n k t o n population increased from 775 × 10 3 to 1598 × 104
individuals litre-1. Similarly, the zooplankton population increased from
210 to 6759 individuals litre-1.
Thus, the outlet water from the algal culture was much improved with
respect to BOD, NO3--N, PO4--P, N H 4 - - N , pH, DO, COD, hardness,
electrical conductance, coliform bacterial count and zooplankton numbers.
However, the concentration of suspended solids increased due to the
presence of algal cells and, as a result, the water was unfit for discharge,
Hence, a further water hyacinth culture-II was used to reduce the suspended
solids before discharge of treated wastewater.
Biological treatment of wastewater by selected aquatic plants 75
due to absorption of the liquid through the surface of roots of the plant. It is
also possible that the roots may be absorbing some materials which act as
peptising agents for the colloids. The removal of biodegradable organics is
also accomplished by the symbiotic activity of a large number of aerobic
bacteria that grow on the roots of the plant. These aerobic bacteria get their
required oxygen through the vascular stem of the plant.
The present experiment, conducted with water hyacinth and a few algal
species (Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus quadricauda, Microcystis aerugi-
nosa, Euglena viridis) revealed that the use of aquatic plants for the treatment
of sewage is a cheap and convenient technology. Controlled growth of plants
can produce cost-effective, advanced wastewater treatment systems in warm
and temperate climates. It is suggested that it will be more economic and
desirable to employ such techniques on commercial scale. Plant material
harvested from this type of system can be further processed into usable
products like compost, paper and other products. Anaerobic digestion of the
harvested biomass produced (60-80%), 374 litres methane kg-1 dry plant.
One hectare can produce 600 kg of dry plant material per day, which can
produce 224 400 litres of biogas hectare-1 d-1. With metal-contaminated
plants, the rate of production of gas is even faster (Haque & Sharma, 1986).
When the water hyacinth plants contain heavy metals, such as Ni and Cd,
the methane content in the biogas goes up by 91.9%.
The three-stage system of wastewater treatment described is probably the
cheapest and most economic method which can be adopted throughout
warmer and temperate climates.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
American Public Health Association (1985). Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater. APHA, AWWA and WPCE, 16th Am. Public
Health Assoc. Byrd Progress, Springfield, New York.
Aowai, A. F. S. A. & Singh, J. (1981). Water hyacinth for treating dairy waste. Proc.
Environ. Guidelines for selected projects, 16-18 Oct., pp. 1-5.
Biological treatment of wastewater by selected aquatic plants 77
Bagnall, L. O., Baldwin, J. A. & Hentges, J. F. (1974). Processing and storage of water
hyacinth silage. Hyacinth Control J., 12, 73-9.
Boyd, C. E. (1968). Fresh water plants: A potential source of protein. Econ. Bot., 22,
359-68.
Chevalier, P. & Noue, J. D. (1985). Efficiency of immobilized hyperconcentration
algae from ammonium and orthophosphate removal from wastewater.
Biotech. Lett., 7, 395-400.
Christensen, E. R., Scherrig, J. & Dixon, P. S. (1979). Effects of manganese, copper
and lead on Selenastrum capricorhutum and Chlorella stigmatophora. Water
Research, 13, 79-92.
De Busk, T. A., Reddy, K. R., Hayes, T. D. & Schwegier, B. R. Jr (1989). Performance
of a pilot-scale hyacinth-based secondary treatment system. J. War. Poll. Cont.
Fed., 61, 1217-24.
Edmondson, W. J. (1974). Fresh Water Biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,
London.
Glasstone, S. 1965. Text Book of Physical Chemistry, 2nd edn.
Haque, A. & Sharma, S. (1986). Water hyacinth to fight water pollution. Science
Reporter. Dec., 757-62.
Hauser, J. R. (1984). Use of water hyacinth aquatic treatment systems for ammonia
control and effluent polishing. J. War. Poll. Cont. Fed., 56, 219-26.
Jhingran, V. G., Natrajan, A. V., Banerjee, S. M. & David, A. (1969). Methodology
on Reservoir Fisheries Investigation in India. Bull. Cent. InL Fish. Res. Inst., 13,
108-112.
Lackey, I. B. (1938). Public Health Reports, 53, 2080-93.
Lakshman, G. (1979). An ecosystem approach to the treatment of waste water. J.
Environ. Qual., 8, 353-61.
Nolan, W. J. & Kirmse, D. W. (1974). The paper making properties of water
hyacinth. Hyacinth Control J., 12, 90-7.
Ovon, G., Porath, D. & Wildschut, I. R. (1936). Wastewater treatment and
renovation by different duckweed species. J. Environ. Engineers, 112, 247-63.
Parra, J. V. & Hortenstein, C. C. (1974). Plant nutitionai content of some Florida
water hyacinth and response by pearl millet to incorporation of water hyacinth
in three soil types. Hyacinth Control J., 12, 85-90.
Paverly, J. H. (1983). Element accumulation and release by macrophytes in a
wetland stream. J. Environ. QuaL, 14, 137-43.
Reddy, K. R. (1983). Fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in a waste water retention
reservoir containing aquatic macrophytes. J. Environ. Qual., 12, 137-41.
Reddy, K. R., Sutton, D. L. & Bowes, C. E. (1983). Biomass production of fresh
water aquatic plants in Florida. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soe. FI., 42, 28-40.
Reddy, K. R. & De Busk, W. F. (1985). Nutrient removal potential of selected
aquatic macrophytes. J. Environ. Qual., 14, 459-62.
Rodrignes, A. M. & Oliveira, J. F. S. (1987). Treatment of wastewater from the
tomato concentrate industry in high rate algal ponds. Wat. Sci. Tech., 19, 43-9.
Shelef, G., Azov, Y., Moraine, R. & Oron, G. (1980). Algal mass production as an
integral part of a wastewater treatment and reclamation system. In Algae
Biomass Production and Use, ed. G. Shelef & C.J. Soader, Elsevier North
Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp. 163-89.
Shialipour, A. & Smith, P. H. (1984). Conversion of biomass into methane gas.
Biomass, 6, 85-94.
78 B. D. Tripathi, Suresh C. Shukla