1 inch

(Heading)

Philippine National Police, Administrative Case Number

Complainant, NHQ-AC-111-1111
(DIDM-111-1111)

-versus- For: (Charge/Offense)

(Name of Respondent),
Respondent.
X----------------X
(Single space)
DECISION
(Single space)
(1st para – Background/Reference)

This is an administrative case of …

1 (2nd para - Version of Private Complainant taken from the Sworn Affidavit)
inch
Private Complainant Juana Dela Cruz in her Affidavit dated May 20, 2016,
averred that …..
1
inch
(3rd para - Version of Respondent taken from the Position Paper/Counter-
Affidavit)

Respondent in his Position Paper dated June 25, 2016, denied the accusation
against him and claimed that ….

(4th para - Findings and Recommendations of the Summary Hearing Officer)

The Summary Hearing Officer found the respondent not guilty as charged and
recommended his exoneration.

(5th para – Discussion, Findings, and Recommendations)

In the instant case, the respondent was able to prove that he was actually doing
his duties as police officer during the incident complained of. He was ….

(6th para- Dispositive Portion)

WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Office finds respondent (Name of

Respondent) NOT GUILTY of (Offense). He is hereby Exonerated and the
administrative case against him is dismissed for lack of substantial evidence.
(single space)
SO ORDERED.

Done this _____________________at Camp Crame, Quezon City.

(4 spaces)

5th line RONALD M DELA ROSA

Police Director General
Chief, PNP

1 inch
 Republic of the Philippines
National Police Commission
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS, PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF, PNP
Camp Crame, Quezon City

Philippine National Police, Administrative Case Number

Complainant, IAS-00-000

-versus- For: (Offense/Charge)

(Name of Movant),
Movant.
X--------------------X

RESOLUTION

(1st para – Background/Reference)

This resolves the Motion for Reconsideration (MR) filed by …

(2nd para – Facts of the Case)

Records show that the respondent-movant together with co-respondents PO2
Juan Dela Cruz (Ret.), and PO3 Jose De Juan were charged with …

(3rd para – Movant’s Claims)

In his MR, movant anchored his claim on the following: …

(4th para – Discussion)

This Office finds the instant MR bereft of merit. Section 20, Rule 17 of
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular (NMC) No. 2016-002 provides that …

All told, there is no reason to alter or reverse the assailed decision.

(5th para – Disposition)

WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, the MR filed by PO2 _________
(Ret.), is hereby DENIED. The assailed Decision dated February 9, 2014 is hereby
AFFIRMED.
(single space)
SO RESOLVED.
(single space)
Done this ________________________ at Camp Crame, Quezon City.

(4 spaces)

5th line RONALD M DELA ROSA

Police Director General
Chief, PNP
 1 inch
(Heading)

Philippine National Police, Administrative Case Number

Complainant, NHQ-AC-111-1111
(DIDM-111-1111)

-versus- For: (Charge/Offense)

(Name of Respondent),
Respondent.
X----------------X
(Single space)
REPORT OF INVESTIGATION
(Single space)
(1st para – Background/Reference)

This is an administrative case of …

1 (2nd para - Version of Private Complainant taken from the Sworn Affidavit)
inch
Private Complainant Juana Dela Cruz in her Affidavit dated May 20, 2016,
averred that …..
1
inch
(3rd para - Version of Respondent taken from the Position Paper/Counter-
Affidavit)

Respondent in his Position Paper dated June 25, 2016, denied the accusation
against him and claimed that ….

(4th and 5th para - Findings and Recommendations of the Summary Hearing
Officer)

The Summary Hearing Officer found the respondent not guilty of the charge and
recommended his exoneration.

Xxx

In the instant case, the respondent was able to prove that he was actually doing
his duties as police officer during the incident complained of. He was ….

(6th para- Dispositive Portion)

WHEREFORE, premises considered, respondent (Name of Respondent) is

found NOT GUILTY of (Offense). Hence, recommend that he be Exonerated and the
administrative case against him be dismissed for lack of substantial evidence.
(single space)
SO RECOMMENDED.

Done this _____________________at Camp Crame, Quezon City.

(4 spaces)

5th line (Name of Summary Hearing Officer)