Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

NATIONAL TERRITORY because our constitution only allows one

state, which is the Republic of the Philippines.


What is the state according to the Montevideo
Convention? The concept of association under international
law is more manifested in the MOA-AD
A state is a person of international law. under par. 4 considering people, territory and
governance.
Implication: meaning you have the
personality to come before international “The relationship between the central
tribunals and sue other states who are also government and BJE shall be associative
considered persons under the convention characterized by shared authority and
responsibility..”
Article 1 (under this convention) – provides
for the elements of a state In international law: an association is a
relationship between 2 unequal states.
1. Person – permanent population Notwithstanding that they are states of
2. Territory – defined unequal power, the contracting parties are
3. Government both states nonetheless.
4. Sovereignty – capacity to enter into
relations with other states We have one state who is more powerful
(principal) and the less powerful state
Q: They have their own government, territory (associate).
and they are all females
What happens?
A: Reproduction is necessary as part of the
population. The associate state delegates some of the
sovereignty to the principal. Why? Because in
State (as defined in PH textbooks) countries that were once colonized by more
- a community of persons more or less powerful states, the latter does not let go of
numerous, permanently occupying a definite that colony easily despite the independence of
portion of territory, independent of external the associate. They do not think that the
control, and possessing an organized associate is ready hence, they rely on the
government to which the great body of its principal.
inhabitants render habitual obedience.
MOA-AD provisions which provides BJE as
Province of North Cotabato an associative state

Bangsamoro Juridical Entity 1. MOA-AD has the capacity into


Sate or expanded version of ARMM? economic relations with other states
2. The BJE can actually participate in
SC: it is a state. It is an associated state. international meeting and events
Therefore, the MOA-AD is unconstitutional 3. The BJE delegates external defense to
the central government.
4. BJE has the right to participate in What compromises Philippine
diplomatic missions Archipelago?

Article 1, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution 1935 constitution did not use the word
Philippine archipelago.
The national territory comprises the
Philippine archipelago, with all the islands 1973 first time to use Philippine
and waters embraced therein, and all other Archipelago which was carried over in the
territories over which the Philippines has 1987 Consti.
sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its
terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, “The Philippine archipelago, with all the
including its territorial sea, the seabed, the islands and waters embraced therein..” is
subsoil, the insular shelves, and other exactly the same text used in the 1973
submarine areas. The waters around, consti.
between, and connecting the islands of the
archipelago, regardless of their breadth and Reference for Philippine Archipelago:
dimensions, form part of the internal waters
of the Philippines a. Article 1, 1935 Constitution – “all
territory over which the present
1. Philippine archipelago, with all the government exercises jurisdiction”;
islands and waters embraced therein inclusion of batanes
- What is an archipelago? What b. Treaty of Paris – unclear about tSibutu,
comprises the Philippine Archipelago? Cagayan de Cebu, Turtle Islands, Mangsee
What is the archipelagic doctrine? Islands
c. Treaty of Washington – covered the
ARCHIPELAGO, DEFINED islands of Sibutu
1. body of islands, surrounding d. Treaty between US and Great Britain –
waters (around and between) turtle islands and mangsee islands
connecting these islands
2. wide body of water which is Therefore, all Islands embraced by these
studded with islands treaties are what compromise the
archipelago.
1935 Constitution
- our understanding of an archipelago is UNCLOS
hinged on the 2nd definition
-Group of islands surrounded by a body
but virtue of UNCLOS III (Art. 46) of water and then created maritime zones.

Archipelago is defined as a group of ARCHIPELAGIC DOCTRINE


islands including its interconnecting the waters around, between and
waters. connecting the islands of the archipelago,
regardless of their breadth and
dimensions, form part therein of the 3. COMPONENTS OF THE
internal waters of the Philippines NATIONAL TERRITORY. Terrestrial
– all the land above the sea that belong
Purpose: to treat our country as a single to the PH (source: 1986 con-con
unit; important to include this so that records)
there is no body of water within the Fluvial – inland and landward waters
jurisdiction that can be considered as high Aerial – air above land up until the
seas (which we do not have jurisdiction outer space
over). Territorial sea – 12 nautical miles from
baseline
2. all other territories over which the Seabed – land that holds the sea
Philippines has sovereignty or Subsoil – beneath surface soil and
jurisdiction – Sabah, Spratlys, seabed
Scarborough Shoal, Marianas and insular shelves – directly under water
Batanes (included because before beyond territorial sea until the edge of
batanes was not part of the Philippines continental margin
by virtue of the archipelagic doctrine)
Sabah – Section 2, RA 5446; the
definition of the territorial sea around 4. ARCHIPELAGIC DOCTRINE. The
the territory of Sabah, situated in waters around, between, and
North Borneo, our which the connecting the islands of the
Philippines has acquired dominion and archipelago, regardless of their breadth
sovereignty and dimensions, form part of the
internal waters of the Philippines.
Spratlys – Section 1, PD 1596; Section
2, RA 9522 “Regime of Islands” under - Talks about the 1st.sentence. More
the Republic of the Philippines specific approach.
consistent with Article 2 of UNCLOS
BASELINE AND MARITIME ZONES
Scarborough Shoal – Section, RA 9522;
another baseline law, which the Normal baseline – Article 5, UNCLOS III;
Congress enacted for purposes for Except where otherwise provided in this
compliance with UNCLOS Convention, the normal baseline for
measuring the breadth of the territorial sea is
the low-water line along the coast as marked
Marianas Islands on large-scale charts officially recognized by
the coastal state
Batanes – part of the PH islands by
virtue of the UNCLOS Straight baselines – article 7, UNCLOS III, In
localities where the coastline is deeply
intended and cut into, or if there is a fringe of
islands along the coast in its immediate
vicinity, the method of straight baselines
joining appropriate points may be employed Magallona v. Ermita
in drawing the baseline from which the - RA 9522 is unconstitutional because
breadth of the territorial sea is measured; reduces our maritime territory
drawing the line from the outermost part of - It necessarily violated our concept of
the outermost part of the outermost island. Philippine Archipelago

Article 47 of UNCLOS III – limit is 125 Martime zones – we own it; no state can
nautical miles of the straight line that you’ve dictate what we do there
drawn
EEZ - we only have sovereign rights there;
Why we follow the straight baseline? there is a regime of sharing among the
neighboring countries; you cannot exclusively
Proof: all our baseline laws employ the enjoy the benefit only that you have more or
straight baseline method less a say on how the other countries will use
it by virtue of your sovereign rights
BASELINE LAWS (UNCLOS III); Philippines only has a
sovereign right over EEZ
RA 3046
RA 5446 Sovereignty – no other country can tell what
Article 47 of UNCLOS III we are going to do; result of ownership of a
particular territory
1982 – we became a party to the UNCLOS
Sovereign – you don’t own it fully
ARTICLE 47 OF UNCLOS III
1. Join the outermost points of the SC: The UNCLOS has nothing to do with the
outermost islands acquisition or loss of territory. It is a
2. When you join the outermost point of multilateral treaty regulating, among others,
the outermost islands, the ratio of the sea-use rights over maritime zones.
water to the land should be 9:1 Therefore, the UNCLOS would not resolve
3. When you draw the baselines the our conflicting claims over Scarborough
length should not exceed 125 nautical Shoal, Spratlys and even Sabah.
miles
4. Drawing of such baseline should not Regime of islands – has a different treatment;
depart from any general configuration own maritime zones
of the Philippine archipelago

RA 5446
- provided all the guidelines but became
problematic because of UNCLOS III
Internal Water v. Archipelagic Water
hence, we passed
RA 9522 – present baseline law; third and so
Territorial sea – can invoke right of innocent
far the last
passage for as long as the passage is innocent
-comply with UNCLOS III
Internal water – perspective of our - Preventive measures are put so that it
Constitution will not have adversary threats to your
Archipelagic water – perspective of UNCLOS territory
III EEZ
- an area beyond an adjacent to the
territorial sea; should not exceed 200
Under UNCLOS III nautical miles from the baseline
- sovereign rights: you really have the
There is innocent passage in archipelagic choice WON you would want to share
water it and impose conditions as to how that
area will be utilized
Is there innocent passage in our internal Super-jacent water – water above the seabed
waters?

-There is innocent passage. However, in the


absence of municipal legislation for innocent
passage such right is customary under
international law.

Implication: it means that you have no other


choice as a state but to comply with that law
because it is customary

The right to innocent passage had been used


by other states before.

DOMESTIC JUDICIAL BODY


- our constitution over international law
will prevail

Territorial sea – adjacent belt of the sea; there


is a right of innocent passage under here

INNOCENT PASSAGE
- not prejudicial to the peace, good order
and security of the coastal state
Contiguous Zone
- not exceed beyond 24 nautical miles
from the baseline
- Sovereign rights

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen