Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract:This Paper deals with a smoothdc motor starter using Eb=Back EMF
dc/dc buck-boost converter simulated using Matlab -
SIMULINK. This type of converter is mainly used to regulate Ia= Armature current
the desired output voltage level and maintain dc motor speed Ra = Armature resistance
constant. The dc motor widely uses high precision digital I=Supply current
controllers. Thedc motor is a self-starting motor, having
various starting methods. The main limitation of 4-point starter If = Field winding current
is that it has no control on the high speed of the motor. The
field current automatically reduces to zero due to which the After applying KVL in source armature loop, ithave these
field winding of the motor gets opened under running equations:
condition, thus resulting in more power loss in the external V= +𝐼 𝑅 (1)
resistance of the four point starter. These limitations are 𝑉−
overcome by the present research work. The obtained results 𝐼 = 𝑅𝑎
(2)
show that the starting current of dc shunt motor has been
controlled with in the desired limit.
and back EMF,
Keywords : Smooth Starter, Buck-Boost Converter, dc motor.
𝑁𝑃𝜙
= (3)
6
I. INTRODUCTION
Eq.3 shows that back emf depends on the speed and flux of
Thedc shunt motor is a self-starting motor. So that there is dc motor. But at starting, speed and flux of dc motor is very
no need of starter. But several devices are used for starting low. At the starting of dc motor, flux is due to residual flux
ofdc shunt motor like 3-point starter or 4-point starter [1]. hence starting back emf is approximately zero or negligible.
But question arises that if dc shunt motor is self-starting then As result, armature current will be:
why we are using these several devices for starting of dc
shunt motor [2]. 𝑉
The investigators tried to find answer to this question with 𝐼 = (4)
𝑅𝑎
the help of mathematical expressions for the dc shunt motor.
These mathematical expressions are written on base of Fig.1 As the value of armature resistance is of the range of 0.5Ω to
3Ω (very low), the starting current is very high which can
damage the winding of motor. So there is a need to reduce
the value of starting current.
2
Fig. 7Buck-Boost converter: boundary of continuous discontinuous
conduction
Now, using Fig.7
𝐼 = 𝑖 , 𝑘 (12)
𝑇𝑉
𝐼 = (13)
Since Inductor voltage over one cycle of time period is Zero. 𝐼 =𝐼 − (15)
,𝑚 𝑥
𝑉 𝑇 + −𝑉 − 𝑇 = 8)
𝐼 =𝐼 ,𝑚 𝑥 − (16)
𝑉0
𝑉
= (9) Now, duty cycle D is function found as
−
𝑉 2 𝐼
In the discontinuous conduction mode current through the =𝑉 √ (17)
𝐼 𝐵, 𝑎
inductor goes to zero before switching time. Hence the
inductor will totally discharge. Fig.6 show voltage waveform The parameters like L and C for buck-boost converter can be
drop across inductor in discontinuous mode. determined with the help of the following equations:
𝑉 ∗ 𝑉𝑖 𝑎 −𝑉
𝐿= (18)
𝑖 𝑉𝑖 𝑎 𝐼
Capacitor (C)calculation:
𝑖 𝐼
= (19)
8 𝑉 𝑖
where:
Fig.6Discontinuous mode voltage Fsw = converterswitching frequency; Voutripple = output
voltage ripple; Iout = maximum output current; Kind=
Integrating Inductor voltage over complete cycle of time estimated coefficient that represents the amount of inductor
period yields to Zero [18]. ripple current relative to the maximum output current.
𝑉 𝑇 + −𝑉 𝛥 𝑇 + 𝛥 𝑇 = 10)
The buck boost converter in its basic form is capable of
𝑉0 transferring energy only in one direction. This converter has
= (11) following advantage; it gives higher output voltage, Low
𝑉 ∆
operating duty cycle, Low voltage drop across MOSFETs
[19].
Now, determine boundary condition between continuous and
discontinuous mode.
V. SIMULATED MODEL
3
The starters hold on coil is connected directly across the
source voltage through a resistance R. The four point starter
does not provide protection to the motor in high speed
running condition as field gets opened.The starter reduces
the starting current by introducing a high resistance in series
with motor for controlling armature current. Fig.9 shows
SIMULINK diagram of dc shunt motor starting with four
point starters. During the starting, resistance is connected in
series with armature of dc shunt motor. Same data sheet is
used which is given in dc shunt motor without starter [22].
Now in case of dc shunt motor starting with four –point
starter, mathematical equation is following:
V. SIMULATION RESULT
5
c) DC Shunt Motor with Buck- Boost Converter
This simulation result shows the current variation during
starting and operating condition of machine. The Fig.17
shows the simulation result of armature winding current. The
satrting armature current is controllable as shown in Fig. 17
from 0.02Second to 0.4 Second, operating cuurent from 0.4
sceond to 0.6 second is control by varying the duty cycle of
converters. The field current and speed are also controllable
by varying the duty cycle as shown in Fig.18 and Fig.19
respectively.
6
mathematical and simulink model results has been
successfully achieved. The obtained results have shown that
there is no ohmic loss in the starting device under starting as
well as running mode of operation in addition to the
variation in speed and torque.
REFERENCES
[1] R.Rajeswari, S.Ravi, Vitaliy Mezhuyev, Kumarakrishnan
“MATLAB/Simulink Based Design and Development of a
Buck Boost Converter as a Smooth Starter for dc Motor
Control” in 2015 International Conference on Soft-Computing
and Network Security (ICSNS -2015), Coimbatore, India.Feb.
25 – 27, 2015.
[2] M. A. Ahmad, R. M. T. Raja Ismail, and M. S. Ramli,
“Controlstrategy of buck converter driven dc motor: a
comparative assessment,”Australian Journal of Basic and
Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 10, PP.4893–4903, 2010.
[3] Rohit Kumar, “3- Coil Starter use for Starting dc Motor” in
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering &
Technology (IJSRET), ISSN: 2278–0882EATHD-2015
Conference Proceeding, 14-15 March, 2015.
[4] S.M.Girirajkumar,Atal.A.Kumar, N.Anantharaman“Speed
Control of a Real Time D.C. Shunt MotorUsing SA Based
Tuning of a PID Controller”in International Journal of
Fig.19Simulation result of current variation in field
starting and operating condition.
Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)Vol 5– No.11, August
2010.
[5] S. E. Lyshevski, Electromechanical Systems, Electric
VI. RESULT COMPARISION Machines, andApplied Mechatronics. Florida: CRC Press,
Table 2 shows the performance of conventional method, proposed
1999.
methods of loss occur at starting and operating condition is illustrated. [6] J.Linares Flores, J.L.Barahona Avalos, H. Sira Ramirez and
M.A.Contreras-Ordaz, “Robust passivity-based control of a
Starting Armature Field Current Power Loss In Buck Boost converter/ DC-motor system: An active
Method Current (Ia) (If ) Starter(Whr) disturbance rejection approach”, IEEE Transaction on Industry
Starting Operating Applications, Vol.48, No.6, PP.2362-2371, 2012.
Loss Loss [7] J. Linares Flores and H.Sira Ramirez, “A smooth starter for a
Without
dc machine. A flatness based approach,” in Proc. 1st
Starter 92.9 0.8531 0 0 International Conference on Electrical and Electronics
Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, PP. 589–594, Sep. 8– 10,
Four 2004.
Point 19.02 0.8531 120.587 33.93
[8] J. Linares Flores and H. Sira Ramirez, “Sliding mode-delta
Starter
modulation GPI control of a DC motor through a buck
Power converter,” in Proc. 2nd IFAC Symposium on System,
Electronics 15.36 0.84 0 0 Structure and Control, Oaxaca, Mexico, PP. 405–409, Dec. 8–
Starter 10, 2004.
[9] J. Linares Flores and H. Sira Ramırez, “DC motor velocity
control through a DC-to-DC power converter”, in Proc. IEEE
The presents result (i.e., without starter,four point starter and 43rd Conf. Decis. Control, Atlantis, the Bahamas,Vol. 5, PP.
power electronics starter ) obtained by armature current is 5297– 5302, Dec. 14–17, 2004.
92.9A in without starter, power loss in starting 120.587Whr [10] R. Silva-Ortigoza, G. Silva-Ortigoza, V. M. Hernandez-
and operating condition 33.93 Whr occur in four point Guzman, V. R. Barrientos-Sotelo, J. M. Albarran-Jimenez, and
V. M. Silva- Garcıa, “Trajectory tracking in a mobile robot
starter.
without using velocity measurements for control of
The proposed work has low starting current with negligible wheels”,IEEE Latin Am. Trans., Vol. 6, No. 7, PP. 598–607,
switch loss of both buck –boost converter. Dec. 2008.
[11] R. Silva-Ortigoza, M. Marcelino-Aranda, G. Silva-Ortigoza,
VII. CONCLUSION V. M Hernandez-Guzman, M. A. Molina-Vilchis, G. Saldana-
This paper introduce to a smooth starter for dc shunt motor Gonzalez, J. C. Herrera-Lozada, and M. Olguın-Carbajal,
“Wheeled mobile robots: A review,” IEEE Latin Am. Trans.,
and study shows that, the power electronic starting method is
vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2209–2217, Dec. 2012.
better than four point starter. Advantages of considering [12] R. Silva-Ortigoza, C. Marquez-Sanchez, M. Marcelino-
these starters for dc shunt motor are that, it provide smooth Aranda, M. Marciano-Melchor, G. Silva-Ortigoza, R.
starting of motor, by varying the duty cycle of both buck Bautista-Quintero, E. R. Ramos-Silvestre, J. C. Rivera-Diaz,
boost converters speed control of dc motor is also possible, and D. Munoz-Carrillo, “Construction of a WMR for
require comparatively less maintenance and no power loss trajectory tracking control: experimental results”,Vol. 2013,
PP. 1–17, 2013.
occurs due to absence of starting resistance. If considering
7
[13] Z. Chen, W. Gao, J. Hu, and X. Ye, “Closed-loop analysis and [19] Aadesh Kumar Arya , Rajeev Kumar, Anurag Choudhary
cascade control of a non-minimum phase Boost converter”, “Simulation Solar Power Plant Artificial Intelligence Based
IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics., Vol. 26, No. 4, PP. Using Matlab/Simulink”,International Conference on
1237–1252, Apr. 2011. Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology, IETET,
[14] Z. Chen, W. Gao, and X. Ye, “Frequency domain closed-loop Grenze ID:02.IETET-2016.
analysis and sliding mode control of a non-minimum phase [20] Dr. Akhilendra Yadav, Anuj Kumar Palariya, Anurag
Buck-Boost Converter”, Control and Intelligent Systems, Vol. Choudhary,“Modelling Control And Simulation Of MPPT For
38, No. 4, PP. 245–255, 2010. Wind Energy Conversion Using Matlab/Simulink”, The
[15] Z. Chen, J. Hu, and W. Gao, “Closed-loop analysis and Engineering Journal of Application & Scopes (TEJAS) Vol.1,
control of a non-inverting buck-boost converter,” International Issue 2, , ISSN-2456-0472.
Journal Control, Vol. 83. No. 11, PP. 2294–2307, Nov. 2010. [21] Ned Mohan , Tore M. Undeland , William P. Robbins , “
[16] Z. Chen, “PI and sliding mode control of a cuk converter,” Power Electronics Converters ,Application And Design” ,
IEEE TransactionPower Electronics, Vol. 27, No. 8, PP. Second Edition, Johan Willy & Sons New York ISBN 9971-
3695–3703, Aug. 2012. 51-177-0 in 2002
[17] H. Sira-Ramırez and S. K. Agrawal, Differentially Flat [22] Michael Green, “Design Calculation for Buck-Boost
Systems, Net York: Marcel Dekker, 2004. Converter” Texans Instruments, Application report
[18] H. Sira-Ramırez and R. Silva-Ortigoza, Control Design SLVA535A-Aug -2012.
Techniques in Power Electronics Devices, London: Springer-
Verlag, 2006.