Annexure – 2: Log Frame (not more than two pages)
Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators
Overall Improved food, nutrition OO1: At least 498 HHs (60%) attained
Objective and livelihoods security 12 months of food self-sufficiency from
by strengthening house- own production.
hold economy and valor- OO2: Malnutrition cases of children
ising women’s role in below age of 5 are reduced by 30%.
decision making of 830
HHs in 13 villages of 5
Gram Panchayats in OO3: 310 BPL families (60%) of a total
Golamunda block of of 517 HHs have a debt reduction of
Kalahandi district. 60% leading to an increase in income of
30%
OO4: 664 Women (80%) are active in 3
types of economic activities intensively
taking optimum advantage of the scope
in the local market.
Specific Increased food, nutrient SO1: Departments of rural develop-
Objectives and cash availability at ment, Panchayatiraj, Forest and Agri-
HH level along with culture approve funds based on Food
enhanced women partic- Security Plan prepared through Com-
ipation of 830 families prehensive Land-use Maps.
across five Gram Pan- SO2: Yield of major cereals like paddy,
chayats of Golamunda finger millets, legumes like pigeon pea,
block of Kalahandi dis- oil seeds like mustard and tubers in-
trict. creased by 30-40%.
SO3: At least 25% SHGs (15 nos.)
mainly composed of landless or margin-
al women earn at least an income of
INR 40000/SHG/year through collec-
tion, processing and marketing of
NTFPs and agro-produces.
SO4: 60% (310) of target BPL HH ac-
cess their full entitlement of 150 days
per HH, per year under MGNREGS. They
also access their entitlements under
PDS, FRA & other social security
schemes. Rest of the target households
at least receive the unemployment
allowance under NREGS against gov-
1
RCDC will share a detail report and database of such cases during project inception period with an assumption that the actual data percentage may vary from the present.
2
Details of SHGs and types of activities involved will be shared within 30 days of inception of the project.
3
MGNREGS is one of the flagship programme of the government to guarantee a minimum of 100 daysof unskilled/semi-skilled employment to a family in year. For Tribal people in forest
area they minimum guaranted days has been increased from 100 to 150 days. But because of delayed payment (7 to 20 days), and other bottlenecks, it is not accessed by many.
Baseline Sources and means of Assumptions
verification
At present*, food availability from own Baseline survey of families
sources is sufficient up to 7 months. and input-output of each of
the crops
Symptoms of malnourishment are visible Health records at Primary
with 50% children below 5 years age in Health Centres, interview
the project area1. with Anganwadi workers,
parents, ASHA & ANM.
The present average level indebtedness of Survey of families; HH debt
nearly 75% families is approximately INR recovered up to 60%.
9832.
45% women are involved in limited and Activity reports; SHG inter-
less intense income generation activities2 views
through SHGs.
No such village or regional specific plan is The Plan document; reports
available. on land use maps, analytic
surveys
Per Ha yield of rice: 11 quintal, finger Input-output assessment;
millets: 4 quintal, pigeon pea: 4 quintal FGDs with practitioners;
and that of mustard is 2 quintal. Individual interviews;
Women in the region have an average Records of women SHGs;
individual income of INR 1500 from NTFP; list of NTFPs marketed;
no woman trades in agro-products. process of value addition.
Only 15% - 17% OF job card holders Unemployment allowance in
completed 100 days of MGNREGS work. case the government fails to
Major current deficiencies with the ensure this as per norms;
scheme3 include delayed payment, faulty Physical verifications; FGDs
selection of projects, unnecessary proce- with the target group; In-
dural bottlenecks and corruption. People teraction with officials
are still unaware about the provision un-
der MGNREGS that if the government fails
No major crop failure.
Households follow proper
guidelines of efficient re-
source use for checking
malnourishment.
Market prices of agri-inputs
and products remain
farmer supportive
SHG members determined
to collectively manage
internal issues for their
betterment; ready for more
or diverse, viable activities.
Community and local govt.
authorities will cooperate.
No major pest, disease,
wild animal or natural ca-
lamity.
Production/availability of
the concerned NTFP/agro-
product is optimum.
The MGNREGS continues,
Panchayats and Govern-
ment lend support for im-
plementation of the plans.
 Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators
ernment failure in ensuring 150 days
work for them.
SO5: Distress seasonal migration4
which is a major vulnerability in the
target villages reduced by 60% (156
HHs) through appropriate convergence
of govt. schemes.5
Outputs/ R1: 830 farm families R1.1: Each village has FSCs formed;
Results and 60 women led SHGs FSCs will federated at cluster level and
are organized in collec- focus on networking, fund mobilisation,
tive networks of 13 nos. convergence and facilitated to coordi-
village specific Food nate with block and district administra-
Security Committees tion.
(FSCs), One Cooperative R1.2: One women SHG Federation is
and one SHG Federation, formed with 26 existing and 34 newly
one FSC Federation formed SHGs at cluster level and pro-
generating additional vide services like bank linkage for IGA
income, collaborating etc. At least 30 SHGs (50%) develop
with local govt for effec- eligibility to avail loan up to Rs 2 lakhs
tive implementation of from block/banks.
social & development R1.3: Panchayat, Block and District
schemes and for in- level consultations (each 3 nos.) orga-
creased/ sustained con- nized in order to sensitize community
trol over farms and on govt. aided schemes & programme
farming systems. R1.4: At least 26 nos. of village youth
(one female and one male from each
village) are skilled on land and water
management aspects and enabled to
supervise the govt. aid works.
R1.5: Steps taken for tenural security
(for ownership over land under FRA and
other land right schemes) of 213 (ST
HHs) or 49 % of total households secur-
ing individual claims and 8 Community
Forest Rights (CFR) by the end of 2nd
year (Dec. 2016)7
R1.6:
Sensitization of administration and
policy makers on the benefits of the
pilot initiatives pursued by the project
by providing with information on how to
replicate these through the organization
4
‘Migration’ here means and includes any form of movement, of unskilled or semi-skilled labourers, to distant places for a prolonged period of the year (8-9 months), for lack of employment
opportunity in the locality. The migrants live inhospitable condition without social security and often face human rights and other kinds of violations.
5
An increase in seasonal migration has been seen in the target region, of which the highest percentage is reported among the youth (29.71%) belong to age group 36-45 years.
(Migration study report of golamunda block of kalahandi district of Odisha- http://www.shram.org/CMS/uploadFiles/document/190214121255.pdf)
6
Details on migration will be reported within 60 days of inception of the project.
7
213 IFR and 8 CFR claims will be settled by the end of 2016. This is excluding the 5 villages where 5 CFR and 121 individual HH claims have been settled.
Baseline
to ensure mandatory days of work to the
applicant then he/she would be entitled for
unemployment allowance.
Almost each village has at least 20 HHs
whose at least one income earning mem-
ber currently migrates for want of em-
ployment opportunity in the locality. 6
No FSCs at present. There are 10 nos. of
Forest Right Committees (FRCs) present in
the region advocating for forest rights and
land entitlements; community managed
intelligence system is not available in the
locality.
There are 26 nos. of active SHGs across
13 villages; no federation is present; Only
3 SHGs out of 26 existing have directly
availed bank support.
There are consultations to understand the
FRA status; however, till date, there is no
such platform created/ facilitated to merge
food & social security schemes.
There are no persons in the villages who
can share and enable others on such
common asset management mechanisms.
Only 5 villages received CFR and 121 HHs
received the individual claims so far.
No such dissemination strategy is prac-
ticed for increased/ sustained control over
farms and farming systems
Sources and means of
verification
Interviews with families;
comparative analysis with
baseline info.
Records of FSCs; newly
formed FSCs; details of
design of cooperative -
model, work culture, stake-
holders and functions;
Records of Federation; rec-
ords of existing and newly
formed SHGs; SoPs of the
SHGs & federations.
Consultation reports; list of
demand and actual target
groups; resolution and fol-
low up plan.
Details of the skill sharing
programmes (3 Refresher
course and 2 exposures);
list of youths with specific
skills.
Physical verification and
documentary verification
100 farmer replication, No.
of publications on website;
articles in newspapers and
magazines, no. of additional
schemes mobilised; no. of
schemes converged; net-
Assumptions
No major impact on pro-
ject’s formulated activities.
Seasonal migrants prefer
staying home.
Govt. officials will support
Cooperatives with neces-
sary information.
Community women can
handle the external influ-
ences.
The govt. officials will be
supportive enough for
inclusive growth.
The youths are mobilized
enough to engage them-
selves in village develop-
ment process.
The facilitation yields time-
ly results with support from
the concerned authority
Along with the project’s
own publications, the
mainstream and develop-
ment media takes up this
crusade.
 Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators
of consultation programmes and 1
workshop, and also through the print-
ing & distribution of 1 leaflet (500 cop-
ies), 1 brochure (500 copies) and 1
booklet (200 copies) so as to ensure
that the relevant information has
reached the concerned persons individ-
ually & directly
R2: 640 marginal and R2.1: At least 360 Ha of additional land
small farmers (100 %) brought under second crop which is
of a total of 830 HHs irrigated through project’s 11 nos. of
(77% targeted HHs) water harvesting and diversion struc-
introduce sustainable tures covering at least 332 HHs (40%)
agricultural practices of the total HHs.
over 900 Ha through R2.2: 26 Village Resource Persons
appropriate manage- (VRPs) facilitate ecological approaches
ment of agro- and natu- of farming articulating the principles
ral- diversity. and practices of composite agriculture
and maintain biodiversity register.
R2.3: Approx. 35% (224 nos.) of small
/ marginal farmers are practicing at
least 3 of the promoted techniques on
Sustainable Agriculture and Natural
Resource Management over an acre
(0.4 Ha) of a total of 0.98 Ha of land
(average landholding of each farmer),
each reducing input cost on agro-
chemicals up to INR 1500/ha/season.
R2.4: 140 farmers develop at least 70
Ha of land with appropriate land and
water management measures (levelling,
slopping, bunding and hedging)
R2.5: A total of 220 Ha of land for 224
(35 %) small/marginal farmers is
brought under crop diversification, crop
rotation, ridge planting, vegetable
farming in the Rabi season (post mon-
soon season) and domestication of
tuber crops.
R2.6: 100 Ha under collaborative on-
farm forestry with at least 5 varieties of
local specific appropriate seasonal,
short term and perennial plants devel-
oped with 150 willing farmers.
Baseline Sources and means of
verification
working established with
various government de-
partments; Booklets on
policy briefs & practices;
Leaflets & posters;
At present*, 150 Ha are irrigated, but only Survey of villages; land use
20 Ha get irrigation for second crop; most pattern, cropping pattern
of the crop lands are rain fed and subject-
ed to erratic rainfall driven crop loss.
There are no such persons available at List of persons and their
village level in order to share or train detail database; clear work
people on composite agriculture approach. plan of each of the persons
supporting other practition-
ers
At present, sustainable agriculture is not Training and later communi-
in practice, and the farmers do not have ty practice manual, reports
much idea about the norms of ecological and follow up plan; list of
farming and natural resource management trainees and operational
calendar; comparative study
on conventional Vs Organic
ways of farming.
People are involved in land development Physical verification; land
programmes under MGNREGS; however, development plans and
these are limited to land levelling which designs.
largely lacks measures to check soil ero-
sion.
The region reflects rice as the major crop Physical verification of
followed by millets (sorghum) farming demonstration sites - 60 Ha
during Kharif season; millet cultivation is under millets (4 types of
limited to sorghum and mostly used for millets, 2 types of legumes
market or is trader driven. and an oil seeds); 60 Ha
ridge planting; 60 Ha under
Rabi legume cultivation; 20
Ha of mixed veggie cultiva-
tion. 20 Ha of wild tuber
domestication
On-farm forestry practices are not prac- Physical verification – spe-
ticed in the region. cies diversity, no. of sea-
sonal (up to 8 months),
short term (or semi-
perennial – up to 2-3 years)
and perennial plants (more
than 3 years); input-output
assessment; FGDs with
Assumptions
Forest and Water Resource
Department authorities
lend support for diversion
of mountain stream water
for crop lands.
The VRPs are mobilized
enough to engage them-
selves in village develop-
ment process.
The farmers are willing to
adopt and practice; ag-
gressive promotion of agro-
chemicals may not limit the
organic practices; raw
material for production of
organic manure and bio
pesticides available suffi-
ciently.
The community is willing to
participate and the PIA will
execute the process within
appropriate time.
Community will accept the
cropping approach; forest
fire or any other manmade
disasters may not occur.
Govt. may not promote
cotton, tobacco or any
other cash. crops;
 Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators
R2.7: Plantation over 150 Ha developed
with 60,000 saplings (with minimum
80% survival rate) of food-fodder-fire
wood based multi-purpose trees
(MPTs).
R2.8: 415 HHs (50% of the total HHs),
produce and apply bio-pesticides by
using neem leaves, seeds, neem oil,
cow urine, chilli, etc
R2.9: Women of at least 50% HHs (415
nos.) are practicing vermi-composting
(size 6X4X3 ft3 for own farm/backyard
application to increase productivity and
improve soil fertility.
R2.10: Village centric MGNREGS status
and its facilitation; community’s report
on food scarcity and livelihoods oppor-
tunity; and Status Report on crop, food,
energy need, and NTFP diversity in
Golamunda Block.
R2.11: Village specific Comprehensive
Land Use Map8 for each village devel-
oped using participatory GIS tools in
order to understand & design better
land use practices.
R3: All 60 women SHGs R3.1: The newly established Communi-
are supported for alter- ty Market Yard and NTFP processing
native income generat- unit is run by existing cooperative for
ing measures to gener- storage, processing (drying, grading,
ate an average of INR packaging etc.), weighing and display-
12,000 per annum and ing the Market Selling Price benefiting
66 landless families add 66 landless families up to INR 6800 per
Rs 12,000 per annum to HH yearly.
their income. R3.2: 5 nos. of SHGs at Panchayat
level, especially with landless/ marginal
HHs have 5 nurseries on pilot basis
providing necessary vegetable saplings
and providing income up to INR
3600/annum.
8
This mapping exercise would include food security as one of its objective though food security planning would require a separate and detailed focus.
Baseline Sources and means of
verification
practitioners;
Forest coverage is open type and is declin- Physical verifications; pro-
ing; erosion rate is high; only two (village) ject records; Biodiversity
sites reflect plantation sites with limited registers; floral diversity
species like Teak and Simarua. reflecting 8 -12 species.
Bio-pesticides are rarely used in the region Physical verification; FGDs
with target group; composi-
tion of bio-pesticides;
No compost production practices in the Physical verifications; de-
villages. signs and qualitative man-
agement guidelines of com-
post pits; FGDs with the
target group.
There is no such status documentation Detailed database of all
made; there is no database yet main- studies/surveys; All the
tained; the data available are from ran- three report documents will
dom discussion across 10 villages. be in a printable mode;
community consultations
records and compiled pro-
cess documentation with
photographs; PRA exercises.
No such land use plan at present; land use GIS maps;
quite erratic and almost uncontrolled.
There are no such facilities in the region. Physical verification of the
sites; FGDs with target
population
Nurseries are not available in the area. Physical verifications; de-
signs of nurseries; FGDs
with the target group.
Assumptions
Community participation in
mapping the MPTs; no
major wild-life attack/forest
fire in plantation site.
Traditional knowledge of
the communities will be
used
Vermi-compost units are
properly managed.
Govt. officials may be
mostly willing to share or
cross-check the status;
village community will
share relevant information.
Villagers are ready to adopt
proper land use.
Local traders may not dis-
rupt the process.
Other actors in the market
(such as conventional
planting material suppliers)
do not pose any threat.
 Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators
R3.3: 66 landless HHs including 10
women headed households (100%
through SHGs) earning INR 12,000 PA
practicing NTFP and other income gen-
eration activities.
R3.4: In all 830 HHs(100 %) women
are practicing systematic backyard
vegetable farming supplementing at
least 100 grams veggie in daily diet,
providing net saving of at least INR 400
PM.
Baseline
NTFP is a regular collection but value addi-
tion need to be promoted. Share cropping
not done in a planned manner.
Backyard farming has been practiced by
few HHs on scattered basis; an average
expense on veggies per family per month
is INR 800.
Sources and means of
verification
No. of schemes mobilised
under government support;
FGDs with the practitioners;
physical verification
Physical verifications; De-
signs of models; FGDs with
the target group
Assumptions
Market linkage is secured
and marketing is efficient.
Government is eager to
support schemes for land-
less farmers.
Women beneficiaries have
adequate scope at house-
hold level for diverting time
for the cultivation.

1 FSC, 1 Cooperative, 1 SHG Federa- Awareness, meetings,

Formation, and tion, 1 FSC Federation and 26 new purpose, role and need to
strengthening village SHGs to be constituted be explained to the com-
level institutions munity; Member selection
and constitution

Training to be conducted Selection of the trainer and

Training for village youth
trainees, modules to be
on land and water man-
designed, preparatory work
agement aspects
to be conducted
Training to be conducted Selection of the trainer and
Community orientation-
trainees, modules to be
cum-training on Local
designed, preparatory work
Self Governance
to be conducted
Implementation of FRA 2006 Individuals and community
land area to be identified,
Implementation of awareness and prerequi-
IFR/CR/CFR in 13 villag- sites to be fulfilled, forms
es to be filled up, liasoning
Activities with govt. Departments
Result 1 (esp. Forest dept)
IEC materials (posters, Printing and designing 1 poster (100 Ideas generated; designing
brochures and leaflets copies), 1 brochure (100 copies), 1 and publishing
on FRA) leaflet (100 copies)
Orientation Selection of the trainer and
Conduct a 2-days orien-
trainees, modules to be
tation on FRA at cluster
designed, preparatory work
level
to be conducted
1 Workshop Project background, objec-
tive, needs, resources,
Project inception work-
materials to be finalised;
shop at field level
involving the community
and local administration
Developing posters re- Printing and designing- posters (400 Ideas generated; designing
lated to eco-friendly copies), brochures (400 copies), leaflets and publishing
farming, millets, hazards (100 copies)
of pesticide, climate-
change causes & im-
pacts, and decentralised
 Intervention logic
resource governance
etc. (Concept, Designing
and Printing)
Media consultation
Organizing block level
consultation followed by
district level (in each
year) with the line de-
partments introducing
sustainable livelihood
schemes
Convergence of Govt.
Livelihood and Social
Security Schemes
Construction of water
harvesting structures
Promotion of land and
water management
measures (levelling,
slopping, bunding and
hedging)
Development of on-farm
forestry planting through
multi-purpose plant
Activities
saplings
Result 2
Development of fallow
lands with multi-purpose
trees (MPTs) saplings
Promotion of bio-
pesticides
Promotion of crop diver-
sification measures with
millets crops
Preparing Community’s
Report Card on Food
Scarcity and Livelihoods
Opportunity
Preparing village specific
land use maps and study
on changing trend in
Objectively verifiable Indicators Baseline Sources and means of Assumptions
verification
3 Consultations Involving media; briefing
on the project and its
goals; specifying the role of
media; taking their sugges-
tions and feedback
8 Consultations Involving local administra-
tion and line departments;
preparing modules for the
consultation process
Meetings and consultations convergence of govt.
Schemes; preparing mod-
ules for the consultation
process; organizing meet-
ings with the local authori-
ties and departments
Construct 11 Water Harvesting Struc- WHS construction- cost
tures analysis, identification of
location, detailed cost-
benefit analysis by engi-
neer, local communities
involvement
70 Ha land used (Farming) Selecting the farmers;
providing support
100 Ha of land used (Farming) Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
150 Ha of land used (Farming) Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
415 hhs to use bio-pesticides through Selecting the farmers;
supplies providing technical support
60 Ha of land used (Farming) Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
Study Permission of the stake-
holders, methodology,
survey, questionnaire and
FGDs, literature review
Study Permission of the stake-
holders, methodology,
survey, questionnaire and
 Intervention logic
land utilisation pattern
Development of Block
level Food Security Plan
Baseline survey and
information collection
from Primary and sec-
ondary sources
Developing GIS maps
and acquiring toposheets
Data processing and
analysis
Promotion of appropriate
crop rotation measures
Promotion of ridge plant-
ing with appropriate
vegetable seeds during
Kharif season
Promotion of vegetable
farming in the Rabi sea-
son (post monsoon sea-
son)
Promotion of wild tuber
crop domestication
Farmers' training on
Sustainable Agriculture
Technology and Natural
Resource Management
Practices
ToT sessions for sustain-
able agriculture practi-
tioners enabling them
as village resource per-
son (VRP)
Community Sessions for
women on vermicom-
posting and its man-
agement
Establishment of women
led vermi-composting
Training on sustainable
harvest of NTFPs and
grading, processing,
Activities packaging and market-
Result 3 ing aspects of NTFPs and
agro-produces
Training to selected SHG
women on vegetable
Objectively verifiable Indicators
Study
Survey
Study and survey
Data analysis
60 Ha used (Farming)
60 Ha used (Farming)
20 Ha used (Farming)
20 Ha used (Farming)
7 trainings to be conducted
1 Training session
28 community sessions
415 units procured
2 Trainings
1 Training to be conducted
Baseline Sources and means of Assumptions
verification
FGDs, literature review
Permission of the stake-
holders, methodology,
survey, questionnaire and
FGDs, literature review
Permission of the stake-
holders, methodology,
survey, questionnaire and
FGDs, literature review
GIS mapping, survey anal-
ysis
Data required, sorting data
Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
Selecting the farmers;
providing technical support
Selection of the trainer and
trainees, modules to be
designed, preparatory work
to be conducted
Selection of the trainer and
trainees, modules to be
designed, preparatory work
to be conducted
Selection of the trainer and
trainees, modules to be
designed, preparatory work
to be conducted
Vermin-compost pit design
to be finalized, cost analy-
sis and selection of women
Selection of the trainer and
trainees, modules to be
designed, preparatory work
to be conducted
Selection of the trainer and
trainees, modules to be
 Intervention logic Objectively verifiable Indicators Baseline Sources and means of Assumptions
verification
nursery raising, man- designed, preparatory work
agement and marketing to be conducted
Community sessions for 28 community sessions Selection of the trainer and
women on nutrition trainees, modules to be
garden development and designed, preparatory work
management to be conducted
5 nurseries to be developed Nursery design to be final-
ized, vegetables that can
Promotion of WSHG led
be used to be listed, places
vegetable nurseries at
identified, management
Panchayat level
and technical guidance to
be provided
Promotion of systematic 830 HHs- personal land used Technical support and
backyard vegetable guidance
farming /nutrition gar-
den
Equipment and Construction Community market yard
and cooperative facilitation
centre- cost analysis, iden-
Establishment cost for
tification of location, de-
community market yards
tailed cost-benefit analysis
and cooperative facilita-
by engineer, equipments to
tion centre
be verified and procured,
local communities involve-
ment
Construction and equipments Cost analysis, identification
of location, detailed cost-
Establishment of NTFP benefit analysis by engi-
processing unit neer, equipments to be
verified and procured, local
communities involvement