Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DISSERTATION REPORT
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the award of the degree of
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Submitted By
MALAY MITRA CHABEY
Enroll No: 0228CE15MT22
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “The Experimental Study of Compressive
Property of M30 Concrete Using Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Rice Husk Ash as A
Partial Replacement of Cement” being submitted by MALAY MITRA CHAUBEY(Enroll
No-0228CE15MT22) in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of MASTER OF
TECHNOLOGY” in “STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING”. from Shri Ram Group of
Institution, Jabalpur (M.P.) is a record of work done by him under my guidance.
Prof. Prof. Charan Prof. Charan Singh Thakur Dr. Avinash Gour
Singh Thakur Head Principal
Guide Dept. of Civil Engineering SRGI, SRGI, Jabalpur
Dept. of Civil Engineering Jabalpur
SRGI, Jabalpur
SHRI RAM GROUP OF INSTITUTION
Approved by AICTE New Delhi & Govt. of M.P.
Affiliated to Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya
(University Of Technology of Madhya Pradesh)
CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work, which is being presented in dissertation, entitled “The
Experimental Study of Compressive Property of M30 Concrete Using Sugarcane Bagasse
Ash and Rice Husk Ash as A Partial Replacement of Cement” in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of “MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY” in
“STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING”.
submitted in the department of DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Jabalpur
(M.P). is an authentic record of my own work carried under the guidance of PROF. CHARAN
SINGH THAKUR Assistant Professor department of DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL
ENGINEERING Jabalpur (M.P). The matter embodied in this dissertation work has not been
submitted earlier for award of any other degree to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I also declare that’ “A check for Plagiarism has been carried out on the thesis project
report dissertation and is found within the acceptable limit and report of which is enclosed
herewith”.
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that above statement made by the candidate is correct the best of our
knowledge.
Prof. Prof. CHARAN SINGH Prof. CHARAN SINGH THAKUR Dr. AVINASH
THAKUR Head GOUR
Guide Dept. of Civil Engineering Principal
Dept. of Civil Engineering SRGI, SRGI, Jabalpur SRGI, Jabalpur
Jabalpur
SHRI RAM GROUP OF INSTITUTION
Approved by AICTE New Delhi & Govt. of M.P.
Affiliated to Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya
(University Of Technology of Madhya Pradesh)
APPROVAL CERTIFICATE
This dissertation work entitled “The Experimental Study of Compressive Property of M30
Concrete Using Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Rice Husk Ash as A Partial Replacement of
Jabalpur (M.P).
Date: Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With great pleasure and deep sense of gratitude, I take this opportunity to express my sense of
indebtedness to Prof. CHARAN SINGH THAKUR Department. Computer Science &
Engineering., SRGI, Jabalpur, and Prof. CHARAN SINGH THAKUR HEAD. Dept. of Civil
Engineering SRGI, Jabalpur SRGI, Jabalpur for his erudite guidance, affectionate
encouragement and whole hearted involvement in my dissertation, without which it would have
been difficult for me to complete this work.
I express my thanks to all the faculty members and the staff of the Department of CIVIL
Engineering for providing me with the necessary facilities for completing my dissertation
work.
I express my heartfelt gratitude to my friends and also to each and every individual who was
associated with my dissertation work, including those whom I may have inadvertently failed
to mention.
Finally, I am highly obliged to all my family members for their support and blessings.
ABSTRACT
In this thesis the study of compressive strength of concrete has been studied
incorporating Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Rice husk ash as partial replacement
of cement (Ordinary Portland cement 43 grade)with varying percentage of
Sugarcane Bagasse ash and Rice husk ash; appear that the ratio are designed for
target strength and result in increased compressive strength.
The thesis was conducted with M30 grade concrete .the compressive strength
test was performed on 90 number of concrete cube of size 150 mm × 150 mm
× 150 mm. The study is done with Sugarcane Bagasse Ash 0%,10% ,
20% ,and 30% Rice husk ash 0%,10%,20% and 30% For each replacement
percent of cement total 09 number of cube were tested 03 numbers of cube for 07
days ,03 number of cube for 14 days and 03 numbers of cube for 28 days .
The test of compressive strength of concrete has been done and result are show
in graph between the compressive strength and percentage of Sugarcane Bagasse
Ash and Rice husk ash.
This research has show that the Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Rice husk ash.have
potential to produce high performance of concrete and it will also improve the
properties fresh and hardened concrete.
KEY WORDS: - Rice husk ash(RHA), Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SBA), cement
replacement, concrete, Compressive strength, Workability.
CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION
There has been alarming rate of increase in the price of building materials in the
recent past. This has necessitated government, private and individuals to go in
research for locally sourced materials to supplement (replace-fully or partially)
the conventional materials. The increasing demand for cement and concrete is
met by the partial replacement of cement. The whole concept of this idea is to
ensure that an average working class citizen of India will be able to own a house.
Concrete is a composite material which consists eccentrically of a binding
medium. Concrete is no longer made of aggregate Portland cement and water
only. Often but not always it has to incorporate at least one of the additional
ingredients such as admixture or cementations material to enhance its strength
and durability. Within which are embedded particles or fragments of relative inert
filler in Portland cement concrete. The binder is a mixture of Portland cement.
The filler may be any of a wide variety of natural or artificial. Fine and coarse
aggregate; and in some instances an admixture. Concrete is presently one of the
most popular materials used in building construction and other civil engineering
works. When reinforced with steel, it has a higher capacity for carrying loads.
Concrete being a heterogeneous material. The quality of the constituents and the
proportions in which they are mixed, determine its strength and other properties.
Shukeri Ritzawaty binti Mohamad and Ghani A.Naser Abdul, (2008) [1].
“Concrete Mix With Waste” Compressive strength, Concrete mix, This research
is aim to evaluate the addition of paper waste to concrete mix, to study the effect
of paper waste on the strength of concrete, and to develop mixture proportions
for concrete containing waste, In general, each group of concrete mixes
containing paper waste, compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural
strength of concrete decreased with the increase of the amount of paper waste.
Concrete mix with 5% paper waste showed higher tensile strength and flexural
strength than control mix. Good relationship was observed in compressive,
tensile, and flexural strength of concrete mixes containing paper waste
Ahmad Sajad, Malik M. Iqbal, Wani Muzaffar Bashir, Ahmad Rafiq, (2013)
[2]. “Study of Concrete Involving Use of Waste Paper Sludge Ash as Partial
Replacement of Cement”, Compressive strength, Durability, split tensile strength,
Waste Paper Sludge Ash Concrete, Workability. This work examines the
possibility of using waste paper sludge ash as partial replacement of cement for
new concrete.5% replacement of cement by waste paper sludge ash showed 10%
increase in compressive strength at 7 days and 15% increase in compressive
strength at 28 days. With increase in waste paper sludge ash content, percentage
water absorption increases. Splitting tensile strength decreases with increase in
waste paper sludge ash content and is more than reference concrete at 5%
replacement.
Pitroda Prof. Jayeshkumar, Zala Dr. L.B., Umrigar Dr.F.S., (2013) [4].
“Innovative use of paper industry waste (hypo sludge) in design mix concrete”,
Compressive Strength, Split Strength, hypo sludge (supplementary cementitious
material), hypo sludge Concrete. The cement has been replaced by waste paper
sludge accordingly in the range of 0% (without Hypo sludge), 10%, 20%, 30% &
40% by weight for M-25 and M-40 mix. Concrete mixtures were produced, tested
and compared in terms of strength with the conventional concrete. Compressive
strength reduces when cement replaced hypo sludge. As hypo sludge percentage
increases compressive strength and split strength decreases. Compressive
strength reduces when cement replaced hypo sludge. As hypo sludge Percentage
increases compressive strength and split strength decreases.
Monte M.C., Fuente E., Blanco A. and Negro C., (2009)[ 5]. “Waste
management from Pulp and Paper Production in the European Union”, Paper
industry wastes, pulp and paper sludge, solid waste generation, waste recovery,
waste minimization. The European paper industry generates about 11 million
tonnes of waste, 70% of which originates from recycled paper production. The
waste is very diverse in composition and consists of rejects, different types of
sludges and, in case of on-site incineration, ashes. The production of pulp and
paper from virgin pulp generates less waste and the waste has the same properties
as deinking waste, although with less inorganic content. Within the European
Union several already issued and other, foreseen directives have great influence
on the waste management strategy of paper producing companies. Through
legislation, the landfill option is restricted, although it has not phased out on-site
landfills.
Das K. C. and Tollner E.W., (1998)[ 8]. “Composition Pulp and paper Industry
Solid Waste: Process Design and Product Evaluation”, Pulp and paper Industry
Solid Wastes, Improving handling characteristics of sludges and ash. Reducing
weight, moisture content and volume, and removing nuisance due to odors. The
best mix from a Degradation stand point was 57% (dry weight basis) sludge, 25%
grit, 6% bark and 12% ash. The mix (-) had an initial moisture content of 54%
and a UN ratio of 412.7. From a degradation standpoint the ammonium nitrate
amended mixes result in greater amount of pulp mill solids being processed
within a given time period. From a product quality standpoint, chicken litter
amended compost was superior. It provided higher and a wider Variety of
nutrients.
9. BRE Dr. Andrew M Dunster, (2007) [9]. “Paper sludge and paper sludge ash
in Portland cement manufacture”, Paper sludge, Paper sludge ash, Portland
cement. This case study describes the potential use of mill paper sludge and its
derivatives, as ingredients in Portland cement manufacture. The study includes
the use of the fly ash from combined heat & power (CHP) combustion of paper
sludge (as a cement clinker input material) and the sludge itself (as an alternative
liquid fuel). Paper sludge and paper sludge ash are potentially useful products in
the manufacture of cement and in blended cement. There is a large supply of
paper sludge ash available from industrial CHP plants. A quality protocol for the
ash material is being considered as part of the Quality Protocols programme.
4.1 Aim:
The aim of this experimental investigation is to study the variation in
strength characteristics of concrete structural elements, for the proportion of M30
grade. In each mixes containing different percentages of Rice husk ash (RHA)
and sugarcane bagasse Ash (SBA) is replaced by means of cement starting from
0% as normal concrete, i.e. controlled concrete 10%, 20%, and 30%, .The
number of specimens casted for each case is as follows.
1. Workability of concrete test like slump cone test and compaction factor
test.
2. Mechanical properties like Compressive strength,
Curing
Sl. Particular Mix No. of period
Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M1 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 4: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 10%
Rice husk ash and 0% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M2 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No.5: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 20% Rice
husk ash and 0% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M3 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 6: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 30%
Rice husk ash and 0% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M4 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 7: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 0% Rice
husk ash and 10% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M5 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 8: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 0% Rice
husk ash and 20% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M6 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 9: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 0% Rice
husk ash and 30% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M7 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 10: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 5%
Rice husk ash and 5% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M8 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 11: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 10%
Rice husk ash and 10% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M9 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 12: Casting and Curing of M30 Grade of Concrete with 15%
Rice husk ash and 15% sugarcane bagasse Ash.
Curing
Sl. Mix No. of period
Particular Code Remark
No. Design Specimen in
Days
Cube size
1 Cube M30 M10 9 no’s 7, 14,28 150x150x
150mm
Table No. 13: Sieve analysis of fine aggregate
Cumulat
Cumul Cumulat
Weigh ive
IS Corre ative ive
SR. t Corre percenta
SIEVE cted weight percenta
NO retaine ction ge
SIZE weight retaine ge
d (gm) weight
d passing
retained
1. 10mm - - - - - -
2. 4.75m 25 +0.5 25.5 25.5 2.55 97.45
m
3. 2.36m 29 +0.58 29.58 55.08 5.508 94.50
m
4. 1.18m 209 +4.18 213.18 268.26 26.826 73.18
m
5. 600µ 317 +6.34 323.34 591.60 59.16 40.84
6. 300µ 350 +7.0 357 948.60 94.86 5.16
7. 150µ 50 +1.0 51.0 999.6 99.96 0.04
Immediately after filling, the cone is slowly lifted, and the unsupported
concrete will now slump hence the name of the test. The decrease in the height
of the slumped concrete is called slump and is measured to the nearest 5mm (1/4
inch). The decrease is measured to the highest point according to IS: 456-2000
b5 1881: Part 102: 1983, but to the displaced original center according to ASTMC
143-90a. In order to reduce the influence on slump of the variation in the surface
friction, the inside of the mould and its base should be moistened at the beginning
of every test, and prior to lifting of the mould the area immediately around the
base of the cone should be cleaned of concrete which may have dropped
accidentally.
Instead of slumping evenly all rounds as in true slum figure one of the cone slides
down an inclined plane, a shear slump is said to have taken place, and the test should
be repeated. If shear slump persists, as may be the case with harsh mixes, this is an
indication of lack of cohesion in the mix.
Medium 35 – 75
High 80 – 155
Very high 160 to collapse
Source: IS code 10262(2009)
Table No. 16: Workability of various concrete mixes design for slump cone
test is as follows
Mix design codes Slump cone test in mm.
M1-MIX (normal concrete) 38
M2-MIX (10% RHA) 42
M3-MIX (20% RHA) 43
M4-MIX (30% RHA) 45
M8-MIX (5% SCA AND 5% RHA) 47
M10-MIX (15% SCA AND 15% RHA) 48
60
50
40
SLUMP CONE
30
TEST IN MM.
20
10
0
M1 M2 M3 M4 M8 M10
MIX DESIGN CODES
0.9
0.88
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.8
M1 M2 M3 M4 M8 M10
MIX DESIGN CODES
Fc = p/a.
Where,
fc = cube compressive strength in N/mm²
P = cube compressive causing failure in N.
A = cross-sectional area of cube
Numbers of cubes tested for different proportions with conventional
concrete and at different percentage of Rice husk ash(RHA), Sugarcane Bagasse
Ash (SBA)concrete as shown in table and graph.
Rice
husk
ash( 0 10 20 30 00 00
RHA 0 5 10 15
) (%)
Suga
rcane
Baga
sse 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 5 10 15
Ash
(SBA
) (%)
Test
age 3-3 SAMPLES
(days COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (N/mm²)
)
22.0 23.3 23.7 25.3 24.8 24.0
22.6 27.9 24.9 24.5
22.5 23.2 23.8 25.5 24.0 23.1
22.5 28.0 26.5 24.4
7 22.0 23.4 23.9 25.1 24.4 25.2
22.6 27.8 26.3 25.2
Av=22. Av= Av=2 Av=25 Av=24. Av=24.
Av=22.5 Av=27.9 Av=25.9 Av=24.7
1 23.3 3.8 .3 4 1
25.0 26.7 27.7 28.4 29.0 29.2 29.6 32.8 32.2 29.5
25.0 26.8 27.8 28.3 31.8 30.5 28.0 32.9 31.0 30.7
14 25.6 26.9 27.9 28.5 30.4 28.5 28.8 32.7 30.4 28.6
Av=25. Av=26.8 Av= Av=2 Av=30 Av=29. Av=28. Av=32.8 Av=31.2 Av=29.6
2 27.8 8.4 .4 2 8
29.5 30.0 32.2 32 36.5 35.0 34.5 37.0 37.0 34.5
28 29.0 31.0 32.3 31.5 34.5 33.0 32.5 36.5 38.0 33.5
29.5 32.0 32.4 33 35.5 34.0 33.5 36.0 37.5 35.5
Av=29. Av=31 Av= Av=3 Av=35 Av=34 Av=33. Av=36.5 Av=37.5 Av=34.5
3 32.3 2.1 .5 5
40
35
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (N/MM2)
30
25
20
15
10
0
7 14 28
AGE (DAYS).
40
35
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (N/mm2)
30
25
20
15
10
0
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6
Graph No. 4:: Showing the variation of compressive strength with age for
various Rice huak Ash and Sugarcane bagasse Ash percentages of M30
grade
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH VERSUS AGE.
40
35
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (N/MM2)
30
25
20
15
10
0
7 14 28
AGE (DAYS).
35
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (N/mm2)
30
25
20
15
10
0
M-7 M-8 M-9 M-10
RICE HUSK ASH AND SUGARCANE ASH (PERCENTAGE)
Graph No. 6:: Showing the variation of compressive strength with age for
various Rice huak Ash and Sugarcane bagasse Ash percentages of M30
grade
4.10 Cost Analysis
Concrete is a versatile material and largely used in construction. The raw
materials required for manufacture of the product are Portland cement and
aggregates which are available locally in every part of the country. when we
determine cost of a 1 m3. Here general cost of concrete is determined by simply
calculating aggregates and cement content by its present rate. One bag of the
cement which is of 50 kg is of approximately INR 315/- i.e. 1 kg of cement is of
INR 6.3/- if we replace 30% of the cement by any waste material, so
approximately 15kg of the cement is saved so that INR 94.5/- is saved on per bag
that means 30% of the cost is saved.
CHAPTER – 5
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1. Use of high strength concrete for the combination of RHS and SBA.
2. To study the effect of different types of mineral admixtures like silica ,fly
ash ,RHA and SBA.
3. To study the effect of super plasticizers.
4. To study the use of RHA and SBA in ocean structures where concrete may
be in affected by sulphur and chloride paricles.
5. To study the strength behavior of RHA and SBA obtained from very old
structures which are very pervious and easily affected by chemical
reaction.
CHAPTER – 7
CONCLUSION
The result of study shows that there are good prospects of using Rice husk Ash
(RHA), Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SBA) as a pozzolana combination with ordinary
Portland cement (OPC) in the Concrete cube. M-30 grade concrete cube is casted
and its compressive strength and workability is determined. The combination of
10%, 20% and 30% cement replacement Mix is prepared by using agricultural
waste.
Workability of the concrete increased with the increased percentage of Sugarcane
Bagasse Ash in concrete and decreased with increased percentage of Rice husk.
It has been observed that Sugarcane Bagasse gives very good workability when
they replace cement in concrete.
Compressive Strength of concrete increased with increasing percentage mix give
good compressive strength. When Rice Husk Ash replace cement in concrete it
has been observed that its 10% and 20% mix gives good compressive strength.
Concrete is a versatile building material which is largely used in construction.
When cement is replaced by these waste material upto 30%. By using these waste
material INR 94.5/- can be saved on per bag of cement i.e. 30% of the cost.
From the study conducted, it was clearly shown that Rice husk ash (RHA),
Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SBA), are pozzolanic material and can contribute to the
sustainability to the construction material.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] Shukeri Ritzawaty binti Mohamad and Ghani A.Naser Abdul, (2008)
[2] Ahmad Sajad, Malik M. Iqbal, Wani Muzaffar Bashir, Ahmad Rafiq, (2013)
“Study of Concrete Involving Use of Waste Sugarcane Ash as Partial
Replacement of Cement”
[3] Balwaik Sumit A, Raut S P, (2013) “Utilization of Waste rice husk ash by
Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete”,
[4] Pitroda Prof. Jayeshkumar, Zala Dr. L.B., Umrigar Dr.F.S., (2013)
“Innovative use of paper industry waste (hypo sludge) in design mix concrete”,
[5] Monte M.C., Fuente E., Blanco A. and Negro C., (2009)
[7] Likon Marko and Trebše Polonca, (2012) A case study of Rice Husk
[9] BRE Dr. Andrew M Dunster, (2007) “Paper sludge and paper sludge ash in
Portland cement manufacture”, Paper sludge, Paper sludge ash, Portland cement..
[10] Pitroda Jayeshkumar R, Umrigar Dr F S, (2013) [10]. “Evaluation of
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by
Thermal Industry Waste (Fly Ash)
[11] V. Zivica, Hardening and properties of cement based materials incorporating
heavy metal oxides. Bulletin material science, 20(1997) p 677-683.
[13] K. Erdogdu, P. Turker. Effect of fly ash partical size on strength of Portland
cement fly ash mortars, cement concrete Reasearch, 28(1998) P 1217-1222
[16] L.C. Lange, C.D. Hills, A.B. Poole, Preliminary investigation in to the effect
of carbonation of cement solidified hazardous waste,Env. Science Technology.
30(1996)P 25-32.
[29] M.U Dabai, 1C. Muhammad, 1B.U. Bagudo and 2A. MusaDepartment of
Pure and Applied Chemistry, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokotob Cement
Company of the Northern Nigeria Plc, Sokoto. Studies on the Effect of Rice Husk
Ash as Cement Admixture, Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science
(2009), 17(2)252-256
[30] British Standards Institution, BS 1881: Part 116 (1983) Method for
determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes. London, BSI.