Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Knoepp
Leonard F. DeBano
Daniel G. Neary
Chapter 3:
Soil Chemistry
Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Soil Chemical
The chemical properties of the soil that are affected Characteristics
by fire include individual chemical characteristics, The chemical characteristics of soils range from the
chemical reactions, and chemical processes (DeBano inorganic cations-for example, calcium (Ca), sodium
and others 1998). The soil chemical characteristics (Na), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), and so forth-
most commonly affected by fire are organic matter,
carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P ), sulfur (S),
cations, cation exchange capacity, pH, and buffer power.
that are adsorbed on the surface of clay materials to
those contained mainly within the organic matrix of
l
the soil- for example, organic matter, C, N, P, S. All
Some purely chemical reactions occur in soils. These chemical characteristics are affected by fire, although
include the exchange of cations adsorbed on the sur- the temperatures at which changes occur can vary
face of mineral soil particles and humus with their widely. The best estimates available in the literature
surrounding solutions. Another predominately chemi- forthe threshold temperatures ofindividual soil chemi-
cal reaction is the chemical weathering of rocks and cal characteristics are given in table 3.1.
their eventual transformation into secondary clay The published information describing the effects of
minerals during soil formation . During the chemical fire on changes in individual chemical constituents of
decomposition of rock material, the soil and its sur- soils and organic matter are contradictory and have
rounding solution become enriched with several cat- often led to differing conclusions about the magni-
ions. Associated with the chemical interactions during tude and importance of the chemical changes that
weathering and soil formation are physical forces actually occur during a fire. Different studies have
(freezing and thawing, wetting and drying) and bio- concluded that soil chemical constituents increase,
logical activities (production of organic acids during decrease, or remain the same (DeBano and others
the decomposition of humus) that also accelerate soil 1998). This has been particularly true for studies
development. The most common chemical processes reporting changes in N and other nutrients that can
occurring in soils that are affected by fire, however, are volatilize readily during a fire (for example, organic
those mechanisms that are involved in nutrient avail- matter, sulfur, and phosphorus). Differing conclu-
ability and the losses and additions of nutrients to the sions arise primarily because of the method used for
soil.
calculating the chemical constituents. Chemical changes in chemical constituents will first focus on
changes can be expressed in either percentages (or the more fundamental changes in chemical constitu-
some other expression of concentrations, for example, ents in wildland ecosystems.
ppm or mg/kg) or be based on the actual changes in As a general rule, the total amounts of chemical
total amounts of the constituent (for example, pounds/ elements are never increased by fire. The total amounts
acre or kg/ha). Before fire , the percent of a given of different chemical elements on a particular burned
chemical constituent is usually based on the amount site most likely decrease, although in some cases may
contained in a prefire sample that can contain vari- remain the same (for example, elements with high
able amounts of organic matter. In contrast, follow- temperature thresholds such as Mg, Ca, and others
ing the fire the percent of the same chemical constitu- listed in table 3.1). The fire, however, does change the
ent is based on the weight of a burned sample that form of different elements and in many cases makes
contains varying amounts of ash along with charred them more available for plants and other biological
and unburned organic matter. Thus, the confusion in organisms. A classic example of this is total N con-
nutrient changes arises because different bases are tained in the ecosystem organic matter (table 3.2).
used for calculating the change in a particular chemi- When organic matter is combusted, total Non the site
cal constituent (that is, based on mainly organic is always decreased, although increases in the avail-
matter before combustion as compared to ashy and able forms of N are likely to occur as is discussed in a
unburned materials following a fire). This confusion later section, "Nitrogen." Therefore, managers must
between percentages and total amounts was first be alert when interpreting the significance of the
reported in a study on the effect of fire on N loss sometimes contradictory changes in different nutri-
during heating (Knight 1966). This study indicated ents during a fire that are reported in the literature.
that the differences between percent N and total The following sections focus on describing these changes
amount of N started at 212 °F (100 °C) and became in terms of the underlying chemical processes and to
greater until about 932 °F (500 °C). Because of these indicate the management implications ofthese changes
difficulties in interpreting concentration and percent- in terms of soil and ecosystem productivity and postfire
age data, the following discussion on the fire-related management.
Table 3.2- Effect of burning at low, medium, and high severities on organic matter and
mineralizable N in forest soils in northern Idaho. (Adapted from Niehoff 1985, and
Harvey and others 1981 ).
0
0 0
c..
z
0
al 50
a:
ct
u 100
Tropical Temperate
Forest Grassland Boreal
150 Forest
200
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
~
leaf litter eventually reach a dynamic equilibrium
depending upon the stand type (for example, conifer-
VOLATILIZATIO ous versus hardwood) and forest management prac-
_/\ tices used (for example, uncut versus cut, log only
versus whole-tree harvest).
Coarse Woody Debris-Coarse woody debris (in-
\UTTERFA/JI
-HROUGHFA~t.,_
AND
cluding slash piles) is an important component of the
organic matter pools found in forested ecosystems
(fig. 3.5). In many cases it is partially or totally
covered by soil and humus layers, and it has been
found to comprise more than 50 percent of the total
~
UPTAKE __A DECOMPC$0 surface organic matter (this can amount to 16.5 to
\.__MINERALIZATION , ) __ 22.3 tons/acre or 37 to 50 Mg/ha) in old growth forests
GEOCHEMICAL /~ in the Inland North west (Page-Dumroese and others
W EATHERI NG -------------
1991, Jurgensen and others 1997). Coarse woody
EXPORT/
IN
debris, along with smaller organic matter, enhances
!';TJ:lEAMFLOW the physical, chemical, and biological properties of
the soil and thereby contributes directly to site pro-
Figure 3.3-Nutrient cycling in natural environ- ductivity (Brooks and others 2003). It also provides a
ments. (Adapted from Brown 1980.) favorable microenvironment for the establishment
0 2 4 6 8 10
FIRE INTERVAL· YEARS
0.4
zw 0.4
0.3
80::
t:: 0.2
z
!zw 0.2
0
0::
w
a..
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10
ARE INTERVAL · YEARS
Figure 3.6-Effect of fire interval on (A) Oto 2 inch (0-5 cm) soil total carbon , and (8 ) O to 2
inch (0-5 cm) soil nitrogen, Limestone Flats and Chimney Springs burning interval study,
Arizona. (From Neary and others 2003).
Table 3.3-References for the Johnson and Curtis (2001) meta-analysis of the effects of forest fires on
soil C and N contents.
Fire effects on soil carbon, A horizon Fire effects on soil nitrogen, A horizon
I I
l
-{j}- (48) Overall -0-
I
(39) Overall
I
I
Time since fire I Time since fire
(1 5) >10 yrs I
.....
• - - - - - - o - - - - - - - - (5) 0- 5 yrs
(33) 0-10 yrs I
I
~ (1 9) 5-10yrs
Fire type I
l- + - (1 5) > 10 yrs
:c "'>.
(1 3) PF c ~
I
(1 2) BB =o
s: ";"
0
(8) WF
I I I I I I I I I I I I
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent change in soil carbon Percent change in soil nitrogen
Figure 3.7-Fire effects on soil C, A-horizon nonpara- Figure 3.8-Fire effects on soil N, A-horizon nonpara-
metric metaanalysis results; 99 percent confidence in- metric metaanalysis results ; 99 percent confidence
tervals (bars) and number of studies (in parentheses); intervals (bars) and number of studies (in parenthe-
PF= prescribed fire, WF =wildfire, and BB= broadcast ses) . (After Johnson and Curtis 2001 ).
burning of slash after harvest) (After Johnson and Curtis
2001 , Forest Ecology and Management, Copyright ©
2001 , Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved}.
Cations
Cations found in the soil that are affected by fire
include Ca, Mg, a K, and ammonia (NH 4 ), although
these cations are not usually deficient in most wild-
land soils (DeBano 1991). In many studies, a signifi-
cant increase in soil cation concentration following
either prescribed burning or a wildfire has been re-
Figure 3.9---Cation exchange capacity in soil is pro-
ported (Grove and others 1986, Raison and others
vided by both organic matter {humus) found in the
forest floor and upper soil horizons as well as inorganic 1990, Soto and Diaz-FieITos 1993). The NH4 cation
mineral particles such as silts and clays found lower in which is an important component ofN cycling and soii
the profile. (Soil profile from Appalachian Mountains, productivity, responds differently from the other cat-
Nantahala National Forest; photo by Daniel Neary). ions. With the exception of H 4 , cations have high
temperature thresholds and, as a result, are not easily
volatilized and lost from burned areas. The ash depos-
ited on the soil surface during a fire contains high
surface heating. In general, the reduction in exchange concentrations of cations, and their availability is
increased, including NH 4 (Marion and others 1991
capacity as the result of a fire is proportional to the
DeBano and others 1998; fig. 1.4). The amount of NH~
amount of the total cation capacity that is provided by
released by burning depends upon fuel loading and the
the organic component (DeBano and others 1998). The
quantity offuel combusted (Tomkins and others 1991).
amount of cation exchange capacity remaining after a
Some of the cations can be lost through particulate
fire affects the leaching losses of soluble nutrients
transfer in the smoke (Clayton 1976).
released during the fire. For example, the prefire
Monovalent cations, such as a and K, are present
cation exchange capacity of sandy soils may consist
larg~l~ as chlorides and carbonates that are readily
mainly of exchange sites found on the humus portion
mobilized (Soto and Diaz-Fierros 1993). Divalent ions
of the soil. Iflarge amounts of humus are destroyed in
these sandy soils during burning, then no mechanisms such as Ca and Mg, are less mobile and are cornmonl;
present as oxides and carbonates. The formation of
are available to prevent large losses of soluble nutri-
insoluble calcium carbonate can occur, which limits
ents by leaching.
the availability of P following fire. Although these
The loss of cation exchange capacity, as the result of
organic matter destroyed by fire has been reported on readily available monovalent and divalent cations
by several authors. Soto and Diaz-Fierros (1993) in- probably do not materially affect plant growth di-
tensively monitored changes in soil cation exchange rectly, their amount and composition determines base
saturation, which plays an important role in control-
capacity for one of the six soils they exposed to increas-
ling the pH regimes in soils (DeBano and others 1998).
ing temperatures. They found that cation exchange
capacity decreased from 28.4 meq/100 g (28.4 cmol/kg)
at 77 °F (25 °C) down to 1 meq/100 g (1 cmol/kg) when Soil pH and Buffer Capacity
exposed to 1,292 °F (700 °C). The largest decrease Soil pH is a measure of the hydrogen ion activity in
occun:ed between 338 and 716 °F (170 and 380 °C), the soil and is determined at specified moisture con-
droppmg from 28.1to6.9 meq/100 g (28.1to6.9 cmol/ tents. Neutral soils have a pH of 7, acidic soils have a
kg). Sands (1983) examined two adjacent radiata pine pH less than 7, and basic soils are those with a pH
sites on sandy soils in Southeastern Australia 24 years greater than 7. Buffer capacity is the ability of ions
after cutting. He found that the sites that received an associated with the solid phase to buffer changes in ion
intense site preparation burning before planting had concentration of the soil solution.
decreased cation exchange capacity downward in soils The combustion of organic matter during a fire and
to 20 cm compared to no changes on unburned natu- the subsequent release of soluble cations tend to in-
rally regenerated sites. crease pH slightly because basic cations are released
A stand replacement fire in the Southern Appala- during combustion and deposited on the soil surface.
chians that r esulted in a mosaic burn patter n similar The increase in soil pH, however, is usually temporary
High
Sulfur
~
The role of S in ecosystem productivity is not well
> understood although its fluctuation in the soil is gen-
~
::J
erally parallel to that of inorganic N (DeBano and
0
0 others 1998). Sulfur has been reported as limiting in
a:
a. some coastal forest soils of the Pacific Northwest,
UJ
t- particularly after forest stands have been fertilized
en
with N (Barnett 1989). The loss of S by volatilization
occurs at temperatures intermediate to that ofN and
P (Tiedemann 1987), and losses of 20 to 40 percent of
N CAPITAL
the S in aboveground biomass have been reported
during fires (Barnett 1989). Sulfur is similar to P (and
Figure 3.11 - Relative importance of nitrogen low at unlike N) in that it cannot be fixed by biological
different levels of site productivity. (After Barnett 1989). processes, but instead is added primarily by burning
Burn Severi ty
-
C)
~ 60
C)
FIRE
Figure 3.14-Extractable soil N in response to burn
severity measu red on eight studies.
-
E
c
0
:;:; 40
PREFIRE
Cations
-
ca
~
c
Q)
0
c 20
lncrea5e
Prefire
... • • pH
•• Soil organic
0 ... matter
0 Decrease
Dutt
Figure 3.13- Soil N0 3-N and NH 4 -N concentrations Figure 3.15-Generalized patterns of decreases in
before, immediately following , and for several months the forest floor (duff), total N, and organic matter, and
following fire in Arizona chaparral. (Adapted from increases in soil pH, cations, and NH 4 associated with
DeBano and others 1998. Fire's Effects on Ecosys- increasing levels of fire severity. (Figure courtesy of
tems. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. the USDA Forest Service, National Advanced Fire
Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). and Resource Institute, Tucson, AZ).
Forest Service
Wildland Fire in
Rocky Mountain
Research Station
Ecosystems
General Technical
Report RMRS-GTR-42-
volume 4
Effects of Fire on Soil and Water
September 2005
Abstract
Neary, Daniel G. ; Ryan , Kevin C. ; DeBano, Leonard F., eds. 2005. Wildland fire in ecosystems:
effects of fire on soi ls and water. Gen. Tech . Rep . RMRS-GTR-42-vol.4 . Ogden , UT: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 250 p.
This state-of-knowledge review about the effects of fire on soils and water can assist land and fire
managers with information on the physical, chemical, and biological effects of fire needed to successfully
conduct ecosystem management, and effectively inform others about the role and impacts of wildland
fire. Chapter topics include the soil resource , soil physical properties and fire, soil chemistry effects, soil
biology responses, the hydrologic cycle and water resources, water quality, aquatic biology, fire effects
on wetland and riparian systems, fire effects models, and watershed rehabilitation.
Keywords : ecosystem, fire effects, fire regime, fire severity, soil, water, watersheds, rehabilitation , soil
properties, hydrology, hydrologic cycle, soil chemistry, soil biology, fire effects models
The larger bold check-mark boxes indicate the volumes in "The Rainbow Series" currently published. To order, check any box or
boxes below, fill in the address form , and send to the mailing address listed below. Or send your order and your address in mailing
label form to one of the other listed media.
O RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 3. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on cultural resources and archeology.
Send to:
Name
Address
Research Locations
Flagstaff, Arizona Reno , Nevada
Fort Collins, Colorado* Albuquerque, New Mexico
Boise, Idaho Rapid City, South Dakota
Moscow, Idaho Logan, Utah
Bozeman, Montana Ogden, Utah
Missoula, Montana Provo, Utah
~
Federal Recycling Programl•J Printed on Recycled Paper