Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

PART ONE

COVERAGE FOR SESSION 1

INTRODUCTION OF THE COURSE

I. DEFINITION OF PROPERTY
A. Classification under the Civil Code
Movable and Immovable (Arts 415-417)
Article 415. The following are immovable property:
(1) Land, buildings, roads and constructions of all kinds adhered to the soil;
(2) Trees, plants, and growing fruits, while they are attached to the land or form an integral part of an
immovable;
(3) Everything attached to an immovable in a fixed manner, in such a way that it cannot be separated
therefrom without breaking the material or deterioration of the object;
(4) Statues, reliefs, paintings or other objects for use or ornamentation, placed in buildings or on lands
by the owner of the immovable in such a manner that it reveals the intention to attach them
permanently to the tenements;
(5) Machinery, receptacles, instruments or implements intended by the owner of the tenement for an
industry or works which may be carried on in a building or on a piece of land, and which tend directly to
meet the needs of the said industry or works;
(6) Animal houses, pigeon-houses, beehives, fish ponds or breeding places of similar nature, in case their
owner has placed them or preserves them with the intention to have them permanently attached to the
land, and forming a permanent part of it; the animals in these places are included;
(7) Fertilizer actually used on a piece of land;
(8) Mines, quarries, and slag dumps, while the matter thereof forms part of the bed, and waters either
running or stagnant;
(9) Docks and structures which, though floating, are intended by their nature and object to remain at a
fixed place on a river, lake, or coast;
(10) Contracts for public works, and servitudes and other real rights over immovable property.

CHAPTER 2
Movable Property
Article 416. The following things are deemed to be personal property:
(1) Those movables susceptible of appropriation which are not included in the preceding article;
(2) Real property which by any special provision of law is considered as personalty;
(3) Forces of nature which are brought under control by science; and
(4) In general, all things which can be transported from place to place without impairment of the real
property to which they are fixed. (335a)
Article 417. The following are also considered as personal property:
(1) Obligations and actions which have for their object movables or demandable sums; and
(2) Shares of stock of agricultural, commercial and industrial entities, although they may have real
estate.

Davao Sawmill c. Castillo – machinery placed by owner of the tenement, not when placed by tenant,
usufructuary or any other person with temporary rights only
Berkenkotter v. Cu Unjieng - The installation of the machinery and equipment in question in the central
of the Mabalacat Sugar Co., Inc., in lieu of the other of less capacity existing therein, for its sugar
industry, converted them into real property by reason of their purpose, because, as essential and
principal elements of a sugar central, without them the sugar central would be unable to function or
carry on the industrial purpose for which it was established. Inasmuch as the central is permanent in
character, the necessary machinery and equipment installed for carrying on the sugar industry for which
it has been established must necessarily be permanent.
Holding machinery as security for purchase cannot alter the permanent character of the machinery

Lopez v. Orosa – the inclusion of the building, separate and distinct from the land, in the enumeration of
what constitute real properties could mean only one thing, that a building is by itself an immovable
property.
A building is an immovable property irrespective of whether or not said structure and the land on which
it is adhered to belong to the same owner.
Materialman's lien attaches merely to the immovable property for the construction or repair of which
the obligation was incurred. Thus, the interest of the mortgagee over the land is superior to and cannot
be made subject to the said materialman's lien.

Associated Insurance v. Iya - As personal properties could only be the subject of a chattel mortgage, the
execution of a chattel mortgage on a building is invalid and a nullity, the registration of the chattel
notwithstanding.

Tumalad v. Vicencio - the parties to a contract may by agreement treat as personal property that which
by nature would be real property. Parties who intended to treat the same as such should not be allowed
to make an inconsistent stand by claiming otherwise.
It is the defendants-appellants themselves, as debtors-mortgagors, who are attacking the validity of the
chattel mortgage in this case. The doctrine of estoppel therefore applies to the herein defendants-
appellants, having treated the subject house as personality.

Makati Leasing v. Wearever - in the Tumalad case may be considered as personal property for purposes
of executing a chattel mortgage thereon as long as the parties to the contract so agree and no innocent
third party will be prejudiced thereby, there is absolutely no reason why a machinery, which is movable
in its nature and becomes immobilized only by destination or purpose, may not be likewise treated as
such. This is really because one who has so agreed is estopped from denying the existence of the chattel
mortgage.

Board of Assessment Appeals v. Meralco - They cannot be included under paragraph 3 (Art415), as they
are not attached to an immovable in a fixed manner, and they can be separated without breaking the
material or causing deterioration upon the object to which they are attached.
These steel towers or supports do not also fall under paragraph 5 (Art415), for they are not machineries,
receptacles, instruments or implements, and even if they were, they are not intended for industry or
works on the land. Petitioner is not engaged in an industry or works in the land in which the steel
supports or towers are constructed.
Meralco Securities v. Board of Assessment Appeals – Art 415, par 1 and 3

Caltex v. Central Board of Assessment Appeals – Art 415, par 5

Benguet Corp v. Central Board of Assessment Appeals – Art 415, par 1 and 8

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen