Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

FATIGUE LIFE ESTIMATION FOR A CIRCUMFERENTIAL

JOINT OF THE AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE


THROUGH STRESS ANALYSIS
Vineeth Katkam1, Venkate Gowda.C2, K.E.Girish3
1,2
Mechanical Engineering Department,Nagarjuna College of Engineering & Technology, Bengaluru-
562110,1vineethkatkam@gmail.com,2venkategowdancet@gmail.com,3girish@bailindia.com

Keywords: Transport aircraft, Fuselage, Splice joint, Finite growth life of the component is greater than the design
element method, Stress analysis, Fatigue life, Crack service goal plus some factor of safety. The latter approach is
initiation. most commonly used and relies on the ability to predict
fatigue crack growth at fatigue critical locations.
Abstract Fractographic information obtained from teardown and
failure analysis of retired aircraft indicates that predicting
Aircraft is a mechanical structure which can fly in air. Civil growth of two unsymmetrical (different crack length and/or
Aircraft is used for transportation and fighter aircraft for crack depth) corner cracks on opposite sides of a fastener
defense purpose. It is a challenge in front of the aircraft hole is necessary [1,2]. In a fracture mechanics context, the
structural designer to bring out a safest structure with stress intensity factor, K, is required for such predictions [1].
minimum weight. Airframe is the load bearing structure of
the aircraft. Fuselage and wing are the major primary 1.1 Splice joint
structural components of the airframe. Fuselage is a
cylindrical structure which houses passenger seats. Fuselage
is a semi-monologue structure. It is stiffened orthogonally A splice joint is a method of joining two members end to end
with stiffening members along longitudinal and in woodworking. The splice joint is used when the material
circumferential directions. The skin of the fuselage is spliced being joined is not available in the length required. It is an
both in longitudinal and circumferential directions. These alternative to other joints such as the butt joint and the Scarf
joints will be critical due to bending and pressurization loads joint Splice joints are stronger than unreinforced butt joints
in the fuselage. In this project stress analysis of the and have the potential to be stronger than a scarf joint. They
circumferential splice joint in the fuselage structure is carried are more visible than a scarf joint but may be preferred when
out. The internal pressurization load case is considered to be more strength is required. Splices are therefore most often
one of the critical load cases during the design and used when structural elements are required in longer lengths
development of the aircraft. A panel representing the location than the available material. The most common form of the
of circumferential joint is identified for evaluation of the splice joint is the half lap splice, which is common in
structural integrity of the fuselage. The panel consists of two building construction, where it is used to join shorter lengths
skin plates, part of the bulkhead, tear strap and rivets. of timber into longer beams.
Longitudinal stress produced because of the internal
pressurization and the tensile stress due to bending of the 1.2 Fatigue Definition
fuselage will make this joint critical from the fatigue crack Fatigue is a phenomenon associated with variable loading or
initiation point of view. Stress analysis will be carried out on
more precisely to cyclic stressing or straining of a material.
this panel to identify the maximum tensile stress location in
Just as we human beings get fatigue when a specific task is
the panel. Fatigue cracks will always get initiated from the repeatedly performed, in a similar manner metallic
location of maximum tensile stress. components subjected to variable loading get fatigue, which
leads to their premature failure under specific conditions.
1 Introduction
1.3 Fatigue loading
In assembling complex structures like military or
commercial aircraft, riveted or bolted joints are primarily Fatigue loading is primarily the type of loading which causes
used as they offer many options to the designer. To satisfy cyclic variations in the applied stress or strain on a
fatigue requirements, the designer can either keep the stress component. Thus any variable loading is basically a fatigue
levels below the endurance limit or ensure the slow crack loading.
1.4 Fatigue Failure- Aircraft are flown at high altitudes for two reasons. First, an
aircraft flown at high altitude consumes less fuel for a given
Mechanism A fatigue failure begins with a small crack; the airspeed than it does for the same speed at a lower altitude
initial crack may be so minute and cannot be detected. The because the aircraft is more efficient at a high altitude.
crack usually develops at a point of localized stress Second, bad weather and turbulence may be avoided by
concentration like discontinuity in the material, such as a flying in relatively smooth air above the storms. Many
change in cross section, a keyway or a hole. Once a crack is modern aircraft are being designed to operate at high
initiated, the stress concentration effect become greater and altitudes, taking advantage of that environment. In order to
the crack propagates. Consequently the stressed area fly at higher altitudes, the aircraft must be pressurized. It is
decreases in size, the stress increase in magnitude and the important for pilots who fly these aircraft to be familiar with
crack propagates more rapidly. Until finally, the remaining the basic operating principles. In a typical pressurization
area is unable to sustain the load and the component fails system, the cabin, flight compartment, and baggage
suddenly. Thus fatigue loading results in sudden, unwarned compartments are incorporated into a sealed unit capable of
failure. containing air under a pressure higher than outside
atmospheric pressure. On aircraft powered by turbine
1.5 Fatigue Failure Stages engines, bleed air from the engine compressor section is used
to pressurize the cabin. Superchargers may be used on older
Thus three stages are involved in fatigue failure namely model turbine-powered aircraft to pump air into the sealed
fuselage. Piston-powered aircraft may use air supplied from
-Crack initiation each engine turbocharger through a sonic venture (flow
limiter). Air is released from the fuselage by a device called
-Crack propagation an outflow valve. By regulating the air exit, the outflow
-Fracture valve allows for a constant inflow of air to the pressurized
area [2].
Crack initiation
3 Geometric configuration of the fuselage:
• Crack are generally originate from a geometrical
discontinuity or metallurgical stress raiser like sites of A segment of the fuselage is considered in the current study.
inclusions Crack propagation. The structural components of the fuselage are skin, bulkhead
and Stiffeners. Geometric modeling is carried out by using
• As a result of the local stress concentrations at these CATIA V16 2012 software. The total length of the structure
locations, the induced stress goes above the yield strength (in is 1750mm and diameter is 2200mm. It contains 5nos Z
normal ductile materials) and cyclic plastic straining results section (Bulkhead) and 40nos L section (Stiffeners).
due to cyclic variations in the stresses. On a macro scale the
average value of the induced stress might still be below the
yield strength of the material.

• This further increases the stress levels and the process


continues, propagating the cracks across the grains or along
the grain boundaries, slowly increasing the crack size.

• As the size of the crack increases the cross sectional area


resisting the applied stress decreases and reaches a thresh
hold level at which it is insufficient to resist the applied
stress.
Figure 1. geometric configuration of aircraft fuselage.
Final fracture: As the area becomes too insufficient to resist
the induced stresses any further a sudden fracture results in
the component. Results from an experimental and analytical
study of a curved stiffened panel subjected to axial
compression load are presented. Nonlinear analysis was
carried out and validated by the experimental results.

2 Aircraft cabin pressurization.


Figure 2. Z sect stiffeners.
Figure 4. displacement contour of fuselage structure.

Stress contour of fuselage structure

Figure 3. L sect stiffeners.

4 Methodology
x Solution by FEM method
x Analytical Investigation
Solution by FEM method: The project work involves the
analysis of the splice joint using software’s
Figure 5. Maximum stress exists in doubler plate.
MSC/NASTRON & MSC/PATRON. Also, fatigue
prediction of splice joint would be carried out.
6 Analytical solution for fuselage
Software’s used analysis.
1. MSC/NASTRON & 2.MSC/PATRON Calculating For Maximum Stress
୔୰ ο୪
A two-dimensional finite element-analysis will be carried ı୫ୟ୶ ൌ ,‫א‬ൌ & ı ൌ  ‫אכ‬
୲ ୪
out on the splice joint panel. Distribution of fasteners loads
and local stress field at rivet locations will be studied from Where p = Pressure In Fuselage.
finite element analysis. The work also involves the
modifications required to correct the boundary effects of the r = Radius Of Fuselage.
panel. The global finite element analysis of a segment of
typical fuselage will be carried out. This global finite t = Thickness Of Fuselage.
element analysis results will be bench mark for comparing
the results from the splice joint panel analysis. Repeated W.K.T 1psi = 0.0007kg/mm2
finite element analysis will be carried out to get the response
of the parent structure (fuselage) at the joint location. The Calculating for 7.5psi,
response of the splice joint will be evaluated through finite
element analysis.
Displacement Maximum
5 Results Sl. no. Method
(mm) Stress (MPa)
Displacement contour of fuselage structure
1 Analytical 1.4437 56.625 Techniques for Ageing Air Vehicles held in
Manchester, United Kingdom.
2 FEM 1.39 49.23 [5] “New Techniques for Detecting Fatigue Damage
Accumlation in Aircraft Structural Components”
Curtis A. Rideout Scott J. Ritchie IEEEAC paper
#1244, Version 2, November 29, 2006.
[6] “Post Buckling Simulation of an Integral Aluminum
7 Conclusion Fuselage Panel Subjected To Axial Compression
Load” Sun Weimin, Tong Mingbo, Guo Liang, and
In order to improve the aircraft life and make it defect free, Dong Dengke 2008 Asia Simulation Conference —
stress analysis and fatigue life prediction is carried out on 7th Intl. Conf. on Sys. Simulation and Scientific
aircraft structure through FEM approach. A FEM approach is Computing.
followed by the stress analysis of aircraft structure, the
internal pressure is one of the main load that the fuselage
needs to hold. Stress analysis is carried on structure to
identify maximum stress location in the structure. Local
analysis is carried out at maximum stress location for fatigue
life prediction.

Acknowledgement
I wish to thank Prof, Venkategowda C., Department of
Mechanical Engineering (PG) at Nagarjuna college Of
Engineering & Technology, Bangalore, for guiding and
encouraging me throughout the work. I would like to extend
many thanks to our HOD, Dr.N G Subramanya Udupa,
Department of Mechanical Engineering (PG), Nagarjuna
college Of Engineering & Technology, Bangalore, for
supporting during course. Also sincere thanks to Girish K.E,
Director of Bangalore Aircraft Industries(P) Ltd, B’lore for
giving all available facilities & technology inputs in during
work.

References
[1] Using The World Largest Stress Intensity Factor
Database For Fatigue Life Predictions, Scott A.
Fawaz First International Conference on Damage
Tolerance of Aircraft Structures R. Benedictus, J.
Schijve, R.C. Alderliesten, J.J. Homan (Eds.)
[2] Fatigue Damage In Aircraft Structures Not Wanted
But Tolerated, Jaap Schijve Delft University of
Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS, The Netherlands First
International Conference on Damage Tolerance of
Aircraft Structures © TU Delft, The Netherlands.
[3] U.G. Goranson, Damage Tolerance, Facts and
Fiction. 14th Plantema Memorial Lecture,
Proceedings 17th ICAF Symposium, Stockholm, 3-
105, 1993.
[4] Experimental Technical For Aircraft Fuselage
Structures Containing Damage” Padraic E.
O’Donoghue, Jinsan Ju Paper presented at the R TO
A VT Specialists 'Meeting on "Life Management

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen