Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. INTRODUCTION
0018-9480/91/0800-1307$01.00 01991 I E E E
1308 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 39, NO. 8, AUGUST 1991
- - -f2
k = - =M- - - -f," (1)
L f,"+f2.
(a) By placing a PEC or a PMC in the midway plane of the
coupling waveguide, only half the structure, shown in Fig.
PEC or PMC
3(b), together with the coordinates and definition of geo-
metric parameters, needs to be analyzed. The plane z =
- c can be either a PEC or a PMC. The mode matching
method can be used to analyze the structure in Fig. 3(b),
i.e., to calculate f, (with PEC at the center) and f, (with
PMC at the center). Then (1) is used to obtain the
coupling coefficient, k . The half-sections in Fig. 3(b) are
C+l, -4 divided into two regions:
Topview Sideview
(b) Region I: z 2 0, the cavity.
Fig. 3. (a) The conventional (left)and the new (right) coupling method. Region 11: z < 0, the coupling waveguide.
(b) the configuration under analysis.
Within each region, both T E modes and TM modes
(transverse to the z direction) are used to match the
boundary at z = 0. The H, fields for the TE modes are,
for region I,
I
lopen or Short
Circuit
sin y/;( z
sinh y(,:
+ c)
sinh y&,l,
1, - z)
(2)
PEC
sinh yi'jlc '
11. ANALYSIS
(3)
The new coupling method introduces a short coupling cosh y:;( z + c)
waveguide of smaller cross section that replaces the cross
, PMC.
cosh y:;c
iris. The comparison is shown in Fig. 3(a). The small
coupling waveguide between the two dual-mode rectangu- The E, fields for the TM modes are, for region I,
lar cavities is beyond cutoff over the desired band of the 1
cosh yk,( I, - 2 )
filter such that only evanescent modes can exist. There
are three parameters (i.e., the height, width, and length of
E$, =
""(
sin - x
1, ';) (:
+- sin - y
'
+ -I) coshy~,l,
the coupling waveguide) that can be varied to achieve the (4)
two prescribed couplings (i.e., M I , and M 2 J . Therefore,
the choice of dimensions is very flexible. These dimen- and for region 11,
sions can be adjusted to meet geometric specifications.
For the purpose of the analysis, the dual orthogonal mode
pairs in each of the two cavities are assumed to be
uncoupled (i.e., no 45" coupling screws are present). With cosh y/j( z +c )
this assumption, only the modes of similar polarization in
, PEC
cosh y,"c
each cavity are coupled, and thus can be analyzed sepa- (5)
rately. Two equivalent circuits of the coupling structure sinh y!(,: z + e)
, PMC.
for one mode in each cavity are shown in Fig. 4, where M sinh y,:'c
is the mutual inductance. There are two resonant fre-
quencies for these circuits, namely f, and f,. They can Notice that for TE modes, m or n can be zero, while for
be derived from the symmetry of the structure by placing TM modes both m and n must be positive. The trans-
a perfect electric conductor (PEC) or a perfect magnetic verse fields can be derived from the axial field compo-
conductor (PMC) on the symmetry plane respectively. nents through Maxwell's equations. In all the equations
CHANG AND ZAKI: EVANESCENT-MODE COUPLING 1309
above = j w p and E^ = j w e , p and E being the perme- composed of all the mode coefficients in region 11. The
ability and permittivity of the medium within the struc- rank of the square matrix is the total number of modes
ture. taken (the sum of the number of T E and TM modes) in
On the plane z = 0, the boundary condition requires region 11. In order to be able to handle it numerically, the
both the transverse electric fields ( E , and E,) and the infinite matrix in (12) has to be truncated. For example, if
transverse magnetic fields ( H x and H,) to be continuous, the m and n in (2) take NzE and N;F" different values,
i.e., respectively, and the m and n in (4) take NEM and NzM
values, then the summation in (12) would be over NEEX
Ai,Zk= BZ@;q (6) NTE+ NEMX NLM terms. And if the i and j in (3) take
m,n,p 17J2q
N$F and Nzy" different values, respectively, and the i and
+
j in ( 5 ) take N z y and N,TMvalues, then the rank of the
m,n,p
AR,H~= B ; $ I ~ (7) matrix would be NzF X NI,; +
.t: N ; f y X NITy".
Equation (12) is a homogeneous linear system of equa-
where the superscripts p and q stand for the TE mode or tions. In order to have a nonzero solution for the coeffi-
the TM mode. The A's and B's are th_e mode Sefficients cients, the determinant of the matrix in (12) must be zero.
in regions I and I1 respectively. The E's and H's are the The frequencies that satisfy this condition are the reso-
vector transverse fields at z = 0. nant frequencies. Both cases for a PEC and a PMC wall
Define the cross product of two modes as at the symmetry plane are calculated. They are used to
( E'.X 2
1 )= 1cross section
(E,"Hi -Ey"H:)dA. (8)
obtain the coupling coefficients from (1). We can substi-
tute the frequency back into (12) to solve for the coeffi-
cients, and then the field distribution inside the cavity is
From the 2rthogo2ality of eigenmodes, it is known that if
obtained.
both the E and H fields in (8) are in the same region, all
the products vanish unless U and U are the same mode.
111. RESULTS
Taking the cross product of the H field of some mode in
region I on both sides of (6) and the cross product of the A program has been developed for the calculation of
E field of some mode in region I1 on both sides of (7) and the coupling coefficient and field distributions. The total
using the orthogonality relation (81, the following equa- fields existing in the resonator at resonance are a combi-
tions are obtained: nation of TE and TM modes. Therefore, these fields
cannot strictly be designated as pure TE or TM modes
ALn(ZLXG2)= BZ(E#';qXI?2) (9) and are designated as hybrid (HE) modes. However, for
i,J,q calculating the coupling between the two cavities using
the small-aperture approximation, the TE,, mode is as-
C X 22)= BZ(@,'q x @;Iq). (10) sumed to be the only mode existing in the cavities. The
m,n,p approximate coupling is computed from [7], [81
Substituting the A;, from (9) into (10) gives
I +
B; ( @,'q x 22)
where A is the free-space wavelength and A, is the cutoff
wavelength inside the coupling waveguide. M is the mag-
netic polarizability of the aperture. Figs. 5 and 6 show the
variation of the coupling coefficient between two cavities
as a function of half the coupling section length (c). In
addition to the measured and computed results using the
or, in matrix form, mode matching method, the figures also show the approx-
imated small-aperture coupling coefficient. Conventional
coupling measurement methods carry measurement error,
inherent in these methods and hardware limitations. We
have essentially eliminated these errors by using the re-
flection coefficient phase measurement method [lo]. In
this method the frequencies of the zeros and poles of the
one-port network (i.e., the 180" and 0" phases of the
reflection coefficient) are accurately measured. The cou-
where unprimed indices i, j , and q are for the columns pling coefficient is determined only from frequency mea-
and the primed ones are for the rows. The 8's are the surements. Since a synthesizer is used as the source,
Kronecker delta function. The ( B e ) is a column vector frequency measurement errors are essentially eliminated,
1310
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 39, NO. 8, AUGUST 1991
E:
3
X
7.i
8.5
I
p1
0
3
- a=.5"
X
3
50 -
L I
0 0
.05 .15 .2
2 4 8 8
c (inch)
Fig. 5. b/lz
Comparison of measured coupling coefficient with calculated
from different approaches (HEol mode). Fig. 7. Variation of resonant frequencies (f, and f,,, mode) and
coupling coefficients with coupling waveguide length a .
8.4 q , , , , , , , , , , , , I ,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,
70 -
>\
- calculation
---- small aperture approx. -
60 - -
0 experiment
50 - - 7.8
50 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
~ b=.5"
b=.4"
.___.
..
b=.3"
b=.2"
D
___---
__-- - __._____._------
-
_____.____-------- -
{ o 05 .15 .2
2 4 8 8 I
c (inch)
Fig. 6. Comparison of measured coupling coefficient with calculated Fig. 8. Variation of resonant frequencies (f, and f, mode) and
from different approaches (HE,, mode). coupling coefficients with coupling waveguide length b.
CHANG AND ZAKI: EVANESCENT-MODE COUPLING 131 1
Region I
1
l o0o086[ ;ooo2[
i
9999 1
1/n
1
511
REF -10.0 dB
5 . 0 dB/
log M m
filters,” IEEE Trans. Microwaue Theory Tech., vol. MTT-30, pp.
1311-1316, Sept. 1982.
[4] K. A. Zaki, C. Chen, and A. E . Atia, “Canonical and longitudinal
dual mode dielectric resonator filters without iris,” IEEE Trans.
Microwaue Theory Tech., vol. MTT-35, pp. 1130-1135, Dec. 1987.
s2 I [5] S. W. Chen, K. A. Zaki, and A. E. Atia, “ A single iris 8-pole dual
mode dielectric resonator filter,” in Proc. 19th European Microware
OdB S I 1
Conf.,Sept. 1989, pp. 513-518.
-5dB [61 S. W. Chen and K. A. Zaki, “ A novel coupling method for dual
mode dielectric resonators or waveguide filters,” IEEE Trans. Mi-
-10dB crowace Theory Tech., vol. 38, pp. 1885-1893, Dec. 1990.
[7] H . A. Bethe, “Theory of diffraction by small holes,” Phys. Ret.., vol.
-15dB
66, pp. 163-182, 1944.
-2OdB [81 G. L. Matthaei, L. Young, and E. M. T. Jones, Microwai,e Filters,
Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, ch. 8, pp. 229-243.
[91 P. H. Masterman and P. J. B. Clarricoats, “Computer field-match-
ing of waveguide transverse discontinuities,” Proc. Inst. Elrc. Eng.,
vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 51-63, Jan. 1971.
1.63 7.67 7.71 7.75 7.79 7.83 7.87 7.91 7.95 7.99 8.03GHz [lo] A. E. Atia and A. E. Williams, “Measurements of intercavity
couplings,” IEEE Trans. Microwar’e Theory Tech., vol. MTT-23, pp.
Fig. 12. Measured response for the experimental filter: Si, and S2i. 519-522, June 1975.