Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
IN JAMMU”
PROJECT REPORT
(AKTU)
(2018-2020)
Submitted by
CERTIFICATE
PEPSI V/s COCA COLAIN JAMMU” is a bonafide record of the work done by
DECLARATION
PEPSI V/s COCA COLAIN JAMMU” submitted to the ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL
UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of
MASTERS OF BUSINESSMANAGEMENT is a record of original research work done by us
during the period of 2011-2013 under the supervision and guidance of MIS. NEHAL JAIN
,Lecturer in Department of Business Management Studies,SAHARANPUR
Date :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PEPSI V/s COCA COLAIN JAMMU” I am grateful to (HOD) for providing me this
opportunity.
keen interest, encouragement and constructive support and under whose able
guidance I have completed out my project. She not only helped me in my project
but also gave me an overall exposure to other issues related to retailing and
I take the pleasure to express thanks to all my colleagues for many useful
Table of CONTENTS
Introduction 1-9
2
Review literature 10-16
3 17-19
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
18
RESEARCH DESIGN
SAMPLING PLAN 18
DATA COLLECTION 18
POPULATION
18
SAMPLING UNIT
19
SAMPLING FRAME
19
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
19
SAMPLING SIZE
19
Suggestion 37
6 Webliography 38-39
Bibliography
7 Questionnaire 40-45
Lists of Tables
Chapter - 1
INTRODUCTION
SWOT ANALYSIS
OBJECTIVES
The project highlighted that the companies that will prosper will be those that have prepared for
future challenges - like water scarcity, climate change and obesity – and, critically, those that are
actively helping to overcome these challenges now.
One outcome of the Scenarios and Strategy work is that PepsiCo is building a team to focus on
sustainable agriculture, so it can mitigate the risks that climate and water crises pose to its supply
chains, now and in the future. The project work has also contributed to the development of new
strategies for the business on the environment and health and wellness.
Indra Nooyi, Chairman and CEO, PepsiCo said:
“PepsiCo's commitment to sustainability is about an idea of the company which focuses on
the long-term, as our Scenarios 2030 project has shown us. We cannot contribute properly
to finding an end to the climate crisis until we bring environmental and social governance
into our long-term business strategies/decisions. It’s not all about the risks, but also about
the opportunities.”
The scenarios were developed specially for PepsiCo and were based on extensive desk research,
a series of workshops and over 100 interviews on possible future environment and health trends.
The interviewees ranged from senior executives at PepsiCo, including Chairman and CEO Indra
Nooyi, to external experts like Gro Harlem Brundtland, the former Prime Minister of Norway
and ex-Director General of the World Health Organisation. We also held a number of
implications workshops in the US, India, China, Latin America and Europe.
This work is seen as a critical piece of strategic thinking for the business. Robert Schasel,
Director of Energy & Resource Conservation at PepsiCo, who commissioned the work said: “I
can't express strongly enough my sincere appreciation and gratitude for the work that the Forum
team has done on this project. The incredible amount that we have achieved in such a short time
is truly amazing. The workshops were all very professionally run and highly engaging.
We've created a snowball within the organisation and we've reached globally like no other
project I've seen. I am absolutely overjoyed at the results we've achieved to date, and I'm very
much looking forward to the next steps.”
Derek Yach, Senior Vice President, Global Health Policy, PepsiCo said:
“Issues like climate change, hunger and obesity and changing agricultural supply chains all
have a strategic impact on our business. The Scenarios and Strategy 2030, with Forum For
The Future was a professional and inspiring process that enable us to identify risks and
opportunities that will impact the core business today and in the future. As a result
PepsiCo will be better prepared and stronger as a company.”
Dan Bena, Senior Director, Sustainable Development PepsiCo, said:
“I could not be more thrilled with our experience with Forum. It was the first time at
PepsiCo that we have taken such a formalized and rigorous long-term view of our business
risks and opportunities.
Forum helped us see what we knew in our heart...that the magnitude of the global crises we
face cannot be solved in the short-term. Similarly, companies that will be successful in 20
years are those who recognize and respect the long term trends, and who are nimble
enough to address them.
The design and activation of Forum's process is, in a word, comprehensive. They leave no
stone unturned during their expert interviews, desk research, and field validation. We now
think strategically, LONG term, thanks to Forum.”
E-mail:jbpl@nde.vsnl.net.in
Website: www.jaibeverages.com
The year was 1999 and Pepsi Company in India was very eager to improve its extremely poor market
share(less than 3% in the state of Jammu and Kashmir).
That was when it approached the soft drink maestros of India- the Jaipuria family, C.K Jaipuria in
particulars, for starting a plant in J&K in spite of all the odds, the non-inductive climate in the state for a
new business venture, he took a bold step and went ahead with accepting the challenge and taking the
franchise in the name of his elder son-Mr. Anurag Jaipuria, and Jai Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Was born. From
the day of the decision to this day in 2007, there has been no looking back. In this short span of time, the
company has been formed, sprawling compound of erstwhile M/S HINUSTAN LEVERS LTD. Taken
over from a supportive SIDCO, a prestigious unit in J&K, after an initial investment of Rs. 27.1 crores,
has been established with full backing of the ministry of Industries (J&K govt.) and an ultra-modern plant
which releases all the effluent water after full treatment at a very reasonable, and much under the
pollution boards max acceptable BOD and COD levels. In fact, work is on to stop all the treated effluent
going out and instead to utilize this water internally for horticulture. In the other words, the water is being
put back in to the earth to retain the water table. Further, work has been done to grow more trees within
the premises, in the line with the universal endeavor of making the earth green. With coming of this
prestigious plant, there has been an upsurge in the economy of the people of the area in particular, and the
state in general. The direct, and indirect employment generated by the unit has already surpassed a figure
of 650 and is growing steadily. The excise deposited to the govt. exchequer has already crossed an
amount of Rs. 361 lakhs, and is again growing. The once semi deserted main road of the industrial
Complex has become very busy and would soon be required to be widened. In short, coming of the Jai
beverages pvt. Ltd. Into the state of J&K and surely made a big mark into the industrialization of the state
with many big industrial houses watching eagerly the outcome of this prestigious unit.
Jai beverages pvt. Ltd. is a part of diversified Jaipuria group being the major franchise of the Pepsi in
India. The group has 22 Pepsi’s bottling plant in India and Nepal. The new beverages plant having state of
art machinery from Krones, KHS, O&H, Gaulin & Magplast among the international industrial giants and
Hildon, Tula IDMS etc. among the Indian manufacturers. The fully automatic plant is being run by team
of professionals who have already made a mark for themselves by creating history in the international
Pepsi system by achieving the gold medal in the first year of operations from over 400 plants worldwide.
D) COMPANY’S VISION
“To be the best consumer products company in the eyes of our suppliers, customers,
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths
Weaknesses
b. A huge lobby against soft drink industry led by leaders like Baba Ramdev will
hurt as these leaders have a huge fan following in the country.
Opportunities
Threats
Objectives
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW LITERATURE
The purpose of this paper is the study of factors responsible for brand preference in
fmcg products, increasing competition, more due to globalization, is motivating
many companies to base their strategies almost entirely on building brands. Brand
preference means to compare the different brands and opt for the most preferred
brand. This brand preference is influenced by various factors .According to this study many
factors were find out for preferring a brand like Brand persona Brand constancy Brand loftiness
Brand value .In the identification of factors affecting the brand preference, it was concluded that
brand persona is the most effective factor that affects the brand preference. This brand persona
deals with the personality aspects or the external attributes of brand, thus it can be
said that consumer prefer any brand by looking at the external attributes of a brand.
colors now make up 31 per cent of the colourings market, compared with 40 per
cent for synthetics, according to LFI.
By choosing to formulate a new beverage, the researchers noted that the new
product would need to be differentiated by improving the sensory characteristics .F o u r
factors were identified for the formulation: four colour
i n t e n s i t i e s ) , t h r e e f l a v o r i n g s , t w o l a b e l t yp e s ( s o f t v e r s u s h a r d ) , a n d
t w o p a c k s i z e s ( s t a n d a r d v e r s u s oversize). By using both quantitative (hedonic
testing) and qualitative (focus groups) a p p r o a c h e s , t h e r e s e a r c h e r s f o u n d
t h a t “ t h e m a i n f a c t o r s w h i c h d r i v e c o n s u m e r preference for this concept are
colour intensity and flavoring”. Indeed, colour intensity accounted for 43 per cent and flavour 32
per cent of the consumers’ overall liking. “Pack s i z e a n d l a b e l t yp e a r e t a k e n i n t o
a c c o u n t b y t h e c o n s u m e r t o a l e s s e r e x t e n t , ” t h e y added. “This methodology of a
qualitative screening associated to a conjoint analysis on relevant sensory attributes has shown
good performances to fit consumers’ expectation: it has now to be reproduced, as every
brand, concept and product is a unique combination designed for a specific consumer
group,” concluded the researchers
Source: Food Quality and Preference Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 719-726By Stephen Daniels,
07-Oct-2008
S o u r c e - B e v e r l y J . Te p p e r a n d A my C . Tr a i l J o u r n a l o f F o o d
S c i e n c e a n d Technology, 15 September 1998
.
ABSTRACT Preference tests were performed for varieties of cola drinks, orange juices and
using three response protocols: the traditional paired preference test with the "no preference"
option, a 9-point hedonic scale and a 6-point hybrid hedonic/purchase intent scale. The different
stimuli to be assessed were presented in pairs, but putatively identical stimuli were
also presented as a "placebo" pair. Performance on the placebo pair with identical
stimuli p r o v i d e d a m e a s u r e o f t h e h i d d e n d e m a n d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e t e s t
p r o t o c o l . T h e presentation of the different pairs provided a measure of preference
accompanied by such h i d d e n d e m a n d e f f e c t s . C o m p a r i s o n b e t w e e n t h e t w o
a l l o w e d a b e t t e r m e a s u r e o f preference per se. The order of presentation of the identical
and different pairs did show occasional slight evidence of contrast effects. For the placebo
"identical" pairs, a majority of consumers reported false preferences. Liking questions
with the hedonic and hybrid s c a l e s e l i c i t e d f e w e r f a l s e p r e f e r e n c e s t h a n
p r e f e r e n c e q u e s t i o n s w i t h t h e p a i r e d preference protocol. Yet, the effects
tended to be slight. The 6-point hedonic/purchase intent scale exhibited the fewest false
preferences in the placebo condition, and this was because of its fewer categories rather
than any cognitive strategy change elicited by its different labels.
Source-Davis Woman’s Journal of Food Science and Technology, July 31, 2007
9. Good Points
Tasty
Bad Points
Bad for you ... but don't worry, it won't kill you, so don't try to make it so
Expensive at around a whopping 55p (and rising)
General Comments
In my very important opinion (yeah), it is a little better than Coke, simply because it doesn't have
the same nasty after taste.
People often compare Pepsi and Coke, but I think that this is unfair, as they are in fact quite
different from each other - the main difference being in taste - Pepsi is fresher and not as strong
as Coke.
I would definitely recommend Pepsi over Coke.
The only problem is that I think that it has even more sugar in it than Coke, despite it not tasting
as sweet.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH DESIGN
• SAMPLING PLAN
• DATA COLLECTION
• POPULATION
• SAMPLING UNIT
• SAMPLING FRAME
• SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
• SAMPLING SIZE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes the research methodology adopted to achieve the objectives of the study.
It includes the scope of the study, research design and collection of data and analysis of data.
Research design
A research design is an arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a manner
that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure. It constitutes
the blueprint for collection, measurement and analysis of data.
The research design for my research is exploratory and descriptive, as I will be exploring about
“Retailers perception on soft drinks- A Comparative
Data collection
For my research study the data has been collected by both the primary and secondary means. For
primary collection I adopted the structured questionnaire, which was filled by 100 respondents.
The secondary data of my research has been collected through newspapers, some web sites
,journals and some previous researches.
Population
Sampling unit
Retalier
Sampling frame
A sampling design is a definite plan for obtaining a sample from a given population. It refers to
the technique or the procedure the researcher would adopt in selecting items for the sample.
.
Sampling technique
Sampling size
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
1year-3years 11
4year-6year 19
7year-9year 27
10year and above 43
Table 5.1
Figure 5.1
Analysis: From the above table and pie chart, 43 retailers are in this business from 10 years-
above and 27 retailers are from 7 years-9 years
Interpretation: There are many retailers working with soft drinks companies in Jammu but most
of the retailers are working from a long time in this particular business.
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Coca-Cola and Pepsi both 65
Pepsi 19
Coca-Cola 16
Any other 0
Table no 5.2
Figure 5..2
Analysis: From the above table and pie chart, there are 65 retailers are working with both Pepsi
and Coca-Cola Company, 19 with Pepsi and 16 with Coca-Cola.
Interpretation: most of the retailers are working with both of the companies and both Pepsi and
Coca-Cola have some monopoly outlets in Jammu city.
Q5.3. What are your sales in terms of bottle per day in your shop?
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Total no. of bottles 34
Pepsi bottles 14
Coca-Cola bottles 20
Figure 5.3
Analysis: From the above table and bar chart, there are 34bottles sold every day both of Pepsi
and Coca-Cola Company, 14 with Pepsi and 20 with Coca-Cola.
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Daily 70
Alternative days 14
Weekly 0
Table no 5.4
Analysis:It is found from table 6.6(A) that 70 retailers have daily supply and 14 have on
alternative days but most of the retailers of jammu required the daily service of soft drink.
Interpretation: most of the retailers of Pepsi need daily supply. So it is concluded that the most
of the retailers require the daily service from Pepsi company that indicates the high sales of the
soft drinks.
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Daily 60
Alternative days 21
Weekly 0
Table no 5.4
Figure no. 5.4
Analysis:It is found from table 6.6(A) that 60 retailers have daily supply and 21have on
alternative daysbut most of the retailers of Jammu required the daily service of soft drink.
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Pepsi Cash 60
Pepsi Credit 24
Coke Cash 59
Coke Credit 22
Table no 5.5
Figure 5.5
Analysis: From the above table and graph, 60 retailers of Pepsi gives cash payment and 24
retailers have credit facility. The company distributor supplies the product to the retailer and they
will return after some time and collecting the money for those products. They are giving more
time to the retailers to give the payment for the drinks but Coca Cola company are not giving this
kind of facility to their retailers.
Table no 5.6
Figure no 5.6
Analysis: From the above table and graph, satisfaction level of retailers regarding supply of
Pepsi is 0.8
Interpretation: Most of the retailers are satisfy with the supply of Pepsi .
Table no 5.7
Figure no 5.7
Analysis: From the above table and graph, satisfaction level of retailers regarding supply of coke
is 0.75
Interpretation: Most of the retailers are satisfy with the supply of Coke but as compare to Pepsi
its less.
ATTRIBUTES RETAILERS
Pepsi 43
Coke 52
Table no 5.8
Figure no 5.8
Analysis: From the above table and graph that most of the retailers agreed with the Coke when
compared to Pepsi. On an average most of the retailers i.e. 52 voted for Coke Company for its
trade schemes offered to the retailers and the remaining 43 retailer are voted for Pepsi Company
for its trade schemes offered to the retailers.
Interpretation: So it is concluded that Coke Company dominated Pepsi in Jammu city in terms
of trade schemes offered to the retailers
Table no 5.9
Figure no 5.9
Analysis: From the above table and graph that most of the retailers agreed with the Coke
Company for its consumer promotions offered to the consumers. On an average most of the
retailers i.e. 53 voted for Coke Company for its consumer promotion and the remaining 47
retailer are voted for Pepsi Company for its consumer promotions offered to the consumers.
Interpretation: So it is concluded that Coke Company has better consumer promotions instead
of Pepsi in Jammu city.
Table no 5.10
Figure no 5.10
Analysis: From the above table and graph, on an average most of the retailers are saying that
T.V Ads will help in the increase in the sales of the Pepsi.
Interpretation: So it is concluded that there will be influence of the T.V. Ads on the increase of
the sales of the Pepsi Company a lot.
Table no 5.11
Figure no 5.11
Analysis: From the above table and graph, on an average most of the retailers are saying that
T.V Ads will help in the increase in the sales of the Pepsi.
Interpretation: So it is concluded that there will be same influence of the T.V. Ads on the
increase of the sales of the Coke Company .
Table no 5.12
Figure no 5.12
Analysis: From the above table and graph, satisfaction level of retailers regarding maintenance
of Pepsi Visi cooler is -0.023(Mean score).
Interpretation: So it is concluded that retailers of Pepsi are dissatisfy with the maintenance
service of Pepsi Visi cooler.
Table no 5.13
Figure no 5.13
Analysis: From the above table and graph, satisfaction level of retailers regarding maintenance
of Coke Visi cooler is -0.007(Mean score).
Interpretation: So it is concluded that retailers of Coke are dissatisfy with the maintenance
service of Coke Visi cooler. So in the end both Pepsi and Coke retailers are dissatisfied with the
maintenance of Visi cooler.
Chapter 6
1. Coke company dominated Pepsi Company in terms of availability of its brands in Jammu.
2. Most of the retailers of Pepsi require the daily supply, which indicates the high sales of the
soft drinks.
3. Most of the retailers are satisfied with the service of Pepsi Company as compare to coke.
4. Pepsi distribution is poor as compared to coke distribution channel and mainly all the Pepsi
brands are not available in retailers shop.
5. The service of Coke Company is good when compared to Pepsi Company, so here Coke
dominated Pepsi Company in terms of service to the retailers.
6. Coke Company dominates Pepsi Company in Jammu in terms of trade schemes offered to the
retailers.
7. Coke Company dominates Pepsi in Jammu in terms of consumer promotional offers offered to
the consumers.
8. There is influence of the T.V Ads on the increase in sales of the soft drinks a lot.
9. Pepsi Company is not providing the sufficient Pepsi Visi coolers to the retailer and compared
to coke company there are more Coke Visi cooler in Jammu.
10. Pepsi Company providing credit facility to the retailers not good as compare to market
availability.
11. Retailers are totally not satisfied with the maintenance of Pepsi Visi cooler.
Suggestions
1. Pepsi company has to supply their entire product sufficiently and regularly on time to the
retailers in Jammu.
3. As most of the retailers require daily supply, The company has to supply the drinks daily to
the retailers, so that they can serve the consumers according to their requirements. If they don’t
supply the drinks daily and sufficiently the sales will be decreased.
5. The trade schemes offered by Pepsi Company to the retailers should be increased and also
profitable to the retailers. If they are satisfied with the offers then they will promote the drinks
more and the profit will be more to the company.
6. Pepsi Company should introduce the new and attractive consumer promotional offer. Then the
consumers will be attracted towards Pepsi brand. Then the profit of the company will be
increased.
7. As the TV ads are influencing the soft drinks sales , the company should design the new ads in
an attractive way .
8. Pepsi Visi coolers are supplied very less to the retailers when compared to coke. The company
has to supply more Visi cooler to the retailers to increase their business. The company has to
check the condition of the Visi coolers regularly and if any problems are there then they have to
rectify those problems.
9. The soft drink companies are not providing the credits. There is a problem to the retailers
because they have to invest the amount before the sales of the soft drinks. This may be the
problem for some retailers with low investment. So it is better to provide the credit system to the
retailers.
10. Pepsi company has to take care of Visi coolers as retailers are not happy with the
maintenance of Visi cooler.
CHAPTER 7
BIBLOGRAPHY
Bibliography
BOOKS
Webliography
QUESTIONNAIRE
ADDRESS_______________________________________________
PHONE__________________________________________________
Q1. From how long haveyou been dealing in some or all of following drinks( pepsi , coke,) ?
(A)1year-3year
(B) 4year-6years
(C) 7year-9years
(D) 10year-12years
Q2. What are the various companies of soft drink you are dealing?
Coca-Cola and Pepsi both (If yes then move to Q3 & Q4)
Coca-Cola (If yes move to Q4)
Q3. What are your sales in terms of bottle per day in your shop?
For Pepsi
Daily
Alternate days
Weekly 2 times
For Coke
Daily
Alternate days
Weekly 2 times
Pepsi Cash
Pepsi credit
Coke Cash
Coke Credit
Highly Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Pepsi
Coke
Rani Juice
Pepsi
Coke
Rani Juice
Q10. What is the influence of T.V Ads on sales of Pepsi in your shop?
Highly Decreased
Decreased
Neutral
Increased
Highly Increased
Q11. What is the influence of T.V Ads on sales of Coke in your shop?
Highly Decreased
Decreased
Neutral
Increased
Highly Increased
Pepsi
Coca Cola
Other
Q13. Please indicate your satisfaction level regarding maintenance of Visi cooler by
Pepsi?
Highly Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Q14. Please indicate your satisfaction level regarding maintenance of Visi cooler by
Coke?
Highly Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Neutral
Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
___________________________________________________________________
Thanks for your feed back