QUALITY CONTROL

VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT

IDENTIFICATION
PROJECT: CUARTO PUENTE
ÍTEM: PILE
ITEM TAG: PILE A-123
DESCRIPTION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
TYPE OF VISUAL INSPECTION DIRECT
QUALITY REQUIREMENT AWS D1.1
CRITERIA/ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION Table 6.1 AWS D1.1
WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION N/A
EVALUATION RESULTS
COMMENTS YES NO MEASURE ACCEPTED REJECTED REPAIR
CRACKS P P
POROSITY P P
LACK OF FUSION P P
SLAG P P This report repr
indications, therefor
UNDERCUT P P
HIGH-LOW P P
IRREGULAR PROFILE P P
INCOMPLETE WELDING P P
PHOTO REPORT

Final comments FINAL APPROVAL

RESPONSIBLE NAMES
The welds of the evaluated elements INSPECTOR Ing. Mario Muñoz
comply with the profiles of the drawings QA/QC
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1.
 The welds of the evaluated elements
comply with the profiles of the drawings
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1. SUPERVISOR Ing. Mario Muñoz
QA/QC SUPERVISION
 JAMSA NDT PANAMÁ
UALITY CONTROL Pag 1 of 2
RECORD JAMSA-3182
AL INSPECTION REPORT Rev. 01
REV.
IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION: FARFAM YARD-VERACRUZ
DATE: 8/10/2019
PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED Visual inspection
TION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
DIRECT
BASE MATERIAL API 5L X 60
FILLER MATERIAL E-8018
TYPE WELD SMAW

OBSERVATION

This report represents all welds that did NOT present relevant
indications, therefore, they comply with the acceptance criteria in Table
6.1 of AWS D1.1.

PHOTO REPORT

FINAL APPROVAL
NAMES SIGNATURE DATE
Ing. Mario Muñoz 8/10/2019
Ing. Mario Muñoz 8/10/2019
 QUALITY CONTROL
VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT

IDENTIFICATION
PROJECT: ELEVATOR SMITHSONIAN
ÍTEM: BASES FOR ELEVATOR
ITEM TAG: REINFORCEMENT BASES
DESCRIPTION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
TYPE OF VISUAL INSPECTION DIRECT
QUALITY REQUIREMENT AWS D1.1
CRITERIA/ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION Table 6.1 AWS D1.1
WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION N/A
EVALUATION RESULTS
COMMENTS YES NO MEASURE ACCEPTED REJECTED REPAIR
CRACKS P P
POROSITY P P
LACK OF FUSION P P
SLAG P P This report repr
indications, therefor
UNDERCUT P P
HIGH-LOW P P
IRREGULAR PROFILE P P
INCOMPLETE WELDING P P
PHOTO REPORT

verification of bezels for SMAW welding process welding inspection on iron b

Final comments FINAL APPROVAL

RESPONSIBLE NAMES
The welds of the evaluated elements INSPECTOR Tec. Leonardo A. Suarez
comply with the profiles of the drawings QA/QC
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1.
 The welds of the evaluated elements
comply with the profiles of the drawings
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1. SUPERVISOR Ing. Mario Muñoz
QA/QC SUPERVISION
 JAMSA NDT PANAMÁ
UALITY CONTROL Pag 2 of 4
RECORD JAMSA-3182
AL INSPECTION REPORT Rev. 01
REV.

LOCATION: FACTORY METALPAN

DATE: 2/9/2019
PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED Visual inspection
TION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
DIRECT
BASE MATERIAL A572 GR 50
FILLER MATERIAL E-7018
TYPE WELD SMAW

OBSERVATION

This report represents all welds that did NOT present relevant
indications, therefore, they comply with the acceptance criteria in Table
6.1 of AWS D1.1.

PHOTO REPORT

welding inspection on iron bases (1-2)joints for 7/8" reinforcement

bars¨

FINAL APPROVAL
NAMES SIGNATURE DATE
Tec. Leonardo A. Suarez 9/3/2019
Ing. Mario Muñoz 9/3/2019
 QUALITY CONTROL
VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT

IDENTIFICATION
PROJECT: ELEVATOR SMITHSONIAN
ÍTEM: BASES FOR ELEVATOR
ITEM TAG: REINFORCEMENT BASES
DESCRIPTION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
TYPE OF VISUAL INSPECTION DIRECT
QUALITY REQUIREMENT AWS D1.1
CRITERIA/ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION Table 6.1 AWS D1.1
WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION N/A
EVALUATION RESULTS
COMMENTS YES NO MEASURE ACCEPTED REJECTED REPAIR
CRACKS P P
POROSITY P P
LACK OF FUSION P P
SLAG P P This report repr
indications, therefor
UNDERCUT P P
HIGH-LOW P P
IRREGULAR PROFILE P P
INCOMPLETE WELDING P P
PHOTO REPORT

verification of the assembly process Verification

Final comments FINAL APPROVAL

RESPONSIBLE NAMES
The welds of the evaluated elements INSPECTOR Tec. Leonardo A. Suarez
comply with the profiles of the drawings QA/QC
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1.
 The welds of the evaluated elements
comply with the profiles of the drawings
and the acceptance criteria of the AWS
code D1.1. SUPERVISOR Ing. Mario Muñoz
QA/QC SUPERVISION
 JAMSA NDT PANAMÁ
UALITY CONTROL Pag 3 of 4
RECORD JAMSA-3182
AL INSPECTION REPORT Rev. 01
REV.

LOCATION: FACTORY METALPAN

DATE: 2/9/2019
PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED Visual inspection
TION OF VISUAL INSPECTION
DIRECT
BASE MATERIAL A572 GR 50
FILLER MATERIAL E-7018
TYPE WELD SMAW

OBSERVATION

This report represents all welds that did NOT present relevant
indications, therefore, they comply with the acceptance criteria in Table
6.1 of AWS D1.1.

PHOTO REPORT

Verification of the welding process

FINAL APPROVAL
NAMES SIGNATURE DATE
Tec. Leonardo A. Suarez 9/3/2019
Ing. Mario Muñoz 9/3/2019
 QUALITY CONTROL
LIQUID PENETRANT REPORT

ITEM TAG PILE A-123

QUALITY REQUIREMENT AWS X ASME API

PROJECT/PLACE CUARTO PUENTE-FARFAM

PHOTO REPORT

Technique development LP method 2 type C (Visible

removable with solvent) Development process
discon

METHOD OF INSPECTION USED

PENETRANT REMOVER EMULSIFIER
VISIBLE X AQUEOUS LIPOPHILIC
FLUORESCENT SOLVENT X HYDROPHILIC
POST-EMULSIFIABLE LIGHTING
SOLVENT REMOVABLE X VISIBLE AMBIENT LIGHT X BLACK LIGHT
WATER WASHABLE POST CLEANING

INSPECTION RESULTS

Interpretation
SURFACE DISCONTINUITY REPAIR ACCEPTED REJEC
NO YES
CRACKS P P
POROSITY P P
LACK OF FUSION P P
 SLAG P P
UNDERCUT P P
HIGH-LOW P P
IRREGULAR PROFILE P P
INCOMPLETE WELDING P P

FINAL ANNOTATION FINAL APPROVAL

RESPONSIBLE NAMES S
WELDINGS EVALUATED BY PENETRANT DYES, INSPECTOR Tec. Leonardo A. Suarez
COMPLY WITH THE AWS ACCEPTANCE QA/QC
CRITERIA D1.1 SUPERVISOR Ing. Mario Muñoz
QA/QC SUPERVISION
 JAMSA NDT PANAMÁ ###
Pag 2 of 2
DATE 8/10/2019
REV. Rev 01

PILE A-123

OTHER
CUARTO PUENTE-FARFAM

TO REPORT

Development process, did not show relevant

discontinuities

INSPECTION USED
DEVELOPER
DRY POWDER
AQUEOUS
NONAQUEOUS WET X

IF REQUIRED

TION RESULTS

REJECTED OBSERVATION
FINAL APPROVAL
SIGNATURE DATE
8/10/2019

8/10/2019
 2.25
57.15
 Table 1 bases iron for elevator
Inspection status
ITEM(PLATE)
TEST METHOD USED Accepted Repair Rejected
VT X
1
PT X
VT X
2
PT X X

3 VT X

4 VT X

VT X
E
VT X
VT X
F
VT X
VT X
G
VT X
VT X
H
VT X

Tabla 2 (cerchas 9'-11)

Estatus de la Inspección
Elemento
ENSAYO APLICADO Aceptado Reparado Rechazado
VT X
A
VT X
VT X
B
VT X
VT X X
C
VT X X
VT X
D
VT X
VT X
E
VT X
VT X X
F
VT X X
VT X
G
VT X
VT X X
H
VT X

Tabla 3 (cerchas 11-12)FRONTAL

Estatus de la Inspección
Elemento
ENSAYO APLICADO Aceptado Reparado Rechazado
VT X
A
VT X
VT X
B
VT X
 VT X
C
VT X
VT X
D
VT X X
VT X
E
VT X
VT X
F
VT X
VT X
G
VT X X
VT X
H
VT X
VT X X
I
VT X X
VT X
J
VT X
VT X
K
VT X

Tabla 4 (cerchas 11-12)POSTERIOR

Estatus de la Inspección
Elemento
ENSAYO APLICADO Aceptado Reparado Rechazado
VT X
A
VT X
VT X
B
VT X
VT X
C
VT X
VT X
D
VT X
VT X
E
VT X X
VT X
F
VT X
VT X
G
VT X
VT X
H
VT X X
VT X
I
VT X
VT X
J
VT X
VT X
K
VT X
for elevator
Observations

IT IS RECOMMENDED TO HAVE THE TOOLS NEAR TO

THE OPERATOR, FOR A GREATER EFFICIENCY

IT IS RECOMMENDED TO REACH A GOOD

PENETRATION WITH THE ELECTRODE

NO RELEVANT DISCONTINUITY FOUND

NO RELEVANT DISCONTINUITY FOUND

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

s 9'-11)
Observaciones

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

12)FRONTAL
Observaciones

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

 NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

2)POSTERIOR
Observaciones

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

NO SE ENCONTRO DISCONTINUIDAD RELEVANTE.

 Elementos de Viga
Estatus de Inspección
Conexión Ensayo No Observaci
Aplicado Aceptado Reparado
de viga conforme ón
V-1 VT/UT X

Se
encontrar
on
indicacion
es, se
reparó en
sitio
V-1 (2) VT/ UT X X
V-1 (3) VT X
V-1 (4) VT/UT X
V-1 (5) VT X
Se reparó
V-2 VT/UT X X
en sitio
V-2 (2) VT/PT X
V-4 VT X
V-5 VT X
V-7 VT X
V-8 VT X
V-9 VT X
V-10 VT X
V-11 VT X
V-12 VT/UT X
V-12 (2) VT/PT X
V-12 (3) VT X
V-12 (4) VT X
V-14 VT X
V-15 VT X
A B C

A B C
D E F G H I J K

CERCHA FRONTAL

D E F G H I J K

CERCHA POSTERIOR
ARRIBA

ABAJO

ARRIBA

ABAJO