Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Yahya Makee
(Under the guidance of Dr. J.M. Banday)
Conclusions 59
Future Work 60
Bibliography 61
Appendix-A: Normal Concrete Mix Proportions 63
Yahya Makee
1
L IS T O F TAB L E S
Pa ge
No. Ti tl e
N o.
1 Ba si c a gg r ega te t e st s 45
2 Si e v e an a ly si s o f c oar s e agg r ega te s 46
3 Si e v e an a ly si s o f al l in a gg re gat e s 46
4 Si e v e an a ly si s o f san d 47
5 Si e v e an a ly si s o f C oal a s h 47
6 Si e v e an a ly si s o f Wo od ash 48
7 Bu lk d en sity o f a gg re gat e s 48
8 Con st itu en t p rop ort ion of m ix e s wi th w/ c =0 .5 0 49
15 T e st r e su lt s o f m ix e s wi th w / c= 0 .4 5 54
16 T e st r e su lt s o f m ix e s wi th w / c= 0. 42 54
17 Ph ys i cal in t er fa ci al w id th s b et w een ag gr e gat e an d c e m en t p a st e 58
L IS T O F F I G UR E S
Page
No. Title
No.
2 U-type test 28
3 L- Box test 29
4 V-funnel 29
2
Vari at io n o f r eq uir ed V M A d o sa g e to at tai n re q ui red st ab i li t y wi t h i n crea se i n W A
9 53
co n te n t
L IS T O F AB B R IV A TI O NS
Ab br ev ia t io n Ful l Fo r m
HW R A Hi g h wa ter r ed uci n g a ge nt
VM A Vi sco si t y mo d i fyi n g ad mi x t ur e
µm Micro me t er ( mi cro n)
RH Re la ti ve h u mid it y
W /C W ater to Ce me n t R at io
ST S Sp l it te n s ile s tre n g t h
CS Co mp re s s i ve str e n gt h
WA W o o d as h
CA Co a l a s h
LS Li me s to ne
SRA S hr i n k a ge r ed uci n g ad d i ti ve s
RM C Re ad y mi x ed co n cret e
PC P r eca st co n cre te
3
ABSTRACT
Self-compacting concrete, also referred to as self -consolidating concrete, is abl e
to flow and consolidate under its own weight and is deaerated almost completel y
while flowing in the formwork. It is cohesive enough to fill the spaces of
almost any size and shape without segregation or bleeding. This makes SCC
particularl y useful wherever placing is diffic ult, such as in heavil y-reinforced
concrete members or in complicated work forms .
The objectives of this research were to develop SCC with locall y available
waste materials viz. coal ash & wood ash and to optimize the percentage partial
cement replacement in SCC by them and their combination so as to achieve
strength similar to normal concrete at constant water cement ratio and to
examine the bonding between the aggregate and the cement paste of normal and
SCC using the Scanning Electron Microscope and to study the effect of
introduction of wood ash and coal ash on it . 15 cm cubical specimens were
tested for compressive strength and cylindrical specimens of 150mm dia meter
and 300mm height were tested for split tensile strength. The water – cement
ratios viz. 0.50, 0.45 & 0.42 where taken for this study. All the components
were kept same in case of SCC for every w/c ratio, except the percentage partial
cement replacement by coal ash & wood ash and the chemical admixtures, which
were adjusted for obtaining the self-compactabilit y of the concrete.
All SCC mixes without any cement replacement by coal ash and wood ash
exhibited greater values both in splitting tensile and compress ive strength
compared to normal concrete. Optimum percentage partial cement replacem ent
in SCC by both wood ash and coal ash so as to achieve similar strength as that
of conventional normal concrete at constant w/c ratio was found to be 10%. It
was also observed that strength of SCC decrea ses graduall y with increase in
percentage partial cement replacement by wood ash, however it decreases
significantl y with increase in percentage partial cement replacement by coal ash
beyond 10%. This pattern of decrease in strength was seen in mixes with all the
three w/c ratios taken for this study. It was also observed that SCC mixes with
percentage partial cement replacement by combination of ashes viz. coal ash and
wood ash had better strengths that SCC mixes with replacement by onl y one t ype
of ash at constant w/c ratio. Further, it was observed that SCC had smaller or
similar physical interfacial widths even after 20% partial cement replacement by
coal ash or wood ash or their combination.
4
This thesis titled “Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete with Coal ash
and Wood ash” has been divided into six chapters viz.:
5
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
Self-compacting concrete can be defined as a fresh concrete which
possesses superior flowabilit y under maintained stabilit y (i.e. no segregation) ,
thus allowing self -compaction- that is, material consolidation without addition of
energy. The three propert ies that characterize a concrete as self -compacting are:
• Flowing abilit y- the abilit y to completely fill all areas and corners of the
formwork into which it is placed.
• Passing abilit y- the abilit y to pass through congested reinforcement
without separation of the constituents or blocking.
• Resistance to segregation - the abilit y to retain the coarse components of
the mix in suspension in order to maintain a homogeneous material.
Self-compacting concrete is described worldwide as one of the most
important development steps in concrete materials technology during the last
decades. SCC is based on new t ypes of highl y efficient water -reducing
admixtures combined with high powder content. Alternativel y, a viscosit y-
modifying agent can be added to the concrete mix when no or limited filler
amount is used. The main advantage of SCC is that the traditionall y needed
compaction work can be eliminated. This opportunit y means that several
potential benefits may be exploited. These benefits cover v arious important
areas, e.g. improved structural design, increased production efficiency , etc. The
obstacles for increased implementation of SCC include both technical and non -
technical issues. The use of SCC offers a more industrialized production. Not
onl y will it reduce the unhealthy tasks for workers, it can also reduce the
technical costs of in situ cast concrete constructions, due to improved
casting cycle, qualit y, durabilit y, surface finish and reliabilit y of concrete
structures and eliminating some of the potential for human error.
SCC is a sensitive mix, strongl y dependent on the composition
and the characteristics of its constituents. It has to possess the incompatible
properties of high flow abilit y tog ether with high segregation resistance. This
balance is made possible by the dispersing effect of high -range water-reducing
admixture combined with cohesiveness produced by a high concentration of fine
particles in additional filler material. The main mechanisms controlling this
fine balance are related to surface physics and chemistry; hence, SCC is strongl y
6
dependent on the activit y of the admixtures, as well as on the large surface
area generated by the high content of fines. Fresh SCC, like all cementitious
materials, is a concentrated particle suspension with a wide range of particle
sizes. The particles are affected by a complex balance of inter -particle forces
(i.e. interlocking, frictional, flocculation, colloidal, Vander Waals, and
electrostatic forces), generating a time dependence and viscoplastic
non-Newtonian behavior. In addition, the concretes have irreversible time -
dependent properties as a result of the chemical reactions. Since the ratio of
surface area to volume increases exponentiall y with particle irregularit y and
decreased size, this area has a predominant effect on fresh and hardened
concrete. Particles with apparentl y similar grading can provide significantl y
different effects on concrete properties . These differences can be related to the
fineness, shape, surface texture, porosity, etc. If the particles provide a large
specific area, a large quantit y of water will be adsorbed on the particles' surfaces
and less water will be available to lubricate a nd disperse the particles, which is
needed to provide flowabilit y. This adsorption will also influence the
development of negative capillary pore pressure, causing the paste to
contract. These contracting capillary forces are inversely pro portional to
the meniscus radius, and hence the capillary tension stresses increase with
decreasing pore sizes and inter -particle spaces. As a consequence of the large
surface area generated by the high concentration of powder material, and the
retarding effect of superplasticizer, the SCC may develop a large autogenous
shrinkage and thus a high plastic shrinkage cracking tendency.
A SCC mix can be produced with locall y available ordinary concrete
making materials and the general standard method is known as; increase the filler
content, decrease the coarse aggregate content and add a HWRA. The difficult y
with production of SCC is to succeed with the concrete within reasonable
economical frames and to reach repeatable properties through the whole
production chain, i.e. sufficient robustness. The material costs for SCC is in
general higher than ordinary vibrated concrete because of the increased amount
of cementi tious materials, fillers and third generation of super plasticizer. In
addition, using SCC is often associated with a large number of preliminary
examinations and an extensive qualit y control work during the production to
ensure the established conditions.
Self- compacting concrete, in principle, is not new. Special applications
7
such as underwater concreting have always required concrete, which could be
placed without the nee d for compaction [3]. In such circumstances vibration was
simpl y impossible. Earl y self -compacting concretes relied on very high
contents of cement paste and, once superplasticizers became available, they were
added in the concrete mixes. The mixes required specialized and well-controlled
placing methods in order to avoid segregation, and the high contents of cement
paste made them prone to shrinkage. The overall costs were very high and
applications remained very limited. The introduction of “modern” self -leveling
concrete or SCC is associated with the drive towards better qualit y concrete
pursued in Japan around 1983, where the lack of uniform and complete
compaction had been identified as the primary factor responsible for poor
performance of concrete structur es [5]. Due to the fact that there were no
practical means by which full compaction of concrete on a site was ever to be
full y guaranteed, the focus therefore turned onto the elimination of the need to
compact, by vibration or any other means. This led to the development of the
first practicable SCC by researchers Okamura and Ozawa, around 1986, at the
Universit y of Tokyo and the large Japanese contractors (e.g. Kajima Co., Maeda
Co., Taisei Group Co., etc.) quickl y took up the idea. Simultaneousl y with th e
Japanese developments in the SCC area, research and development continued in
mix-design and placing of underwater concrete where new admixtures were
producing SCC mixes with performance matching that of the Japanese SCC
concrete (e.g. Univers it y of Paisley / Scotland, University of She rbrooke /
Canada) [12].
Self-compacting concrete has already been used in several countries. In
Japan, major construction projects included the use of SCC in the late ’90s . SCC
has been successfully used in Bank ers Hall project, Canada; Akashi-Kaikyo
Bridge, Japan; LNG tank of Osaka Gas Company, Japan and Twin Towers of
Malasia. Today, self-compacting concrete is being studied worldwide, with
papers presented at almost every concrete -related conference, but unti l now
there is no universally adopted standardized test method for evaluation of
self-compactabilit y of this concrete. Currentl y, the use of self -compacting
concrete is being rapidl y adopted in many countries. The use of self -compacting
concrete should overcome concrete placement problems associated with the
concrete construction industry. However, there still is a need for conducting
8
more research and development work for the measurement and
standardization of the methods for the evaluation of the self -compacting
characteristics of SCC.
Hajime Okamura [19]: A new t ype of concrete, which can be compacted into
every corner of a fo rmwork purel y by means of its own weight, was proposed by
Okamura (1997). In 1986, he started a research project on the flowing abilit y and
workabilit y of this special t ype of concrete, later called self-compacting
concrete. The self-compactabilit y of this concrete can be largel y affected by the
characteri stics of materials and the mix proportions. In his study, Okamura
(1997) has fixed the coarse aggregate content to 50% of the solid volume and the
fine aggregate content to 40% of the mortar volume, so tha t self-compactabilit y
could be achieved easil y by adjusting the water to cement ratio and
superplasticizer dosage onl y.
Abdul Hameed [1] : Their work was focused on developing a SCC mix proportion
that would yield best results as far as strength and durabilit y is concerned. They
concluded that best possible aggregate mix proportion for SCC i.e. FA/CA= 1.1.
They also reported that under cyclic environment, durabilit y of SCC will not be
worse than that of normal vibrated concrete.
Dehn [8]: Dehn et al. have focu sed their research work on the time development
of SCC compressive and splitting tensile strength and the bond behavior between
the reinforcing bars and the self -compacting concrete compared to normal
concrete
These investigations showed, that the main p arameters which influence the
bond behavior are the surface of the re -bars, the number of load cycles, the mix
design, the direction of concreting, as well as the geometry of the (pull -out) test
specimens. Experimental results showed higher compressive str engths (36%) and
splitting tensile strengths (28%) of the SCC specimens compared to normal
concrete specimens. Also, the bond behavior measured at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days
after concreting was better for self -compacting concrete than that of normall y
vibrated concrete.
12
Corinaldesi [6]: The shrinkage and creep rates of SCC have been found to be
approximatel y 30% higher at an identical compressive strength; this is because of
the high amount of paste. Since SCC is rich in powder content and poor in the
coarse aggregate fraction, addition of fiber will be effective in counteracting
drying shrinkage. Further replacement of cement content by mineral additive can
also help in counteracting the drying shrinkage.
Mass concrete structures are particularl y vulnerable to the risk of cracking
due to the thermal gradient between the nucleus of the structure and its
periphery. This is related to the total heat of cement hydration developed in the
concrete at the time t, and the difference in dissipating this heat from the nucleus
Mindess [16]: Mineral admixtures are added to concrete as part of the total
cementitious system. They may be used in addition to or as a partial replacement
of Portland cement in concrete depending on the properties of the materials and
13
the desired effect on concrete Mineral admixtures are used to improve a
particular concrete propert y such as workabilit y, strength or compactabilit y. The
optimum amount to use should be esta blished by testing to determine:
Karim [15]: The t ypical range of particle sizes falls between 75 microns and 25
millimeters. They produced concrete with bottom ash with fl y ash as fillers.
However considerable loss of strength was also reported.
T.R. Naik [28]: Concrete is one of the most widel y used construction
materials in the world. However, the production of Portland cement, an
essential constituent of concrete, leads to the release of significant amount of
CO 2 , a greenhouse gas; one ton of Portland cement clinker product ion is said to
creates approximately one ton of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases (GHGs).
Environmental issues are playing an important role in the sustainable
development of the cement and concrete industry. It is important to develop
recycling technology fo r high-volume applications of coal combustion
products (CCPs) generated by using both conventional and
clean-coal technologies. Many different t ypes of CCPs are produced; for
example, fl y ash , bottom ash, c yclone-boiler slag, and clean -coal ash. In
general some of these CCPs can be used as a supplementar y
cementitious materials and use of Portland cement, therefore, can be reduced.
Wood ash has substantial potential for use as a mine ral admixture and as
an activator in cement -based materials. Wood ash has been used in the
making of structural -grade concrete, bricks, blocks, paving stones, and blended
cements. Air- entrained concrete can be achieved by using wood ash up to 35% .
Structural-grade concrete can be made using wood ash and its blends with Class
C fl y ash to achieve a compressive strength of 50 N/mm 2 .
14
Ferraris [12]: The slump test is widely used to evaluate the workabilit y of
concrete, but in the case of self -compacting concrete, it has serious drawbacks.
Other flow characteristics such as viscosit y or filling capacit y are needed to
define the flow in self -compacting concretes. Their research were to test flow
characteristics of SCC using two concrete rheometer s and the widel y recognized
V-flow and U-flow tests, and to determine the correlation between the two
rheometers and the tests.
They found that the slump flow alone is not enough to determine whether a
flowable concrete is a self -compacting concrete. Due to the fact, that the values
measured with the two t ypes of rheometers correlate relatively well on viscosit y
but not on yield stress, further measurements are needed to determine if the
correlation holds for other t ypes of aggregate and cementitious mater ials. Also,
based on the data acquired, the viscosity and the yield stress did not correlate
with the V-funnel or the U -flow tests.
Ratchayut Kasemchaisiri [24]: Concluded that slump flow and L-box passing
abilit y of the SCC mixtures with coal ash reduced , while the slump flow loss and
500-mm slump flow time (T 500) increased with the increase of coal ash
replacement level. However, the required slump flow could be maintained by
adding an extra dosage of super plasticizer. The increase of coal ash content
resulted in the reduction of compressive strength and caused the increase
of porosit y of hardened concrete. However, at 10 % coal ash replacement of
fine aggregate, the compressive strength at 56 days of age was improved by
pore refinement effect due to pozzolanic reaction which dominated over the
increase of porosit y. In terms of durabilit y, chloride ion permeabilit y,
carbonation depth and shrinkage in drying environment of most of the tested
coal ash SCC mixtures e xcept for the mixture with 10 % bottom ash were larger
than those of the control SCC, mainl y due to higher porosit y .On the other hand,
the resistance against sodium sulfate was enhanced with the increase of coal
ash content. The durabilit y of SCC mi xtures with coal ash could be improved in
long term by pore refinement d ue to pozzolanic reaction when water-curing was
conducted. As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that the optimum
replacement for the tested bottom ash was about 10 % by weight of total fine
aggregate. However, the coal ash replacement level higher than 10 % may be
15
applied for particular works depending on total concrete cost and construction
condition.
Ouchi [21]: Found from experimental results, the ratio of V -funnel speed to flow
area of cement paste with a fixed amount of superplasticizer was found to be
almost constant, independent of the water-cement ratio. A higher amount of
superplasticizer resulted in a lower ratio of V -funnel speed to flow area. The
ratio was proposed as an index for the effect of superplasticizer on cement paste
flowing abilit y and viscosit y from the viewpoint of achieving self -
compactabilit y. However, the relationship between high range water reducer
amount and its effect was found to differ depending on the t ype of cement or
chemical admixture.
Khayat [13]: evaluated the properties of welan gum in achieving self -compacting
concrete for use in congested members and confined areas. The viscosit y -
modifying admixture (welan gum) was used to ensure adequate stabilit y for
concrete cast in deep structural members and wall elements in order to avoid
segregation and bleeding which can result in local structural defects that can
affect its mechanical properties. All the SCC mixtures had high fi lling capacities
ranging between approximatel y 60 and 70 percent, indicating excellent
deformabilit y without blockage among closel y spaced obstacles. No external
bleeding was observed on the top surface of any of the cast wall elements.
Dehn [8]: Studied the interaction between the superplasticizer and viscosit y -
modifying agent and the bonding between the reinforcing bars and self -
compacting concrete. They found out that the pol ymer in the viscosit y modifier
(welan gum) and the pol ymer in the su perplasticiz er restrain each other and this
phenomena results in a higher segregation resistance and some larger dosage of
SP for a particular deformabilit y. It was also seen that depending on the
mix design and chemical admixtures dosages the bond behavior in self -
compacting concrete was better than the bond in conventional concrete.
Ozyildirim [22] : Some high -range water-reducing admixtures can retard final set
16
by one to almost four hours and if prolonged setting times are not
convenient, the admixture can be combined with an accelerating admixture
to counteract the retarding tendencies or even to provide some net
acceleration of setting. When water-reducing admixtures are used in concrete
mixtures, some increases i n compressive strength can be anticipated and these
increases can be observed in as earl y as one day if excessive retardation does not
occur. It is generall y agreed that increases in compressive strength are up to 25%
greater than would be anticipated from the decrease in water -cement ratio alone.
Probabl y, this reflects the development of a uniform microstructure when the
cement is dispersed.
Bijen and Rooij [4]: has shown that the parameters of concrete could be altered
for the better by choosing pro per materials or by modifying the physical
interfaces between the materials. He found that in a thick zone surrounding the
aggregate, a duplex layer of calcium hydroxide – Ca (OH)2 and a porous shell,
having properties different from the bulk ce ment paste, were present. These
factors encourage the deposition of oriented crystals of calcium hydroxide,
giving rise to weak planes along which micro cracks occur. Some methods found
to improve the aggregate paste interface were to reduce the water -cement ratio,
to add small amounts of micro silica, and to coat the aggregate faces with a
reactive layer. By pre-coating the aggregate particles with cement -micro silica
slurry, the bond strength increased, visible through a compressive strength
increase, and the porosit y at the transition zone was practically eliminated.
Detwiler [9]: They examined the orientation of calcium hydroxide crystals in the
interfacial zone and discovered that the crystals of calcium hydroxide in this
zone were strictl y oriented. They have seen that the axes of the crystals were
perpendicular to the aggregate surface and the degree of such orientation grew
currentl y with time, without being dependent on the sizes and t ypes of the
aggregate particles.
Mike Miller [17]: Reported that SCC could be successfully used in repair and
retrofitting projects where material has to be placed under pressure into confined
and highl y reinforced forms. Repair with normal concrete poses many challenges
while placin g the concrete into forms. Further the bonding between
reinforcement and paste in SCC is better as compared to normal concrete, thus
better transfer of stresses could be achieved using self compacting concrete.
19
3. SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE - BENEFITS , PROPERTIES & TESTS
With SCC that eliminates vibration work there are various kinds o f new
opportunities for improvin g the function of the structures. Potential benefits
regarding SCC are:
1. Improved work environment: There are many advantages in using SCC, not
least the improved work environment. Injuries related to 'hand -arm-vibration-
s yndrome' (HAVS), i.e. 'White fingers' on concrete workers, will be more or
less totall y eliminated in the future. The proportion of heavy work is reduced
and job sites can be significantl y quieter since concrete vibrators are
not needed. This is an advantage both for safet y on site and for the
neighborhood.
2. Cost-efficient production: The elimination of vibration work accelerates the
production process and improves qualit y of concrete structures, all of which
generate cost savings. The eliminatio n of vibration means rationalized
casting technique with less need of personnel and/or more rapid production
cycles and thereby presumptivel y reduced production costs. Smooth and
level high-qualit y surfaces can be produced directl y, without neith er
finishing work nor added materials costs for self -leveling flooring
compounds (e.g. Screed), which often is needed when concrete, is cast
traditionall y. In addition, there is some research indicating a more rapid
drying of SCC compared wi th normal concrete with the same w/c
ratio.
3. New opportunities with respect to structural design: There are also
opportunities for structural designers. For instance, densel y
reinforced structures, which are difficult or even imp ossible to construct
using traditional methods, can be cast with SCC. One example is the design
of the Millennium Tower in Vienna, which is described by Pichler (1999) as
it had been impossible to build without SCC.
4. Due to the 'filler effect', both the fi nal strength and strength development
increased for SCC.
20
3.2 Disadvantages and obstacles for the implementation of SCC
Despite the potential advantages of SCC compared to normal concrete, the
implementation is still strongl y limited. The obstacles for increased
implementation of SCC are both technical and non -technical. In comparison
with ordinary concrete, SCC requires extended control of both the mix design
and the concrete casting conditions. Small differences in mix proportions or in
in-situ conditions may result in a number of technical quality problems that may
act as obstacles for further use of SCC. Despite the intense research on SCC
and development of SCC, there are still unsolved technical problems and a
wide range of technical difficulties connected to SCC, which can be generall y
described as follows:
• Problems related to the ready-mix production process of SCC (e.g. More
extensive control of mix ingredients)
• On-site problems related to the fresh SC C (e.g. Increased formwork
pressure and thixotropical effects causing reduced flow)
• Problems related to the hardened SCC (e.g. low surface qualit y, reduced
fire resistance due to spalling, increased cracking due to earl y
shrinkage and incr eased drying shrinkage)
• Non-technical obstacles for SCC implementation concern
economical and non - economical issues, e.g.:
1. Economical obstacles (e.g. focus on added direct materials costs for
SCC in relation to direct potential cost -savings, instead of total
econom y perspective)
2. Non-economical obstacles (e.g. lack of knowledge on SCC and
unclear responsibility of the ready-mix producer versus the
contractor)
23
2. SCC based on viscosity -modifying agent (VMA): Viscosit y-modifying
agents (VMAs) are normall y water -soluble pol ymers. Addition of VMA
to SCC-mixes enhances the stabilit y of SCC and thereby prevents the
concrete from segregati on without usage of any filler. Similar to the
utilization of powder in SCC, addition of VMA increases the concrete
robustness against variations in the amount of mixing water, which
further may depend on moisture variations in fines, e.g. sand. Further
s ynergistic effect of VMA -SCC based on the fact that VMA leads to the
possibilit y of increasing the amount of SP. This can further increase the
self-compactabilit y without causing segregation. From an economical
point of view, most VMAs are expensive and in general more expensive
than powder. Also, the 'filler effect' may lead to cost savings, e.g.
reduction of cement content and faster strength development.
Research is ongoing with the a im of creating more cost -efficient VMA.
3. SCC based on both VMA and powder : In realit y, the difference between
powder-SCC and VMA -SCC may be hard to distinguish due to the fact
that small amounts of VMA or powder may be added to the both types of SCC.
For that reason, the third main concept of SCC i s based on both concepts i.e.
'SCC based on increased powder content' and 'SCC based on VMA use'.
Addition of VMA reduces the powder need and vice versa.
3.4 Rheology:
Rheology can be defined a s "the science of deformation and flow of
matter". Rheological methods are used in various sectors and with various aims.
Most rheological methods aim at understanding the interactions between
different ingredients in a product or sample, e.g. the relation between the
size/shape of particles in a solvent and the cohesion and viscosit y of the
solution. Further, the result of rheological measurements can be utilized for
qualit y control of raw materials and final products and/or for the design of
process equipment as for instance pumps and pipelines. Within the area of
concrete materials technology, various rheological methods are used to
examine the properties of the fresh concrete that also affect the p roperties
of the hardened concrete. Historically the most frequently used rheological
method has been to measure the 'slump'. This is used for quantification of
the 'consistency' of the concrete. The 'slump method' is a simple t esting
24
method that is well suited to field conditions on building sites. Other
rheological methods that have been used within concrete materials technology
are for example the remoulding test' to measure the 'workabilit y' of th e
fresh concrete. Since the introduction of SCC, the requirements of proper
rheological control of the fresh concrete have increased due to the fact that SCC
is more sensitive to variations of ingredients affecting for instance the self -
compacting abilit y and the segregation tendency. Another incentive to
increased focus on rheology methods is that they are needed for
optimized mix design regarding flow capacit y, stabilit y/robustness and passing
abilit y. For the testing of self -compacting properties, as for instance
deformabilit y, passing abilit y and segregation resistance on site, "simple"
rheological test methods are used, e.g. 'slump flow' and 'L -box'. More
scientific rheological methods i.e. rheometers and viscometers ha ve been
developed and are used but mostl y within research. They are seldom used
within the ready- mix concrete production.
Newtonian flow is the simplest t ype of flow, valid for instance for water.
For a Newtonian flow, the viscosit y (i.e. the slope of the line) is constant and
independent of the rate of shear. If a fluid is not flowing until a
specific level of shear stress is applied, the 'yield level', the fluid belongs to
the group of viscoplastic fluids, which as for instance i nclude concrete. This
type of flow is described as a 'Bingham flow'. The viscosit y of a Bingham
fluid is named as plastic viscosit y and is independent of the shear rate.
Thixotropy is a term that is commonl y used for describing one
important aspect of the rheology of concrete, especiall y SCC. If a material
shows thixotropic behavior, the flow characteristics are dependent on the
history of shear stress, e.g. the viscosity increases if the shear stress is set to
zero during a time period. When a shear stress is once again applied on the
material the viscosit y will recover and decrease to its original level.
Thixotropy is illustrated as a hysteresis effect between increasing and
decreasing the rate of shear.
In order to achieve proper self -compacting abilit y, the following
rheological parameters must be fulfilled:
1. High deformabilit y - by low yield value
2. High flow abilit y - by low yield value, low viscosit y and retention of
the kinet ic energy (to prevent particles from blocking by decreasing
25
the coarse aggregate content and thereby increasing the particle distance)
3. High segregation resistance - by maintaining moderate viscosity
4. High passing ability - by decreased shear stress in the matrix and
maintaining moderate viscosit y
Slump Flow test: The basic equipment used is the same as for the
conventional Slump test. The test method differs from the conventional one b y
the fact that the concrete sample placed into the mold is not rodded and when
the slump cone is removed the sam ple. The diameter of the spread of the
sample is measured, i.e. a horizontal distance is determined as opposed to the
vertical distance in the conventional Slump test. The Slump Flow test can give
an indication as to the consistency, filling abilit y and wo rkabilit y of SCC.
The SCC is assumed of having a good filling abilit y and consistency if the
diameter of the spread reaches values between 650mm to 800mm.
L-Box test: This method uses a test apparatus comprising of a vertical section
and a horizontal trou gh into which the concrete is allowed to flow on the
release of a trap door from the vertical section passing through reinforcing
bars placed at the intersection of the two areas of the apparatus. The
time that it takes the concrete to flow a distance of 200mm (T -20) and 400mm
(T-40) into the horizontal section is measured, as is the height of the concrete
at both ends of the apparatus (H1 & H2). The L -Box test can give an
indication as to the filling abilit y and passing abilit y
28
Figure: 3
.
Orimet test: The test is based on the principle of an orifice rheometer applied
to fresh concrete . The test involves recording of time that it takes for a
concrete sample to flow ou t from a vertical casting pipe through an
interchangeable orifice attached at its lower end. The shorter the Flow -Time,
the higher is the filling abilit y of the fresh mix. The Orimet test also shows
potential as a means of assessment of resistance to segregation on a site.
Slump Flow/J-Ring combination test: This test involves the sl ump cone
being placed inside a 300mm diameter steel ring attached to vertical
reinforcing bars at appropriate spacing (the J -Ring itself). The number of bars
has to be adjusted de pending on the maximum size aggregate in the SCC mix.
Like in the Slump Flow test, the diameter of the spread and the T -50 time are
recorded for the evaluation of SCC viscosit y. The Slump Flow/J -Ring
combination test is an improvement upon the Slump Flow test on its own as it
aims to assess also the passing abilit y of the fresh mix. In this respect, the
SCC has to pass through the reinforcing bars without separation of paste and
coarse aggregate.
GTM Segregation test: This is a very recent test measuring the separation of
aggregate in a sample after a period of time and wet sieving. The test has a
potential for detection of tendency to segregate. It completes the tests
(Slump-Flow, L-Box, etc.) carried out to estimate the filling abilit y in free or
shut-in environment by specifying the segregation resistance. This test can be
used in laboratory when developing a concrete mix, as well as on site, when
carrying out suitability tests on the delivered concrete.
30
3.8 Acceptance Test at Job Site
Figure: 6. Rational acceptance test at job site for self -compacting concrete
Compressive strength :
Of all concrete properties, the compressive strength is the most
tested. Requirements regarding strength class are normall y set for
each structure. Worldwide, there are standardized routines for compressive
strength testing both on cubes and cylinders. Concerning cubes, fresh
concrete is poured into special cube moulds directl y after the production
process on the ready-mix concrete plant and/or after the transportation to
the building site. In official norms and standards there are stipulated empirical
relations between compressive and tensile strength and between compressive
strength and E-modulus. Consequentl y, according to these norms and standards
the compressive strength class indirectly also indicates the tensile strength
and elastic modulus .
Usuall y, SCC leads to somewhat increased compressive strength
compared to NC when the same water/cement ratio is used. This effect
may be related to improved qualit y of the interface between aggregate
and paste. Further more, for SCC with added powder, e.g. limestone filler,
the strength normally is significantl y higher compared with SCC with less or no
powder content. This strength -gain effect is generall y named the 'filler effect'.
Tensile strength
According to European guidelines for SCC , the volume of paste (cement +
fines + water) has no significant effect on the concrete tensile strengt h.
Further, [10] assumes that the tensile strength of SCC may be safel y assumed to
be the same as the one for normal concrete for a given strength class and
maturit y. However Zhu and Gibbs studied the filler effect on both compressive
and tensile strength and reported significant strength gains in SCC. Regard
should be taken to the presumptive increase of the tensile strength either if the
effect is negative, e.g. increased requirements for reinforcement to control the
crack width, or if the tensile strength gain effect is positive, e.g. increased
potential for reduced deflections in slabs due to increased stif fness. Therefore it
32
is recommended that the real tensile strength is measured for each mix.
The tensile strength of concrete is much lower than the compressive
strength, because of the ease with which cracks can propagate under tensile
loads, and is us uall y not considered in design (it is often assum ed to be zero)
[18]. However, it is an important property, since cracking in concrete is mostl y
due to the tensile stresses that occur under load, or due to environmental
changes. The failure of concrete i n tension is governed by micro cracking,
associated particularly with the interfacial region between the aggregate particles
and the cement, also called in terfacial transition zone (ITZ) .
Investigations have shown that very fine cracks at the interfacial region
exist even prior to application of the load on concrete, due to the shrinkage [18].
These cracks remain stable up to about 30 percent or more of the ultimate load
and then begin to increase in length, width, and number. The overall stress under
which they develop is sensitive to the water -cement ratio of the paste, and this is
considered the stage of slow crack propagation. At 70 to 90 percent of the
ultimate strength, the cracks open through the cement paste and fine aggregate
and they bridge until a continuous crack pattern is formed. This represents the
fast crack propagation stage and, if the load is sustained, failure may take place
with time.
The tensile strength of concrete is most often evaluated using a split
cylinder test, in which a cylind rical specimen is placed on its side and loaded in
diametrical compression, so to induce transverse tension. Practicall y, the load
applied on the cylindrical concrete specimen induces tensile stresses on the plane
containing the load and relativel y high co mpressive stresses in the area
immediatel y around it. When the cylinder is compressed by the two plane -
parallel faceplates, situated at two diametricall y opposite points on the cylinder
surface then, along the diameter passing through the two points, the major tensile
stresses are developed which, at their limit, reach the fracture strength value,
fcs:
fcs = 2P/πdl ,
Where: P is the fracture compression force acting along the cylinder generatrix, d
is the cylinder diameter; l is the cylinder length.
In general, as age and strength increase, the ratio of tensile to compressive
strength (ft’/fc’) decreases [16]. Also, since crushed coarse aggregate seems to
33
improve tensile strength more than it does compressive strength, the ft’/fc’ ratio
also depends on the type of aggregate . It has been found that, compared to moist
curing; air curing reduces the tensile strength more than it does compressive
strength, probabl y because of the effect of drying shrinkage cracks. However,
incomplete consolidation and air entrainment affect the compressive strength
more than they do the tensile strength. Usuall y, the ratio of splitting tensile
strength to compressive strength ranges from about 0 .06 to 0.20 [2] .
Regarding the direct tensile strength, no relationship b etween the
values of tensile strength from the splitting test and those measured in direct
tension has been found yet. While it is commonl y assumed that splitting tensile
strength values are 5 to 12% higher than direct tensile strength values, this is not
always true [16]. Some recent studies have shown very little difference bet ween
the two values of tensile strength, and for some concretes, the direct tensile
strengths have been found to be slightly higher than the splitting strengths. It
may appear that the ratio of direct tensile strength to spli tting tensile strength
depends upon the strength level of the concrete and upon the maximum aggregate
size.
Modulus of elasticity
The elastic modulus (E -modulus) of concrete is to larger extent influenced by the
volume of aggregate and by the aggregate properties than by the paste
properties. In comparison with normal concrete the aggregate content of
SCC is smaller and the paste content of SCC is larger. Therefore the
elastic modulus of SCC is expected to be somewhat lower than in normal
concrete of the same strength class, which also is presented in several
reports. However, the differences are small and covered by the safe
assumptions inclu ded in the formulas within the norms. In cases where the
E-modulus is of special importance, its real value ought to be determined.
Creep
The basic creep ought to be somewhat bigger in SCC compared to NC. The
reason is the somewhat reduced amount of coarse aggregate in SCC
(including filler). The effect can however be expected to be small. The drying
creep depends mainly on the climate conditions. Since these are the same
for concrete used in the same condition, the difference in creep between SCC and
34
NC of the same strength class ought to be about the same as for basic creep.
Creep of SCC has been studied experimentall y but the result varies quite much.
More research is needed.
Shrinkage
There are three t ypes of shrinkage in cementitious porous materials, i.e.
plastic shrinkage (earl y drying shrinkage), autogenous shrinkage and drying
shrinkage. The mechanism and effect of each t ype can be explained briefl y as
follows:
2. Autogenous shrinkage:
Due to the fact that the volume of hydration products is smaller
than that of un -hydrated cement and water before hydration, a certain
internal drying of the concrete takes place as a result of hydration. This
drying causes a reduction in the relative humidit y (RH) in the concrete.
Therefore tensile stresses develop that may lead to shrinkage despite the
concrete is unable to dry outwards. This shrinkage is called 'autogenous'.
Autogenous shrinkage is as largest during the earl y phase and may result
in cracking evenl y through the section. Low w/c ratio, addition of silica
fume and large extent of fines are factors that increase the risk of autogenous
35
cracking. The reason is that these factors make the pore -structure finer, causing a
certain drying and a larger reduction in RH.
3. Drying Shrinkage:
When moisture graduall y dries out from the structure, shrinkage stresses
will occur due to negative pore water pressure caused by drying. Due to that the
drying is larger in the surface part of the structure, thin structures might
curve. One example is non - adhesive overl ays cast on top of concrete. If
free shrinkage is not possible due to constraint such as bond between
reinforced slabs cast on elements, cracking may occur perpendicular to the
constraint. In general, 'cracking reinforcement' is used to limit the crack
size.
There are several factors influencing shrinkage, e.g. paste content
versus aggregate content, pore structure of cement paste and elastic
modulus of aggregate. Especiall y with concern to earl y plastic shrink age,
surrounding conditions have large importance, e.g. weather and curing
conditions. Due to the fact that SCC in general contains less aggregate and more
paste than NC, the shrinkage therefore may be higher in SCC than in comparable
NC. If the w/c ratio is decreased though, the drying shrinkage will often
decrease while the autogenous and plastic shrinkage will increase, of which the
latter depends on decreased bleeding.
There are chemical additives introduced on the market with
the aim of minimizing shrinkage cracking, i.e. shrinkage reducing additive
(SRA). Through reducing the surface tension of the pore water, the
shrinkage stresses can be reduced. A negative effect of SRA is that the frost
resistance might be severel y reduced.
Drying :
The drying properties of SCC may differ in comparison with normal
concrete due to the presumptive refinement of the pore system in hardened
SCC. Especiall y for SCC including high level of powder content, the drying
properties may be different in comparison to NC . The reason why drying is
important is that a certain drying is required if deterioration of materials
placed in contact with the concrete, like organic flooring materials, shall be
avoided. Normall y RH-levels of the order 80 to 90% are required before such
36
materials can be applied. Besides, drying causes shrinkage.
A more horizontal isotherm in this RH -range brings about a lower
RH, a larger reduction in RH, fo r the same loss of water by drying outwards.
Furthermore, even if no drying outwards is possible, the drying caused by
cement reaction ('autogenous drying') will cause a reduction in RH. The
shape of the isotherm depends on the fin eness of the pore system; the
finer the pore system the more horizontal the isotherm, and the bigger the
reduction in RH for a given drying outwards, or a given degree of hydration.
Bond to reinforcement :
In comparison to normal concrete, S CC seems to lead to increased bond to
reinforcement bars. The most common reasons to poor bond when normal
concrete is used are insufficient vibration, concrete segregation and/or
bleeding, which lead to decreased qualit y of the hardened concre te
especiall y below the top reinforcement bars. A potential but not clarified
problem concerns settlement before SCC hardens, which might cause weak bond
to the lower part of top reinforcement .
Durability:
The durabilit y of SCC is probabl y ab out the same as for normal concrete
provided the same w/c ratio and cement type are used. Some potential problems
have however been pointed out:
1. Concrete containing limestone filler might be attacked by sulphate in
soil or water. The at tack consists of formation of thaumasite, which
might cause complete destruction of the concrete .
2. The effective diffusivit y of chloride ions might be increased in SCC
with limestone filler compared with normal concre te with the same w/c
ratio. The reason is unclear but might depend on a reduced chloride
binding capacit y in SCC containing limestone filler.
3. If self-compaction is not perfect it might be that the reinforcement
bars are not completel y covered by cement paste. The same will be the case if
the concrete settles due to earl y hydration while the reinforcement cage is
"locked" and unable to follow the sinking concrete. If this happens, the
resistance to reinforcement corrosio n will be impaired.
37
4. The more fluid concrete and the high dosage of superplasticiser might
cause an unstable air -pore system, which will reduce the frost resistance of the
concrete.
In normal concretes, the ITZ has less crack resistance than either the
aggregate or the hydrated cement paste, and so fracture occurs preferentiall y
in the ITZ [18]. If concretes with higher strengths have to be produced, it is
necessary to increase the strengths both of the paste matrix and of the paste -
40
aggregate bond. Unfortunatel y, reducing the water -cement ratio has a much
greater effect on the matrix strength than it does on the strength of the paste -
aggregate bond. Th us, the focus has been on improving the strength of the ITZ
itself, since fracture usuall y occurs not right at the physical interface . In this
respect, the most effective way of improving the ITZ is by the addition of
chemical and mineral admixtures. Currentl y, the use of silica fume and fl y ash
is the most effective way of densifying the ITZ, because they eliminate many of
the larger pores in this zone, making its structure more homogeneous [26]. They
also eliminate the growth of calcium hydroxide or transform the calcium
hydroxide into C -S-H by the pozzolanic reaction. However, other techniques are
now being examined, such as using chemical reagents, like for example,
surfactants or water glass in the conc rete mix [16]. It is considered that such
treatments may provide a more economical means of achieving better bonding.
41
4. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
43
4.1 Characteristics of Materials
Portland cement: Locall y made ordinary Portland cement 43 grade
(conforming to IS standar ds) with brand name - Khyber, was mainl y used for
this research. It has a relative densit y of 3.15 (as per manufacturer)
Water: The water used in the mix design was potable water from the water -
suppl y network system; so, it was free from suspended solids and organic
materials, which might have affected the properties of the fresh and hardened
concrete.
Coarse Aggregate : Two t ype crushed coarse aggregate used in the concrete
mixtures were procured from a crusher plant from Athwajan area of Srinagar
cit y viz. 20mm and 10mm.
Natural sand: The natural sand that has been used to cast the concrete cubes
and cylinders was clean. It was procured from Jhelum river from Athwajan
area of Srinagar cit y.
Coal Ash: Coal ash was procured from a boiler plant at Sheri -Kashmir
institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar.
Wood Ash: Wood ash was bakery unit from Jawahar Nagar area of Srinagr
cit y.
Superplasticizer: Super plasticizer with brand name of CICO PLAST SUPER
was procured manufactured by Cico Technologies Ltd, New Delhi. Cico plast
super is new generation concrete admixture based on modified Sulphonated
naphthalene formaldehyde , combining the properties of superplasticizer with
high degree of slump retention characteristics , high range water reducer and
also acts as water proofers for concrete, conforms to IS9103 -1999, IS:2645-
2003 and ASTM C -49 TYPE F&G.
The optimum dosage depends on t ype of mix, grade of concrete, cement
content and the desired workabilit y. As per the guidelines by the manufacturer
the dosage may vary from 0.4% to 2% by wt. of cement. It had a s pecific
gravit y of 1.18 ± 0.02 (as per manufacturer).
45
46
47
4.2 Normal Concrete Mix Design
These mix designs were formulat ed using IS -10262 code. The mixes were
prepared for:
1. One set of 3 C ylindrical Moulds of 150mm dia meter and 300mm height for
split tensile strength evaluation.
2. One set of 3 Cube Moulds of 150mm dimensions for compressive strength
evaluation.
48
4.3 Self-compacting Concrete Mix Design
The self-compacting concrete mix design used in the study was based on previous
work done Okamura, Ozawa and Abdul Hameed. Further guidelines laid down by
EFNARC have been taken into consideration.
These mixes were prepared f or:
1. One set of 3 C ylindrical Moulds of 150mm dia meter and 300mm height for
split tensile strength evaluation.
2. One set of 3 Cube Moulds of 150mm dimensions for compressive strength
evaluation.
49
50
CHAPTER 5 : RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5.1 Results of Tests for assessing self compactability of SCC mixes:
51
1.8
1.5
1.2 w/c =0.50
0.9 w/c =0.45
0.6 w/c =0.42
0.3
0
0 % WA 10 % WA 15 % WA 20 % WA
1.8
1.5
1.2 w/c =0.50
0.9 w/c =0.45
0.6 w/c =0.42
0.3
0
0 % CA 10 % CA 15 % CA 20 % CA
1.8
1.5
1.2 w/c =0.50
0.9 w/c =0.45
0.6 w/c =0.42
0.3
0
0 % CA 10 % CA 15 % CA 20 % CA
53
54
3.5
3
2.5
2 w/c =0.50
1.5 w/c =0.45
1 w/c =0.42
0.5
0
NC SCC 10 % WA 15 % WA 20 % WA
3.5
3
2.5
2 w/c =0.50
1.5 w/c =0.45
1 w/c =0.42
0.5
0
NC SCC 10 % CA 15 % CA 20 % CA
40
32
24
w/c =0.50
16 w/c =0.45
w/c =0.42
8
0
NC SCC 10 % WA 15 % WA 20 % WA
40
32
24 w/c =0.50
16 w/c =0.45
w/c =0.42
8
0
NC SCC 10 % CA 15 % CA 20 % CA
20 WA=20%
CA=10%
15
CA=15%
10
CA=20%
5 WA=10%+CA=5%
0 CA=10%+WA=5%
w/c= 0.50 w/c= 0.45 w/c= 0.42 WA=10%+CA=10%
2400
w/c =0.50
w/c =0.45
2200
w/c =0.42
2000
NC SCC 10 % WA 15 % WA 20 % WA
2600
2400
w/c =0.50
w/c =0.45
2200
w/c =0.42
2000
NC SCC 10 % CA 15 % CA 20 % CA
2350 CA=10%
CA=15%
2300 CA=20%
WA=10%+CA=5%
2250 CA=10%+WA=5%
w/c= 0.50 w/c= 0.45 w/c= 0.42 WA=10%+CA=10%
58
CONCLUSIONS
Taking into account the findings from this study, previousl y presented, the
following conclusions can be drawn:
1. It is verified that self compacting concrete could be produced with locall y
available waste materials- wood ash and coal ash.
2. That better strength is achi eved in SCC as compared to conventional concrete
even without fillers. This is because of better aggregate packing due the effect
of chemical admixtures viz. superplasticizer and viscosit y modifying
admixture.
3. That the optimum percentage partial cements replacement in SCC by both
wood ash and coal ash so as to achieve strength similar to normal concrete at
constant w/c ratio is 10%.
4. That decrease in the strength of SCC with the partial cement replacement b y
wood ash, from 10% replacement to 20% replacemen t, is gradual .
5. That strength of SCC with partial replacement by coal ash, beyond 10%
replacement, falls significantl y.
6. That SCC with partial cement replacement by combination of wood ash and
coal ash had better strength as compared to SCC with partial ceme nt
replacement by onl y one t ype of ash at constant w/c ratio.
7. Required quantit y of SP to achieve self compactabilit y increases with
decrease in w/c ratio whereas required quantit y of VWA to achieve sufficient
cohesiveness decreases with decrease in w/c ratio.
8. That quantit y of SP required to attain self compactabilit y in higher in case of
cement replacement by wood ash as compared to coal ash.
9. That the quantit y of VMA required to attain sufficient cohesiveness is higher
in case of cement replacement by coal ash is higher as compared to wood ash.
10.SCC mixes usuall y exhibit similar or smaller physical interfacial widths even
after 20% percentage partial cement replacement by wood ash, coal ash and
their combination as compared to conventional normal concrete. But, there is
no direct correlation between strength and physical interfacial width.
59
FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK
Further investigations have to be carried out regardin g the self-compacting
concrete with locally available waste materials so that its applicabili t y in
seismicall y active can be enhanced as introduction of waste materials makes SCC
more environmental friendl y and cost effective. Following studies in this
direction need to be done:
1. More research ought to be into presumptive obstacles of SCC use, e.g. risk of
rheological variations, high formwork pressure and earl y shrinkage cracking.
2. Effect of introduction of wood ash and coal ash on hardened properties like
permeabilit y, shrinkage, creep, durability, etc needs also to be studied.
3. Variation in initi al and final setting time with introduction of wood ash and
coal ash also need to be studied.
4. That if some other locall y available waste material could be introduced in
SCC- if being potentiall y beneficial for the SCC strength.
5. Also, a thorough investigat ion has to be carried out in order to obtain
an appropriate relationship between the water -cement ratio and the
aggregate-cement physical interface.
60
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Abdul Hameed, S. Ahamad and A.K Azad (2008), “Study of aggre gate proportioning
in SCC”, Arabian Journal of Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 5D.
2. Avram, C., I. Facaoaru, O. Mirsu, I. Filimon, and I. Tertea (1981), “Concrete
Strength and Strains”, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, pp.105 -133, 249-
251.
3. Bartos, J. M. (2000), “Measurement of Key Properties of Fresh Self-compacting
Concrete”, CEN/PNR Workshop, Paris.
4. Bijen, J. M. and M. de Rooij (1999), “Aggregate – Matrix Interfaces”, International
Conference on Concretes, Dundee, Scotland.
5. Bonen, D. and Shah, S. (2005), Fresh and hardened properties of self-consolidating
concrete, Journal of Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials No 7,
New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 14-26.
6. Corinaldesi, V., and Moriconi, G., (2004). "Durable fiber reinforced sel f-compacting
concrete", Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 34, pp.249 -254.
7. Corinaldesi and G. Moricoini (2004), “Self Compacting Concrete: A great
opportunity for recycling materials”, Conference on Environmental Physics, Italy;
Abstract ID No.: 327
8. Dehn, F., K. Holschemacher, and D. Weisse (2000), “Self-Compacting Concrete -
Time Development of the Material Properties and the Bond Behavior”, LACER No.
5, pp.115-123.
9. Detwiler, R. J., R. Wenk, and P. Monteiro (1988), “Texture of calcium hydroxide
near the aggregate cement paste interface”, Cement and Concrete Research Journal,
Vol. 18, Issue 5, pp.823-829.
10. ERMCO (2006), European ready-mixed concrete industry statistics year 2005,
Brussels: European Ready-mixed Concrete Organisation.
11. EFNARC, “Specifications and Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete” (2002),
EFNARC, UK (www.efnarc.org), February (2002), pp. 1 -32.
12. Ferraris, C. F., L. Brower, J. Daczko, C. Ozyldirim (1999), “Workability of Self -
Compacting Concrete”, Journal of Research of NIST, Vol. 104 , No. 5, pp.461-478.
13. Khayat, K.H. and Z. Guizani (1997), “Use of Viscosity-Modifying Admixture to
Enhance Stability of Fluid Concrete”, ACI Materials Journal, pp.332 -340.
14. Khayat, K. (1999), Workability, testing, and performance of self -consolidating
concrete, ACI Materials Journal No 3, Farmington Hills: American Concrete
Institute, pp 346-354. 219
61
15. Karim, A. K., Salgado, R. and Lovell, C. W. (1996), “Compaction of Fly and
Bottom Ash Mixtures,” 51st Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings.
16. Mindess, S., J. F. Young, and D. Darwin (2003), “Concrete”, Second Edition,
Prentice Hall.
17. Mike Miller , Villy Vaino and Jay Thomas, (2008) “SCC proves successful in repair
and strengthening projects”, Structure Journal.
18. Neville, A. M. (1993), “Properties of concrete”, Third Edition, Longman Scientific
& Technical, UK.
19. Okamura. H (1997), “Self-Compacting High-Performance Concrete”, Concrete
International, pp.50-54.
20. Ozawa, K. (1989), “Development of high performance concrete based on the
durability design of concrete structures”, EASEC-2, Vol. 1, pp.445-450.
21. Ouchi, M., M.Hibino, and H.Okamura (1996), “Effect of Superplasticizer on Self -
Compactability of Fresh Concrete”, TRR 1574, pp.37-40.
22. Ozyildirim, C.(2003), “Investigation of Self-consolidating Concrete”, Paper No. 01-
345, TRB.
23. Praveen Kumar and S.K. Kaushik (2006) “Self Compacting Concrete: A useful
material for earthquake resistant structures” 13 th SEE.
24. Ratchayut Kasemchaisiri and Somnuk Tangtermsirikul (2008) “Properties of Self -
Compacting concrete in Corporating Coal Ash as a Partial Replacement of Fine
Aggregate” 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2008.34.087
25. Subramanian, S. and D. Chattopadhyay, (2002) “Experiments for mix proportioning
of self-compacting concrete”, The Indian Concrete Journal, pp.13-20.
26. St John, D. A.(1998), “Concrete Petrography”, A handbook of investigative
techniques, Wiley & Sons, New York .
27. Swedish Concrete Association (2002), Self-compacting concrete -
recommendations for use, Report no. 10, Stockholm: Swedish Con crete Association
(in Swedish).
28. T.R. Naik and G. Moriconi (2005) “Environmental -friendly durable concrete made
with recycled materials for sustainable concrete construction” Materials Science
and Technology, Materials and Environment Enginee ring and Physics,
Marche Polytechnical University, Ancona, Italy.
29. Whiting, D (1979), “Effects of High-Range Water Reducers on Some Properties of
Fresh and Hardened Concretes”, Portland Cement Association, R & D Bulletin
061.01T.
62
APP EN D IX - A: No r ma l Co n cret e M ix Pro po rt i o ns
T hes e mi x d e si g n s wer e fo r mu l a ted u si n g IS -1 0 2 6 2 co d e. T h e mi x e s we r e p rep ar ed fo r:
3 . O ne se t o f 3 C yl i nd r ica l Mo u ld s o f 1 5 0 m m d ia me ter a nd 3 0 0 m m h ei g ht fo r sp li t te n si le
str e n gt h e val u at io n.
4. O ne se t o f 3 C ub e Mo u l d s o f 1 5 0 m m d i me n s io n s fo r co mp re s si v e s tre n g th e va l ua tio n.
No rma l co n cr et e m ix p r o p o rt io n s :
CA CA
De si g na tio n Gr ad e W ater Ce me n t FA W /c ra tio
2 0 mm 1 0 mm
NC1 M 20 0 .5 0 1 .0 1 .6 5 2 .0 2 1 .0 2 0 .5
NC2 M 25 0 .4 5 1 .0 1 .6 2 2 .1 4 1 .0 0 0 .4 5
NC3 M 30 0 .4 2 1 .0 1 .6 5 2 .0 2 1 .0 2 0 .4 2
APP EN D IX - B : S CC M i x P ro po rtio n s
SCC 1 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 1 .0 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .7 0 1 .0 0
SCC 2 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 1 .0 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .9 0 0 .8 0
SCC 3 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 1 .0 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 1 .0 0 0 .7 0
1W1 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 0 0 .0 0 0 .8 0 0 .9 0
1W2 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 5 0 .0 0 0 .8 5 0 .8 5
1W3 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .2 0 0 .0 0 0 .9 0 0 .8 0
1 C1 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 0 0 .7 5 0 .9 0
1 C2 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 5 0 .8 0 0 .9 5
1 C3 0 .5 0 0 .5 0 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .2 0 0 .8 5 1 .0 0
63
2W1 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 0 0 .0 0 1 .0 0 0 .8 0
2W2 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 5 0 .0 0 1 .1 0 0 .7 5
2W3 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .2 0 0 .0 0 1 .2 0 0 .7 0
2 C1 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 0 0 .9 0 0 .8 5
2 C2 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 5 0 .9 5 0 .9 0
2 C3 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .2 0 1 .0 0 0 .9 5
3W1 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 0 0 .0 0 1 .1 0 0 .7 0
3W2 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 5 0 .0 0 1 .2 0 0 .7 0
3W3 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .2 0 0 .0 0 1 .3 0 0 .6 5
3 C1 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .9 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 0 1 .1 0 0 .8 0
3 C2 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .1 5 1 .1 5 0 .8 0
3 C3 0 .4 2 0 .4 2 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .2 0 1 .2 0 0 .8 5
2 W 1 C0 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 0 0 .0 5 1 .2 5 0 .9 0
2 C1 W 0 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 5 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .0 5 0 .1 0 1 .2 0 1 .0 0
2 W 1 C1 0 .4 5 0 .4 5 0 .8 0 1 .7 6 1 .0 8 0 .5 1 2 0 .1 0 0 .1 0 1 .4 0 0 .9 5
Sl u mp flo w b y
Flo wi n g ab i li t y Mm 650 800
Ab ra ms co n e
V -F u n n el Fi ll i n g ab il it y Sec 8 12
V -F u n n el at T 5 Se gr e g at io n
Sec 0 +3
mi n u te s r es is ta n ce
64
Re s u lt s o f te st s d o n e fo r as se s si n g s el f co mp a ct ab il it y o f S C C mi xe s :
Sl u mp flo w b y V - F u n n el at T 5
De si g na tio n w/ c r at io V -F u n n e l( se c)
Ab r a ms co n e( m m) mi n u te s( S \s ec)
SCC 1 0 .5 0 680 09 11
SCC 2 0 .4 5 705 10 12
SCC 3 0 .4 2 705 10 12
1W1 0 .5 0 665 11 12
1W2 0 .5 0 670 11 13
1W3 0 .5 0 670 10 13
1 C1 0 .5 0 670 10 12
1 C2 0 .5 0 680 10 12
1 C3 0 .5 0 680 09 11
2W1 0 .4 5 695 10 13
2W2 0 .4 5 700 09 12
2W3 0 .4 5 690 09 11
2 C1 0 .4 5 710 08 10
2 C2 0 .4 5 705 09 12
2 C3 0 .4 5 690 10 12
3W1 0 .4 2 705 11 13
3W2 0 .4 2 695 12 14
3W3 0 .4 2 700 11 13
3 C1 0 .4 2 710 11 13
3 C2 0 .4 2 705 10 12
3 C3 0 .4 2 695 10 12
2 W 1 C0 0 .4 5 710 09 11
2 C1 W 0 0 .4 5 700 09 11
2 W 1 C1 0 .4 5 685 10 13
65
APP EN D IX - D: Sp li tti n g Te n si le Str eng th T est Re su lt s
T ab le s b elo w p r es e nt t he sp li tt i n g te n si le s tre n gt h s fo r no r ma l a nd s el f -co mp ac ti n g
co n cre te sp ec i me n s, a s t he y wer e t e sted a ft er b e i n g c ured fo r 2 8 d a ys .
67
144 2 .0 0
2 C1 W 0 130 1 .8 0 1 .9 1
137 1 .9 4
173 2 .4 0
2 W 1 C1 190 2 .6 0 2 .5 2
182 2 .5 8
68
475 2 1 .1 0
1 C1 515 2 2 .8 0 2 2 .0 8
508 2 2 .3 5
403 1 7 .7 0
1 C2 396 1 7 .4 0 1 7 .7 4
412 1 8 .1 2
341 1 5 .0 0
1 C3 324 1 4 .2 0 1 4 .6 1
333 1 4 .6 5
628 2 7 .6 0
2W1 634 2 7 .8 0 2 7 .8 6
641 2 8 .2 0
602 2 6 .4 0
2W2 588 2 5 .8 0 2 5 .6 3
562 2 4 .7 0
524 2 3 .0 0
2W3 509 2 2 .3 0 2 2 .4 6
502 2 2 .0 8
608 2 6 .7 0
2 C1 621 2 7 .3 0 2 7 .0 0
614 2 7 .0 1
559 2 4 .5 0
2 C2 542 2 3 .8 0 2 4 .1 8
551 2 4 .2 4
497 2 1 .8 0
2 C3 482 2 1 .2 0 2 1 .2 1
469 2 0 .6 3
751 3 3 .0 0
3W1 735 3 2 .3 0 3 2 .6 4
742 3 2 .6 4
712 3 1 .3 0
3W2 701 3 0 .8 0 3 1 .0 6
707 3 1 .1 0
604 2 6 .5 0
3W3 616 2 7 .1 0 2 6 .8 4
612 2 6 .9 2
721 3 1 .7 0
3 C1 728 3 2 .0 0 3 1 .7 3
716 3 1 .5 0
69
624 2 7 .4 0
3 C2 602 2 6 .4 0 2 6 .9 9
618 2 7 .1 9
591 2 6 .0 0
3 C3 567 2 4 .9 0 2 5 .3 7
573 2 5 .2 1
605 2 6 .6 2
2 W 1 C0 612 2 6 .9 0 2 6 .9 0
618 2 7 .1 9
572 2 5 .1 0
2 C1 W 0 594 2 6 .1 0 2 5 .6 0
582 2 5 .6 0
632 2 7 .8 0
2 W 1 C1 641 2 8 .2 0 2 8 .0 0
638 2 8 .0 0
De si g na tio n W ei g ht o f c ub e ( k g) De n si t y ( k g/ m 3 )
NC 1 7 .8 5 2330
NC 2 7 .8 0 2340
NC 3 7 .9 5 2355
SCC 1 8 .2 0 2440
SCC 2 8 .3 0 2466
SCC 3 8 .3 5 2474
1W1 8 .0 0 2370
1W2 8 .0 0 2370
1W3 7 .9 0 2340
1 C1 8 .0 0 2370
1 C2 7 .9 0 2340
1 C3 7 .9 0 2340
2W1 8 .1 0 2399
2W2 8 .1 0 2399
2W3 8 .0 0 2370
2 C1 8 .1 0 2399
2 C2 8 .0 0 2370
70
2 C3 8 .0 0 2370
3W1 8 .2 5 2445
3W2 8 .2 5 2445
3W3 8 .2 0 2429
3 C1 8 .2 0 2429
3 C2 8 .1 5 2414
3 C3 8 .1 5 2414
2 W 1 C0 8 .1 5 2414
2 C1 W 0 8 .1 0 2400
2 W 1 C1 8 .2 0 2429
Ap pe n di x- G: S ca n ni ng El ectro n M icro s co p e I ma g e s
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h ys i cal i n ter fa ce o f N C -2
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce S C C -2
71
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce N C -3
P ho to mi cr o g r ap h o f p h ys i cal i n ter fa ce S C C -3
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h ys i cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 1
72
P ho to mi cr o g r ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 2
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 3
73
P ho to micr o g rap h o f p h ys i cal i n ter fa ce 2 C2
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 1 C0
74
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 0 C1
P ho to mi cr o gr ap h o f p h y si cal i n ter fa ce 2 W 1 C1
75