Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
P. M. Wilkinson
Dr. S. Ganguly
P.A. Williams
L. J. Jensen
TEMCO has been operating for nearly 40 years Minimization of all direct and indirect electrode
producing manganese based ferroalloys in costs on the business, requires optimum
electric submerged arc furnaces using electrode performance, which is made up of a
Soderberg electrode technology. combination of factors:
51(
The production capacity was destined for penetration and reduced the requirement to
internal BHP consumption at BHP's three physically measure electrode lengths to once
steelworks in Australia. Initially South African per month. However overall electrode
manganese ore was smelted. performance, while improved, was still average
due to lost operating time and reduced smelting
In 1966, BHP commenced production of efficiency from variable electrode lengths.
manganese ore at the Groote Eylandt Mining
Company Ltd. (GEMCO) and TEMCO began From 1962 to 1982 TEMCO used paste from
to use exclusively GEMCO manganese ore. At supplier A and then the opportunity arose to use
the same time TEMCO began the first of it's alternate electrode paste. A 110 tonne shipment
many expansions with the addition of Furnace of supplier B paste was trialed in October 1982
2. See Appendix 1 for other expansion details on No. 3 electrode in Furnace 2. The
and Appendix 2/3 for furnace details/capacities. performance was monitored closely against No.
2 electrode, which was on paste A. The results
The electrode systems installed on Furnace 1 from this small basic trial showed paste B gave
and 2 were spring loaded conventionai2 Elkem a slight increase in paste consumption compared
contact clamps, which were replaced by the to paste A. TEMCO decided to continue
Elkem modular holder system in 1987. On sourcing from supplier A who provided regular
Furnace 3 and 5 the original membrane holder customer service, quality assurance, laboratory
Elkem contact clamp system has been retained. facilities and exchange of technical information.
In December 1998 TEMCO became part ofa The quality of paste from supplier A has
joint venture between Billiton plc and Anglo improved over the period between 1962 to
American Corporation. 1987.
1987
4. CHRONOLOGICAL ELECTRODE
PERFORMANCE HISTORY The most significant step change in electrode
performance at TEMCO occurred in 1987 when
1962- 1986 computerized slipping was introduced as part of
the installation of SAFEPAC-144
All furnaces at TEMCO are designed by
ELK.EM A/S. From 1966 TEMCO used This system results in:
GEMCO manganese ore exclusively. This • no regular requirement for physical
Mn0 2 ore was high grade, but also contributed length measurements
to a lower electrically resistive charge and • stable electrical control as less
higher oxidation rates of electrodes than top/bottom limit occurrences
alternatives. Consequently it became very • no green failures (provided system not
difficult to achieve good electrode penetration. bypassed)
Electrode slipping was very sensitive to • elimination of short electrodes
reductant levels/sizing. At this time slipping • more stable process control
was manually initiated, and with insufficient
feedback on amount of baked electrode and At the same time the conventional electrode
maximum slipping rates possible, the electrodes holders on Furnace 1 and 2 were replaced by
tended to be underslipped. Short electrodes, the new Elkem modular electrode holders 2 .
with high off gas temperatures and reduced These enabled the baking zone to be raised in
smelting efficiency were often experienced. the column and improved the electrode break
This necessitated frequent furnace stoppages to resistance.
physically measure electrode lengths. Typically
up to 4 times per month. 1988-1994
In 1976 sinter became available3 • The Mn30 4 This was a period of consolidation in electrode
porous ore enabled .a higher effective charge management and focus on reduction of
resistivity and enabled specific electrode electrode unit costs. It was recognized that the
consumption to be reduced. The combination most competitive electrode paste unit cost
enabled greater control over electrode would not come from a sole supplier
arrangement. So a trial was arranged at Furnace
511
3 with two paste alternatives:- C and D, for 18 respectively. The typical electrode paste
and 8 weeks respectively allowing one week for specifications are in Table 2.
change over between each paste. The base
period was the preceding 25 weeks on paste A. PASTE SUPPLIER kg/MWhr
A 5.7
Furnace 3 operated at a load of25-26 MW, a c 5.7
current of 95-103 kA and a resistance of 0.95- D 4.4
0.82 mn during this period. Table 1 - Furnace 3 Trial Paste Consumption
Summary
Electrode comparison trials should be designed
to recognize: The trial concluded that there was some
• the difference in specific electrode difference between the three pastes.
consumptions in each electrode. It is
incorrect to assume that the consumptions The decision to adopt a two paste supplier
on all electrodes are equal, particularly policy in May 1995 became the focus for
over short time periods. developing a competitive supply position. As a
• that metallurgical conditions in furnaces do result, the unit cost for electrode paste at the
vary and impact on electrode consumption. time was reduced by 14%.
Trial periods need to be of a minimum
duration to reduce the statistical influence The typical plant consumption scenario for
due to process variation. electrode paste became:
• the need to have exposure to furnace • Fl/F2 supplier A 2170tpa HCFeMn
interruptions which is difficult over short • F3/F5 supplier D 2200tpa SiMn
trial periods.
12
Paste D
I0
8
.....
..c:
~
6
~
4
2
Paste A Paste C
0
...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,.
°'::>C: °'::>C: 0:-
"3
.....,
°'en::> °'en::> °'6.. °'t> °'> °'> 0:-u
<Ll
°'§ °'.....,§ °'J:, °'~ °'~ 0:-....0. °'~ °';!..,
....., ....., <Ll 0 0 <Ll
"'
~ <l'.l 9 9 7 µ.. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
~
0
oO
N
°' °' 0
1
....,
0 0
N -
:<;:
0
:<;:
N
N
Week Ending
~
....,
0
tj.
N :± ~
0
00
N
-
00
°'
0
0
....,
F3 FS
Period
No Paste % Breaks No Paste % Breaks
Shuts Shuts
>4hr >4hr
13
1997-2000 This resulted in low liquid paste levels, layering
of paste from successive drums and poor
Following the upgrade of Furnace 3 in 1997 as electrode formation. This lead to increased
shown in Appendix 1, when the depth of the specific paste consumption by 13.8%, as shown
furnace was increased by 400mm and operated when comparing two 15 week periods in Table
with higher current densities, the deterioration 4. Therefore, supplier D was requested to
in electrode performance at Furnace 3 and reduce the binder softening temperature to 60-
Furnace 5 was highlighted. 650C as a compromise paste quality that could
service all TEMCO furnaces. Furnace 1and2
Furnace 3, after the upgrade was aiming to would have preferred a lower temperature but
operate at a load of 32 MW, a current of 110- slumping of paste cylinders and fuming in
115 kA and resistance of0.85 mn. electrode columns at Furnace 3 and 5 might
have been an issue.
Due to a deterioration in electrode performance
(Table 3), pastes A and D were interchanged Period 2/6/97 to 8/6/98 to
between Furnaces 1 and 2 and Furnaces 3 and 5. 15/9/97 21/9/98
However electrode breakages continued to PASTE 63°C 70-75°C
occur when shutdowns exceeded 4 hours. A D
Consumption 3.61 4.11
The consequence of this change created kg/MWhr
problems with liquid paste levels at Furnace 1 Table 4 - Fl/F2 Specific Paste Consumption
and 2. These electrodes operated on lower
current densities (see Appendix 2) and the During this period: extended campaigns were
conditions were unable to generate sufficient run on both suppliers A and D paste at Furnace
heat to adequately melt the 70-75°C softening 5. See Figure 2 and Table 5. However due to
point binder in paste D. the electrode breakage problems and process
changes, the consumption rates are difficult to
compare.
12
10
-
.::
~
8
6
~
.::a:: 4
60-65C
Type D
60-65 c
0
c-- c-- c-- c-- c-- c-- 00 00 00 00 00
~ ~ ~ °' °' °' °' °'
°'§
.....,
°'~ °'~ °'en °'~;::l
.,
(,)
~
....
ro
°'~ 3
.....,
°'.,6... ., °'j,., °'.!. "3~ °'.,6... °'>
(,)
0. 0
'7
,,,}, 4c-- :::E,,,}, ..J.--< 9<'"> Cl
N
:::E
N 4 0 '1
00
Cl
r!.
>";<
00
-1 00 '1
\0
~
0
N 0 N 0
N
N 0 °'
N
0 'r>
N
Week Ending
51
A review was conducted of the electrode • Higher starting currents
breakages, and it was observed at Furnace 5 • Slower ramp rates
(open furnace) that the electrodes were 7. Evaluate the quality of the paste required
initiating small cracks just below the contact for the process.
clamps. It was postulated that with the high
slipping rates, high electrode current operation, The electrode management plan was expanded
additional mechanical stress from higher fines in 2000 to include additional items:
loading and increased electrode movement, • Increase the fin window area by an
cracks were being generated before the additional 50% to improve the shear
electrode was fully baked and cured. strength
• Remove the stress concentrating square
An electrode management plan was prepared in comers in fin windows as cracks were
1999 whose key initiatives were to: observed starting at the comers
1. Limit the maximum current density to • Conduct a trial at Furnace 3 using high
5.8 A/cm2 from 6.2 A/cm2 conductivity electrode paste from
2. Improve the shear stress capability of supplier E to reduce the thermal stress
the electrodes by increasing the electrode fin gradients in the electrodes
window area are by 50%. ·
3. Slow down the amount of electrode A comparison of the paste specifications used in
movement through refinements to the the Furnace 3 trial is shown in Table 6. Table 7
computer control algorithms by over 100%. compares the operating data from the trial.
4. Increase the contact clamp cooling water
by 5°C. to 40°C to raise the baking zone During the trial period both electrode pastes
behind the contact clamps performed well with paste E having a
5. Modify the shutdown routines to consumption of3.93 kg/MWhr and paste D
minimize thermal stresses. 4.52 kg/MWhr. This is a 13% better
• Ramp down electrode current prior consumption on paste E.
to shutdown
• Lift electrodes on power off Figure 3 shows how paste consumption can
• Coverage of exposed electrode vary with furnace operating conditions.
• Minimize draft in furnace Therefore average consumption values as
6. Modify the startup routines to shown in Table 7 can not be accepted as
minimize thermal stress. absolute.
Green Paste
Apparent density 1.55-1.60 g/cmj 1.6 g/cmj 1.64 g/cm,
Plasticity 15-25% 25% 40-60%
Ash 5-7% 6.4% 3.1%
Volatiles 10-13% 13.6% 15.3%
Fixed Carbon 80-85% 79 .8% 81.6%
Baked Paste
Apparent density 1.36-1.41 g/cmj 1.4 g/cmj 1.41 g/cm
0
515
Paste E D
Average on time load 30.0MW 30.0MW
Availability 97.l % 97.2 %
MWhrs I Tapped Tonne 3.77 3.70
MWhrs / cm 8.0 7.0
kg / cm 31.43 31.5
kg / MWhr 3.93 4.52
kg I Taooed Tonne 19.6 22.6
Slipping rates El E2 E3 Ave 38 El E2 E3 Ave44
cm I day 34 40 39 41 45 46
Average kA' s 103 102 105 103 104 104 106 105
Averagemn 0.88 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.8 0.89 0.91 0.89
7
Shutdowns > than 4 hours 9 4
Electrode breaks 0 0
Table 7 - Furnace 3 Trial Operating data
50
45
40
35
30
8
~
..2 25
~
::E 20
15
10
I. ~
I ,
~
I t I
5 11 . . . nu _n
,J .A A II' i ~J l.Ji.nl l I A. ~ ~
'" ~v•·
" I 'IJfYf'Y" !v"V
.,. "'Yll'f,.
0
2S-Aug-9'J 17-Ckt-9'J &-Dec-9') 25-Jan-Ol l s.Mar-OJ 4-May-Ol 23-Jun-Ol 12-Aug-Ol 1-Ckt-Ol 20-Nov-Ol 9-Jan-01
5
100
CX)
80
70
'cf?.
~ (fJ
ro
Q)
.....
co 50
bJ)
20 ·-----··-·---------·--··-······ -- ······--------
10 ·- ---- -·- -·· ············-····----·····--····------ ------------------···---------------------------- -
O+--,--r--r--r---,~...---,---,--,--,--,-....,__,......,.........-11~....................__......,.........-11H
3 5 7 9 11 3 5 7 9 11
1999 200)
517
APPENDIX 1 - TEMCO HISTORY
c:J
, 11MW I I Power 11 71GWH I
Computer Control Extend F3
Casting Machines Casting machine
Wharf Crane
Product Crushing Plant
<D
..
• Brick
Carbon Block
Carbon paste
152
taphole
1 563
228
tap hole
1 068
227
taphole
1 036
230
taphole
1 065
..
Current Operating Data:
Furnace load (MW) 20 (FeMn) 20 (FeMn) 32 (SiMn) 28
..
Max. Electrode current (KA) 90 90 115 115
2
KW/M of Hearth 440.9 440.9 487 .7 523.8
Current Density A/cm 2 5.8 5.8 6.1 6.1
Last Reline Date Aug 1991 Dec 1999 Sep 1997 Mar 1993
APPENDIX 3 - TEMCO FURNACE DETAILS
m
B
i I 1 H ·I
i : ~ Dimension
A
Furnace 1
10 008
Furnace 2
10 008
Furnace 3
12 250
Furnace 5
9 640
W
I
c K D
E
3 700
1 914
3 700
1 914
5 825
1 285
3 788
1 490
F 1 400 1 400 1 550 1 550
E G 3 404 3 404 4 250 3 600
H 1 951 1 953 2427 1 636
!!!