Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
3) What is a Hypothesis?
Ans Imagine you have a test at school tomorrow. You stay out late and see a movie with friends.
You know that when you study the night before, you get good grades. What do you think will
happen on tomorrow's test?
When you answered this question, you formed a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a specific,
testable prediction. It describes in concrete terms what you expect will happen in a certain
circumstance. Your hypothesis may have been, 'If not studying lowers test performance and I do
not study, then I will get a low grade on the test.'
4) Explain graphic rating scale?
Ans Graphic Rating Scale is a type of performance appraisal method. In this method traits or behaviours
that are important for effective performance are listed out and each employee is rated against these traits.
The rating helps employers to quantify the behaviours displayed by its employees.
5) What is ANOVA?
Ans ANOVA is a statistical technique that assesses potential differences in a scale-level dependent
variable by a nominal-level variable having 2 or more categories. For example, an ANOVA can examine
potential differences in IQ scores by Country (US vs. Canada vs. Italy vs. Spain). The ANOVA,
developed by Ronald Fisher in 1918, extends the t and the z test which have the problem of only allowing
the nominal level variable to have two categories. This test is also called the Fisher analysis of variance.
Q.3 Explain the research process in detail.
Dissertation markers expect the explanation of research process to be included in Methodology chapter. A
typical research process comprises the following stages:
1. Selecting the research area. You are expected to state that you have selected the research area due to
professional and personal interests in the area and this statement must be true. The importance of this first
stage in the research process is often underestimated by many students. 2. Formulating research aim,
objectives and research questions or developing hypotheses. The choice between the formulation of
research questions and the development of hypotheses depends on your research approach as it is
discussed further below in more details. Appropriate research aims and objectives or hypotheses usually
result from several attempts and revisions and these need to be mentioned in Methodology chapter
3. Conducting the literature review. Literature review is usually the longest stage in the research
process. Actually, the literature review starts even before the formulation of research aims and objective;
because you have to check if exactly the same research problem has been addressed before
4. Selecting methods of data collection. Data collection method(s) need to be selected on the basis of
critically analyzing advantages and disadvantages associated with several alternative data collection
methods
5. Collecting the primary data. Primary data collection needs to be preceded by a great level of
preparation and pilot data collection may be required in case of questionnaires. Primary data collection is
not a compulsory stage for all dissertations and you will skip this stage if you are conducting a desk-based
research.
6. Data analysis. Analysis of data plays an important role in the achievement of research aim and
objectives. Data analysis methods vary between secondary and primary studies, as well as, between
qualitative and quantitative studies.
7. Reaching conclusions. Conclusions relate to the level of achievement of research aims and objectives.
In this final part of your dissertation you will have to justify why you think that research aims and
objectives have been achieved
8. Completing the research. Following all of the stages described above, and organizing separate
chapters into one file leads to the completion of the first draft. The first draft of your dissertation needs to
be prepared at least one month before the submission deadline.
Q.4 Explain the significance of a research report and narrate the various steps involved read and writing
such a report.
Research reports are the product of slow, painstaking, accurate inductive work. The usual steps involved
Though all these steps are self explanatory, yet a brief mention of each one of these will be appropriate
Logical analysis of the subject matter: It is the first step which is primarily concerned with the
The logical development is made on the basis of mental connections and associations between the one
thing and another by means of analysis. Logical treatment often consists in developing the material from
the simple possible to the most complex structures. next step in writing the research report “Outlines are
the framework upon which long written works are constructed. They are an aid to the logical organization
Preparation of the rough draft: This follows the logical analysis of the subject and the preparation of the
final outline. Such a step is of utmost importance for the researcher now sits to write down what he has
done in the context of his research study. He will write down the procedure adopted by him in collecting
the material for his study along with various limitations faced by him, the technique of analysis adopted
by him, the broad findings and generalizations and the various suggestions he wants to offer regarding the
problem concerned.
Rewriting and polishing of the rough draft: This step happens to be most difficult part of all formal
writing. Usually this step requires more time than the writing of the rough draft. The careful revision
makes the difference between a mediocre and a good piece of writing. While rewriting and polishing, one
should check the report for weaknesses in logical development or presentation. The researcher should also
“see whether or not the material, as it is presented, has unity and cohesion; does the report stand upright
and firm and exhibit a definite pattern, like a marble arch? Or does it resemble an old wall of moldering
Preparation of the final bibliography: Next in order comes the task of the preparation of the final
bibliography. The bibliography, which is generally appended to the research report, is a list of books in
some way pertinent to the research which has been done. It should contain all those works which the
researcher has consulted. The bibliography should be arranged alphabetically and may be divided into
two parts; the first part may contain the names of books and pamphlets, and the second part may contain
the names of magazine and newspaper articles. The entries in bibliography should be made adopting the
following order:
Writing the final draft: This constitutes the last step. The final draft should be written in a concise and
objective style and in simple language, avoiding vague expressions such as “it seems”, “there may be”,
and the like ones. While writing the final draft, the researcher must avoid abstract terminology and
technical jargon. Illustrations and examples based on common experiences must be incorporated in the
final draft as they happen to be most effective in communicating the research findings to others.
Internal Assignment No. 2
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Paper Code: MBA - 206
Paper Title: Research Methodology For Management Decision
Type I Errors
The first type is called a type I error. This type of error happens when you say that the null hypothesis is false when it is
actually true. Our null hypothesis is the hypothesis for our expected outcome. If our null hypothesis is that dogs live
longer than cats, it would be like saying dogs don't live longer than cats, when in fact, they do. To help you remember this
type I error, think of it as having just one wrong. You are wrongly thinking that the null hypothesis is false. In statistics,
we label the probability of making this kind of error with this symbol:
It is called alpha. This is a value that you decide on. Usually, it is 0.05, which means that you are okay with a 5% chance
of making a type I error. The lower the alpha number, the lower the risk of you making such an error. The tricky part with
setting the alpha number is that if you set it too low, it may mean that you won't catch the really small differences that may
be there.
Type II Errors
The other type of error is called a type II error. This type of error happens when you say that the null hypothesis is true
when it is actually false. For our null hypothesis that dogs live longer than cats, it would be like saying that dogs do live
longer than cats, when in fact, they don't. To help you remember a type II error, think of two wrongs. You are wrongly
thinking that the null hypothesis is wrong. The probability of making a type II error is labeled with a beta symbol like this:
This type of error can be decreased by making sure that your sample size, the number of test subjects you have, is large
enough so that real differences can be spotted. So for the dogs and cats, this would mean that you need to gather data about
enough dogs and cats to see a real difference between them.
Q.4 What do you mean by "Sample Design", What points should be taken into consideration by
research in developing a sample design for the research project.
Ans Sampling is a means of selecting a subset of units from a target population for the purpose
of collecting information. This information is used to draw inferences about the population as a
w hole. The subset of units that are selected is called a sample. The sample design
encompasses all aspects of how to group units on the frame, determine the sample size,
allocate the sample to the various classifications of frame units, and finally, select the sample.
Choices in sample design are influenced by many factors, including the desired level of
precision and detail of the information to be produced, the availability of appropriate sampling
frames, the availability of suitable auxiliary variables for stratification and sample selection, the
estimation methods that w ill be used and the available budget in terms of time and resources.
1. Time. A causal relationship, by its very nature, implies that some time has elapsed
betweenthe occurrence of the cause and the consequent effect. While f or some phenomena
thee lapsed time might be measured in microseconds and therefore might be unnoticeable to a
casual observer, we normally assume that the causeand effect in social sciencearenas do not
occur simultaneously, In design notation we indicatethis temporal element horizontally -
whatever symbol is used to indicatethe presumed causewould be placed to the left of the
symbol indicating measurement of the effect. Thus, as we read f rom left to right in design
notation we are reading across time. Complex designs might involvea lengthy sequence of
observations and programs or treatments across time.
2. Program(s) or Treatment(s). The presumed cause may be a program or treatment under the
explicit control of the researcher or theoccurrence of some natural event or program not
explicitly controlled. In design notationwe usually depict a presumed cause with the symbol "X".
When multiple programs or treatments are being studied using the same design, we can keep
the programs distinct by using subscripts suchas "X1" or "X2". For a comparison group(i.e., one
which does not receive the program under study) no "X" is used.
3. Observation(s) or Measure(s). Measurements are typically depicted in design notationwith
the symbol "O". If the same measurement or observation is taken at every point in time in a
design, thenthis "O" will be sufficient. Similarly, if the sameset of measures is givenat every
point in time in this study , the "O" can be used to depict the entire set of measures. However, if
different measures are given at different times it is useful to subscript the "O" to indicate which
measurement is being given at whichpoint in time.
4. Groups or Individuals. The final design element consists of the intact groups or theindividuals
who participate in various conditions. Typically, there will be one or more program and
comparison groups. In design notation, each groupis indicated on a separate line. Furthermore,
the manner in which groups are assigned to the conditions can be indicated by an appropriate
symbolat the beginning of eachline. Here, "R" will represent a groupwhich was randomly
assigned, "N" will depict a group which was nonrandomly assigned (i.e., a nonequivalent group
or cohort) and a "C" will indicatethat the group was assigned using a cutoff score on a
measurement