Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Reinforced Concrete Wall Design Report

MATERIAL AND DESIGN DATA


Load Allowance = 10 %
Code of Practice fcu (N/mm²) Ec, (N/mm²) fy (N/mm²) fyv (N/mm²) γc γs
BS8110 : 1997 30 24597 460 460 1.5 1.05

Cover (mm) Conc. Unit Weight (kN/m³) Steel Unit Weight (kg/m³)
25 24 7860

Design Calculation for RC Wall 1B (Core 1)


Wall Panel Thickness, t = 200 mm

Sub Panel 1 (Reg. 1)


Location in Panel: Wall Zone
Sub-Panel Length, b = 1850 mm | Gross Concrete Area, Ac = b × t = 370000 mm²
Design Status: Pass

Reaction Table (3D) for RC Wall 1C/C-C1 Region 1


Reaction Edge Loading Source P Mx My Vx Vy X M
Dead Load 101.8 0.9 -1.6 -28.9 1.7 -753.2 -27.7
Top Edge
Live Load 26.1 0.4 -0.7 -16.0 0.8 -427.7 -15.6
Dead Load 135.6 0.5 3.9 -29.5 -2.4 1210.8 25.2
Bottom Edge
Live Load 20.1 0.0 1.7 -16.7 -0.7 1799.9 15.6
P - Axial Load (kN), Mx, My - Bending Moment About X-X / Y-Y Axis (kNm), Vx, Vy - Shear Force Along X-X / Y-Y Axis (kN)
X - Eccentricity of Axial Load from Left Reference of Section (mm), M - Moment by Eccentricity of Axial Load (kNm) where M = P × (Panel Length / 2 - X)
Sign of Top Edge Reactions have been reversed to be comparable to bottom edge
Loadings listed above does not consider load allowance of 10% specified by user

Sub-Frame 2D Analysis Result (Mx) for RC Wall 1C/C-C1Sub Panel 1 (Reg. 1)


Current Floor: 1B, Zone Length = 1850 mm
No. Floor Length Loc. D.L. L.L. Min. Max.
Top 0.27 0.11 0.55 0.69
1 1B 2050
Bot 0.76 0.21 1.40 1.40
Length - Distance of the first node to the last node of the 2D SubFrame Panel/Group Mesh (mm), Loc. - Location of Result (Top or Bottom of the Panel)
D.L., L.L. - Dead / Live Load Moment from Plan Sub-Frame Analysis (kNm)
Min., Max. - Minimum/Maximum Gravity Pattern Loading from Plan Sub-Frame Analysis (kNm)

Lower Floor: GB, Zone Length = 1850 mm


No. Floor Length Loc. D.L. L.L. Min. Max.
Top -0.07 -0.06 -0.20 -0.47
1 1B 2050
Bot -0.39 -0.34 -1.10 -1.72
Length - Distance of the first node to the last node of the 2D SubFrame Panel/Group Mesh (mm), Loc. - Location of Result (Top or Bottom of the Panel)
D.L., L.L. - Dead / Live Load Moment from Plan Sub-Frame Analysis (kNm)
Min., Max. - Minimum/Maximum Gravity Pattern Loading from Plan Sub-Frame Analysis (kNm)

Wall Panel 3D Analysis Result for Sub Panel 1 (Reg. 1)


Loading Reaction Load Mx
No P Mx My Vx Vy X M Process
Source Edge Comb. (Ecc)
1 G.L. B.E. LC1 244.3 -1.9 9.0 -74.8 -4.9 1296.2 66.2 2.4 Design
2 G.L. B.E. Min 149.2 -1.9 4.2 -32.5 -2.6 1210.8 27.7 1.5 Analysis
3 G.L. T.E. LC1 202.7 2.0 -3.7 -72.8 4.0 679.4 -70.1 2.0 Analysis
4 G.L. T.E. Min 112.0 1.0 -1.8 -31.8 1.9 753.2 -30.4 1.1 Analysis
Loading Source - G.L. for Gravity, W.L. for Wind Load, N.L. for Notional Load, S.L. for Seismic Load
Gravity Load Mx always uses greater of (3D, 2D Pattern Loading), Reaction Edge - Top Edge(T.E.) or Bottom Edge(B.E.)
Load Comb. - User Specified Load Combination in parameter, Min for minimum gravity load (1.0DL)
P - Axial Load (kN), Mx / My - Design Bending Moment About X-X / Y-Y Axis (kNm), Vx / Vy - Design Shear Force In X-X / Y-Y Axis (kN)
X - Eccentricity of Axial Load from Left Reference of Section (mm), M - Moment by Eccentricity of Axial Load (kNm) where M = P × (Panel Length / 2 - X)
Mx(Ecc) - Moment due to Minimum Eccentricity (emin) about wall minor axis (kNm)
Process - Process of Applied Loadings (Design/Analysis)
Load allowance of 10% has been added specified by user
Wall Zone Braced/Unbraced and Short/Slender Condition Table for RC Wall Sub Panel 1 (Reg. 1)
Wall Clear Height, lo = 3600 mm
Loading Braced/
No. P Vy ∆y Qy Short/ Slender
Source Unbraced
1 G.L. - - - - Braced Short
2 G.L.(Min) - - - - Braced Short
3 G.L. - - - - Braced Short
4 G.L.(Min) - - - - Braced Short
Loading Source - G.L. Gravity, W.L. for Wind Load, N.L. for Notional Load, S.L. for Seismic Load
P - Axial Force (kN), Vy - Shear Force in Wall Panel Local Y-Y Axis (kN)
∆y - RC. Wall Drift in Local Y-Y Axis (mm), Qy - RC. Wall Stability Index in Local Y-Y Axis (Q = P × ∆ / V × h)
Braced/Unbraced - RC. Wall Braced/Unbraced Condition in Local Y-Y Axis (mm), Limit Value = 0.05
Short/Slender - RC. Wall Short/Slender Condition in Local Y-Y Axis (mm)
All Gravity Load Cases Assigned as Braced regardless the Stability Index

Wall Zone Slenderness Limit Check


Wall Clear Height, lo = 3600 mm
Top Element Stiffness, KeTop = ∑KsTop + ∑KbTop + ∑KtwTop = 10659375.0 mm³
Bottom Element Stiffness, KeBot = ∑KsBot + ∑KbBot + ∑KtwBot = 7701358.7 mm³
Wall Stiffness, Kw = 4111111.1 mm³

Restraint Elements at the top part of wall zone


Elememt
No. Mark Width a, mm Depth b, mm Length L, mm Angle α, ° K
Type
1 Slab FS203:1 1025 150 1000 90.0 1729688
2 Slab FS257:1 1025 150 1000 90.0 1729688
3 Beam 1B39(230x600) - 1 230 600 6900 90.0 3600000
4 TWall C/1C-2A 200 3600 5000 90.0 933120000
5 TWall C1/1C-2A 200 3600 5000 90.0 933120000
K = 0 when the element is skipped from computation of restrain condition, please refer to the technical documentation
K = |Sin α| × [a × b³ / (12 × L)]

Restraint Elements at the bottom part of wall zone


Elememt
No. Mark Width a, mm Depth b, mm Length L, mm Angle α, ° K
Type
1 Slab FS191:1 2050 150 6900 90.0 501359
2 Beam GB33(230x600) - 1 230 600 6900 90.0 3600000
3 TWall C/1C-2A 200 4500 5000 90.0 1822500000
4 TWall C1/1C-2A 200 4500 5000 90.0 1822500000
K = 0 when the element is skipped from computation of restrain condition, please refer to the technical documentation
K = |Sin α| × [a × b³ / (12 × L)]

Effective Length Factor, β for Braced Condition


Relative Stiffness at Top of Element, αTop = 0.386
Relative Stiffness at Bottom of Element, αBot = 0.534
β1 = 0.7 + 0.05 × (αTop + αBot) = 0.75, β2 = 0.85 + 0.05 × Min (αTop, αBot) = 0.87
β = Min (β1, β2) = 0.75 < 1.0

Effective Length Factor, β for Unbraced Condition


Relative Stiffness at Top of Element, αTop = 0.386
Relative Stiffness at Bottom of Element, αBot = 0.534
β1 = 1.0 + 0.15 × (αTop + αBot) = 1.14, β2 = 2.0 + 0.3 × Min (αTop, αBot) = 2.12
β = Min (β1, β2) = 1.14

Wall Effective Height for Braced Condition, le = ßBraced × lo = 2700 mm


Wall Effective Height for Unbraced Condition, le = ßUnbraced × lo = 4104 mm
Clause 3.9.3.7.2 Limits of slenderness
Slenderness Ratio for braced condition le / h = 2700.0 / 200 = 13.5 ≤ 40 ← Checking for slenderness upper limit pass

Slenderness Result (Using Load Case Region 1 Load 1)


Lateral Force, V = 0, Use Stability Index Q = 0 for Gravity Load, The Element is Braced
Slenderness Ratio, sr = Leff / t = 2700.0 / 200 = 13.5 < 15 → The Wall is Short About X-X Axis
Design load selected is short (not slender), no slenderness iteration table and calculation will be shown

Loading Data
Design Loading Selected from Region 1 Load No. 1
Loading / Loadings from 3D Analysis Result
Loading Type Reaction Edge Load Comb. P Mx My Vx Vy X M
G.L. B.E. 1 244.3 -1.9 9.0 -74.8 -4.9 1296.2 66.2
Loading Type - Source of Loading (Gravity, Wind Load, Notional Load)
Reaction Edge - Top Edge(T.E.) or Bottom Edge(B.E.), Load Comb. - User Specified Load Combination
P - Axial Load (kN), Mx, My - Design Bending Moment About X-X / Y-Y Axis (kNm), Vx, Vy - Design Shear Force In X-X / Y-Y Axis (kN)
X - Eccentricity of Axial Load from Left Reference of Section (mm), M - Moment by Eccentricity of Axial Load (kNm) where M = P × (Panel Length / 2 - X)
Load allowance of 10% has been added specified by user

Sub-Panel Applied Axial Force, F = 244.3 kN


Sub-Panel Axial Force Capacity, FCap = 3615.2 kN

Sub-Panel Applied Moment About X-X Axis, Mx = 2.4 kNm


Sub-Panel Moment Capacity About X-X Axis, MxCap = 36.2 kNm

Sub-Panel Applied Moment About Y-Y Axis, My = 75.2 kNm


Sub-Panel Moment Capacity About Y-Y Axis, MyCap = 1113.6 kNm

Wall Sub-Panel Analysis/Design Passed


Vertical Reinforcement Provided: 14T12-300 (0.43%)

Shear Design and Checking Calculation


Basic Shear Design Data for Sub-Panel
H = 1850.0 mm, B = 200.0 mm, Concrete Cover, cov = 25 mm
Vertical Bar Diameter, ΦV = 12 mm, Horizontal Bar Diameter, ΦH = 10 mm
Effective Depth for Shear Design, d = H - cov - ΦH - ΦV / 2 = 1809.0 mm
Design Shear Force, V = 74.8 kN, Bending Moment, M = 2.0 kNm, Axial Force, N = 244.3 kN

Shear Stress, νss = V × 1000 / (b × d) = 74.8 × 1000 / (200.0 × 1809.0) = 0.21 N/mm²

Maximum Shear Stress Allowed, νMax = Min (0.8 × √30, 5) = 4.38 N/mm² - Clause 3.4.5.2
Shear Stress, νss = V × 1000 / (b × d) = 74.8 × 1000 / (200.0 × 1809.0) = 0.21 N/mm² ≤ νMax (4.38 N/mm²)
Checking for Maximum Shear Stress Allowed Pass

- Table 3.8: Values of νc, design concrete shear stress


Steel Percentage, 100 × As / (bv × d) = 0.15 % ≤ 3.0 %
0.15% of steel is used for calculation of compressive member
Effective Depth Ratio, edr = 400 / d = 400 / 1809.0 = 0.221
(400 / d)^ ¼ = 0.686 < 1, (400 / d)^ ¼ taken as 1
Minimum fcu, fcuMin = 25 N/mm², Concrete Grade Ratio, Min(fcu, 40) / fcuMin = 30 / 25 = 1.200
Concrete Shear Capacity, νc = 0.79 {100 As / (bv d)}⅓ (400 / d)¼ (fcu / 25)⅓ / γm
= 0.79 × {0.15}⅓ × 1.000 × (1.200)⅓ / 1.25 = 0.36 N/mm²
Clause 3.4.5.12: eqn. 6a
VhM Ratio = V × h / M = 74809 × 1850.0 / 2043431 = 67.73 > 1.00, VhM Ratio taken as 1.00
Design Shear Capacity, νc1' = νc + 0.60 × (N / Ac) × VhM = 0.357 + 0.60 × (244253.2 / 370000.0) × 1.00 = 0.753 N/mm²
Clause 3.4.5.12: eqn. 6b
Design Shear Capacity, νc2' = νc × SQRT[(1 + N / (Ac × νc)] = 0.357 × SQRT[(1 + 244253.2 / (370000.0) × 0.36] = 0.602 N/mm²
Select νc2' as νc' for design

Minimum Design Shear Stress, νMin = 0.40 N/mm²


νss = 0.207 < νc' + 0.4, Provides only minimum link
Design for minimum Shear Stress, νd = νmin = 0.40 N/mm²
Shear Link Area / Spacing Ratio, SAsv_Sv = (vd × b) / (fyy × fy) = (0.40 × 200) / (0.95 × 460) = 0.183 mm²/mm
Using link diameter ΦH = 10 mm (SAsv = 157.1 mm²) and spacing, Sv = 300 mm
SAsv_SvProv = SAsvProv / Sv = 157.1 / 300 = 0.524 mm²/mm ≥ SAsv_Sv (0.183 mm²/mm)
Provided 2 X 12T10-300, Shear Checking / Design Passed

Total horizontal steel area provided, AsProv(H) = 24 × 78.5 = 1885 mm²


Minimum steel percentage required, AsMin = 0.01 × 0.25 × (3600 × 200) = 1800 mm² <= 1885, OK
Checking for horizontal steel percentage passed

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen