Sie sind auf Seite 1von 75

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Problem

Reading is one of the four language skills which is beside speaking,

listening, writing. unlike speaking and listening which people most of time are

automatically able to do them, reading then must be taught and it can not be done

unintentionally. there must be such a teaching learning process that has to be

conducted, before a child is able to read. accordingly, peole should be taught how

to read as early as possible, perhaps since they are four or five years.

English Reading habit has must be owned for everyone, because it has many

advantages such as, Improve language skill, Future career, Access to social,

Increase knowledge, entertaining, etc. Richard Bamberger (1975, p.7) the

important of reading habits. He stated that reading is the most effective means of

systematic language that work for a person.Meanwhile, Kushmeeta Chettri (2013,

p.13) said “Reading is a man‟s bulwark against loneliness- his window on life, his

unending delight. It brings yesterday and tomorrow into now”. In other word,

reading provides experience through which the individual may expand his

horizons of knowledge, identify, extend and intensify his interest and gains deeper

understanding of himself, of other human beings and of the world. He added that

in this 21th century, people must have adequate time for reading to adapt new

technology in getting information in sources such as book, megazine, newspaper,

and internet. We can conclude that reading is the major key to making progress in

learning while inability to read well may make a student to fall progressively

1
behind other members of the class In fact, reading habits among students in

Indonesia is still at very low level.

Erna Iftanti (2012,p.160) on her study about students reading habit stated

that student in Indonesia are generally not having a good reading habits, even

some student never read a single book in a day and just read when there is a task

from the school. In other word, student are not reading for pleasure but because of

force from the school. Surely reading habits is so much determining student

performance especially in English subject.

Fidzani (1998,p.169) in his study said, stressed that the book is still very

much part of people lives in our modern society an in spite of the invention of the

lates audio-visual materials, the book in its ordinary conventional form is still the

most important material for acquiring knowledge and information. The

enrichment in knowledge would, in turn, enable one of to present oneself more

confidently. Meanwhile, it important to encourage a love of reading in reluctant or

struggling readers, an effort that has been focus of a great deal of research over

the last several decades, it is equally essential to ensure that accelerated readers

continue to enjoy reading and are supplied with appropriate reading materials.

Reading comprehension skill therefore is on of crucial factors related to

students’ success. Thus, reading habit viewed as one of the factors relating the

succes of reading comprehension. By reading, students can build language skills,

adding their vocabulary knowledge, and fluency in reading. Therefore, to enhance

reading comprehension, it is necessary to improve reading habit of the students.

2
Based on an explanation above, it migh assume that reading habit is vey

important to generate the reading skills because it is useful as the media for the

process of reading. How can the students have the good ability in understanding

reading texts if they do not have reading reading habit or reading experience? By

reading habit and reading all material from many branches and discipline, the

students have a place to practice their reading skills and they get new knowledge

and information about text.

There are several issues related to reading habit and reading comprehension

achievement. Cha, Ko, and Tse in Wahyudi (2008,p.2) stated that home

environment positively correlates with children’s reading comprehension. It has

been revealed that positive attitudes and high motivation are associated with

reading comprehension and reading habit. According to Zwiers (2004,p.3),

reading habit more clearly describe the automatic and unconscious processes that

are involved in constructing meaning from text. Thus, by this activity the readers

can improve their reading ability.Moreover, Patel and Jain (2008,p.114) say that

reading habits not only help the student to get knowledge and wisdom from the

cultural of heritage, but are also very helpful in passing for leisure period. So, the

improvement of reading comprehension depends on the application of reading

habit.

Junior High School 14 Pekanbaru is one of the junior high schools in

pekanbaru city. It uses 13 curriculum as their guidance. In K13 curriculum, it

insists on students to be more active. Students are expected to work on their own

to find their own way to study. Based on the preliminary research by interviewed

the teacher named Mrs. Susi Rahmayeni, S.Pd, April 13th 2018. She said

3
“Students reading comprehension are low and some of the students have difficulty

to determine the generic structure of the text”

Furthermore, students almost have some problems which were they are not

really able to comprehend the text. Thus, based on the result interviewed of

english teacher, the problem can be seen into some phenomena. Such as :

1. Some of the students are difficult to determine the meaning of the text.

2. Some of the students are to difficult to conclude the text.

3. Some of the students are not able to determine the generic structure of

the text.

4. Some of the students are lack in vocabulary.

5. Some of the students are not interested in reading class.

Based on those problems and phenomena, the writer is interested in conducting a

research to dig more information about the students reading habits and its effect

on students reading habit at the seventh grade of Junior High School 14

Pekanbaru. Thus, the title of this research is ”The Relationship between

Students’ Reading Habit and Their Reading Comprehension at State Junior

High School 14 Pekanbaru”

B. Identification of the problem

Based on the background of the study, there were many problems that

could be identified. The problems were as follows :

1) Why are some of students unable to determine the meaning of the text?

2) Why are some of the students unable to conclude the text?

3) Why are some of the students unable to determine the generic structure

of text?

4
4) Why are some of the students lack in vocabulary?

5) Why are some of the students not interesting in reading class?

C. Limitation of the problem

The researcher focuses on the relationship between students’ reading habit

and their reading comprehension in descriptive text based on the syllabus

that is used in Junior High School 14 Pekanbaru.

D. Formulation of the problem

a. How is the student’s reading habit at the seventh grade of Junior

High School 14 pekanbaru?

b. How is the students’ Reading Comprehension at the seventh grade

of Junior High School 14 pekanbaru?

c. Is there any significant relationship between students’ reading habit

and their reading comprehension at the seventh grade of Junior

High School 14 pekanbaru?

E. Objective and significance of the research

1. Objective of the research

a. To find out students’ reading habit at state Junior High School 14

pekanbaru.

b. To identify students’ reading comprehension at state Junior High

School 14 pekanbaru.

c. To identify significant correlation of students’ reading habit and

their reading comprehension.

2. Significance of the research

a. Theoritical Benefit

5
The result of this research hopefully can be used to improve

reading skill, especially on students’ reading habit and reading

comprehension.

b. Practical benefit

1. For students

- The result of this research hopefully can be used as a

starting point to develop students understanding about

reading habit and reading comprehension.

- The result of this research hopefully can be used to increase

students reading habit in reading English material.

- Student hopefully will have a greater habit to read English

text.

2. For teachers

- The result of this research hopefully can be used by the

teacher as a starting point to improve reading

comprehension

- The result of this research hopefully can be used by the

teachers as a starting point to improve students reading

comprehension.

3. For other researchers

- The result of this research can be a reference for another

researcher in conducting further research about relationship

between reading habit and reading comprehension at

different level of students.

6
F. Definition of the term

A. Correlation

According to Nunan (1992), correlation is a set of statistical

procedures for testing the strength or association between set scores.

Correlation is close to relationship or connection. In this research,

correlation is defined as the relationship between students’ reading

habit and reading comprehension.

B. Definition of Reading habit

According to Chettri and Rout (2013), habit is often considered in

term of amount of thing being done, the frequency of something that

we do as well as the average time spent on what we do. They also

stated that reading activity is regarded as a habit when it is repeatedly

carried out. When reading activity is carried out as regular activity by

the students, it will produce achievement of quality and their

education.

C. Definition of Reading Comprehension.

According to Chair (2002), Reading comprehension is the process

extracting and constructing meaning through interaction and

involvement with written language. In other words, reading

comprehension is the process that readers do in order to construct or

understand the meanings of the texts through reading activity.

D. Descriptive Text

According to Gerot (1994), Descriptive text is a text type that

describe a particular person, place or things.

7
G. Reasons for Choosing The Title

There are some reasons why the writer is interested in carrying out

this research:

1. The title of the research is relevant with the writer’s status as a student

of English Education Department.

2. The title of this research (the problem investigated in this research) has

not been investigated by other previous researcher.

3. The location of the research facilitates the writer in conducting the

research.

8
CHAPTER II

THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK

A. Reading Habit

Reading habits can be acquired by readers if they are frequently

read a book with any reasons that they have. When they get used to

read and search a book to read, reading can become their habit.

According to Grenne (2001,p.210) Reading habits can be achieved by

someone in younger age. If in young age, they formed reading habits it

will last long in their life. To form this reading habits is not simple as it

seems. Sometimes, some students or readers feelreading is a boring

activity. It happend because the first book that they read did not catch

their interest. It is important to reader to find a book that make them

interest in the content, so they will read and tend to finish it. If the

reader hooks into a book, they will try to find similar book or genre to

read and if it happens, reading will instantly become their habit.

In reading habits, frequency of reading or how many time students

read in one week is determined in their reading habits.Chettri and Rout

(2013,p.13) assert that reading habit is a reading activity which is done

recursively. In other words, based upon this view, reading can be

considered as a habit if it is done many times in a regular

way.Similarly, Iftanti (2012,p.154) also emphasizes that the key of

reading habit is repetition with respect to the desired reading behavior.

From this notion, reading habit is considered as the way in which

individuals repeat many times their reading activities so that it is

9
absorbed into themselves as an enjoyable activity which is done with

full of awareness or sincerely.

Meanwhile, Iftanti (2015,p.365) state that since a habit of reading

is established by repeating the desired behavior, reading is practiced

regularly every day until it becomes the second nature to the learners.

Therefore, repetition of reading activities is the key of the

establishment of reading habits. Accordingly, in this study, “good

reading habits in English” refers to “behaviors of reading various kinds

of English reading materials which are regularly, permanently and

intentionally conducted so it becomes a part of the EFL students’ daily

activities”.

1. Definition of Reading Habit

Per Nilsen (2012,p.3) defines habit as “habit is behavior that has

been repeated until it has become more less automatic, enacted without

purposeful thinking, largely without any sense of awareness”. According

to Benyamin Gardner (2012,p.32), habit is an abstract theory, in habit

theory there is no single correct definition. In habit people are repeated

action without concerning why this self concept must happen.

A psychologist, Wendy Wood (2007,p.47) state that habit as an

integrated association between stimulus and response, and that association

sets up with goals during learning and performance. Habitual manner often

goes unnoticed and unconscious and it follow trough the same repeated

action regularly. In the american journal of psychology, is more or less

10
fixed way of thinking, wiling, or feeling acquired through previous

repetition of mental experience. In term of habit, Meriam Webstern (2014)

dictionary also defines the word habit as follow: “An usual way of

behaving: something that person does often in a regular and repeated

way”. In other words habit is the process of behavior that goes

unconscious and become automatic that means that you are acquired habit.

For example, the habit looking both ways before crossing the street, it is

called habit.

According to Bashir Mattoo (2012,p.4) Behaviorist view habits as

routines of behavior that are repeated regularly and tend to occur

subconsciously. As a subconscious self concept, reading habits can help

students’ to gain academic achievement to a great extent. In term of

acquiring these habits of reading; they have to put these habits into

practice. Based on definitions above it can be said that as repeated actions,

habit involves a process of unconcious paattern. It reflects person’s

personality, good or bad, and they went constantly and regularly. Reading

habit will helps the learner obtaining and gaining a meaningful knowledge

and good academic performance in school.

2. The Purpose of Reading Habits


According to Ifshan Bashir (2007,p.2) There are some reading habits

purpose which have either positive or negative result. For purpose of

this topic, they are grouped into four segments they are ; hobbial,

recreational, concrentration, deviational.

11
a. Hobbial

A hobby is an activity that creates joy and satsfaction in doing it.

The purpose of reading habit as a hobby make a reader

knowledgeable in so many areas, such as in educational, political,

religious, an economic. This purposes of reading habit are not only

for pleasure but also positive. Unlike others hobbes, reading is one

the most recommended one to shape readers personality skill. By

reading book particularly it can develop the knowledge of

vocabulary which helps in conversations. Reading as a hobby is

wonderful; it helps the readers to improve their ability to absorb

and to comprehend written material and help them to pursue a

better job. In other word, the more the students have a good

reading habit, the more the students can do their job to

comprehend. Moreover, Patel and Jain (2008, p.114) say that

reading habits not only help the student to get knowledge and

wisdom from the cultural of heritage, but are also very helpful in

passing for leisure period.

b. Recreational

A good reading habit for recretional makes the reader acquire more

knowledge in the classroom. Reading for relaxation is aimed to

cool the reader’s brain and to avoid mental fatigue; the example

activities on reading for relaxation are reading newspaper and

magazine.

12
c. Concentration

One of the reading habit purposes is for concentration.

Concentration means that the readers acknowledge their reading

process to understand the meaning of passage. Reading for

concentration is recommended for use in school by stakeholders;

from the reading habit, we can see the positive result students in

the school.

d. Deviational

The last purpose of reading habit is deviational. This is only

reading habit which has a negative norm. The reader sometimes

pretends to read, and deviates from the actual reading. This should

be avoided by the students. If this reading habit attitude an

acquired by the student, it may lead to loss of interest in the

acquisition of knowledge.

3. The Aspect of Reading Habits

In gaining an effective reading habit, Julio Cesar (2011,p.59)

summarized six aspect of reading habit, they are: reading frquency,

books read, time spent on academic reading, time spent on non

academic reading, motivation in the family environments, motivation

in the academic environments.

1. Reading frequency

Reading frequency is used to measure students reading frequency

in their spare time.

13
2. Books read

The number of books that the students have read in the last three

months will be included in the questionnaires.

3. Time spent on Academic Reading

It is considered the time that the students devote time to read

academic book especially for their specialist subject.

4. Time spent on Non-Academic reading

It discusses the amount of the time that the students used to read

non academic book, magazine, such as novel, fiction, romance,

horror, etc.

5. Motivation in the family environment

It focuses on the recommended book that is purchased by the

family based on the interest of the family.

6. Motivation in the Academic Environment.

It focuses on the frequency of students’ reading literature in their

school environment based on the teacher report.

4. Advantages of Reading Habits

In habitual reading; there are so many advantages that the student

can absorb. According to Bashir Mattoo (2012,p.2) Reading habit is

the powerful and long lasting tool in the development of students’

academic succes. The implications of applying reading as habitual

acivity are students can expand the knowledge, and increase focus and

concentration. Reading as a habitual activity also helps the student to

14
pleasure their understanding, helps them become more intelligent, and

boost their vocabulary meaning.

Thanuskodi (2011,p.1) proposes several benefits of reading. He

said – the impact of reading in people’s live is extraordinarily

widespread. A reader can learn a new word, can be introduce to new

facts, new knowledgeabout the whole world and hestimulates to both

thought and emotion.

A more complete explanation stated by Steel jack (2008) . he

mentions several advantages of reading habit. They are: (1) habit of

reading helps the mind performs effectively, (2) habit of regular

reading helps us develop a good vocabulary. (3) habit of reading

reading means psychology activity. (5) Habitual reading helps readers

to have positive set of mind.

1. Habit of reading helps the mind performs effectively

To read frequently, people will have abilities to communicative

and think well. Acquiring reading habit will automatically active

neourons and make it always in a good shape. People who exhibit

habit of daily activity will help them perfom effectively in front of

public.

2. Habit of regular reading helps us develop a good vocabulary

Habitual reading develops their alertness in identifying error in a

sentence. The people who often read have much vocabulary. They

will have specific information about the meaning of the word

andthey are able to predict the meaning based on contect. They

15
also will be better in understading the message that the writer

trying to convey.

3. Habitual reading boosts intellectual curiousity.

Regular habit of reading exposes a reader to read a variety of a

book. Habitual reading also helps the readers to understand the

complexity of different books. A reader become knowledgeable

about various literacy skills and leads the reader to think

independently and critically.

4. Habitual reading means a psychological activity

Regular habit as a psychological activity means a reader links with

their mind to feel the writers’ imagination. The reader previews the

story and goes into it and absorbs as the story goes on. The reader

uses their mind to figure out the scheme of story, to feel the writers

feeling and to experience the differences of personal players.

5. Habitual reading helps readers to have a positive set of mind

Efficient frequent readers should be active, positive mind set and

critical. The reades should give feedback quickly to the material as

a respond to what they have read. They should also get the

summary and make aa critical judgment from the material.

To conclude, here are some important benefits for reading

habit activities. By implementing habitual reading, readers are able

to train their mind in the context of helping brain to work

effectively. Habitual reading enriches readers vocabulary in

various literalcy skills. The readers are also able to read critically,

16
effectively and positively. Morever, reading habit make the readers

open up their mind and helps them become more intelligent.

B. Reading Comprehension

1. The Nature of Reading Comprehension

According to Ralph (2009,p.36),Reading is defined as a

process of thinking which requires a response from the reader. It

may be through making generalization, drawing new inference and

planning succeeding steps based on what was read. Reading can be

seen as an interactive process between a reader and a text which

leads to automaticity or reading fluency. In this process, the reader

interacts dynamically with the text as he tries to elicit the meaning

and where various kinds of knowledge are being used: linguistic or

systemic knowledge (through bottom-up processing) as well as

schematic knowledge (through top-down processing).

Zint and Maggart in Ralph Blay (2009,p.6) defined

comprehension as the ability to build relevant ideas from

individual words to read in a particular context. The ability to

comprehend a text while the students are able to interpret the

experience related to new information to what is already known by

asking cognitive questions and being able to find answers to them;

a normal state, the absence of confusion.

Comprehension is multi components that involves many

interactions between reader and what they brings to the text, as

17
well as variable related to text itself. According to Jannette

(2007,p.2) reading comprehension is the process of constructing

meaning by coordinating a number of complex words, that whole

words is included in a sentence.

According to Richard (1997,p.443) reading comprehension

perceives a written text in order to understand the content. It is the

ability to find out the information presented in written form even

the information is explicity stated or not in passage. In reading

comprehension, the reader interact with the message in the text to

generate an understanding of writter’s message.

2. Purposes of Reading

Braten and Stromso (2007,p.168) said that the characteristic

of the efficient reader is he/she can extend the purpose of his/her

reading. The readers’ purpose actually plays an important role in

determining how the readers read a text. Some people might read

to get general idea (reading an essay, articles, chapters, etc); They

specify the information they can get from the source. The people

might also read to extract a spesific detail as in reading a phone

book, an instruction sign, and warning sign. Some other might read

for their happiness, such as in reading novel, short stories, etc.

Henry Guntur Tarigan (1995,p.9) mentions seven purposes

on reading, they are :

a. Reading for details and fact is reading to know what is done by

the subject of the story.

18
b. Reading for main ideas is reading to get the problem statement.

c. Reading for sequences of organization is reading to know each

part of the story.

d. Reading for inference is reading to know what is the writer

mean by its story.

e. Reading for classifying is reading to find unusual things.

f. Reading for evaluating is reading to know the value of the

story.

g. Reading for comparing is reading to compare the way of life of

the story with the life of reader.

3. Factor Influencing Students’ Reading Comprehension

Reading comprehension refers to the ability of a reader to construct

meaning from the text. Expected levels of reading comprehension

vary throughout a reader’s lifespan.

The factors of students’ reading comprehension are:

a. Decoding and word recognition speed.

According to Anderson, Hiebert, Scott, & Wilkinson

(1985,p.46) Decoding refers to the reader’s ability to make

sense of letter sound relationships, including proper word

pronunciation and noticing common letter combinations, in

order to quickly recognize familiar words. Readers who

experience difficult with decoding and recognizing words read

at a much slower pace and find it more difficult to comprehend

19
the meaning of reading passages than the peers without

decoding difficulties.

b. Vocabulary

Vocabulary breadth can also have an impact on reading

comprehension. According to Oulette (2006,p.66) Readers use

decoding skills to figure out the pronunciation and approximate

meaning of words they haven’t seen before, but this process

takes far more time than recognition of familiar word.

Individuals with a wider vocabulary can interpret the meaning

of reading passages faster and more thoroughly than

individuals who must guess at the meanings of unfamiliar

words based on context clues.

c. Attention and motivation

The reader’s attention and motivation are integral to reading

comprehension. According to Dornyei (2001,p.9) the meaning

of motivation is so complicated because it is composed of

different models and theories. Teachers can supply an exciting

and relaxed environment to increase their learners’ reading

comprehension. By using various genres, they are able to make

a more attractive atmosphere for students. In fact the teachers

are as models and motivators.

d. The quality of reading material

The quality of writing can also affect reading comprehension.

Text that is poorly organized and difficult to understand can

20
slow reading speed and significantly hinder reading

comprehension. According to Denish (2008,p.41) Poor quality

writing may slow decoding speed, as well as syntactic

recognition and sentence comprehension. Poor quality reading

material can also cause readers to lose motivation while

reading, which negatively affects the reader’s comprehension

of the text.

4. Levels of Reading Comprehension

Three levels of reading comprehension are mentioned by Arthur

Heilman (1981,p.246), They are literal comprehension, inferential

comprehension, and critical comprehension.

a. Literal Comprehension

Literal Comprehension refers to information explicitly stated in

the written text. As a basic level, the readers are needed the

abilities to understand meaning of words before recognizing

details message, then the readers are required to link the

grammar theories with the main ideas presented in the passage.

In the last step in literal comprehension, the readers are needed

to sequence all the information stated in the passage.

b. Inferential Comprehension

The inferential comprehension is the process how a readers

derives an implicit idea in the passage. The reader needs the

abilities to detect mood of the material such as the authors’

21
tone, purpose and attitude, to make generalization, to see the

relationship, and to draw conclusion in the end of a story. A

reader is requuired to think harder when applying this

comprehension level.

c. Critical Comprehension

Critical comprehension is a higher thinking level of reading.

The reader should be actively reacting to the information

presented by the authors. The reader are needed the ability to

analyze the information and link those information to their

background knowledge. Further, the readers evaluate the value

of its information and give personal judgements as a feedback

to the author.

5. Strategies of Reading

There are so many strategies in reading techniques. Grellet

(1999,p.4) proposes the wayof reading; he defines the strategies of

reading into several points. They are skimming, scanning, intensive

and extensive.

a. Skimming

In skimming, readers are reading rapidly over a text in order to

get main point. In other word, skimming is a process of over

viewing the general concept of the material; it can be started

by selecting sub chapter move to larger content material.

Skimming permits reader to preview the next to get the scheme

22
of a text not to read word by word. For example reading news

paper, people dismiss unimportant material and quickly

identify main idea. People usually do skimming in a multiple

speed because of limited time.

b. Scanning

Scanning is quickly scanning through a text to find a spesific

words, numbers and steps. The concept of scanning can be

defined in this way, in scanning the eye glances over the

materia aimed to find spesific information. In other words,

scanning means readers search through the material for a

spesific purpose, e.g finding the answer to question, and

seeking words in dictionary or prices in a catalogue.

c. Intensive

Intensive seems to be stigmatized by some researcher as a

boring style of reading, because the readers need to find the

details of the information required. Intensive reading usually

read at the slower speed; the aim of scanning is to read shorter

texts and to extract spesific information.

d. Extensive

Extensive reading is to read a longer passage, the aim of

extensive reading usually for one’s enjoyment. This extensive

reading also called as a fluency activity and it includes an

overall meaning from the passage. Extensive reading means to

read abundantly and fluently. The purpose of this strategy is for

23
pleasure and the primary goal in extensive reading is reading

books after books e.g reading novel, short stories, and article.

6. The Component of Reading Comprehension

According to Malsi (2012,p.76), There are five components that

may help the students to read carefully.

a. Find factual information

Factual information requires readers to scan specific details.

The types question of factual information such as question type

of reason, purpose, result, comparison, identity, time, and a

mount in which most of the answer can be found in the text.

b. Main Idea

It is a statement that tells the author’s point about the topic. The

main idea provides the message of a given paragraph or the

argument that is being made about the topic.

c. Reference

In English, as in other language it would be clumsy and boring

to repeat the same word of phrase every time it has a reader

uses it. Instead of repeating the same word or phrase several

time it has been used, we usually refer to it rather than repeat it.

References words are usually short and are frequently

pronouns, such as it, she, it’s, those, and so on.

d. Inference

The important thing is needed in reading is understanding.

Write use language efficiently and recognize what can be

24
inferred from their sentence. In this case, an efficient reader is

able to understand those implications.

C. Descriptive Text

Descriptive text is a text which says what a person or a

thing is like. Its purpose is to describe and reveal a particular

person, place, or thing. Anderson (1998,p.7) defines descriptive

text as painting pictures with words. By reading adescriptive text,

readers feel that they see the description just like they see pictures.

Descriptive text has the purpose to describe an object or a person

that the writer is interested in.

Descriptive texts include an introduction followed by an

ordered outline of the features of the thing being described and

there may be evaluative comment throughout. Hogins in Sherly

Deswita (1975,p.235) Purpose a descriptive text is essentially a

description that classifies and describes things in general and

specific terms. Descriptive texts draw attention to the

characteristics of a particular thing

Gerot and Peter (1994,p.208) mention that descriptive text

has two parts of generic structure. First is the identification which

is the introductory statement introducing general classification of

the things being described. The second is the description. This part

describes the description of the general classification mentioned

before.

25
Gerot and Peter (1994,p.210) also state there are three

language features used in descriptive text. First is the use of

attributive and identifying process. Second is the use of adjective

and classifiers in nominal group. Last is the use of simple present

tense.

The example of descriptive text.

Identification Barong dance drama is one of the most popular


dances in Bali.

The dance enacts a battle between good and evil.


Description The dancers appeal to the spirit world during
performance. The barong dance-drama is believed
to exorcise evil spirits from the village. The barong
dance-drama depict a struggle between the witch
rangda and the barong, a mythical and benevolent
beast.

(adapted from English Learning Handout by M Mursyid

2011,p.7)

D. Relevant Research

Some investigations were conduted by researchers dealing with

reading. First, The research was administered by Riva Irmawati(2015)

entitled The Correlation between Curiousity and Reading

Comprehension in Learning English at MTS Darul Hikmah

Pekanbaru. She concludedthat there is significance correlation

between the students' curiosity and their reading comprehension in

learning English at the second year student of MTs Darul Hikmah

26
Pekanbaru. Because after analyzed the data in the previous chapter, the

writer found that whether in level significance 5% and 1% the rch is

higher than rtable. It was calculated that 0. 361< 0.789 > 0.463, that is

way alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and hypothesis (Ho) is

rejected.

The similarities of this research and my research are the variable of

both researcher are similar. And this research used Test to measure

Students’ Reading Comprehension and also used descriptive

quantitative reseach as a research design.

The differences between our research are the researcher do not

investigated students’ reading habit. But, Riva’s research used simple

random sampling to collected the data, while the researcher use cluster

random sampling to collect the data.

The second research deals with the correlation research by Zehra

Kartal (2011). She conducted The Relationship between Students’

Reading Habit and Their Writing ability of SMA Pribadi Depok. She

concluded that reading habit has high influence on students’ writing

ability. It can be stated that student who has good reading habit has

good writing skill too: whereas, the student who has poor reading habit

tends to have poor writing ability in term of narrative text. It is proven

by the Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient result which 58

the score is 0.610 which is higher than r table value ( = 0.610> ( ) =

0.304 and = 0.610> ( ) = 0.393). Furthermore, reading habit has

37.21% contribution in the students’ narrative writing ability.

27
The similarities of the researcher as this research is they have same

of variable X, our variable X is reading habit. And this research also

used questionnaire tu measure students reading habit and descriptive

quantitative reseach as a research design.

The differences among them is in the variable Y. The research of

Zehra does not investigated about reading comprehension. The

research Zehra used random sampling technique to collected the data

of the students.

E. Operational Concept

According to Syafi’i (2011), operational concepts are derived from

related theoretical concepts on all of the variables that should be

practically and empirically operated in a research paper. It means that

it is used to give explanation about theoretical framework in order to

avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation on the research.

The operational concept is a concept as a guidance uses to avoid

misunderstanding. It should be interpreted into particular words in

order to make it easy to measure. In this operational concept, the writer

would like explain briefly about variables of the research itself. There

are two variables uses. The first is about student’s reading habits in

which is known as independent variable or variable X; the second is

students’ Reading comprehension which is known as dependent

variable or variable Y.

According to Julio Cesar (2011) “X” variable can be seen in the

following indicators:

28
1. The amount of reading books that the students do.

2. The students read academic readings books

3. The students read book frequently

4. The students read non academic reading books

5. The students get motivated in reading from family environment

6. The students get motivated in reading from academic environment

While the indicators of variable Y (reading comprehension)

According to Malsi (2012) and based on English Subject syllabus on 2013

curriculum, the indicators to define students’ reading comprehension can

be drawn as follow :

1. Students are able to determine the communicative purpose of

the text.

2. Students are able to identify the generic structures of the text.

3. Students are able to determine the factual information from the

text.

4. Students are able to determine the main idea of the text.

5. Students are able to determine the reference of the text.

6. The students are able to determine the inference of the text.

F. Assumption and Hypothesis

1. Assumption

a. The students have different reading habit

b. The students have different reading comprehension

29
c. The higher students’ reading habit, the higher students’ reading

comprehension and The lower students’ reading habit, the lower

student’s reading comprehension.

2. Hypothesis

a. Alternative hypothesis

There is significant relationship between reading habit and their

reading comprehension at the seventh grade of junior high

school 14 pekanbaru.

b. Null hypothesis

There is no significant relationship between reading habit and

their reading comprehension at the seventh grade of junior high

school 14 pekanbaru.

30
CHAPTER III

Method of the Research

A. Method of the research

This research is a correlational research. This research consists of

two variables independent (X) and dependent (Y). This research tries to

investigate the relationship between students’ Reading Habit and Their

Reading Comprehension at the Seventh Grade of Junior High School 14

Pekanbaru. There are two variables in this research, independent and

dependent variable. Students’ Reading Habit is as independent variable

and Reading Comprehension is as the dependent variable.

In conducting the research, the writer prepared a questionnaire to

measure the students reading habit as “X” and Test to find out the reading

comprehension that symbolized as “Y” variable.

B. Time and Location of this research

This research was conducted at state Junior High School 14 Pekanbaru

located which is on Hangtuah street. This research was conducted March

2019.

C. Subject and Object of this research

The subject of this research is the seventh grade students of Junior High

School 14 Pekanbaru. The subject is 1 class that consist of 35 students.

The Object of this research is the relationship between reading habits and

their Reading Comprehension at First year of Junior High School 14

Pekanbaru.

31
D. Population and Sample of this research

1. Population

The population of this research was the seventh grade students of Junior

High School 14 Pekanbaru. The total number of population was 280

students divided into eight classes.

Table III.1
The Total Population of Seventh Grade Students of Junior High
School 14 Pekanbaru

NO Class Number of
the students

1 VII.1 35

2 VII.2 35

3 VII.3 35

4 VII.4 35

5 VII.5 35

6 VII.6 35

7 VII.7 35

8 VII.8 35

TOTAL 280

2. Sample

The population of this research is 280 students. According to

Suharsimi Arikunto (2006) if the total population is less than 100, it is

better to take all of them as the sample but if the total populations are

more than 100 students. The sample can be taken between 10-15 % or

32
20-25%. Because the population is too large, the writer will take 20%

of the population as the sample. So, the researcher will take 56

students as the sample of the research.

To take the ones who will be the sample, the research will use

simple random sampling. According to Fraenkel, wallen and Hyun

(2012,p.43), if the population is large, simple random sampling is best

to obtain a sample representative of the population of interest. In line

with this statement, Sugiyono (2013) adds random sampling can be

used if the number of population is assumed homogenous.

In addition, to choose the selected ones which will be the sample

from each class, the researcher will use lottery technique, where the

one who gets the piece of paper containing number will be the sample.

E. Data Collection Technique

In order to get data for this research, the writer applied the technique as

follow:

1. Questinonnaire

In this research, the writer distributes the questionnaires to the

students aim at knowing their reading habit score. Before giving the

questionnaire to the students, According to Siregar (2014,p.10),

questionnaire is technique of collecting information to learn person’s

attitude, beliefs, habits, behaviours and characteristics toward certain

object. The scale of measurement for attitude is likert scale, in which

students will be asked to choose one of the responses ( strongly agree ,

agree , neither, disagree , strongly disagree. As stated by Siregar

33
(2014,p.13) likert scale used to measure attitude, opinion and

perception of individual or group of individual about social

phenomena.

In conclusion, to measure student’s reading habit, the simple way

to is use questionnaire, which uses likert scale because it deals with

student’s habit and their preference among activities, hobby or other

aspects.

The questionnaire is formulated from to several indicators from

julio cesar’s theory about reading habit aspects they are: reading

amount of books, academic reading, reading frequency, nonacademic

reading, motivation in the academic environment, and motivation in

the family environment. The following table present the indicator used

by the writer in questionnaire:

Table III.2

Reading Habit Indicators

No Reading habit (X) Indicators Item Number

1 Reading amount of book 1,2,3,4

2 Academic reading 5,6,7,8

3 Reading frequency 9,10,11,12

4 Non academic reading 13,14,15,16

5 Motivation in the academic 17,18,19


environment
6 Motivation in the family 20,21,22,23
environment
Total 23

34
Table III.3

Score of Reading Habits Questionaire

Scale Score

Strongly Agree (sangat setuju) 5

Agree (setuju) 4

Neither (tidak juga) 3

Disagree (tidak setuju) 2

Strongly Disagree (sangat tidak 1


setuju)

2. Test

This technique is use to find out the students’ score in reading

comprehension. According to Brown (2003,p.3), test is method of

measuring a person’s ability, knowledge, or performance in a given

domain. So, the researcher will use the reading test to purpose to

pinpoit strength and weakness students’ reading comprehension. The

researcher will make 25 questions, so the students should answer the

entire questions

Table III.4
Reading Comprehension Indicator
No Reading Comprehension (Y) Item Numbers
Indicators

Students are able to determine the 1,7,13,19,25


1 communicative purpose of the text.
Students are able to identify the 2,8,14,20,26
2 generic structure of the text.

35
Students are able to determine the 3,9,15,21,27
3 factual information from the text.
Students are able to determine the 4,10,16,22,28
4 main idea of the text.
Students are able to determine the 5,11,17,23,29
5 reference of the text.
The students are able to determine the 6,12,18,24,30
6 inference of the text.
Total 30

After the students do the test, the researcher then takes total score from

the result of reading test. The classification of the students’ score is as

follows (Arikunto, 2011)

Table III.5
The Classification of Students’ Score
Score Category

Very Good
80-100
Good
66-79
Enough
56-65
Less
40-55
Fail
30-39

F. Data Analysis Technique

In this research, the writer conducted used questionnaire to score students

reading habit. Then, the writter conducted test to measure their reading

comprehension score. The independent variable of this research is the

students’ reading habit (variable X) and the students Reading

36
Comprehension is the dependent variable (Y). According to Hartono

(2012, p.77), to analyze the relationship between students reading habit

and their reading comprehension, the researcher will use product moment.

He said this technique can be used if the data is continue, homogenous,

and linear regression. In order to get easy in analyzing the data, the

rearcher will use SPSS 21 Program.

G. Validity and Reliability

1. Validity

Cresswell (2011) stated that validity is the individual’s score from an

instrument that make sense, meaningful; enable you, as the researcher,

to draw conclusion from the sample you are studying to the population.

It means that validity is the extent to which inference made from

assessment results are appropriate, meaningful, and useful in the terms

of the purpose of the assessment.

a. Validity of Questionnaire

In this research, the researcher used constructed validity.

Siregar (2013) described that construct validity means the validity

that relates to the ability of instrument which is used to measure

psychological construct such us intelligence, motivation, anxiety,

and critical thinking as in this research.

To analyze the validity of the questionnaire, the researcher

conducted a try out to 30 items by handing them to 28 students who

are not included in the research sample. The researcher used SPSS

37
21.0 program to analyze the data. The researcher compared r value to

rt at significant level of 5% is 0.222 (d=N-2=28). The r value of each

item should be higher than the rt to be considered as a valid question.

If the value of r on the analysis of less than r table, it can be

concluded that these items are not significantly correlated with the

total score (declared invalid) and must be removed or corrected.

The result of the analysis showed that there were 24 questions

accepted or valid and the others were rejected or invalid, 24

statements are valid and the rest are dropped. The dropped items are

statement number 19. These items were dropped because the scores

are under 0.222. Thus, there are 42 items of questionnaire used to

test students’ critical thinking disposition.

Table III.6
Validity of Reading Habit Questionnaire

Item No R. Value T. Table Status


Statement 1 ,358 0,222 Valid
Statement 2 ,682 0,222 Valid
Statement 3 ,719 0,222 Valid
Statement 4 ,374 0,222 Valid
Statement 5 ,533 0,222 Valid
Statement 6 ,454 0,222 Valid
Statement 7 ,568 0,222 Valid
Statement 8 ,541 0,222 Valid
Statement 9 ,761 0,222 Valid
Statement 10 ,436 0,222 Valid
Statement 11 ,384 0,222 Valid
Statement 12 ,635 0,222 Valid
Statement 13 ,306 0,222 Valid
Statement 14 ,737 0,222 Valid
Statement 15 ,403 0,222 Valid
Statement 16 ,517 0,222 Valid
Statement 17 ,477 0,222 Valid
Statement 18 ,286 0,222 Valid
Statement 19 ,202 0,222 Invalid
Statement 20 ,761 0,222 Valid

38
Statement 21 ,393 0,222 Valid
Statement 22 ,676 0,222 Valid
Statement 23 ,457 0,222 Valid
Statement 24 ,541 0,222 Valid

b. Validity of Reading Comprehension Test

To analyze the validity of the reading comprehension test,

the researcher conducted a try out to 30 items by handing them to

28 students who are not included in the research sample. The

researcher used SPSS 21.0 program to analyze the data. The

researcher compared r value to rt at significant level of 5% is 0.222

(df=N-2=28). The r value of each item should be higher than the rt

to be considered as a valid question. If the value of r on the

analysis of less than r table, it can be concluded that these items are

not significantly correlated with the total score (declared invalid)

and must be removed or corrected.

The result of the analysis showed that there were 25

questions accepted or valid and the others were rejected or invalid,

25 questions are valid and the rest are dropped. The dropped items

are statement number 11,12,18,24,30. These items were dropped

because the scores are under 0.222. Thus, there are 24 items of

questionnaire used to test students’ critical thinking disposition.

39
Table III.7

Validity of Reading Comprehension Test

Item no R.Value T.Table Status

Question1 ,409 0,222 Valid

Question2 ,669 0,222 Valid

Question3 ,501 0,222 Valid

Question4 ,473 0,222 Valid

Question5 ,769 0,222 Valid

Question6 ,499 0,222 Valid

Question7 ,769 0,222 Valid

Question8 ,398 0,222 Valid

Question9 ,419 0,222 Valid

Question10 ,587 0,222 Valid

Question11 ,202 0,222 Invalid

Question12 ,221 0,222 Invalid

Question13 ,369 0,222 Valid

Question14 ,473 0,222 Valid

Question15 ,741 0,222 Valid

Question16 ,327 0,222 Valid

Question17 ,587 0,222 Valid

Question18 ,161 0,222 Invalid

Question19 ,387 0,222 Valid

Question20 ,419 0,222 Valid

Question21 ,594 0,222 Valid

40
Question22 ,411 0,222 Valid

Question23 ,562 0,222 Valid

Question24 ,176 0,222 Invalid

Question25 ,398 0,222 Valid

Question26 ,473 0,222 Valid

Question27 ,587 0,222 Valid

Question28 ,419 0,222 Valid

Question29 ,669 0,222 Valid

Question30 ,161 0,222 Invalid

2. Reliability

Reliability has to do with accuracy of measurement. This kind of

accuracy was reflected in obtaining the similar results when

measurement was repeated on different or by different person. The

characteristic of reliability is sometimes termed consistency (Brown,

2003). And this research is internal consistency reliability. According

to Crasswell (2012), internal consistency reliability is the instrument

administered once; using one version of the instrument. The table

below is the categories of reliability test used in determining the level

of reliability of the test.

The level of Acceptable Reliability

No Reliability Validity

1 >0.90 Very High

2 0.80-0.90 High

41
3 0.70-0.79 Reliable

4 0.60-0.69 Marginally/Minimally

5 <0.60 Unacceptable low

(Cohen,Manion,&Morison,2007, p.506)

a. Reliability of Reading Habit

To obtain the reliability of the reading comprehension test,

the researcher used SPSS 21.0 Program to find out whether the

questionnaire was reliable or not.

The Reliability Statistic of the Reading Habit Questionnaire

Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items


,912 24
From the table above, it can be seen the value of

Cronbach’s alpha is 0.912. The value is higher than the standard

Cronbach’s alpha which is 0.60. Therefore, it can be concluded the

questionnaire is reliable, and the level of reliability is very high.

b. Reliability of Reading Comprehension

To obtain the reliability of the reading comprehension test,

the researcher used SPSS 21.0 Program to find out whether the

questionnaire was reliable or not.

Reliability Statistic of Reading Comprehension Test

Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items


,881 30
From the table above, it can be seen the value of

Cronbach’s alpha is 0.881. The value is higher than the standard

42
Cronbach’s alpha which is 0.60. Therefore, it can be concluded the

test is reliable, and the level of reliability is high.

H. Technique of Data Analysis

For the technique of data analysis, the researcher applied a

quantitative analysis. According to Nunan (2002), quantitative research

describes a research problem through a description of trends or a need for

an explanation of the relationship among variables by collecting numeric

data from a large number of people using instruments with preset

questions and responses.

The researcher used some techniques to answer the research

questions as follows:

1. To analyze the data of the students’ critical thinking, the researcher

used following formula based on (Ridhuan , 2011, p.40)

𝑓
P = 𝑁 × 100%

Where:
P=Number of Percentage
F=Frequency
N=Number of Sample

Riduwan (2011, p.41) indicated the scale to classify the gained

percentage of questionnaire as follows:

No Percentage Category Level

1 81%-100% Very High

2 61%-80% High

3 41%-60% High Enough

43
4 21%-40% Low

5 0%-20% Very Low

2. For the data of reading comprehension, the score was scored by using

following formula:

Where :

∑x = Total of students score


N = Total of students

Classification for students’ reading comprehension can be seen below:


The Scale of the Students’ Reading Comprehension
No Score Category

1 80-100 Very Good

2 66-79 Good

3 56-65 Enough

4 40-55 Less

5 30-39 Fail

Adopted from (Arikunto,2013,p.281, Dasar dasar Evaluasi


Pendidikan)
3. To analyze the correlation between students’ critical thinking and their

reading comprehension of analytical exposition, the researcher used

pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r) by SPSS 21.0

program for windows. The product moment correlation coefficient was

obtained by considering the degree of freedom (df) = N-nr, ( N=

44
number of sample, nr = number of variable) Statistically, the

hypotheses are:

Ha: ro > rt = If ro value is higher that rt, Ha is accepted. It means

that there is a correlation between students’ critical thinking

disposition and reading comprehension of analytical exposition.

Ho : ro < rt = if ro value is higher that rt, Ha is accepted. It means

that there is no correlation between students’ critical thinking

disposition and reading comprehension of analytical exposition.

Then, the strength of correlation is interpreted based on coefficient

correlation in the table below:

The Interpretation of Correlation Coefficient

r =.10 to .29 or r = –.10 to –.29 Small

r =.30 to .49 or r = –.30 to –.4.9 Medium

r =.50 to 1.0 or r = –.50 to –1.0 Large

Adopted from (Pallant,2005,p.126)

45
CHAPTER IV

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

A. Data Presentation

There were two instrument used in this research. They were a

questionnaire and a test. The questionnaire was used to measure the

reading habit of the students (x variable), and the test was used to measure

the reading comprehension of the students (y variable).

1. Data Presentation of Students’ Reading Habit

In collecting the data of students’ critical thinking, the researcher used

questionnaire. The items of the questionnaire were constructed based

on indicators of critical thinking by Fecione (2000), that have been

widely used to measure critical thinking disposition. The total number

of the items of the questionnaire was 42. The result of the analysis of

each item of the questionnaire is as follows:

Table IV.1
I read many books of various genre in 3 months
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Neither 44 78,6%
Disagree 12 21,4%
Strongly disagree 0 0
Total 56 100%
Table IV.1 shows that from 56 respondent, 78,6% answered “neither”, 21,4% of

respondents answered “disagree”. And there is no respondent answered “strongly

disagree, agree, and strongly disagree “.

46
Table IV.2
I read Science, Technology, Mathematics and other literature
because I like to discover new things
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 7 12,5%
Agree 17 30,4%
Neither 25 44,6%
Disagree 7 12,5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 12,5% answered “strongly agree”,

32,1% of respondents answered “agree”, 44,6% of respondents answered

“neither”, 10,7% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table VI.3
Thickness, Font size, Illustrations and etc greatly influence the reading that I
choose
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 7 12,5%
Agree 19 33,9%
Neither 19 33,9%
disagree 11 19,6%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.3 shows that from 56 respondent, 14,3% answered “strongly agree”,

33,9% of respondents answered “agree”, 32,1% of respondents answered

“neither”, 19,6% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.4
I like to read books when I'm free
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 4 7,1%
Agree 22 39,3%
neither 26 46,4%
disagree 4 7,1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%

47
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 12,5% answered “strongly agree”,

41,1% of respondents answered “agree”, 41,1% of respondents answered

“neither”, 5,4% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.5
I underlined the important things in the textbook when I read
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 12 21,4%
Agree 19 33,9%
neither 19 33,9%
disagree 6 10,7%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.5 shows that from 56 respondent, 25,0% answered “strongly agree”,

35,7% of respondents answered “agree”, 30,4% of respondents answered

“neither”, 8,9% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.6
I noted when the teacher was explaining the contents of the
textbook
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 10 17,9%
Agree 19 33,9%
neither 25 44,6%
disagree 2 3,6%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.6 shows that from 56 respondent, 23,2% answered “strongly agree”,

33,9% of respondents answered “agree”, 39,3% of respondents answered

“neither”, 3,6% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

48
Table IV.7
I wrote again the text notes in my own language
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 2 3,6%
Agree 20 35,7%
neither 31 55,4%
disagree 3 5,4%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 7,1% answered “strongly agree”,

39,3% of respondents answered “agree”, 48,2% of respondents answered

“neither”, 5,4% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.8
I like to read related sources before the lesson starts
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 3 5,4%
Agree 15 26,8%
neither 30 53,6%
disagree 8 12,5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 36 100%
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 5,4% answered “strongly agree”,

28,6% of respondents answered “agree”, 53,6% of respondents answered

“neither”, 12,5% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.9
every night I study regularly for at least 1 hour
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 7 12,1%
agree 15 26,8%
neither 25 44,6%
disagree 9 16,1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%

49
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 14,3% answered “strongly agree”,

28,6% of respondents answered “agree”, 44,6% of respondents answered

“neither”, 12,5% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.10
I read in the same times and the same place
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 7 12,5%
agree 16 28,6%
neither 28 50,0%
disagree 5 8,9%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.10 shows that from 56 respondent, 12,5% answered “strongly agree”,

26,8% of respondents answered “agree”, 55,4% of respondents answered

“neither”, 5,4% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.11
I read in the quite place and no interference
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 12 21,4%
agree 21 37,5%
neither 16 28,6%
disagree 7 12,5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.11 shows that from 56 respondent, 28,6% answered “strongly agree”,

41,1% of respondents answered “agree”, 25,0% of respondents answered

“neither”, 5,4% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

50
Table IV.12
I makes some questions for checking my understanding
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 3 5,4%
agree 17 30,4%
neither 26 46,4%
disagree 10 17,9%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.12 shows that from 56 respondent, 8,9% answered “strongly agree”,

26,8% of respondents answered “agree”, 48,2% of respondents answered

“neither”, 16,1% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.13
I read and connected the new information with my understanding
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 7 12,5%
Agree 25 44,6%
Neither 19 33,9%
Disagree 5 8,9%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.13 shows that from 56 respondent, 10,7% answered “strongly agree”,

46,4% of respondents answered “agree”, 37,5% of respondents answered

“neither”, 5,4% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.14
I transleted the main idea with my own words
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 11 19,6%
agree 14 25,0%
neither 23 41,1%
disagree 8 14,3%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%

51
Table IV.14 shows that from 56 respondent, 17,9% answered “strongly agree”,

25,0% of respondents answered “agree”, 48,2% of respondents answered

“neither”, 8,9% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.15
I read and compare the information from the one novel and others
novel.
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 2 3,6%
agree 15 26,8%
neither 23 41,1%
disagree 16 28,6%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Table IV.15 shows that from 56 respondent, 1,8% answered “strongly agree”,

21,4% of respondents answered “agree”, 51,8% of respondents answered

“neither”, 25,0% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.16
I prepared the stationary before I read
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 13 23,2%
agree 22 39,3%
neither 14 25,0%
disagree 7 12,5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Table IV.16 shows that from 56 respondent, 28,6% answered “strongly agree”,

44,6% of respondents answered “agree”, 17,9% of respondents answered

“neither”, 8,9% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

52
Table IV.17
I am one of the children who likes to read in my family
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 6 10,7%
agree 13 23,2%
neither 28 50,0%
disagree 8 14,3%
Strongly disagree 1 1,8%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.17 shows that from 56 respondent, 7,1% answered “strongly agree”,

19,6% of respondents answered “agree”, 58,9% of respondents answered

“neither”, 12,5% of respondents answered “disagree”, and 1,8 answered “strongly

disagree”.

Table IV.18
family encouraged me to read rather than have to play in my spare
time
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 10 17,9%
agree 30 53,6%
neither 14 25,0%
disagree 2 3,6%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 19,6% answered “strongly agree”,

55,4% of respondents answered “agree”, 23,2% of respondents answered

“neither”, 1,8% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.19
I felt calm in the test because I was used to reading at home
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 2 3,6%
agree 23 41,1%
neither 23 41,1%
disagree 8 3,6%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%

53
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 1,8% answered “strongly agree”,

42,9% of respondents answered “agree”, 46,4% of respondents answered

“neither”, 8,9% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.20
I read for my academic succes
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 20 35,7%
agree 19 33,9%
neither 17 30,4%
disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.2 shows that from 56 respondent, 44,6% answered “strongly agree”,

33,9% of respondents answered “agree”, 21,4% of respondents answered

“neither”. And there is no respondent answered “disagree and strongly disagree“.

Table IV.21
I read a lot to increase my knowledge
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 16 28,6%
agree 25 44,6%
neither 11 19,6%
disagree 4 7,1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.21 shows that from 56 respondent, 41,1% answered “strongly agree”,

44,6% of respondents answered “agree”, 12,5% of respondents answered

“neither”, 1,8% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.22
I read to get a good score
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 17 30,4%
agree 20 35,7%
neither 16 28,6%

54
disagree 3 5,4%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.22 shows that from 56 respondent, 41,4% answered “strongly agree”,

35,7% of respondents answered “agree”, 21,4% of respondents answered

“neither”, 1,8% of respondents answered “disagree” . And there is no respondent

answered “strongly disagree“.

Table IV.23
I read because of my own desire
No Alternative F P
Strongly agree 20 35,7%
agree 29 51,8%
neither 7 12,5%
disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 56 100%
Table IV.23 shows that from 56 respondent, 17,9% answered “strongly agree”,

46,4% of respondents answered “agree”, 35,7% of respondents answered

“neither”. And there is no respondent answered “disagree and strongly disagree“.

Students Reading Habit Score

No Student No Score
1 Student1 81
2 Student2 75
3 Student3 54
4 Student4 65
5 Student5 75
6 Student6 54
7 Student7 67
8 Student8 55
9 Student9 65
10 Student10 70
11 Student11 75
12 Student12 65
13 Student13 78
14 Student14 66
15 Student15 72
16 Student16 70
17 Student17 70
18 Student18 68

55
19 Student19 77
20 Student20 67
21 Student21 71
22 Student22 67
23 Student23 65
24 Student24 55
25 Student25 62
26 Student26 80
27 Student27 78
28 Student28 73
29 Student29 70
30 Student30 71
31 Student31 67
32 Student32 70
33 Student33 66
34 Student34 70
35 Student35 70
36 Student36 71
37 Student37 68
38 Student38 71
39 Student39 71
40 Student40 77
41 Student41 73
42 Student42 76
43 Student43 71
44 Student44 73
45 Student45 70
46 Student46 71
47 Student47 72
48 Student48 71
49 Student49 65
50 Student50 76
51 Student51 85
52 Student52 87
53 Student53 77
54 Student54 76
55 Student55 72
56 Student56 75
Total 3952
Mean 70,6

To make it clear, the researcher makes up the interval score distribution of

the students’ critical thinking score. To find the interval, the researcher computed

the range of score. Then, the range was divided by class interval.

56
The following chart is the data of interval score distribution of critical

thinking

25

20

15

10

0
54-58 59-63 64-68 69-73 74-78 79-83 84-88

It can be seen, at interval score of 54-58, there is 4 student. At interval

score of 59-63, there are 1 students. At interval score of 64-68, there are 13

students. At interval score of 69-73, there are 22 students. At interval score of 74-

78, there are 12 students. At the interval score of 79-83, there are 2 students. And

at the interval 84-88, there is 2 student.

Meanwhile, below the researcher present the percentage of the students’

interval score distribution.

The Percentage of the Interval Score Distribution of the Students’ Reading Habit

It can be seen, at interval score of 61-64, there are 2% percent. At the

interval score of 65-68, there are 21%. At the interval score of 69-72, there are

34%. At the interval score of 73-76, there are 30%, at the interval of 77-80, there

57
are 9%. At the interval score of 81-84, there are 4%, and at the interval score of

85-88, there are 4%.

The Percentage of Interval Score Distribution of Students’ Reading Habit

54-58 59-63 64-68 69-73 74-78 79-83 84-88

4% 4%
2%
7%

21%
23%

39%

2. Data Presentation of Students’ Reading Comprehension

In collecting the data of students’ reading comprehension, the

researcher took from the result of the students’ test. It can be seen in

following table.

No No respondent Score
1 Students1 96
2 Students2 80
3 Students3 64
4 Students4 72
5 Students5 88
6 Students6 48
7 Students7 72
8 Students8 48
9 Students9 56
10 Students10 80
11 Students11 68
12 Students12 52
13 Students13 80

58
14 Students14 64
15 Students15 72
16 Students16 60
17 Students17 80
18 Students18 80
19 Students19 64
20 Students20 76
21 Students21 76
22 Students22 64
23 Students23 68
24 Students24 64
25 Students25 84
26 Students26 72
27 Students27 88
28 Students 28 84
29 Students29 80
30 Students30 64
31 Students31 86
32 Students32 72
33 Students33 76
34 Students34 76
35 Students35 72
36 Students36 80
37 Students37 80
38 Students38 72
39 Students39 76
40 Students40 72
41 Students41 80
42 Students42 72
43 Students43 72
44 Students44 80
45 Students45 80
46 Students46 76
47 Students47 80
48 Students48 76
49 Students49 76
50 Students50 68
51 Students51 72
52 Students52 76
53 Students53 68
54 Students54 80
55 Students55 76
56 Students56 84

Total 4122
Mean 73,6

59
The Frequency of Students Reading Comprehension

25

20

15

10

0
48-54 55-61 62-68 69-75 76-82 83-89 90-96

It can be seen, at interval score of 48-54, there are 3 students. At interval

score of 55-61, there are 2 students. At interval score of 62-68, there are 11

students. At interval score of 69-75, there are 11 students. At interval score of 76-

82, there are 23 students. At the interval score of 83-89, there are 5 students. At the

interval score of 90-96, there are 1 students.

The Percentage of the Interval Score Distribution of the Students’ Reading


Comprehension

48-54 55-61 62-68 69-75 76-82 83-89 90-96

2% 5%
3%
9%

20%

41%
20%

It can be seen, at interval score of 48-54, there are 5% percent. At

the interval score of 55-61, there are 3%. At the interval score of 62-68,

60
there are 20%. At the interval score of 69-75, there are 11%, at the interval

of 76-82, there are 48%. At the interval score of 83-89, there are 11%. And

at the interval score of 90-96, there are 2%.

3. Data Presentation of Students’ Reading Habit and Reading

Comprehension

No Students no Score

Reading habit Reading


comprehension
1 Students 1 81 96
2 Students 2 75 80
3 Students 3 54 64
4 Students 4 65 72
5 Students 5 75 88
6 Students 6 54 48
7 Students 7 67 72
8 Students 8 55 48
9 Students 9 65 56
10 Students 10 70 80
11 Students 11 75 68
12 Students 12 65 52
13 Students 13 78 80
14 Students 14 66 64
15 Students 15 72 72
16 Students 16 70 60
17 Students 17 70 80
18 Students 18 68 80
19 Students 19 77 64
20 Students 20 67 76
21 Students 21 71 76
22 Students 22 67 64
23 Students 23 65 68
24 Students 24 55 64
25 Students 25 62 84
26 Students 26 80 72
27 Students 27 78 88
28 Students 28 73 84
29 Students 29 70 80
30 Students 30 71 64
31 Students 31 67 86
32 Students 32 70 72
33 Students 33 66 76

61
34 Students 34 70 76
35 Students 35 70 72
36 Students 36 71 80
37 Students 37 68 80
38 Students 38 71 72
39 Students 39 71 76
40 Students 40 77 72
41 Students 41 73 80
42 Students 42 76 72
43 Students 43 71 72
44 Students 44 73 80
45 Students 45 70 80
46 Students 46 71 76
47 Students 47 72 80
48 Students 48 71 76
49 Students 49 65 76
50 Students 50 76 68
51 Students 51 85 72
52 Students 52 87 76
53 Students 53 77 68
54 Students 54 76 80
55 Students 55 72 76
56 Students 56 75 84
Total 3952 4122
Mean 70,6 73,6

4. Normality Test

The normality test was used to know whether the distribution of

the data was normal or not. Then, the researcher used SPSS 21.0 for

normality test. The following table shows the normality test result for

variable X (students’ reading habit) and variable y (students’ reading

comprehension)

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Reading Reading
habit Comprehension

62
N 56 56

Normal Mean 70,59 73,29


a,b
Parameters
Std. Deviation 6,752 9,376

Most Extreme Absolute ,144 ,160


Differences
Positive ,078 ,130

Negative -,144 -,160

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1,076 1,195

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,197 ,115

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

For normality test, if the significance level (Asymp. Sig) is bigger

than 0.05, the data distribution is normal. For the table above, it can be

seen that the asymp significant value for reading habit ,197. And the

asymp significant value for reading comprehensin is 0.564. So, it can be

concluded that both data distribution are normal. Therefore, the analysis

of correlation for critical thinking and students’ reading comprehension

could be continued.

5. Linearity Test

The linearity test is used to know if there is significant linearity

relationship between two variables. In this case, the researcher used

SPSS 21.0 for linearity test. In the following table, the linearity test

result between students’ critical thinking and their reading

comprehension is shown.

63
ANOVA Table

Sum of df Mean F Sig.


Squares Square

Reading Between (Combined) 3191,200 18 177,289 3,990 ,000


Comprehension * Groups
Linearity 1334,899 1 1334,899 30,03 ,000
Reading habit
9

Deviation 1856,301 17 109,194 2,457 ,011


from Linearity

Within Groups 1644,229 37 44,439

Total 4835,429 55

The table above shows the significance level ,011 which higher

than 0.05. It means, there is a linear relationship between students’ reading

habit and their reading comprehension.

64
B. Data Analysis

1. Reading Habit of the Students

The Recapitulation of Reading Habit Questionnaire

No Alternatives
Item Strongly Strongly
Agree Agree Neither Disagree Disagree Total
F % F % F % F % F % N %
1 0 0 12 21 44 79 0 0 0 0 56 100
2 7 13 17 30 25 45 7 13 0 0 56 100
3 7 13 19 34 19 34 11 20 0 0 56 100
4 4 7 22 39 26 46 4 7 0 0 56 100
5 12 21 19 34 19 34 6 11 0 0 56 100
6 10 18 19 34 25 45 2 4 0 0 56 100
7 2 4 20 36 31 55 3 5 0 0 56 100
8 3 5 15 27 30 54 8 14 0 0 56 100
9 7 13 15 27 25 45 9 16 0 0 56 100
10 7 13 16 29 28 50 5 9 0 0 56 100
11 12 21 21 38 16 29 7 13 0 0 56 100
12 3 5 17 30 26 46 10 18 0 0 56 100
13 7 13 25 45 19 34 5 9 0 0 56 100
14 11 20 14 25 23 41 8 14 0 0 56 100
15 2 4 15 27 23 41 16 29 0 0 56 100
16 13 23 22 39 14 25 7 13 0 0 56 100
17 6 11 13 23 28 50 8 14 1 2 56 100
18 10 18 30 54 14 25 2 4 0 0 56 100
19 2 4 23 41 23 41 8 14 0 0 56 100
20 20 36 19 34 17 30 0 0 0 0 56 100
21 16 29 25 45 11 20 4 7 0 0 56 100
22 17 30 20 36 16 29 3 5 0 0 56 100
23 7 13 29 52 20 36 0 0 0 0 56 100
185 447 522 133 1
Table IV.50 above shows the score recapitulation of Critical Thinking

questionnaire. Obtained total frequency from each alternative multiplied by

standard-score from each option of alternatives. The result acquired can be

seen as follows:

65
Total frequency of strongly agree alternative 5 X 185 = 925

Total frequency of agree alternative 4 X 447 = 1788

Total frequency of indifferent alternative 3 X 522 = 1566

Total frequency of disagree alternative 2 X 133 = 266

Total frequency of strongly disagree alternative 1X 1 = 1

Total score = 4546

The ideal total score of the whole items should be 5 x 23 x 56 = 6440 (

If all respondents answer strongly agree). However, the total score acquired is

4776. In order to find out how is students’ reading habit, (Ridhuan, 2011, p.40)

pointed out the formula to analyze the percentage of the data as follows
𝐹
𝑃= × 100%
𝑁

4546
𝑃= × 100%
6440

𝑃 = 70,59%

Based on the category provided on chapter III, according to

Riduwan (2011, p.41), it can be concluded that the reading habit of the

seventg grade students at state junior high school 14 was high because the

percentage obtained was 70.59%. Thus, the first research problem which

was formulated and had been current issue in the school recently was

answered.

66
2. Reading Comprehension of the students

For analyzing data of students’ reading comprehension, the researcher

obtained the further analysis description by using SPSS 21.0 It can be

seen from the following table.

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Sum Mean Std. Variance


Deviation

Reading Comprehension 56 48 96 4104 73,29 9,376 87,917

Valid N (listwise) 56

From the table it can be seen that the mean of students’ reading

comprehension is 73.29, it means that the category for students’ reading

Comprehension is enough. Next, the variance is 87.917, the standard

deviation is 9.376, minimum score is 48, and maximum score is 96.

3. Data Analysis of the Correlation between Students’ Reading Habit

and Their Reading Comprehension

The Relationship between Students’ Reading Habit and Their Reading


Comprehension at State Junior High School 14 Pekanbaru

Reading Reading
Comprehensi
habit
on

Reading habit Pearson Correlation 1 ,525**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 56 56

Reading Comprehension Pearson Correlation ,525** 1

67
Sig. (2-tailed) ,000

N 56 56

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Pearson correlation was conducted in this research in order to determine

any significant correlation between the students’ reading habit and their

reading comprehension at state junior high school 14 Pekanbaru. Based on

Pearson analysis for students’ reading habit and their reading comprehension

on table above, it was found that the Ro is ,525. This value is higher than the

rtable stated in the Pearson’s r correlation 0.222 (Ro>Rt). Then, the alternative

hypothesis is accepted, meaning that there is a correlation between reading

habit and reading comprehension. The result showed that the scores

significantly correlate between reading habit and reading comprehension at

state junior high school 14 Pekanbaru.

In addition, the table above also showed that the coefficient correlation in

this research is ,525. Furthermore, there is also the symbol *. It is clear that

there is a positive correlation between reading habit and reading

comprehension. Meanwhile, in order to know the level or strength of

correlation between two variables, (Pallant, 2005, p.126) provides the

following categories:

The Interpretation of Correlation Coefficient

r =.10 to .29 or r = –.10 to –.29 Small

r =.30 to .49 or r = –.30 to –.4.9 Medium

r =.50 to 1.0 or r = –.50 to –1.0 Large

68
The correlation coefficient obtained was ,525 which means the level of

correlation between reading habit and reading comprehension of the seventh

grade students at State Junior High 14 School Pekanbaru was medium. Thus

the third research problem which was formulated and had been current issue in

the school recently was answered.

Furthermore, the R determination should be found in order to find out

how significant the correlation between reading habit and reading

comprehension of the seventh grade students at State Junior High School 14

Pekanbaru. According to Riduwan (2011), determinant coefficient is the value

that is used to know the contribution given by variable X to variable Y. The

following is the process of getting the R determinant:

R = (r)2 x100%

R = (,525)2 x 100%

= 28%

Eventually, the R determinant obtained was 28%. It means that 28%

reading comprehension of the seventh grade students at State Junior High

School 14 Pekanbaru influenced reading habit. Then, the other 72% was

influenced by other factors.

69
Reading habit Other factor

28%

72%

In conclusion, there is correlation between students’ reading habit and

their reading comprehension at the seventh grade of State Junior High School

14 Pekanbaru. 28 % of students’ reading comprehension at eleventh grade of

State Senior High School 2 Mandau was influenced by Reading Habit.

categorized into low level.

70
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

This research was conducted to find out whether there is a

significant correlation between reading habit and reading comprehension

of seventh grade at state junior high school 14 Pekanbaru or not. Based on

what has been discussed, presented and analyzed in the previous chapters,

the researcher concluded that:

1. The percentage score of students’ reading habit at seventh grade of

State Jenior High School 14 Pekanbaru is 75.80%. It is categorized as

“High” level.

2. The mean score of students’ reading comprehension at eleventh grade

of State Senior High School 2 Mandau is 63.5. it is categorized as

“Enough” level

3. There is a correlation between students’ critical thinking and their

reading comprehension of analytical exposition at eleventh grade of

state senior high, at the “Medium” level (0.391). It can be said that

critical thinking has a contribution on students’ reading

comprehension of analytical exposition. 15.28 % of students’ reading

comprehension was influenced by their critical thinking.

71
BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, M. (1998). Text Type in English 3. South Yarra: Macmilan Education


Australia.
Anderson, Hiebert, Scott. (1984). The Report of the Comission on Reading .
Washington DC: The National Academy of Education.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT.
Rineka Cipta.
Bamberger, Richard. (1975). Promoting the reading habits. France: The Unesco
Press.
B T Fidzani., O. O. (1998). Fidzani B. T. and OladoLibrary service and support
to affiliated Institutions survey. Gaborone: University of Bostwana.
Bashir Ifhsan., M. N. (2007). A Study on Study Habits and Academic
Performance among Adolescents (14—19) Years. International Journal
of Social Science Tomorrow , 4-6.
Bashir, I. M. (2012). A Study on Study Habits and Academic Performance
Among Adolescents (14-19) years. International Journal of Social Science
Tomorrow , 43.
Braten., I. B. (2013). Multiple documents literacy. Oxford Bibliographies in
Education. New York: Oxford Univ , 168.
Brown, H. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom . New York:
Pearson Education Inc.
Caesar, Julio. (2011). Relationship between reading habits. University library and
academic performance in a Sample of psychology students. University
library and academic performance in a Sample of Revista de La Education
superior Journal. Vol. XL (1), No.157 , 59.
Chair, S. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in
Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
Chettry, K. (2013). Reading Habit: an overview. IOSR Journal Of Ilumanties and
Social Science, 13.
Creswel, J. W. (2008). Educational Research; Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating, Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey:
Pearson Education International.
Dennis, D. V. (2008). Are Assessment Data Really Driving Middle School
Reading Instruction, What we can learn from one student’s experience.
Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy , 41.

72
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. The Electronic Journal
for English as a Second Language , 9.
Fidzani, B T (1998). Library Service and Support to Affiliated Institutions
Survery. University of Bostwana, Gaborone, Unpublished report.
Fraenkel, J. W. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New
York: McGraw-Hil.
Gardner, Benyamin. (2012). Habit as automaticity not frequency. Journal of the
European Health Psychologist , 32.
Gerot, L., &. W. (1994). Making Sense of Functiona; Grammar. Australia.: Gerd
Stabler.
Grellet, F. (1999). Grellet,Developing Reading Skills A practical Guide to
Reading Comprehension Exercise. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Hammer. (2003). The Effect of Motivations, Family Environment, and Students
Characteristics on Academic Achievement. Journal of Instructional
Psychlogy , 43.
Heilman, W. Arthur. e. (1981). Principle and Practices of Teaching Reading Fifth
Edition. Colombus: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
Hartono. (2012). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.

Iftanti, E. (2012). A survey of the english reading habits Of efl students in


indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 23, Number 2 , 160.
Iftanti, E. (2015). What makes EFL Students Establish Good Reeading Habits in
English. International Journal of Education and Research , 365.
J.D. Greene, R. S. (2001). J.D. Greene, R.B Sommerville, L.E. Nystrom,J.M.An
fmri invetigation of emotional engament in moral judgment. Science ,
210.
Jack, S. (2008). The Habit of Reading And Its Advantages-Why You Should
Develops Habit of Regular Reading. 31.
Jack C. Richards., &. R. (1997). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied
Linguistic. London: Pearson Education.
Klingner, Jannete. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with
Learning Difficulties. Newyork: A Division of Guilford Publication.
Murphy, A Richard. (1997). From Practice of Performance: Reading English
Language Programs Division USA Information Agency.
Mursyid, M. (2011). English Learning Handout; Learning Descriptive Text. SMP
1 Karangdadap.

73
Ms. Kushmeeta Chettri., D. S. (2013). Reading Habits - An Overview. IOSR
Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) , 13.
Nilsen, P. (2012). Creature of habit: Accounting for the role of Habit in
Implementation Researchon Clinical Behavior Change. Implementation
Science Journal 9 , 3.
Nunan, D. (1992). Language Teaching Methodology: a text book for teacher.
New York: Prentice Hall.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). OueWhat’s meaning got to do with it: The role of
vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of
Educational Psychology 98 , 66.
Patel, M. &. (2008). English Language Teaching. Jaipur: Sunrise.

Ralph Blay., K. A. (2009). The Relationship between Motivation and Second


Language Reading Comprehension among Fourth Grade Filipino Students
5. The philippine ESL Journal 5, volume 2 , 6.
Sherly Deswita., &. M. (2014). Teaching Writing A Descriptive Text By Using
The Bio-Poems Strategy to Junior High School Students. E - JOurnal
UNP JELT Vol. 2 No. 2 Serie C , 235.
Siregar, S. (2014). Statistik Parametrik Untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanti, Malsi. (2012). The Effect of Using PACER Strategies on students’
Reading Comprehension of the Second Year at SMA N 1 Lipat Kain
Kampar Kiri District of KamparRegency. Pekanbaru. 76.
Syafi’i, M. (2011). From Paragraphs to a Research Report a Writing of English f
or Academic Purposes. Pekanbaru: Suska Press.
Tarigan, H. G. (1995). Membaca Sebagai Suatu Ketrampilan Berbahasa.
Bandung: Angkasa Bandung.
Thanuskodi, S. (2011). Reading Habit Among Library and Information Science
Students. Reading Habit Among Library and Information International
Journal Education Science , 1.
Webster, Merriam. (2014). An Encyclopedia Britannica Company Dictionary.
(http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/habit).
Wahyudi, Agus. (2016). The Correlation Between Reading Habit and Reading
Comprehension Achievement of 12th Grade Students of MA. PP
Qodratullah Langkan. Proceedings of the 2nd SULE – IC 2016, FKIP,
Unsri, Palembang, 117.

74
Wood, Wendi. &. (2007). A New Look at Habits and the Habit-Goal Interface
Psychological Review. A New Look at Habits and the American
Psychological Journal Association , 47.
Zwiers, J. (2004). Building Reading Comprehension Habits in Grades 6-12.
Sanfransisco: CA: International Reading Association.

75

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen