Department of Education

Region XI
Division of Island Garden City of Samal
ANONANG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Island Garden City of Samal
School ID: 128695

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM MASTER TEACHERS I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division
:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

per Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfatory Unsatisfactory Poor
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES MOV Q E T RATING
QET
objective 5 4 3 2 1
 Basic Content 1.Modeled 7.5% Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable 1. Classroom Observation Tool 0 0 0 0.000
Education applications of applications of applications of applications of evidence was ( COT ) rating sheet and/or
Knowledge effective
Services content content knowledge content content shown inter-observer agreement form
and applications of knowledge within within and across knowledge within knowledge within about effective applications of
Pedagogy content and across curriculum teaching and across and across content knowledge within and
(22.5%) knowledge curriculum areas as shown in curriculum curriculum across curriculum teaching area
teaching areas as MOV 1 with a rating teaching areas as teaching areas as
within and
shown in MOV 1 of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 2. Lesson plans/modified
across with a rating of 8 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 DLLs used in demonstration
curriculum teaching highlighting integration
teaching areas. of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
3.Instructional
materials developed highlighting
effective application of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
Quality 4. Performance
tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Results of assessment
used in demonstration teaching
highlighting mastery of lessons
learned
6. Others (Please
specify and provide annotations)

Modeled effective
applications of Submitted 3 Submitted 2
content lessons using lessons using
No
knowledge within MOV 1 and MOV 1 and Submitted any 1
acceptable
Efficiency and across supported by supported by of the given
evidence
curriculum any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV
was shown
teaching areas as other given other given
shown in MOV 1 MOV MOV
with a rating of 7

Modeled effective
applications of
content Submitted
Submitted MOV No
knowledge within MOV were Submitted MOV
were distributed acceptable
Timeliness and across distributed was completed
across 2 evidence
curriculum across 3 in only 1 quarter
quarters was shown
teaching areas as quarters
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6
 Basic Content 1. Copy of the research proposal
Education focused on enriching knowledge
Knowledge
Services of content and pedagogy
and 2. Proof
Pedagogy Conducted, of participation and/or
Conducted and
(22.5%) completed and Conducted action Proposed action No acceptable contribution to a collaborative
completed action research (e.g. e-mail, actual
Quality disseminated research with research with evidence was
research with output submitted, terms of
action research colleagues colleagues shown
colleagues reference, etc.)
with colleagues
3. Certified completed
collaborative research focused
on enriching knowledge of
2. Collaborated content and pedagogy
with colleagues 4. Proof
in the conduct of dissemination of research
findings with colleagues
and application 5.
of research to 7.5% Proof of utilization of research 0 0.000
enrich findings 6.
knowledge of Submitted at No acceptable Others (Please specify and
Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1
Efficiency least 4 of the evidence was provide annotations)
content and the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
given MOV show
pedagogy.

Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the

No acceptable
research report research report research report research report
Timeliness evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating
shown
period period period period

3. Developed Demonstrated 1.Classroom observation tool

effective teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
and applied
strategies to Demonstrated Demonstrated observer agreement form about
effective promote critical Demonstrated effective teaching effective teaching using effective teaching
teaching and creative effective teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to promote critical
strategies to thinking, as wellstrategies to promote critical promote critical and creative teaching, as well as
as other higher promote critical and and creative and creative No acceptable other higherorder thinking skills
promote critical
Quality order thinking creative thinking, as thinking, as well thinking, as well evidence was
and creative skills as shown in
well as other higher- as other higher- as other higher shown 2. Lesson plans/modified
thinking, as well MOV 1 with a order thinking skills order thinking order thinking DLLs used in demonstration
as other higher- rating of 8 as shown in MOV 1 skills as shown in skills as shown teaching highlighting different
with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a teaching strategies that develop
order thinking
rating of 6 rating of 5 critical and creative thinking
skills. and/or other HOTS 3.
Instructional materials
highlighting different teaching
7.5% strategies that develop critical 0 0.000
Submitted 4 or Submitted 2 Submitted 1 and creative thinking and/or
Submitted 3 lessons other HOTS
more lessons as lessons as lesson as
as evidently shown
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown No acceptable
in MOV 1 and 4. Performance ta sks/test
Efficiency in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any 1 material(s) used in
supported by any supported by any supported by any shown
of the other MOV demonstration teaching
1 of the other 1 of the other of the other MOV
given
MOV given MOV given given
5. Results of assessment used
in the demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please
 in the demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please
specify and provide annotations)

Timeliness

Basic Learning
Education Modeled and Modeled and Modeld and
Environment Modeled and shared
Services shared effective shared effective shared effective
and classroom
effective classroom
classroom classroom
Diversity of 4.Worked with management
management management management
strategies that
Learners colleagues to strategies that
engage learners in
strategies that strategies that 1. Classroom observation tool
No acceptable
(22.5%) model and share engage learners engage learners engage learners (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Quality activities/ tasks evidence was
in activities/ tasks in activities/ tasks in activities/ tasks observer agreement form about
done in different shown
effective done in different done in different done in different sharing effective techniques in
physical learning
techniques in physical learning
environments as
physical learning physical learning the management of classroom
environments as environments as environments as structure
the shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 2. Lesson
management of with a rating of 8
with a rating of 7
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 plans/modified DLLs used in
classroom demonstration teaching
structure to highlighting effective classroom
engage management strategies that
engage learners in
learners, 7.5% Submitted at Submitted at activities/tasks in different
0 0.000
Submitted at least 3
individually or in least 4 lessons
lessons supported
least 3 lessons
Sunmitted any 1 No acceptable physical learning environments
supported by supported by
groups, in Efficiency by MOV 1 and any of the acceptable evidence was 3.
MOV 1 and any MOV 1 and any Minutes of LAC highlighting the
meaningful 1 of the other
1 of the other
1 of the other
MOV shown
acceptable MOV sharing on effective classroom
exploration, acceptable MOV acceptable MOV management techniques
discovery and 4.
hands-on Instructional materials used in
activities within demonstration teaching
5. Others
a range of (Please specify and provide
physical learning annotations)
environments Timeliness

5.Exhibited Exhibited
Classroom observation tool
Exhibited Exhibited (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
effective and effective and
Exhibited effective effective and effective and observer agreement form about
constructive constructive
and constructive constructive constructive effective teacher management
behavior behavior
behavior behavior behavior of learner behavior using the
management
management skills by applying
management skills management management following strategies:
by applying positive skills by applying skills by applying No acceptable 1.
skills by positive and non-
Quality and non-violent positive and non- positive and non- evidence Providing motivation
applying positive violent discipline
discipline to ensure violent discipline violent discipline shown 2. Praising the
and non-violent to ensure learners/Giving positive
learning focused to ensure to ensure
learningfocused
discipline to environments
environments learning focused learning focused feedback
shown in MOV 1 environments environments 3. Setting house
ensure learning- shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 rules/guidelines
focused with a rating of 8
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 4. Ensuring learners’
7.5% 0 0.000
environments. active participation
5.
Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving
equal opportunities to learners
 environments. active participation
5.
Allowing learners to express
Applied at least 7 Applied at least 7 Applied any of their ideas/opinions
Applied at least 7 of
of the given of the given the given No acceptable 6. Giving
the given strategies
Efficiency strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence
as observed in 3 equal opportunities to learners
observed in at observed in 2 observed in only shown
lessons
least 4 lessons lessons 1 lessons 7. Encouraging learners to
ask questions
8. Others
(Please specify and provide
Timeliness annotations)

Basic Learning 6. Worked with

Education
Environment colleagues to
Services
and share
Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s,
Diversity of differentiated, Worked with Worked with highlighting one’s sharing of
colleagues at Worked with
Learners developmentally least in the colleagues in the
colleagues in the colleagues but no No acceptable
strategies on differentiated and
(22.5%) appropriate Quality department or evidence of evidence
developmentally-appropriate
district/cluster school level to share
grade level to sharing with shown opportunities to address
opportunities to level to share lesson
share lesson others
lesson learners’ differences
address 2. Lesson
learners’ plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differences in strategies on differentiated and
developmentally appropriate
gender, needs,
opportunities to address
strengths, 7.5% learners’ differences
0 0.000
interests and 3.
Submitted at
experiences. Submitted at
Submitted at least 1
Submitted at
least 1 lesson, as
Corresponding instructional
least 1 lesson as least 1 lesson as materials showing differentiated
lesson as evidently evidenced by No acceptable
evidently shown evidently shown and developmentally appropriate
Efficiency shown in MOV 1 either MOV 2 or 3 evidence
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and opportunities to address
and supported by but no evidence shown
supported by any supported by any learners’ differences
any acceptable MOV of sharing with
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV 4. Others (e.g. testimonial,
others
write-up from colleagues of the
lessons/insights gained from the
Master Teacher's sharing)

Timeliness

1. Classroom observation tool

(COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Developed and Developed and observer agreement form about
Developed and
Developed and applied effective applied effective using effective strategies in
applied effective
applied effective strategies strategies implementing developmentally
strategies
strategies showing showing showing sequenced teaching and
showing
developmentall y- developmentall y- developmentall y- No acceptable learning process
developmentally -
7. Developed Quality
sequenced
sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced evidence was 2. Results of learners’
and learning teaching and teaching and show assessment during the actual
and applied teaching and
process as shown in learning process learning process teaching
effective learning process
MOV 1 with a rating as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
as shown in MOV 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
strategies in the of 7 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of used in demonstration teaching
1 with a rating of
planning and 6 5 highlighting developmentally
management of sequenced teaching-learning
process
developmentally
Curriculum 4. Instructional materials
sequenced showing effective strategies in
and Planning 7.5% 0 0.000
teaching and developmentally sequenced
(22.5%) teaching and learning process
learning
5. Performance tasks/test
processes to
material(s) used in
 management of sequenced teaching-learning
process
developmentally
Curriculum 4. Instructional materials
sequenced showing effective strategies in
and Planning 7.5% 0 0.000
teaching and developmentally sequenced
(22.5%) teaching and learning process
learning
Submitted 1 5. Performance tasks/test
processes to Submitted at Submitted 2-3
lesson as material(s) used in
meet curriculum least 4 lessons lessons as
evidenced by
Submitted 1 demonstration teaching
requirements as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 lesson as No acceptable 6. Others (Please specify
shown in MOV 1
Efficiency MOV 1 and 2 and and 2 and evidenced by any evidence was and provide annotations)
and varied supported by any supported by any 1
and/or 2 and
1 of the show
teaching supported by any
1 of the other of the other acceptable MOV
1 of the other
contexts. acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Curriculum 8. Reviewed
and Planning with colleagues, Consistently led Occasionally led Rarely led
(22.5%) teacher and Frequently led
collaborative collaborative collaborative
collaborative
learner feedback reviews of
reviews of teacher
reviews of reviews of
No acceptable
to plan, facilitate teacher and teacher and teacher and
Quality and learner evidence was
learner feedback learner feedback learner feedback
and enrich as evidenced by
feedback as
as evidenced by as evidenced by
show
teaching evidenced by the
the MOV the MOV the MOV
MOV submitted
practice. submitte submitted submitted

1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan

2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions
on use of teacher and learner
Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 feedback to enrich teaching
7.5% collaborative collaborative collaborative Submitted 1 practice with proof of
0 0.000
reviews of reviews of teacher reviews of collaborative attendance
teacher and and learner teacher and review of teacher 3. Others (Please specify
No acceptable
learner feedback feedback as learner feedback and learner
Efficiency evidence was and provide annotations)
as evidently evidently shown in as evidently feedback as
show
shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 evidently shown
and supported by supported by any 1 and supported by in any of the
any 1 of the of the acceptable any 1 of the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Basic
Education
Services
 1. Teaching and learning 0 0.000
resources developed by
colleagues and critiqued on their
alignment to learning goals
2.
Lesson plans by colleagues
Consistently Occasionally critiqued in terms of the
Basic Rarely advised alignment of the teaching and
advised Frequently advised advised
Education colleagues in the learning resources to the
colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
Services selection, indicated learning goals and
selection, selection, selection,
organization, appropriateness to the target
organization, organization, organization,
development and No acceptable learners
development and development and development and
Quality appropriate use evidence was 3. Others (Please
appropriate use appropriate use of appropriate use
of teaching and shown specify and provide annotations)
of teaching and teaching and of teaching and
learning
learning learning resources learning
9. Advised and resources as
resources as as shown in the resources as
shown in the
guided shown in the MOV submitted shown in the
MOV submitted
colleagues in MOV submitted MOV submitted
the selection,
organization,
development
and use of
7.5%
appropriate
teaching and
learning
resources, Submitted at Submitted 2
Submitted 3 Submitted 1
including ICT, to least 4 teaching
teaching and
teaching and
teaching and
address specific and learning learning No acceptable
learning resources learning resource
Efficiency resources as resources as evidence was
learning goals. evidenced by at
as evidenced by at
evidenced by at
as evidenced by
shown
least 1 of the any of the
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative
review if the test is designed
collaboratively
based on its purpose (e.g.
with colleagues diagnostic, formative and
to review the Consistently Occasionally summative)
Frequently reviewed Rarely reviewed
design, reviewed reviewed 2. Any proof of
collaboratively collaboratively
collaboratively collaboratively No acceptable collaborative review of the
selection, assessment tools assessment tools
Quality assessment tools assessment tools evidence was alignment of the test with the
organization and with colleagues ass with colleagues
with colleagues with colleagues show curriculum 2.1.
hown in the MOV as shown in the
use of a range as shown in the as shown in the formative test attached to a
submitted MOV submitted
of effective MOV submitted MOV submitted lesson plan
2.2. summative
diagnostic,
assessment with TOS
formative and 2.3.
summative 7.5% diagnostic test with its TOS 3. 0 0.000
assessment Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
strategies
Submitted at
consistent with Submitted 2 Submitted 1
least 4 Submitted 3
curriculum assessment tools assessment tools as
assessment tools assessment tool
No acceptable
as evidently as evidently
requirements. Efficiency as evidently evidently shown in evidence was
shown in any of shown in any of
shown in any of any of the shown
the acceptable the acceptable
the acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV
Assessment MOV
Basic
and
Education
Services Reporting
(22.5%) Timeliness

11. Interpreted 1.Collaborative interpretation of

the index of mastery obtained
collaboratively
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely from 1 class 2.
monitoring and collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with Collaborative interpretation of
evaluation colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the No acceptable item analysis of quarterly
strategies of Quality interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of evidence was examinations
assessment data assessment data as assessment data assessment data shown 3. Collaborative
attainment data
as shown in the shown in the MOV as shown in the as shown in the interpretation of results of
to support MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted. performance assessment
learner progress 4. Others
and (Please specify and provide
achievement. 7.5% annotations) 0 0.000
Submitted at
Submitted at Submitted at least 3 No acceptable
least 2 of the Submitted any 1
Efficiency least 2 different of the same kind of evidence was
same kind of of the MOV
types of MOV MOV shown
MOV

Timeliness
 Basic 12. Applied
Education
skills in the 1. Sample agreement for
Services Consistently Occasionally Rarely applied learners at risk signed by
effective applied skills in Frequently applied applied skills in skills in the parents and corresponding
communication the effective skills in the effective the effective effective evidence of improvement
of learner communication of communication of communication of communication of
No acceptable 2. Record of
needs, progress learner needs learner needs and learner needs learner needs dialogue and/or parentteacher
Quality evidence was
and progress to progress to parents/ and progress to and progress to conferences and corresponding
and parents/ guardians as shown parents/ parents/
shown
evidence of improvement
achievement to guardians as in the MOV guardians as guardians as 3. Anecdotal
key shown in the submitted shown in the shown in the record communicated to and
stakeholders, MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted signed by the learners and/or
including parents with corresponding
evidence of improvement
parents/guardia 4. Sample
ns. of learners’ test results signed
Submitted at No acceptable by parents and corresponding
Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1
Efficiency least 3 of the evidence was evidence of improvement
Assessment acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV
shown 5.
and Sample of accomplished rubrics
7.5% 0 0.000
Reporting given for performance task and
corresponding evidence of
(22.5%)
improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes
of parentteacher conference
7. Signed report cards of
students at risk with
corresponding evidence of
improvement
8. Correspondence
Timeliness notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other
modalities (e.g. e-mail, SMS,
etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement
9. Learners’ performance record

10. Others (Please specify

and provide annotations)

13. Performed 1. Served as reliever of classes

in the absence of teachers
various related
2.
works/activities Served as OIC in the absence of
that contribute the principal
to the teaching- Frequently Occasionally Occasionally 3. Represented the
Consistently
performed performed performed principal in meetings and
learning performed
various related various related various related conferences 4. Observed
process. . various related
work/activities work/activities work/activities No classes of Teachers I-III
work/activities
that contribute that contribute that contribute acceptable 5. Assisted
Quality that contribute to
to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching evidence the school selection committee
the teaching
learning learning learning was shown in the evaluation of credentials
learning process
process as process as process as when hiring or promoting
as shown in the
shown in the shown in the shown in the teachers
MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

6. Certificate
of Recognition or Participation
 6. Certificate
of Recognition or Participation
7.
Plus Factor Certificate of Training
10.0% 8. Certificate of Speakership
0 0.000
(10%) Submitted at No
Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 9. Committee involvement
least 4 different acceptable 10. Advisorship of Co-curricular
Efficiency different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable
kinds of evidence activities
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
acceptable MOV was shown

11. Book or Journal

Authorship/Coauthorship/Contrib
utorship
12.
Coordinatorship/chairmanship
Timeliness 13. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
14. Mentoring pre-
service/in-service teachers
15. Others (Please
specify and provide annotations)

OVER-ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 0.000

TOTAL 100%
ADJECTIVAL RATING

___________________
_________________________
Master Teacher II MARILYN E. PROSIA CRISTY C. EPE , CESE
Ratee Rater SDS
Approving Authority
Date Signed: Date Signed: _________________
_________________ Date Signed:
_________________
RS I-IV

D IN DURING EVALUATION

SCORE
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
0.000

0.000
0.000
 0.000

0.000

ISTY C. EPE , CESE

SDS
Approving Authority

Date Signed:
________________