Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Experiment - K
ME18B064
26.08.2019
Applied Mechanics Lab
Objective:
To study the buckling of a column under axially applied load with various boundary
conditions and compare the experimental buckling loads with the Euler buckling
formulae.
Equipment Required:
The main part of the apparatus is the back plate with a load cell at one end and a device
to load the struts at the top. At one end is a loading device which uses a screw to apply
loads to the struts. The screw is in fixing blocks with bearings to give precise and easy
load application.The bottom chuck fixes to an articulated parallelogram mechanism,
which prevents rotation but allows movement in the vertical direction against the ring
load cell. At the opposite end is the load measuring device. This is a precision mechanism
that resists the bending moments produced by the struts as they deflect, and transmits
the pure axial force to an electronic load cell. This gives an accurate measurement of
buckling load. The mechanism reacts to the considerable side thrust produced by the
strut under buckling conditions, with little friction in the vertical direction. A digital load
meter shows the load.
1
Theory:
Buckling
Members in compression can fail either by crushing (excessive compressive stress) or by
buckling: short members fail by crushing while long slender members fail by buckling. A
type of failure that is sometimes overlooked for a body subject to compressive loading,
is that due to instability, called buckling. Buckling is a form of instability, it occurs
suddenly with large changes in deformation but little change in loading.
· Critical Buckling Load: For a given column the minimum load causing buckling depends on
the geometrical and mechanical characteristics (length, cross-section, Young’s modulus,
and end support condition) of the column.
The longer and more slender the column is, the lower the safe compressive stress
that it can stand. The slenderness of a column is measured by the slenderness ratio, L/k,
where L is the length of the column and (lower case) k = (I/A)1/2 the radius of gyration of
the cross sectional area about the centroidal axis. The minimum radius of gyration is the
one to be considered. This corresponds to the minimum value of I, the second moment of
area of the section. A is the cross section area.
The radius of gyration is determined from the second moment of area: divided by the
cross-section area. For a rectangular bar, having width and depth, the second moment of
area is;
2
Euler’s Formula
Where, Pcr is the Euler buckling load (N), E is Young’s modulus (GPa), I is the second
moment of area (mm4). Choose appropriately Ixx or Iyy for given cross section) Le =
Effective length of strut (mm);
3
· Pin joints are friction-less (no moment constraint) and fixed ends are rigid (no rotation
deflection).
· The direct stress is very small as compared to the bending stress (the material is
compressed only within the elastic range of strains).
· The length of the column is very large as compared to the cross-sectional dimensions of
the column.
· The column fails only by buckling. This is true if the compressive stress in the column does
not exceed the yield strength σy.
Procedure
Make sure the digital force display is ‘on’. Check that the mini DIN lead from ‘Force Input
1’ on the Digital Force Display to socket marked ‘Force Output’ on the right – hand side of
the unit. Carefully Zero the force meter using the dial on the front panel of the
instrument. Gently apply a small load with a finger to the top of the load cell mechanism
and release. Zero the meter again if necessary. Repeat to ensure that the meter returns to
zero. Note: If the meter is only +/- 1N, lightly tap the frame (there may be a little ‘stiction’
and this should overcome it)
4
i. Referring to Figure 3, fit the bottom chuck to the machine and remove the top chuck.
ii. Use the strut given for your experiments. Measure the cross section using the vernier.
iii. Adjust the position of the sliding cross crosshead to accept the strut using the
thumbnuts to lock off the slider. Ensure that there is maximum amount of travel
available on the hand wheel thread to compress the strut. Finally tighten the locking
screws.
iv. Carefully back off the hand wheel so that the strut is resting in the notch but not
transmitting any load; rezero the forcemeter using the front panel control.
v. Carefully start the loading of the strut. If the strut begins to buckle to the left, “flick”
the strut to the right and vice versa (this reduces any errors associated with the
straightness of the strut)
vi. Turn the hand wheel until there is no further increase in load (the load may peak and
then drop as it settles into the notches). Do not load the struts after the buckling load has
been reached otherwise the strut will become permanently deformed. Record the final
load as shown in sample table under ‘buckling load’. Try loading the strut three times
and take the average of these as the experimental buckling load.
i. Follow the same procedure as in experiment 1, but this time remove the bottom chuck
and clamp the specimen using the cap head screw and plate to make a pinned –fixed end
condition (Fig. 4). Do not load the struts after the buckling load has been reached
otherwise the strut will become permanently deformed.
ii. Record your results as per the sample table. Note that the test length of the struts is
shorter than in Experiment 1 due to allowance made for clamping the specimen. Use this
changed length in calculations.
5
6
7
8
TABLES
Rough
9
Fair
Buckling Load(Pcr)
(Experimental)
Breadth Buckling Load % Error
Length Thicknes IXX (mm4) Iyy (mm4) N
Strut No. (b) theory (Theo-Exp)/
(L) mm s (d) mm bd3/12 b3d/12
mm N Theo
Trial Average
125,12
1.a 370 1.6 37.26 12.71 6897.1 128.33 192.42 33.3
9,131
10,11,1
1.b 328 0.8 23.8 1.015 896.75 11 16.55 33.5
2
6301.1 66,67,6
1.c 470 1.4 37.8 8.6436 66.33 80.98 18.09
84 6
Buckling Load(Pcr)
(Experimental)
Breadth Buckling Load % Error
Length Thicknes IXX (mm4) Iyy (mm4) N
Strut No. (b) theory (Theo-Exp)/
(L) mm s (d) mm bd3/12 b3d/12
mm N Theo
Trial Average
294,29
2.a 348.6 1.6 37.26 12.71 6897.1 294.33 412.9 28.71
6,293
27,26,2
2.b 306.6 0.8 23.8 1.015 896.75 27 40.71 33.67
8
6301.1 159,16
2.c 448.6 1.4 37.8 8.6436 161.33 177.86 9.29
84 2,163
10
GRAPH
11
From the values given in table it can be seen that different columns buckle at different
critical loads. The buckling depends on many factors such as the material by which the
column is made of and the way by which both ends are fixed or pinned.The E value of all
struts are the same but there is difference in the I and L values.It is observed that all the
struts buckled in a half sine wave when both ends are pinned. When one end was fixed
the effective length of strut was reduced to value of 0.7L. So the buckling load varies for
pinned-pinned strut and fixed-pinned strut.
According to Euler formula, the buckling load is directly proportional to area moment of
inertia I and inversely proportional to square of length. This is verified from
experimental data.
.There are errors in the range of 10-35% between experimental and theoretical
values. This could be due to:
12