PART III

A. PLANNING WORKSHEET
After a series and thorough brainstorming and analysis of the School
Planning Team members, we have come-up with a school planning
worksheet derived from the results generated from the prioritized
school improvement areas of concern.

The plan is devised according to the three key outcomes that we need
to address in order to recognize these pressing prioritizations as stated
in our vision. These three concerns are ACCESS, QUALITY, and
GOVERNANCE.

The plan discloses the various programs, projects and activities of the
school to implement and finally reach to each general objective
according to three outcomes towards the realization of our desires
vision of improving every act driven to address priority improvement
areas (PIA).

Table 1 Planning Worksheet on access

B. PROJECT DESIGNS
Project Title: Absentism, No way!
Problem Statement: 2 or 3 dropout pupils have been recorded per
class at the end of school year.
Objective: To zero-out dropouts from 4% to 0% especially
those learners who are at risk with effective
and efficient school interventions
Root Cause: Lack of schooling interest due to poverty
PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX
Activity Output Date Person Budget Budget Source
Responsible
Advocacy/Information Attendance May SH P 500 MOOE
Dissemination Record Minutes to SPG
Posting of of Conferences June Teachers
Posters/Tarpaulin 2016 PTA
Making Brgy.
leaflets/Brochures Officials
Listing of beneficiaries List of June Teachers None None
beneficiaries 2016 Guidance
Designate
Adopt-a-Child List of adopted Jan to Teachers Expenses Personal budget
Program learners and their Dec. SH according from teachers
roles and 2016 to the
responsibilities school
needs of
learners
Sponsoring List of sponsors Jan. to Teachers Expenses Private/Personal
Stakeholders/Group and students Dec. Parents according
List of roles and 2016 SH to the
responsibilities Stakeholders school
needs of
learners
Home Visitation Accomplishment Jan. to Teachers P 500 Personal/MOOE
Check-up support Dec. Parents
2016 SH
Stakeholders
Recognition and Attendance Jan. to Teachers P 3,000 MOOE
Awards System for Record List of Dec. SPG, PTA
Best in Attendances Awardees 2016 SH
Stakeholders
Brgy.
Officials
Monitoring and M & E Tool June SH Teachers P 500 MOOE
Evaluation (Tool to
Provided) March
2016

Project Team Members: Omaira B. Ramalan

Rohani M. Macalawi
Aminah Mangadang
Nasrodin Ampaso
 Project Title: HES Enrolment, Increase!
Problem Statement: Enrolment over the past 3 school years has
decreased by 10% to 20%. In number
representation, around 10 to 15 pupils fails to
re-enroll ever beginning of classes
Objective: To increase enrollment rate from 1-% to 20%
additional learners
Root Cause: Household chores/Errand
Long distance
Weather condition

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Activity Output Date Person Budget Budget

Responsibl Source
e
Advocacy/Informati Attendance May to SH P 1,500 MOOE
on Dissemination Record June SPG
Posting of Minutes of 2016 Teachers
Posters/Tarpaulin Conferences PTA
Making Brgy.
leaflets/Brochures Officials
Early enrollment ACR List of Januar Teachers P 1,000 MOOE
campaign enrollees y 2016 SH
Adopt-a-Child List of Jan to Teachers Expense Persona
Program adopted Dec. SH s l budget
learners and 2016 accordin from
their roles and g to the teacher
responsibilitie school s
s needs of
learners
Intensive Guidance Forms Jan. to Teachers P 1,000 MOOE
Program List of Dec. Guidance
-Tracking system repeaters/Bali 2016 Designate
k-aral learners SH
Guidance
Office

Project Team Members: Alexander F. Cabaro

Omaira C. Ardiente
Jalilah M. Ibrahim
Ramlah A. Pasandalan
Sarah Mae Ermac
Project Title: Healthy and Bounty food Project
Problem Statement: 10 out of 20 pupils are weighed to be wasted
or severely wasted based on the school
nutritional status report submitted by teachers
Objective: To zero-out severely wasted and wasted
pupils from 144 to 0
Root Cause: Poor health condition
PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Activity Output Date Person Budget Budget

Responsible Source
Health Check- ACR July Division P 3,000 Brgy.
up/Health Stats 2016 Health IRA/PTA
Inventory Personnel funds
Brgy.
Health
Personnel
Nutritional BMI Report July Teachers P 1,200 MOOE
Status 2016 Nurse
Inventory
Classroom Hand Washing/ July Teachers P 2,000 MOOE
hand First-Aid 2016
washing/First- Corner
Aid Corner
Conduct of Letter No. of July Teachers P 1,500 MOOE
Deworming Dewormed 2016 Div.
Pupils Medical
Team
Herbal List of Herbal July Teachers P 1,000 MOOE
Gardening plants and uses 2016
log book
Sangkap Pinoy List of Canteen July Teachers P 5,000 Canteen
Foonds in the Foods Sales to Canteen
canteen Report Dec. SH
Suggestion Box 2016 Nurse
Sustainable Mortality of Jan. SH P 5,000 Canteen
School seeds No f to Teachers
Gardening/GPP harvest/products Dec. EPP
nursery 2016 4P’s
Members
Intensive SBFP Baseline/End Jan. SH SBFP SBFP funds
line Nutritional to Teachers funds
Status Report Dec. EPP
List of 2016 Parents
benefeciaries Nurse
Liquidation Volunteer
Report
Terminal
Report
 Monitoring and M and E Tool June EPP P 1,000 MOOE
Evaluation consolidated to Teachers
Result Dec. Nurse
ACR 2016

Project Team Members:

Omaira B. Ramalan
Rohani M. Macalawi
Aminah Mangadang
Nasrodin Ampaso

Project Title: Achievements Achieve!

Problem Statement: Periodical Test MPS has decreased over the
past three years
Objective: To increase Periodical Test and NAT MPS from
62.17% to at least 75% gradually
Root Cause: Poor study habits

Project Title: Project DEAR (Drop Everything and Read)

Problem Statement: 8% of the class population is non-readers, 20%
is in frustration level, and 45% is in instructional
level while only 27% is in independent level
Objective: To zero-out non-readers from 15% to 0% by the
end of school year
Root Cause: Lack of pupils’ reading interests/Poor reading
habits

Project Title: STOP BULLYING

Problem Statement: 2 out of 10 pupils is a victim of bullying in
classes
Objective: To zero-out bullying victims from 6% to 0%
Root Cause: Peer influence

Project Title: This is it. Let’s do it !!!

Problem Statement: Yearly, less than 5 participants of the school
place the three most coveted places in district
competition
Objective: To increase rank placement in district contest
from 3rd place to 1st place among schools
Root Cause: Lack pupils’ competence/ lack of basic
requirements

Project Title: Dasig Maestra sa Pag-eskwela

Problem Statement: Only 3 out of 15 teachers is currently enrolled
in graduate studies while most of them need
training on teaching strategies
Objective: To increase the number of teachers attending
professional courses from 3 to 15
Root Cause: Lack of teachers’ interest to enhance
professional growth

Project Title: Water ! Water ! for us

Problem Statement: No water connection in school
Objective: To install water connection
Root Cause: Lack of financial assistance/ No funds
available

Project Title: The Active Parents

Problem Statement: Only 50% to 78% of the total parents’
population attends school meeting and
assemblies
Objective: To strengthen school and community
partnership from 50% to 100%
Root Cause: Poor communication dissemination
Project Title: Stakeholders’ Come and Support!!!
Problem Statement: Only 75% support has been given by
stakeholders to finance school facilities
enhancement.
Objective: To strengthen stakeholders’ support to the
programs and projects of school from 75% to
100%
Root Cause: Lack of mechanisms in acquiring stakeholders’
supports

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Budget
Responsible Source
Alumni Tracking Facebook January ICT None None
System through Account/Web 2016 Coordinator
Social Media such page
as Facebook
Election Alumni List of June Teachers P 500 PTA
Officers Officers 2016 Alumni Fund
Forum/Project Project March Teachers P 500 MOOE
Proposal Making/ Proposal 2016 SH
FB Posting Minutes of
Meeting
Maximize the Received copy Jan. to Teachers P 500 MOOE
advantage of social Pledge of Dec. SH
media to encourage Commitment 2016
stakeholders’ Approval
support Letter

Raffle Draw for Tickets August Teachers P 500 PTA

Acause/ Benefits Prize 2016 SH Fund
Dance Project
Adopt-A-School Agreements June Teachers P 500 MOOE
Program Projects 2016 SH
Proposal Sponsors

Project Team Members:

JUANARIO ELEJADO
QUEENIE P. COLIMA
NORAISAH B. GANDAMRA
PAPALA S. GUMPAL
COBRA MACALAWI
Project Title: Achievements Achieve!
Problem Statement: Periodical Test MPS has decreased over the
past three years
Objective: To increase Periodical Test and NAT MPS from
62.17% to at least 75% gradually
Root Cause: Poor study habits

Project Title: HES FACE (Financial Accountability and

Credibility of Expenditures)
Problem Statement: 100% transparency information of all school
funds
Objective: To strengthen financial efficiency from 80% to
100%
Root Cause: Lack of data management techniques

Project Title: Project SOBMS – School Operation Budget

Management System
Problem Statement: Late downloading and liquidation reporting of
MOOE, delays school operations on programs,
projects, activities and expenses
Objective: To strengthen financial efficiency from 90% to
100%
Root Cause: Late Downloading of MOOE funds techniques

Project Title: SBM Onward

Problem Statement: School has been in level 2 for three (3) years
now. By the end of S.Y. 2016, the school shall
improve to level 3
Objective: To improve/increase school’s SBM level from
level 2 to level 3 with proper date
management
Root Cause: Lack of data management mechanisms

Project Title: PROJECT PUTRES (Pupil Tracking Record

System)
Problem Statement: 0 out of 560 pupils has no record on school
tracking system
Objective: To provide pupils with effective and efficient
tracking records from 0% to 100%
Root Cause: No available tracking system for pupils
Project Title: PROJECT HES (Disaster Risk Reduction
Management)
Problem Statement: Most students and parents neglect the
importance of risk and disaster awareness and
proper management system
Objective: To provide effective and efficient mechanism
system of SDRR from 20% to 75%
Root Cause: Poor effective and efficient disaster and risk
management system
MONITORING AND EVALUATION

MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROCEDURE

The School Quality Management Team (SQMT) is responsible in

the monitoring and evaluation of the programs and projects
implemented by the school based on the School Improvement Plan
and Annual Implementation Plan. M & E will be done every quarter in
order to keep track on the implementation and to provide objective
information that can inform decision making in order to continuously
improve the delivery of school services for basic and the school’s
performance or health to achieve the desired educational outcomes.
This will provide valid, reliable and accurate data in decision making to
come-up with possible actions and interventions to achieve the said
desired outcomes.

Hereunder are the procedures/processes followed in the School

Monitoring Evaluation and adjustment (SMEA Processes):

1. Data Gathering
Data gathering is done quarterly by internal M & E to Teachers, SHs
& project Implementers during the re-work prior to SMEA. Physical
Outputs (PO) accomplished are identified form their work plans
together with the standards if followed. School Internal Monitoring
and Evaluation Team (IMET) consolidate theory accomplishments
using PO Template and prepares the MOVs to support the report
which includes identification of issues, facilitating and hindering
factors, lessons learned and good practices encountered by
schools which are identified before the SMEA proper, collecting
both quantitative and qualitative information.

2. Data Validation
Determining if reported data are based on standards and MOVs

3. Data Processing and Analysis

Summary of accomplishments, issues for resolution and lessons
learns presented to management. The quantitative data can be
transformed into percentages, ratios, ranks or measures of central
tendency. These are also presented in tables and graphs to show
relationship between variables. The analysis can correlate physical
outputs with funds utilized. Analyzing information required to answer
M & E questions on Efficiency, Effectiveness & Relevance. Agree on
a set of Planning Standards. Review data and make initial
conclusions. Write conclusions.
4. Management Response
Reporting of M & E results by the school IMET is used to validate
information during the actual MEA

5. Adjustment of Plan
This can be in terms of modifying the earlier strategies used,
rescheduling of activities, aligning available resources, making
decisions, on discounting the projects. Etc.