Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Q1:
The risks that are identified are the breaking down of shelves, inhalation of waste materials and accidents due to wet areas created by
watering of plants.
Q2:
Steel shelves have been introduced and supervisors are engaged for continuous monitoring.
Disposing of waste materials and hazardous warnings has been introduced.
Storage of mops in all the water prone areas
Q3:
Q1:
The Kingfisher Garden Centre does not have any risk management standards (Bromiley et al. 2015)
Assessment Task 1.3 Determine scope for risk management standards
Q1:
Situations
Locations
Stakeholders
Internal stakeholders
• National Merchandising Manager
• National contracts coordinator
• Store Managers
• National Manager of finance and legal
• Manager of IT
External stakeholders
Q1:
Stakeholders Issues
Internal stakeholders
• National Merchandising Manager The workers do not concentrate on the non merchandising factors.
• National contracts coordinator
The coordinator does not supervise its subordinates in doing any job.
• Store Managers
The stores are not maintained properly.
• National Manager of finance and
The works does not follow legal laws and discrepancy in finance is often
legal
noticed.
• Manager of IT
Lack of knowledge about modern technology (McNeil et al. 2015)
Q1:
Political The policy of making policies If not correctly chosen may result in
serious problems.
Economic The financial expenditures and the gains must be monitored regularly. Discrepancy in profit
Social Proper maintenance of shops and its products as well Consumers may face problems.
technologies.
policies.
Assessment Task 1.6 Review legislation
Q1:
Q1:
Strength Weakness
Q1:
Communication
Culture
IT
Organisational structure
Assessment Task 1.9 Obtain support for risk management activities
Q1:
National manager of finance, manager of the state, manager associated with consumer relationship are the managers one need to get
Q2:
Q1:
communicated to?
Step 3: Analysis of risk and Project Managers Internet, mail, text messages,
Risk identification.
Reaching the ultimate destination within the given time (Dionne, 2013)
The head manager, Sales Manager, Store manager and the head of every department are considered (Bolton et al. 2013)
5. When considering the context of a risk management plan, which background information should you investigate?
Employee safety
6. Once you have reviewed your current procedures and standards what is the next step when creating a risk
management plan?
7. Which goal, for a risk management plan is SMART, clear and achievable?
The goal must be delivery of information that are easily understandable to everyone (Baxter et al. 2013).
8. Time is critical, and you want to meet your goal timelines. Which is the best way to gain support from
stakeholders for a risk management plan?
9. What is the best way to invite participation for the risk management process from internal stakeholders?
Q1:
Consultation plan
Q1:
tool/technique
management
Task 2.4 – Business risk identification
Q1:
Pandemic- Fever
Legal-
Environmental changes
Security
Staffing
Suppliers
Market
Utilities and services
ASSESSMENT 2A
Business risks identified Potential harm Category of risk 1. Level of Location Worst- Who was
ic Social
Legal
Technol
ogy
Risk priority
Likelihood
Procedu
Severity
re
Food spoils and they H H 2 Industrial unit Increased costs Engineers and
Industrial fridge goes will be unable to feed Property and and consumers mechanics
food
Business risks identified Potential harm Category of risk 1. Level of Location Worst- Who was
consequences Econom
Risk priority scenario ?
Likelihood
ic Social
Severity
Legal
Technol
ogy
Procedu
re
Both fresh food suppliers Lack of suppliers H H 2 Inventory department Decrease in New suppliers of
goes out of order Supplier
amount of stock fresh food
staff or
ordering stock
Shop and stock is H H 1 Store outlet Loss of stock and Damage control
Storm surge from nearby damaged, is unusable Natural disaster damage of shop and maintenance
repaired
Business risks identified Potential harm Category of risk 1. Level of Location Worst- Who was
ic Social
Severity
Legal
Technol
ogy
Procedu
re
The juice bar will H H 1 Nearby location No customer will Research and
monopoly on
customers
Juice bar will be H H 2 Organisation premises Legal expenses Legal authority
Customer is injured,
fined, have to pay will increase of the
Worksafe investigation
legal expenses and Legal leading to organisation
ensues and possible
potentially go out of insolvency
legal action
business
ASSESSMENT 2B – SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS
4. Juice suppliers and delivery persons are considered as external stakeholders (Kardes et al. 2013)
5. Lack of raw materials and increase in the manufacturing costs of the products
Assessment 3 Project
Q1:
Q1:
Severity of Risks
Members leave the organization High
ASSESSMENT 3
shortage
Destruction by the occurrence 4 High 3
of flood
shops
Stakeholders
Q1:
Contractors External
Supplier External
Q2:
The area of risk management will be dealt by the stake holders only after the formation of a certain plan. The discussion will produce
A.
Who must you communicate risk treatments to and ways that you might communicate them?
The risk treatment must be communicated with the several posts of personalities spread around in all the sectors of work. This people
include the external people such as contractors, suppliers to internal ones such as managers
There are several ways to communicate with them. Several training sessions along with interactive sessions and seminars may help the
cause
Keen observations along with analysis of the data are the finest way to do this.
The updated file must be stored from time to time for the company benefits and future prospects (Teller and Kock, 2013).
ASSESSMENT 5
company ty
Investigation Healthcare
Injury of workers
regarding the
injury Health and Production Efficiency is
leading to
bad name of safety issues reduced
the company
Damage to Property Store Stock and others Higher
Fire outrage
the outlet issue
will be damaged authorities
Unable to use tap water Water management Hampering the Engineering
Water shortage
Peripherals making of food department
legal
department
damages other
peripheral
departments
for helping
company will be
affected a lot.
Risk matrix
shortage
of flood
Shortage of workers 3 Low 1
shops
Assessment Task 1B: Question
Q1:
Risks Solutions
Opening of New juice bar Branding must be focused on to attract the consumers
Fire outrage Fire management will have to step in and take action
Flood and damages Strategies must be devised such that no major damage
occurs
Shortage of water Tanks and reservoirs must be installed for efficient water
supply.
Issue with the juicers Technical support must be provided for such a situation
Supplier absentee Healthy relation with the suppliers help in developing the
supply chain
Injury of worker First aid should be provided with proper focus on the health
of the worker
Q2:
control
Suppliers Collection of Bob 10th phone Business constraints Bonding with the
stopped
supplying data February suppliers
New reservoirs Simon 1st Water reservation Workers not present in office Analysis of water
Shortage
must be March authority and degradation of food. sample
of water
installed
Consumer must Christian 10th Health and safety Lack of concentration of Customer
done
Q3:
The communication can be done by John through several meetings with higher level authorities. The managers and other employees
may be able to help John as well. The contractors, suppliers may also be of use in this case. The conduction of effective sessions and
Q4:
The health of the workers ensures the work environment and safe running of the company. He must introduce new machines and water
equipments along with safety procedures to deal with any kind of risks (Yun et al. 2013).
Q5:
Q1:
The treatment of all types and kinds of problems and risks are done by this and the solution is devised.
Q2:
Q1: Who is the company/organisation? What is included in the scope of this risk management plan?
Opportunities:
Identification
Efficient observation
Keeping records
Q3: How are risks identified and analysed according to this plan?
The plan is meant to analyze the kind of risks that can cause hindrance to the natural flow of work and put constraints in the work
Q5: Who is responsible for each part of the risk management process?
The main responsibility is on the audit and risk management committee for the said job. The next department will be the members of
executives are senior in the company followed by the documentation done by the planning committee. The managers will be given
A span of 6 years or more is allotted for the further review and analysis.
Q7: What is the process used to organize and store risk management documentation? If this is not detailed, what do you
The analysis of all the data are efficiently carried out by the management system for documents (Jahanshahi and Brem, 2017).
ASSESSMENT 6
Q1:
shortage solutions
the suppliers
shops forward
Assessment Task 4.2 Risk treatment action plan
Q1:
Solution Necessary
responsible factor
Security Review for risk Abraham 2nd Internet Problems regarding economy Any one of the
Installation of Review for risk Simon 1st Equipments of security Workers being absent Efficient Checking
Issues Review for risk Christian Continu Equipments of security Plants not having tags Efficient Checking
regarding management ed
stock arrival
Assessment Task 4.3 Risk treatment communication plan
Q1:
Stakeholders
Solution to Risk Interaction Date
interaction
groups
arrival
Q1:
management
management
management
Issues for the arrival of Review for risk Management of inventory Daily
stock management
Q1:
accessing
identification
interaction
management team
Q2:
Updating the files by a certain period of time is the most necessary thing of all. The records must be preserved with the names and
Q3:
The level of risks will determine the amount of focus the company gives on it. The risks will be analyzed based on the hierarchy of the
risks planned by the company. The process will be analyzed by first devising an effective strategy for breaking down the risk followed
by the plan for resisting the risk. The last stage will be the analysis and evaluation (Rezapouraghdam et al. 2018).
References
Baxter, R., Bedard, J.C., Hoitash, R. and Yezegel, A., 2013. Enterprise risk management program quality: Determinants, value
relevance, and the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1264-1295.
Bolton, P., Chen, H. and Wang, N., 2013. Market timing, investment, and risk management. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1),
pp.40-62.
Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A. and Rustambekov, E., 2015. Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research
directions. Long range planning, 48(4), pp.265-276.
Cole, S., Giné, X., Tobacman, J., Topalova, P., Townsend, R. and Vickery, J., 2013. Barriers to household risk management: Evidence
from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), pp.104-35.
Dionne, G., 2013. Risk management: History, definition, and critique. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 16(2), pp.147-166.
Edwards, E. and Burns, A., 2015. Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainability. Elt Journal, 70(1), pp.6-15.
Jahanshahi, A.A. and Brem, A., 2017. Sustainability in SMEs: Top management teams behavioral integration as source of
innovativeness. Sustainability, 9(10), p.1899.
Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S.T. and Cavusgil, E., 2013. Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk
management. International Business Review, 22(6), pp.905-917.
McNeil, A.J., Frey, R. and Embrechts, P., 2015. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools-revised edition.
Princeton university press.
Oke, A., 2015. Workplace waste recycling behaviour: A meta-analytical review. Sustainability, 7(6), pp.7175-7194.
Rezapouraghdam, H., Alipour, H. and Arasli, H., 2018. Workplace spirituality and organization sustainability: a theoretical
perspective on hospitality employees’ sustainable behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp.1-19.
Soin, K. and Collier, P., 2013. Risk and risk management in management accounting and control.
Teller, J. and Kock, A., 2013. An empirical investigation on how portfolio risk management influences project portfolio
success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), pp.817-829.
Yun, R., Scupelli, P., Aziz, A. and Loftness, V., 2013, April. Sustainability in the workplace: nine intervention techniques for behavior
change. In International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 253-265). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.