Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
According to the definition of International Monetary Fund (IMF), “FDI refers to the
investments that Multinational Enterprises make as at least 10% capital partnership
with the investee and for the purposes of establishing long-term relationships with
other countries” (IMF, 1993).
Indirectly, FDI could be considered as a tool for both long-term relationships and
global integration within the capital movements. If compared to short-term loans and
other portfolio investments, FDI is a more consistent investment that creates a value
add for the economy receiving such an investment.
Depending on the criteria relating to the channels through which the FDI is entered
into the country and who are affected by the FDI, it could be said that the effects of
FDI might be different on different economies. However, the general approach is that
Foreign Direct Investments creates and/or increases the manufacturing of goods and
services in an economy by especially leaning towards the new investment areas or
by acquiring the existing firms and hence it could offer more contribution for the
investee economy. The said contribution could be experienced as an intermediation
for the country’s development, increasing the economy’s and existing firms’
managerial capacities and capacities for expanding into new markets, using the
financial resources more efficiently and increasing the employment level in the
economy. Moreover, FDI also makes way for the transfer of technology for the host
country and therefore it also contributes to the Human Capital capacity of the host
country.
Today the globalization has reached to upper levels and hence FDI becomes a very
important factor for the developing countries (which obviously have low levels of
capital accumulation and development facilities). Therefore, such developing
countries try to create a competitive environment in order to attract more and more
FDI and hence to increase the level of welfare and economic development in the
country. Developing countries do so by freeing the trade regimes, by enhancing
economic cooperation and/or by offering privilege incentives for the MNEs. However,
the MNEs that plan to invest their capital and resources in other countries first decide
whether the country (or the sector) is even suitable for the investment, keeping in
consideration the country’s social, cultural, corporate, economic, and financial
conditions. Therefore, FDI depends on many factors.
2
A lot of studies have been conducted on the factors affecting the FDI since the trade
barriers have been lifted in the late 80’s. According to the common findings of these
studies, FDI is relatively more likely to be made in open economies, which have high
level of economic growth rate, wide market, low level of labor price and human
capital stock. However, it could be seen that the recent studies which are conducted
related to FDI focus more on the corporate factors. The main findings from such
recent studies show that an improvement in the corporate quality indicators including
high level of bureaucracy quality, political consistency, guarantee of the property
rights, advanced democracy, not having corruption, and not having societal conflict
and threats are as effective as macroeconomic factors for FDI inflows.
Another key concept in the analysis of across border capital movement is the country
risk. Considering that MNEs prefer the countries which offer low risk and high return
levels, it could be said that countries’ risk prims are important guidance for investors.
In the literature review related to country risk analysis, studies relatively focus on the
political risk. However, country risk is not a single component factor. Political
consistency is an important factor affecting the FDI inflows however, economic and
financial uncertainty also impact the investment decisions taken by the investors. In
this study, it is targeted to reveal the relationship between country risk and its
components (economic, financial and political risk), and FDI flows.
3
authors, country risk could be ordered as the risks caused by economic, financial
and political environment.
“Economic risk defines the unexpected developments in the general structure of the
economy in such a way that the international investors may make changes in their
investment projects” (Topal & Gül, 2016). The change in the economic risk level is
measured by the changes in the strengths and weaknesses of the country’s
economy. “If the economy’s strengths are enough to compensate the weaknesses,
this situation could be interpreted as the economic risk is decreased” (PRS, 2014).
Foreign investors prefer those countries which have wider markets in order to take
benefit of large scale of economies. For this reason, as an indicator of market
growth, economic growth and income per capita are among the variables used in
measurement of economic risks. Other economic indicators used to measure the
economic risk are budget deficit, inflation rate and current account balance. If the
budget deficit becomes chronic in a country, it reveals the weaknesses of the country
as increasing the country’s debt stock and indirectly its economic vulnerability. At the
same time, budget deficit affects the country’s investment-saving balance as creating
breakdowns for inflation, current account deficit and foreign trade indicators. On the
other hand, high level of inflation rates decrease the real values of investment and
create low returns to investors so that it causes value losses for future earnings of
investors. Additionally, high level of inflation increases the balance of payment
deficits and increase uncertainties and investment risk. Therefore, any change in the
abovementioned factors is given importance by the foreign capital owners as it may
change the risk perception.
“Financial risk is defined as the decrease in ability of country to meet its liabilities
toward abroad” (White & Han, 2006). A country, which has high level of financial risk,
most probably would face a financial crisis. “Its economy’s foreign debt stock, export
income level, current account deficit, international liquidity and exchange rate
consistency are used to determine its financial risk prime” (PRS, 2014).
The increase of a country’s foreign debt stock in the national income increases its
financial risk level as it decreases its ability to meet its foreign liabilities. Foreign
companies are very sensitive to financial risk- they prefer making investment in the
countries which have lower levels of foreign debt stock and indirectly low level of
financial risk. The presence of a chronic current account deficit along with high level
of foreign debt decreases the stability of the exchange rate and affects international
liquidity of the country. In turn, the instability of the exchange rates affect FDIs in a
negative fashion on account of causing serious uncertainties for the outside
investors. A high level of foreign currency inflow is required in order to be able to
close the BOP deficit and sustain the exchange rate stability. This is particularly
4
difficult for the countries whose imports are more than their exports because it is
almost impossible to change this outlook in the short run. Therefore, it could be
safely said that ‘financially risky’ economies find it very difficult to attract sufficient
level of FDI.
Political risk reflects the quality of the corporate structure of a country. Political
inconsistencies a low level of corporate quality indicates higher level of Political risk
and decreases the return on investment for the investors. Political consistency,
bureaucracy quality, social compliance, law superiority, level of corruption, and
democracy are the most important indicators for corporate quality of an economy.
FDI especially include high levels of sunk costs which makes MNEs more sensitive
to uncertainties. Such sunk costs also include the costs paid to establish good
relationships with the host country and the costs to obtain necessary information.
5
Literature Review
At present, in the globalized and integrated world economy, FDI is considered an
important factor for the sustainable development and growth processes of the less
developed and developing countries i.e. the countries that have low level of savings
and insufficient level of capital accumulation. Although different results could be
found in the various studies conducted in the subject matter, strong proofs are found
showing that the risks carried by the host countries have powerful effects on the
inflow of Foreign Direct Investment. In this section of the study, summary information
about the findings of the studies relating to the subject matter is presented keeping a
chronological order.
On analyzing the determinants of FDI made in Central and East European Countries
from OECD countries, Carstensen and Toubal (2003) reaches the findings that in
addition to traditional determinants including low labor force cost, market potential,
privatization level and qualified labor force, a decrease in the country risk as a
transition-specific factor has a positive effect on the inflow of FDI.
In the studies conducted by Sekkat and Varoudakis (2007), where they worked on
Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries, they determined that the FDI
increased as an impact of a decrease in the economic and political risk.
Gast and Herrmann (2008) conducted a research on the determinants of FDI. They
reached the findings which show the presence of a negative relationship between
the country risk and Foreign Direct Investment as a result of cross section analysis.
Therefore, researchers concluded that the countries which have high level of political
and economic stability and low level of risk are more attractive in terms of FDI.
In the regression analysis conducted by Palacios and Griffin (2011), the correlation
between FDI and 13 risk variables including financial, political and macroeconomic
risks are analyzed for 6 Latin America Countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Mexico and Venezuela). The regression assumption, which was created for this
purpose, concluded a powerful and negative directed correlation between countries’
risk levels and FDI.
6
In their studies where they considered 94 countries with different income levels,
Khan and Akbar (2013) analyzed the relationship between political risk and FDI. In
the analysis, 12 different risk component taken from ICRG were used. The empirical
proofs at the end of the analysis show that FDI has negative direction with most of
the political risk indicators of all income groups while it is more powerful on upper-
middle income level countries.
In their studies Ali et al. (2014) analyzed whether financial risk affects FDI inflows to
Pakistan economy. The time series analysis, which was conducted with 4 different
financial risk indicators, it was found out that foreign debt services, exchange rate
and current account had negative effect and efficient use of foreign debt had positive
effect on FDI.
According to Sanjo (2012), who shared a similar idea, the important factor on
investment decision for foreign firms was not the host countries’ high or low level of
risks but whether the market was large enough to make investment. In the countries
where political risk is high, investors would prefer making investment to risky country
if its market size is larger comparing to less risky countries’ market size.
In the time series analysis, which they made for Turkey, Emir et al. (2013) concluded
that the relationship between FDI and country risk differentiate in the short and long
terms. Accordingly, while there is not a meaningful relationship between the related
variables in the short term, FDI is affected from country risk in the long term.
Finally, in the study where Kariuki (2015) researched on FDI determinants for African
union countries, the results were reached that economic risk had negative effects on
FDI while political and financial risks did not have any effects.
7
Data and Methodology
Data
In this study, annual data for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23 countries
(provided in Appendix-1) are used. Descriptive information about the variables that
have been used in this study is provided in Table-1. FDI statistics (provided in
Appendix 2) are obtained from Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) Database. The statistics related to country risk and
components have been obtained from World Bank Open Database, IMF Database,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Database and
PRS-ICRG (Political Risk Services-International Country Risk Guide) which is a
Canada registered risk evaluation firm. As have been focusing on risk evaluation up
to day, PRS Group regularly calculates annually 3 risk index for 140 countries.
ECO-R Economic Risk. The increase in index value which has value
ranging from 0 to 50 shows the decrease in economic risk
Methodology
Detailed information about ICRG risk methodology is given below:
The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) rating comprises of 22 variables in
three subcategories of risk i.e. Political Risk, Financial Risk, and Economic Risk.
A separate index is created for each of the subcategories.
The Political Risk Index is based on 100 points, Financial Risk Index is based on 50
points, and Economic Risk Index is based on 50 points. The Composite Country Risk
is obtained by dividing the sum of these 3 indices by two. The composite scores,
8
ranging from zero to 100, are then broken into categories from Very Low Risk (80 to
100 points) to Very High Risk (zero to 49.9 points).
The Political Risk Rating includes 12 weighted variables covering both political and
social attributes. On the other hand, the Financial and Economic Risk Ratings
include five weighted variables, each.
9
subcomponents, each with a maximum score of 4 points and a minimum score of 0
points. A score of 4 points equates to Very Low Risk and a score of 0 points to Very
High Risk.
The subcomponents are:
1. Government Unity
2. Legislative Strength
3. Popular Support
10
each with a maximum score of four points and a minimum score of 0 points. A score
of 4 points equates to Very Low Risk and a score of 0 points to Very High Risk.
The subcomponents are:
1. War
2. Cross-Border Conflict
3. Foreign Pressures
F. Corruption – 6 Points
This is an assessment of corruption within the political system of a country. Such
corruption is a threat to foreign investment because it reduces the efficiency of
government and business by enabling people to assume positions of power through
patronage rather than ability, it distorts the economic and financial environment, and
it also introduces an inherent instability into the political process.
A full-scale military regime poses the greatest risk. In the short term a military regime
may provide a new stability and thus reduce business risks. However, in the longer
term the risk will almost certainly rise, partly because the system of governance will
be become corrupt and partly because the continuation of such a government is
likely to create an armed opposition.
H. Religious Tensions – 6 Points
Religious tensions may arise due to the domination of the society and/or governance
by a single religious group, the desire of a single group to dominate governance, the
suppression of religious freedom, the desire of a religious group to express its own
identity, separate from the country as a whole.
The risk involved in these situations may range from inexperienced people imposing
inappropriate policies through civil dissent to civil war.
11
K. Democratic Accountability – 6 Points
This is a measure of how responsive government is to its people, on the basis that
the less responsive it is, the more likely it is that the government will fall, peacefully
in a democratic society, but possibly violently in a non-democratic one.
These strengths and weaknesses are assessed by assigning risk points to a pre-set
group of factors, termed economic risk components. The minimum number of points
that can be assigned to each component is zero, while the maximum number of
points depends on the fixed weight that component is given in the overall economic
risk assessment. In every case the lower the risk point total, the higher the risk, and
the higher the risk point total, the lower the risk.
The components of the Economic Risk along with their weights are given below:
12
Components of Economic Risk
A. GDP per Head – 5 Points
The estimated GDP per capita, converted into US dollars, is expressed as a
percentage of the average GDP per Capita of the world. The risk points are then
assigned according to the following scale:
Table 3.1
GDP per Capita
% of Average GDP Capita of the Points
World
250 plus 5
200.0 to 249.9 4.5
150.0 to 199.9 4
100.0 to 149.9 3.5
75.0 to 99.9 3
50.0 to 74.9 2.5
40.0 to 49.9 2
30.0 to 39.9 1.5
20.0 to 29.9 1
10.0 to 19.9 0.5
Up to 9.9 0
Table 3.2
Real GDP Growth
Change % Points
6 plus 10
5 to 6 9.5
4 to 5 9
3 to 4 8.5
2.5 to 3 8
2 to 2.5 7.5
1.5 to 2 7
1 to 1.5 6.5
0.5 to 1 6
0 to 0.5 5.5
-0.5 to 0 5
-1 to -0.5 4.5
-1.5 to -1 4
13
-2 to -1.5 3.5
-2.5 to -2 3
-3 to -2.5 2.5
-3.5 to -3 2
-4 to -3.5 1.5
-5 to -4 1
-6 to-6 0.5
Below -6 0
Table 3.4
Annual Inflation Rate
Change % Points
<2 10
2 to 3 9.5
3 to 4 9
4 to 6 8.5
6 to 8 8
8 to 10 7.5
10 to 12 7
12 to 14 6.5
14 to 16 6
16 to 19 5.5
19 to 22 5
22 to 25 4.5
25 to 31 4
31 to 41 3.5
41 to 51 3
51 to 66 2.5
66 to 81 2
81 to 96 1.5
96 to 111 1
111 to 130 0.5
130 plus 0
14
year in the national currency. The risk points are then assigned according to the
following scale:
Table 3.4
Budget Balance
% of GDP Points
4 plus 10
3 to 4 9.5
2 to 3 9
1 to 2 8.5
0 to 1 8
-1 to 0 7.5
-2 to -1 7
-3 to -2 6.5
-4 to -3 6
-5 to -4 5.5
-6 to -5 5
-7 to -6 4.5
-8 to -7 4
-9 to -8 3.5
-10 to -9 3
-12 to -10 2.5
-15 to -12 2
-20 to -15 1.5
-25 to -20 1
-30 to -25 0.5
Below -30 0
Table 3.5
Current Account
% of GDP Points
10 plus 15
8 to 10 14.5
6 to 8 14
4 to 6 13.5
2 to 4 13
1 to 2 12.5
0 to 1 12
15
-1 to 0 11.5
-2 to -1 11
-4 to -2 10.5
-6 to -4 10
-8 to -6 9.5
-10 to -8 9
-12 to -10 8.5
-14 to -12 8
-16 to -14 7.5
-17 to -16 7
-18 to -17 6.5
-19 to -18 6
-20 to -19 5.5
-21 to -20 5
-22 to -21 4.5
-23 to -22 4
-24 to -23 3.5
-25 to -24 3
-27 to -25 2.5
-30 to -27 2
-32.5 to -30 1.5
-35 to -32.5 1
-40 to -35 0.5
Below -40 0
Overall, an economic risk rating of 0.0% to 24.5% indicates a Very High Risk; 25.0%
to 29.9% High Risk; 30.0% to 34.9% Moderate Risk; 35.0% to 39.9% Low Risk; and
40.0% or more Very Low Risk. Once again, however, a poor economic risk rating
can be compensated for by a better political and/or financial risk rating.
16
done by assigning risk points to a pre-set group of factors, termed financial risk
components. The minimum number of points that can be assigned to each
component is zero, while the maximum number of points depends on the fixed
weight that component is given in the overall financial risk assessment. In every case
the lower the risk point total, the higher the risk, and the higher the risk point total the
lower the risk.
The components of the Economic Risk along with their weights are given in the
following table:
17
Analysis
The relationship between FDI inflows and country risk is analyzed through panel
data analysis. Panel data analysis, which has two dimensions as time series and
cross section, offers advantages as to have many amounts of observation and
freedom degree, to be able to observe the unobservable effects (unit and time
effects) and assumption on complex behavioral models. Below mentioned two
models are assumed in the econometric analysis under this project. In Model (1), the
country risk components (economic, financial and political risk) in the related
countries are regressed against the FDI inflows, and in Model (2), the Composite
country risk in the related countries is regressed against FDI inflows.
18
3. Austria- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
5. Brazil- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship between
the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in a
Multivariate regression analysis.
19
7. Germany- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis
10. India- Model 1 regression analysis showed a significant relationship between FDI
inflow and Political Risk and between FDI inflow and Economic Risk but it showed no
significant relationship between FDI and Financial Risk.
20
11. Indonesia- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
12. Ireland- Model 1 regression analysis showed a very strong and significant
positive relationship between FDI inflow and the Financial Risk Rating. However, the
relationship between FDI inflow and other two risk components of the Country Risk
i.e. Economic and Political Risk was not that significant. Also it showed a decent
relationship between the FDI and the Risk Components in a multivariate regression
analysis.
13. Japan- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
21
15. Poland- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
16. Portugal- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
17. Russia- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
22
19. Spain- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
20. Switzerland- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
21. Turkey- Model 1 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between the FDI and the components of the Country risk, neither individually, nor in
a Multivariate regression analysis.
23
23. United States- Model 1 regression analysis showed a somewhat significant
relationship between FDI inflow and Financial Risk but it showed no significant
relationship between FDI and other 2 components of the Country Risk i.e. Economic
and Political Risk.
Model II
1. Argentina- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.107636442
R Square 0.115856037
Adjusted R Square -0.07827025
Standard Error 3858.941254
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.6352
R Square 0.4035
Adjusted R Square 0.3493
Standard Error 18573.2003
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.365496462
R Square 0.533587664
Adjusted R Square 0.454822906
Standard Error 7368.277737
Observations 13
24
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.4265
R Square 0.5819
Adjusted R Square 0.5075
Standard Error 32480.4150
Observations 13
5. Brazil- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship between
FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.1411
R Square 0.5199
Adjusted R Square 0.4492
Standard Error 25932.7650
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.5361
R Square 0.7874
Adjusted R Square 0.6499
Standard Error 62166.6925
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.1664
R Square 0.3277
Adjusted R Square 0.2407
Standard Error 26837.2204
Observations 13
25
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.2485
R Square 0.0617
Adjusted R Square -0.0236
Standard Error 1483.1642
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.0971
R Square 0.5094
Adjusted R Square 0.4281
Standard Error 7398.0330
Observations 13
10. India- Model 2 regression analysis showed a significant relationship between FDI
and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.1235
R Square 0.8153
Adjusted R Square 0.7426
Standard Error 11319.2078
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.3663
R Square 0.8342
Adjusted R Square 0.7555
Standard Error 6683.7023
Observations 13
12. Ireland- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
26
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.238267506
R Square 0.056771404
Adjusted R Square -0.02897665
Standard Error 61023.88027
Observations 13
13. Japan- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.3718
R Square 0.4383
Adjusted R Square 0.3599
Standard Error 9250.6610
Observations 13
14. Mexico- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.2396
R Square 0.6574
Adjusted R Square 0.5828
Standard Error 7769.8067
Observations 13
15. Poland- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.0396
R Square 0.6016
Adjusted R Square 0.5292
Standard Error 5565.9254
Observations 13
16. Portugal- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
27
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.230314014
R Square 0.553044545
Adjusted R Square 0.473304231
Standard Error 2825.596888
Observations 13
17. Russia- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.3135
R Square 0.5983
Adjusted R Square 0.5163
Standard Error 17112.1031
Observations 13
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.5840
R Square 0.8475
Adjusted R Square 0.7700
Standard Error 2736.1104
Observations 13
19. Spain- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.2902
R Square 0.6842
Adjusted R Square 0.6010
Standard Error 20441.4796
Observations 13
20. Switzerland- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
28
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.1517
R Square 0.2300
Adjusted R Square 0.1658
Standard Error 23548.1828
Observations 13
21. Turkey- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.1810
R Square 0.3277
Adjusted R Square 0.2552
Standard Error 4612.0270
Observations 13
22. United Kingdom- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant
relationship between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.4266
R Square 0.6820
Adjusted R Square 0.6076
Standard Error 56579.0528
Observations 13
23. United States- Model 2 regression analysis did not show a significant relationship
between FDI and Composite Country Risk Rating.
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.3393
R Square 0.6151
Adjusted R Square 0.5346
Standard Error 108349.5872
Observations 13
29
Conclusion
In this study, the relationship between country risk and FDI inflows is analyzed.
According to the theoretic studies, foreign investors (firms) try to avoid risk and
uncertainty. Therefore there is a negative relationship between risk and investment
preferences. In the empirical literature review in which the studies conducted in this
subject is mentioned, it could be seen that the theoretic approach that FDI is affected
from country risk in negative means is relatively supported.
Additionally empirical literature findings include that financial risk has weak or
meaningless, and economic and especially political risk have powerful effects on FDI
inflows. With the analysis result in this project report, parallel results are obtained
with the prior studies. The opposite directed relationship between risk and
investment preferences is brought forward with this study in case of the Developing
Countries like India and Indonesia. On the other hand, it was found that in case of
the developed countries (especially European Countries), no such meaningful
relationship was found.
In this study, it is also found that financial risk and economic risk does not have
meaningful effect on FDI inflows in case of most of the countries under the analysis,
while the decrease in level of political risk affect FDI inflows in positive ways for
some of the countries in the consideration set.
According to the findings, it could be said that developing countries should establish
more quality corporate structure and consistent macroeconomic structure in order to
attract more FDI. Therefore, the policies which are implemented in this purpose
make developing countries more attractive for foreign investors as positively
affecting the risk perception.
30
Appendices
Appendix 1. Annual data for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23 Countries
1.1 GDP per Capita (as a % of Global Average GDP per Capita)
Countries 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 47% 55% 67% 84% 76% 96% 119% 121% 121% 114% 128% 118% 134%
Australia 317% 336% 382% 462% 398% 484% 582% 633% 634% 581% 528% 465% 502%
Austria 358% 379% 437% 482% 447% 437% 479% 453% 473% 482% 412% 417% 441%
Belgium 345% 362% 414% 452% 419% 414% 445% 417% 434% 442% 376% 385% 404%
Brazil 44% 55% 68% 82% 80% 105% 123% 115% 114% 112% 82% 81% 92%
China 16% 20% 25% 32% 36% 43% 53% 59% 66% 72% 75% 76% 82%
Germany 324% 340% 390% 426% 389% 390% 437% 411% 434% 448% 385% 394% 415%
Greece 210% 231% 269% 298% 277% 251% 242% 207% 204% 203% 169% 167% 174%
Hungary 105% 107% 130% 147% 122% 122% 132% 120% 127% 132% 116% 120% 133%
Indonesia 12% 15% 17% 20% 21% 29% 34% 34% 34% 33% 31% 33% 36%
India 7% 7% 9% 9% 10% 13% 14% 13% 14% 15% 15% 16% 18%
Ireland 475% 507% 572% 571% 486% 454% 487% 457% 483% 517% 576% 598% 647%
Japan 347% 330% 329% 367% 381% 415% 449% 453% 377% 355% 322% 363% 358%
Mexico 75% 83% 88% 91% 73% 84% 92% 93% 97% 99% 87% 79% 83%
Poland 75% 84% 105% 131% 108% 117% 130% 123% 129% 134% 117% 116% 129%
Portugal 175% 185% 212% 231% 215% 210% 216% 192% 202% 206% 180% 185% 197%
Russia 50% 65% 85% 109% 80% 100% 134% 144% 149% 132% 87% 82% 100%
South Africa 49% 51% 56% 53% 54% 68% 74% 70% 64% 60% 54% 49% 57%
Spain 247% 266% 305% 332% 302% 287% 297% 266% 272% 276% 241% 248% 263%
Switzerland 513% 537% 593% 676% 652% 696% 825% 779% 794% 808% 765% 745% 748%
Turkey 69% 75% 91% 101% 84% 100% 106% 109% 117% 113% 102% 101% 98%
United Kingdom 389% 413% 468% 436% 357% 363% 386% 390% 398% 436% 413% 377% 370%
United States 413% 433% 448% 451% 438% 451% 464% 480% 492% 510% 526% 537% 555%
31
1.3 Annual Inflation Rate
Countries 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 9.60% 10.90% 8.80% 8.60% 6.30% 10.50% 9.80% 10.00% 10.62% 38.00% 26.00% 41.00% 25.68%
Australia 2.66% 3.55% 2.36% 4.35% 1.77% 2.86% 3.33% 1.71% 2.45% 2.51% 1.48% 1.28% 1.97%
Austria 2.10% 1.69% 2.20% 3.23% 0.40% 1.69% 3.55% 2.57% 2.12% 1.46% 0.80% 0.97% 2.23%
Belgium 2.54% 2.33% 1.82% 4.49% -0.01% 2.33% 3.35% 2.63% 1.25% 0.49% 0.62% 1.77% 2.22%
Brazil 6.87% 4.18% 3.64% 5.68% 4.89% 5.04% 6.64% 5.40% 6.20% 6.33% 9.03% 8.74% 3.45%
China 1.78% 1.65% 4.82% 5.93% -0.73% 3.17% 5.53% 2.61% 2.57% 2.06% 1.54% 2.12% 1.52%
Germany 1.95% 1.79% 2.26% 2.76% 0.24% 1.15% 2.49% 2.12% 1.60% 0.78% 0.13% 0.38% 1.70%
Greece 3.49% 3.31% 2.99% 4.23% 1.35% 4.70% 3.12% 1.03% -0.85% -1.39% -1.09% 0.01% 1.14%
Hungary 3.56% 3.93% 7.96% 6.04% 4.21% 4.86% 3.93% 5.65% 1.73% -0.23% -0.06% 0.39% 2.35%
India 3.67% 6.75% 5.93% 9.19% 10.62% 9.51% 9.26% 9.91% 9.43% 5.93% 4.90% 4.52% 3.59%
Indonesia 10.45% 13.11% 6.41% 10.23% 4.39% 5.13% 5.36% 4.28% 6.41% 6.39% 6.36% 3.53% 3.81%
Ireland 2.18% 2.68% 2.88% 3.12% -1.69% -1.61% 1.21% 1.90% 0.53% 0.30% -0.03% -0.21% 0.26%
Japan -0.56% 0.23% 0.07% 1.38% -1.36% -0.61% -0.28% -0.03% 0.35% 2.75% 0.81% -0.12% 0.48%
Mexico 3.99% 3.63% 3.97% 5.12% 5.30% 4.16% 3.41% 4.11% 3.81% 4.02% 2.72% 2.82% 6.04%
Poland 2.18% 1.28% 2.46% 4.16% 3.80% 2.58% 4.24% 3.56% 0.99% 0.05% -0.87% -0.66% 2.08%
Portugal 2.13% 3.05% 2.42% 2.65% -0.90% 1.39% 3.55% 2.78% 0.44% -0.16% 0.51% 0.64% 1.56%
Russia 12.69% 9.67% 9.01% 14.11% 11.65% 6.85% 8.44% 5.07% 6.75% 7.82% 15.53% 7.04% 3.68%
South Africa 3.35% 4.62% 7.15% 11.53% 6.60% 4.26% 4.99% 5.62% 5.76% 6.09% 4.58% 6.34% 5.27%
Spain 3.38% 3.56% 2.84% 4.13% -0.24% 2.04% 3.05% 2.44% 1.53% -0.19% -0.63% -0.34% 2.04%
Switzerland 1.17% 1.06% 0.73% 2.43% -0.48% 0.69% 0.23% -0.69% -0.22% -0.01% -1.14% -0.43% 0.53%
Turkey 8.18% 9.60% 8.76% 10.44% 6.25% 8.57% 6.47% 8.89% 7.49% 8.85% 7.67% 7.78% 11.14%
United Kingdom 2.04% 2.35% 2.31% 3.60% 2.18% 3.30% 4.46% 2.80% 2.57% 1.47% 0.05% 0.64% 2.69%
United States 3.37% 3.22% 2.87% 3.81% -0.32% 1.64% 3.14% 2.07% 1.47% 1.61% 0.12% 1.27% 2.14%
32
1.5 Current Account as a percentage of GDP
Countries 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 2.77% 2.77% 2.09% 1.48% 2.16% -0.38% -1.01% -0.37% -2.14% -1.62% -2.73% -2.72% -4.96%
Australia -5.95% -5.87% -6.71% -4.78% -4.66% -3.68% -3.08% -4.30% -3.38% -3.07% -4.65% -3.29% -2.57%
Austria 2.26% 3.29% 3.80% 4.49% 2.60% 2.86% 1.63% 1.48% 1.94% 2.47% 1.73% 2.48% 1.95%
Belgium 2.09% 1.90% 1.96% -1.00% -1.09% 1.75% -1.07% -0.05% -0.32% -0.87% -1.03% -0.59% 0.73%
Brazil 1.53% 1.17% 0.08% -1.78% -1.48% -3.60% -2.92% -3.40% -3.22% -4.14% -2.88% -1.32% -0.35%
China 5.79% 8.42% 9.95% 9.15% 4.77% 3.91% 1.80% 2.52% 1.55% 2.26% 2.76% 1.82% 1.36%
Germany 4.60% 5.67% 6.74% 5.59% 5.74% 5.63% 6.12% 7.02% 6.71% 7.44% 8.91% 8.52% 7.96%
Greece -8.87% -11.49% -15.19% -15.11% -12.35% -11.38% -10.00% -3.83% -2.04% -1.63% -0.81% -1.73% -1.75%
Hungary -6.98% -7.05% -7.09% -6.96% -0.81% 0.30% 0.76% 1.74% 3.77% 1.47% 2.71% 6.17% 3.18%
India -1.31% -1.06% -0.66% -2.56% -2.08% -3.42% -3.44% -5.07% -2.54% -1.36% -1.09% -0.55% -1.51%
Indonesia 0.04% 2.72% 2.22% 0.02% 1.83% 0.69% 0.20% -2.66% -3.17% -3.08% -2.03% -1.83% -1.59%
Ireland -3.54% -5.35% -6.51% -6.24% -4.65% -1.20% -1.64% -3.39% 1.55% 1.07% 4.40% -4.16% 8.47%
Japan 3.58% 3.88% 4.71% 2.83% 2.78% 3.87% 2.08% 1.01% 0.90% 0.79% 3.11% 3.84% 4.04%
Mexico 0.00% -0.38% -0.95% -1.53% -0.88% -0.50% -1.06% -1.55% -2.44% -1.87% -2.59% -2.22% -1.64%
Poland -2.61% -3.99% -6.34% -6.67% -3.95% -5.37% -5.20% -3.72% -1.27% -2.08% -0.57% -0.53% 0.16%
Portugal -9.88% -10.68% -9.72% -12.12% -10.42% -10.15% -5.98% -1.78% 1.58% 0.08% 0.12% 0.59% 0.45%
Russia 10.32% 8.89% 5.26% 5.85% 3.76% 4.25% 4.70% 3.22% 1.44% 2.70% 4.93% 1.94% 2.11%
South Africa -3.13% -4.48% -5.38% -5.54% -2.73% -1.50% -2.22% -5.14% -5.79% -5.08% -4.60% -2.78% -2.37%
Spain -7.49% -8.98% -9.63% -9.25% -4.28% -3.92% -3.18% -0.22% 1.52% 1.08% 1.16% 2.26% 1.84%
Switzerland 13.44% 14.30% 10.09% 2.29% 7.29% 14.67% 7.82% 10.66% 11.61% 8.52% 11.24% 9.43% 6.68%
Turkey -4.16% -5.65% -5.38% -4.99% -1.63% -5.64% -8.87% -5.51% -6.69% -4.67% -3.73% -3.84% -5.50%
United Kingdom -2.04% -3.05% -3.58% -4.23% -3.55% -3.38% -1.96% -3.77% -5.15% -4.93% -4.91% -5.22% -3.34%
United States -5.72% -5.83% -4.92% -4.63% -2.58% -2.88% -2.87% -2.64% -2.08% -2.08% -2.24% -2.31% -2.31%
33
1.7 Foreign Debt Service as a percentage of Exports
Country Name 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 10.75% 13.22% 9.91% 2.52% 8.55% 4.48% 4.18% 5.86% 7.01% 10.47% 15.63% 25.06% 13.36%
Australia 6.17% 8.18% 6.12% 5.39% 7.09% 10.25% 11.78% 14.22% 13.57% 17.15% 30.86% 14.54% 10.43%
Austria 2.91% 2.01% 1.19% 1.02% 1.56% 1.44% 2.94% 3.42% 5.21% 5.51% 9.04% 9.64% 10.66%
Belgium 7.89% 6.14% 5.23% 3.90% 3.82% 2.47% 2.31% 2.09% 2.40% 2.74% 3.85% 3.52% 3.71%
Brazil 46.19% 38.25% 28.05% 23.47% 23.49% 18.37% 18.73% 15.69% 28.09% 22.48% 38.10% 51.25% 36.19%
China 3.38% 2.63% 2.37% 2.07% 2.93% 2.98% 2.91% 3.08% 3.03% 3.01% 4.89% 6.83% 7.62%
germany 5.56% 7.68% 8.02% 8.18% 8.34% 7.88% 8.66% 8.57% 7.99% 7.10% 7.14% 10.04% 11.06%
Greece 15.12% 14.77% 13.38% 5.41% 6.84% 8.61% 10.44% 9.42% 10.99% 17.56% 14.41% 15.34% 16.86%
Hungary 9.55% 8.50% 10.38% 6.14% 4.22% 12.51% 0.39% 0.38% 0.66% 1.38% 1.91% 5.37% 1.48%
India 14.93% 8.64% 15.59% 9.66% 6.02% 6.82% 6.41% 6.70% 8.07% 18.63% 11.21% 17.26% 10.07%
Indonesia 20.90% 25.75% 19.06% 14.48% 19.57% 18.73% 14.41% 16.81% 20.36% 30.72% 31.99% 39.84% 33.96%
Ireland 5.42% 4.30% 4.71% 5.20% 5.80% 4.91% 4.72% 4.85% 4.94% 5.40% 6.21% 7.81% 7.95%
Japan 5.01% 4.41% 3.31% 2.55% 2.07% 2.67% 3.45% 8.55% 3.66% 4.33% 5.30% 4.96% 3.26%
Mexico 15.51% 19.90% 12.73% 11.09% 12.67% 10.11% 11.21% 17.82% 10.16% 11.50% 13.16% 19.44% 14.01%
Poland 24.74% 27.61% 15.45% 18.99% 18.11% 18.71% 14.68% 7.60% 7.68% 8.96% 12.93% 13.07% 11.31%
Portugal 9.52% 6.83% 5.33% 4.50% 5.77% 4.52% 6.91% 16.03% 11.44% 22.06% 16.62% 10.69% 12.35%
Russia 14.19% 13.20% 8.69% 13.85% 24.22% 11.61% 7.25% 7.85% 7.99% 14.48% 23.36% 19.04% 26.00%
South Africa 6.42% 8.68% 4.24% 6.94% 5.95% 5.65% 4.76% 7.86% 10.61% 6.61% 7.77% 13.11% 12.19%
spain 13.74% 8.70% 14.47% 9.57% 6.91% 7.41% 6.61% 7.37% 8.85% 18.08% 11.14% 16.16% 10.69%
Switzerland 6.77% 5.92% 34.08% 15.52% 14.67% 4.74% 3.81% 13.20% 0.54% 0.65% 7.25% 4.44% 1.87%
Turkey 37.40% 32.87% 32.33% 30.13% 41.53% 36.51% 30.84% 26.94% 29.65% 25.83% 27.44% 39.37% 40.22%
united kingdom 13.80% 12.40% 10.15% 9.87% 12.42% 9.74% 8.39% 8.82% 9.23% 9.49% 12.62% 14.57% 14.44%
United States 2.56% 2.12% 2.24% 1.98% 2.34% 2.34% 3.89% 3.64% 3.16% 4.17% 3.82% 3.87% 5.94%
34
1.9 Net International Liquidity (Months of Import Cover)
Countries 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 8.47 7.99 6.96 6.39 8.19 5.85 5.50 4.75 4.38 2.89 3.22 2.79 3.32
Australia 1.90 2.44 2.27 2.99 3.38 1.35 1.55 1.92 1.99 2.19 2.29 2.42 2.47
Austria 0.83 0.63 0.54 0.50 0.55 0.70 0.57 0.51 0.60 0.67 0.72 0.70 0.80
Belgium 0.53 0.43 0.37 0.31 0.34 0.35 0.30 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.53 0.48 0.45
Brazil 2.81 2.84 2.44 2.30 3.78 5.68 5.78 7.01 8.15 10.26 12.60 11.56 11.51
China 1.90 2.09 2.74 3.81 5.28 5.72 6.28 7.39 8.39 8.80 9.87 11.15 10.94
Germany 0.72 0.59 0.52 0.51 0.50 0.45 0.42 0.55 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.53 0.50
Greece 1.08 0.48 0.12 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.26
Hungary 1.01 0.99 1.03 1.23 1.60 1.54 2.13 2.82 2.80 2.75 2.37 2.37 2.12
India 1.08 1.19 1.32 1.22 1.53 1.96 1.54 1.53 1.76 1.73 1.83 1.79 1.86
Indonesia 1.17 1.11 0.98 0.92 1.19 1.30 1.04 1.22 1.77 2.00 2.17 1.97 2.19
Ireland 0.45 0.28 0.17 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.06
Japan 9.42 11.83 13.92 15.03 17.85 16.56 17.01 16.05 16.43 18.04 17.44 17.89 18.29
Mexico 1.33 1.30 1.29 1.57 1.83 1.70 1.80 1.76 2.12 2.40 2.53 2.68 2.92
Poland 1.58 1.39 1.24 1.42 1.75 1.98 1.81 2.28 2.67 2.54 2.65 2.43 2.22
Portugal 1.55 0.73 0.59 0.44 0.30 0.19 0.21 0.35 0.47 0.27 0.27 0.31 0.48
Russia 1.38 1.72 2.15 2.95 6.76 8.08 6.08 5.51 5.77 6.39 9.23 9.24 7.11
South Africa 0.56 0.47 0.82 1.22 1.74 1.91 1.81 1.97 2.06 2.32 2.27 2.40 2.47
Spain 1.05 0.52 0.30 0.27 0.34 0.32 0.35 0.54 0.58 0.92 0.94 0.91 1.02
Switzerland 2.85 2.95 3.07 2.10 2.18 2.22 2.10 4.52 9.14 12.40 20.13 19.77 21.57
Turkey 1.22 1.30 1.20 1.89 2.52 2.42 2.07 2.03 2.18 2.13 2.67 2.86 2.66
United Kingdom 0.71 0.56 0.61 0.65 0.72 0.76 0.70 0.84 1.02 1.14 1.20 1.21 1.29
United States 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.33 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.56 0.56 0.60 0.58 0.54 0.50
35
Appendix 2. FDI statistics for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23 Countries
36
Appendix 3. Individual Variable Ratings for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23
Countries
37
3.3 Investment Profile
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 6.54 6.63 6.50 6.38 5.50 5.08 6.17 6.00 6.17 6.21 6.25 7.79 7.79
Australia 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.25 10.50 10.50 10.67 11.21 12.00 12.00 12.00
Austria 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.46 11.17 8.67 8.00 9.13 9.50 9.50 9.50
Belgium 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.25 10.50 10.17 9.50 7.92 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.58 8.58
Brazil 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.29 7.00 7.08 7.83 7.58 7.50 7.58 7.25 7.00 7.00
China 7.21 7.29 7.08 7.00 7.00 6.50 6.58 7.08 7.50 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00
Germany 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.88 11.50 11.50 11.25 10.92 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Greece 10.33 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 7.46 7.00 6.54 7.21 7.00 7.38 8.63 8.63
Hungary 11.58 11.50 11.42 11.00 10.83 9.38 9.42 7.50 7.50 8.13 8.92 9.92 9.92
India 9.33 8.92 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 7.71 7.50 7.50 8.08 8.67 8.67
Indonesia 6.75 9.13 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.88 7.54 7.33 7.50 8.50 7.42 7.71 7.71
Ireland 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.92 10.67 9.92 9.08 7.50 7.58 9.21 11.50 12.00 12.00
Japan 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.00 11.46 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50
Mexico 10.83 10.50 10.50 9.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 10.00 9.50 7.58 7.42 7.42
Poland 11.50 11.04 11.00 11.33 11.50 11.50 11.13 9.42 9.00 9.50 9.50 9.08 9.08
Portugal 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.92 11.50 10.17 7.17 6.50 6.50 6.50 8.17 8.75 8.75
Russia 9.00 8.88 8.67 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 8.92 8.50 7.67 7.50 8.00 8.00
South Africa 11.00 10.71 10.50 10.50 10.00 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.38 7.42 7.29 7.63 7.63
Spain 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.92 11.08 10.42 9.58 6.71 6.92 8.50 8.88 9.50 9.50
Switzerland 11.96 12.00 12.00 11.92 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50
Turkey 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.67 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.58 7.25 6.04 6.00 6.50 6.50
United Kingdom 12.00 12.00 12.00 11.63 10.50 10.92 10.88 8.50 8.71 11.08 11.96 11.71 11.71
United States 11.67 12.00 12.00 11.75 11.71 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
38
3.5 External Conflict
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 9.88 10.00 9.96 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50
Australia 10.38 9.63 9.50 9.50 9.92 10.00 10.67 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Austria 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50
Belgium 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50
Brazil 11.00 11.00 10.63 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
China 10.04 9.42 9.58 10.00 9.96 9.38 9.33 9.50 8.92 8.00 8.00 7.50 7.50
Germany 10.08 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Greece 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.17 10.00 10.00 10.08 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Hungary 10.50 10.29 10.00 10.38 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.04 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
India 9.54 9.83 10.00 10.00 9.96 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.29 9.00 9.00 9.00
Indonesia 10.67 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 9.75 9.50 9.50 9.50
Ireland 11.00 11.00 11.38 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50
Japan 9.17 9.04 9.33 9.50 9.50 9.38 9.00 9.00 8.88 9.46 9.50 9.50 9.50
Mexico 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 10.88 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Poland 10.00 9.54 9.50 10.75 11.00 10.54 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Portugal 10.00 10.00 9.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50
Russia 9.17 9.21 8.54 7.54 7.17 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 7.33 6.54 6.50 6.50
South Africa 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Spain 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Switzerland 11.29 11.00 11.00 11.00 10.58 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50
Turkey 9.25 8.50 7.92 7.75 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.17 7.00 7.00 7.50 7.50
United Kingdom 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.83 6.50 7.83 8.83 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50
United States 7.71 7.79 7.08 9.13 9.96 9.67 9.58 10.50 10.33 9.83 9.88 10.00 10.00
3.6 Corruption
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.17 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Australia 5.00 4.63 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.88 5.00 4.67 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Austria 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.92 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Belgium 4.00 3.71 3.50 3.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.96 4.50 4.50 4.50
Brazil 1.83 1.96 2.00 2.33 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.67 2.50 2.46 2.00 2.00 2.00
China 2.00 1.88 2.13 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Germany 4.54 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Greece 2.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.04 2.50 2.50 2.50
Hungary 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
India 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Indonesia 1.00 2.33 3.04 3.58 3.83 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Ireland 3.67 3.88 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.83 4.00 4.04 4.50 4.50 4.50
Japan 3.50 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Mexico 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.29 2.50 2.33 2.00 2.00 1.92 1.50 1.50 1.50
Poland 2.13 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.83 3.00 3.04 3.50 3.50 3.50
Portugal 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.67 3.50 3.54 4.00 4.00 4.00
Russia 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
South Africa 2.17 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.88 2.96 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Spain 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.96 3.50 3.50 3.50
Switzerland 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.83 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Turkey 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.04 2.50 2.50 2.50
United Kingdom 4.50 4.29 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.33 4.50 4.54 5.00 5.00 5.00
United States 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.71 3.58 4.50 4.50 4.50
39
3.7 Military in Politics
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 4.33 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Australia 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Austria 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Belgium 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Brazil 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
China 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Germany 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Greece 4.58 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Hungary 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
India 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Indonesia 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Ireland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Japan 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Mexico 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.08 3.67 3.50 3.38 3.00 3.00 3.00
Poland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Portugal 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Russia 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.08 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
South Africa 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Spain 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Switzerland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Turkey 4.00 3.17 2.17 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
United Kingdom 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
United States 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
40
3.9 Law and Order
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.42 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Australia 5.88 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50
Austria 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Belgium 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Brazil 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
China 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.08 3.63 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50
Germany 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Greece 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Hungary 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
India 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.38 4.50 4.50
Indonesia 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.54 2.50 2.50
Ireland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Japan 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Mexico 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.96 2.04 2.00 2.00 1.58 1.88 1.83 1.50 1.50 1.50
Poland 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50
Portugal 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Russia 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
South Africa 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.38 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Spain 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Switzerland 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Turkey 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 3.83 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.38 3.00 3.00 3.00
United Kingdom 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.29 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
United States 5.00 5.00 4.71 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
41
3.11 Democratic Accountability
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.33 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Australia 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Austria 5.00 5.21 5.50 5.63 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Belgium 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Brazil 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
China 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Germany 5.58 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Greece 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Hungary 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.92 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50
India 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Indonesia 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.00 4.00 4.00
Ireland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Japan 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Mexico 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.83 4.08 4.00 4.00
Poland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Portugal 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.58 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50
Russia 3.50 3.25 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
South Africa 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Spain 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Switzerland 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Turkey 5.50 5.50 5.21 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.08 4.00 3.71 3.88 4.00 3.75 3.75
United Kingdom 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
United States 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
42
3.13 GDP per Capita
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 2 2.5 2.5 3 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Australia 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Austria 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Belgium 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Brazil 2 2.5 2.5 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 3 3
China 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3 3 3
Germany 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Greece 4.5 4.5 5 5 5 5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 4 4
Hungary 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Indonesia 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
India 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Ireland 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Japan 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mexico 3 3 3 3 2.5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Poland 2.5 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Portugal 4 4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 4 4 4
Russia 2 2.5 3 3.5 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 3 3.5
South Africa 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5
Spain 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 4.5 5
Switzerland 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Turkey 2.5 2.5 3 3.5 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3
United Kingdom 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
United States 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
43
3.15 Inflation Rate
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 7.5 7 7.5 7.5 8 7 7.5 7 7 3.5 4 3 4
Australia 9.5 9 9.5 8.5 10 9.5 9 10 9.5 9.5 10 10 10
Austria 9.5 10 9.5 9 10 10 9 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 9.5
Belgium 9.5 9.5 10 8.5 10 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 9.5
Brazil 8 8.5 9 8.5 8.5 8.5 8 8.5 8 8 7.5 7.5 9
China 10 10 8.5 8.5 10 9 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10 9.5 10
Germany 10 10 9.5 9.5 10 10 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10
Greece 9 9 9.5 8.5 10 8.5 9 10 10 10 10 10 10
Hungary 9 9 8 8 8.5 8.5 9 8.5 10 10 10 10 9.5
Indonesia 9 8 8.5 7.5 7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9
India 7 6.5 8 7 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8 8 8 9 9
Ireland 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Japan 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 10 10 10
Mexico 9 9 9 8.5 8.5 8.5 9 8.5 9 8.5 9.5 9.5 8
Poland 9.5 10 9.5 8.5 9 9.5 8.5 9 10 10 10 10 9.5
Portugal 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 10 10 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 10
Russia 6.5 7.5 7.5 6 7 8 7.5 8.5 8 8 6 8 9
South Africa 9 8.5 8 7 8 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8 8.5 8 8.5
Spain 9 9 9.5 8.5 10 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 9.5
Switzerland 10 10 10 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Turkey 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 8 7.5 8 7.5 8 7.5 8 8 7
United Kingdom 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9 8.5 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 9.5
United States 9 9 9.5 9 10 10 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 9.5
44
3.17 Current Account as a percentage of GDP
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 13 13 13 12 13 11 11 11 10 11 10 10 10
Australia 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Austria 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 13 12 13 12
Belgium 13 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 12
Brazil 12 12 12 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11
China 13 14 14 14 13 13 12 13 12 13 13 12 12
Germany 13 13 14 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Greece 9 8 7 7 8 8 9 10 10 11 11 11 11
Hungary 9 9 9 9 11 12 12 12 13 12 13 14 13
Indonesia 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11
India 12 13 13 12 12 12 12 10 10 10 10 11 11
Ireland 10 10 9 9 10 11 11 10 12 12 13 10 14
Japan 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 12 12 13 13 13
Mexico 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 10 11
Poland 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 10 11 11 12
Portugal 9 8 9 8 8 8 10 11 12 12 12 12 12
Russia 15 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 13 12 13
South Africa 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Spain 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 11 12 12 12 13 12
Switzerland 15 15 15 13 14 15 14 15 15 14 15 14 14
Turkey 10 10 10 10 11 10 9 10 9 10 10 10 10
United Kingdom 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 10 10 10 10
United States 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
45
3.19 Foreign Debt Service as a percentage of Exports
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 9 8.5 9 10 9.5 10 10 9.5 9.5 9 8.5 7 8.5
Australia 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 6.5 8.5 9
Austria 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 9.5 9 9 9
Belgium 9.5 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Brazil 4.5 5.5 7 7.5 7.5 8 8 8.5 7 7.5 5.5 4 6
China 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 9.5
Germany 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 9
Greece 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 9 9 8 8.5 8.5 8.5
Hungary 9 9.5 9 9.5 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 10
India 8 7 8 8.5 8 8 8.5 8.5 8 6.5 6.5 5.5 6
Indonesia 8.5 9.5 8.5 9 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8 9 8 9
Ireland 9.5 10 10 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5
Japan 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 10 10 9.5 10 10
Mexico 8.5 8 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 8.5 8 8.5
Poland 7.5 7 8.5 8 8 8 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 8.5 9
Portugal 9 9.5 9.5 10 9.5 10 9.5 8.5 9 7.5 8.5 9 9
Russia 8.5 8.5 9.5 8.5 7.5 9 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 7.5 8 7
South Africa 9.5 9.5 10 9.5 9.5 9.5 10 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 8.5 9
Spain 8.5 9.5 8.5 9 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8 9 8.5 9
Switzerland 9.5 9.5 6 8.5 8.5 10 10 8.5 10 10 9.5 10 10
Turkey 5.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 5 6 6.5 7 6.5 7 7 5.5 5.5
United Kingdom 8.5 9 9 9 9 9 9.5 9.5 9 9 9 8.5 8.5
United States 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5
46
3.21 Net International Liquidity as Months of Import Cover
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 3 2.5 2.5 1.5 2 1.5 2
Australia 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Austria 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Belgium 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0
Brazil 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 3 3 3.5 3.5 4 4.5 4 4
China 1 1.5 1.5 2 3 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4 4 4
Germany 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0
Greece 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hungary 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
India 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Indonesia 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 1 1.5
Ireland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Japan 4 4 4.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mexico 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Poland 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Portugal 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Russia 1 1 1.5 1.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 3 3.5 4 4 3.5
SouthAfrica 0.5 0 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Spain 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1
Switzerland 1.5 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 4 4.5 5 5 5
Turkey 1 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
UnitedKingdom 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1
UnitedStates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0
47
Appendix 4. Political Risk Rating for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23 Countries
Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 68.96 71.00 70.67 67.00 64.88 64.00 66.46 65.21 61.92 62.08 64.17 66.79 67.80
Australia 88.33 86.96 86.50 87.17 87.79 86.08 82.13 81.92 83.54 83.71 83.63 84.54 85.23
Austria 85.92 85.38 86.75 87.33 89.54 88.88 87.50 83.29 82.04 82.96 82.75 80.33 78.65
Belgium 83.88 84.00 81.54 82.13 83.79 83.08 80.79 78.42 79.04 78.88 77.79 77.58 77.08
Brazil 65.71 65.96 65.46 67.13 68.17 68.17 67.54 68.58 66.46 64.46 61.71 61.96 62.41
China 69.25 68.33 69.13 68.08 67.00 64.46 60.92 61.13 61.29 57.04 56.38 55.00 54.95
Germany 82.00 85.54 86.83 86.46 85.88 83.58 81.42 83.71 84.38 85.08 84.67 83.67 82.44
Greece 77.25 76.96 76.79 74.58 73.00 69.67 67.46 66.79 65.21 65.96 70.21 70.58 70.43
Hungary 80.00 79.33 77.50 75.63 74.79 76.04 76.33 72.17 72.75 74.83 75.63 76.92 76.85
India 63.71 63.54 62.46 60.83 63.17 62.04 58.33 57.63 58.83 60.46 61.63 62.88 63.20
Indonesia 53.50 59.54 61.25 59.96 61.79 60.33 59.00 56.08 55.63 56.96 54.79 55.29 55.79
Ireland 89.67 89.83 89.75 89.25 82.88 79.88 80.21 78.29 77.04 81.00 85.83 85.79 85.67
Japan 83.08 83.58 80.63 78.25 78.50 80.63 79.46 78.83 82.33 82.13 83.00 83.08 83.18
Mexico 72.96 73.13 75.50 74.00 70.88 68.88 69.17 67.75 68.96 66.17 59.96 60.42 61.00
Poland 75.00 75.63 74.71 79.58 80.63 79.96 78.79 76.54 74.42 75.50 77.88 78.96 79.26
Portugal 83.83 84.08 83.75 83.21 82.04 79.00 73.92 72.33 70.58 72.38 75.63 78.00 79.55
Russia 67.08 66.83 66.00 65.75 63.21 63.88 61.96 59.50 58.04 56.25 55.75 56.50 56.95
South Africa 70.63 69.25 68.83 67.63 68.00 67.13 66.71 65.96 65.54 63.29 63.79 62.67 62.58
Spain 79.63 80.92 79.54 78.88 75.58 73.13 69.50 68.21 67.75 69.75 72.17 71.83 72.92
Switzerland 89.25 89.00 88.92 88.42 86.67 86.00 86.67 87.71 88.00 88.00 87.88 87.67 87.44
Turkey 69.33 65.83 63.04 60.50 59.21 57.38 57.04 56.67 55.67 52.17 52.33 53.21 53.81
United Kingdom 83.58 81.75 81.83 79.88 76.42 79.67 79.79 76.92 77.46 81.00 85.42 83.92 82.63
United States 81.75 80.33 77.42 80.25 83.96 81.79 81.21 83.63 81.42 80.00 83.17 84.33 85.42
48
Appendix 6. Financial Risk Rating for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23 Countries
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 43.5 43 42.5 43.5 42.5 43 42 41 38.5 34.5 37 30.5 35
Australia 32 33 32 33.5 34.5 31 33 32.5 32 31.5 27.5 31.5 33.5
Austria 33 34 33 33 33.5 33.5 33 33 32.5 32.5 31 32 32
Belgium 32 31.5 30.5 31.5 32 32 32 32 32.5 32.5 31.5 32 32
Brazil 35 37.5 38 38 39 37.5 38.5 38.5 37 37.5 32.5 36 38.5
China 44 44.5 45.5 45.5 46.5 45 45.5 45.5 45 45 46 45.5 45.5
Germany 33 33 31.5 31 32.5 32 32 32.5 33 32.5 32 32 32
Greece 34.5 33.5 32.5 32.5 34 33 32.5 33 32 32 31.5 32.5 32.5
Hungary 31 29.5 25 26.5 26.5 27.5 30 32 33.5 33.5 32.5 33.5 35
India 36 35.5 36 37.5 37 38 39 38 38.5 36.5 36 36.5 36
Indonesia 39 40.5 39.5 39 40 37 40 38.5 38.5 37 38.5 39 40
Ireland 31.5 33 32 31 32.5 32 32 31 31 30.5 29.5 30.5 30.5
Japan 42.5 42 42 41.5 42.5 42.5 41.5 41.5 40 41.5 40 40 42
Mexico 42.5 41.5 43.5 42.5 40 42.5 41 39.5 40.5 39.5 39.5 38.5 40
Poland 34.5 35.5 36 33 33 35.5 35.5 37 36.5 36 34.5 35 37
Portugal 31.5 31.5 29.5 29.5 30.5 31 30.5 29.5 31 29.5 29.5 31 31
Russia 34.5 34.5 36.5 35.5 33 39 40.5 42 41.5 39.5 35 39 37.5
SouthAfrica 43 42.5 42 41 41 40 42.5 39 39 39 40.5 37.5 38
Spain 31.5 31 28.5 29.5 31 31 31 30.5 30.5 29 29 30.5 31.5
Switzerland 30 29 26 27 30 31.5 30.5 33 36 36.5 36.5 38 38
Turkey 37.5 39 37 36 34.5 38 36.5 39 38 36.5 36 34.5 33
UnitedKingdom 28 28.5 27.5 29.5 29.5 28.5 28 30 29 30 30 28.5 29.5
UnitedStates 35 34.5 34 33 34 34 34 34.5 33.5 33.5 33.5 33.5 33.5
Appendix 7. Composite Country Risk Rating for the year of 2005-2017 belonging to 23
Countries
COUNTRIES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Argentina 76.73 77.50 77.33 75.00 68.94 71.75 73.23 69.10 67.71 62.54 67.08 62.15 67.65
Australia 80.67 80.23 79.50 79.08 79.65 77.29 76.31 77.21 77.02 77.10 75.31 78.02 79.11
Austria 80.21 81.19 81.38 80.42 78.77 81.44 80.75 77.65 76.52 77.98 77.13 77.42 76.33
Belgium 78.69 79.00 77.77 75.56 74.90 77.79 75.15 73.46 74.52 74.94 74.40 74.29 75.04
Brazil 68.85 70.23 70.98 71.81 70.08 72.08 71.52 71.29 69.48 67.23 60.10 62.23 67.20
China 77.13 77.67 78.56 78.04 78.00 75.98 73.96 75.06 74.15 72.52 72.94 71.50 71.72
Germany 77.50 81.02 81.67 79.23 76.44 78.79 78.96 79.10 79.94 81.04 80.08 80.08 79.72
Greece 72.38 73.23 71.90 67.54 66.25 63.58 62.48 63.90 62.85 67.73 68.35 70.54 71.46
Hungary 72.75 71.17 66.75 67.31 64.90 69.52 71.42 69.08 73.38 74.67 75.06 76.21 76.67
India 68.10 67.27 67.48 65.17 66.33 67.02 65.67 64.81 65.92 66.73 67.31 68.19 68.35
Indonesia 64.25 68.27 69.63 67.73 69.65 67.92 68.50 65.29 64.31 64.48 63.65 65.40 66.15
Ireland 81.83 82.92 81.38 74.38 71.44 72.44 74.35 71.65 73.02 77.25 80.17 78.90 81.34
Japan 83.04 83.29 82.06 78.63 76.25 81.56 78.48 78.92 80.42 80.31 81.75 81.54 84.09
Mexico 77.48 77.06 78.50 76.25 69.69 74.94 73.33 71.88 71.98 70.83 67.73 67.96 69.25
Poland 73.00 75.06 74.85 74.29 74.06 75.48 75.65 74.52 73.71 74.75 75.94 76.73 78.63
Portugal 74.17 74.54 74.88 73.10 70.27 71.00 67.71 66.17 68.79 69.19 71.81 74.50 75.52
Russia 72.29 72.42 72.75 71.38 64.35 72.69 72.48 71.75 68.77 66.38 61.13 65.25 66.97
SouthAfrica 75.31 75.13 74.42 71.81 69.50 71.81 72.60 69.73 69.52 67.90 68.90 66.08 67.04
Spain 75.31 76.46 74.27 71.44 67.79 68.56 66.00 64.60 66.63 68.63 70.58 71.92 72.46
Switzerland 82.63 82.50 81.21 79.46 78.33 81.75 80.58 82.60 84.25 84.25 84.44 84.83 84.97
Turkey 72.42 71.42 69.02 65.50 60.60 66.19 65.77 66.58 66.08 63.33 63.92 62.85 62.40
UnitedKingdom 75.29 74.63 74.17 71.69 66.96 71.08 71.65 70.71 71.73 74.50 76.71 75.46 75.32
UnitedStates 77.38 76.42 74.46 73.13 73.73 75.40 74.35 76.56 75.96 75.50 77.58 77.42 78.21
49
References
50