Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tetsuya Tsuruta
Motoyoshi Yamaguchi
Shin-ichiro Abe
Kei’ichiro Iguchi
31.45 · Nagasaki University
Abstract
Author content
Content may be subject to copyright.
+3
Author content
Content may be subject to copyright.
O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E Aquaculture
Received: 26 March 2010 / Accepted: 4 October 2010 / Published online: 12 November 2010
Ó The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2010
123
monoculture, such as by incorporating statistical tests and yield in rice-fish culture. We hypothesized that fish that
equal experimental conditions (see [3, 7, 9]). Moreover, in feed on various natural prey items in paddy fields excrete
all of these studies, the hypothesis was not supported by excess nutrients, and consequently the fertilizing effect of
statistically significant results [12–24]. Furthermore, the the fish excrement increases rice yield. To test this
ecological processes leading to higher rice yield in rice-fish hypothesis, biota, water quality, and rice yield were
culture were not demonstrated (but see [25]). investigated in the rice-fish and rice-only plots in experi-
Since a variety of fish species can be integrated with mental paddy fields, using crucian carp as the Japanese
rice, such as common carp (Cyprinus carpio), crucian carp native fish. We also discuss the effects of fish on biodi-
(Carassius complex) including many species, silver barb versity in the paddy field ecosystem.
(Barbonymus gonionotus), snakeskin gourami (Trichogas-
ter pectoralis), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus),
many different types and techniques of rice-fish culture Materials and methods
systems have been developed by adapting each paddy area
to increase productivity of rice and fish [3, 9, 26]. Many Experimental setup and site
rice-fish farming areas tend to raise nonindigenous fishes,
such as Nile tilapia and common carp, which have higher A field experiment was carried out at the National Research
productivity and/or commercial value, and most of the Institute of Fisheries Science, Ueda Station, Nagano, Japan,
studies regarding rice and fish yields in rice-fish culture from May 2006 to October 2006. The experimental paddy
also have been carried out using nonindigenous fish [12, field in the station is situated at 36°220 N latitude and
13, 16–18, 23, 24]. On the other hand, rice-fish culture in 138°150 E longitude, at an altitude of 455 m above sea
Japan has been practiced with native fishes, such as com- level. The average daily rainfall during the experiment was
mon carp and crucian carp, since the 1840s [27–29]. These 0.121 mm. The minimum atmospheric temperatures during
fish had originally utilized temporary waters around rivers, the experiment fluctuated between 3.2 and 24.3°C, and the
such as floodplains, as spawning and/or feeding habitats. maximum atmospheric temperatures fluctuated between
Since most Japanese lowlands and floodplains have been 15.5 and 35.5°C.
converted to rice fields, the rice fields and irrigation ditches The experiment was conducted as a generalized Youden
became important habitats for them [30–32]. Therefore, the design [33]: blocks, 4 ponds and 4 positions; treatment,
ecological characters of the native fish may have adapted to rice-fish or rice-only plots (Fig. 1). The experimental
the paddy field ecosystem because lowland rice culture in paddy field was built in four 5 9 45 m rectangular con-
Japan has been practiced for at least 2,500 years. crete ponds, which can be irrigated from the Chikuma
The objective of the present study is to clarify whether River. Four 4.0 9 9.9 m experimental plots (these plots
fish farming in paddy fields enhances rice yields and to correspond to positions 1, 2, 3, and 4 from the upper reach
examine the ecological processes leading to higher rice to the lower reach within each pond) within each pond
10 m
123
(ponds A, B, C, and D) were separated by levee (40 cm transplanting, the organic fertilizers, including cow and
height) with plastic boards (Fig. 1) and filled up with chicken manure, were applied at a rate of 47.0 kg nitrogen
25 cm of soil (silt clay loam with total nitrogen content of (N)/ha, 38.1 kg phosphorus (P)/ha, and 15.8 kg potassium
0.053% and available phosphate content of 0.016 mg/2 g). (K)/ha, and the inorganic fertilizer was applied at a rate of
Each plot had an outlet/inlet connecting it to the irrigation 36.4 kg N/ha, 70.7 kg P/ha, and 42.4 kg K/ha. The inor-
canal within the pond. The outlet gate of each plot, how- ganic fertilizer was applied as top-dressing at a rate of
ever, was kept closed until 83 days after transplanting 40.4 kg N/ha and 20.2 kg K/ha at 28 DAT.
(DAT) to increase the temperature of the floodwater,
because lower temperatures decrease the growth of rice Fish
plants. Migration of fish between the plots and movement
of wild fish into each plot were prevented by nylon nets Crucian carp (Carassius complex) were stocked at 12 DAT
(1 mm mesh size) in the irrigation canal within the pond with 9,122 ± 436 individuals (mean ± SD) per hectare
(Fig. 1). In addition, the ponds were surrounded by 1.8 m with a total mass per hectare of 126 ± 7 kg. Goldfish
high nylon nets (45 mm mesh size) to prevent piscivorous (Carassius complex), as supplementary fish, were also
predators, such as herons, from foraging. stocked at 37 DAT with 24,179 ± 1,026 individuals per
Experimental and sampling calendar is shown in hectare with a total mass per hectare of 505 ± 0 kg. The
Table 1. The plots were ploughed two times before the mean body mass of the fish at stocking was 19 g, and the
transplanting of rice using a rake, after base dressing. Rice mean stocking density was 33,302 individuals per hectare.
seedlings (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica cv. Koshihikari) Goldfish, which is an ornamental variety of crucian carp,
were transplanted from a nursery into the experimental plots occupies the same niche as crucian carp in a biotic com-
at 27 days after seeding. Rice was transplanted at a spacing munity, and allowed us to observe that the fish were dis-
of 30 cm between the rows and 17 cm within the rows, with tributed both within the plot and irrigation canal in the
two to three seedlings per hill. Irrigation water was supplied experimental paddy field (see Fig. 1). Fish were not fed
to maintain a water level of 5–10 cm in the plots. during the experiment. Dead fish were removed every day
No pesticides were applied during the experimental from the experimental paddy field, in order to prevent any
period. As base dressing in all plots at 12 days before fertilization effect. At 120 DAT, fish were collected by
draining off the water in the ponds, and then the total
Table 1 Experimental and sampling calendar
number of individuals and total weight of the stocked fish
Date DAT Activities and their offspring for each rice-fish plot were recorded.
20 April -27 Seeding rice in nursery
Algae
5 May -12 Fertilization: base dressing
17 May 0 Rice transplanting
To estimate the biomass of planktonic algae, a 500 mL
24 May 7 Investigation of water quality
water sample was collected in each plot at 69 DAT. To
29 May 12 Fish stocking: crucian carp
estimate the biomass of benthic algae, a 5 9 5 cm quadrat
14 June 28 Fertilization: top-dressing
was chosen randomly from the bottom of each plot, and
21 June 35 Investigation of water quality
sediment within the quadrat was collected with a pipette at
23 June 37 Fish stocking: goldfish
69 DAT. As an index of the algal biomass, chlorophyll
25 July 69 Algae sampling, zooplankton
a was measured according to the procedure of Steinman
sampling, investigation of water
quality and Lamberti [34]. The sample was filtered through glass
27 July 71 Benthos sampling fiber filters (Whatman GF/C; Whatman International,
4 August 79 Investigation of duckweed coverage
Maidstone, UK) and preserved at -20°C until analysis.
7 August 83 Opening outlet gate: running water Chlorophyll a was extracted with 90% acetone for 24 h at
4°C and measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-160A,
24 August 99 Investigation of water quality
5 September 111 Terrestrial arthropod sampling Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
12 September 118 Draining pond B
13 September 119 Draining ponds A and C
Duckweed
14 September 120 Draining pond D, fish sampling
Coverage of duckweed in each plot was investigated at 79
28 September 134 Rice sampling in pond A
DAT. Quadrats (1 9 1 m) were set at three random points
29 September 135 Rice sampling in ponds B, C, and D
within a plot, and coverage of duckweed within the
31 October 167 Threshing rice
quadrats was estimated by eye. The mean value of the three
DAT Days after transplanting points was used.
123
Terrestrial arthropods, zooplankton, and benthic effective panicles per hill, and highest leaf height for 10
invertebrates hills in the lower part of the center row in each plot were
measured at 134–135 DAT, and their mean values were
Terrestrial arthropods in each plot were sampled with 10 used as rice yield parameters of each plot. In addition, rice
sweeps of a 37 cm diameter muslin net while advancing in plants of the 20 hills in lower part of the center row in each
a plot at midday 111 DAT. Specimens from one sample of plot were harvested at 134–135 DAT, and then rough rice
each plot were identified and counted under a stereomi- and brown rice yields were determined after the moisture
croscope in the laboratory. level were adjusted to 14.5%. Rice yield (kg/ha) was cal-
Zooplankton in each plot were sampled by passing 10 L culated using the following equation:
of surface water through a plankton net of NXX 13 (94 lm !
mesh size) at 69 DAT and preserving the specimens in 10% Rice yield ¼ ðRW=20Þ NH
formalin solution. Organisms from one sample of each plot where RW is rice weight (kg) of 20 hills and NH is number
were identified and counted under a stereomicroscope in of hills per hectare:
!
the laboratory.
NH ¼ 10000=ððLR=10Þ ðLH=10ÞÞ
Benthic invertebrates were sampled at 71 DAT using a
cylindrical corer of 9 cm diameter and 3 cm depth (about where LR is total distance (m) between 11 rows in the
191 cm3) [35]. Three core samples were taken randomly lower part of each plot and LH is the total distance (m)
from each plot and pooled to make one composite sample. between 11 hills in the lower part of the center row in each
The samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution and then plot. Number of spikelets per land area (n/m2) was
washed through a 300 lm sieve. Benthic organisms from calculated using the following equation:
! !
one sample of each plot were identified and counted under Number of spikelets per land area ¼ NS NE NHM
a stereomicroscope in the laboratory.
where NS is the number of spikelets per effective panicle,
To estimate the community diversity of terrestrial
NE is the number of effective panicles per hill, and NHM is
arthropods, zooplankton, and benthic invertebrates, the
0
the number of hills per square meter. Grain weight (mg)
Shannon-Wiener
" diversity index (H ) was calculated [36]: was calculated using the following equation:
S ! ! !
X pi ln pi Grain weight ¼ RRW= 20 ð NS NE Þ
H 0 ¼ i¼1
where RRW is rough rice weight (mg) of 20 hills.
where S is number of taxonomic categories and pi is the
proportion of the ith taxonomic category in the total Statistical analysis
specimens in the plot.
The data were subjected to ANOVA for generalized
Water quality Youden design, using the GLM procedure of SASÒ 9.1.
Model sums of squares were separated into treatment,
Water temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen (DO) in the pond, and position effects. Proportional data for coverage
floodwater of each plot were measured with a water quality of duckweed were arcsine-transformed, and data of the
monitor (U-21, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) from 1000 to 1200 h number of individuals of terrestrial and benthic inverte-
at 7, 35, 69, and 99 DAT. In addition, to measure nitrate brates and zooplankton were ln-transformed (after adding
nitrogen (NO3–N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2–N), ammonium 1), prior to ANOVA. However, values presented here are
nitrogen (NH4–N), and orthophosphate phosphorus (PO 4–P) means and standard deviations of raw (i.e., untransformed)
concentrations in the floodwater of each plot, a 500 mL data. For terrestrial and benthic invertebrates and zoo-
water sample was collected at 7, 35, 69, and 99 DAT. plankton, we did not perform the statistical tests for indi-
These nutrients were analyzed using a spectrophotometer vidual numbers of rare taxonomic categories (mean
(DR/2000, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). NO3–N, NO2–N, number of individuals per plot \1), because such variables
NH4–N, and PO4–P were analyzed by the cadmium reduction did not fit into the foregoing parametric test.
method, diazotization method, salicylic acid method, and
PhosVer3 (ascorbic acid) method, respectively.
Results
Rice yield
Algae and duckweed
The water in the ponds was drained off at 119–120 DAT.
The number of spikelets of effective panicles with the Chlorophyll a values as an index of the planktonic algal
highest and second lowest height in a hill, number of biomass did not differ significantly between the rice-fish
123
80
between the rice-fish and rice-only plots (F 1,8 = 2.18,
P = 0.178), and their mean ± SD were 1.05 ± 0.65 and
60 0.74 ± 0.35 lg/cm 2, respectively.
Coverage of duckweed, including Spirodela polyrhiza,
Lemna aoukikusa, and L. gibba, was significantly lower in
40
the rice-fish plots than in the rice-only plots (Fig. 2,
F 1,8 = 86.02, P \ 0.0001). There were also significant
20 differences in the coverage of duckweed among the ponds
(F 3,8 = 6.08, P = 0.018).
0
Rice-fish Rice-only Terrestrial althropods
Treatment
Fig. 2 Mean coverage of duckweed in the rice-fish and rice-only Total number of individuals, number of taxa, and species
plots at 79 DAT. The error bars represent standard deviations diversity of terrestrial invertebrates did not differ
Table 2 Mean ± SD and F values for treatment effects from ANOVA for individual number and species diversity of terrestrial invertebrates in
the rice-fish and rice-only plots at 111 DAT
Phylum Class Order Family Operational taxa Treatment
Rice-fish Rice-only F 1,8
123
Table 3 Mean ± SD and F values for treatment effects from ANOVA for individual number and species diversity of zooplankton in the rice-
fish and rice-only plots at 69 DAT
Phylum Class Order Family Operational taxa Treatment
Rice-fish Rice-only F 1,8
Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydridae 1.6 ± 2.1 3.4 ± 4.9 0.11
Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Turbellaria – 1.5 ± 2.1 –
Aschelminthes Eurotatorea Eurotatorea 3.6 ± 2.9 64.4 ± 68.3 46.00***
Nematoda Nematoda 1.1 ± 1.4 2.6 ± 4.3 0.09
Mollusca Gastropoda Pulmonata Physidae Physa acuta – 1.1 ± 2.8 –
Annelida Oligochaeta Oligochaeta 0.9 ± 1.8 15.0 ± 13.0 11.54**
Arthropoda Arachnida Acarina Acarina 1.3 ± 1.8 0.6 ± 1.1 –
Araneae Araneae 0.5 ± 0.8 – –
Crustacea
Branchiopoda Cladocera Cladocera 7.6 ± 7.3 1,499.1 ± 1,654.8 236.49****
Ostracoda Podocopida Podocopida 0.1 ± 0.4 9.1 ± 11.9 9.22*
Copepoda Copepoda 8.4 ± 6.9 141.9 ± 146.9 21.59**
Copepod nauplii 4.8 ± 7.3 374.9 ± 747.4 25.84***
Entognatha Collembola Collembola 1.8 ± 2.9 1.5 ± 3.5 0.33
Insecta Ephemeroptera Baetidae Baetidae 0.3 ± 0.7 5.6 ± 4.9 8.66*
Odonata Coenagrionidae Ischnura asiatica 0.1 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.6 –
Hemiptera Hemiptera 0.3 ± 0.5 0.1 ± 0.4 –
Corixidae Corixidae – 0.9 ± 1.4 –
Gerridae Gerridae 0.8 ± 1.0 0.1 ± 0.4 –
Thysanoptera Thysanoptera – 0.1 ± 0.4 –
Trichoptera Trichoptera 0.1 ± 0.4 – –
Diptera Culicidae Culicinae 0.5 ± 1.4 0.6 ± 0.7 –
Chironomidae Chironomidae 1.8 ± 1.2 30.9 ± 18.0 40.78***
Ceratopogonidae Ceratopogonidae 0.1 ± 0.4 – –
Stratiomyidae Stratiomyidae 0.5 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.7 –
Coleoptera Dytiscidae Hydroporinae – 0.3 ± 0.5 –
Hydrophilidae Hydrophilidae 0.1 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 1.0 –
Total number of individuals 36.1 ± 20.9 2,156.1 ± 1759.1 292.54****
Number of taxa 9.5 ± 2.4 13.1 ± 1.9 20.51**
Shannon-Wiener index (H0 ) 1.879 ± 0.280 0.968 ± 0.484 43.44***
**** P \ 0.0001; *** P \ 0.001; ** P \ 0.01; * P \ 0.05
123
Table 4 Mean ± SD and F values for treatment effects from ANOVA for individual number and species diversity of benthic invertebrates in
the rice-fish and rice-only plots at 71 DAT
Phylum Class Order Family Operational taxa Treatment
Rice-fish Rice-only F 1,8
rice-fish plots than in the rice-only plots, whereas there The mean value of pH in paddy fields did not differ
were no significant differences in numbers of Hydridae, significantly between the rice-fish and rice-only plots
Nematoda, and Collembola (Table 3). Number of individ- (Fig. 3b, 7 DAT: F 1,8 = 1.68, P = 0.231; 35 DAT:
uals for Cladocera also differed significantly among the F 1,8 = 0.87, P = 0.378; 69 DAT: F 1,8 \ 0.01, P = 0.997;
ponds (F 3,8 = 5.71, P = 0.022) and among the positions 99 DAT: F 1,8 = 0.28, P = 0.612), although there was a
within pond (F 3,8 = 4.75, P = 0.035). significant difference in pH among the ponds at 99 DAT
(F 3,8 = 8.42, P = 0.007). The mean concentration of DO
Benthic invertebrates in the paddy fields did not differ significantly between the
rice-fish and rice-only plots (Fig. 3c, 7 DAT: F 1,8 = 1.88,
Species diversity of benthic invertebrates was significantly P = 0.207; 35 DAT: F 1,8 = 3.54, P = 0.097; 69 DAT:
lower in the rice-fish plots than in the rice-only plots F 1,8 = 0.10, P = 0.756; 99 DAT: F 1,8 = 0.41, P = 0.54),
(Table 4). Although total numbers of individuals and although there was a significant difference in DO among
numbers of taxa for benthic invertebrates were lower in the the ponds at 99 DAT (F 3,8 = 5.86, P = 0.020). The mean
rice-fish plots than in the rice-only plots, the difference did values of pH and DO in the paddy fields decreased until 69
not quite reach significance (Table 4, total number of DAT and then slightly increased at 99 DAT.
individuals: P = 0.053, number of taxa: P = 0.067). Water temperature, pH, and DO showed approximately
Number of individuals for Oligochaeta was significantly equal values among the inlet stream, rice-fish, and rice-
lower in the rice-fish plots than in the rice-only plots, only plots at 99 DAT (Fig. 3) because the irrigation water
whereas there were no significant differences in Chiro- ran through each plot after the outlet gate of each plot was
nomidae and Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (Table 4). Number opened on 83 DAT (see ‘‘Materials and methods’’).
of individuals also differed significantly among the ponds Although the mean value of NO3–N concentration in the
for L. oryzophilus (F3,8 = 7.85, P = 0.009). rice-fish plots was higher than that in the rice-only plots, the
difference was statistically significant at 35 and 69 DAT
Water quality (Fig. 4a, 7 DAT: F 1,8= 2.83, P = 0.131; 35 DAT:
F 1,8 = 16.06, P = 0.004; 69 DAT: F 1,8 = 9.73, P = 0.014;
Mean water temperature in paddy fields did not differ sig- 99 DAT: F 1,8 = 2.27, P = 0.170). There were significant
nificantly between the rice-fish and rice-only plots (Fig. 3a, differences in NO3–N concentration among the ponds at 35
7 DAT: F 1,8 \ 0.01, P = 0.950; 35 DAT: F 1,8 = 1.52, DAT (F 3,8 = 5.24, P = 0.027) and 99 DAT (F 3,8 = 32.09,
P = 0.252; 69 DAT: F 1,8 = 2.07, P = 0.189; 99 DAT: P \ 0.0001). The NO 3–N concentration in the floodwater
F1,8 = 0.24, P = 0.639). There was a significant difference also increased with the progression of the season.
in the water temperature among the ponds at 7 DAT The mean value of NO2 –N concentration in the flood-
(F 3,8 = 18.24, P \ 0.001). Water temperature in the inlet water did not differ significantly between the rice-fish and
stream slightly increased over the season, whereas water rice-only plots (Fig. 4b, 7 DAT: F 1,8 = 0.02, P = 0.895;
temperature in the paddy fields decreased over the season 35 DAT: F 1,8 = 0.23, P = 0.644; 69 DAT: F 1,8 \ 0.01,
with the growth of rice because of the increased shading. P = 0.961; 99 DAT: F 1,8 = 0.02, P = 0.894), although
123
∗
(a) 32 (a) 2.0
30
28 1.5
Water temperature ( C)
∗∗
NO3-N (mg/L)
26
24 1.0
22
20 0.5
18
16 0
7 35 69 99 7 35 69 99
(b) 0.03
(b) 10
9
NO2-N (mg/L)
0.02
8
pH
7 0.01
6
0
5 7 35 69 99
7 35 69 99
(c) 0.08
(c) 14
0.06
NH4-N (mg/L)
12
0.04
DO (mg/L)
10 0.02
8 0
7 35 69 99
6
7 35 69 99
DAT (d) 0.4
123
Table 5 Mean ± SD and F values for treatment effects from ANOVA for rice yield parameters in the rice-fish and rice-only plots
Rice yield parameter Treatment
Rice-fish Rice-only F 1,8
123
concentration in the rice-fish plots led to the higher nitro- was influenced by fish within the rice field and was
gen content in the rice plant, and contributed to the decreased by their predation.
enhancements in the spikelet number and rice yield per The present study illustrated that the use of the native
land area. fishes in rice-fish culture contributes to enhancing rice
Nitrogen is the most important nutrient influencing rice yield through the possible fertilizing effect of fish excre-
yield in irrigated rice fields [47], and the roots of the rice ment. The development of a well-balanced ecosystem in
plants are able to take it up as NO 3- and NH4? [48]. The rice-fish culture highlights a sustainable role of a fish that
fish in paddy fields increase the soil nutrient status [49], is adaptive to the local environments. Therefore, it seems
while uptake of nitrogen by rice plants in rice-fish culture that the use of inorganic fertilizer can be decreased in the
was higher than that in rice monoculture [50, 51]. The rice-fish culture because it is expected that the rice yield
floodwater and soil interstitial water patterns of nutrient of such a rice-fish culture is equal to that of rice mono-
fluxes are also very similar because the rice field flood- culture. Weeds and pests in paddy fields are also
water and the soil form a continuum [25], although only decreased by direct and indirect effects of fish activity
nutrient concentrations in the floodwater were investigated [17, 18, 23], allowing practice of IPM and reduced pes-
in the present study. Therefore, the fertilizing effect from ticide usage. Moreover, rice from the rice-fish fields that
the fish excrement probably increased rice yield in this has been grown with reduced levels of pesticides and
study. Moreover, fish perturbation of the soil-water inter- inorganic fertilizer will be preferred by consumers
face may lead to a release of fixed nutrients from soil to because such rice has value added in terms of safety and
water and make the soil porous for nutrients readily security for human health [53]. Therefore, the adoption of
absorbed by the rice roots [25]. rice-fish culture allows more stable production methods
Another reason for the increase in rice yield in the rice- and economically benefits the farmers [3, 11, 21, 54, 55].
fish plots may be a reduced competition for nutrients Consequently, a sustainable farming system can be real-
between rice plants and weeds. Overgrowth of weeds, ized by utilizing the multifunctionalities of rice-fish cul-
which may reduce nutrient status in the paddy fields, ture, which offers good results to farmer, consumer, and
negatively affects growth of rice plants, and omnivorous or ecosystem.
herbivorous fish in the paddy field decrease the weeds [9,
18, 23, 52]. In the present study, most of the surface of the Acknowledgments We wish to thank the staff of Saku Statistical
Information Center, Kanto Regional Agricultural Administration
rice-only plots was covered by duckweed, whereas there Office for technical assistance in the investigation of rice yield. We
was little duckweed in the rice-fish plots (Fig. 2). More- thank the students of the Faculty of Eco-Tourism, Nagano University,
over, duckweed-foraging by crucian carp was frequently and the staff of National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Ueda
observed during the study period in the experimental paddy Station, for their help in the rice transplanting. We are also grateful to
Ms. T. Hazama for her help during the study.
field (T. Tsuruta, personal observation). Such elimination
of competition through duckweed-foraging of crucian carp
may have a positive effect on growth of rice plants, References
although the relationship between duckweed and rice yield
has not been clarified. 1. Jintong Y (1995) Rice-fish culture and its macrodevelopment in
Biodiversity for terrestrial invertebrates did not differ ecological agriculture. In: MacKay KT (ed) Rice-fish culture in
significantly between the rice-fish and rice-only plots. On China. International Development Research Centre (IDRC),
Ottawa
the other hand, for benthic invertebrates, total number of 2. Shugen P, Zhechun H, Jicheng Z (1995) Ecological mechanisms
individuals, number of taxa, and Shannon-Wiener index for increasing rice and fish production. In: MacKay KT (ed) Rice-
showed lower values in the rice-fish plots than in the rice- fish culture in China. International Development Research Centre
only plots, suggesting that direct effects of fish predation (IDRC), Ottawa, pp 195–200
3. Halwart M, Gupta MV (2004) Culture of fish in rice fields. FAO,
decreased biodiversity in the benthos community. For Rome
zooplankton, total number of individuals and number of 4. Li K (1992) Rice-fish farming systems in China: past, present and
taxa were significantly lower in the rice-fish plots than in future. In: dela Crus CR et al. (eds) Proceedings of ICLARM
the rice-only plots, whereas the Shannon-Wiener index was conference on rice-fish research and development in Asia, vol 24.
International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management,
significantly higher in the rice-fish plots than in the rice- Manila, pp 17–26
only plots. The most likely explanation is that abundance 5. Cai R, Ni D, Wang J (1995) Rice-fish culture in China: the past,
of individuals of dominant taxa in zooplankton was present, and future. In: MacKay KT (ed) Rice-fish culture in
reduced by fish predation, and consequently the Shannon- China. International Development Research Centre (IDRC),
Ottawa, pp 3–14
Wiener index, which represents homogeneity and abun- 6. Lu J, Li X (2006) Review of rice-fish-farming systems in
dance of species, indicated a higher value. Therefore, these China—one of the Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural
results suggest that biodiversity of aquatic invertebrates Heritage Systems (GIAHS). Aquaculture 260:106–113
123
7. Lightfoot C, van Dam A, Costa-Pierce BA (1992) What’s hap- Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in integrated rice-fish
pening to the rice yields in rice-fish systems? In: dela Crus CR culture in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 262:250–259
et al. (eds) Proceedings of ICLARM conference on rice-fish 25. Vromant N, Chau NTH (2005) Overall effect of rice biomass and
research and development in Asia, vol 24. International Center fish on the aquatic ecology of experimental rice plots. Agric
for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, pp 177–183 Ecosyst Environ 111:153–165
8. Yinhe P (1995) Ecological effects of rice-fish culture. In: Mac- 26. Edwards P, Little DC, Demaine H (2002) Rural aquaculture.
Kay KT (ed) Rice-fish culture in China. International Develop- CABI, Oxfordshire
ment Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, pp 189–194 27. Kuronuma K (1980) Carp culture in Japanese rice fields. In:
9. Frei M, Becker K (2005) Integrated rice-fish culture: coupled Pullin RSV et al. (eds) Proceedings of ICLARM conference on
production saves resources. Nat Resour Forum 29:135–143 integrated agriculture–aquaculture farming systems, vol 4.
10. Berg H (2001) Pesticide use in rice and rice-fish farms in the International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management,
Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Crop Prot 20:897–905 Manila, pp 167–174
11. Berg H (2002) Rice monoculture and integrated rice-fish farming 28. Kumakawa S (2003) Symbiosis of fish and rice in paddy field:
in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam—economic and ecological con- ‘improved crucian carp culture’ and ‘crucian carp rice’ in Saku,
siderations. Ecol Econ 41:95–107 Shinshu (in Japanese). Aqua Net 61:46–49
12. Taylor SR, Pakdee B, Klampratum D (1988) Border method and 29. Ichikawa T (2006) Saku carp—description of paleography (in
fish culture: synergistic effects on the yield of rice grain. In: Japanese). Saku 48 (49):4–21
Pullin RSV et al. (eds) The second international symposium on 30. Saitoh K, Katano O, Koizumi A (1988) Movement and spawning
tilapia in aquaculture. Proceedings of ICLARM conference, vol of several freshwater fishes in temporary waters around paddy
15. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Manage- fields (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Ecol 38:35–47
ment, Manila, pp 91–98 31. Katano O, Hosoya K, Iguchi K, Aonuma Y (2001) Comparison of
13. van Dam AA (1990) Multiple regression analysis of accumulated fish fauna among three types of rice fields in the Chikuma River
data from aquaculture experiments: a rice-fish culture example. basin (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Ichthyol 48:19–25
Aquac Fish Manag 21:1–15 32. Katano O, Hosaya K, Iguchi K, Yamaguchi M, Aonuma Y,
14. Haroon AKY, Dewan S, Karim SMR (1992) Rice-fish production Kitano S (2003) Species diversity and abundance of freshwater
systems in Bangladesh. In: dela Crus CR et al. (eds) Proceedings fishes in irrigation ditches around rice fields. Environ Biol Fish
of ICLARM conference on rice-fish research and development in 66:107–121
Asia, vol 24. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources 33. Kiefer J (1975) Balanced block designs and generalized Youden
Management, Manila, pp 165–171 designs, I. construction (patchwork). Ann Stat 3:109–118
15. Haroon AKY, Pittman KA (1997) Rice-fish culture: feeding, 34. Steinman AD, Lamberti GA (1996) Biomass and pigments of
growth and yield of two size classes of Puntius gonionotus benthic algae. In: Hauer FR et al (eds) Methods in stream ecol-
Bleeker and Oreochromis spp. in Bangladesh. Aquaculture ogy. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 295–313
154:261–281 35. Tsuruta T, Tada T, Kotera N, Akagawa I, Iguchi K (2009) Effects
16. Rothuis AJ, Duong LT, Richter CJJ, Ollevier F (1998) Polycul- of predators and herbicides on community structure of benthic
ture of silver barb, Puntius gonionotus (Bleeker), Nile tilapia invertebrates in paddy fields around the Chikuma River (in Jap-
Oreochromis niloticus (L.), and common carp, Cyprinus carpio anese with English abstract). Jpn J Limnol 70:1–11
L., in Vietnamese ricefields: feeding ecology and impact on rice 36. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper Collins, New
and ricefield environment. Aquac Res 29:649–660 York
17. Vromant N, Rothuis AJ, Cuc NTT, Ollevier F (1998) The effect 37. Iwakuma T, Othuki A (1991) Role of chironomod larvae in
of fish on the abundance of the rice caseworm Nymphula de- reducing rate of nutrient release from lake sediment: evaluation
punctalis (Guene´e) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in direct seeded, by a mathematical model. Verh Int Verein Limnol 24:3056–3062
concurrent rice-fish fields. Biocontrol Sci Technol 8:539–546 38. Lightfoot C, Roger PA, Cagauan AG, dela Cruz CR (1993)
18. Rothuis AJ, Vromant N, Xuan VT, Richter CJJ, Ollevier F (1999) Preliminary steady-state nitrogen models of a wetland ricefield
The effect of rice seeding rate on rice and fish production, and ecosystem with and without fish. In: Christensen V et al. (eds)
weed abundance in direct-seeded rice-fish culture. Aquaculture Proceedings of ICLARM conference on trophic models of aquatic
172:255–274 ecosystems, vol 26. International Center for Living Aquatic
19. Vromant N, Duong LT, Ollevier F (2002) Effects of fish on the Resources Management, Manila, pp 56–64
yield and yield components of rice in integrated concurrent rice- 39. Vromant N, Chau NTH, Ollevier F (2001) The effect of rice
fish systems. J Agric Sci 138:63–71 seeding rate and fish stocking on the floodwater ecology of the
20. Frei M, Becker K (2005) A greenhouse experiment on growth rice field in direct-seeded, concurrent rice-fish systems. Hydro-
and yield effects in integrated rice-fish culture. Aquaculture biologia 445:151–164
244:119–128 40. Takamura N, Li J-L, Yang H-Q, Zhu X-B, Miura T (1993) A
21. Ofori J, Abban EK, Otoo E, Wakatsuki T (2005) Rice-fish cul- novel approach to evaluate feeding by mixed cyprinid species in a
ture: an option for smallholder Sawah rice farmers of the West Chinese integrated fish culture pond using measurements of
African lowlands. Ecol Eng 24:235–241 chlorophyll derivatives and photosynthesis in gut contents. Can J
22. Yaro I, Lamai SL, Oladimeji AA (2005) The effect of different Fish Aquat Sci 50:946–952
fertilizer treatments on water quality parameters in rice-cum-fish 41. Xie S, Li Z, Cui Y, Murphy BR (2005) Distribution, feeding and
culture systems. J Appl Ichthyol 21:399–405 body condition of four small fish species in the near-shore and
23. Frei M, Khan MAM, Razzak MA, Hossain MM, Dewan S, central areas of Liangzi Lake, China. Environ Biol Fish
Becker K (2007) Effects of a mixed culture of common carp 74:379–387
Cyprinus carpio L., and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), 42. Hirai K (1972) Ecological studies on fry and juvenile of fishes at
on terrestrial arthropod population, benthic fauna, and weed aquatic plant areas in a bay of Lake Biwa III. Relationship of the
biomass in rice fields in Bangladesh. Biol Control 41:207–213 food habits to the habitat of nigorobuna (Carassius carassius
24. Frei M, Razzak MA, Hossain MM, Oehme M, Dewan S, Becker glandoculis) larvae (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J
K (2007) Performance of common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. and Ecol 22:69–93
123
43. Wada G (1969) The effect of nitrogenous nutrition on the yield- 50. Panda MM, Ghosh BC, Sinhababu DP (1987) Uptake of nutrients
determining process of rice plant (in Japanese with English by rice under rice-cum-fish culture in intermediate deep water
abstract). Bull Natl Inst Agric Sci Ser A 16:27–167 situation (up to 50-cm water depth). Plant Soil 102:131–132
44. Murayama N (1969) Nitrogen nutrition of rice plant. JARQ 51. Oehme M, Frei M, Razzak MA, Dewan S, Becker K (2007)
3:1–4 Studies on nitrogen cycling under different nitrogen inputs in
45. Kamiji Y, Horie T (1989) Nitrogen dynamics in soil-crop system integrated rice-fish culture in Bangladesh. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst
and grain production processes in rice. Influence of nitrogen 79:181–191
pattern as induced by its different application on the growth and 52. Chapman G, Fernando CH (1994) The diets and related aspects of
yield formation processes. J Agric Sci Tokyo Agric Univ feeding of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) and common
33:171–180 carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in lowland rice fields in northeast
46. Horie T, Ohnishi M, Angus JF, Lewin LG, Tsukaguchi T, Matano Thailand. Aquaculture 123:281–307
T (1997) Physiological characteristics of high-yielding rice 53. Iguchi K, Tsuruta T, Takahashi D, Sato T (2009) Evaluation of
inferred from cross-location experiments. Field Crops Res public option on rice cultivation with crucian carp through a
52:55–67 sensory test of cooked rice (in Japanese with English abstract).
47. Kropff MJ, Cassman KG, van Laar HH, Peng S (1993) Nitrogen Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 75:1–5
and yield potential of irrigated rice. Plant Soil 155:391–394 54. Dey MM, Prein M (2005) Increased income from seasonally
48. Yoshida S (1981) Fundamentals of rice crop science. IRRI, flooded rice fields through community based fish culture in
Philippines Bangladesh and Vietnam. Plant Prod Sci 8:349–353
49. Sinhababu DP, Ghosh BC, Panda MM, Reddy BB (1983) Effect 55. Dwiyana E, Mendoza TC (2006) Comparative productivity,
of fish on growth and yield of rice under rice-fish culture. Oryza profitability and efficiency of rice monoculture and rice-fish
20:144–150 culture systems. J Sustain Agr 29:145–166
123
View
Show more
Recommendations
Discover more publications, questions and projects in
Rice
Project
View project
Article
Read more
Article
Read more
View full-text
Article
Radioecological exposure
assessment for the Chernobyl
cooling pond (Lake) with
hydrodynamics impacts
January 1996 · Health Physics
Read more
Konstantinos Stefanidis ·
Eva Papastergiadou
View full-text
Discover more
About Support
Company FAQ
Careers
Business solutions
Recruiting
Advertising