ANNEX “3B”

INTERVIEW EVALUATION FORM

Name:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PCIN (RANK) (LAST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE NAME) (QUALIFIER) (BADGE NUMBER)

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT DATE OF LAST PROMOTION

HIGHEST MANDATORY TRAINING DATE OF CSC ATTESTED PERMANENT APPOINTMENT
PRESENT DESIGNATION & DATE DESIGNATED EXPERIENCE/ TIG (PERM + TEMP)
APPROPRIATE ELIGIBILITY PENDING CASE AT:

NO. CRITERIA DESCRIPTIVE EVALUATION NUMERICAL

RATING
1 JOB KNOWLEDGE(25 pts) VERY
KNOWLEDGEABLE
QUITE LIMITED VERY LIMITED
(SCORE)
KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGEABLE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE
Interviewee’s knowledge and internalization of the PNP
Mission/Vision, flagship programs, critical understanding of
the PNPs capabilities/resources/strengths/weaknesses and (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
threats with creative suggestions on addressing issues;
preferred future vision for himself/the PNP/country
2 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD
GOOD MANAGERIAL/
WEAK VERY WEAK
MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/ MANAGERIAL/
LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY(25 pts) LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP
COMPETENCIES
COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES COMPETENCIES
Satisfactorily understandsthe PNPs organizational
structureand leadership concepts and process;
demonstrates achievements/ accomplishment; shows (25) (23) (22) (21) (20) (19) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2)
sound and supervisory systems and procedures; displays
respectable stance and competent leadership potentials.
3 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD POOR VERY POOR
COMMUNICATION SKILLS(20 pts) COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION
SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS SKILS
Expresses one's thoughts/ ideas/ feelings proficiently/ clearly
with brevity; uses appropriate words/ vocabulary; organizes and
(20) (19) (18) (17) (16) (15) (14) (13) (12) (10) (9) (8) (6) (4) (2)
presents thoughts logically; projects confidence and a potential
speaker.
Page 1 of 2
 ANNEX “3B”

4 VERY CLEAR QUITE CLEAR

SOMEWHAT CLEAR
HARDLY EVIDENT NOT EVIDENT
ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/ ANALYTICAL/
ANALYTICAL/ LOGICAL REASONING(10pts) LOGICAL REASONING LOGICAL
ANALYTICAL/
LOGICAL LOGICAL
LOGICAL REASONING
REASONING REASONING REASONING
Clarity of logical/ analytical and critical thinking; formulation of
intelligent conclusions/ decisions; comprehension and
translation of abstract concepts to practical and workable (10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
application.

5 EXEMPLARY
VERY GOOD
GOOD PERSONALITY/
POOR VERY POOR
PERSONALITY/ VALUES(10pts) PERSONALITY/
VALUES
PERSONALITY/ PERSONALITY/
VALUES VALUES VALUES
Possesses dignified/ respectable personality amidst pressure;
mere physical presence commands respect; typifies a model
police officer and restrained and calculated in emotions and
behavior. Demonstrates sound value judgement anchored on
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
right and wrong; publicly affirms non-negotiable value system;
upholds basic principles of human rights and dignity and
promotes and exemplifies strict adherence to PNP core values.

6 VERY EVIDENT QUITE EVIDENT SOMEWHAT EVIDENT LESS EVIDENT

EVIDENT
EMOTIONAL MATURITY(10 pts) MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY MATURITY
EMOTIONAL
IMMATURITY
Sensitivity to ones emotions and that of others. Aware of life's
purpose and obstacles. Positive attitude and good degree of
(10) (9) (8) (7) (6) (5.5) (5) (4.5) (4) (3.5) (3) (2.5) (2) (1.5) (1)
resourcefulness and acceptance of one's physical and
psychological health status.

TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: This FORM should be used for Promotion to the rank of SPO2 to SPO4. Evaluated by:
This FORM should be stapled to the updated PAIS PDS.
One Form per Board/Committee Member.
______________________________________
Promotion Board/ Committee Member
(Signature over Printed Name)

Page 2 of 2