Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Answers to Questions
1 Direct holdings is a result of a direct investments in the voting common stock of one or more investee,
while indirect holdings is a result of investments that enable the investor to control or significantly
influence the decisions of an investee NOT directly owned through an investee directly owned. The
accounting method for both types of holdings are the same, equity method is used for 20% or more
holdings directly or indirectly, and consolidation is used for majority holdings directly or indirectly.
PARENT
80%
SUBSIDIARY 60%
A75%
SUBSIDIARY
B
In the father-son-grandson structure, the parent owns 80% of subsidiary A and subsidiary A
owns 75% of subsidiary B, so the parent indirectly owns 60% (80%*75%) of subsidiary B.
b. Connecting Affiliates
PARENT
70% 42%
20%
3 An indirect holding involves the ability of one corporation to control another by virtue of its control over
one or more other corporations. A mutual holding affiliation structure is a special type of indirect holding
where affiliates indirectly own themselves.
4 The parent’s direct and indirect ownership of Subsidiary B is 49 percent (70% ´ 70%). However,
consolidation of Subsidiary B is still appropriate because 70 percent of B’s stock is held within the
affiliation structure and only 30 percent is held by the noncontrolling stockholders of B.
5 Approach A
Pat
Sam
Stan
Approach B
Pat Sam Stan
Separate earnings $200,000 $160,000 $100,000
Allocate Stan’s income to Sam
($100,000 ´ 70%) + 70,000 -70,000
Allocate Sam’s income to Pat
($230,000 ´ 80%) +184,000 -184,000 0
Controlling share $384,000
Noncontrolling interest share $ 46,000 $30,000
6 When the schedule approach for allocating income is used, investment income from the lowest subsidiary
must be added to the separate income of the next subsidiary to determine that subsidiary’s net income
before it can be allocated to the next subsidiary, and so on.
7 P S1 80% S2 70%
Separate earnings $20,000 $10,000 $5,000
Deduct: Unrealized profit - 1,000
S1’s investment in S2 account was not adjusted for the unrealized profits because this would create a
disparity between S1’s investment in S2 account and S1’s share of S2’s equity.
8 A mutual holding situation exists because two affiliates hold ownership interests in each other.
9 Under the treasury stock approach, parent stock held by subsidiary is considered as treasury stock, hence
the investment account is maintained using the cost basis. The conventional approach, however, viewed
the stock as normal stocks, hence the investment account is maintained using the equity basis. This will
result in different amount of accounts, especially for the consolidated retained earnings and the
noncontrolling interest amount.
10 In situations in which a subsidiary holds stock in the parent, both the conventional and treasury stock
approaches are acceptable, but they do not result in equivalent consolidated financial statements. The
consolidated retained earnings and noncontrolling interest amounts will usually be different because of
different amounts of investment income. The treasury stock approach is not applicable when the mutually
held stock involves subsidiaries holding the stock of each other.
12 The theory is that parent stock purchased by a subsidiary is, in effect, returned to the parent and
constructively retired. By recording the constructive retirement of the parent stock on parent books, parent
equity will reflect the equity of stockholders outside the consolidated entity. Also, recording the
constructive retirement, by reducing parent stock and retained earnings to reflect amounts applicable to
controlling stockholders outside the consolidated entity, will establish consistency between capital stock
and retained earnings for the parent’s outside stockholders and parent net income, dividends, and earnings
per share which also relate to the outside stockholders of the parent.
P = $100,000 + .8S
S = $40,000 + .1P
P = $100,000 + .8($40,000 + .1P)
P = $143,478
Controlling Share of Consolidated net income = $143,478 ´ 90% = $129,130
14 For eliminating the effect of mutually held parent stock, two generally accepted approaches are used—the
treasury stock approach and the conventional approach. But when the mutually held stock involves
subsidiaries holding stock of each other, the treasury stock approach is not applicable.
15 By adding beginning noncontrolling interest and noncontrolling interest share (determined by multiplying
the company’s net income by the noncontrolling interest percentage) and subtracting the noncontrolling
interest’s percentage of dividends, the noncontrolling interest can be determined without use of
simultaneous equations.
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
Solution E9-1
a. In 2013, Pandu Tbk only have indirect holdings of Dewa Tbk through Sunda Tbk, so the structure is the
father-son-grandson. The percentage of ownership is calculated as follows:
Pandu’s ownership of Sunda ´ Sunda’s ownership of Dewa (90% ´ 60%) = 54%
b. In 2014, Pandu Tbk has both indirect and direct ownership of Dewa Tbk, so the structure is the
connecting affiliates. The percentage of ownership is calculated as follows:
Pandu’sindirect ownership of Dewa (a) + Pandu’s direct ownership of Dewa = 74%
Solution E9-2
Computational approach
Solution E9-3
*
Determine Penn’s and Sinn's income under consolidation
basis
P = Penn's income + Sinn's mutual income
S = Sinn's income + Penn's mutual income
P = $50,000 + 0.8S
S = $25,000 + 0.2P
S = $25,000 + 0.2($83,333.33)
S = $41,667.67
Solution E9-4
1 c
Income from Son is equal to:
70% of Son’s $160,000 income $112,000
70% of Son’s 80% interest in Tan’s
$100,000 income 56,000
Income from Son $168,000
2 d
Noncontrolling interest share is equal to:
30% direct noncontrolling interest in Son’s
$160,000 income $ 48,000
20% direct noncontrolling interest in Tan’s
$100,000 income 20,000
30% ´ 80% indirect noncontrolling interest in
Tan’s $100,000 income 24,000
Total noncontrolling interest share $ 92,000
3 d
Consolidated net income is equal to:
Combined separate incomes of $360,000 + $160,000 +
$100,000 $620,000
Less: Noncontrolling interest share 92,000
Controlling interest share of Consolidated net income $528,000
Alternative computation:
Pin’s separate income $360,000
Add: 70% of Son’s $160,000 income 112,000
Add: (70% ´ 80%) of Tan’s $100,000 income 56,000
Controlling interest share of Consolidated net income $528,000
Solution E9-5
Solution E9-6
Alternative solution
Noncontrolling
Reported + Adjusted Consolidated Interest
Income - Adjustments = Income - Net Income = Share
Pet $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 0
Solution E9-7
1 a
Separate income of Tar $400,000
Direct noncontrolling interest X 30%
$120,000
2 a
Separate income = net income of Van $240,000
Noncontrolling interest (direct) X 20%
$ 48,000
3 c
Total separate incomes $2,130,000
Less: Controlling Share of Consolidated net
income
Pan $1,240,000 ´ 100% $1,240,000
Sin $350,000 ´ 90% 315,000
Tar $400,000 ´ 90% ´ 70% 252,000
Win $(100,000) ´ 90% ´ 60% (54,000)
Van $240,000 ´ 90% ´ 80% 172,800
(1,925,800)
Total noncontrolling interest share $ 204,200
Alternative solution
Sin $350,000 ´ 10% $ 35,000
Tar $400,000 ´ 37% 148,000
Won $(100,000) ´ 46% (46,000)
Van $240,000 ´ 28% 67,200
Total noncontrolling interest share $ 204,200
4 a
[See computations for question 3]
5 d
Net income of Sin
Separate income $ 350,000
Add: 70% of Tar’s $400,000 280,000
Deduct: 60% of Won’s $(100,000) (60,000)
Add: 80% of Van’s $240,000 192,000
Net income of Sin $ 762,000
Pan’s interest 90%
Investment increase 685,800
Less: Dividends received from Sin ($200,000 ´ 90%) (180,000)
Net increase $ 505,800
Solution E9-8
1 b
Separate income of Sam (net income) $ 80,000
Separate income of Ten $40,000 - ($80,000 ´ 10%) 32,000
Separate income of Pat
$240,000 - ($40,000 ´ 70%) - ($80,000 ´ 80%) 148,000
Total separate income $260,000
2 d
Pat Sam Ten
Separate income $148,000 $80,000 $32,000
Unrealized profit on inventory (10,000)
Unrealized profit on land _________ ________ (15,000)
Separate realized income $148,000 $70,000 $17,000
3 a
Pat’s separate income $148,000
Add: Investment income from Sam ($70,000 ´ 80%) 56,000
Add: Investment income from Ten
[$17,000 + ($70,000 ´ 10%)] ´ 70% 16,800
Pat’s income (controlling share of consolidated net income) $220,800
4 d
Total separate realized income $235,000
Less: Controlling share of consolidated net income 220,800
Noncontrolling interest share $ 14,200
Alternative solution
Direct noncontrolling interest in Sam ($70,000 ´ .1) $ 7,000
Indirect noncontrolling interest in Sam
($70,000 ´ .3 ´ .1) 2,100
Direct noncontrolling interest in Ten ($17,000 ´ .3) 5,100
Noncontrolling interest share $ 14,200
Solution E9-9
Solution E9-10
P = $400,000 + .7S
S = $240,000 + .8T
T = $160,000 + .1S
Solve for S
S = $240,000 + .8($160,000 + .1S)
S = $368,000 + .08S
S = $400,000
Compute P and T
P = $400,000 + .7($400,000)
P = $680,000
T = $160,000 + .1($400,000)
T = $200,000
Income Allocation
Controlling Share of Consolidated net income (equal to P) $680,000
Noncontrolling interest share in Sad ($400,000 ´ 20%) 80,000
Noncontrolling interest share in Two ($200,000 ´ 20%) 40,000
Total consolidated income $800,000
1 b
2 b
3 d
4 c
Supporting computations
Solve for A
A = $190,000 + .8[$170,000 + .15($230,000 + .25A)] + .7($230,000 + .25A)
A = $190,000 + $136,000 + $27,600 + .03A + $161,000 + .175A
A = $514,600 + .205A
.795A = $514,600
A = $647,295.59
Determine C
C = $230,000 + .25($647,295.59)
C = $391,823.90
Determine B
B = $170,000 + .15($391,823.90)
B = $228,773.58
Solution E9-12
1 d
Combined separate income $160,000
Less: Noncontrolling interest share 6,750
Controlling Share of Consolidated net income $153,250
Alternatively:
Pet’s separate income $100,000
Add: Sod’s net income of $67,500 ´ 90% 60,750
Less: Dividends received from Pet ($50,000 ´ 15%) (7,500)
Controlling interest share of Consolidated net income $153,250
2 b
P = $100,000 + .9($60,000 + .15P)
.865P = $154,000
P = $178,035
S = $60,000 + $26,705 = $86,705
Solution E9-13
Supporting computations
Computation of income from Sat:
Sat’s separate income $ 50,000
Add: Sat’s dividend income from Pug 6,000
Sat’s net income 56,000
Pug’s ownership interest 70%
Pug’s equity in Sat’s income 39,200
Less: Dividends paid to Sat ($60,000 ´ 10%) (6,000)
Less: Excess amortization ($9,000 x 70%) (6,300)
Income from Sat $ 26,900
2 Conventional approach
Pug’s net income and consolidated net income
S = $50,000 + .1($159,892)
S = $65,989
Or alternatively,
($65,989 ´ 70%) - ($159,892 ´ 10%) - $6,300 excess $ 23,903
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
Solution P9-1
Solution P9-2
1 Sea’s books
Cash 28,000
Investment in Toy (70%) 28,000
To record dividends received from Toy ($40,000 ´ 70%).
$ 70,000
Pot’s books
Cash 96,000
Investment in Sea (80%) 96,000
To record dividends received from Sea ($120,000 ´ 80%).
Solution P9-3
Preliminary computations
Retained Earnings
Retained earnings — Pen $115,500 f 12,500
g 8,000 $ 95,000
Retained earnings — Sir 160,000 e 160,000
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 67,000 $ 36,000 $ 10,000 $ 113,000
Accounts receivable 70,000 50,000 20,000 j 10,000 130,000
Inventories 110,000 75,000 35,000 i 20,000 200,000
Plant and
equipment — net 140,000 425,000 115,000 e 25,000 f 18,750 686,250
Investment in d 40,000
Sir 80% 508,000 e 468,000
Investment in 95,000 a 7,500
Tip 50% b 87,500
Investment in 74,000 a 6,000
Tip 40% b 68,000
Goodwill ________ ________ ________ b 30,000 30,000
$990,000 $660,000 $180,000 $1,159,250
Solution P9-4
Income allocation
Definitions
P = Par’s income on a consolidated basis
S = Sit’s income on a consolidated basis
T = Tot’s income on a consolidated basis
Equations
P = $400,000 + .8S + .5T
S = $200,000 + .2T
T = $100,000 + .1S
Solve for S
S = $200,000 + .2($100,000 + .1S)
S = $220,000 + .02S
.98S = $220,000
S = $224,489.80 or $224,490
Compute T
T = $100,000 + .1($224,489.80)
T = $100,000 + $22,448.98
T = $122,448.98 or $122,449
Compute P
P = $400,000 + .8($224,489.80) + .5($122,448.98)
P = $640,816.33
or $640,816
Income allocation
Controlling share of consolidated net income = P = $640,816
Noncontrolling interest share in Sit ($224,490 ´ .1) 22,449
Noncontrolling interest share in Tot ($122,449 ´ .3) 36,735
$700,000
Equation
P = ($400,000 - $40,000) + .8S + .5T
S = $200,000 + .2T
T = ($100,000 - $20,000) + .1S
Solve for S
S = $200,000 + .2($80,000 + .1S)
S = $216,000 + .02S
S = $220,408.16
Compute T
T = $80,000 + .1($220,408.16)
T = $102,040.82
Compute P
P = $360,000 + .8($220,408.16) + .5($102,040.82)
P = $587,346.94
Income allocation
Controlling share of consolidated net income = P = $587,346.94
Noncontrolling interest share in Sit ($220,408.16 ´ 10%) 22,040.82
Noncontrolling interest share in Tot ($102,040.82 ´ 30%) 30,612.24
$640,000.00
Solution P9-5
Preliminary computations
Pamela's dividend -
beginning $ 40,000
Intercompany dividend adjustment $ (4,000)
Pamela's dividend - ending $ 36,000 2
Noncontrolling
interest $ 35,000
To eliminate equity accounts and
recognize goodwill
Consolidate
Pamela Shin Adjustments d
and eliminations Statements
Debits Credits
Income
Statement
$ $ $
Sales 220,000 110,000 330,000
Income from $ $ $
Shin 35,600 a 35,600 -
Dividend $ $ $
income 4,000 a 4,000 -
Expenses $ $ $
including COGS (100,000) (70,000) (170,000)
Noncontrolling $ $
interest share b 4,400 (4,400)
Controlling
share of net $ $ $
income 155,600 44,000 155,600
Retained
Earnings
Statement
Retained
earnings - $ $
Pamela 308,000 308,000
Retained
earnings - $ $
Shin 140,000 c 140,000
$ $ $ $
Dividends (36,000) (30,000) a 27,000 (36,000)
$
b 3,000
Controlling
share of net $ $ $
income 155,600 44,000 155,600
Retained
earnings - $ $ $
December 31 427,600 154,000 427,600
Balance Sheet
Other assets $ $ $
600,000 274,000 874,000
Investment in $ a $ $
Shin - 90% 327,600 12,600 -
c $
315,000
Investment in $ d $ $
Pamela - 10% 80,000 80,000 -
Goodwill c $ $
10,000 10,000
$ $ $
927,600 354,000 884,000
Common stock - $ $
Pamela 500,000 500,000
Common stock - $ c $
Shin 200,000 200,000
Retained $ $ $
earnings 427,600 154,000 427,600
$ $
927,600 354,000
Treasury stock d $ $
80,000 (80,000)
Noncontrolling b $ $
interest 1,400 36,400
c $
35,000
$
884,000
Solution P9-6
Calculations
Income from Sip
Par separate income (140,000 - 80,000) $ 60,000
Sip separate income (100,000 + 3,000 - 60,000) $ 43,000
Formula:
P income = Adjusted Par income + % interest ´ S income
Adjusted Par income = $60,000 + $2,000 delayed gain on land
- $4,000 patent amortization (80%)
S income = Sip income + % interest ´ P income
P income = $58,000 + 80% ´ ($43,000 + 20% ´ P income)
P income = $92,400 + .16 ´ P income
P income = $110,000
S income = $43,000 + 20% ´ $110,000
S income = $65,000
Controlling share of consolidated net income = P income ´ % outstanding
Controlling share = $88,000
Noncontrolling share = S income ´ % outstanding
Noncontrolling share = $12,000 [($65,000 - $5,000 amortiz.) x 20%]
Income from Sip = consolidated income less P separate income
Income from Sip = $28,000 ($88,000-$60,000)
Retained Earnings
Retained earnings — Par $ 405,710 $ 405,710
Retained earnings — Sip $ 180,000 e 180,000
Controlling share of NI 88,000ü 47,000ü 88,000
Dividends 16,000 * 20,000 * c 16,000
g 4,000 16,000 *
Retained earnings
December 31 $ 477,710 $ 207,000 $ 477,710
Balance Sheet
Other assets $ 448,000 $ 157,000 $ 605,000
Investment in Sip 109,710 a 2,000 b 4,000
d 100,000 c 12,000
e 195,710
Investment in Par 100,000 d 100,000
Patent __________ __________ e 20,000 f 5,000 15,000
$ 557,710 $ 257,000 $ 620,000
Solution P9-7
Preliminary Computations
Pan’s investment cost $170,000
Solve for P
P = $100,000 + .8($40,000 + .1P)
P = $100,000 + $32,000 + .08P
P = $143,478
Compute S
S = $40,000 + .1($143,478)
S = $54,348
Income allocation
Controlling Share of Consolidated net income ($143,478 ´ 90% $129,130
outside ownership)
Noncontrolling interest share ($54,348 ´ 20%) 10,870
Cash 16,000
Investment in Set 16,000
To record receipt of 80% of Set’s dividends.
Cash 5,000
Investment in Pan (10%) 5,000
To record receipt of dividends from Pan ($50,000 ´ 10%).
Alternative solution
Noncontrolling interest January 1, 2013 ($250,000 ´ 20%) $ 50,000
Noncontrolling interest share ($54,348 ´ 20%) 10,870
Noncontrolling interest dividends (4,000)
Noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2013 $ 56,870
c Dividends 5,000
Investment in Set 5,000
To eliminate dividends.