Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Keywords Charpy testing Hybrid blanket of the jute and malva
Composite Polyester matrix Notch toughness
Introduction
Natural fibers with high cellulose content, known as lignocellulosic fibers, become
firmly established as a potential replacement for the search field of synthetic fibers,
particularly glass fiber [1].
J. I. Margem (&)
Instituto de Ensino Superiores do Censa, ISECENSA, Rua Salvador Correa,
nº 139, Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro 28035-310, Brazil
e-mail: igormargem@gmail.com
Y. M. de Moraes F. M. Margem
LAMAV, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, UENF,
Av. Alberto Lamego, nº 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes 28013-602, Brazil
S. N. Monteiro
Instituto Militar de Engenharia, IME, Praça Gen. Tibúrcio, nº 80, Urca,
Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22290-270, Brazil
M. R. Margem
Universidade Federal Fluminense, UFF, Rua Miguel de Frias nº 9,
segundo andar, Icaraí, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 24220-900, Brazil
The use of natural fibers to replace the existing, present especially in aircraft and
cars, is motivated by several advantages such as good toughness and less abrasion
equipment used in processing composite [2–6].
Among these features is the low cost and lightweight. In addition, unlike the
glass fibers [7] lignocellulosic fibers are relatively flat and the processing proce-
dures produce less wear on equipment. The environmental issue is another point in
favor of natural fibers, which are renewable, recyclable, biodegradable and neutral
with regard to CO2 emissions [8, 9].
The incorporation of banana fibers in polymeric matrices of composite was 30
investigated [10, 11, 12] and found to have significant properties. These properties
31 are directly related to the microstructure of the fiber as well as the physical and
32 chemical characteristics present in any lignocellulosic fiber [13–17].
The objective of this study was a preliminary assessment through different
measures Charpy impact energy, together with the micro structural characteristics
associated with the fracture of polyester matrix composites with blanket of the jute
and malva fibers.
Experimental Procedure
The materials used in this work were blanket of the jute and malva fibers which was
Acquired by a producer, Pematec Triangel, from the Southeast region of Brazil
(Fig. 1).
The blanket comprises 40% jute fiber and 60% of Malva fiber. The fiber of jute
(Corchorus capsularis) is a vegetable textile fibers, this woody herb reaches 3–4 m
in height and its stalk is approximately 20 mm. It is used mainly in sacks industry,
due to resistance and strength of its fiber is also used in the furniture industry.
Table 1 shows the results of the values of Charpy impact energy with their
respective standard deviations for pure polyester and composites with up to two batt
layers.
Based on the results of Table 1, the change in Charpy impact energy with layers
of the blanket this shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
Table 1 Energy impact charpy for polyester matrix reinforced with blanket of the jute and malva
fibers
Layers of the blanket of jute and malva fibers Charpy impact energy (J/m)
0 22.9 ± 6.19
1 38.7 ± 28.96
2 58.9 ± 41.87
Fig. 3 Charpy impact energy as a function of the amount of blanket of the jute and malva fibers
Fig. 4 Macrostructural aspects of charpy impact rupture polyester matrix composites with net
polyester a one layers b and two layers c of the jute and malva blanket incorporated
Charpy Impact Test in Polyester Matrix Composites … 197
Conclusions
• Polyester matrix composites reinforced with jute and malva blanket, show a
linear increase in toughness as measured by Charpy impact test.
• Increase in toughness is apparently due to the low shear stress at the interface
between the blanket of jute and malva and polyester matrix.
• The increase energy absorbed due to propagation of longitudinal cracks through
the interface generates a larger fracture area when compared to the simple
transverse fracture.
• The incorporation of one or two layers of the blanket of jute and malva is
associated with incomplete specimens fracture due to the jute and malva fibers
that curves but no rupture during impact.
Acknowledgements The authors thank the support to this investigation by the Brazilian agencies:
CNPQ, CAPES, FAPERJ and TECNORTE/FERNORTE.
References
1. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose-based fibres. Prog Polym
Sci 24:221–274
2. Nabi Sahed D, Jog JP (1999) Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym
Technol 18:221–274
3. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and
biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276:1–24
4. Crocker J (2008) Natural materials innovative natural composites. Mater Technol 2–3(3):
174–178
5. Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Ferreira AS, Nascimento DCO (2009) Natural fiber polymer matrix
composites: cheaper, tougher and environmentally friendly. JOM 61(1):17–22
6. Gore A (2006) An inconvenient truth. The planetary emergency of global warming and what
we can do about it. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA
7. Peijs T (2000) Natural fibers based composites. Mater Technol 15:281–285
8. Wambua P, Ivens I, Verpoest I (2003) Natural fibers: can they replace glass and fiber
reinforced plastic? Compos Sci Technol 63:1259–1264
9. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable biocomposites from renewable
resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10:
19–26
10. Satyanarayana KG, Sukumaran K, Kulkarni AG, Pillai SKG, Rohatgi PK (1999) Fabrication
and properties of natural fibre-reinforced polyester composites. Composites 17:329–333
11. Callister WD Jr (2000) Materials science and engineering—an introduction, 5a Edição,
Wiley, Nova York
12. Fu SY, Lauke B, Mäder E, Hu X, Yue CY (1999) Fracture resistance of
short-glass-fiber-reinforced and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-propylene under charpy
impact load and dependence on processing. J Mater Process Technol 89–90:501–507
13. Leão AL, Tan IH, Caraschi JC (1998) Curaua fiber—a tropical natural fiber from Amazon—
potential and applications in composites. In: International conference on advanced
composites, Hurghada, Egito, Maio, 1998, pp 557–564
198 J. I. Margem et al.
14. Monteiro SN, Costa LL, Lopes FPD, Terrones LAH (2008) Characterization of the impact
resistance of coir fiber reinforced polyester composites. In: Mineral, metals & materials
characterization symposium—TMS conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, Março, 2008, pp 1–6
15. Yue CY, Looi HC, Quek MY (1995) Assessment of fibre-matrix adhesion and interfacial
properties using the pullout test. Int J Adhes Adhes 15:73–80
16. Margem JI, Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Ribeiro CG, Moraes Y (2017) Izod impact tests in
polyester matrix composites reinforced with blanket of the malva and jute fibers. In:
Characterization of minerals, metals, and materials—soft materials—TMS conference, San
Diego, CA, USA, February, 2017, pp 89–90
17. Margem JI, Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Ribeiro CG, Moraes Y (2016) Tensile strength tests
in epoxy composites with high incorporation of malva fibers. In: Characterization of minerals,
metals, and materials—composites—TMS 145th conference, Nashville, Tennessee, USA,
February, 2016, p 174
18. Margem JI, Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Ribeiro CG, Moraes Y (2015) Photoacoustic thermal
characterization of malva fibers. In: Characterization of minerals, metals, and materials—soft
materials—TMS 144th conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, March, 2015, pp 215–216
19. Margem JI, Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Margem M, Ribeiro CG, Gomes V (2015) Pullout
tests behavior of epoxy matrix reinforced with malva fibers. In: Characterization of minerals,
metals, and materials—soft materials—TMS 144th conference, Orlando, Florida, USA,
March, 2015, p 261
20. Margem JI Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Margem M, Gomes V (2014) Charpy impact tests in
epoxy matrix composites reinforced with malva fibers. In: Characterization of minerals,
metals, and materials—characterization of soft materials I—TMS 143rd conference, San
Diego Convention Center, California, USA, February, 2014, p 214