Department of Mechanical

Engineering

Progress Presentation# 01
“Development of Sliding Wear Test Setup”
Project Team Members
Nasir Habib ME151005
Muhammad Usman Rafique ME151029
Usama Tariq ME151030
Muhammad Asim Naeem ME151052
Abdul Haleem Khuram ME151054
Supervisor
Engr. Muhammad Ahmad 1
 Problem Formulation

Objective

Outline Methodology

Progress/Readings/Measurement

Remaining Work

2
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Developing of Sliding Wear Test Rig to Meet the Need

of Lab Apparatus at Low Cost and Locally Available
Materials
To increase the reliability of parts in friction and the
life cycle of tools
To Save the Energy Losses due to wear

3
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Objective
 Development of Sliding Wear Test Rig

 Wear Behavior of Different Materials (Aluminum,

Cast Iron, steel)

 Anti-Wear Behavior of Different Lubricants

4
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Authors Findings Research Title

Tribology: friction and Wear of

I. Heching and P. Shipway  Effect of Load on wear
Engineering Materials

 Effect of Contact Area on Wear Engineering Tribology

B. Andrew , G. Stchowiak
 Archard wear Equation (Book)

 Lubrication Regimes
Boundary Lubrication and
S. Hironaka  Stribeck Curve
lubricants
 Hersey Number

5
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Authors Findings Research Title

Effects of Bio Diesel Blends on

 Tribology & Corrosion Test
M. Gulzar et al. Lubricating oil Degradation and
Methodology
Piston Assembly Energy Losses

Chapter 08: Measurement of Wear

Caroline Richard  Wear test Standards and Friction Resistance of Bulk and
Coted Materials

A Rig Test to Measure Friction and

 Holding Devices wear of Heavy duty diesel Engines
John J. Truhan
 Piston Ring and Liner Wear Test Piston rings and Cylinder Liner
using Realistic Lubricants

6
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

System Description
Connecting
Control Unit Ac Motor Crank
Rod

Ball/Pin
Sliding Plate Oil Bath Load Arm
Holder

Gauge
Load Hanger Fixed Plate Frame
Holder

6
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Solid Works Model Oil Sump Crank

Connecting
Load Arm
Rod
Ac Motor

Fixed Plate

Frame

8
9
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Test Methodology
Tribological Test
Required Machining of Specimen
Washing of Specimen(Ultra-sonic Bath)
Establish a Contact Between Specimens(Using Test Rig)
Continue Running for Specific Time
Find Wear(Using Weight Loss Method)
Compare the Results
10
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Test Methodology
Tribological Test
Dry Test
Without Using Lubricants
Lubricated Test
Using Following Lubricants
SN 10W-40
SN 5W-30
SF/CF 20W-50
M. Gulzar et al., “Effects of biodiesel blends on lubricating oil degradation and piston 11
assembly energy losses,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 713–721, Sep. 2016.
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Corrosive Test
Conduct for checking the Corrosiveness nature of
different Lubricant oil
Abrading of specimen
Washing of Specimen
Measuring the Weight
Immersion of Specimen in Oil for specific Time
Washing and Measuring the Weight
8.76×109 𝑤
Corrosion Rate =
𝐷𝑡𝐴
M. Gulzar et al., “Effects of biodiesel blends on lubricating oil degradation and piston 12
assembly energy losses,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 713–721, Sep. 2016.
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Theoretical Equation for Wear

Archard’s wear Equation
𝐾𝑊𝑠
𝑉=
𝐻
V=Total Volume of wear Debris produced
K=Dimensionless Constant
W=Total Normal load
s=Sliding Distance
H=Hardness of the Contact Surfaces
13
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Experimental Progress
Calculation of Total Sliding Distance
𝑠 = 2𝐿 × 𝑁 × 𝑇
s=Total Sliding Distance
L=Length of Stroke
N=RPM of Crank
T= Total Time

14
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Experimental Progress
Calculations
Total Sliding Distance
𝑠 = 2𝐿 × 𝑁 × 𝑇
175
𝑠 = 2 0.06 × 7200
60
𝑠 = 2520𝑚
Mass of Specimen = 26.1125 𝑔 = 0.0261125 𝑘𝑔
Volume of Specimen = 𝑉 = 8.46504 × 10−6 𝑚3
𝑚 𝑘𝑔
Density of Meterial = 𝜌 = = 3084.74
𝑉 𝑚3 15
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Experimental Progress
∆𝑤
𝜌
Specific Wear Rate =
𝑃×𝑠
∆𝑤 = Weight Loss during Test = 26.1125 𝑔 − 25.293
= 0.8195𝑔 = 8.195 × 10−4 𝑘𝑔
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = Density of Material = 3084.74 3
𝑚
𝑃 = Applied Load During Test= 2𝑁 = 0.2𝐾𝑔
s = Total Sliding Distance = 2520𝑚
Alotaibi, J., Yousif, B., & Yusaf, T. (2014). Wear behaviour and mechanism of different metals sliding against stainless steel
counterface. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 228(6), 692– 16
704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650114527072
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Experimental Progress
Specific Wear Rate
8.195 × 10−4
𝑆. 𝑊. 𝑅 = 3084.74
0.2 × 2520
3
𝑚
= 5.27108 × 10−10
𝑘𝑔. 𝑚

𝑚𝑚3
= 0.5271
𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
17
 Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements

Next Plan Work

Two different Holders

Testing

ANSYS Work

MATLAB Work
18
 Thanks…
Any Question?

19