Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Consequentialist Approach
Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of
an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the
act.
Example: most people would agree that lying is wrong. But if telling a lie would help save
a person's life, consequentialism says it's the right thing to do.
Deontological Approach
is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that
action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of
the action. It is sometimes describes as duty-, obligation- or rule-based ethics.
Example: an act that is not good morally can lead to something good, such as shooting the intruder
(killing is wrong) to protect your family (protecting them is right
Justice approach
States that an ethical decision is a decision that distributes benefits and harms (costs) among
stakeholders in a fair, equitable, or impartial way.
Emotive approach
He suggests that morals and ethics are just the personal viewpoints and “moral judgements are
meaningless expressions of emotions.” ... This means that if a person feels good about an act, then in
his view, it is a moral act.
Example: Not joining the army at the time of war maybe unethical and unpatriotic from the point of
view of society and the country but the person concerned may consider war as immoral in itself.
TWO THEORIES OF ETHICS
Deontology
The deontological class of ethical theories states that people should adhere to their obligations and
duties when engaged in decision making when ethics are in play. This means that a person will follow
his or her obligations to another individual or society because upholding one’s duty is what is
considered ethically correct. For instance, a deontologist will always keep his promises to a friend and
will follow the law. A person who adheres to deontological theory will produce very consistent
decisions since they will be based on the individual’s set duties.
Virtue
The virtue ethical theory judges a person by his/her character rather than by an action that may
deviate from his/her normal behavior. It takes the person’s morals, reputation, and motivation into
account when rating an unusual and irregular behavior that is considered unethical. For instance, if a
person plagiarized a passage that was later detected by a peer, the peer who knows the person well
will understand the person’s character and will judge the friend accordingly.
What Is A Whistleblower?
A whistleblower is someone that blows the whistle! No, not the tiny flute instrument. We're
talking about someone that calls out, or reports, someone else's wrongdoing. A whistleblower is a
person working within an organization who reports that organization's misconduct. The person
can be a current or past employee. Also, note that the misconduct can be a past act, can be
ongoing, or can be in the planning stages.
There are two types of whistleblowing. The first is internal whistleblowing. This means that the
whistleblower reports misconduct to another person within the organization. The second type is
external whistleblowing. This means that the whistleblower reports misconduct to a person
outside the organization, such as law enforcement or the media .
Transparency
In simplest terms, transparency means having nothing to hide. For a company, this means it
allows its processes and transactions observable to outsiders. It also makes necessary disclosures,
informs everyone affected about its decisions, and complies with legal requirements.
Transparency is a critical component of corporate governance because it ensures that all of a
company’s actions can be checked at any given time by an outside observer. This makes its
processes and transactions verifiable, so if a question does come up about a step, the company
can provide a clear answer. And after the Enron scandal in 2001, transparency is no longer just an
option, but a legal requirement that a company has to comply with.
Accountability
Accountability, which means answerability or liability. Shareholders are deeply interested in who
will take the blame when something goes wrong in one of a company’s many processes. And even
when everything goes smoothly as expected, knowing that someone will be held accountable for
future mishaps increases shareholders’ confidence, which in turn increases their desire to invest
more. Again, this concern over accountability goes back to the financial scandals in the early
2000s, in which there had been a lot of money stolen, but not enough people to answer for the
crime.When the idea of accountability is approached with this positive outlook, people will be
more open to it as a means to improve their performance. This applies from the staff all the way
up to the corporate board.
Security
A company is expected to make their processes transparent and their people accountable while
keeping their enterprise data secure from unauthorized access. There is simply no compromise for
this. Companies that experience security breaches involving the exposure of their clients’ personal
information quickly lose their credibility. To get back the public’s trust, extensive damage control
is called for — just look at what had to be done after Neiman Marcus and Target suffered from
data leakage Thus, even with accountability and transparency, a company without inadequate
security measures will have a hard time attracting shareholders. After all, any scandal — even a
breach caused by third-party hackers — can have a negative effect on a company’s stock market
performance.
CORPORATE CRIMES
Corporate crime has been considered the time and again to be the greater version to white collar
jobs as it involves crimes performed by the higher class of our society. The concept of corporate
crimes and white collar crimes overlap with each other. One of it is crimes committed by
individuals who are in the decision making the level of corporate sectors against their workers,
society or the environment and the other is crimes done for their own benefit.
TYPES OF WHITE COLLAR CRIME
1. Bank Fraud:
To engage in an act or pattern of activity where the purpose is to defraud a bank of funds.
2. Blackmail:
A demand for money or other consideration under threat to do bodily harm, to injure property, to accuse of a
crime, or to expose secrets.
3. Bribery:
When money, goods, services, information or anything else of value is offered with intent to influence the
actions, opinions, or decisions of the taker. You may be charged with bribery whether you offer the bribe or
accept it.
4. Computer fraud:
Where computer hackers steal information sources contained on computers such as: bank information, credit
cards, and proprietary information.
5. Counterfeiting:
Occurs when someone copies or imitates an item without having been authorized to do so and passes the copy
off for the genuine or original item. Counterfeiting is most often associated with money however can also be
associated with designer clothing, handbags and watches.
7. Currency Schemes:
The practice of speculating on the future value of currencies.
8. Embezz1ement
When a person who has been entrusted with money or property appropriates it for his or her own use and
benefit.
Marketing executives face with a lot of ethical problems related to planning and application of product
strategies. For example,
• in new product development process, since ethics and legal subjects are discussed less than it is needed, faulty
products are put on the market and so these products damage consumers. This grows out of seeing product
security as engineering problem in most. Similarly, some product areas such as especially toys for children are
sensitive to the ethical problems . For this reason, ethical way of thinking should come into all levels of
marketing from engineering to customer support
• Other ethical issues related to product decisions, information on labels can sometimes be used as deceptive
although it is technically true, rubbish problem which packing cause after its usage, failing in terms of guarantee
related to product and performing planned product obselence to shorten product life cycle. .
PRICE
• However, when monopolistic power is had, it is seen that unreasonable price increase is set.
• Other ethical issues related to pricing include non-price price increases, misleading price reduction, price
advertisements which can be misleading or considered as deceitful and their limits are not explained well,
PLACE
Ethical issues related to place grow out of enterprises, which form channel of distribution, have different needs
and goals. At power relationship in the channel, if channel members to put their power which they have into bad
use, this may cause an ethical problem. For example, a powerful manufacturer may force retailer to conduct in
different ways in subjects such as choice of retailer locations, minimum order size, product mix selection,
restriction on alternative supply resources and arrangement of physical condition in retailer’s location.
Other ethical issues result in subjects as retailing decisions, direct marketing, supply and channel management.
• Ethical issues related to retailing decisions eventuate in areas such as buying, product assortment, pricing,
selling, forward buying and slotting allowances.
• Ethical issues in direct marketing are the subjects which are privacy, confidentiality and intrusion
• Ethical problems which are faced while using of internet for marketing are reliability of operations, illegal
activities, privacy, accuracy, pornographic, product guarantees, burglary, aiming at children, spams, deceptive
advertisements.
PROMOTION
Whether advertisements are ethics or not is determined according to the extent of loss of advertisements to
consumers. Loss can be defined in three ways:
• breach of the autonomy with control or manipulation,
• aggression to privacy, and
• breach of right to know .
Ethical problems in advertising can be analysed under two main headings:
• the content of advertising message and
• agent/customer relationships.