Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 1 of 19

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)

October 6, 2019

VIA ELCTRONIC (ECF) FILING

United States District Court
Attn: Clerk’s Office
Suite 2300
1 Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210

RE: EMERGENCY NOTICE - HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-v-cv-11880

Dear Clerk of the Court:

Enclosed, please find the following EMERGENCY NOTICE for filing in the above-referenced
Docket. Since the Plaintiff is filing electronically via ECF, please deliver a hard copy to the direct
attention of the Chief Judge – the Honorable Patti B. Saris:

1. PLAINTIFF EMERGENCY NOTICE TO RE-ESTABLISH JURISDICTION AND

INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY

Please be advised, as indicated in the attached Notice, the follow-up letter directed to Chief Judge
Saris has also been delivered electronically to multiple parties including Clerks of this Court and
multiple government offices/agencies - due to: (1) recent developments involving ALL named
Defendants; (2) the severity of evidenced claims involving judicial officers of this Court and its
perceived threat to National Security; and (3) the continued imbalance of hardships that warrants
immediate corrective action. As a respectful reminder, the referenced Docket is still considered
OPEN, as the Dismissal (and all related) order(s) is considered VOID, as it was issued by a
disqualified judicial officer – Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs (RECUSED). The Court’s failure to
re-establish jurisdiction thus far has also caused an unnecessary delay and incremental hardships
to the Plaintiff – warranting the immediate attention of the Chief Judge. Thank you for your
attention to this very serious and sensitive matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff

1
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 2 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

)
MOHAN A HARIHAR, )
)
Plaintiff )
) Docket No. 15-cv-11880
v. )
)
US BANK et al, )
)
Defendants )
)

PLAINTIFF EMERGENCY NOTICE TO RE-ESTABLISH JURISDICTION AND

INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER
UNNECESSARY DELAY

The Plaintiff, Mohan A. Harihar, a pro se litigant with no legal experience, respectfully files this

EMERGENCY NOTICE, which includes a follow-up to the September 25, 2019 letter [Ref.

ECF No. 160] directed to Chief Judge – the Hon. Patti B. Saris.1 As a respectful reminder, the

referenced Docket is still considered OPEN, since the Dismissal (and all related) order(s) was

issued by a disqualified judicial officer – Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs (RECUSED) and is

considered VOID.2 The Court’s failure to re-establish jurisdiction thus far has caused an

unnecessary delay and incremental hardships to the Plaintiff – warranting the immediate

attention of the Chief Judge. This emergency notice also respectfully updates the Court on new

1
See Exhibit 1, to view the follow-up letter delivered via email to Chief Judge – Hon. Patti B. Saris on October
4, 2019, in its entirety.
2
See Exhibit 2, to view the sua sponte RECUSAL order issued by US District Court Judge – Hon. Allison Dale
Burroughs on June 19, 2017.
2
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 3 of 19

developments in the above-referenced civil complaint and the legal expectations moving

forward. Please be advised of the following:

I. The Defendant’s Timeline for Reaching a Mutual Agreement has Expired – as stated in

the 9/25/19 letter to Chief Judge Saris, the Plaintiff had in Good Faith, extended an

opportunity to reach a mutual agreement with ALL FOURTEEN (14) Defendants associated

with this Docket:

1. WELLS FARGO NA;

2. US BANK NA;
3. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS;
4. FORMER MASSACHUSETTS AG - MARTHA COAKLEY;
5. HARMON LAW OFFICES, PC;
6. NELSON MULLINS, LLP;
7. PETER HALEY, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
8. DAVID E. FIALKOW, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
9. JEFFREY S. PATTERSON, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
10. KURT R. MCHUGH, Esq. (Harmon Law Offices, PC);
11. KEN DAHER (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
12. Mary Daher (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
13. JEFFREY PERKINS; and
14. ISABELLE PERKINS

Previously, it was reported to the Court that Bank Defendants – WELLS FARGO and US

BANK had expressed an interest in having a mutual agreement discussion. Despite the

Defendants statement of record, they have failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a

settlement proposal. Therefore, the offer has expired and is off the table. Similarly,

Defendants – Jeffrey and Isabelle Perkins had expressed an interest in having a mutual

agreement discussion and have also failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a settlement

proposal.

3
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 4 of 19

The remaining Defendants have failed to respond all together. That includes the Defendant –

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where the Plaintiff’s numerous efforts to communicate

with: (1) representing counsel – Assistant AG Jesse M. Boodoo; (2) MA Attorney

General Maura Healey; (3) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); and (4) Massachusetts

Congressional Leaders including US Senator (and 2020 Presidential Candidate)

Elizabeth Warren have been blatantly ignored. Rather than work together to resolve these

serious legal issues, leaders of this Commonwealth (and all Defendants) appear intent on

aligning with disqualified judicial offers who have (as a matter of record) exemplified

patterns of corrupt conduct – including (but not limited to) evidenced acts of TREASON

against The United States of America. The most recent judicial failures evidenced on this

docket - by RECUSED US District Court Judge – the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs,

were previously brought to the attention of this Court and specifically to the attention of the

Chief Judge in the referenced letter, delivered September 25, 2019. Therefore, the Plaintiff

respectfully requests that the Chief Judge first assist with restoring jurisdiction over this

docket before proceeding any further.

II. The Plaintiff will Next Seek to Amend his Original Complaint – Once jurisdiction has

been restored (and after this Court has VOIDED all judgements issued by disqualified

judicial officers), the Plaintiff intends to amend his original complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 60(b)(2) & (3). It should appear clear to this Court (and to any objective observer)

that ALL Defendants – including: (1) the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (2) ALL

representing counsel of record; and (3) their respective law firms appear intent on aligning

with the VOID decisions of DISQUALIFIED judicial officers who have (as a matter of

record) evidenced acts of Treason against The United States.

4
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 5 of 19

The Plaintiff’s referenced amendment will include adding the following parties as Defendants to

this Docket:

1. K&L Gates, LLP;

2. Rich May, PC;
3. Casner & Edwards, LLP;
4. Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq. (Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
5. Kevin Patrick Polansky, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
6. Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq. (Rich May, PC); and
7. Matthew Murphy, Esq. (Casner & Edwards, LLP)

It also should appear clear to ANY objective observer who has thoroughly researched the

historical record – that collectively, these parties are in “LOCK-STEP” to successfully commit

Fraud Upon this Court. The overall INTENT to consciously commit this Fraud is (at

minimum) believed to be twofold:

A. To Prevent Legal Precedent from being Set – as it pertains to the illegal securitization

of mortgages and other crimes identified with the 2008 US Foreclosure Crisis; and

B. To Irreparably Damage the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret – known as

“THE HARIHAR FCS MODEL©” which was designed to assist The United States with

Economic growth and recovery from damages resulting from the 2008 Foreclosure/

Financial Crisis - and is ultimately protected under the Economic Espionage Act.

The Plaintiff respectfully re-states that Sovereign/Judicial Immunity, as well as Litigation

Privilege is considered WAIVED, when Fraud Upon the Court has been evidenced.

III. Upholding Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) – Once jurisdiction has been restored, if the named

Defendants (including parties still to be added as Defendants) do not wish to enter into a

mutual agreement with the Plaintiff – and instead insist on maintaining their current position,

5
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 6 of 19

this Court must ultimately uphold the Plaintiff’s evidenced (and UNOPPOSED) Fraud on

the Court claims(s); bringing a Default judgement in favor of the Plaintiff with prejudice.

The related Criminal and Professional complaints of record – against all parties will also

need to be addressed by: (1) this Court; (2) the Department of Justice (DOJ); (3) the Board of

BAR Overseers/BAR Council; and (4) the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

IV. Assistance with the Appointment of Counsel, 28 U.S.C § 1915- The Plaintiff respectfully

reminds this Court that he is a Pro Se litigant with NO LEGAL EXPERIENCE. While the

historical record shows a TEXTBOOK reason for this Court to exercise its discretion and

assist the Plaintiff with the appointment of counsel, it MAY be considered moot once Federal

Rule 60 is upheld.

V. Re-establishing a Balance of Hardships – As a matter of record, the Plaintiff has long

evidenced the imbalance of hardships that has existed since the beginning of this litigation in

MA State Courts over EIGHT (8) years ago. The Plaintiff’s indigency caused by the

identified illegal foreclosure3 has been acknowledged by every MA State and Federal Court,

including the Supreme Court of The United States. This Court’s failure to re-establish

balance has caused further damage and increased hardship to the Plaintiff. The most pressing

issues warranting immediate attention include (but are not limited to) the following:

A. Housing – The Plaintiff, who went HOMELESS for nearly two (2) years after his

illegal foreclosure, has been in a 40b Affordable Housing scenario as his only

available source of housing. The existing lease is set to expire this month on

October 31, 2019 – and there is no guarantee of renewal. The Plaintiff therefore,

3
As a matter of record, the Plaintiff’s foreclosed Property - located at 168 Parkview Avenue, Lowell, MA 01852,
was identified as an ILLEGAL Foreclosure by: (1) The Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) The Massachusetts
Office of the Attorney General (MA AGO); and (3) Federal Bank Regulators.
6
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 7 of 19

seeks corrective action to temporarily re-establish housing conditions while legal

actions are ongoing, as they existed prior to the identified illegal foreclosure; and so

that increased hardships pertaining to housing can be avoided.

B. Pending IRS and MA DOR Sanctions – The Plaintiff has recently received

communications from both the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Massachusetts

Department of Revenue (MA DOR), threatening to levy sanctions against him for

unpaid taxes which remain due. While the Plaintiff does not contest the taxes due to

the state and federal government, the financial hardship caused by the referenced

illegal foreclosure and the judicial failures that have followed (at minimum) warrant

an injunction that freezes any potential sanctions or collection action against the

Plaintiff until ALL legal issues have been justly resolved.

C. Transportation –Aside from the severe financial hardship, the identified illegal

foreclosure has caused severe damage to the Plaintiff’s credit, making it impossible to

afford reliable transportation on his own. The Plaintiff has since had to burden family

members in order to meet daily transportation needs. The Plaintiff seeks to

temporarily re-establish balance as it pertains to daily transportation as it existed prior

to the illegal foreclosure until all legal issues have been resolved.

In each of the above-referenced hardships, the record shows that the Plaintiff’s

evidenced arguments clearly satisfy the four-factor test, including success on the

merits.

7
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 8 of 19

VI. The Plaintiff Fears for his Personal Safety and Security after being Threatened by a

Disqualified Judicial Officer – The Plaintiff references RECUSED US District Court

Judge – the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs, who’s 8/5/19 VOID order was issued without

jurisdiction.4 A review of the void order shows that Judge Burroughs clearly threatens to

bring sanctions against Plaintiff – Mohan A. Harihar, should he continue to report

judicial misconduct including evidenced acts of TREASON against The United States of

America.

Upon filing this Emergency Notice, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court and Chief

Judge Saris timely address and initiate corrective action as it pertains to the legal issues

referenced within – beginning with jurisdiction, no later than this coming Friday, October 11,

2019.

Certification and Closing

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify to the best of my knowledge,

information, and belief that this Notice: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as

to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; (2) is supported by

existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law; (3)

the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have

evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the

Motion otherwise complies with the requirements of Rule 11.

4
See Exhibit 3 [ECF No. 159]
8
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 9 of 19

Please be advised, the referenced litigation is related to a new complaint now being prepared for

filing in The United States Court of Federal Claims; and includes matters perceived to impact

National Security. Therefore, the following government offices/agencies/committees will

necessarily receive copies of this formal letter (via email, US Mail and/or social media):

1. President Donald J. Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov);

2. US Secret Service;
3. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS);
4. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
5. Office of the US Inspector General (OIG) - specifically, IG Michael Horowitz;
6. Department of Justice (DOJ) - specifically, US Attorney General, William Barr;
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
8. Administrative Office of US Courts - specifically, Director James C. Duff;
9. House/Senate Judiciary Committees;
10. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
11. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
12. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA);
13. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA);
14. US Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-MA);

Copies of this Emergency Notice will separately be made available to the Public and to media

outlets nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for the

Plaintiff’s personal safety and security. If the Court has ANY questions regarding any portion

of this Emergency Notice, or requires additional information, the Plaintiff is happy to provide

upon request. The Plaintiff is grateful for the Court’s consideration of this very serious, and

sensitive matter.

Respectfully submitted this 6th Day of October, 2019

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

9
Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 10 of 19

Exhibit 1

10
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 11 of 19

Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>

A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B.

SARIS
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 1:41 PM
To: marie_losco@mad.uscourts.gov, maryellen_molloy@mad.uscourts.gov,
miguel_lara@mad.uscourts.gov
Cc: dan_jackson@ao.uscourts.gov, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us"
<constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>, elizabeth warren <elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>,
sydney levin-epstein <sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov>, lori trahan
<lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, ayanna pressley <ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, NewYorkComplaints
Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew
lelling <andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, maura.healey@state.ma.us, chairmanoffice@sec.gov,
CommissionerStein@sec.gov, CommissionerJackson@sec.gov, CommissionerPeirce@sec.gov,
jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>, "Jeffrey B. Loeb"
<JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, Kevin Polansky <kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com>,
kmchugh@harmonlaw.com, "Murphy, Matthew T." <mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, Nora Keefe
<Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>, Nairoby Gabriel <Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>

FOLLOW-UP LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE –

THE HONORABLE PATTI B. SARIS

October 4, 2019

The Honorable Patti B. Saris

Chief Judge – District of Massachusetts
John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse
1 Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210
Phone: (617) 748-9175

RE: HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880

Dear Chief Judge Saris:

This follow-up communication to the Plaintiff’s September 25, 2019 letter [Ref. ECF No. 160]
is respectfully delivered to your Honor’s direct attention to update the Court on recent
developments in the above-referenced civil complaint. Please be advised of the following:

11
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 12 of 19

I. The Defendant’s Timeline for Reaching a Mutual Agreement has Expired – as stated in
the 9/25/19 letter to your Honor, the Plaintiff had in Good Faith, extended an opportunity to
reach a mutual agreement with ALL FOURTEEN (14) Defendants associated with the
referenced Docket:
1. WELLS FARGO NA;
2. US BANK NA;
3. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS;
4. FORMER MASSACHUSETTS AG - MARTHA COAKLEY;
5. HARMON LAW OFFICES, PC;
6. NELSON MULLINS, LLP;
7. PETER HALEY, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
8. DAVID E. FIALKOW, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
9. JEFFREY S. PATTERSON, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
10. KURT R. MCHUGH, Esq. (Harmon Law Offices, PC);
11. KEN DAHER (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
12. Mary Daher (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
13. JEFFREY PERKINS; and
14. ISABELLE PERKINS

Previously, it was reported to your Honor that Bank Defendants – WELLS FARGO and
US BANK had expressed an interest in having a mutual agreement discussion. Despite the
Defendants statement of record, they have failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a
settlement proposal. Therefore, the offer has expired and is off the table. Similarly,
Defendants – Jeffrey and Isabelle Perkins had expressed an interest in having a mutual
agreement discussion and have also failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a settlement
proposal.

The remaining Defendants have failed to respond all together. That includes the Defendant –
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where the Plaintiff’s numerous efforts to communicate
with: (1) representing counsel – Assistant AG Jesse M. Boodoo; (2) MA Attorney
General Maura Healey; (3) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); and (4) Massachusetts
Congressional Leaders including US Senator (and 2020 Presidential Candidate)
Elizabeth Warren have been blatantly ignored. Rather than work together to resolve these
serious legal issues, leaders of this Commonwealth (and all Defendants) appear intent on
aligning with disqualified judicial offers who have (as a matter of record) exemplified
12
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 13 of 19

patterns of corrupt conduct – including (but not limited to) evidenced acts of TREASON
against The United States of America. The most recent judicial failures evidenced on this
docket - by RECUSED US District Court Judge – the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs,
were previously brought to your Honor’s attention in the referenced letter, delivered
September 25, 2019.5 Therefore, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that your Honor first
assist with restoring jurisdiction over this docket.
II. The Plaintiff will Next Seek to Amend his Original Complaint – Once jurisdiction has
been restored (and after this Court has VOIDED all judgements issued by disqualified
judicial officers), the Plaintiff intends to amend his original complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b)(2) & (3). It should appear clear to this Court (and to any objective observer)
that ALL Defendants – including: (1) the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (2) ALL
representing counsel of record; and (3) their respective law firms appear intent on aligning
with the VOID decisions of DISQUALIFIED judicial officers who have (as a matter of
record) evidenced acts of Treason against The United States.

Additional amendments will include adding the following Defendants:

1. K&L Gates, LLP;
2. Rich May, PC;
3. Casner & Edwards, LLP;
4. Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq. (Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
5. Kevin Patrick Polansky, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
6. Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq. (Rich May, PC); and
7. Matthew Murphy, Esq. (Casner & Edwards, LLP)

It also should appear clear to ANY objective observer who has thoroughly researched the
historical record – that collectively, these parties are clearly in “LOCK-STEP” to successfully
commit Fraud Upon this Court. The overall INTENT to consciously commit this Fraud is (at
minimum) believed to be twofold:

5
Following her sua sponte recusal on June 19, 2017, US District Court Judge – Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs issued
an order on July 29, 2019 WITHOUT JURISDICTION, denying the Plaintiff’s Motion [Ref. ECF No. 157]. On
August 5, 2019, a second VOID order was issued without jurisdiction [Ref. ECF No. 158]. Both of these actions
are interpreted as clear (and incremental) violations to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 - JUDICIAL
TREASON.

13
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 14 of 19

C. To Prevent Legal Precedent from being Set – as it pertains to the illegal securitization
of mortgages and other crimes identified with the 2008 US Foreclosure Crisis; and
D. To Irreparably Damage the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret – known
as “THE HARIHAR FCS MODEL©” which was designed to assist The United States
with Economic growth and recovery from damages resulting from the 2008 Foreclosure/
Financial Crisis - and is ultimately protected under the Economic Espionage Act.

The Plaintiff respectfully re-states that Sovereign/Judicial Immunity, as well as Litigation

Privilege is considered WAIVED, when Fraud Upon the Court has been evidenced.

III. Upholding Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) – Once jurisdiction has been restored, if the named
Defendants (including parties still to be added as Defendants) do not wish to enter into a
mutual agreement with the Plaintiff – and instead insist on maintaining their current position,
this Court must ultimately uphold the Plaintiff’s evidenced (and UNOPPOSED) Fraud on
the Court claims(s); bringing a Default judgement in favor of the Plaintiff with prejudice.
The related Criminal and Professional complaints of record – against all parties will also
need to be addressed by: (1) this Court; (2) the Department of Justice (DOJ); (3) the Board of
BAR Overseers/BAR Council; and (4) the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
IV. Assistance with the Appointment of Counsel, 28 U.S.C § 1915- The Plaintiff respectfully
reminds your Honor that he is a Pro Se litigant with NO LEGAL EXPERIENCE. While the
historical record shows a TEXTBOOK reason for this Court to exercise its discretion and
assist the Plaintiff with the appointment of counsel, it MAY be considered moot once Federal
Rule 60 is upheld.
Please be advised, the referenced litigation is related to a new complaint now being prepared

for filing in The United States Court of Federal Claims; and includes matters perceived to

impact National Security. Therefore, the following government offices/agencies/committees will

necessarily receive copies of this formal letter (via email, US Mail and/or social media):

1. President Donald J. Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov);

2. US Secret Service;
3. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS);
4. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);

14
 Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 15 of 19

5. Office of the US Inspector General (OIG) - specifically, IG Michael Horowitz;

6. Department of Justice (DOJ) - specifically, US Attorney General, William Barr;
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
8. Administrative Office of US Courts - specifically, Director James C. Duff;
9. House/Senate Judiciary Committees;
10. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
11. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
12. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA);
13. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA);
14. US Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-MA);

Copies of this Letter will separately: (1) be included in a NOTICE filed with the Court; (2) be

delivered via email communication to the Court Clerk(s); and (3) will also be made available to

the Public and to media outlets nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued

concerns for the Plaintiff’s personal safety and security. If your Honor has ANY questions

regarding any portion of this letter, or requires additional information, the Plaintiff is happy to

provide upon request. The Plaintiff is grateful for your Honor’s consideration of this very serious,

and sensitive matter.

Respectfully submitted this 4th Day of October, 2019

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

15
Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 16 of 19

Exhibit 2

16
Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 17 of 19

17
Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 18 of 19

Exhibit 3

18
Case 1:15-cv-11880-ADB Document 161 Filed 10/06/19 Page 19 of 19

19