Skip to main content

Login
Subscribe
 ABOUT
 SUBSCRIBE
 ISSUES
 ONLINE ONLY
 CATH LAB LIVE
 EDUCATION
C A TH LAB MA N A G EM EN T

Case Study: Using Data to Determine

Utilization and Prioritize Room Replacement
or Construction

Issue Number

Volume 22 - Issue 10 - October, 2014

John Carroll, CEO, Cardiac Partners, Tucson, Arizona
October 16, 2014



Raise your hand if your hospital is required to do more with less. Every facility feels
the pressure to improve clinical outcomes, increase efficiency and reduce costs. The
healthcare industry now appreciates the importance data plays in creating real change.
If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it. Room utilization is a good example.
How could a hospital effectively decide to replace or construct a new cath lab
procedure room without data? Perhaps by physician opinion? Staff opinion? Visual
observation? Cardiac Partners has created a database, CPLink Cardiovascular
Database System, that tracks key performance indicators to help with decision-
making. CPLink reports Room Time, Room Turnaround Time, total Room Time per
procedure room, and many related measures of Room Utilization.
The simplest use of data to determine room replacement or construction is case
counts. You have likely been asked, “How many cases should I be doing in my cath
lab before I need to add another one?” It is expensive to construct, equip, and staff a
new procedure room, so this is a high-stakes question. A simple answer may be: 500
cases; 1,000 cases; or, perhaps even as many as 1,500 cases per year. There are many
variables: What kinds of cases does your facility perform: Interventional radiology?
Coronary? Electrophysiology? Neuro? What is the mix of these cases? How long
does each type of case take? What is the Room Turnaround Time per case? In truth,
the answer to the number of cases needed may surprise you. It is not the number of
cases, but the “Room Utilization” that should determine when to add a new room.
David Fuller, of Corazon, wrote an insightful article about capacity and room
utilization published in Cath Lab Digest earlier this year. In the article, “Running Out
of Space? Evaluating The Cath Lab Capacity and Utilization”1, he describes methods
to calculate utilization. His methods rely on good data collection and reporting
systems, both for use in certificate of need (CON) states to get CON approval, and for
internal use as a management tool.
In the remainder of this article, we will review academic literature related to operating
room utilization, then apply those standards to a proposed definition of optimal cath
lab utilization. We will share a real-world case study, and a new approach to
visualization that simplifies decision-making.

Definitions
A handful of definitions will be helpful. Room Utilization is made up of two parts: 1)
Room Time and 2) Room Turnaround Time. It is obvious that a procedure room is
utilized when it is occupied by a patient, because no other patient can share the room.
From the time a patient enters the room, until he or she leaves, the room is exclusively
occupied. Room Time can be defined as “wheels in to wheels out” where the
procedure room is dedicated to a single patient. The second component of Room
Utilization is Room Turnaround Time. This is the time from wheels out of one patient,
until wheels in of the next patient. Rose Czarnecki, RN, BSN, MPM, noted, “Some
labs define turnaround time as the time that one patient leaves the procedure room
until the time the next patient enters the same room. Another may measure it as the
time one patient leaves the procedure room until the room is ready for the next
case.”2 For the purposes of measuring Room Utilization, the first definition (wheels
out to wheels in) is a better measure. If, for example, there is an endless supply of
patients ready to enter the procedure room, a room is fully utilized when back-to-back
cases with a successive string of Room Time plus Room Turnaround Time occurs
(refer to Figure 1 for Room Time and Room Turnaround Time markers and
definitions).

In the literature
We were unable to find articles addressing optimum room utilization of a cardiac cath
lab. On the other hand, there are several articles that address operating room
utilization, including standardized terms and definitions, and factors that improve or
degrade operating efficiency.
Tyler et al3 studied OR utilization and came up with many valuable conclusions that
can also be used to create standards for cath lab utilization. Their work incorporated
mathematical simulation techniques to determine optimum utilization. Surprisingly,
optimum utilization is not full utilization. Underutilization was defined as time during
the scheduled hours of operation that the OR is not used; and, overutilization as the
time used by scheduled cases past the end of the scheduled time.3 Underutilization
results in idle time, unused room capacity, paid staff that are not productive, and
similar unfavorable economic results. The consequences of overutilization include
patient dissatisfaction from excess wait time, physician scheduling difficulties, staff
overtime, and difficulties of retaining staff due to burn out.
Tyler established a mathematical ideal utilization of 85%, but cautioned, “Our model
creates a situation that is unlikely to be achieved in the real world.”3 He proposed a
balancing of economic interests with patient and staff satisfaction, “For the simple
situation studied here, a target utilization of 85% would approximate what we would
like to achieve in terms of patient delay and overtime. This is perhaps the maximum
utilization that can be achieved within the goals that we have set. For more complex
OR suites, the optimum utilization will be less. Any change, such as cases of different
duration, changes in the variability of case duration, emergencies, cancellations, and
so on, will decrease the optimum utilization.”3 Other stated utilization rates vary based
on real-world situations. One vice president of operations for multiple ambulatory
surgery centers has indicated they “usually shoot for at least 75-80 percent
utilization”4 in the operating room.
Let’s examine each of these OR variables to try to determine the optimum utilization
of a cardiac cath lab.
1) Cases of different duration.
This could vary per facility, but overall, the vast majority of cath labs have a broad
variation of case durations, depending on the type of case to be performed. Cath lab
case duration not only varies per type of case (cath vs. percutaneous coronary
intervention [PCI]), but also has a lot of variability within similar case type (PCI vs.
multi-vessel PCI).
2) Emergencies.
Again, this can vary by site, but most cath labs have significant schedule impacts
related to unplanned emergencies.
3) Cancellations.
This happens all the time depending on lab results, clinical conditions, and the
like. Rather than developing a fixed percentage for optimum utilization of a cath lab,
perhaps there should be a range based on the above factors at a specific site. An
outpatient cath lab, performing only diagnostic cardiac cath cases may be able to
achieve the ideal 85% figure suggested by Tyler. Most other facilities should probably
assess the impact from the above factors, and identify the ideal utilization as within a
range of 65%-80%.

Case study
The genesis for this article was a real-world decision that needed to be made at a
Cardiac Partners-managed facility. Two hospitals, Hospital A and Hospital B, have a
total of 6 procedure rooms. Limited capital was available to upgrade equipment or to
build a new lab. There was a clear sense that additional capacity was needed, but
disagreements about how to prioritize specific improvements or capabilities.
Hospital A facts

 Hospital A has five procedure rooms plus shell space for a

sixth.
 Room 1 and Room 2 are dedicated coronary rooms with
one-year-old equipment, good imaging, shared
transportable intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (Volcano
Corp.), and reasonable floor plans.
  Room 3 and Room 4 are dedicated electrophysiology (EP)
rooms. They each have a St. Jude Medical Workmate EP
Recording system and share transportable BioSense
Webster Carto Mapping and intra-cardiac echo (ICE)
equipment.
 Room 3 has seven-year-old equipment, minor floor plan
flaws, and inferior imaging. The flat detector is large size,
since the room was designed as an overflow EP and
interventional radiology suite.
 Room 4 has seven-year-old equipment, a built-in St. Jude
Medical EnSite Velocity Mapping System, reasonable
floor plan, and reasonable imaging.
 Room 5 is empty, but construction-ready.
 Room 6 is primarily an interventional radiology room with
three-year-old biplane imaging equipment.

The coronary doctors are satisfied with the equipment. The interventional radiology
doctors have their needs met. However, the EP doctors are unhappy. An
electrophysiologist and a neurosurgeon have been recruited to practice at Hospital A.
The neurosurgeon is active in the interventional radiology suite, so the parties expect
scheduling conflicts.
Hospital B facts

 Hospital B has one room that performs both coronary and

interventional radiology cases.
 The image quality and room layout are common
complaints.
 Case volumes are at or near 400 cases per year. A new
cardiologist has been recruited to practice at Hospital B,
and there are concerns about upcoming scheduling and
capacity issues.
  With a single procedure room, hard-down time means
closure of the cath/interventional radiology service line
with ambulances on divert.

Possible solutions

1. Add another EP room to Hospital A.

2. Add an additional room to Hospital B to address imaging
or layout complaints, and to provide back-up if the system
goes down.
3. Replace or upgrade the EP/interventional radiology combo
room at Hospital A.

Solution
Several physician and hospital stakeholders prepared position statements supporting
their proposed use of the limited capital funds. The decision-makers requested
objective information to help with decision-making. Cardiac Partners used CPLink to
prepare case counts per lab, Room Time Utilization per lab, and graphics showing
usage trends. The data was helpful, but took effort to study and digest. We needed a
new way to visualize the room utilization. A new graphic was created that showed
utilization for each room for each hour of the day (Figure 2). The newly developed
report correlates color shades to the percentage of utilization (Light green is lower
utilization and dark green is higher utilization). The graphic indicated:

1. The single room at Hospital B, the combo

cath/interventional radiology suite, is the least utilized of
all of the procedure rooms;
2. Room 4 at Hospital A, the EP complex ablation room, is
the most utilized room (Figure 3), with a high of 79% at 9-
10 am, to a low of 35% for the latest hourly band of 3-4
pm. Daily utilization of Room 4 shows the highest
utilization of 87% on Thursdays at 9 am, with much lower
utilization late in the day and on Friday;
 3. Room 3, the EP/interventional radiology overflow room, is
the least utilized room at Hospital A.

This information was very effective at eliminating further posturing and debate
around anecdotal evidence. The physicians, to their credit, seemed to immediately
recognize and prioritize needs of their peers. The parties decided to prioritize
increased capacity of complex EP ablations and neuro/interventional radiology
procedures. After those needs are addressed, future projects will address Room 3
shortcomings at Hospital A, and a decision will be made to either replace or add a
second room to Hospital B.

Final thoughts
In this article, we sought to provide some insight into room utilization, offering
definitions, industry research and a suggested optimal use for cardiac cath labs. We
hope that this will spur discussion to better define standards for cath lab procedure
room utilization and that readers will share their thoughts. We would all benefit from
working together toward industry-wide standards for cath lab room utilization.
Cardiac Partners has developed and managed cath labs since 1984. Visit
www.cardiacpartners.com.

References
1. Fuller D. Running out of space? Evaluating true cath lab
capacity and utilization. Cath Lab Digest. 2014 Apr;
22(4): 36-37. Available online at
http://www.cathlabdigest.com/articles/Running-Out-
Space-Evaluating-True-Cath-Lab-Capacity-
Utilization. Accessed September 16, 2014.
2. Czarnecki R. An evaluation of cath lab turnaround
time. Cath Lab Digest. 2008 Feb; 16(2). Available online
at http://www.cathlabdigest.com/articles/An-Evaluation-
 Cath-Lab-Turnaround-Time. Accessed September 15,
2014.
3. Tyler DC, Pasquariello CA, Chen C. Determining
optimum operating room utilization. Anesth Analg. 2003
Apr; 96(4): 1114-1121. Available online at
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-
analgesia/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2003&issue=040
00&article=00038&type=Fulltext. Accessed September
12, 2014.
4. Kurtz R. How to ensure maximum operating room
utilization in a surgery center: Q&A with Dawn Q.
McLane of Health Inventures. Becker’s Hospital Review.
February 1, 2011. Available online at
http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/asc-
turnarounds/how-to-ensure-maximum-operating-room-
utilization-in-a-surgery-center-qaa-with-dawn-q-mclane-
of-health-inventures.html. Accessed September 12, 2014.

Related Content
On Teaching Cardiac Catheterization Redux: Explaining Informed Consent
Platelet Inhibition With the P2Y12 Inhibitor Cangrelor
The Advantages of Universal Guiding Catheters for the Transradial Approach
Renal Artery Fibromuscular Dysplasia
The Next Innovation in PCI Is Not a Stent: The Value of Optical Coherence Tomography
(OCT)

CURRENT ISSUE

Volume 27 - Issue 10 - October 2019

RECENT NEWS
Two-Year Data Shows Trend Towards Lower Target Vessel Failure With Indian Stent
Supraflex vs. Xience Stent From Abbott
Penumbra Announces First Patient Enrolled in Study of Mechanical Power Aspiration for
Thrombus Removal in Coronary Vessels
 HMP Acquires Provascular GmbH; Enters into Strategic Alliance to Organize the Leipzig
Interventional Course (LINC)
ACC Leaders Discuss Innovations, Challenges in Cardiology, Mentor Young Cardiologists
at Great Wall International Congress of Cardiology

CATH LAB LIVE

Crossing a Complex CTO Using BTG Crossing Devices

JOB BOARD

Nurse Manager - Adult Cardiac Cath Lab

Interventional Cardiologist and Electrophysiologist Positions Available
Device Technician, Electrophysiology NJ/ NY
EP Advanced Practice Provider NJ/NY
BACK TO TOP

CONNECT

 Facebook

 Twitter

 LinkedIn

ABOUT

 About Us

 Contact Us

 Privacy Policy

VISIT OUR OTHER BRANDS

 Amputation Prevention Symposium

 EP Lab Digest

 IO Learning
 International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy

 Journal of Invasive Cardiology

 Symposium on Clinical Interventional Oncology

 Vascular Disease Management

© 2019 HMP. Cath Lab Digest is a trademark of HMP. All Rights Reserved.